Sevile deceived and manipulated virtually an entire nation. You simply can't see into people’s minds. Blaming a single person for not seeing through him is ridiculous
Some claim saville was the illegitimate son of Mountbatten he always refered to his mother as the "Dutchess" ..... Mountbatten was Charles mentor.... apparently 🤔
They were both damaged goods, she wanted a strong Father figure, he wanted a strong supportive Matriarch - the relationship was doomed from the start, neither party is solely to blame......
Charles didn't want a wife, he wanted a mommy who would pat him on the head and put his fingerpaintings on the fridge. Instead, he got a shy, sensitive girl (Diana) who expected him to be a husband, and who had legendary charisma (thus taking the attention off off him). He couldn't handle it.
I have read multiple stories about how Diana was very different in private and had mental problems. I don’t think she ever loved Charles either, she wanted to be Queen
I think you need to have lived with a person to know if they are mad or not and even then it is difficult because you may just be witnessing a response.
Why do people think they know the whole story? Diana was a proper handful before Charles. She also knew Charles and Camilla were close, but she thought she could be Queen of Hearts, Queen of England, but she was too immature and not intelligent enough to do it the 'right' way!!
@@joannajones3833 Bottom line he was not faithful to his vows. He was calling Camilla even on their honey moon. She married an old man who believed mistresses were a okay with the Church of England. Maybe HE should have done it the 'right'way.
Blame the family…not him…..Camilla was already there and he had no choice other than marry someone else. Diana was beautiful adorable but not mature and extremely manipulative… she was a child in love with the idea of becoming a queen thinking he would finally stay with her…. And he is spoiled as expected…..
The dynamics within the royal family can be complex and subject to various interpretations. Queen Elizabeth's views on her son Charles and her decision-making remain private matters, often subject to speculation or interpretation by different sources. However, any such descriptions or statements are often part of broader narratives and discussions about the royal family.
She refused to abdicate because that is not how the British monarchy works. She also was old enough to remember the abdication of Edward VIII, and no doubt she felt it would be irresponsible. Charles seems to have been doing very well, so I doubt most people would agree he was hopeless.
At least Charles didn’t manage to sink as many of his allied fleet as his uncle. Mountbatten was promoted above his ability to keep him out of harms way.
A friend was at Gordonstoun at the same time as Charles. He was generally regarded as being irredeemably thick, and not approachable. I incline to being thick myself but at least I know it.
Thank you for sharing that insight. Everyone has their own experiences and perceptions. Prince Charles attended Gordonstoun, and while opinions may differ, we appreciate your perspective and thank you for your comment. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Name me ONE successful alumnus of Gordonstoun who was a contemporary of the then Prince. The school, in those days, was a dumping ground for the idiot sons of the local lairds. It was notorious for an "eat nails, spit rust" toxic masculinity that manifested itself in a lot of very nasty bullying. The Prince would have been much better off at Eton, and it is telling that he sent his sons there, and not to "Colditz with kilts".
I watched a film. There was one line in that film, the protagonist says, "only the rich can make this world conform to their delusions." He could be a serial killer. He would still be king if he wants and the whole elite would cover it up, justify it and make it go away or make it normal.
Yet again people who should know better carp on about the title Defender of the Faith. It was given to Henry the eighth by the pope for a treatise against Martin Luther and the Protestant movement. That he kept it after the break with Rome is just another example of his need for power.
I don't know what history you are studying but Henry VIII split from the Catholic Church so he could steal all the MONEY from Britian's Catholic churches, since he spent too much, oh and wanted to get married again.
Thank you for your input! We appreciate the historical context you've provided. It's always enriching to delve into the historical intricacies surrounding titles and their evolution. If you have any more insights to share, we're all ears!
Yes it was a title conferred on him by a church he no longer recognised so he should have ceased to use it since he abandoned the authority which bestowed it.
I never knew he was a religous rebel. If he could just stop pushing for digital ID as the answer for everything, i might be sympathetic to this portrayal of him. That being said, I'm from the U.S. and think the whole monarchy thing is insane.
Thank goodness every day that you are a citizen of a Republic . Not the subject of a monarchy . I think that the Royal family need to stay in some way . But, with much less privileged and that they recognise citizenship of the British people . That they are NOT subject to them.
He's a member of the highly dangerous World Economic Forum. The digital ID is part of their agenda being pushed on ALL free countries and will cause a massive takeover of our rights and freedoms by totalitarianism. Has to be rejected at all cost or we WILL eventually come under a Communist regime.
They reinvented themselves and changed their surname as to suppress and hide the fact they're German. If it wasn't for Victoria, they'd be even more German than they already are. The Queen Mum was the main influence.
Why oh why did he wear those purple trousers at his coronation - a mix up at the dry cleaners? makes me wonder if a Prince Charming character in a theatre somewhere had to wear a purple jacket with black trousers.
@@ReviewsChannel-e4r They changed their surname to show that they were not "German", that they were British. They did it to publicly cut ties. Anyone who has read Royal history knew what their house name had been previously.
Absolutely, all mentors should encourage treating everyone, especially women, with kindness and respect. There's no excuse for anything less. Thanks for your comment!
I can't comment on this specific case but I think a man should always treat women with chivalry but remember that he IS the Man and wear the trousers accordingly.@@Official_Royalworld
Imagine, being born in a fish bowl surrounded by cameras. Every move you make, every word you speak is observed, recorded, critiqued, and judged. This is the Twilight Royal Zone. It would drive anyone a little bonkers.
Absolutely, the constant scrutiny can be overwhelming and surely takes a toll on anyone's mental state. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. We recommend other documents on our channel. 👍🏽❤️🎬
If Charles would of been a decent husband to Diana. She would of not had the mental and emotional issues. She was nieave and full of the farytail world of castles knights, Cinderella.
@@eilenekellogg-ki2brTwo most mismatched person, both need love and emotional security which neither can offer the other partner .They marry for the wrong reason, at least they produce William .
The balancing act between royal duties and family life can be a challenging one. While some royal children have been raised with nannies, the decisions made by the royal family regarding child-rearing can stem from various factors, including tradition and the demands of their roles.
There are kids who are abused throughout childhood, so yeah they missed their Mum, but in the end understood the role their Mum was born into. Could have been way worse couldn't it. I think they all turned out ok, bit spoilt, but you can see Prince WIlliam is way more grounded and for and of the people, like Catherine.The Monarchy will change for the better when they are crowned, though I love KCII and QCC, they are doing a great job all things considered.
She didn't have to.She was queen and could have demanded several hours of each day be put aside for her children.This, also, would have been a marvelous example to parents in her nation. This is what Diana did, and her children loved her for it. The sad part is also that Phillip was so remote and cold.
I just hate that such an undeserving man gets to have his cake and eat it. And have his subjects( yeah, they are named like that for a reason) go on applaud his homicidal being. Diana didn’t deserve what they did to her.
Thank you for expressing your thoughts. We understand your concerns and appreciate your perspective. We aim to focus on positivity and respect for everyone in our community. Your support means a lot to us.
@@jardinekelso Calm down, learn to spell words correctly & stop being so pedantic. There’s lots of information in the public domain regarding the relationship between Chaz & Di, including Chaz’s famous statement about what is love any way. The Royal Family has zero usefulness in the 21 century. The Queen was one of the wealthiest women in the country. Return the wealth to the British people & let’s build a fit-for-purpose National Health Service. Stop being so sycophantic, you’ll corrode your soul.
My 8 year old daughter wrote him a letter on her own. The only thing I did was put on the envelope. I don't read her personal correspondence. He wrote her back a real nice letter and signed it. It meant a lot to her. On that basis alone, I find him to be a very decent man. She writes to famous people a lot and most don't write back.
Appreciate your perspective! It's great to see alignment on matters like architecture and conservation. Different viewpoints enrich the conversation, though. We also recommend other documentaries on our channel.
Opinions about Prince Charles and his worldview differ widely. The prospect of his future reign as King Charles III brings varied perspectives and discussions. Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look! 👍🏽❤️🎬
I'm not a fan of the monarchy, however, he's right in regards to architecture AND his views on medicine - doctor's SHOULD be treating people as a whole, which includes emotionally, spiritually and physically. The Gerson therapy (which includes coffee enemas) is well known and extremely effective, as said by Albert Schweitzer, right at the beginning when Dr Max Gerson formulated it.
I see your point. Treating patients comprehensively, addressing emotional and spiritual aspects alongside physical health, is increasingly recognized in medicine. Alternative therapies like the Gerson therapy have gained attention, although their effectiveness is often debated within the medical community.
The part I disagreed with having people HAVE to seek homeopathic cures first BEFORE accepted medical procedures. As someone who had cancer come on very quickly, it was the fast diagnosis that saved my life. Charles is NOT a doctor and should have stayed in his own lane. I’m glad doctors came out so strongly against him-surprising him, to put patients FIRST, rather than ‘saving Britain money.
@@judywright4241 well if you think Doctors are 'always right' you are mistaken. they are not and need to maintain the status quo or they will be voting themselves out of their jobs. People decide whats right for them..... You get to choose and that will be different depending on who what where when I have faith in myself ..... and occasionaly a Doctor
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Mental health and its complexities often involve various factors beyond specific practices. Each individual's situation is unique and multifaceted. Your interest in our content is appreciated! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Not a fool. That title belongs to Harry. But not the most suitable of candidates to be King. ( or God ).. ( hugging trees is not in my dictionary as being the right thing to do as are many of his outlandish therapy ideas ).. As to Camilla?…. Age has certainly not been kind. .. and she certainly shouldn’t be Queen!!… 👵🇦🇺🇺🇸
Thank you for your comment. We value diverse opinions. Our channel focuses on discussing topics respectfully and fostering meaningful conversations. If you have further thoughts or insights, we're here to listen.
Mountbatten seemed invasive and domineering if you watch the body language. Charles was like a prisoner. I think its okay he had an open mind. The medical industry is too pharmaceutically led. He seems easily led. The polo group are seedy.
It's interesting to observe body language and social dynamics in these situations. People's actions can indeed reflect various influences and pressures they face, whether in public or private spheres. Thaks for your comment.
A King with an insecure mindset (he's not openminded) is a danger to himself and his kingdom. After the enduring and stable legacy of his mother, this man is the end of us all. His family has been torn apart because he couldn't love the woman he married and crushed. Now we're living the consequences of the rising of musslim terror.
The World Economic Forum's influence and the future of the monarchy might be concerning for some individuals. Changes in global dynamics and societal trends can influence perceptions and expectations about the monarchy's role and direction. Thanks for your comment!
@@heinrichvisser8518Harry is the same, I think Harry was planted in USA to help the elite treasonous pos that have cheated themselves into positions of power destroy America , Harry and mugs have already made remarks about the basic freedoms our founders fought died for...
Yes, beautiful, warm, "human like" architecture or ugly, "dead" architecture both affect our psyche very much. He has also an important point if he thinks it's everybodys own business what modalities they use for health. There is an absurd amount of control going on in a number of directions, while at the same time big pharma gets away with mörder on gigantic scale. It is absurd and horrific actually. These are basic things anyone can understand. But it is so unfortunate how Charles thinks the billionaire elite's plans for all of humanity is the way to move forward.
I'm only visiting to say that christening an heir to the British Crown, and for the recipient to not assume one of his other names, lies somewhere between Tempting Fate or Trying the Furies.
I wish Canada would remove the Royal Family as their ceremonial Head of State. We are all grown up now and no longer a colony of the British, nor do we possess any longer that colonial mentality. We can decide on our own affairs, manage our own resources and direct our own future. The Royals are an expensive frivolity and have no further rational meaning or purpose for us. We cringe when they come here for one of their "Look Us Over Tours" with the horrendous costs we have to bear for their visits, to give them gifts they don't need and just to hear them make irrelevant, forgettable and meaningless statements. I noticed that on the last visit here by Charles, the reaction by the public here was mostly hostile, so his appearances were very selective and limited to 3 very small controlled stops. Also noticed that the few members of the public that did meet him, they refused to bow to him as per protocol. The Royals' relationship with Canada has been mostly of an exploitive nature, which we now recognize. I and many people here, are ready to cut our ties with the Royal Family and declare ourselves as a Republic. We would not notice any change in how the government operates in Canada if they were removed. Let the Brits keep and pay for them if they enjoy and appreciate the occasional Jewelry & Costume Shows, all the while a large number of their Royal Subjects freeze to death every winter and struggle with food poverty.
Your perspective on Canada's relationship with the Royal Family is thought-provoking. Many share similar sentiments about the relevance and expenses tied to such ceremonial roles. Perspectives on the Royal Family's visits and their impact are varied, and many are considering alternative directions for the country's governance. We also recommend to have a look at the rest of documentaries on our channel! 👍🏽❤️🎬
You oink without us you would not have been a nation I know Canada trades with Moscow when real world has sanctions on Russia owning to evil war they have trust on Ukraine and its Crimea. So what else are you up to.?
Well, I think your colonial duties are NOT done with. I suppose, you see this incorrectly. How many indigenous children accompanied Charles this time to Britain ... ? One of the last time Queen Elizabeth came they were 300. Never to be seen (or heard) of again ... (That what I call cultivating sources of "fresh meat".)
I cannot imagine all of the trauma damage that has been done to the children who are growing up as royals. Everyone thinks they have it made, with everything money could buy. But they do not have the love and consistent attention of loving parents. They aren't allowed authenticity, even after they are crowned. These families seem so incredibly dysfunctional, as far back as the monarchy goes. Look at how many people have suffered irreparable harm, or even death, all because Prince Charles was not allowed to marry the love of his life. I feel compassion for Charles and Camilla, and I am glad they finally were allowed to get married. I just wish that King Charles and Queen Camilla would use their position of power to make changes in the archaic expectations placed on the young royals, and allow them to follow their passions, both in relationships and in pursuit of their interests and talents.
Your empathy toward the challenges faced by the royal family is understandable. The pressures they encounter and the scrutiny they endure are complex aspects of their lives. Encouraging positive changes within the royal family structure is a perspective many share. Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
The only thing that bothers me is Charles' preoccupation with the occult. We now have someone who is both the head of the Church of England and also a member of the Magic Circle. We can't serve two masters.
Charles' ideas are all inspired by the one world government, one world religion, smart cities etc where you will be monitored, tracked and traced 24/7.
Prince Charles has been vocal about various global issues, including environmental sustainability and community development. While his ideas may encompass global cooperation, attributing specific intentions or beliefs requires careful consideration and analysis of his statements and actions.
Actually, Charles is not that crazy when it comes to his medicinal beliefs. It would be typical of a conventional doctor to poo poo anything that he says if it isn’t along the lines of what the pharmaceutical companies say, but then we know after all the mess that the medical industry has created that some people don’t trust them. There is nothing wrong with holistic medicine. But of course, it conflicts with conventional medicine ideas. And let’s face it not all conventional medicine works. Just think about how many people have died taking pharmaceuticals. It’s staggeringly high and the number two killer next to heart disease. There are other things that he does that I do not agree with at all. But like with most people, you can’t agree with everything they do.
You've raised a valid point about differing medical beliefs. Holistic medicine often clashes with conventional approaches, and people's mistrust in certain medical practices is understandable. It's true, not all conventional medicine works, and there are concerns about pharmaceuticals' effects. Everyone has opinions and not all align on every aspect. Also, we recommend other documentaries on our channel.
@elizabethferguson7002 Well, this is from the Cancer UK website, but what so they know? "There is no typical length of time it takes for a drug to be tested and approved. It might take 10 to 15 years or more to complete all 3 phases of clinical trials before the licensing stage. But this time span varies a lot. There are many factors that affect how long it takes for a drug to be licensed"
Had mixed feelings about Charles until I saw a video of him talking randomly to some trail bikers on the Balmoral estate. His genuine interest in people became evident to me. Seeing him as an approachable human being was quite reveling in a very postive way.
It's great to hear about your positive experience seeing a different side of Charles. Moments like these can offer a unique perspective on public figures. Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Van der Post, despite his Dutch name, never showed himself much - or even at all - in the Netherlands, nor are his works - books etc - much to be seen there. In fact, I’m not sure whether they have even been published in Dutch. There was a reason for that. Too many people in the Netherlands knew a thing or two about his conduct in the Japanese POW camp where they were with him for 3 years or so. They kept mostly, but not entirely, quiet about it. But if Van der Post had sought the limelight in the Netherlands as much as he did in the English speaking world, they’d probably have opened up. Van der Post seems to have realised that and have decided that discretion was the better option.
It sounds like there might have been some controversy or information regarding Van der Post's conduct during his time in the Japanese POW camp that was known to some people but not widely discussed. This could have influenced his decision to avoid seeking attention or publishing his works in the Netherlands.
This video is an unaltered rerun of an old video a few years old before Charles became king. He had extremely odd friends including Jimmy Saville. Charles looked odd himself with his ‘talking to plants’ episode, and now that he is King and accordingly thanks to Henry the Eighth, Head of the Church of England; while not believing anything except a vague idea of ‘defender of all faiths’ several of which frankly totally conflict with each other. Such as the Muslim faith which seriously conflicts with Christianity. They are mutually exclusive, you cannot believe in both.
The video showcases older footage, shedding light on aspects of Charles' past. His diverse friendships and spiritual roles have generated various opinions and interpretations among people. The complexities of faith and its intersection with different beliefs often lead to diverse perspectives on religious compatibility.
@@Official_Royalworld Islam and Christianity are exclusive. It is not possible to believe in both. The absurdity of Charles thinking he can defend them and any other faith, all at the same time is really ridiculous. Is he defending frankly really evil faiths also?
Oh, Penny Junor, has always been so far up Charlie’s jacksie I’d quite forgotten what she looks like. She’s his mouthpiece, I wonder how Mrs Windsor likes that.
It seems like Penny Junor’s close relationship with Charles might influence her perspectives. Thanks for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel.
Herr Karl von Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha is also a devoted disciple of Klaus Schwab, a relation deluded and dangerous enough to undergo careful scrutineering.
KC is apparently an intelligent yet somewhat odd person with a great sense of humor and acting ability who also seems to care about some worthy things.
That's an interesting perspective on KC. People's diverse qualities often contribute to their unique personalities and impact on the world. Thanks for your comment, and we have more documentaries on our channel for you. 👍🏽❤️🎬
If intelligence should ever be measured by such psychotic need to gather infinite sums of money no matter what sociological damage it does. Not many think so - its just that fraction of a per cent with all the wealth & power that do. Reasonably ? - theres potential danger related to the way he might not be able to control hatred of the people that have never liked him & he may inflict great revenge.
Thats exactly the image being constantly projected by them. Its all very well managed. You need to look at information from other sources if you want to know exactly what he , and other members of the RF are involved in. .
Without a shred of a doubt, I can sum up Charles, Charles & Di, Charles & Chamila Easily!!! Charles was a mommas boy. Always and Extremely! If he could have breast fed to her majesty’s death, he would have! Plus he’s just as much a Narcissist. Dianna, a beautiful soul, wouldn’t focus her attention directly on him. She was the “People’s Princess”. She loved and cared for everyone. Especially those suffering. Insert her polar opposite, Camilla, who has and will always focus all her love and attention on Charles. The “Charles princess”. That is why Charles always loved Camilla and couldn’t love Dianna. She would never solely love him alone, nor offer up a lifetime of breastfeeding him his own kool aid. Diana would have been the Absolute Best queen! And Charles knew she would not only put the people before him, she would be so much more epically, monumentally beloved and adored.. perhaps even more so then his own mother.. He, being a narcissistic, sad little man, couldn’t mentally handle it. … just some friendly, honest and sincere thoughts from Canada. 🇨🇦
Certainly, your insights offer an interesting perspective on the dynamics within the royal family. Everyone sees things a bit differently, and it's fascinating to hear your thoughts from Canada! 🍁
My goodness!!! What a strange, convoluted mind you must have. You have obviously never seriously researched anything that you've commented on here! How could Charles be a momma's boy when he wouldn't see her for months at a time? He also had to wait patiently to shake her hand, while she was greeting others, after being away for months. No, no momma's boy there!! Diana incidentally fell out with almost everyone she knew, her mother, her sisters, her flatmates, her step mother. I've just realised, you know nothing, you're Canadian. That fits!!!
I must also be mad. I identify with many of his ideas and ideals. Though I did get distinctions at A level. You go King Charles , celebrate your uniqueness !
It's common to resonate with certain ideas or values shared by individuals, even if they're unconventional. Embracing diversity in perspectives often leads to a richer understanding of the world. Everyone's uniqueness contributes to a diverse and vibrant society.
Well, what does a decent malignant narcissist do to his son ... ? As Prince William is much classier, more educated & more regal than his father I wouldn't be surprised if King Charles would have him eliminated.
Well my dad was at Cambridge University at the same time as Charles. On his 21st birthday my dad made this giant 150 ft banner out of cardboard boxes saying Happy Birthday Charlie. Then my dad's best friend who was at the same campus as him(Trinity college) climbed 2 important 80 ft buildings in the middle of the night and strung it up for him to see from out his window. It made the Daily Telegraph paper at the time. Nice!
I think he is a brave, intelligent chap with my sense of humour. I am the same age as him and have seen the world change over the years. Respect and discipline are old fashioned these days. I don't know what is happening today but we need strong leadership to guide us through it.
It's interesting to share similar experiences and observations about the changing world. Strong leadership is indeed crucial, especially in navigating uncertain times.
A 40:03 @@helgardhossain9038I do not agree with infidelity but he's not the first or the last to indulge in it .He's no better or worse than an AWFUL LOT of men who take a mistress the women may be married or single some are married and they cheat Diana also cheated with married men .He just happened to be Royalty and it became news .But adultery now is just so common bur again I don't condone it in the least I'm just saying he's not the only one not by long chalk. But he was pushed snd pressurised into that marriage.
Some parts of service were not done publically. Found that suss as it was usually normal to do so?. Was that parts that head of church disagreed on?. Charles so desperate to marry camilla he bent a lot of rules. He not a honourable man or king, nor one to be head of the church.!
Nice way of putting it. Yes it is something that gets you feeling good.Architects are modern steal hard brick and concrete . Not much to say what is nice to see or fits in well . May be a bit back in Edwardian times but my word they had a better England then so why not appeal to better ways today
Poor Charles , with those big ears and clise together eyes and his finicky nature, I can't imagine anybody finding him attractive. I saw him live close up once, but can't remember if he was short too( at the Anglican Church in Milan ; I sang the descant in an anthem and got a look from him when I hit a high B natural)
Charles needed to be king to maintain the line of succession. It's odd how the line of succession was less stable after Charles' uncle abdicated. Also he needs to stay out of the medical field and leave that to the doctors. Because it's a complete waste to instill coffee via enema.
It's definitely interesting how the line of succession can have its twists and turns. Medical matters can indeed be best left to the professionals. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Actually, curing diabetes, migraines, high blood pressure, MS and various other diseases with fasting and enema should be made more public so patients can CHOOSE an alternative method of treatment (and ultimately cure) of their afflictions compared to the mafia-enforced ineffective medicine from pharmacy companies.
I am not a fan of Charles. However his respect for all religions is a good thing. His talk about healing the soul is 100% right. I heard about his farming hobby.
He is unfit for a kingvyet he became king. He even made Camilla queen instead of consort because she was not born as Windsor. I hate to vall her queen. They do not deserve the crown.
Opinions on royal matters can certainly differ. It's important how people perceive royal decisions. Also, we recommend other documentaries on our channel.
She is still the Consort, as she is not of the blood Royal, I e. He marries a princess from another land, she would be a Queen. As far as I'm concerned, Camilla is the Kings Official Mistress Not the Queen Consort.
The Queen Consort is married to the King. Her background has nothing to do with it. We just say Queen as we have done for over 1000 years. Nothing has changed. Read some history. All of Henry VIII’s wives were Queen Consorts including the foreign Princess Catherine. Charles II wife Queen Catherine was a Princess of Braganza.
Prince Charles is NOT brilliant. In fact, he was a mediocre student and his father Prince Phillip was very disappointed in him for various reasons. That said, his ideas are often ignorant and repulsive to those who actually THINK.
Opinions about Prince Charles' intellect and ideas can differ widely among individuals. Personal views about his academic performance and the merit of his ideas often vary based on different perspectives and evaluations. Thanks for your comment!
I find this vlog throughly offensive. I can't imagine how the King and his family will feel about it. This last year has proved that he is a good king.
Every non-royal Chinese person I know has lived that experience. If there is no room for a child to have autonomy for normal development it is unhealthy. Unless the child really wants what parents expect them to become it can create robots unable think for themselves or the pendulum swings the other way becoming so open minded the brains seem to fall out. Blame "well their parents did that to them so its accepted and ok" doesn't make it ok right. Snuffing out the spirit of a child to inherit more generational damage doesn't encourage a better world. It isn't like he is Donald Trump hoping to begin WWIII. He did his duty. He married a woman he didn't love to produce an heir and a spare. Was it his duty to keep trying to feel love for Diana the rest of his life span or people judge him evil? He isn't Jesus Christ perfect, just a human like everyone else. Religious extremists are dangerous whether Muslim, Jew, Christian or Hindu. His privileged life has been mostly a prison. I wish him happiness, peace and wisdom to guide people kindly without a sense of pompous entitlement.
If Charles was intellectually superior to Diana she wouldn't have been able to outwit him at every point. He believes in nonsense because that is his normality, it enabled him to indulge in controversial ideas. The man is a hypocrite, he has no experience or empathy with those who struggle; he is given money from taxpayers (not value for money) while increasing his wealth privately & avoiding taxes he can well afford. He may not of had affection from his parents but that is their way of suppressing emotion; many suffer far greater abuse & neglect. His ideas of homeopathy have no scientific base or even logic. He talks about spirituality but sold weapons to Arab nations. He is a narcissist who criticises architecture while many can't afford the cost of a dingy room to live in. He cynically used Diana to bear an heir before making her life intolerable, suggesting she was unhinged to justify his behaviour. The "firm" is a disgrace to Britain with it's scandals (many hidden), a reminder of colonial shame. It would be better to abolish the outdated, irrelevant & expensive monarchy to become a modern republic.
Your perspective reflects deep-seated concerns about the monarchy's role and individual actions. Discussions around the relevance of the monarchy versus a modern republic often involve diverse viewpoints and evaluations of historical and contemporary actions. Thanks for your comment and have a look at other documentaries on our channel! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Charles is not a bad person. No way is he "Monarch" material tho. Sometimes birthright does not produce a strong leader worthy of a crown. The Princess Royal Anne, would be my choice to be head of the United Kingdom.
It's interesting how different perspectives shape our opinions on leadership. People often have varied views on who might be the best fit for such roles. Thanks for your comment.
We do not need a strong arm man as King today. He is figure head only . Get a strong man and most of us would be shaking . Charles is that old fashioned English Gentleman that suits being King .No ripples of leg over the bed and no worry to anyone he will send us to war again .What do you want a King who leads armies from the front.I have served my nation in war and do not want it ever again .Peaceful King peaceful nation suits me my boy .
Thanks for your observation! Context certainly plays a role in shaping individuals. We're glad to see a focus on important global issues like climate respect. Your insights are appreciated!
She isn’t the Queen, it was a Morganatic marriage, as was offered to and rejected by what eventually became the Windsor’s. She is the consort, a job for which she is well qualified as she has consorted with an awful lot of chaps. So there is no such thing as a Queen Camilla, it’s not an animal that exists.
I believe Camilla holds the title of Queen Consort, though it's understandable to have differing perspectives on this matter. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Any British Queen who isn't the ruling Monarch, is a Queen Consort to her husband, the King ! Camilla is. Queen Elisabeth, The Queen Mother was. So was Queen Mary. And Queen Alixandra. Queen Victoria however was The Monarch. Her husband, Prince Albert was The Prince Consort. In the Netherlands 3 Queens had Prince Consort husbands. So did Queen Margrethe of Denmark. In the future Catherine, Princess of Wales will be Queen Consort to her husband William.
He had a l9ver all the way through- Diana was shattered by Charles infudelity throughout their marriage-( be it for a period emotional/then 31:16 physical- equally harming- " absolute infidelity". at any leve! but oionwlll any decent woman would be shattered by that.
Infidelity undoubtedly takes a heavy toll on any relationship, causing significant emotional distress and pain, regardless of its nature or duration. It can deeply wound trust and emotions in a partnership. 👍🏽❤️🎬
It was Queen Mum whom had promised Earl Spencer that one of his daughters would marry Charles .He had no way out of duty demanded of him .He loved Camilla
Do you know how much money is pouring into London and wanting to stand outside Buckingham palace and other big family homes that over the years need money for its upkeep ? I care nothing for these people especially charlie boy, he has had a privilege life but his conduct was atrocious in his behaviour, his moral conduct against this innocent young girl Dianne. He has done so many things wrong in my eyes. He will have to answer one day for his cruelness to her and other ladies. But these families especially men like him will have to answer for their stupidity. M. Taha
The financial aspects related to royal palaces and estates are often a topic of discussion. Regarding personal conduct or allegations against individuals, it's essential to be cautious in making claims or accusations without concrete evidence. These matters involve various perspectives and complexities, and they're often the subject of ongoing debate and speculation.
What a despicable hatchet job on the king! Many of the ideas raised (quite one-sidedly) in the video are the reasons I respect Charles. He could do a better job of running the country than the idiots who are currently in charge.
It seems the video's portrayal of the king didn't resonate with your view. Charles' qualities highlighted in the video may align with why you respect him. Everyone holds diverse opinions, and your perspective on his potential leadership stands out. We recommend other videos though!
The theme of this film is the infidelity of upper class British men. I believe this is the downfall of the white race and the source of the recent decline in the strength of Western countries and the reason for the rise in dictatorial leaders for a weakening race.
Themes in films often provoke varied interpretations. While infidelity might be a theme, attributing societal declines or geopolitical shifts to a single factor can be complex. Societal changes have multifaceted origins and interpretations.
I genuinely believe that Charles is the first true 'philosopher king' we've had since Henry II in the 12th century. He's a far better speaker than his beloved mother, or any other monarch since the age of broadcasting. He has ideas based on deep reflection and humanist values - something most of the world's political leaders are nowadays sorely lacking. Give him a chance, and he will shine!
Thank you for that wonderful comment on our King!!! If people gave it a little thought instead of jumping on the bandwagon, they must surely come to the same conclusion!!!
@@1gerard47 They often need to change clothes several times a day, and the military uniforms are extremely complicated. When they go out in public they are scrutinized severely, so if one medal or jewel is worn wrong, the press rakes them over the coals for it.
A story about the influences on Charles with no mention of Jimmy Saville is very odd indeed.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. We recommend other documents on our channel. 👍🏽❤️🎬
What is odder is the morbid obsession that people like you have with a man whose name you are unable to spell correctly. It was "Savile" - with one L.
Sevile deceived and manipulated virtually an entire nation. You simply can't see into people’s minds. Blaming a single person for not seeing through him is ridiculous
Some claim saville was the illegitimate son of Mountbatten he always refered to his mother as the "Dutchess" ..... Mountbatten was Charles mentor.... apparently 🤔
@@sailaway8244 „some claim“ means…….absolutely nothing
Video Timeline 28:28- No, you are wrong. Diana was not “all wrapped up in herself”, she just wanted a faithful husband!
I understand that perspective. It's widely believed that she was seeking genuine love and fidelity in her marriage.
That is a typical remark of Junor's - IMHO she's a poisonous witch.
@@MegaMesozoic A poisonous witch who makes her living denigrating Diana.
when did you meet diana ? i am not a troll .
They were both damaged goods, she wanted a strong Father figure, he wanted a strong supportive Matriarch - the relationship was doomed from the start, neither party is solely to blame......
Charles didn't want a wife, he wanted a mommy who would pat him on the head and put his fingerpaintings on the fridge. Instead, he got a shy, sensitive girl (Diana) who expected him to be a husband, and who had legendary charisma (thus taking the attention off off him). He couldn't handle it.
It's true that relationships can be challenging, especially under the spotlight. Different expectations and personalities can create difficulties.
I have read multiple stories about how Diana was very different in private and had mental problems. I don’t think she ever loved Charles either, she wanted to be Queen
In the beginning @@scott4600
Charles is a member of the WEF and I think he is absolutely mad
Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Mad and bad 👿👺
That's mild,off his rocker more like sad he was married to a genuine lady .
👍👍👍👍I agree with You! Greetings from Vienna 🇦🇹
I think you need to have lived with a person to know if they are mad or not and even then it is difficult because you may just be witnessing a response.
That’s BS. Charles never gave Dianna a chance. He kept Camilla in the side the whole time. Shameful.
We also recommend other documentaries on our channel. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Why do people think they know the whole story? Diana was a proper handful before Charles. She also knew Charles and Camilla were close, but she thought she could be Queen of Hearts, Queen of England, but she was too immature and not intelligent enough to do it the 'right' way!!
@@joannajones3833 Bottom line he was not faithful to his vows. He was calling Camilla even on their honey moon. She married an old man who believed mistresses were a okay with the Church of England. Maybe HE should have done it the 'right'way.
Blame the family…not him…..Camilla was already there and he had no choice other than marry someone else. Diana was beautiful adorable but not mature and extremely manipulative… she was a child in love with the idea of becoming a queen thinking he would finally stay with her…. And he is spoiled as expected…..
In your pea brain, did you ever understand bearing a false witness?
Even Queen Elizabeth described Charles as "hopeless".......hence her refusal to stand aside.
The dynamics within the royal family can be complex and subject to various interpretations. Queen Elizabeth's views on her son Charles and her decision-making remain private matters, often subject to speculation or interpretation by different sources. However, any such descriptions or statements are often part of broader narratives and discussions about the royal family.
She refused to abdicate because that is not how the British monarchy works. She also was old enough to remember the abdication of Edward VIII, and no doubt she felt it would be irresponsible.
Charles seems to have been doing very well, so I doubt most people would agree he was hopeless.
@@Official_Royalworld thank you, artificial intelligence bot.
actually is her coronation speech Elizabeth declared that whether her reign was short or long, it would be for her entire life
Yes
That 'He's hopeless' comment from his mother was highly likely said in anger
At least Charles didn’t manage to sink as many of his allied fleet as his uncle. Mountbatten was promoted above his ability to keep him out of harms way.
Thanks for your comment and have a look at other documentaries on our channel! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Only because they didn't give him the opportunity 😂
Quite happy to get out of India asap and leave the tragedy of partitian behind him.
The Provos sunk him. ( With a ring of permanency about it.)
he abused those poor boys at the orphanage
A friend was at Gordonstoun at the same time as Charles. He was generally regarded as being irredeemably thick, and not approachable. I incline to being thick myself but at least I know it.
Thank you for sharing that insight. Everyone has their own experiences and perceptions. Prince Charles attended Gordonstoun, and while opinions may differ, we appreciate your perspective and thank you for your comment. 👍🏽❤️🎬
I have thought him to probably be fairly easily manipulated by highly intelligent people with power and access.
Name me ONE successful alumnus of Gordonstoun who was a contemporary of the then Prince. The school, in those days, was a dumping ground for the idiot sons of the local lairds. It was notorious for an "eat nails, spit rust" toxic masculinity that manifested itself in a lot of very nasty bullying. The Prince would have been much better off at Eton, and it is telling that he sent his sons there, and not to "Colditz with kilts".
Charles continues to give the irredeemably thick impression.
@@neilmcbeath954 kilts, with or without underwear. But that would be another chapter entirely 😮
I watched a film. There was one line in that film, the protagonist says, "only the rich can make this world conform to their delusions." He could be a serial killer. He would still be king if he wants and the whole elite would cover it up, justify it and make it go away or make it normal.
Thanks for your comment, and we have more documentaries on our channel for you. 👍🏽❤️🎬
One only has too look at his brother Andrew .
Time for the monarchy to retire.
Glad you enjoyed the film! Stay tuned for more! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Yes
The usurpers....
Miss Queen Diana
I agree. They are very unnecessary
Yet again people who should know better carp on about the title Defender of the Faith. It was given to Henry the eighth by the pope for a treatise against Martin Luther and the Protestant movement. That he kept it after the break with Rome is just another example of his need for power.
I don't know what history you are studying but Henry VIII split from the Catholic Church so he could steal all the MONEY from Britian's Catholic churches, since he spent too much, oh and wanted to get married again.
Thank you for your input! We appreciate the historical context you've provided. It's always enriching to delve into the historical intricacies surrounding titles and their evolution. If you have any more insights to share, we're all ears!
Yes it was a title conferred on him by a church he no longer recognised so he should have ceased to use it since he abandoned the authority which bestowed it.
@@jasminbrown1187 Confused here what has why he split from the church got to do with the title defender of the faith?
He is Head of the Church of England. Without Diana dying he would not have been able to marry Camilla at that time@@TinaJuko
I never knew he was a religous rebel. If he could just stop pushing for digital ID as the answer for everything, i might be sympathetic to this portrayal of him. That being said, I'm from the U.S. and think the whole monarchy thing is insane.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Different perspectives on digital ID exist, and we appreciate your input from across the pond.
Thank goodness every day that you are a citizen of a Republic . Not the subject of a monarchy . I think that the Royal family need to stay in some way . But, with much less privileged and that they recognise citizenship of the British people . That they are NOT subject to them.
The day we care about a yank's opinion on a 1200 year old tradition is.... not today
@@myamdane6895 You cared enough to reply, so...
He's a member of the highly dangerous World Economic Forum. The digital ID is part of their agenda being pushed on ALL free countries and will cause a massive takeover of our rights and freedoms by totalitarianism. Has to be rejected at all cost or we WILL eventually come under a Communist regime.
Why do we bother with them? Dressing up with crowns and ermine cloaks, makes them look like extras in a Gilbert and Sullivan production.
Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look! 👍🏽❤️🎬
They reinvented themselves and changed their surname as to suppress and hide the fact they're German. If it wasn't for Victoria, they'd be even more German than they already are. The Queen Mum was the main influence.
Why oh why did he wear those purple trousers at his coronation - a mix up at the dry cleaners? makes me wonder if a Prince Charming character in a theatre somewhere had to wear a purple jacket with black trousers.
@@ReviewsChannel-e4r
They changed their surname to show that they were not "German", that they were British. They did it to publicly cut ties. Anyone who has read Royal history knew what their house name had been previously.
His royal confidante was Jimmy Savile. Says it all. Never mind everything Diana.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. We recommend other documents on our channel. 👍🏽❤️🎬
What kind of mentor tells the guy not to treat women too well?
A w ⚓️
Men all men, must treat women beautifully
Absolutely, all mentors should encourage treating everyone, especially women, with kindness and respect. There's no excuse for anything less. Thanks for your comment!
@@Official_Royalworld
His mentor was clearly jealous of his ability to pull women and wanted to wreck his life.
Jealous old man
I can't comment on this specific case but I think a man should always treat women with chivalry but remember that he IS the Man and wear the trousers accordingly.@@Official_Royalworld
Exactly. Bad instructor ...
But his father or mother were completely absent.
Very sad, lonely, forsaken, traumatic childhood.
Imagine, being born in a fish bowl surrounded by cameras. Every move you make, every word you speak is observed, recorded, critiqued, and judged. This is the Twilight Royal Zone. It would drive anyone a little bonkers.
Absolutely, the constant scrutiny can be overwhelming and surely takes a toll on anyone's mental state. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. We recommend other documents on our channel. 👍🏽❤️🎬
If Charles would of been a decent husband to Diana. She would of not had the mental and emotional issues. She was nieave and full of the farytail world of castles knights, Cinderella.
@@eilenekellogg-ki2brTwo most mismatched person, both need love and emotional security which neither can offer the other partner .They marry for the wrong reason, at least they produce William .
The fish bowl can be daunting but none of them have any problem with the wealth and privilege.
Which is why Monarchy and power (super weath) is madness that breeds more madness.
You could see early on the children were left with nannies. The Queen put her love for the monarchy above her children
The balancing act between royal duties and family life can be a challenging one. While some royal children have been raised with nannies, the decisions made by the royal family regarding child-rearing can stem from various factors, including tradition and the demands of their roles.
There are kids who are abused throughout childhood, so yeah they missed their Mum, but in the end understood the role their Mum was born into. Could have been way worse couldn't it.
I think they all turned out ok, bit spoilt, but you can see Prince WIlliam is way more grounded and for and of the people, like Catherine.The Monarchy will change for the better when they are crowned, though I love KCII and QCC, they are doing a great job all things considered.
It's called duty.
She was a Queen end off. Delia Morris
She didn't have to.She was queen and could have demanded several hours of each day be put aside for her children.This, also, would have been a marvelous example to parents in her nation. This is what Diana did, and her children loved her for it. The sad part is also that Phillip was so remote and cold.
I just hate that such an undeserving man gets to have his cake and eat it. And have his subjects( yeah, they are named like that for a reason) go on applaud his homicidal being. Diana didn’t deserve what they did to her.
Thank you for expressing your thoughts. We understand your concerns and appreciate your perspective. We aim to focus on positivity and respect for everyone in our community. Your support means a lot to us.
Did you know the couple well? Or merely watch the roman de clef THe Cown on TV? In fact did you actually KNOW either of them or their circles?
@@jardinekelso Calm down, learn to spell words correctly & stop being so pedantic. There’s lots of information in the public domain regarding the relationship between Chaz & Di, including Chaz’s famous statement about what is love any way. The Royal Family has zero usefulness in the 21 century. The Queen was one of the wealthiest women in the country. Return the wealth to the British people & let’s build a fit-for-purpose National Health Service. Stop being so sycophantic, you’ll corrode your soul.
The Queen was one of the wealthiest in the World not just country!
Wow, so triggered about a bunch of inbreds! 😳
My 8 year old daughter wrote him a letter on her own. The only thing I did was put on the envelope. I don't read her personal correspondence.
He wrote her back a real nice letter and signed it. It meant a lot to her.
On that basis alone, I find him to be a very decent man.
She writes to famous people a lot and most don't write back.
Thank you for watching and for sharing your story. Stay tuned for more captivating content!
Having a cheater as defender of all faiths is the quickest way to atheism.
Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Yep
Agree.
Henry VIII. The Anglican Church was created by a cheater and is still extant.
Embrace the orthodox faith ❤
Don't know why anyone would disagree with his views on architecture or conservation.
Appreciate your perspective! It's great to see alignment on matters like architecture and conservation. Different viewpoints enrich the conversation, though. We also recommend other documentaries on our channel.
Exactly
Indeed
@@Official_Royalworld I won't be watching anything else on your channel after this. Clicking "don't recommend channel" next time it appears.
He is definately not mad on those subjects
Giving a crown to the side piece hasn't been so offensive since Henry VIII
That comparison surely doesn't paint a flattering picture!
If this comment does not paint a flattering picture; it’s only because Charles III is a very unappealing person, in and of himself.
Should never have been allowed to happen. Absolute insult imo.
Most 80's architecture is horrendous (in my view).. so Be praise KC😎
Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
I like the way Charles percieves the world. King Charles. Interesting time to mpost this
Opinions about Prince Charles and his worldview differ widely. The prospect of his future reign as King Charles III brings varied perspectives and discussions. Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look! 👍🏽❤️🎬
I'm not a fan of the monarchy, however, he's right in regards to architecture AND his views on medicine - doctor's SHOULD be treating people as a whole, which includes emotionally, spiritually and physically. The Gerson therapy (which includes coffee enemas) is well known and extremely effective, as said by Albert Schweitzer, right at the beginning when Dr Max Gerson formulated it.
I see your point. Treating patients comprehensively, addressing emotional and spiritual aspects alongside physical health, is increasingly recognized in medicine. Alternative therapies like the Gerson therapy have gained attention, although their effectiveness is often debated within the medical community.
The part I disagreed with having people HAVE to seek homeopathic cures first BEFORE accepted medical procedures. As someone who had cancer come on very quickly, it was the fast diagnosis that saved my life. Charles is NOT a doctor and should have stayed in his own lane. I’m glad doctors came out so strongly against him-surprising him, to put patients FIRST, rather than ‘saving Britain money.
@@judywright4241
well if you think Doctors are 'always right' you are mistaken.
they are not and need to maintain the status quo or they will be voting themselves out of their jobs.
People decide whats right for them.....
You get to choose
and that will be different depending on
who
what
where
when
I have faith in myself .....
and occasionaly a Doctor
He was also right about Aliens!! This man is before his time, NOT MAD!!!!
Oh palease
Wow, he is so right about medicine. We do need to treat the body and soul.
Thank you for your comment. 👍🏽❤️🎬
For the soul? A GP? 😮
True
I'd prefer the state stay away from my soul.
We also know NOW, that he was right about aliens flying saucers too!! I think he is a little bit before his subjects times!! I love him!!
Other than the coffee enemas, I don't see how any of these things make him crazy
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Mental health and its complexities often involve various factors beyond specific practices. Each individual's situation is unique and multifaceted. Your interest in our content is appreciated! 👍🏽❤️🎬
How about his statement of getting rid of 90 percent of the population! That probably includes you and your loved ones! Evil man he is!
Admiring Islam???
He's interested in all religions, not just Islam. That 's not a psychological issue@@katepenk3401
@@katepenk3401 You mean admiring illiteracy and darkness?
He's a fool, unfit to be king, but I guess, with that horse of a wife beside him, they make the perfect 'fool' couple!!
Not a fool. That title belongs to Harry.
But not the most suitable of candidates to be King. ( or God )..
( hugging trees is not in my dictionary as being the right thing to do as are many of his outlandish therapy ideas )..
As to Camilla?…. Age has certainly not been kind. .. and she certainly shouldn’t be Queen!!…
👵🇦🇺🇺🇸
Thank you for your comment. We value diverse opinions. Our channel focuses on discussing topics respectfully and fostering meaningful conversations. If you have further thoughts or insights, we're here to listen.
Mountbatten seemed invasive and domineering if you watch the body language. Charles was like a prisoner. I think its okay he had an open mind. The medical industry is too pharmaceutically led. He seems easily led. The polo group are seedy.
It's interesting to observe body language and social dynamics in these situations. People's actions can indeed reflect various influences and pressures they face, whether in public or private spheres. Thaks for your comment.
Mountbatten! Invasive is putting that on the mild side,maybe Andrew' had a wee talk with him,rear admirald 😂😂😂
Mountbatten liked little boys!
@@pmc8119 Yes he did ...something not talked about enough of this evil man
A King with an insecure mindset (he's not openminded) is a danger to himself and his kingdom.
After the enduring and stable legacy of his mother, this man is the end of us all.
His family has been torn apart because he couldn't love the woman he married and crushed.
Now we're living the consequences of the rising of musslim terror.
Sir Jimmie Sa-VILE
Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look! 👍🏽❤️🎬
May the WEF king be the downfall of the monarchy. He will have his steaks and you will eat insects.
The World Economic Forum's influence and the future of the monarchy might be concerning for some individuals. Changes in global dynamics and societal trends can influence perceptions and expectations about the monarchy's role and direction. Thanks for your comment!
The problem is William is also going that route. No wonder Harry left.
@@heinrichvisser8518Harry is the same, I think Harry was planted in USA to help the elite treasonous pos that have cheated themselves into positions of power destroy America , Harry and mugs have already made remarks about the basic freedoms our founders fought died for...
Sorry you are so poor . Perhaps and perhaps
I agree with Charles about architecture, but not much else.
Thanks for your comment, and we have more documentaries on our channel for you. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Yes, beautiful, warm, "human like" architecture or ugly, "dead" architecture both affect our psyche very much.
He has also an important point if he thinks it's everybodys own business what modalities they use for health. There is an absurd amount of control going on in a number of directions, while at the same time big pharma gets away with mörder on gigantic scale. It is absurd and horrific actually.
These are basic things anyone can understand.
But it is so unfortunate how Charles thinks the billionaire elite's plans for all of humanity is the way to move forward.
I'm only visiting to say that christening an heir to the British Crown, and for the recipient to not assume one of his other names, lies somewhere between Tempting Fate or Trying the Furies.
That's an intriguing perspective, although traditional naming conventions can carry significance in royal families.
I wish Canada would remove the Royal Family as their ceremonial Head of State. We are all grown up now and no longer a colony of the British, nor do we possess any longer that colonial mentality. We can decide on our own affairs, manage our own resources and direct our own future. The Royals are an expensive frivolity and have no further rational meaning or purpose for us. We cringe when they come here for one of their "Look Us Over Tours" with the horrendous costs we have to bear for their visits, to give them gifts they don't need and just to hear them make irrelevant, forgettable and meaningless statements. I noticed that on the last visit here by Charles, the reaction by the public here was mostly hostile, so his appearances were very selective and limited to 3 very small controlled stops. Also noticed that the few members of the public that did meet him, they refused to bow to him as per protocol. The Royals' relationship with Canada has been mostly of an exploitive nature, which we now recognize. I and many people here, are ready to cut our ties with the Royal Family and declare ourselves as a Republic. We would not notice any change in how the government operates in Canada if they were removed. Let the Brits keep and pay for them if they enjoy and appreciate the occasional Jewelry & Costume Shows, all the while a large number of their Royal Subjects freeze to death every winter and struggle with food poverty.
Your perspective on Canada's relationship with the Royal Family is thought-provoking. Many share similar sentiments about the relevance and expenses tied to such ceremonial roles. Perspectives on the Royal Family's visits and their impact are varied, and many are considering alternative directions for the country's governance. We also recommend to have a look at the rest of documentaries on our channel! 👍🏽❤️🎬
You oink without us you would not have been a nation I know Canada trades with Moscow when real world has sanctions on Russia owning to evil war they have trust on Ukraine and its Crimea. So what else are you up to.?
Well, I think your colonial duties are NOT done with. I suppose, you see this incorrectly.
How many indigenous children accompanied Charles this time to Britain ... ?
One of the last time Queen Elizabeth came they were 300. Never to be seen (or heard) of again ...
(That what I call cultivating sources of "fresh meat".)
This is an old documentary rehashed, but still insightful.
Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Why people crave mundane normality at all times is beyond my mad mind!
Thanks for your comment and have a look at other documentaries on our channel! 👍🏽❤️🎬
I cannot imagine all of the trauma damage that has been done to the children who are growing up as royals. Everyone thinks they have it made, with everything money could buy. But they do not have the love and consistent attention of loving parents. They aren't allowed authenticity, even after they are crowned. These families seem so incredibly dysfunctional, as far back as the monarchy goes. Look at how many people have suffered irreparable harm, or even death, all because Prince Charles was not allowed to marry the love of his life. I feel compassion for Charles and Camilla, and I am glad they finally were allowed to get married. I just wish that King Charles and Queen Camilla would use their position of power to make changes in the archaic expectations placed on the young royals, and allow them to follow their passions, both in relationships and in pursuit of their interests and talents.
Your empathy toward the challenges faced by the royal family is understandable. The pressures they encounter and the scrutiny they endure are complex aspects of their lives. Encouraging positive changes within the royal family structure is a perspective many share. Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
It's a job once they are adults. They can low-key just as Beatrice and Eugenie have.
Princess Diana said they aren’t humans
There is worse trauma than absent parents.
@@zed4225Yes, much worse, and I am speaking from experience.
The only thing that bothers me is Charles' preoccupation with the occult. We now have someone who is both the head of the Church of England and also a member of the Magic Circle. We can't serve two masters.
Thanks for being a part of our audience and for sharing your thoughts. 💫We recommend you to explore more captivating documentaries on our channel.🎬
Very good man talking to plants good gardeners do
Charles' ideas are all inspired by the one world government, one world religion, smart cities etc where you will be monitored, tracked and traced 24/7.
Prince Charles has been vocal about various global issues, including environmental sustainability and community development. While his ideas may encompass global cooperation, attributing specific intentions or beliefs requires careful consideration and analysis of his statements and actions.
Nope only a one world order for this wicked demon.
Actually, Charles is not that crazy when it comes to his medicinal beliefs. It would be typical of a conventional doctor to poo poo anything that he says if it isn’t along the lines of what the pharmaceutical companies say, but then we know after all the mess that the medical industry has created that some people don’t trust them. There is nothing wrong with holistic medicine. But of course, it conflicts with conventional medicine ideas. And let’s face it not all conventional medicine works. Just think about how many people have died taking pharmaceuticals. It’s staggeringly high and the number two killer next to heart disease. There are other things that he does that I do not agree with at all. But like with most people, you can’t agree with everything they do.
Agree with you here.👍
You've raised a valid point about differing medical beliefs. Holistic medicine often clashes with conventional approaches, and people's mistrust in certain medical practices is understandable. It's true, not all conventional medicine works, and there are concerns about pharmaceuticals' effects. Everyone has opinions and not all align on every aspect. Also, we recommend other documentaries on our channel.
Medicine is tested for years before it goes out to the public. Those 'alternative medicines ' are actually alternatives to medicine that work!
@@oxcart4172
wait what...
Testing over years?
Where have you been?
@elizabethferguson7002
Well, this is from the Cancer UK website, but what so they know?
"There is no typical length of time it takes for a drug to be tested and approved. It might take 10 to 15 years or more to complete all 3 phases of clinical trials before the licensing stage. But this time span varies a lot.
There are many factors that affect how long it takes for a drug to be licensed"
Appears nothing has changed with Charles !
Thanks for your comment, and we have more documentaries on our channel for you. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Had mixed feelings about Charles until I saw a video of him talking randomly to some trail bikers on the Balmoral estate. His genuine interest in people became evident to me. Seeing him as an approachable human being was quite reveling in a very postive way.
It's great to hear about your positive experience seeing a different side of Charles. Moments like these can offer a unique perspective on public figures. Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Relatable? He's going to make us all eat fake meat! Do you honestly think he will be eating it....
Don’t believe everything you see some are made to fool people
Yeah, Jimmy Savile, his bestie, was also so much interested in people, wasn't he? Such a charitable person. Not.
dont let that fool you.....appearing to be insympatico to the common man........
Charles is a tortured soul. I don't want to live his life a single day. Not even as King. I do feel sorry for him.
Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look! 👍🏽❤️🎬
When you came to his marriage to Diana, the narrator didn't even mention her name. Incredibly disrespectful.
👍🏽❤️🎬
Van der Post, despite his Dutch name, never showed himself much - or even at all - in the Netherlands, nor are his works - books etc - much to be seen there. In fact, I’m not sure whether they have even been published in Dutch. There was a reason for that. Too many people in the Netherlands knew a thing or two about his conduct in the Japanese POW camp where they were with him for 3 years or so. They kept mostly, but not entirely, quiet about it. But if Van der Post had sought the limelight in the Netherlands as much as he did in the English speaking world, they’d probably have opened up. Van der Post seems to have realised that and have decided that discretion was the better option.
Interesting!!! Thank you for posting.
It sounds like there might have been some controversy or information regarding Van der Post's conduct during his time in the Japanese POW camp that was known to some people but not widely discussed. This could have influenced his decision to avoid seeking attention or publishing his works in the Netherlands.
Oh, what interesting incidents happened in Japanese POW camps with van der Post ... ?
This video is an unaltered rerun of an old video a few years old before Charles became king. He had extremely odd friends including Jimmy Saville.
Charles looked odd himself with his ‘talking to plants’ episode, and now that he is King and accordingly thanks to Henry the Eighth, Head of the Church of England; while not believing anything except a vague idea of ‘defender of all faiths’ several of which frankly totally conflict with each other.
Such as the Muslim faith which seriously conflicts with Christianity. They are mutually exclusive, you cannot believe in both.
The video showcases older footage, shedding light on aspects of Charles' past. His diverse friendships and spiritual roles have generated various opinions and interpretations among people. The complexities of faith and its intersection with different beliefs often lead to diverse perspectives on religious compatibility.
@@Official_Royalworld Islam and Christianity are exclusive. It is not possible to believe in both. The absurdity of Charles thinking he can defend them and any other faith, all at the same time is really ridiculous. Is he defending frankly really evil faiths also?
Chuckie is pure evil.
Oh, Penny Junor, has always been so far up Charlie’s jacksie I’d quite forgotten what she looks like. She’s his mouthpiece, I wonder how Mrs Windsor likes that.
It seems like Penny Junor’s close relationship with Charles might influence her perspectives. Thanks for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel.
This thing is not my king.
Thanks for your comment, and we have more documentaries on our channel for you. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Not mine either.
All should bow and pay homage & tax to His Royal Highness King Charles. The Bravest Leader of Our Times.
only Christianity is a faith, theologically - all the other ones are religions 😊
Herr Karl von Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha is also a devoted disciple of Klaus Schwab, a relation deluded and dangerous enough to undergo careful scrutineering.
It's important to critically examine anyone in positions of influence, especially when their associations and beliefs raise concerns.
KC is apparently an intelligent yet somewhat odd person with a great sense of humor and acting ability who also seems to care about some worthy things.
That's an interesting perspective on KC. People's diverse qualities often contribute to their unique personalities and impact on the world. Thanks for your comment, and we have more documentaries on our channel for you. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Intelligent? Has he not been the heir to the throne, he never would have made it to University...bad grades!!!
He's a frigg'n criminal... wickedness
If intelligence should ever be measured by such psychotic need to gather infinite sums of money no matter what sociological damage it does.
Not many think so - its just that fraction of a per cent with all the wealth & power that do.
Reasonably ? - theres potential danger related to the way he might not be able to control hatred of the people that have never liked him & he may inflict great revenge.
Thats exactly the image being constantly projected by them.
Its all very well managed.
You need to look at information from other sources if you want to know exactly what he , and other members of the RF are involved in.
.
Charles is in love with his cheater Camilla 😂 they're both abnormal
Thanks for your comment, and we have more documentaries on our channel for you. 👍🏽❤️🎬
She is no cheater .
OHHHH YES SHE IS !!!@@kevinjamesparr552
Without a shred of a doubt, I can sum up Charles, Charles & Di, Charles & Chamila Easily!!! Charles was a mommas boy. Always and Extremely! If he could have breast fed to her majesty’s death, he would have! Plus he’s just as much a Narcissist. Dianna, a beautiful soul, wouldn’t focus her attention directly on him. She was the “People’s Princess”. She loved and cared for everyone. Especially those suffering. Insert her polar opposite, Camilla, who has and will always focus all her love and attention on Charles. The “Charles princess”. That is why Charles always loved Camilla and couldn’t love Dianna. She would never solely love him alone, nor offer up a lifetime of breastfeeding him his own kool aid. Diana would have been the Absolute Best queen! And Charles knew she would not only put the people before him, she would be so much more epically, monumentally beloved and adored.. perhaps even more so then his own mother.. He, being a narcissistic, sad little man, couldn’t mentally handle it.
… just some friendly, honest and sincere thoughts from Canada. 🇨🇦
Certainly, your insights offer an interesting perspective on the dynamics within the royal family. Everyone sees things a bit differently, and it's fascinating to hear your thoughts from Canada! 🍁
You are the first one who sees him as this self-doubting, self-loathing malignant narcissist.
Very dangerous person, VERY dangerous person.
You speak as if Camilla had no husband nor children to keep her occupied ... is that strange ??
My goodness!!! What a strange, convoluted mind you must have. You have obviously never seriously researched anything that you've commented on here! How could Charles be a momma's boy when he wouldn't see her for months at a time? He also had to wait patiently to shake her hand, while she was greeting others, after being away for months. No, no momma's boy there!! Diana incidentally fell out with almost everyone she knew, her mother, her sisters, her flatmates, her step mother. I've just realised, you know nothing, you're Canadian. That fits!!!
I must also be mad. I identify with many of his ideas and ideals. Though I did get distinctions at A level. You go King Charles , celebrate your uniqueness !
It's common to resonate with certain ideas or values shared by individuals, even if they're unconventional. Embracing diversity in perspectives often leads to a richer understanding of the world. Everyone's uniqueness contributes to a diverse and vibrant society.
@@Official_RoyalworldYes!
Boasting, as an adult, about something as trivial as “distinctions at A level”, certainly doesn’t suggest a well adjusted individual.
Enough of Charles, William is now woke
Thanks for your comment. ❤️🎬
Well, what does a decent malignant narcissist do to his son ... ?
As Prince William is much classier, more educated & more regal than his father I wouldn't be surprised if King Charles would have him eliminated.
Well my dad was at Cambridge University at the same time as Charles. On his 21st birthday my dad made this giant 150 ft banner out of cardboard boxes saying Happy Birthday Charlie. Then my dad's best friend who was at the same campus as him(Trinity college) climbed 2 important 80 ft buildings in the middle of the night and strung it up for him to see from out his window. It made the Daily Telegraph paper at the time. Nice!
That's an amazing and creative birthday gesture! Great to hear about such memorable moments.
He’s not worth risking your life for.
I think he is a brave, intelligent chap with my sense of humour. I am the same age as him and have seen the world change over the years. Respect and discipline are old fashioned these days. I don't know what is happening today but we need strong leadership to guide us through it.
It's interesting to share similar experiences and observations about the changing world. Strong leadership is indeed crucial, especially in navigating uncertain times.
Oh, so you think fidelity is something funny for the crossword puzzle ... 🧩 ?
That's not my sort of humour. Thank you.
A 40:03 @@helgardhossain9038I do not agree with infidelity but he's not the first or the last to indulge in it .He's no better or worse than an AWFUL LOT of men who take a mistress the women may be married or single some are married and they cheat Diana also cheated with married men .He just happened to be Royalty and it became news .But adultery now is just so common bur again I don't condone it in the least I'm just saying he's not the only one not by long chalk. But he was pushed snd pressurised into that marriage.
…but he’s not a leader.
Strong? Strength? Adultery is strong?
He is not fit to be Head of OUR CHURCH ❗
Thanks for your comment and have a look at other documentaries on our channel! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Some parts of service were not done publically. Found that suss as it was usually normal to do so?. Was that parts that head of church disagreed on?. Charles so desperate to marry camilla he bent a lot of rules. He not a honourable man or king, nor one to be head of the church.!
Poor Diana
Glad you enjoyed the film! Stay tuned for more! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Poor humanity accepting or supporting all these fools and maniacs in power!
@@ytusersumone Camilla...was not Mia Carla a vampire?
@@ytusersumoneThey're not the only ones! Do a little research and find out who really runs the US! NOT the president!
@@christiansaint716 You write like you're replying to someone else or you're adding something to my comment which wasn't there 🥴😆
Wonderful Documentary!!!!
Yes
Thanks for your comment!
I agree with his taste on architecture
Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
YES.
A man who loved the Goon show cannot be bad
he is the greatest professional version in history lol but yeah
He sounds a lot like the biblical description of the man with the number 666.
Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Guess takes one to know one
@@Molassed A child like response...as expected.
No, he doesn't.
WICKED!!! How dare you???
I agree with Charles about medicine (excluding the coffee enema because I know nothing about it) architecture and the human soul.
Imagine Trump being king,😂
Glad you enjoyed the film! Stay tuned for more! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Nice way of putting it. Yes it is something that gets you feeling good.Architects are modern steal hard brick and concrete . Not much to say what is nice to see or fits in well . May be a bit back in Edwardian times but my word they had a better England then so why not appeal to better ways today
46:19 the queen is gone, but the monarchy is still here.
Thanks for your comment and have a look at other documentaries on our channel! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Poor Charles , with those big ears and clise together eyes and his finicky nature, I can't imagine anybody finding him attractive. I saw him live close up once, but can't remember if he was short too( at the Anglican Church in Milan ; I sang the descant in an anthem and got a look from him when I hit a high B natural)
Thanks for your comment and have a look at other documentaries on our channel! 👍🏽❤️🎬
A sad comment if you think looks and height are an acceptable way to judge someone.
Did you see Charles before he had the operation to pin back his ears? He was 4 years old when he had the operation, I didn't notice much difference.
5 foot 9 inches . Likes not the lime light .Happy in his gardens is my King and yours
ridiculous, mindless comment!
I did a doubletake on the thumbnail picture because it reminded me of the USA MAD magazine character Alfred E. Neuman.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Also, we recommend other documents on our channel. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Charles needed to be king to maintain the line of succession. It's odd how the line of succession was less stable after Charles' uncle abdicated. Also he needs to stay out of the medical field and leave that to the doctors. Because it's a complete waste to instill coffee via enema.
It's definitely interesting how the line of succession can have its twists and turns. Medical matters can indeed be best left to the professionals. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Actually, curing diabetes, migraines, high blood pressure, MS and various other diseases with fasting and enema should be made more public so patients can CHOOSE an alternative method of treatment (and ultimately cure) of their afflictions compared to the mafia-enforced ineffective medicine from pharmacy companies.
Miss Juno’s comments about lady Di’s shortcomings are preposterous.
Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
I am not a fan of Charles. However his respect for all religions is a good thing. His talk about healing the soul is 100% right. I heard about his farming hobby.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Doesn't everyone talk to their plants?
Glad you enjoyed the film! Stay tuned for more! 👍🏽❤️🎬
I do ,but I don't want to pretend to be a king.
Read the thought provoking book, The Secret Life of Plants. From the 70s? Found it fascinating.
He is unfit for a kingvyet he became king. He even made Camilla queen instead of consort because she was not born as Windsor. I hate to vall her queen. They do not deserve the crown.
Opinions on royal matters can certainly differ. It's important how people perceive royal decisions. Also, we recommend other documentaries on our channel.
She is still the Consort, as she is not of the blood Royal, I e. He marries a princess from another land, she would be a Queen. As far as I'm concerned, Camilla is the Kings Official Mistress Not the Queen Consort.
The Queen Consort is married to the King. Her background has nothing to do with it. We just say Queen as we have done for over 1000 years. Nothing has changed. Read some history. All of Henry VIII’s wives were Queen Consorts including the foreign Princess Catherine. Charles II wife Queen Catherine was a Princess of Braganza.
Prince Charles is NOT brilliant. In fact, he was a mediocre student and his father Prince Phillip was very disappointed in him for various reasons. That said, his ideas are often ignorant and repulsive to those who actually THINK.
Opinions about Prince Charles' intellect and ideas can differ widely among individuals. Personal views about his academic performance and the merit of his ideas often vary based on different perspectives and evaluations. Thanks for your comment!
I find this vlog throughly offensive. I can't imagine how the King and his family will feel about it.
This last year has proved that he is a good king.
Growing up in a fish bowl. I truly feel bad for Charles, the son.
I know many men who lived in fear of disappointing their parents.
Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Every non-royal Chinese person I know has lived that experience. If there is no room for a child to have autonomy for normal development it is unhealthy. Unless the child really wants what parents expect them to become it can create robots unable think for themselves or the pendulum swings the other way becoming so open minded the brains seem to fall out. Blame "well their parents did that to them so its accepted and ok" doesn't make it ok right. Snuffing out the spirit of a child to inherit more generational damage doesn't encourage a better world. It isn't like he is Donald Trump hoping to begin WWIII. He did his duty. He married a woman he didn't love to produce an heir and a spare. Was it his duty to keep trying to feel love for Diana the rest of his life span or people judge him evil? He isn't Jesus Christ perfect, just a human like everyone else. Religious extremists are dangerous whether Muslim, Jew, Christian or Hindu. His privileged life has been mostly a prison. I wish him happiness, peace and wisdom to guide people kindly without a sense of pompous entitlement.
If Charles was intellectually superior to Diana she wouldn't have been able to outwit him at every point. He believes in nonsense because that is his normality, it enabled him to indulge in controversial ideas. The man is a hypocrite, he has no experience or empathy with those who struggle; he is given money from taxpayers (not value for money) while increasing his wealth privately & avoiding taxes he can well afford. He may not of had affection from his parents but that is their way of suppressing emotion; many suffer far greater abuse & neglect. His ideas of homeopathy have no scientific base or even logic. He talks about spirituality but sold weapons to Arab nations. He is a narcissist who criticises architecture while many can't afford the cost of a dingy room to live in. He cynically used Diana to bear an heir before making her life intolerable, suggesting she was unhinged to justify his behaviour. The "firm" is a disgrace to Britain with it's scandals (many hidden), a reminder of colonial shame. It would be better to abolish the outdated, irrelevant & expensive monarchy to become a modern republic.
Your perspective reflects deep-seated concerns about the monarchy's role and individual actions. Discussions around the relevance of the monarchy versus a modern republic often involve diverse viewpoints and evaluations of historical and contemporary actions. Thanks for your comment and have a look at other documentaries on our channel! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Charles is not a bad person. No way is he "Monarch" material tho. Sometimes birthright does not produce a strong leader worthy of a crown. The Princess Royal Anne, would be my choice to be head of the United Kingdom.
It's interesting how different perspectives shape our opinions on leadership. People often have varied views on who might be the best fit for such roles. Thanks for your comment.
We do not need a strong arm man as King today. He is figure head only . Get a strong man and most of us would be shaking . Charles is that old fashioned English Gentleman that suits being King .No ripples of leg over the bed and no worry to anyone he will send us to war again .What do you want a King who leads armies from the front.I have served my nation in war and do not want it ever again .Peaceful King peaceful nation suits me my boy .
Why would someone who randomly plopped out from between a certain pair of legs be the best head of state for Britain ?.
Oh, c'mon, he's just a silly goose. On the other hand those coffeeenema parties he's hosted .,..
Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
He's just like he is because of a crazy upbringing.
At least he respects the climate
Thanks for your observation! Context certainly plays a role in shaping individuals. We're glad to see a focus on important global issues like climate respect. Your insights are appreciated!
@@Official_Royalworld
Thanks!
he is so akward maybe he can mimic a snake too
Glad you enjoyed the film! Stay tuned for more! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Why can you?
She isn’t the Queen, it was a Morganatic marriage, as was offered to and rejected by what eventually became the Windsor’s. She is the consort, a job for which she is well qualified as she has consorted with an awful lot of chaps. So there is no such thing as a Queen Camilla, it’s not an animal that exists.
She IS Queen Camilla, she is consort and it certainly was not a Morganatic marriage. This is nonsense.
I believe Camilla holds the title of Queen Consort, though it's understandable to have differing perspectives on this matter. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Moot point if the King calls her his Queen...she is a Queen. He is King by birth and not by public opinion.
And in your case, there isn't a brain that exists, is there?
Any British Queen who isn't the ruling Monarch, is a Queen Consort to her husband, the King !
Camilla is.
Queen Elisabeth, The Queen Mother was.
So was Queen Mary.
And Queen Alixandra.
Queen Victoria however was The Monarch.
Her husband, Prince Albert was The Prince Consort.
In the Netherlands 3 Queens had Prince Consort husbands.
So did Queen Margrethe of Denmark.
In the future Catherine, Princess of Wales will be Queen Consort to her husband William.
After watching this video I see him in a much better light.
Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look! 👍🏽❤️🎬
same
This video is a propaganda.
🤨🤨🤨
Amazing video, thanks.
Glad you enjoyed the film! Stay tuned for more! 👍🏽❤️🎬
He had a l9ver all the way through- Diana was shattered by Charles infudelity throughout their marriage-( be it for a period emotional/then 31:16 physical- equally harming- " absolute infidelity". at any leve! but oionwlll any decent woman would be shattered by that.
Infidelity undoubtedly takes a heavy toll on any relationship, causing significant emotional distress and pain, regardless of its nature or duration. It can deeply wound trust and emotions in a partnership. 👍🏽❤️🎬
In VIP circles open marriage is normal
@@nicolemurphy2629Tell them.
Monarcy is very dark. Yuk. This too will end. Evil Evil Evil.
Thanks for your comment, and we have more documentaries on our channel for you. 👍🏽❤️🎬
I think you mean you
A man claiming he would like to be a tampax .. needs serious help😮
Thanks for your comment. We encourage respectful discussions here. If anyone needs help, we hope they can find the support they need.
It was Queen Mum whom had promised Earl Spencer that one of his daughters would marry Charles .He had no way out of duty demanded of him .He loved Camilla
There's no substantial evidence to support this claim. Charles' marriage was a personal choice, and his affection for Camilla is well-known.
Yes, this witch (Queen Mother) was the devil in disguise 😈, wasn't she ... ?
Royalist apologist claptrap.
Do you know how much money is pouring into London and wanting to stand outside Buckingham palace and other big family homes that over the years need money for its upkeep ? I care nothing for these people especially charlie boy, he has had a
privilege life but his conduct was atrocious in his behaviour, his moral conduct against this innocent young girl Dianne. He
has done so many things wrong in my eyes. He will have to answer one day for his cruelness to her and other ladies.
But these families especially men like him will have to answer for their stupidity. M. Taha
I agree, he is a horrible, cruel and selfish man.
It's the horses I pity. They display many signs of pain and stress. Their bots are cruel. And as for bearskin hats. Barbaric. Modernise a bit.
Thank you for your comment and we recommend other documentaries on our channel. Have a look!
The financial aspects related to royal palaces and estates are often a topic of discussion. Regarding personal conduct or allegations against individuals, it's essential to be cautious in making claims or accusations without concrete evidence. These matters involve various perspectives and complexities, and they're often the subject of ongoing debate and speculation.
For Christ sake research read updated news .You are so behind the times in that belief .
If his uncle had to abdicate why did he marry a divorced woman and take the throne
Thank you for your comment. 👍🏽❤️🎬
Times have moved on !@@Official_Royalworld
I loved the film reel of Charles clawing mummy's face.😂
Thank you for watching and for sharing your thoughts. Stay tuned for more captivating content!
He is not mad. He is correct.
Thanks for your comment, and we have more documentaries on our channel for you. 👍🏽❤️🎬
🤣🤣🤣🤣
What a despicable hatchet job on the king! Many of the ideas raised (quite one-sidedly) in the video are the reasons I respect Charles. He could do a better job of running the country than the idiots who are currently in charge.
It seems the video's portrayal of the king didn't resonate with your view. Charles' qualities highlighted in the video may align with why you respect him. Everyone holds diverse opinions, and your perspective on his potential leadership stands out. We recommend other videos though!
I think I AM beginning to really like this King!
Glad you enjoyed the film! Stay tuned for more! 👍🏽❤️🎬
The theme of this film is the infidelity of upper class British men. I believe this is the downfall of the white race and the source of the recent decline in the strength of Western countries and the reason for the rise in dictatorial leaders for a weakening race.
Themes in films often provoke varied interpretations. While infidelity might be a theme, attributing societal declines or geopolitical shifts to a single factor can be complex. Societal changes have multifaceted origins and interpretations.
How I wound up having the same anniversary as those two while I was married.
Coincidences can be surprising sometimes. It's interesting how life aligns in unexpected ways. Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
I genuinely believe that Charles is the first true 'philosopher king' we've had since Henry II in the 12th century. He's a far better speaker than his beloved mother, or any other monarch since the age of broadcasting. He has ideas based on deep reflection and humanist values - something most of the world's political leaders are nowadays sorely lacking. Give him a chance, and he will shine!
Thank you for that wonderful comment on our King!!! If people gave it a little thought instead of jumping on the bandwagon, they must surely come to the same conclusion!!!
What about Jimmy Saville???
HELLO
Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
I King Charlie can learn to keep his trap shut; he might do okay as king.
Thanks for your comment! 👍🏽❤️🎬
pointless being king if you keep your mouth shut.
I,d rather they stand him on a trap and I get the privilege of pulling the lever.
I don’t begrudge the Royals for having assistants to help them dress, since their public costumes are so complicated.
Thanks for your comment, and we have more documentaries on our channel for you. 👍🏽❤️🎬
So they can't put clothes on ?
@@1gerard47 They often need to change clothes several times a day, and the military uniforms are extremely complicated. When they go out in public they are scrutinized severely, so if one medal or jewel is worn wrong, the press rakes them over the coals for it.
Suits and dresses? Not every day is trooping the colour
@@temperanceblalock7514they wear them very seldom
Charles's medical knowledge is alot greater than these idiots...
Thanks for your comment and have a look at other documentaries on our channel! 👍🏽❤️🎬
Annne wouldve made a better choice i m sure
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. We recommend other documents on our channel. 👍🏽❤️🎬
I agree.