ST-21 Super Tomcat Squadron vs J-15 Flying Shark Squadron (Naval Battle 74) | DCS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 313

  • @rogerrussell5155
    @rogerrussell5155 2 роки тому +105

    Can the gr destroy the crimea Bridge by cap's bad driving of an ammunition truck?

    • @morganlambley8655
      @morganlambley8655 2 роки тому +13

      It was the moskva submarine returning to port, a bit late. One of the Russians was smoking a bit close to the ammo again

    • @pokeybit
      @pokeybit 2 роки тому +6

      Too many signs to hit on the way there. They'll never make it.

    • @willwozniak2826
      @willwozniak2826 2 роки тому +1

      I would love to see Cap try it.

    • @captainkrazee7726
      @captainkrazee7726 2 роки тому

      Won’t matter. It’s just been hit

    • @evangalinsky2499
      @evangalinsky2499 2 роки тому +4

      @@captainkrazee7726 that's the whole point of the comment lmao

  • @gigaslave
    @gigaslave 2 роки тому +33

    For a venerable airframe, the Tomcat (and Super Tomcat) really are performing well.

  • @Rover200Power
    @Rover200Power 2 роки тому +30

    It's all about the number of missiles. 4 isn't enough without stealth to increase the kill %. A ST-21 by now could have 8 AIM-120 under the fuselage instead of 4 AIM-54.
    The AIM-54 weighs 3 times the AIM-120, it would just require a new launch rail adapter.

    • @Scoobydcs
      @Scoobydcs 2 роки тому +2

      could you make a ter for the amraams? they had 3 and 4 mk82 racks under there

    • @Rover200Power
      @Rover200Power 2 роки тому

      @@Scoobydcs if the aerodynamics on release worked out the weight wouldn't have been an issue.

    • @Scoobydcs
      @Scoobydcs 2 роки тому

      @@Rover200Power yeh, thats the question though

  • @exidy-yt
    @exidy-yt 2 роки тому +15

    Holy crap, BIG props to the sock! He deserves to fill one up tonight for sure! Also love the AI change where winchester planes go home and land, much better and more realistic. Also BIG love for the Super Tomcat, my dream warplane that never was. Thank you for putting it together Cap, and I hope to see more battles featuring it!

  • @wheelbasemedia5814
    @wheelbasemedia5814 2 роки тому +2

    Great timing for this:
    50 years ago today, on Oct. 8, 1972, the Grumman F-14A Tomcat, entered U.S. Navy service with Fighter Squadron 124 (VF-124) ‘Gunfighters’.

  • @Spartanhook117
    @Spartanhook117 2 роки тому +22

    Yes Cap, we do love these long-range fights! Great job in bringing us the ST-21.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +9

      Pleasure

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 2 роки тому +4

      @@grimreapers do you think you could give The ST-21 Thrust Vectoring? Something like F-15STOL/MTD & Grinnelli F-22 would be EPIC!
      😅 Btw couple GR flying ST-21 Super Tomcats VS couple GR flying F-15STOL/MTD would be cool af! Perhaps first round guns only then Fox2 Dogfight🙏

  • @shmevan_
    @shmevan_ 2 роки тому +8

    Gonna say this before watching, thank you Cap and everybody involved in making these naval battles and wargames happen. Making brand new missiles and planes while making it as realistic as possible isn't easy and I just want you to know how much we the viewers appreciate it!

  • @SledgeHammer43
    @SledgeHammer43 2 роки тому +5

    One major thing you missed Cap is the Bubble cannipy just like the 15E. The longest AIM 54 kill was by a Iranian F14A the took out 2 Mig 21s with one AIM 54 at 134 NM. This occurred during the Iran Iraq war. The 2 migs were caught going out over the Gulf heading in the direction of Iranian Oil platforms.

  • @yeeeehaaawbuddy
    @yeeeehaaawbuddy 2 роки тому +2

    "Nope, I'm landing!"
    When there's no juvenile noise coming from this dude, his confidence matches results, and you gotta respect that. How many people have been shot down into a successful carrier landing?

  • @2001TMA1
    @2001TMA1 2 роки тому +15

    Could it be that the AIM-120 in DCS doesn't have a proximity fuse? There were plenty of near hits where in reality the proximity fuse would have ignited the warhead.

    • @montys420-
      @montys420- 2 роки тому

      I'm sure this happens in DCS

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 2 роки тому +3

      Lol AIM-120D 120 miles PL-15 120 miles
      If you remember reading earlier on just a few months ago open source data clearly stated 120 miles! Why did it drop and has anyone else freakin noticed this??

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 2 роки тому +3

      Lmao and AIM-260 JATM Range is 180 miles! Mach 5!

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +3

      It def has proxy fuse, we tested that. We also have to factor in multiplayer internet latency, what we see is sometimes slightly behind what is actually happening.

  • @Davros-vi4qg
    @Davros-vi4qg 2 роки тому +3

    Naval Air Battle. Boom, booms, fire and flame. With a Sploosh at the end for variety!

  • @dmsdmullins
    @dmsdmullins 2 роки тому +3

    I'm sure most of us already know this but public data on these weapons (even from 20-30 years ago) are guaranteed to be inaccurate to real-world performance. For instance I worked E-3B and C AWACS and 100% promise (as I have seen first hand with my own eyeballs) that published information on detection range and other performance factors, including DCS's modeling, are way off it's actual capabilities and detection ranges. I'm sure some weapons are fairly close just through case studies of engagements in history, but I'd be willing to bet most weapons in DCS under-perform compared to their real-world counterparts. Government likes to put out vastly under-rated figures for obvious reasons.

  • @iainburgess8577
    @iainburgess8577 2 роки тому

    @32.00 (ish) Cap was talking about how there's no dogfights in modern, networked missile air combat engagement without stealth.
    Reminded me of the stealth on stealth Sims & how they often bDo come to a dogfight, and the specs Japan set for the 6th gen fighter they're trying to develop; stealth, thrust vectoring, etc.

  • @guillaumevalli5031
    @guillaumevalli5031 2 роки тому +1

    OMG Sock Landing... you couldn't script that. Amazing.

  • @vipondiu
    @vipondiu 2 роки тому +2

    The only thing better than a Tomcat; a Super-tomcat! Great job bringing it to life! Now do a MiG-31 Vs SuperTomcat, the Battle of Interceptors!

  • @Stinger522
    @Stinger522 2 роки тому +2

    The ships saved this game for the Tomcats. There was a great amount of back and forth before both sides wore each other down.
    I would still go for the Super Hornet and F-35 combo. The ST-21 may be faster but it takes up so much damn space on the carrier.

  • @Rychlik85
    @Rychlik85 2 роки тому +3

    Hello where can I download aim 120d mod??? Because i have that missile in f22 mod, and i want to use it with tomcat and f 18 and f16. pls if you can help me send me link

  • @charlienash1050
    @charlienash1050 2 роки тому +9

    Please do more ST21, that would be absolutely fantastic

  • @leongao5120
    @leongao5120 2 роки тому +2

    hero of soviet america 22:55

  • @SledgeHammer43
    @SledgeHammer43 2 роки тому +1

    The AST was The advanced strike tomcat. It was still a fighter but the body supported more lift 5% more. The canopy was like that of a F15 to improve pilot vision. That AIM 120-D struck a drone over the gulf of Mexico at 120+ miles. Please do not quote me on that. It was launched from a F 15C at 39,000 ft

  • @BigLug01
    @BigLug01 2 роки тому +2

    Man I really wish the ST-21 and 22 series of air frames went into service. The final version even would've been stealth, and there were multiple variants, including dedicated air to air, dedicated air to ground, and multi-role versions.

  • @Scott11078
    @Scott11078 2 роки тому +2

    As a former 7th fleeter who had plenty of "interesting" encounters with the PLA. They're fucking pathetic.

  • @christophero55
    @christophero55 2 роки тому +8

    Great video! The Super Tomcat would have been continuously upgraded past the year 99 though wouldn't it? Just like the Super Hornet was. Wouldn't an upgraded, 2022 version of the Super Tomcat be worth having a go at this scenario? = AESA radar with potentially very BIG advantage over other 4th Gen fighters with AESA, Tomcats HUGE radome! More surface space for the radar means more T/R modules means more powerful radar. A Super Tomcat with an advanced AESA radar might have the most powerful radar of any 4th or even 5th gen fighter in existence! I'd love to see that.

    • @josephkugel5099
      @josephkugel5099 2 роки тому +3

      You are 100% correct, the ST-21 would basically be an F-14D on steroids with Block 3 Super Hornet avionics but Tomcat sized with the most powerful AESA radar ever put into a fighter, then add an upgraded Phoenix missile AIM-54D & AIM-12D & AIM-9X and more speed and more range and better dogfighting capability, i give props to the guys for making this video but it must be made CLEAR that the Tomcat used was at best only 10% as capable of what would have been flying in 2022 and the Chinese would have been absolutely decimated, Hell the F-14D could have beaten these guys without to much trouble as long as it was modeled CORRECTLY!!!!!!!!

    • @jjhilldodger
      @jjhilldodger 2 роки тому

      I do know a limitation of F-14s is they only support an older protocol for communicating with data link/awacs. I agree that it would be better on paper but in a fight where enemies and friendlies get mixed in, I would worry about friendly fire concerns.

    • @josephkugel5099
      @josephkugel5099 2 роки тому

      @@jjhilldodger That is common generalization about the Tomcat and is only partly true, the F-14D which entered service in the early 90s had LINK-16 and a fully updated cockpit suite and could easily identify friend from foe, the problem was that since the DOD wouldn't upgrade the entire Tomcat fleet it meant that the majority of Tomcat's were still the F-14A/B Types and they had the older electronics with the issue you are referring to, that being said the ST-21 was actually an upgrade of the F-14D and would have easily been the most advanced fighter in theater.

    • @Optimaloptimus
      @Optimaloptimus 2 роки тому

      @@josephkugel5099 Yes, and take a good guess why they refused to upgrade said useless Tomcat fleet. COST.

    • @josephkugel5099
      @josephkugel5099 2 роки тому

      @@Optimaloptimus Oh that's brilliant, you do realize that EVERY fighter in the world requires regular upgrades so that it remains relevant and those costs are factored in to deploying such weapons don't you???, it was precisely the fact that the Tomcat was NOT regularly upgraded like ALL the others that it seemed to cost more but not when calculated over time, the Tomcat received its only REAL upgrade in 1991 when it became the F-14D, For those of you that are math impaired that's 17 long years without a proper upgrade and when the F-14D hit the scene it was anything but useless unless you consider being the deadliest fighter in the world useless.

  • @jamison884
    @jamison884 2 роки тому +1

    Nice unexpected video. Next time Grump fires a salvo, you should call out "There's a Grumpy Super Dumpy!"

  • @LynnetteJJW
    @LynnetteJJW 2 роки тому +1

    Oh boy. Cant wait for the F/A-XX. Bringing back the heavy naval aircraft!

  • @tituslaronius
    @tituslaronius 2 роки тому +4

    Yes! More Tomcats is never a bad idea! ST21 is my favourite by far!

  • @Anarchy_420
    @Anarchy_420 2 роки тому +2

    Incredible Mod! Freakin brilliant!👍👍
    ST-21 Super Tomcat VS F-15STOL/MTD Dogfight🙏
    ST-21 Needs Thrust Vectoring!🙏

  • @thegungadfly8930
    @thegungadfly8930 2 роки тому +1

    Cap has this hysterical laugh that reminds me of 1970’s horror movies.

  • @andregabrieltimcang8182
    @andregabrieltimcang8182 2 роки тому +3

    if we going in science fiction section now, might as well do an F45 Killswitch VS SU75 Checkmate simulation CAP.

  • @RBaker-ku4hp
    @RBaker-ku4hp 2 роки тому +1

    Super awesome, guys!! Now can we request the ST-21 and AT-21 in a full anti-air and anti-ship battle? Maybe add in the AGM-158C??

  • @dexlab7539
    @dexlab7539 2 роки тому +1

    AWESOME on FIRE LANDING Sock!!😂🤣 😂

  • @aa1944-k2r
    @aa1944-k2r Рік тому

    OMG DCS is like a movie, there are so many details in it...tomcat looks so good it feels like top gun

  • @John_SlideRule_Bullay
    @John_SlideRule_Bullay 4 місяці тому +1

    Was watching some content on the Super Tomcat and YT recommended this video. How Cool! Grumpnik LOL! Video Valued by Valued Viewer - Fly Army 🚁

  • @Hot1765
    @Hot1765 2 роки тому +3

    They look like a bunch of TWA airlines planes!!

  • @kenulvantwest8804
    @kenulvantwest8804 2 роки тому +2

    The ST21 would've had 6 AMRAAMs on the belly, bringing the total to 8.

  • @Shockwave00108
    @Shockwave00108 2 роки тому +6

    As a Hornet guy, I'm glad the F/A 18 E/F has become what it is today. But it would be cool if the Tomcat got the same love that the Super Hornet has gotten! Would you perhaps do a video with the ST-21 and new block three Super Hornets? P.S. I saw a video from Growling Sidewinder about enhanced AI combat abilities, would be cool to see your thoughts on it :)

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      Yup we have seen the difference. they do fight a lot better and are harder to kill. They are still pretty "stupid" though as they dont really understand the battlefield.

  • @armandorodrigues144
    @armandorodrigues144 Рік тому

    the improved radar was to be a hybrid between the one from F-15Es and the AN/PG-71 from F-14Ds
    The War Zone goes further and describes a hypothetical MLU upgrade with technology that has been introduced in the latest F-15 variants plus HMD and other things, which would simply give commonality to other air frames in service with the US Armed Forces - AESA, IRST targeting pods, IFF, decoys, etc -.

  • @TheAmbex
    @TheAmbex 2 роки тому

    Damn the super tomcat is a sexy beast. I never knew they existed, but the F14 was my favorite plane growing up.

  • @tmytyson
    @tmytyson 2 роки тому +4

    Because I want GR to do extra needless work it would be fun to see another alternate reality fight where the Air Force selected the YF23 and X32 instead of the 22 and 35 respectively. I doubt performance would change much but it'd look interesting.

    • @ewanmartin4099
      @ewanmartin4099 2 роки тому

      Same

    • @krismurphy7711
      @krismurphy7711 2 роки тому

      Then I want to see the F20 modeled and fought!!

    • @Rover200Power
      @Rover200Power 2 роки тому

      "Could the Blackburn P.150 penetrate occupied Ukrainian airspace and strike critical infrastructure".

  • @freedomfalcon
    @freedomfalcon 2 роки тому

    I see that Matrix has earned his name dodging those missiles. And Sock gets one on the house.

  • @c.j.3404
    @c.j.3404 2 роки тому +4

    Shame you couldn’t also do the aim-152 as well, it had better range then the phenix but you could do three per pylon (so 18 missiles total). It was canceled because the super hornet didn’t have the radar range to make full use of the missile, gust on other resone the super hornet was a mistake (along with the fact it was 22 times as expecive to develop as the st-21).
    Also someone needs to get this mod to growling sidewinder I want to see him destroy a f-22 in this thing 😂.

  • @rmp5s
    @rmp5s 2 роки тому +1

    Grump and Sock refusing to be Chinese warms my heart.
    EDIT: Fantastic to hear you at your best again, Cap. 👍
    EDIT 2: This was one of the best ever. Just sayin'.

  • @droman608
    @droman608 2 роки тому +1

    I can only hope DCS will allow for modded planes like the Super Tomcat and the YF-23. #prototypes #airframevariants #acecombat

  • @9999plato
    @9999plato 2 роки тому +1

    The speed differential between these two aircraft mean that the Tomcat stands more of a chance to fire on the enemy carrier and also to fire and rearm and get back in the fight. You are not fighting the surface combatants and that could be all the difference in these engagements, also the local land bases play a big part.

  • @Oenomaus556
    @Oenomaus556 2 роки тому +2

    They should turn those old F-14s into fighter drones

  • @xenaguy01
    @xenaguy01 2 роки тому +1

    WOW!!! SUPER entertaining fight. Good flying, Grump, Sock, and Matrix!!!

  • @xpk0228
    @xpk0228 2 роки тому +8

    if its possible in game, the super tomcat should be able to carry 8 aim 120s and 2 aim 9s at the same time since this config was tested in the 90s. or you can give us a super phoenix mod where what if USN keep on improving the AIM54 to make it roughly go double the range (100 miles to 200 or more). they did double amraam range in 25 years, no reason they cant make phoenix go further if they want to.

  • @neilwilkins9002
    @neilwilkins9002 2 роки тому

    Why is was so excited while watching this last night i dont know... The F14 is as old as me and ive always loved it almost as much as the GR1...top vid. P.S. Grump dropping the english insults, just amazing.

  • @Govenator180
    @Govenator180 2 роки тому +2

    Cap you went above and beyond with this one. Super Tomcat is awesome and im pumped you did this!!

  • @Psychobolic77
    @Psychobolic77 2 роки тому +1

    Cheers for true carrier landing implementation. Glad to know you're listening to us

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      Roger still pretty buggy. Most of the RTB tomcats just crashed into the sea next to carrier :(

    • @Psychobolic77
      @Psychobolic77 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers Nevertheless, I appreciate the effort. Keep up the good work!

  • @kidskluth2981
    @kidskluth2981 2 роки тому +3

    Hi CAP could you please make a video on how to mod aim 120 ds on to aircraft

  • @5Andysalive
    @5Andysalive 2 роки тому +1

    worth remebering that the source for the open source data is not known for it's openness :)

  • @trevorday7923
    @trevorday7923 Рік тому

    The F-14 Tomcat is arguably THE most gorgeous fighter/interceptor ever made.
    That is all.

  • @fawakamaha
    @fawakamaha 2 роки тому +1

    had no idea someone put a super tomcat model in DCS. I wonder if someone has also added the F20.

  • @RTS907
    @RTS907 2 роки тому +2

    I really enjoyed Cap’s energy!

  • @zealman79
    @zealman79 2 роки тому +1

    Putting the fun into war. Who knew it could be done!

  • @theheavydutyamerican807
    @theheavydutyamerican807 2 роки тому +1

    Where will I be able to get the mods?

  • @strambino1
    @strambino1 2 роки тому +2

    You should do a battle between the Japanese Izumo carrier group and the Chinese Liaoning. The Japanese use destroyers that are modeled after the Arleigh Burke. The Izumo operates with the F35B.

  • @jacobchandler2083
    @jacobchandler2083 2 роки тому +1

    Lets see the st21 if they would’ve evolved the Phoenix along with it. Basically aim 120d and Phoenix love child missile

  • @MrDJAK777
    @MrDJAK777 2 роки тому +3

    Since you're getting comfortable modding any chance of testing out what a B1-R could have been capable of. Mach 2.2+ like the b1-a, AESA, air to air capable while still having it's normal load + more compatible with a variety of other conventional weapons the b1 traditionally isn't irrc.
    Edit would also be interesting if you could figure out a way to test the potential of a concept the US tested where they were putting RIM-174 SM-6 sans booster I believe onto f-18s

  • @AdamGunTech
    @AdamGunTech 2 роки тому +1

    should rerun with 90's missiles to see if the SuperCat would have dominated. Maybe put them up against the Super Hornets to see if the US NAvy made the right choice?

  • @troyweyerstrass7312
    @troyweyerstrass7312 2 роки тому +1

    Commentary is hilarious! 😂

  • @GlitchyGamers18
    @GlitchyGamers18 2 роки тому +3

    Hey gr to get the weapon pylons to come up you need to have at least one stock missile on the pylon. I’ve learnt this from putting AIM120D’s phoenixes and 9X’s on an f15

    • @MAYDAYSIMULATIONS
      @MAYDAYSIMULATIONS 2 роки тому

      So maybe a aim 9m on the inner pylon and put the 120d on the outer. Then Thadt additional animation that makes that lower portion should be normal? Maybe😄 great tip

    • @GlitchyGamers18
      @GlitchyGamers18 2 роки тому

      @@MAYDAYSIMULATIONS correct. Also if you put the file in it’s respective dcs saved games folder, it won’t break IC

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      Thanks!!!!

    • @GlitchyGamers18
      @GlitchyGamers18 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers no problem. Note the sometimes when you change the modded payload in the mission editor it might bug out but it should still work in-game. Also, when you release the missiles can you release the files for the modernised aircraft like the f15?

  • @MAYDAYSIMULATIONS
    @MAYDAYSIMULATIONS 2 роки тому +1

    Ha, you did it👍 The Tomcat that could have been! Pretty cool......Bridge to Crimea🤯 Your war games weren't too far off

  • @darrellseike3185
    @darrellseike3185 2 роки тому +1

    That was AWESOME Cap!!! Loved it!

  • @71Jay17
    @71Jay17 2 роки тому

    Haha good to see a balanced scenarios lads, the awacs is guiding the missile into itself via datalink followed by the epic dual engine loss carrier landing made for a great show guys, well done

  • @henrygibson9613
    @henrygibson9613 2 роки тому +2

    Fantastic video! Thanks CAP!

  • @carnifexor3010
    @carnifexor3010 2 роки тому +1

    Cap, Et al., great DCS video, and more comedic silliness please!

  • @jamesfletcher9032
    @jamesfletcher9032 2 роки тому +1

    the RTB function is really nice

  • @cassius_eu5970
    @cassius_eu5970 2 роки тому +6

    I know the missiles are not in service yet, but can you do a video like this with the PL-21 and AIM-260? The PL-21 is said to be a new development with a ramjet engine and a 300-400 km range.

    • @alvaromartin1185
      @alvaromartin1185 2 роки тому +1

      That’d be fun but the problem is that we have absolutely no idea what any of the specs are for the AIM260

    • @Dan-iv9tg
      @Dan-iv9tg 2 роки тому

      All that range is great, as long as you can track a target that far.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      Working on it but it's 90% just guess work.

    • @blademaster2390
      @blademaster2390 2 роки тому

      @@alvaromartin1185 AIM-260 would presumably be designed to have a similar range to the PL-21, if not more

    • @cassius_eu5970
      @cassius_eu5970 2 роки тому +1

      @@grimreapers Yeah I thought so, but it would be fun to see nevertheless even if it's going to be completely inaccurate. :D

  • @generallee011
    @generallee011 2 роки тому +1

    hey cap remember in top gun maverick. where he blocks a missle shot with the su-57 he guned just before

  • @custossecretus5737
    @custossecretus5737 2 роки тому +1

    I suppose that if the new tomcat was stealthy, it may of been in the running.
    I guess with todays warfare methods stealth is the way to go to do those deep precision strikes.
    We can see in other scenarios that murder load out airframes are easily taken out by enemy long range missiles, but the stealth planes can return and rearm. No loss of pilots either.

  • @freetruth9762
    @freetruth9762 2 роки тому +1

    Just started to watch I have to say out of love for a beautiful air frame I really wish for the Tomcats to win

  • @gendo1
    @gendo1 2 роки тому +1

    Simba wimba fan club checking in. Simba fastest pilot in GR.

  • @greybuckleton
    @greybuckleton 2 роки тому

    Really enjoyed that little Intel factoid, nice.

  • @timkirchoff3869
    @timkirchoff3869 2 роки тому

    Missed Opportunity for Cap to name his plane the Super TomCAP.

  • @MkD_SENS
    @MkD_SENS 2 роки тому +2

    Maybe a good video idea: what is there was a naval f22

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      That would be badass I must admit.

  • @nobodyimportant72
    @nobodyimportant72 2 роки тому +1

    One other thing about the Super Tomcat would have easier to maintain.

  • @welshdefenceforces
    @welshdefenceforces 2 роки тому +2

    AST21 with HARM’s ?

  • @darin447
    @darin447 Рік тому

    PilotPhotog has digital models of the ST-21 what’s the chance you can also update the skin your your DCS models using that or similar data?

  • @mattvs117
    @mattvs117 2 роки тому +1

    Just wondering if this mod is available? or just something Grim Reapers created and holding onto?

  • @danieljones7843
    @danieljones7843 2 роки тому +1

    If they were thinking of a 21st century version of the tomcat, I wonder if they were also thinking of a 21st century phoenix missiles… 200+ mile range phoenix anyone?

  • @therealdebater
    @therealdebater 2 роки тому +1

    PS: Does the PL-15 have datalink? Yes.

  • @user-A1A1
    @user-A1A1 2 роки тому +1

    future of warfare: most cost efficient high precision guided amunition will win wars. i accept paypal lol

  • @jimkluska253
    @jimkluska253 2 роки тому

    Awesome vid! Awesome commentary!

  • @user-A1A1
    @user-A1A1 2 роки тому +1

    do a budget batlle maybe. 0.003% of gdp in airfraimes maybe. could be an interestig modelling of sustainable "warpower"

  • @chrisconnolly4603
    @chrisconnolly4603 2 роки тому +1

    This will balance out The chinese launch in groups of four and the Americans launch in groups of......... 1
    GR logic to the extreme.

  • @53kenner
    @53kenner 2 роки тому

    It would be interesting to see how this stuff would work out if you could add ECM, such as Growler ... or even a Prowler.

  • @iristhompson2350
    @iristhompson2350 2 роки тому +1

    The Chinese type Three only has 3 cats, thus they should have slower launch rate.

  • @brianpreece4410
    @brianpreece4410 2 роки тому +2

    Great watch! Cap, is it possible to change the SM2 to replicate the SM6? The SM6 boasts extremely long ranges and can be data linked by aircraft to be guided to targets. These missiles are rather expensive and would likely only be spent on enemy aircraft and higher speed antiship cruise missiles. Allowing US ships to ward off enemy aircraft from 150 miles would change the battlespace greatly. Thanks, keep up the great work!

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      Working on it now but running into game problems.

  • @kai8853
    @kai8853 2 роки тому +2

    wow clicked on 30 seconds after the post nice.

  • @Chase-Man
    @Chase-Man 2 роки тому +2

    Yeah the AIM-54s after this resent update are really bad, armed the F-14 with 1x AIM-54A Mk.47 (due to the motor impulse changes and the burn time reduction on the Mk.60 motor, the Mk.47 motor is the best for long range shots) flew up to 44,000ft at mach 2, the new AIM-54s get to an abysmal 2,300kts at 68,000ft. That is only mach 4.0. Makes no sense seeing as mach 2 launch parameters should be definitely hitting the 4.3 mach that was spoken about in that congress meeting. I know the mach 5 number is heresay and 4.3 was the highest speed recorded but c'mon, mach 2.0 launch at 45,000ft only giving mach 4.0 is a little weird in my unprofessional opinion.

  • @THeBoZZHoGG
    @THeBoZZHoGG 2 роки тому +1

    how did you get the J-15 working the chinese aircraft mod doesnt work for me DCS crashes

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      We bodged the LUA to allow it to hook up.

  • @chrislash8493
    @chrislash8493 2 роки тому +1

    I actually enjoyed watching the navel battle after watching the air battle!! didn't care for navy videos by them selves but like it when mixed

  • @michaelmurray9232
    @michaelmurray9232 Рік тому

    Did all the tomcats blowing up on the side of the ship count? I don't know if they were able to respawn as AI or not. But I remember at the beginning those planes were bowling up when they got close to the Carrier. So just wondering again if that had any impact on the attrition rate?

  • @f14tomcat46
    @f14tomcat46 2 роки тому +1

    That not Super Tomcat ST21 that no have canard like F-18's canard?...That Tomcat EAVD( early advance Tomcat but the F-14D version? )

  • @Kevin-hb7yq
    @Kevin-hb7yq 2 роки тому +1

    Super Cool!
    The only fighter cooler looking than an F-14 was the F-4.

    • @Kevin-hb7yq
      @Kevin-hb7yq 2 роки тому

      Coolest would have been the Avro Arrow, but reasons.

  • @strambino1
    @strambino1 2 роки тому +4

    Awesome videos Super Cap! You’ve done so much to make these videos so realistic! I love the long range battles at sea because that’s more realistic. I don’t think you should change anything with your missiles. PL 15 has a max range of 85 miles and is close to the equivalent of AIM120D. The PL 21 and AIM 260 are roughly equivalent.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      Wiki: "Operational range 200-300 kilometres (120-190 mi)(PL-15)[4][1][2][5]"

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      I used the lower end of the scale.

    • @bussolini6307
      @bussolini6307 2 роки тому +1

      the PL-15E has 90 miles of range, but they are export version, countries like China and Russia with their R-77 usually downgrade the capabilities of their missiles for export.

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 2 роки тому +1

      Lol they're both (AIM-120D & PL-15) 100-120 miles! Lmao The AIM-260 JATM speed Mach 5 and has a range of 180 miles😆👍

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 2 роки тому +1

      Btw open source data used to say 200 miles for AIM-260 JATM! Lol just like The AIM-120D open source data used to say 120 miles lol they've both dropped and its really annoying and makes me wonder🤔

  • @IRONIC1688
    @IRONIC1688 2 роки тому +1

    Huuuurrrraaaa!!!!❤ I don't have to ask, you just read my mind.

  • @PvtPartzz
    @PvtPartzz 2 роки тому +1

    I’m really starting to like these overhead play by plays. I haven’t been watching this channel for long but your game commentating is getting better. That or I’m just appreciating these type of matches where real players are flying both sides. Either way, thanks for the content.
    **I will say however, that your scenarios and matchups would be far more interesting if you weren’t giving one side useful information on the other. For example, pointing out the bearing to Matrix on request, giving Matrix your advice about the range of his missiles when he’s low, and the general warnings to players about incoming missiles. Giving (primarily) one side information on their opponents is bad sportsmanship