NGAD 6th Generation vs Iranian SU-35 Flanker-E | Intercept | Digital Combat Simulator | DCS |

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 693

  • @GrowlingSidewinder
    @GrowlingSidewinder  Рік тому +109

    Check out the Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-spring.com/
    Longshot's Channel: ua-cam.com/channels/szke4C7G1THhlh0puHWZ1g.html
    please avoid the urge to point out to me that this is actually the ADFX-01 from AC, I'm aware of that lol, it's just a cool concept I wanted to explore for fun mostly of what it COULD possibly be like to fight a 6th generation fighter. Anyway Thanks for watching and I'll see you in the next one.

    • @paolo5140
      @paolo5140 Рік тому

      hey GS can you make eurofighter CAS video please

    • @penguifyer9919
      @penguifyer9919 Рік тому +2

      Dude, I love this. Seeing the ADFX-01 in a high fidelity simulator and fighting realistically is amazing.

    • @thedishonoredamerican129
      @thedishonoredamerican129 Рік тому

      Two morons vs NGAD video would be epic I think 😏

    • @ditzydoo4378
      @ditzydoo4378 Рік тому +2

      NGAD, a rewarmed YF-19 from Macross. Question: Will it transform into Gerwalk and Battloid mode configurations this time? ^~^ would be sooooo epic if it did. >~

    • @leapdrive
      @leapdrive Рік тому

      NGAD was way up at 100k ft.,snuck behind him from above, launched a missile while growling sidewinder kept saying “he didn’t know where he was.” His plane broke up in two making two fireballs while the third fireball was the pilot, all lighting up the twilight sky.

  • @swordmonkey6635
    @swordmonkey6635 Рік тому +1964

    Growler: "I'm scanning high and low and I can't find the NGAD."
    NGAD: **hiding behind Jupiter**

    • @TheRobeRanger
      @TheRobeRanger Рік тому +120

      Exactly, who is to say that the NGAD doesn't have rocket engines and lightspeed missiles...

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  Рік тому +231

      Looooooool great comment

    • @samuelpettington2241
      @samuelpettington2241 Рік тому +17

      I like the fact that it's hiding behind Jupiter, despite the fact that it is so much more advanced hahaha

    • @swordmonkey6635
      @swordmonkey6635 Рік тому +53

      @@samuelpettington2241 NGAD is going to "slingshot" its missiles using Jupiter's gravity well so prepare for not hypersonic missiles, but fractional sub-luminal speeds. lol

    • @Sin526
      @Sin526 Рік тому +11

      @@TheRobeRanger "warp engines and photon torpedoes"
      Ftfy

  • @rogerhinman5427
    @rogerhinman5427 Рік тому +1471

    That wasn't an air-to-air missile. That was a baby ICBM.

    • @wolfofnyx
      @wolfofnyx Рік тому +107

      I love the Morgan's MPBMs (Multi Purpose Burst Missiles for those that do not know)

    • @gripen777
      @gripen777 Рік тому +79

      nuclear deterrence that you can fit into your pocket!

    • @rogerhinman5427
      @rogerhinman5427 Рік тому +9

      @@gripen777 LOL!

    • @viasulagro
      @viasulagro Рік тому +2

      Really

    • @sbg911
      @sbg911 Рік тому +36

      Clearly they have worked out how to weaponize wheat silo's...

  • @KalvyNoodle
    @KalvyNoodle Рік тому +740

    "I'm gonna assume we're safe"
    I expected an immediate impact

  • @TictacAddict1
    @TictacAddict1 Рік тому +429

    NGAD came out of warp late, ended up being behind you. Fortunately he was able to send his missile through the worm hole it created to hit you. Actually that was not a missile but, an aerodynamic short bus of the future.

  • @itsaflyboything
    @itsaflyboything Рік тому +258

    CFA 44 could fill in as the FCAS. ADMM vs MPWM in DCS would be something else to watch

    • @Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10
      @Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10 Рік тому +30

      ADMM and railguns in DCS would be crazy

    • @StrelitziaLiveries
      @StrelitziaLiveries Рік тому +14

      @@Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10 i think the x02s' railgun would be better since it was gimballed and allowed to be computer aimed to a certain degree

    • @awesomefatBruceLee
      @awesomefatBruceLee Рік тому +8

      TLS and pulse lasers might be "slightly" overpowered in DCS

    • @danny_boi3537
      @danny_boi3537 Рік тому +3

      this is acronym, not english lol

  • @WardogDCS
    @WardogDCS Рік тому +109

    **FLAMENCO INTENSIFIES**

  • @majster3986
    @majster3986 Рік тому +297

    You should do a F-15C vs the ADFX-01 (the "'NGAD"). with appropriate liveries of course ;)

  • @17missing
    @17missing Рік тому +288

    I was hoping there would be a TacView at the end to see how fast that NGAD got to 100000 feet. But sadly no

    • @Hydra_6544
      @Hydra_6544 Рік тому +4

      Same

    • @puppergump4117
      @puppergump4117 Рік тому +3

      A few seconds maybe

    • @leeh9420
      @leeh9420 Рік тому +25

      Even TacView can't find the NGAD

    • @joshdavoust5062
      @joshdavoust5062 Рік тому +3

      I’d love to see a TacView with the NGAD, both with the F-22 and SU-35 to showcase its capability in both fights. Granted, we know next to dirt about the NGAD right now, but while we’re speculating it would be fun to watch

    • @christopherfox7650
      @christopherfox7650 Рік тому +3

      That thing whent up to 90,000 feet like it wasn't even trying to bet it could intercept a sr71 blackbird

  • @Draganzer_
    @Draganzer_ Рік тому +276

    I was expecting a much larger radius from the MPBM but the fact that its even modeled in the first place makes me happy, *_TLS in DCS pls_*

  • @AzureanSky
    @AzureanSky Рік тому +141

    Considering how Tactical Laser Systems are being developed and the ADFX-01 is capable of carrying a TLS pod, I wouldn't be surprised about your plane disintegrating while flying let alone dying from a burst missile.

    • @ryanc00p3r3
      @ryanc00p3r3 Рік тому +34

      R.I.P PJ
      Never buy a flower to your girlfriend if your a fighter pilot...

  • @challenger2205
    @challenger2205 Рік тому +189

    Every time I see the MPBM's effect, I get stunned by such a radical concept of a weapon, and then I get stunned even more realizing the US airforce used to have a missile called AIM-26a Nuclear Falcon.

    • @brianwright9514
      @brianwright9514 Рік тому +15

      Well, until Canada found out about it and was like, "what now?"

    • @martindinner3621
      @martindinner3621 Рік тому +5

      A.K.A. The Genie.

    • @avi8aviate
      @avi8aviate Рік тому +3

      @@martindinner3621 No, that one's the AIR-2.

    • @charlesfollette9692
      @charlesfollette9692 Рік тому +4

      The 60’s was a wild time….

    • @jameson1239
      @jameson1239 Рік тому +3

      @@brianwright9514 canada used the unguided version the genie

  • @Fredfredbug4
    @Fredfredbug4 Рік тому +101

    Protip: You have to fight the ngad head on. The air intakes are the only way a missile can touch it.

  • @theteddybear4077
    @theteddybear4077 Рік тому +88

    I actually had a laugh when it cut to the NGAD role playing as a space shuttle

    • @Etyneo1984
      @Etyneo1984 Рік тому +9

      Why yes, the NGAD identifies as a spacecraft. :P

  • @Ilyak1986
    @Ilyak1986 Рік тому +61

    I do wonder what the NGAD will ultimately look like. Sandboxx thinks it's going to be some super high-altitude flying wing thing, but max speed is still below Mach 3, and the turning abilities might actually be inferior to the F-22 since it's designed for pure stealth, altitude, and ordnance, as opposed to any sort of dogfighting. Basically, get *super* high, and just look down shoot down and blow up anything that flies.
    Most likely won't look like the ADFX-01, but...that would be neat O_o

    • @possumfoot1985
      @possumfoot1985 Рік тому +5

      I doubt either ngad program will be a single aircraft. I have a sneaking suspicion that sr-72 will be incorporated into the program. One of the biggest aspects will likely be advanced sensor fusion.

    • @avi8aviate
      @avi8aviate Рік тому +4

      I think it might turn out like the X-44 MANTA, an X-plane based on the F-22 but with no control surfaces at all, instead relying on thrust vector control to maneuver.

  • @souryuu_496
    @souryuu_496 Рік тому +69

    If they had used the Wyvern for the NGAD the speed would actually be somewhat believable but there is no way in hell he is reaching that speed with forward swept wings

    • @lemieux-z8933
      @lemieux-z8933 Рік тому +55

      It's ok tho US burrowed some Belkan technology!

    • @aeruxo138
      @aeruxo138 Рік тому +28

      belkans made the plane it’s gonna disobey the laws of physics

    • @droman608
      @droman608 9 місяців тому +1

      Laughs in *scramjet* 🦅

    • @kendallbedford2523
      @kendallbedford2523 2 місяці тому

      Wouldn't it be cool if the wings could reverse

  • @luckyno888
    @luckyno888 Рік тому +56

    With NGAD being so expensive wars will be determined by 1 vs 1 engagements between countries.

    • @MagicalPorkChop
      @MagicalPorkChop Рік тому +13

      The step beyond that was a ST:TOS episode where engagements are simulated but the casualties are real. 😲

    • @davegrenier1160
      @davegrenier1160 Рік тому +2

      Stealth could become so effective that BVR fights may not be possible. The Mark I Eyeball may be the only sensor capable of detecting and tracking such an aircraft, and air-to-air combat may revert to guns only, because missiles might be rendered useless at all ranges.

    • @MobiusThreeMusic
      @MobiusThreeMusic Рік тому +8

      @@davegrenier1160 Ah yes, the minovsky particles

    • @OrtadragoonX
      @OrtadragoonX Рік тому

      @@MobiusThreeMusic
      Yes another UC Gundam fan!
      Zieg Zeon Comrade.

    • @moustrout1299
      @moustrout1299 Рік тому

      @@davegrenier1160 Following your prediction as the basis of my argument,
      I think missiles(particularly close range missiles)
      even then would still be useful, say, an extremely advanced optical sensor, on a missile so advanced that it can do a 90 off the rail

  • @Enkarashaddam
    @Enkarashaddam Рік тому +29

    "I don't even know where to look to be honest..."
    NGAD TRAVELLING 100,000 KM/H IN HIGH EARTH ORBIT

  • @GM-fh5jp
    @GM-fh5jp Рік тому +29

    Damn, that last missile looked big enough to include a boarding party. (0-0)

  • @majorpark
    @majorpark Рік тому +46

    This is what V2 is for

  • @numberyellow
    @numberyellow Рік тому +19

    OK, so we saw ADFX-01 vs F-22 dogfight.... What we NEED to see is ADFX-01 vs F-15 ACTIVE dogfight. I think that would be insane.

    • @cineva-wb1pk
      @cineva-wb1pk Рік тому +2

      How about the adf-11 or even the cfa-44?

  • @plaguedocx
    @plaguedocx Рік тому +27

    7:00 "So, have you found a reason to fight yet?"

  • @kindasupersonic7114
    @kindasupersonic7114 Рік тому +33

    The NGAD reminds me so much of MACROSS.. its such a cool think to look at.

    • @SVSky
      @SVSky Рік тому +10

      Shinsei Industries YF-19 =)

  • @andrewrogers3067
    @andrewrogers3067 Рік тому +126

    Two videos in one day with the NGAD?!
    Dude, I love you, no homo. I pray we see more with this plane, possibly in BVR.

  • @Superiocrates
    @Superiocrates Рік тому +36

    A sukhoi 47 dogfight would be really cool to see! maybe like an f-16 vs Su47 or something, anyway great vid cant wait to see more!

    • @winterketplay2017
      @winterketplay2017 Рік тому +5

      Alas for dcs there is no Su47mod yet

    • @Superiocrates
      @Superiocrates Рік тому +5

      @@winterketplay2017 ah rip, oh well we can sure hope one comes out soon!

    • @wurfyy
      @wurfyy Рік тому +3

      @@winterketplay2017 Also I'm pretty sure the Su-47 never carried weapons.

    • @lemieux-z8933
      @lemieux-z8933 Рік тому +1

      @@wurfyy in this timeline it doesn't

  • @mfish9374
    @mfish9374 Рік тому +9

    I like there was not even a round 2. I can just imagine the joy in Longshots cockpit.

  • @jurestormchaser5382
    @jurestormchaser5382 Рік тому +38

    That NGAD looks like it's straight out of Robotech :D love it :D

    • @pheelix-
      @pheelix- Рік тому +8

      I am waiting for it to transform its engines and start walking.

  • @thexlonewolf671
    @thexlonewolf671 Рік тому +25

    Bruh, imagine if that had been the PW.MK1 from Project Wingman. This fight would've been even more unfair.

    • @dsdy1205
      @dsdy1205 Рік тому +5

      Fox 3 times 10000

    • @hresvelgr7193
      @hresvelgr7193 Рік тому +15

      @@dsdy1205 When you hear the BRRRRT and then realise it wasn't a gun it was a lot of missiles

    • @lemieux-z8933
      @lemieux-z8933 Рік тому +7

      **

    • @null5909
      @null5909 Рік тому

      @@lemieux-z8933 **

    • @theguylivinginyourwalls
      @theguylivinginyourwalls Рік тому +1

      "Woah, what are those blue orbs?"
      *bullet hell begins*

  • @FukaiRei27
    @FukaiRei27 Рік тому +15

    As AC player this makes me giggle all the time

  • @FlightSimHistorian
    @FlightSimHistorian Рік тому +8

    "I'm going to assume we're safe"...... Famous last words.....

  • @acftmxman
    @acftmxman Рік тому +17

    GS, loved the video. In truth, that is what a 6 Gen v. 4 Gen should look like because the Su-35 is an upgraded 4 Gen. The US has admitted that they had tac nukes the size of a briefcase. But because you can’t control the fallout, it is too dangerous to use them practically. The things you are seeing the NGAD do is actually old technology that has finally been updated. Skunkworks never sleeps.

  • @air-headedaviator1805
    @air-headedaviator1805 Рік тому +71

    With how good the NGAD is at BVR I wonder if Mig-25/31’s would be better matches against it

    • @danrazART
      @danrazART Рік тому

      Yes. Exactly. Put them fox bats and hounds to work!

    • @SkeetSystem
      @SkeetSystem Рік тому +11

      On paper it's a better match up but if the R40 can't get a lock...

    • @maliburallye350
      @maliburallye350 Рік тому +3

      Nothing to do the prehistoric red clunkers with a 6 generation fighter!🙄

    • @allenjay896
      @allenjay896 Рік тому

      I doubt the 25 would be enough. But i think the 31 will be… no gurantee that it will win against it but i think its enough to pose a challenge

    • @maliburallye350
      @maliburallye350 Рік тому

      @@allenjay896 , pure red clunkers!

  • @terrywest111
    @terrywest111 Рік тому +9

    Whoa! The last few seconds were awesome! You saw it coming and couldn't do a thing about it.
    Just like: "I need to defend... I don't even have him on radar..." *disintegrates*

    • @swedhgemoni8092
      @swedhgemoni8092 Рік тому

      Both of them died? I just skimmed through the video.

  • @nj1255
    @nj1255 Рік тому +6

    "NGAD cruising at 90000 feet Mach 5". Don't know why, but I laughed so hard at this 😂

  • @thebudgieadmiral5140
    @thebudgieadmiral5140 Рік тому +13

    While cool, i am a little doubtful of the speed and altitude regimes. Remember that there was an interceptor version of the SR-71, named YF-12, which carried I believe Phoenix missiles. They encountered severe issues launching these weapons at such high speeds.

    • @avi8aviate
      @avi8aviate Рік тому

      Not quite Phoenix missiles, but AIM-47 Falcons. In DCS though, I think it has Phoenixes.

  • @gilraine1225
    @gilraine1225 Рік тому +19

    I've heard the NGAD will possibly have directed energy weapons in development as well as missiles

    • @hazardpay8560
      @hazardpay8560 Рік тому

      was literally just about to comment with this..
      It's possible (and a little sad to consider) that the NGAD will be nothing but a high mach Delta wing with a D.E. turret on the belly, to be employed offensively AND defensively...
      SAMS? ZZZZAP
      AAMS? ZZZZAP
      Planes? ZZZZAP
      Helos? ZZZZAP
      Won't be much use versus Tanks/Ships/Buildings - 1st gen D.E. likely won't have the joules on tap to do any real damage to these hard targets.
      But flying things are fragile and filled with delicate sensors....
      But do a few sweeps with a flight of these to clear out air defenses in a zone, then send in the conventional attack aircraft to handle business.
      This turret design effectively negates the need for dogfighting :/
      End of an era?

    • @piscessoedroen
      @piscessoedroen Рік тому +3

      i also heard that it will have intercontinental ballistic missile control integrated into the cockpit in case of emergency launch is needed

    • @kendallbedford2523
      @kendallbedford2523 2 місяці тому

      It will

  • @thatoneleftist
    @thatoneleftist Рік тому +12

    Considering the altitude, do attacks from the NGAD count as a fighter engagement or orbital bombardment? 😁

  • @carebearsboy1390
    @carebearsboy1390 Рік тому +1

    7:05 - That missile sounded so sick coming off the rail *BEEP* - You know when your missile beeps it's some next level $hi7!

  • @anthonyf3647
    @anthonyf3647 Рік тому +5

    "Those who survive a long time on the battlefield start to think they're invincible. I bet you do, too, Buddy."

  • @GlitchyGamers18
    @GlitchyGamers18 Рік тому +12

    The f22 has finally been replaced in its role as, the fighter that is always offensive even if it looks defensive

    • @meintingles4396
      @meintingles4396 Рік тому

      @@googleplex1589 90,000 FT at Mach 5 is ridiculous, yes. But the NGAD will cost anywhere from 200-300 MILLION per unit. So don't let the price render it as fictional.

  • @jimmy8x541
    @jimmy8x541 Рік тому +12

    clouds in DCS 2.8 look so damn good..

  • @rafaledude
    @rafaledude Рік тому +10

    I didn't expect the small nuke at the end lol

  • @drkvenger
    @drkvenger Рік тому +7

    I think I’ve seen the NGAD before. It was created by Japan’s UN SPACY corp. known as the YF19. MACROSS PLUS.

  • @Verminator4
    @Verminator4 Рік тому +11

    Those who survive a long time on the battlefield start to think they're invincible. I bet you do too, buddy.

  • @thekingofspoons1027
    @thekingofspoons1027 Рік тому +5

    Truly - THIS is what V2 is for.

  • @zerod3618
    @zerod3618 Рік тому +6

    "Yo buddy, you still alive?"

  • @solowingborders3239
    @solowingborders3239 Рік тому +4

    Side note: that ADFX-01/02 is a 4.5 fighter, I feel like the XFA-36 or XFA-33 would be a better stand-in for the NGAD.

    • @solowingborders3239
      @solowingborders3239 Рік тому +1

      Yeah I know how it works, I figure the Fenrir without it's LSWM or microwave weapons is still a good stand-in for the upper estimate of the NGAD. The COFFIN system is basically a further development of the DAS in the F-35 in terms of situational awareness.

  • @Jayjet777
    @Jayjet777 Рік тому +3

    Demon lord of the Round Table, I pray for your success.

  • @heinyhxc
    @heinyhxc Рік тому +6

    i see the Americans hired some Belkans for their aircraft design

  • @nathaniellazo5912
    @nathaniellazo5912 Рік тому +10

    More NGAD simulations, let's go!!

  • @slabulous4876
    @slabulous4876 Рік тому +1

    Just a little observation, but interestingly if it is purely an air dominance stealth fighter meant to take over the job of the F-22, the NGAD likely wouldn't perform such absurdly high speeds as Mach 5, if anything it would probably fly a similar speed to the F-22. In the earlier days, jets were made faster with the interceptor role in mind before missile technology was as sophisticated as it is now; now missiles make up the difference for the lack of speed in modern fighter jets. At that same token, slower speeds favor maneuverability and at a lower cost of production than a jet with a powerful enough engine to reach really high speeds. So in the modern age, it just isn't necessary anymore, but the military could always have a new idea on how to capitalize on the enemy that we've never heard of before, and that could involve an extremely high-speed fighter jet, as long as you can get enough pilots willing to learn how to comfortably fly at Mach 5 haha.

  • @spacekraken666
    @spacekraken666 Рік тому +2

    ADFX-01 vs F-15C guns only in a winter storm mountains next!

  • @mrbrisket1261
    @mrbrisket1261 Рік тому +2

    Damn I thought Halloween was over, that missile at the end is the stuff of nightmares.

  • @JohnHill-qo3hb
    @JohnHill-qo3hb Рік тому +2

    Way back when the F-101 was the leading edge fighter/interceptor, it carried two AIR-2A rockets, unguided, with a small nuclear warhead. The idea was to launch the rocket towards the hoards of enemy bombers, when the rocket had reached a predetermined flight time, it would go "KER-FRICKIN-BOOM", the shock wave was envisioned to literally rip the bombers apart.

    • @martindinner3621
      @martindinner3621 Рік тому

      Check out the nuclear version of the Falcon AAM.

    • @JohnHill-qo3hb
      @JohnHill-qo3hb Рік тому +1

      @@martindinner3621 The AIM-4D? I used to work on the F-101B er, sorry, the CF-101B, 409 Sqn, CFB Comox, BC.

  • @EndlessInfinity1
    @EndlessInfinity1 Рік тому +2

    The madmen. They actually did it.
    I do kinda wish they did the x-02 wyvern though.

  • @King_Dusty_Of_Pookytopia
    @King_Dusty_Of_Pookytopia Рік тому +8

    They're planning to put 2 F-35 engines in the NGAD so hypersonic performance is completely out of the question.
    However there is a small company that is currently testing combining traditional turbine engines with a ramjet section in the back.
    Hopefully that works out.

    • @CarTM
      @CarTM Рік тому +1

      No hypersonic NGAD 😭

  • @jexmatex
    @jexmatex Рік тому +1

    Despite the quality of your videos and quality of your voice tone and explanation, another thing is the visual quality of the sceneries you choose, i'd love and i think i speak for many people here that wed love you to share the mission file with your settings of clouds time of the day, time of the year, even with no specifique airplanes :)

  • @BrianTRice77
    @BrianTRice77 Рік тому +1

    This is just like the wild fantasies we had in the 1980’s of the Firefox and the F-19 stealth fighter, just making up high Mach numbers with unhinged combat capabilities and control systems.
    NGAD is a project in our world with our materials. Maybe hugely expensive materials, but any capabilities it has that the F-22 doesn’t will come at the expense of acquisition and operating costs, and reduced operational availability and readiness. The F-22 itself and F-35 already have poor availability and operating expenses.

  • @DChrls
    @DChrls Рік тому +1

    That missile hit GS so hard he didn't even comment afterwards. 😲

  • @switch209gaming
    @switch209gaming Рік тому +3

    The NGAD looks like it has a thigh gap, as if making the Secretary Bird into an actual jet.

    • @kenhagler7166
      @kenhagler7166 Рік тому

      That's where the arms would go on the VF-19, but since the NGAD doesn't transform it doesn't need them. 🙂

  • @jaidenheger20005
    @jaidenheger20005 Рік тому +16

    for anyone who wants to know, the NGAD was flying at 30,000m or 30km high. this is very interesting, and to go off of what i was saying earlier, i made a mistake of X-wing aircraft, because its hypersonic at high altitudes the X-wing configuration means nothing with low air drag so technically its hypersonic, super/hyper-manoeuvrable, stealth behemoth.

    • @rafaelgomez1200
      @rafaelgomez1200 Рік тому +1

      Not really stealthy by design

    • @JesusFriedChrist
      @JesusFriedChrist Рік тому +1

      If you can basically outrun hypersonic missiles there’s no need for stealth.

    • @jaidenheger20005
      @jaidenheger20005 Рік тому +1

      @@JesusFriedChrist fair

    • @jaidenheger20005
      @jaidenheger20005 Рік тому

      @@Scheiseposter k, again i dont know anything about modern aircraft

    • @jaidenheger20005
      @jaidenheger20005 Рік тому

      @@Scheiseposter indeed, also dark colour scheme helps too ig

  • @NhatHuy8204
    @NhatHuy8204 Рік тому +1

    "So... have you found a reason to fight yet?"
    *"buddy"*

  • @stephenroach8033
    @stephenroach8033 Рік тому +1

    Talk is those mirror coatings spotted on Fat Amy and F22s is for IRST threats. I'm sure it would be on the 6th Gen as well. I'd love to see the X-29 and / or the X-31 in combat.

  • @joshuaharlow4241
    @joshuaharlow4241 Рік тому +1

    Gotta love it when the 'dis-respect' turn radius is measured in NM. 😁

  • @usptact
    @usptact Рік тому +1

    "I'm assuming I'm safe"
    Those fateful words and I knew the trouble is imminent.

  • @C4T4N4
    @C4T4N4 Рік тому +7

    X 02 is better concept for a ngad
    It can have huge missiles inside his belly

    • @Mobius118
      @Mobius118 Рік тому +3

      X-02 Wyvern really would be though… that thing is something else. most fearsome jet I’ve fed outside of the XFA-33 Fenrir

  • @SavageCips
    @SavageCips Рік тому +2

    Didn’t even finish what you were trying to say lol 😂

  • @allanchen8496
    @allanchen8496 Рік тому +4

    Growling - can we see a match up between as many NK era jets vs the 80 F35s or equivalent 5th gen fighter that South Korea in response scrambled?
    Would love to see how this would actually play out.

  • @drebin4575
    @drebin4575 Рік тому +2

    Me: "Watching GS trying to defend himself from a baby whale missile"
    NGAD Pilot: "Put on 3D glasses and eat popcorn while watching GS trying to defend himself"
    Man that kill was funny 🤣

  • @stevebailey7633
    @stevebailey7633 Рік тому +3

    I doubt we will see Mach 5 in this aircraft. Physics doesn't change and they would have the same issues with heat on the exterior as well as heat interior to deal with as they did with SR 71 and XB-70 and it might be beyond the budget to have that capability included. Super cruise, yes, thats as much a factor of the engines, but beyond Mach 2 they fight heat as well as becoming a major IR image.

  • @eppy8454
    @eppy8454 Рік тому

    That is wicked scary stuff! I’m reminded of a funny saying in the first Top Gun in the locker room. “He said where’d he go. I said where’d whooooooi goooooo?”

  • @2ndtonone1000
    @2ndtonone1000 Рік тому +1

    That missile he fired was a multi purpose burst missile, or MPBM for short.

  • @heykat18
    @heykat18 Рік тому +1

    That missile hit you so hard you didn't want 2nd's. LOL

  • @alxavier3795
    @alxavier3795 9 місяців тому

    Holy cow!
    That was one of the scariest engagements I’ve ever watched!!

  • @M4xPower
    @M4xPower Рік тому +2

    The Canadian military had nuclear air to air rockets from the 60s until the 80s. The CF-101 Voodoo could carry them.

  • @yaseen157
    @yaseen157 Рік тому +1

    Sixth generation is likely going to be distributed propulsion, with a huge focus on turboelectrics and sensor suites out the wazoo in my opinion

  • @derliebej7675
    @derliebej7675 Рік тому +2

    Hey GS, an idea for a new combat format: instead of doing bandit unknown, do a loadout unknown. You and the bandit each have a total of 4 fox3s and 6 fox2s for 5 rounds. Neither of you knows, what the other guy brings to battle. Should be a lot of fun.

  • @brokko_le3
    @brokko_le3 Рік тому +1

    I was already wondering what kind of massive apollo missiles that thing was carrying until 7:00. Yeah, ouch 😅

  • @Antonio.1225
    @Antonio.1225 Рік тому +3

    would love to see some NGAD pov rounds from you 👀

  • @Thunderbox247
    @Thunderbox247 Рік тому +1

    5:46 could say high to Jeff Bezos up there in his "Space Tourism"

  • @slipstorm798
    @slipstorm798 Рік тому +1

    I really love this constant stream of videos recently, it makes me wonder though, how many videos do you make in a day? Preciate the content just dont want you getting burnt out (though you have been playing this for years LMAO)

  • @OswaldM_14
    @OswaldM_14 Рік тому +1

    An F-22, Su-57, and J-20 teaming up to take out the NGAD would be cool

  • @Yokochan84
    @Yokochan84 Рік тому +3

    If it’s possible you should try fighting against the Super Sylph from the Yukikaze series!

  • @geonerd
    @geonerd Рік тому

    7:08 - "Hold still while I launch a moon rocket at you!" :)

  • @LongBinh70
    @LongBinh70 Рік тому

    Air burst not a new concept, as you said. As a kid in the late '50s and '60s, we knew of several Nike air defense bases around our State (CT). When I was stationed on the New Jersey shore in 1968 (Army) we would go to the beach in Sandy Hook, not realizing that the concrete bunkers we were sunning ourselves next to contained the Nike Hercules, the nuclear version of the ground-to-air missile!
    The idea was to detonate the nuclear warhead in the midst of a Soviet bomber flight over the Atlantic and take out most of the flight.

  • @LoScorpioneRosso1
    @LoScorpioneRosso1 Рік тому +1

    Now there should be a 1 VS 2 with this against an F-16C and an F-15C !

  • @irunoncaffeine2083
    @irunoncaffeine2083 Рік тому +2

    This doesn't seem quite right for the NGAD, isn't it supposed to be stealth? I didn't think external weapon stores were very stealthy yknow?

  • @CNCTEMATIC
    @CNCTEMATIC Рік тому

    Watching this NGAD concept reminds me of a model "Stealth Fighter" I got when I was a kid, before the F-117 had been shown publicly. The model looked like a shrunk down version of the Blackbird, very unlike the actual thing. I suspect this concept will be similarly "accurate" - I'd bet there will be no fwd swept wings. Extremely cool to watch tho

  • @sulyokpeter3941
    @sulyokpeter3941 Рік тому +1

    The 6th gen aircraft will have a defensive system vs missiles. At least thats what I read about them. 6th gen fighter jets will capable of defeating incoming missiles with some kind of kinetic energy. Is that true? I have no idea. On the internet you can read everything basically, but that would be interesting. What kind of defense 6th gen aircraft will have to defeat incoming missiles and also track enemy missiles. Very very interesting. Nice video BTW. This gives us an idea what it could look like vs tth gen fighters. :D Interesting stuff.

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 Рік тому

      Either a DEW or a self defense missile. Both have been tested in the past.

  • @xii-nyth4101
    @xii-nyth4101 5 місяців тому

    the afterburner ("lack of ir stealth") on that looks like the effect from winguts 2 where they would just stretch across your screen at high speed lol

  • @H1Guard
    @H1Guard Рік тому +1

    Mmmmm, no. That "NGAD" could never be stealthy with those huge intakes, long jet nozzle protruding behind, etc.
    It does look cool.

  • @thatbeetus1912
    @thatbeetus1912 Рік тому +2

    Had to listen to some Magic Spear while watching this.

  • @battlebirdbricks8892
    @battlebirdbricks8892 Рік тому

    That hit was so brutal! This video was awesome!

  • @rtbarker
    @rtbarker Рік тому

    Thanks for the double dip!

  • @jamesp8164
    @jamesp8164 Рік тому +1

    This is legit almost like “fighter jet vs UFO”.

  • @TheGamingLeopard95
    @TheGamingLeopard95 Рік тому

    Bruhhh the sound the missile makes before impact is mad scary with headphones 😂

  • @peterreily1490
    @peterreily1490 Рік тому +1

    The one time I want a tac brief. Snippity dippity dangly dingly doo.
    If a rapper steals that name, I’ll laugh at them too.

  • @chrischammas1
    @chrischammas1 Рік тому

    Was hoping they would build the NGAD off of some of the concept designs coming out of the Lockmart, Boeing etc… looks like they just decided to model a random sci-fi flankeresque fighter. Still super cool…

  • @maeviu-twich6280
    @maeviu-twich6280 Рік тому

    NGAD pilot: "So, have you found a reason to fight yet... Buddy"

  • @alexhndr
    @alexhndr Рік тому +1

    Pseudo-Real-Life CFA-44 would be the best thing for DCS
    *I want that ADMM spam*