It appears that you have an incorrect equation for the end correction. UNSW's website states: "For a simple cylindrical pipe... experiments and calculations show that the end effect (or end correction) at the open end is equivalent to increasing the pipe by a length of about 0.6 times the radius" Which is equivalent to 0.3 times the diameter. newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/flutes.v.clarinets.html
Practical examples are always the best way to explain things. Brilliant, well done.
Standing waves. A part of fundamental physics. I love it.
Best explanation I've heard on this topic, thank you!
By the way, in the case of n, at 7:44, it ruffly might be compared to the plank’s constant relating to em-waves. Don’t judge too hard, I said ruffly.
Good teaching, watching from Pakistan
It appears that you have an incorrect equation for the end correction. UNSW's website states: "For a simple cylindrical pipe... experiments and calculations show that the end effect (or end correction) at the open end is equivalent to increasing the pipe by a length of about 0.6 times the radius" Which is equivalent to 0.3 times the diameter.
newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/flutes.v.clarinets.html
Thanks for the correction. My error.