if you ask the real aeronautical engineering they all will say it impossible to copy modern aircraft because it was make from hundreds of thousand part with specific technique to make
@@JohnnyG-b7j But dude, it's true. I was in the USAF doing flight line maintenance. You can't just copy a part - the philosophy of how parts integrate and wear over time is dependent upon the designer's predicted maintenance schedules. Think of Honda - they are well known to be forgiving with maintenance and will last forever - meanwhile an old Ford can keep running especially if you keep up with maintenance. Honda is thoughtful that their consumers may not do as much maintenance as Ford will do. The American military is obsessive about maintenance, it's why we have aircraft built in the 1950's still doing operations today. How often will China strip their J35 to the frame and xray it for microscopic failures? The USAF is doing this every 10 years. A very small thing like replacing O-rings on a regular basis can make the difference between combat ready and a "hanger queen" - and if one military anticipates changing that O-ring twice a year, another military replaces it only once every 5 years, it's a huge difference in failure rate.
@@horridohobbies It's because the F135 engine on the F-35 is that powerful. Even 2 x WS-21 can't match the thrust performance of a single F135. And this is b4 the Block IV upgrades for F135 engine. Maybe if they give J-35 2 x WS-15 would it match if not exceed a single F135 engine.
I love how this video condescend the J20. "it's a copy of refale mixed with F22" that's almost to say a pagani zonda is a mix of Lamborghini and a Ferrari.
What? That entire sentence was much more complimentary of the J20 than the J35, he calls it "a unique design taking characteristics from the rafale and the F22" and then goes on to call the J35 much less innovative and pretty much a copy If you just want to be mad at the comparisons sure, but to say that sentence condescends the J20 is exactly the opposite of what its tone was lol
meh, i get that, one super engine versus two Chinese bottle-rockets looks--- better? lol, no, really, the F-22 is nice, nothing compared to the YF-23, but the F-35 looks a bit like a little Nome (spelling?), but what is being loaded in it and upgrading... it's a little beast, and ~inexpensive~ finally. The fleet Isreal ticked Iran with were drop-dead invisible. They had no chance, and less now because Isreal reduced Irans radars and sams. The best is that the F-117 is still around and still the smallest return of any aircraft, including the F-22/
@@viciousstarfish Why can J35 achieve a super cruise of 1.5 Mach and a maximum flight speed of 2.2 Mach. The maximum flight speed of F35 is only 1.6 Mach, and it cannot achieve supersonic cruising. Additionally, dual engines in naval fighter jets are always safer than conventional engines. This is the experience that Americans have summed up with their blood. Now unscrupulous enterprises have killed the contribution of naval pilots for the sake of interests.
If the Chinese took the data files from Lockheed, unless we took their designs, then it means they have the advantage (they know what we are using but we don't know what they have). There are a lot of actual fighter pilots on UA-cam talking about the F35, you'll realize it's not at all bells & roses. About 50% of the entire F35 fleet is grounded due to excessive failures and needed repairs according to US congress. Add to that, the F35 is called "Fat Amy" for a reason, as it's actually a downgrade in performance in many areas compared to the twin engine jets it's suppose to replace. For example, the engine can't be run at full Military Power for more than 40-50 seconds without damaging the paint and/or hull integrity (this is mandated by Lockheed) and the mach limit was reduced from 1.44 to 1.30 in the A/C variants, but only mach 1.2 for 20 seconds in the B version. Yes you read that correctly, 20 seconds of full power mach 1.2 flight before having to switch the afterburners off. On the other hand, the new J35 has a twin engine design using updated domestic engines this time with much more power than the F35 using it's single P&W engine. Pilots really prefer having 2 engines not just for higher acceleration and top speed, ability to supercruise without afterburner, but also because if one engine fails you can still bring it back home. This is a major limitation of the F35 as many compromises were made to the design to accommodate the modular approach. So already the J35 has a clear advantage on top speed with an estimate of mach 1.8-2.0, a supercruise est of 1.4-1.5, longer range, better acceleration, higher combat ceiling and better overall kinematic performance that comes with twin thrust vectoring engines. This jet has a lot of potential right off the bat with their design choices, but nobody can know how well their stealth or electronic systems perform yet...
speed isnt that important in bvr fights. hiding is. second in regular flight speed reigmes the f35 engine is extremely reliable so no need for second engine and all the complication that brings. if the f35 is in a dog fight something already went very wrong. seems like your the opposite of the china bad people which is also not helpful.
@@marsmotionIf your opponent gets to the fight before you do you have a problem it does not matter if you're stealth, if the enemy can play cat and mouse with you that's a problem. In any US China war the Us would be the one reaching out that's already a disadvantage. Don't get me started on the F-35 using oil as coolant, or the fact cooling is a major issue for it's electronics, they're still trying to fix it in the newest batch. Not to mention that single engine is a problem, high bypass means it eats aircraft space for lunch, bisecting the weapon bays limiting it's A2A
@@marsmotionalso just to be clear, if you're in a battle of 5th gens being slow is still a big downside as you can't runaway faster than they can catch up Edit: can't, really should turn of auto correct
They littearly had to. The engines China produces have way less thrust than Western engines. And since they pissed off the west, no ones going to sell them more powerfull jets. So they probably doubled the engines to get okish performance out of it.
Do you mean that you and I both have two legs, two arms, and one head, so you are imitating me? Most cars are the same these days, so who copied whom? So when developing an aircraft, you only need to develop aerodynamic layout, and there is no need to research flight control systems, engines, stealth coatings, etc.? Moreover, if you have seen the comparison between f35 and j35, you will find that the two are fundamentally different.
to summarize what you said: - every planes with 2 wings are a copy of US design - you don't know how good J-35 is, but you know it is not as good as F-35 what a smarty pants
The guy is a clown. He's British and accusing China of stealing. He should look in the mirror and he would see that he is a descendant of colonizers who invaded, raped, pilaged, enslaved, and colonized the majority of the world. Instead of accusing China, he should spend his time advocating the return of all the stolen artifacts in the british musuem.
@@ryannur7467 j20 is 4.5 gen fighter, not 5th. But those 2 definitely also take inspiration, but they are allys of the US so it's more fair. Also the video is about the j35 not those
@mab2187 nope. Both of them are using copied shit. America has a 30 year advantage on advanced plane devlopement over china via the Soviets . That and German scientists mean that American technology is second to none. It's just that some of it is not mass produced by us and is ended up being used by our alllies
Agreed. J-20 is aggressively sharp and angular while also remaining streamlined. Its very aesthetically pleasing and unique, partially from being unique and exotic. I also happen to like the F-35 for a similar reason; its unconventional "bumpy" lower side also looks exotic, which is why I like it. F-22 and J-35 are sleek but "vanilla" designs.
A Chinese threat to the usa navy… A threat to the USA in Chinese waters close to Chinese mainland, half way across the world in Asia… over 6 thousand miles away from the united states in America. What sort of logic induces someone to think that anything in that statement is normal or acceptable on how to treat others.
@cheungchingtong it confuses me how some people come to this stupidity, China wants to invade Taiwan, USA is protecting a close ally, its really not that difficult man
@@jacob12t It also confuses me how some people come to this stupidity, it is an unfinished civil war between Maindland China and Taiwan, and the US has no intention to protect it but making every penny it could from that Island, which is not its ally, even in its official statement, the US government officially recognizes one China policy, same in the constitution of the Republic of China(Taiwan's true name). It is really not that difficult man, go figure out, pffff.
@ I guess the coincidence. Probably that is the only part that is justifiably possible that the ccp copied from the f-35, I bet the number 35 sounded cool in Chinese?
@@ilovemylife878 Looks can be deceptive. Let’s use the eurocopter tiger as an example, is that a copy of the Apache? The tiger entered service in 2003 whereas the Apache entered service in the 1980s! Or even the a129 mangusta? What about the TF-Kaan? Why are not a lot of people calling the kaan a copy when they are calling the j-35a a copy? Politics I guess.
I found no one to talk realistically. China has progressed in every field with its own abilities but everyone following Americans and Indians to mention copy copy copy culture. First most 5th gen fighters will be close to each other regarding design. The 2nd one that how can a country copy radar,engine,avionics,integrated weapons,pods etc someone to reply as its requires its own RND and tech. Zhuhai airshow explains this much and will blow your mind which i mentioned so kindly avoid a copy copy lollipop to audience and give realistic contents
Because both Korea and Japan want to be the best American watchdog, Indians feel that they are the strongest human beings in the galaxy, because they can live in cow dung, but China can't. They are not happy to see J35.
Gidday Nick, I hope you are well. I am a homeschooler across the ditch in nz. I want to thank you for all the amazing effort you put into your videos. They are so full of interesting and educational material that it is my number one educational channel. I watch I with my mum and dad a lot and they always find them so fascinating. You are an amazing inspiration to me, and I always look forward to each video that comes out. A big thing I like about you is that you do your best to make each viewer feel appreciated and important. Not many channels do that. So cheers, Nick, and have a good one!!
Jet engine, stolen technology by America from Germany. . Sweptback wings, stolen technology by America from Germany. Divertless intake, stolen technology by America from Italy. F35 VTOL, stolen technology by America from USSR. Flying wing, stolen technology by America from Germany. Stealth technology, stolen technology by America from USSR. Gun powder, stolen technology by the world from China. Cannon, stolen technology by the world from China. Crossbow, stolen technology by the world from China. Magazine for guns, stolen technology by America from Chinese repeat crossbow. Why did US jet fighters look so much like Soviet fighters. Hmmmm. What's the old saying? The one that smelt it dealt it.
One of the problems with China simply copying US tech is that it won't freak the US out enough to make a generational leap in aircraft tech because we will already know what the aircraft is capable of. Unlike what the soviets did that spawned icons like the SR-71, F117, F-15, and F-22. I like when generational leaps are made and tech is pushed to near breaking point
F-15 wasn't "spawned" by the MiG-25, the program already existed even before the MiG-25 flew. F-22 was the product of a program for a 5th gen Air Superiority Fighter, which wasn't a response to anything the Russians were building. SR-71 was spawned because of the need for photo-recon on a better platform than the U-2, although being much more expensive, it never flew over USSR air space. F-117 wasn't spawned by the Soviets at all, it was purely a development to try out stealth.
Oh ye, that one time US claims it has a hypersonic missile to bring the Soviet Union to the knees in an economic war? Guess that spawns a whole new branch in the PLA. Wdym by copying? The only thing that is the same is the design, not the electronics, weapons etc, unless that hurts your feelings on two countries having the same design.
2 engines will outperform 1 engine. Energy in air combat is key (potential energy from altitude Work = Force * distance = mass of aircraft*g*altitude plus kinetic energy = 0.5* mass* velocity**2). Energy is rapidly depleted when making hard turns. Hard turns is what makes a superior close air combat fighter. Two engines restores the aircraft’s energy faster than one engine. If dimensions are similar to the F35, then aerodynamic performance will likely be similar. However, 2 engines will allow higher speed which is crucial for several reasons (1… escape unfavorable scenarios to fight another day. 2… arrive at key locations faster for tactical advantage 3… higher airspeed at launch gives missiles longer range). Two engines will give the J35 superior performance at higher altitudes. (1… Air launched missiles at high altitude have longer range 2… air combat at higher altitudes 3… more efficient cruise at higher altitude) J35 is a more recent design than the F35 so it likely incorporated more advanced technology. Although technology refresh updates to the F35 help keep it state of the art, this is not as effective as a total aircraft redesign from scratch based on the latest technology. Also J35 undergoes more rapid redesigns than F35. The whole U.S. military acquisition process is based on a rigid approval process that ignores obvious necessary changes. These changes are held up and saved for a new upgrade cycle under a new contract. Company management is focused on delivering what the existing contract requires to the exclusion of what has been learned since the contract was signed. This includes continuing useless work overcome by events just to get paid. Companies simply look forward to making more money to fix problems outside the original contract requirements with a new contract after making the maximum money off the current contract. This means they deliberately hide issues in order to not give justification for stopping work on what was contractually required. The net result is a major time delay in getting the ideal delivered product and overly expensive development cost.
I did a personal research and I found something Convair made called the XC-99. It looks like the B-39 but made from wish and made for long distances cargo. Please do a video about this.
Yes, because clearly the city had produced it. Sane think as referring to be living in Moscow, and talking about the river Moscow not the city itself. It's meaning dependent on common sense. That's how our everyday language works.
@@Eric-bq3dr Except the F-35 is: 1. Already fully introduced and in service across the US and the world 2. Is constantly being upgraded to newer technology because the technology nearly 20 years ago when the F-35 first flew is no longer cutting edge. So actually the comparison to the iPhone 16 Pro Max is spot on, as the iPhone 16 is based off the iPhone 12, just upgraded
Your comment on “ copycat” is a bit harsh. How about Turkey and South Korea 5th Gens? They all look like the F22! But the J35A is lot more advanced than US F35.
Why do you think the Chinese knock off is more advanced? It's hard to be more advanced when you are copying. China is not an innovative country unless you count hacking. You can find pretty much every design they have ever used in other countries weaponry. Mostly Russian and US. There is no evidence to the claim the J-35A is more advanced especially with Chinese limits on advance micro processing chips. Even the carrier it will be launched from is a rip off done poorly.
Originally Chengdu is often nicked name Chengheed Martin and Shenyang has been called Shenkhoi since Chengdu designs are more similar to Western design while Shenyang's aircrafts have been more soviet influenced.
Put two side by side Them u see the intake shapes are different The wing & tips not same Back is so different 1 engine to 2 engine, size & shape also Most of all the missile bay are totally different F35 length smaller with big engine Cramping hidden missiles separate 2 sides While J-35 has a clear full missile one bay Basically totally different aerodynamic What's same are the features & gears J-35 is meant to counter F-35 so their gear is set up to match same
different radar, different control software, different weapons, different length, different weight, different sturcutre materials....they just have the same role, but two different planes from scretch. you cant really copy airplanes, period
@@Re0ns F-117 only had early stealth, it was also overall absolutely bad, there's no space to fit radars, internal bays could only fit Sidewinders, no RWR, engines couldn't go supersonic, etc. Overall it wasn't great. X-32 lost due to obvious reasons, being more expensive to build and Boeing. It's also YF-23 and not XF-23, anyways while it is a great design on-paper, it was still more expensive and NG couldn't provide a finished product.
@@captives6479 Not quite right. The US military has about 600 F-35, but due to severe maintenance issues, about half of them are not operationally ready at any given time. That's pretty bad.
20 years ago: Beraly managing to produce soviet era fighter jets, while having all the info and guidance of russian engineers. Today: Mass producing 2 of the most advanced aircraft on the planet. Thats an insane rate of improovment
Arguably it’s not a “this, not that” it’s an incredible rate of improvement THANKS to their ability to copy steal and reverse engineer. You still need to be able to engineer and design in order to make your technology work, but they were able to simply skip a lot of the development cycle by copying and stealing. Not honourable but almost impressive
@@justplanecrazy5575 yeah because there are so many planes out there that look like the J20. Oh wait, it looks nothing like any other fighter. Gtfoh with that desperate cope.
@ I’m just gonna remind you of the hundreds of ripped off car models in China, the Comac ARJ21, Comac C919, J-35 and many more… let that just sink in a bit.
J35 looks more concise and beautiful, should be more invisible than F35 under radar. Also, when you consider the significant advantage of J35 in range and speed, the fat F35 can't be its competitor in future.
Correction: fair competition is good (cheating and stealing is worse and should never be held in high regard by anyone or any nation who aspires to be the best).
There are some crucial things that you did not mention: 1. the J 35 does not have vertical takeoff capabilities. (The F 35 does, but it is used for short runway takeoff in most cases due to high fuel burn); 2. the J 35, being a twin engine jet, flies faster at Mach 2.2 than F 35 at Mach 1.6. 3. The most significant similarity between the two is not the aerodynamic shapes, but the techniques used in making these jets. They both adopted integrated components made by stamping and simplistic design.
well...as you can hear from his tone and the sour exit of the video, this video is based on condescending the chinese airforce rather than a straight up comparison.
I'm sure China wouldn't let their aircraft industry degrade and fall to shambles like every other industry: food, housing, automotive, electronics, etc.
I have no doubt the J-35 can match a Mig. But I highly doubt the J-35 is as stealthy as the F-35 and probably has worse reliability as the weakness of all of China's fighters is their inability to manufacture comparable engines to Russia or America.
Please mr found and explained, I request that you do a video on the BAE Tempest, because if you got info on the j-35, you can get info on the Tempest. Please like this comment so it attracts his attention.
You mean British-Japanese-Italian GCAP? I believe the problem is that it's still constantly evolving, and it's not clear what technologies are going to go in it. For example, before joining forces with the British, the Japanese were experimenting with integrating radars into aircraft skin, so it both had a giant omnidirectional radar and could actively mess up with plane's radar return creating so-called "active stealth". If this technology works and is expected to go onto GCAP , it's gonna be truly a sixth generation fighter. All we know, is that currently it's gonna be a large delta wing fighter, with presumably very long range and it's intended to have engines with very high electric output and electronics cooling capability, but not a word about electronics itself.
Many people in the comment section say that China's fighter jet plagiarizes the US F35. In fact, it is not right to make such an evaluation. China's J-35 using dual engine , while F35 using the single engine category. J35 is larger in size than F35 and has a combat radius twice that of F35. J35 is equipped with anti stealth fighter radar, while the US till now does not have anti stealth fighter radar. J35 also has supersonic cruise capability. F35 It is impossible to do supersonic cruise. There are similarities from the side, but in fact, the differences are very big. The various electronic devices, avionics systems, software, etc. inside the fuselage are completely different. All of them are the results of Chinese engineers' research and development. All of them are made in China, especially the engines, which are 100% Chinese technology. China's fighter planes must use their own systems and need to be interconnected with other Chinese fighter planes. If the fighter planes are so easy to copy, Japan, Türkiye, South Korea, Australia, and many European countries all have F35. Why can't they produce a successful stealth fighter? China's own engine technology is now very mature, which is the result of the efforts of Chinese engine engineers for decades, So when it comes to smearing China, just a little mental rotation will reveal that there is no basis for smearing China's plagiarism. China is not just a fighter jet. In recent years, various new weapons and equipment have been launched and put into mass production in the field of national defense, reflecting the overall significant improvement of China's industrial strength. Now, China's annual industrial output is higher than the combined annual industrial output of the second to tenth places in the world. This is a reflection of China's industrial strength. The US F35 and F22 will actually lag behind China's J35 and J20 in technology in the future. China's anti stealth radar and PL19 missile with a range of 400 kilometers carried by fighter jets can completely make the US stealth fighter lose its combat advantage. Military technology is constantly improving. The fighter jet looks old
Interesting. I really like China's approach to upgrading their military. Gather intel, steal technology, adapt it to Chinese criterias and conditions and make it quickly. They have impressive industrial capabilities as we all know. They simply do not have the time and resources to design everything from scratch. Their tech might be slightly worse than the west's, but I still think it is capable and I think them being able to produce a lot of it quickly outweighs the potential downsides.
@@Orc_Remover Industrial capabilities can only go so far when your enemy is already the largest army on earth multiple times over. Despite having a ton of industrial capacity, the quality is just not there. Its nice being able to produce tons of guns for cheap, but when every gun is firing rounds that tumble, you might as well have just bought guns from someone else.
Chinas like "yeah, we stole this too... yep, didn't even change the name, really (sniff), yeah, we cut down on a room full of engineers with that move, not changing the name... and we use two engines, because (sniff), you know, we use bottle rockets for power... and, you know, its better to look fabulous than to be fabulous, baby"
The US is already building (or has built) a prototype of a 6th generation aircraft. The program is called NGAD(or Next Generation Air Dominance) the fighter(the aircraft) is called F/A-XX made by Lockheed Martin. They said it should enter production in 2026 or 2027.
It’s literally a copy of the J29 and a copy of the F35. You can literally look at the fuselage and it’s the exact same as the J20, with different wings, and a different rear end. That’s it. On top of the fact that they got these aircraft done in such quick time, it’s gonna be extra shit.
@@leogazebo5290 Fair point. We don't know the capabilities of the CAF. It's a wise strategist who assumes that its potential is meaningful. Btw Asiatimes (okay, it's Asiatimes) reported that the CAF has a radar that can track stealth aircraft.
J35 is 2.2 Mach, F35 is 1.8 Mach. J35 radar detection range 250 km, F35 200 km. Radar reflection J35 is 25 times smaller than F35. Go figure the rest. J35 looks somewhat similar to F35. However, F35 is too heavy, too fat, too slow, combat radius too short, weapon bay too little, air to air missile range too short, fuel tank is too little, no super cruise capability, not to mention engines failures too often. Chinese J35 help US corrects all these problems and it beats F35 in every way. F22 also can hardly be upgraded to adopt latest technology. Meanwhile J-20 have lots of upgrade potential. Its latest version J-20B is considerably more capable than its first version. Unlike F-22 China has been continuously chucking out J-20B,J-20S… It’s already at the north of 300. By mid 2025 it will be twice as many J-20 as F-22. Not to mention the latest electronic warfare version of the J-20S is used for the drone host, because the J-20S has 2 seats, one person controls the aircraft and the other controls the drone swarm. In the future, one J-20S will lead a swarm of 20 CASC Rainbow drones to fight. How do F22 and F35 attack J-20S and J-35? The U.S. is responsible for fantasy and making PPT, and China is responsible for realizing fantasy. This is the current situation.
i have never seen such a stupid comment, my mind is absolutely blown. we dont know basically ANYTHING about the latest chinese fighters, you are only speculating, chinese tech in aviation is less than american's considering that the new j35 still has a hud
Chines spying stealing and copying is outstanding. However, it still doesn't come close to the F-22 and F-35 in real world use. The reason the J-35 has two engines is because of two reasons: 1. The engines are not that reliable coz the ChiComs can't make advanced turbine engine blades. 2. A single WS-13 engine does not provide enough power, so two are needed.
Compared to F-35, J-20 is already found to be a less stealthy aircraft according to a 3rd party CAD study done on Aircraft 101. So will J-35 be any different? More likely not but only time will tell.
J35 looks somewhat similar to F35; however, F35 is too heavy, too fat, too slow; combat radius too short, weapon bay too little, air to air missile range too short, fuel tank is too little; no super cruise capability, not as stealthy; not to mention engines failures too often. Chinese J35 help US corrects all these problems and it beats F35 in every way.😎
@@ZETA14.88 No vertical take-off. And the A and C models use the same frame, which is why they are also chonkeh. But design-wise, the J35 looks pretty sick ngl
@@LastGoatKnight. Reports say the J35 is faster, and has a higher service ceiling than the F35. But this is a trick the Russians (Then Soviets) played on us once. I forget which plane (Though I remember it was a “Twin-tail, twin-engined” aircraft. The thing was supposed to be unbelievably fast…. Then it was caught on radar going an absolutely crazy speed (Can’t remember that either, but it was a lot faster than any interceptor, or multi role fighter in U.S. inventory.). We came to find out, later, that the Soviets had purposely let the U.S. catch it on radar, so we would be worried about how fast it was. A while later, we managed to get a hold of one of those planes…. Come to find out; The plane could go that fast, but only for a very short time, and within a few minutes, the engines were damaged beyond repair!!! So the Soviets trashed two of their newest and most technologically advanced engines, just to scare the U.S.! Worth it? Gorbachev thought so!
Well, although I am Chinese, I still have to say something bad about CPC. In fact, most of the Chinese variants of SU27/30 are not manufactured under license. Only the first small batch is like this. The agreement also stipulates that key components must be imported from Russia. Later, China secretly produced a lot of parts and then mass-produced J16s beyond the authorized quantity. Russia was very angry about this. As a compromise, China promised not to promote the Chinese variants to the international market. Obviously, J16 is more competitive than SU30.
erm actually its not copying 2 engine vs 1 is a giant design defference and yes it copies some designs because it helps improve the performace and america does same to if u see ur enemy using a new amazing thing, u would also want to copy the amazing thing so ur listening to AMERCAN PROPAGANDA
We know that this kind of aircraft is a top-notch industrial design. If you think it is stolen just because of its similar appearance, wouldn’t it mean that all developed countries in the world can copy the shell and then declare to have fifth-generation fighters? brother! Don't ignore the efforts of the Chinese people, they are far beyond your imagination!
if you ask the real aeronautical engineering they all will say it impossible to copy modern aircraft because it was make from hundreds of thousand part with specific technique to make
Dassault Aviation: Make BAGUETTE Great Again 🥖
Sure, Comrade @linkdiablo4476! Whatever you're told to say, right?🤣
Sure, Jan!🤣
@@JohnnyG-b7j But dude, it's true. I was in the USAF doing flight line maintenance. You can't just copy a part - the philosophy of how parts integrate and wear over time is dependent upon the designer's predicted maintenance schedules. Think of Honda - they are well known to be forgiving with maintenance and will last forever - meanwhile an old Ford can keep running especially if you keep up with maintenance. Honda is thoughtful that their consumers may not do as much maintenance as Ford will do. The American military is obsessive about maintenance, it's why we have aircraft built in the 1950's still doing operations today. How often will China strip their J35 to the frame and xray it for microscopic failures? The USAF is doing this every 10 years. A very small thing like replacing O-rings on a regular basis can make the difference between combat ready and a "hanger queen" - and if one military anticipates changing that O-ring twice a year, another military replaces it only once every 5 years, it's a huge difference in failure rate.
You’d be right, but that’s not accounting for documents stolen directly from the program. Either way, it didn’t take them long to catch up.
The F-35 is a single-engine aircraft. The J-35 is a twin-engine aircraft. This is a significant design difference.
yes exactly SO evryone is yapping about COPY CHINA IS COPY copy 100MILLION INDVIDUAL TINY PARTS AMERICA PROPAGANDA BLABALBAL
You only give a fighter 2 engines if you can’t achieve the performance you need with 1 engine
@@besh7408 This is patently false.
@@besh7408 so you better have one eye only.
@@horridohobbies It's because the F135 engine on the F-35 is that powerful. Even 2 x WS-21 can't match the thrust performance of a single F135. And this is b4 the Block IV upgrades for F135 engine. Maybe if they give J-35 2 x WS-15 would it match if not exceed a single F135 engine.
No aircraft Is invisible, just hard to detect
I beg to differ, have you ever seen the reptilians who control us' ships? No that's because they are invisible.
Nope they are easy to detect but difficult to track i.e. to lock onto.
And everone in Serbia knows it
Not hard to detect.. easy to detect actually..... however getting a weapons grade lock... thats a little difficult
AirBus and Dassault Aviation:hold our 🥐
Why do aviation industries love the number "35" so much？This world already has F-35, Su-35, MiG-35, and now J-35.
SAAB J35 Draken made its first flight in 1955, a revolutionary design. Some countries are decades behind in that aspect. 🙂
36C and 34D are Bra Sizes 👀
69 next?
Easy. J means ‘kill’ in Chinese.
@@spvlinn9009 J=Annihilation
you are right
I love how this video condescend the J20. "it's a copy of refale mixed with F22" that's almost to say a pagani zonda is a mix of Lamborghini and a Ferrari.
What? That entire sentence was much more complimentary of the J20 than the J35, he calls it "a unique design taking characteristics from the rafale and the F22" and then goes on to call the J35 much less innovative and pretty much a copy
If you just want to be mad at the comparisons sure, but to say that sentence condescends the J20 is exactly the opposite of what its tone was lol
How to not copy? Don't have wing.. Then it's will be original.
chinese bot alert
The J-35 is exactly how i wanted the F-35 to look like
LMAO it is MUCH more goodlooking
meh, i get that, one super engine versus two Chinese bottle-rockets looks--- better? lol, no, really, the F-22 is nice, nothing compared to the YF-23, but the F-35 looks a bit like a little Nome (spelling?), but what is being loaded in it and upgrading... it's a little beast, and ~inexpensive~ finally. The fleet Isreal ticked Iran with were drop-dead invisible. They had no chance, and less now because Isreal reduced Irans radars and sams. The best is that the F-117 is still around and still the smallest return of any aircraft, including the F-22/
@@viciousstarfishlmao you forgot the engine failures coming from the f35’s? Why do you sound proud of having those engines?😂
@@viciousstarfish Why can J35 achieve a super cruise of 1.5 Mach and a maximum flight speed of 2.2 Mach. The maximum flight speed of F35 is only 1.6 Mach, and it cannot achieve supersonic cruising. Additionally, dual engines in naval fighter jets are always safer than conventional engines. This is the experience that Americans have summed up with their blood. Now unscrupulous enterprises have killed the contribution of naval pilots for the sake of interests.
@@SpruceWood-NEGIt can't yet. There are some tests for the WS-19, and the WS-21 is still a few years away. It can do that eventually, but not yet.
Ngl its look much better than the f35, and less fat
doesn have vertical takeoff capability, which isnt a real requirement in the chinese military.
@@lexsaplathe verical takeoff is only on the F-35B which the marines use the F-35C dosent have vertical takeoff
It's a mix of the SU-57, F-22, and F-35 looks wise so that makes sense
@@bennettsorrells5494 Nice design (sorry, now it belong to me hhh - J35 designer
@@bennettsorrells5494 not necessarilly the su57, nothing to copy from + isn't a legit 5th gen fighter
If the Chinese took the data files from Lockheed, unless we took their designs, then it means they have the advantage (they know what we are using but we don't know what they have). There are a lot of actual fighter pilots on UA-cam talking about the F35, you'll realize it's not at all bells & roses. About 50% of the entire F35 fleet is grounded due to excessive failures and needed repairs according to US congress.
Add to that, the F35 is called "Fat Amy" for a reason, as it's actually a downgrade in performance in many areas compared to the twin engine jets it's suppose to replace. For example, the engine can't be run at full Military Power for more than 40-50 seconds without damaging the paint and/or hull integrity (this is mandated by Lockheed) and the mach limit was reduced from 1.44 to 1.30 in the A/C variants, but only mach 1.2 for 20 seconds in the B version. Yes you read that correctly, 20 seconds of full power mach 1.2 flight before having to switch the afterburners off.
On the other hand, the new J35 has a twin engine design using updated domestic engines this time with much more power than the F35 using it's single P&W engine. Pilots really prefer having 2 engines not just for higher acceleration and top speed, ability to supercruise without afterburner, but also because if one engine fails you can still bring it back home. This is a major limitation of the F35 as many compromises were made to the design to accommodate the modular approach. So already the J35 has a clear advantage on top speed with an estimate of mach 1.8-2.0, a supercruise est of 1.4-1.5, longer range, better acceleration, higher combat ceiling and better overall kinematic performance that comes with twin thrust vectoring engines.
This jet has a lot of potential right off the bat with their design choices, but nobody can know how well their stealth or electronic systems perform yet...
speed isnt that important in bvr fights. hiding is. second in regular flight speed reigmes the f35 engine is extremely reliable so no need for second engine and all the complication that brings. if the f35 is in a dog fight something already went very wrong. seems like your the opposite of the china bad people which is also not helpful.
@@marsmotionIf your opponent gets to the fight before you do you have a problem it does not matter if you're stealth, if the enemy can play cat and mouse with you that's a problem. In any US China war the Us would be the one reaching out that's already a disadvantage.
Don't get me started on the F-35 using oil as coolant, or the fact cooling is a major issue for it's electronics, they're still trying to fix it in the newest batch.
Not to mention that single engine is a problem, high bypass means it eats aircraft space for lunch, bisecting the weapon bays limiting it's A2A
@@marsmotionalso just to be clear, if you're in a battle of 5th gens being slow is still a big downside as you can't runaway faster than they can catch up
Edit: can't, really should turn of auto correct
你不应该这么消息灵通的。。🤭
@@marsmotion I knew it, the F-35 is a big fat failure.
its like f35's engine got "double it and pass it to the next person"
They littearly had to. The engines China produces have way less thrust than Western engines. And since they pissed off the west, no ones going to sell them more powerfull jets. So they probably doubled the engines to get okish performance out of it.
Slava TSMC 🇹🇼
Do you mean that you and I both have two legs, two arms, and one head, so you are imitating me? Most cars are the same these days, so who copied whom? So when developing an aircraft, you only need to develop aerodynamic layout, and there is no need to research flight control systems, engines, stealth coatings, etc.? Moreover, if you have seen the comparison between f35 and j35, you will find that the two are fundamentally different.
That’s one sleek looking bird
to summarize what you said:
- every planes with 2 wings are a copy of US design
- you don't know how good J-35 is, but you know it is not as good as F-35
what a smarty pants
@MMA-gb6to Smarty pants, I think you got my vote for using "smarty pants" in a statement, at least it made me laugh 😃...
The guy is a clown. He's British and accusing China of stealing. He should look in the mirror and he would see that he is a descendant of colonizers who invaded, raped, pilaged, enslaved, and colonized the majority of the world. Instead of accusing China, he should spend his time advocating the return of all the stolen artifacts in the british musuem.
@@kc2213 This is such a dogpiss take lmao
meanwhile,cn's navy is a big threat to us,lol
ua-cam.com/video/O6H5Ww7ukG8/v-deo.html
The J-35 looks way better than the F-35.
it looks nothing like the f-35! it has two engines, it’s less stubby slimmer , it’s also longer
All stealth aircraft looks very identical because we know that's how stealth tech works 😅
Su57 vs f22/f35, those 3 are original designs.. the j35 not so much
@xotee6451 J20 is also original design. And what about KF-21 borame and TF-X Kaan? Those 2 looks very similar too.
@@ryannur7467 j20 is 4.5 gen fighter, not 5th. But those 2 definitely also take inspiration, but they are allys of the US so it's more fair. Also the video is about the j35 not those
China built a car with four wheels...
Americans: china copied us.
You cannot seriously believe they didn't copy this design
@@EvanG529 this is just a pretty standard aircrafy design with regular layout and looks pretty well. f35 is not the first to adopt such a design.
@@EvanG529 Can you return the compass and gunpowder made in China thousands of years ago?
@@EvanG529 bcz someone copy that
CCP bot spotted.
Design wise, I prefer the Gyrfalcon over Fat Amy. J35 is slimmer while the F35 just looks like a fat bird!
That's cus the f35 is meant to be a flying computer
@@krisshnapeswanipeswani3190 Sure, and I presume the J-20 and J-35 are also comprised of sophisticated tech and computers.
@mab2187 nope. Both of them are using copied shit. America has a 30 year advantage on advanced plane devlopement over china via the Soviets . That and German scientists mean that American technology is second to none. It's just that some of it is not mass produced by us and is ended up being used by our alllies
I also prefer the Gyrfalcon over the J20. Just a better looking plane.
fr, the single engine design makes the F-35 look bloated
so far my fav is J20. Super hot looking jet. Second choice will be Dassault Rafale.
J20S
Slava BAGUETTE 🥖 Heroyam Croissant 🥐
NIEN the GRIPEN BETTER THAN RAFALE
Agreed. J-20 is aggressively sharp and angular while also remaining streamlined. Its very aesthetically pleasing and unique, partially from being unique and exotic. I also happen to like the F-35 for a similar reason; its unconventional "bumpy" lower side also looks exotic, which is why I like it. F-22 and J-35 are sleek but "vanilla" designs.
From the past 1 months Pakistan is also super involved in j35 and have sent pilots to test it. They may become the first buyers
In fact they have already made a purchase.
@@wedmunds where is the money?
@@hudrobin1671 where is the money lebowski!!!
Buy with what ? Goats ? 😂
Didn't like 80% of their country flood? How are they affording these?
Are the Chinese selling it to them with a 960 month auto loan?
As 13/11/2024 the j 35b has officially entered service.
A Chinese threat to the usa navy…
A threat to the USA in Chinese waters close to Chinese mainland, half way across the world in Asia…
over 6 thousand miles away from the united states in America.
What sort of logic induces someone to think that anything in that statement is normal or acceptable on how to treat others.
The typical American logic of "we own the world"?
you have much to learn about defense and military matters son.
The US has sworn to defend taiwan, so chinese military escalation directed at taiwan is a threat to the US military. Literally as simple as that.
@cheungchingtong it confuses me how some people come to this stupidity, China wants to invade Taiwan, USA is protecting a close ally, its really not that difficult man
@@jacob12t It also confuses me how some people come to this stupidity, it is an unfinished civil war between Maindland China and Taiwan, and the US has no intention to protect it but making every penny it could from that Island, which is not its ally, even in its official statement, the US government officially recognizes one China policy, same in the constitution of the Republic of China(Taiwan's true name). It is really not that difficult man, go figure out, pffff.
Well why do you call these designs copycats? What do you want a 5th generation fighter to look like????
Quite the coincidence the j35 and f35 share the same names, no?
@ I guess the coincidence. Probably that is the only part that is justifiably possible that the ccp copied from the f-35, I bet the number 35 sounded cool in Chinese?
look at all military chinese helis and planes and compare them to other countries
@@ilovemylife878 Looks can be deceptive. Let’s use the eurocopter tiger as an example, is that a copy of the Apache? The tiger entered service in 2003 whereas the Apache entered service in the 1980s! Or even the a129 mangusta? What about the TF-Kaan? Why are not a lot of people calling the kaan a copy when they are calling the j-35a a copy? Politics I guess.
@@BITStudioCodebc we know china steal American and European IP.
They are open and honest about it.
It should be swimming Jet like F-35
F-35 Swimming from Pacific to Atlantic Ocean
?
@flakbusenjoyer how many times F-35 plunged into ocean?
Japan sea by Japanese Navy
south China Sea by US Navy
Atlantic sea by UK navy
F35 can autopilot to nowhere and skydive too
@TheKkpop1 F-35 Submarine mode
your car has two lights just like mine, you are copying mine.
Dassault Aviation and AirBus: Please, hold our Croissant 🥐
It is literally stolen tech that looks exactly alike except it has 2 engines
your car also look eerily similar in design
@@ATownDown32 🤣🤣 by your logic, the laferrari is like a s2000 except it has hydrate system.
I found no one to talk realistically.
China has progressed in every field with its own abilities but everyone following Americans and Indians to mention copy copy copy culture.
First most 5th gen fighters will be close to each other regarding design.
The 2nd one that how can a country copy radar,engine,avionics,integrated weapons,pods etc someone to reply as its requires its own RND and tech.
Zhuhai airshow explains this much and will blow your mind which i mentioned so kindly avoid a copy copy lollipop to audience and give realistic contents
Americans can analyze these two aircraft from a professional perspective, but why do people from other countries just mock and criticize them?
No clue. Its annoying
because they have know clue how grown ups are playing games
Because both Korea and Japan want to be the best American watchdog, Indians feel that they are the strongest human beings in the galaxy, because they can live in cow dung, but China can't. They are not happy to see J35.
It's a complicated question, but I know the answer.😂
Because they don't🤣
Gidday Nick, I hope you are well. I am a homeschooler across the ditch in nz. I want to thank you for all the amazing effort you put into your videos. They are so full of interesting and educational material that it is my number one educational channel. I watch I with my mum and dad a lot and they always find them so fascinating. You are an amazing inspiration to me, and I always look forward to each video that comes out. A big thing I like about you is that you do your best to make each viewer feel appreciated and important. Not many channels do that.
So cheers, Nick, and have a good one!!
Jeremy Clarkson once said it best :
"It seems, then, that the expression "copyright infringement" doesn't translate terribly well into Mandarin."
and then it's also best that you and Jeremy Clarkson should be reminded of the proverb "all's fair in love and war"
copyright X， copy it in right way √
It will be a pilot choice in the end ...
Jet engine, stolen technology by America from Germany. .
Sweptback wings, stolen technology by America from Germany.
Divertless intake, stolen technology by America from Italy.
F35 VTOL, stolen technology by America from USSR.
Flying wing, stolen technology by America from Germany.
Stealth technology, stolen technology by America from USSR.
Gun powder, stolen technology by the world from China.
Cannon, stolen technology by the world from China.
Crossbow, stolen technology by the world from China.
Magazine for guns, stolen technology by America from Chinese repeat crossbow.
Why did US jet fighters look so much like Soviet fighters.
Hmmmm. What's the old saying? The one that smelt it dealt it.
Slava TSMC 🇹🇼 Geroyam MediaTek 🦾
These machines are a true testament to human innovation and technology!
One of the problems with China simply copying US tech is that it won't freak the US out enough to make a generational leap in aircraft tech because we will already know what the aircraft is capable of. Unlike what the soviets did that spawned icons like the SR-71, F117, F-15, and F-22. I like when generational leaps are made and tech is pushed to near breaking point
F-15 wasn't "spawned" by the MiG-25, the program already existed even before the MiG-25 flew. F-22 was the product of a program for a 5th gen Air Superiority Fighter, which wasn't a response to anything the Russians were building. SR-71 was spawned because of the need for photo-recon on a better platform than the U-2, although being much more expensive, it never flew over USSR air space. F-117 wasn't spawned by the Soviets at all, it was purely a development to try out stealth.
@@M16_Akula-III In fact none of the aircraft that he mentioned were developed as a response to anything the Soviets build :D
Copy single to twin engine design? How?
F15 was much better than any Soviet fighter of the same period
Oh ye, that one time US claims it has a hypersonic missile to bring the Soviet Union to the knees in an economic war? Guess that spawns a whole new branch in the PLA. Wdym by copying? The only thing that is the same is the design, not the electronics, weapons etc, unless that hurts your feelings on two countries having the same design.
2 engines will outperform 1 engine. Energy in air combat is key (potential energy from altitude Work = Force * distance = mass of aircraft*g*altitude plus kinetic energy = 0.5* mass* velocity**2). Energy is rapidly depleted when making hard turns. Hard turns is what makes a superior close air combat fighter. Two engines restores the aircraft’s energy faster than one engine.
If dimensions are similar to the F35, then aerodynamic performance will likely be similar. However, 2 engines will allow higher speed which is crucial for several reasons (1… escape unfavorable scenarios to fight another day. 2… arrive at key locations faster for tactical advantage 3… higher airspeed at launch gives missiles longer range).
Two engines will give the J35 superior performance at higher altitudes. (1… Air launched missiles at high altitude have longer range 2… air combat at higher altitudes 3… more efficient cruise at higher altitude)
J35 is a more recent design than the F35 so it likely incorporated more advanced technology. Although technology refresh updates to the F35 help keep it state of the art, this is not as effective as a total aircraft redesign from scratch based on the latest technology. Also J35 undergoes more rapid redesigns than F35. The whole U.S. military acquisition process is based on a rigid approval process that ignores obvious necessary changes. These changes are held up and saved for a new upgrade cycle under a new contract. Company management is focused on delivering what the existing contract requires to the exclusion of what has been learned since the contract was signed. This includes continuing useless work overcome by events just to get paid. Companies simply look forward to making more money to fix problems outside the original contract requirements with a new contract after making the maximum money off the current contract. This means they deliberately hide issues in order to not give justification for stopping work on what was contractually required. The net result is a major time delay in getting the ideal delivered product and overly expensive development cost.
I was waiting for this.
f35 is a fat vtol and j35 is much thinner. I dont think they are the same at all
There is only one way to find out for sure.
I did a personal research and I found something Convair made called the XC-99. It looks like the B-39 but made from wish and made for long distances cargo. Please do a video about this.
Chengdu is actually a city in China so referring to the company as just "chengdu" is kinda misleading
Yes, because clearly the city had produced it. Sane think as referring to be living in Moscow, and talking about the river Moscow not the city itself. It's meaning dependent on common sense. That's how our everyday language works.
Shenyang is also a city....
Yes, because surely a defense company doesn't use the name of the city or state their founded like Texas....
if someones said they studied at Oxford.... it's also a city...
Gotta give credit to Chengdu for not entirely copying designs
So in a nutshell, F-35 is like an iphone 16 pro max while J-35 lika an Samsung s24 Ultra 😭😭😭
纠正一下F-35的芯片和设计要早8年，所有其实是F-35 就像 iphone 8，而 J-35 就像三星 s24 Ultra
@@Eric-bq3dr Except the F-35 is:
1. Already fully introduced and in service across the US and the world
2. Is constantly being upgraded to newer technology because the technology nearly 20 years ago when the F-35 first flew is no longer cutting edge.
So actually the comparison to the iPhone 16 Pro Max is spot on, as the iPhone 16 is based off the iPhone 12, just upgraded
Samsung is better and I'm 🇬🇧
😂😂😂😂😂 Chinese jets design only for parade and airshow all made in China tofu
Comtinue with that mentality. You guys said same thing for russia but now trumo asking for peace in ukraine 😂😂@dexvilla6159
I have already joined the founding, explain army a long, long time ago
Its beautiful. It looks so much easier to manuever with that size and design. This will be fast and deadly.
Your comment on “ copycat” is a bit harsh. How about Turkey and South Korea 5th Gens? They all look like the F22! But the J35A is lot more advanced than US F35.
Turkey and South Korea has partnered with Lockheed Martin the company who created F22 and F35 to produce their own versions.
Why do you think the Chinese knock off is more advanced? It's hard to be more advanced when you are copying. China is not an innovative country unless you count hacking. You can find pretty much every design they have ever used in other countries weaponry. Mostly Russian and US. There is no evidence to the claim the J-35A is more advanced especially with Chinese limits on advance micro processing chips. Even the carrier it will be launched from is a rip off done poorly.
😂😂😂 pretty funny !
We got many thousands of YTBers trying to prove themselves being an expert on science and engineering, how many of them you think they are qualified?
Yes, "copycat" is not exactly the correct term. It should be "thief" instead.
11 seconds ago is diabolical
Originally Chengdu is often nicked name Chengheed Martin and Shenyang has been called Shenkhoi since Chengdu designs are more similar to Western design while Shenyang's aircrafts have been more soviet influenced.
It’s just an f35 with 2 engines and a different vertical stabiliser
Put two side by side
Them u see the intake shapes are different
The wing & tips not same
Back is so different 1 engine to 2 engine, size & shape also
Most of all the missile bay are totally different
F35 length smaller with big engine
Cramping hidden missiles separate 2 sides
While J-35 has a clear full missile one bay
Basically totally different aerodynamic
What's same are the features & gears
J-35 is meant to counter F-35 so their gear is set up to match same
different radar, different control software, different weapons, different length, different weight, different sturcutre materials....they just have the same role, but two different planes from scretch. you cant really copy airplanes, period
Also faster, better, slim body with superior avionics
The English language is just Mandarin with different alphabet, words and grammer.
one is a slim lady and the other pregnant aunty... very different
The overwhelming emphasis on design reveals the shallowness of the analysis of China’s critics.
It’s a stealth jet. There are very, very, very few designs for a stealth jet so obviously it is going to be similar.
X-32, XF-23, F-117.
@@Re0ns F-117 only had early stealth, it was also overall absolutely bad, there's no space to fit radars, internal bays could only fit Sidewinders, no RWR, engines couldn't go supersonic, etc. Overall it wasn't great. X-32 lost due to obvious reasons, being more expensive to build and Boeing. It's also YF-23 and not XF-23, anyways while it is a great design on-paper, it was still more expensive and NG couldn't provide a finished product.
@@Re0nsf117 can't go supersonic. Wasn't designed to.
Dude, they literally had the data to copy it. Keep coping.
@@Ghent_Halcyon stealing data is not only for copying, but also to learn about its weaknesses.
1000 F35s, but how many are operational?
Reportedly, at any given time, only about half of the F-35 fleet is operational. The F-35 has a serious maintenance issue.
About 600 are operational.
figure fluctuate between 30-50%
@@captives6479 Not quite right. The US military has about 600 F-35, but due to severe maintenance issues, about half of them are not operationally ready at any given time. That's pretty bad.
@@horridohobbies 600 out of 1000 is about half. So I was right.
Wow China...impressive... Thank you...
20 years ago: Beraly managing to produce soviet era fighter jets, while having all the info and guidance of russian engineers.
Today: Mass producing 2 of the most advanced aircraft on the planet.
Thats an insane rate of improovment
There’s no improvement, they just copied designs from the good countries.
Arguably it’s not a “this, not that” it’s an incredible rate of improvement THANKS to their ability to copy steal and reverse engineer. You still need to be able to engineer and design in order to make your technology work, but they were able to simply skip a lot of the development cycle by copying and stealing. Not honourable but almost impressive
@@justplanecrazy5575 yeah because there are so many planes out there that look like the J20. Oh wait, it looks nothing like any other fighter. Gtfoh with that desperate cope.
@@lexsapla struck a nerve did I? Poor baby 😢
@ I’m just gonna remind you of the hundreds of ripped off car models in China, the Comac ARJ21, Comac C919, J-35 and many more… let that just sink in a bit.
hear me out, no matter what country or how good or bad is it we can admire it and the engineers for creating it
Yeah....nope!
@JohnnyG-b7j why not? it's still a beautiful aerocraft non the r lrss6
J35 looks more concise and beautiful, should be more invisible than F35 under radar. Also, when you consider the significant advantage of J35 in range and speed, the fat F35 can't be its competitor in future.
Regardless competition is good. Bully’s don’t pick on people that can fight back
Im not sure if u telling that they screwed for going against f-35 or that the f-35 has no chance or they wouldnt be bullying it
Correction: fair competition is good (cheating and stealing is worse and should never be held in high regard by anyone or any nation who aspires to be the best).
@@JohnnyG-b7j wwlp, usa is known for stealing a lot of stuff too. Just see all the times they yoinked something to study during cold war
They named it j35 intentionally. The same name as F35 will help its promotion.
There are some crucial things that you did not mention: 1. the J 35 does not have vertical takeoff capabilities. (The F 35 does, but it is used for short runway takeoff in most cases due to high fuel burn); 2. the J 35, being a twin engine jet, flies faster at Mach 2.2 than F 35 at Mach 1.6. 3. The most significant similarity between the two is not the aerodynamic shapes, but the techniques used in making these jets. They both adopted integrated components made by stamping and simplistic design.
well...as you can hear from his tone and the sour exit of the video, this video is based on condescending the chinese airforce rather than a straight up comparison.
@@t_w_7821 yeah, the content creator is more like expressing his stance than providing factual comparisons.
Good luck to one mil❤😊
I'm sure China wouldn't let their aircraft industry degrade and fall to shambles like every other industry: food, housing, automotive, electronics, etc.
Its always funny to heard west blame good things are theirs, JF17 prototypes in 2004 arealy have DSI intakes🤣
I have no doubt the J-35 can match a Mig. But I highly doubt the J-35 is as stealthy as the F-35 and probably has worse reliability as the weakness of all of China's fighters is their inability to manufacture comparable engines to Russia or America.
I think it opposite due to F35 chubby shape. It law of physics thing is fatter has easy to see measure and find by any means😁
For the B-type vertical take-off and landing, the F35 made too many compromises.
J-35A is not the carrier version.
Correct, the Navy version will be J-35T, code T stands for Tan-she (弹射/Catapult) in Chinese
@@CarlXu-tmd7456wrong. The carrier based version designated as J-35, while its land based derivative is the J-35A.
Only thing we are certain about is that it is less stealthy then the f-22 because of it’s nozzles aren’t as good as the f-22’s stealth masking the rcs
Couldn't they at least change the number from 35 to something else? It's too obvious...even for China.
thats the point.
J= stands for "annihilation" in Chinese, born to annihilate F35
That's what envious copycats do copy 😂
if you know what J(Jian-歼 j20or j35) stands for , you will understand , it means annihilation. so you know why it's called J35
That's exactly why they name it 35. They want J-35 to compete with F-35, because they both are stealth fighter on carrier.
Nice start dude
They couldn't call it F-35C(hina) because the name is already taken /s
Digging all these modern jets. Some better than others.
Please mr found and explained, I request that you do a video on the BAE Tempest, because if you got info on the j-35, you can get info on the Tempest. Please like this comment so it attracts his attention.
You mean British-Japanese-Italian GCAP? I believe the problem is that it's still constantly evolving, and it's not clear what technologies are going to go in it. For example, before joining forces with the British, the Japanese were experimenting with integrating radars into aircraft skin, so it both had a giant omnidirectional radar and could actively mess up with plane's radar return creating so-called "active stealth". If this technology works and is expected to go onto GCAP , it's gonna be truly a sixth generation fighter. All we know, is that currently it's gonna be a large delta wing fighter, with presumably very long range and it's intended to have engines with very high electric output and electronics cooling capability, but not a word about electronics itself.
@@solarissv777 well what about the eurofighter typhoon
Many people in the comment section say that China's fighter jet plagiarizes the US F35. In fact, it is not right to make such an evaluation. China's J-35 using dual engine , while F35 using the single engine category. J35 is larger in size than F35 and has a combat radius twice that of F35. J35 is equipped with anti stealth fighter radar, while the US till now does not have anti stealth fighter radar. J35 also has supersonic cruise capability. F35 It is impossible to do supersonic cruise. There are similarities from the side, but in fact, the differences are very big. The various electronic devices, avionics systems, software, etc. inside the fuselage are completely different. All of them are the results of Chinese engineers' research and development. All of them are made in China, especially the engines, which are 100% Chinese technology. China's fighter planes must use their own systems and need to be interconnected with other Chinese fighter planes. If the fighter planes are so easy to copy, Japan, Türkiye, South Korea, Australia, and many European countries all have F35. Why can't they produce a successful stealth fighter? China's own engine technology is now very mature, which is the result of the efforts of Chinese engine engineers for decades, So when it comes to smearing China, just a little mental rotation will reveal that there is no basis for smearing China's plagiarism. China is not just a fighter jet. In recent years, various new weapons and equipment have been launched and put into mass production in the field of national defense, reflecting the overall significant improvement of China's industrial strength. Now, China's annual industrial output is higher than the combined annual industrial output of the second to tenth places in the world. This is a reflection of China's industrial strength. The US F35 and F22 will actually lag behind China's J35 and J20 in technology in the future. China's anti stealth radar and PL19 missile with a range of 400 kilometers carried by fighter jets can completely make the US stealth fighter lose its combat advantage. Military technology is constantly improving. The fighter jet looks old
Interesting. I really like China's approach to upgrading their military. Gather intel, steal technology, adapt it to Chinese criterias and conditions and make it quickly. They have impressive industrial capabilities as we all know. They simply do not have the time and resources to design everything from scratch. Their tech might be slightly worse than the west's, but I still think it is capable and I think them being able to produce a lot of it quickly outweighs the potential downsides.
Orc Remover
Obviously you think that only China engages in military espionage
Wake up
那么容易窃取？ 你以为美国CIA是摆设吗？
"China's approach", aka, copy everyone else because your MIC isn't good enough.
@@WarlordEnthusiast You missed my point
@@Orc_Remover Industrial capabilities can only go so far when your enemy is already the largest army on earth multiple times over.
Despite having a ton of industrial capacity, the quality is just not there. Its nice being able to produce tons of guns for cheap, but when every gun is firing rounds that tumble, you might as well have just bought guns from someone else.
And that is why project Tempest data is airgapped and heavily encrypted
Chinas like "yeah, we stole this too... yep, didn't even change the name, really (sniff), yeah, we cut down on a room full of engineers with that move, not changing the name... and we use two engines, because (sniff), you know, we use bottle rockets for power... and, you know, its better to look fabulous than to be fabulous, baby"
Wait till you see where USA stole it's Missile designs from...
Slava MediaTek 🦾 Heroyam TSMC 🇹🇼
That is a good looking jet for sure.
01:35 actually the j20 is a demon child of the f22 and the mig 1.44
That's a miserably stupid combo, as ones strengths cancels out the other, and vice versa.
J-20 design came from the J-9 program, which also birthed the J-10.
@@M16_Akula-III and endless terabytes of stolen classified American documents, but who's keeping track?
The Eurofigjter Typhoon is more of a Mig1.44 than the J-20, have you seen their fronts?
@@PenskePC17 The J20's duck wing design makes up for the lack of engine power very well
The US is already building (or has built) a prototype of a 6th generation aircraft. The program is called NGAD(or Next Generation Air Dominance) the fighter(the aircraft) is called F/A-XX made by Lockheed Martin. They said it should enter production in 2026 or 2027.
they better keep everything shut this time can't have those chinese hackers get everything for free again
It will look like J20 copy cat but don't has vertical fin😁
@@FontaineLoversIt will look like J20 copy cat but don't has vertical fin. 😁
It’s literally a copy of the J29 and a copy of the F35. You can literally look at the fuselage and it’s the exact same as the J20, with different wings, and a different rear end. That’s it. On top of the fact that they got these aircraft done in such quick time, it’s gonna be extra shit.
Same with the Chinese Blackhawk and Apache. They literally just copy the US.
Huh, did they steal our plans
Anyone who underestimates the Chinese fighter planes will do so at their own peril.
Its true they are copying US tech.
Though thats just the point, they just lift shit, they have no creative thinking.
everything is visibility if u open ur eyes
Crazy
Temu F-35
Let's hope so.
Grapes are sore
that F-35
@@leogazebo5290 Fair point. We don't know the capabilities of the CAF. It's a wise strategist who assumes that its potential is meaningful.
Btw Asiatimes (okay, it's Asiatimes) reported that the CAF has a radar that can track stealth aircraft.
@@ShabirMian-l1d Wrong grapes.
It's not a prototype anymore... pakistan has already sent pilots to train on it because they're buying some
J35 is 2.2 Mach, F35 is 1.8 Mach. J35 radar detection range 250 km, F35 200 km. Radar reflection J35 is 25 times smaller than F35. Go figure the rest.
J35 looks somewhat similar to F35. However, F35 is too heavy, too fat, too slow, combat radius too short, weapon bay too little, air to air missile range too short, fuel tank is too little, no super cruise capability, not to mention engines failures too often. Chinese J35 help US corrects all these problems and it beats F35 in every way.
F22 also can hardly be upgraded to adopt latest technology. Meanwhile J-20 have lots of upgrade potential. Its latest version J-20B is considerably more capable than its first version. Unlike F-22 China has been continuously chucking out J-20B,J-20S… It’s already at the north of 300. By mid 2025 it will be twice as many J-20 as F-22.
Not to mention the latest electronic warfare version of the J-20S is used for the drone host, because the J-20S has 2 seats, one person controls the aircraft and the other controls the drone swarm. In the future, one J-20S will lead a swarm of 20 CASC Rainbow drones to fight. How do F22 and F35 attack J-20S and J-35?
The U.S. is responsible for fantasy and making PPT, and China is responsible for realizing fantasy. This is the current situation.
They managed to catch up to a 35 year old plane and nearly 20 year old plane. Congratulations China! You're now only 20 years behind.
i have never seen such a stupid comment, my mind is absolutely blown. we dont know basically ANYTHING about the latest chinese fighters, you are only speculating, chinese tech in aviation is less than american's considering that the new j35 still has a hud
Bro you gotta deal with all the chinese shills in the comments
Chines spying stealing and copying is outstanding. However, it still doesn't come close to the F-22 and F-35 in real world use.
The reason the J-35 has two engines is because of two reasons: 1. The engines are not that reliable coz the ChiComs can't make advanced turbine engine blades. 2. A single WS-13 engine does not provide enough power, so two are needed.
Compared to F-35, J-20 is already found to be a less stealthy aircraft according to a 3rd party CAD study done on Aircraft 101. So will J-35 be any different? More likely not but only time will tell.
3:30 Hey man can I copy you're homework ( hacks in and steals it )
J35 looks somewhat similar to F35; however, F35 is too heavy, too fat, too slow; combat radius too short, weapon bay too little, air to air missile range too short, fuel tank is too little; no super cruise capability, not as stealthy; not to mention engines failures too often. Chinese J35 help US corrects all these problems and it beats F35 in every way.😎
@@kinwaisiu9414 finaly one person who is not influenced by american propaganda
Please don't compare outdated, low-tech F35 to J35; totally different level.
@@kinwaisiu9414 the F35 walked so the J35 could run lol
@@keshanwaidyanayake2056 今天，F35坐在地段享受雨天和日光浴，明天將成為博物館的裝飾品🤭
Typhoon is better than Raffle also more European countries use the Typhoon.
The J-35 looks just like the F-35💀
如果你只谈论外观，不管是体型还是双发动机，应该说比F22更像才合适吧？ F35?什么鬼？单发动机，体型肥硕，都比J35相差较远😂
i thought knockoffs are always worse than the original.... but J35 looks much better
no son we have an f-35 at home
why are their F35 slimmer and sexier than ours...
@@ZETA14.88 it's not the knock-off, it's the upgrade.
@@ZETA14.88 No vertical take-off. And the A and C models use the same frame, which is why they are also chonkeh. But design-wise, the J35 looks pretty sick ngl
@@ZETA14.88bro their f35 temu looks like it's starving
@@darkzealot88Bruce Lee isn't exactly a starved version of Jack Black you know.
No. Despite what the title may say, the jet is not invisible whatsoever.
No DAS either with a 80s style hud panel. lol
Anyone who says it's a copy of the F-35 is delusional.
IQ76 only can yelling copy copy copy copy 🐄🐮😝😛😁🃏.
You're right, it's actually a copy of the SU-57, F-22, AND the F-35!
@@bennettsorrells5494 What you just said is beyond delusional...........its laughable to anyone with even the basic ABC know how of aeronautics.
I agree. Completely different internals... two-engine design...
But still, they called it the J-35? 35? Seriously?
Their naval flakers are called J-15 the land version is J-11, so J-35 from the FC-31 makes sense
Um even at 100-120 a year for ten years… is enough time for the US to finish development and start production on its next aircraft.
Its literally that one friend asked to copy his friend's homework. (But they're not actually friends)
Literally the F22 double engine on an F-35. But, you know, worse than the two
Except that they aren't friends
@@RejectedDiskI was going to say that! More like a bully, looking over your shoulder….
@@LastGoatKnight. Reports say the J35 is faster, and has a higher service ceiling than the F35. But this is a trick the Russians (Then Soviets) played on us once. I forget which plane (Though I remember it was a “Twin-tail, twin-engined” aircraft. The thing was supposed to be unbelievably fast…. Then it was caught on radar going an absolutely crazy speed (Can’t remember that either, but it was a lot faster than any interceptor, or multi role fighter in U.S. inventory.). We came to find out, later, that the Soviets had purposely let the U.S. catch it on radar, so we would be worried about how fast it was. A while later, we managed to get a hold of one of those planes…. Come to find out; The plane could go that fast, but only for a very short time, and within a few minutes, the engines were damaged beyond repair!!! So the Soviets trashed two of their newest and most technologically advanced engines, just to scare the U.S.! Worth it? Gorbachev thought so!
@@LastGoatKnight the 3 indicates 3 engine and the 5 indicates Fifth Generation in J-35 by the way
Well, although I am Chinese, I still have to say something bad about CPC. In fact, most of the Chinese variants of SU27/30 are not manufactured under license. Only the first small batch is like this. The agreement also stipulates that key components must be imported from Russia. Later, China secretly produced a lot of parts and then mass-produced J16s beyond the authorized quantity. Russia was very angry about this. As a compromise, China promised not to promote the Chinese variants to the international market. Obviously, J16 is more competitive than SU30.
Lockheed Martin: "Stop stealin' my fuckin' designs and make your own!!!"
erm actually its not copying 2 engine vs 1 is a giant design defference and yes it copies some designs because it helps improve the performace and america does same to if u see ur enemy using a new amazing thing, u would also want to copy the amazing thing so ur listening to AMERCAN PROPAGANDA
Trolls see the same appearance and think they are copied or stolen. Have trolls been brainwashed into idiots by the media? 😂
We know that this kind of aircraft is a top-notch industrial design. If you think it is stolen just because of its similar appearance, wouldn’t it mean that all developed countries in the world can copy the shell and then declare to have fifth-generation fighters? brother! Don't ignore the efforts of the Chinese people, they are far beyond your imagination!
People that keeps on saying ‘copy’ is so goofy is crazy
Why even make a video about a jet with basically no information available
the swedish offically predicted the j35 name over 50 years prior
The Drakken having to share a name with this is the biggest of insults.
Slimmer, shredded & looks way healthier.
The J35 is in service with the PLAAF, not just a prototype on display.