Siskel & Ebert Classics 4/19/91 - Out For Justice, Mortal Thoughts

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 тра 2021
  • Plus IMPROMPTU and JOURNEY OF HOPE in this April 1991 episode. As a reminder, if you're looking for the latest home video reviews -- from Blu-Rays of classic catalog titles to the latest releases -- be sure to check out my own review site at www.andyfilm.com
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 138

  • @scottcole6093
    @scottcole6093 3 роки тому +8

    The way Gene whispers “Frederic Chopin” at 2:49 made me lol

  • @davidnelson6874
    @davidnelson6874 Рік тому +2

    I love David Lean’s 1946 version of Great Expectations. I saw it way back in high school in the Seventies. It holds up very, very well.

  • @citygirl5705
    @citygirl5705 3 роки тому +5

    Great review by both of them on "Out for Justice." Although Siskel is right. It is a thumbs up.

  • @filmbuff2777
    @filmbuff2777 3 роки тому +8

    I liked the tribute segment on David Lean.

  • @TheNameisPlissken1981
    @TheNameisPlissken1981 3 роки тому +9

    I remember my friends and I going to see both Mortal Thoughts & Out For Justice in the theater. I was 17 and Mortal Thoughts was the first film directed by Alan Rudolph that I actually liked as for Out For Justice, I thought it was Steven's best film. I haven't seen either one, all the way through, since!

  • @tonymontana4284
    @tonymontana4284 5 місяців тому +2

    Out for Justice should have won an Oscar.

  • @BishopWalters12
    @BishopWalters12 8 місяців тому +1

    LOL, Out for Justice is awesome and Mortal Thoughts is an underrated gem.

  • @gaba-goo3733
    @gaba-goo3733 Рік тому +2

    Out for justice hits some Scarface notes with Will Forsythe !!

  • @mjanderson4
    @mjanderson4 2 роки тому +3

    Loved the David Lean tribute, he was one of the all-time greats. Not sure how Gene liked Out for Justice when he would often give a thumbs down to a film because of it's violence; Taxi Driver being one example.

  • @reneedennis2011
    @reneedennis2011 3 роки тому +8

    R.I.P. Glenn Headley.

    • @MrBoyYankee
      @MrBoyYankee 3 роки тому +2

      Underrated gem of a woman.

    • @reneedennis2011
      @reneedennis2011 3 роки тому

      @@MrBoyYankee Yup.

    • @steveprice2718
      @steveprice2718 3 роки тому +1

      Very overlooked actress. She , too me, was always spot on.

    • @sahej6939
      @sahej6939 Рік тому

      She’s amazing in this and everything else!

    • @sahej6939
      @sahej6939 Рік тому

      @@steveprice2718 seamless

  • @lothargrimm9853
    @lothargrimm9853 3 роки тому +10

    Out For Justice is Seagal's best movie.

    • @FruityGangster
      @FruityGangster 3 роки тому +1

      I’d say Under Siege

    • @Jbaxter85
      @Jbaxter85 3 роки тому +2

      I like above the law, under seige 1&2 & Marked for death but not out for justice.

    • @FruityGangster
      @FruityGangster 3 роки тому +1

      @@Jbaxter85 Out for Justice was lame in regards to how difficult Richie (William Forsythe) was to find lol. At one point, Seagal takes the time to ask about 15 guys at a bar where Richie is. And then proceeds to kick all of their asses. “Anybody seen Richieeee???”.

    • @lothargrimm9853
      @lothargrimm9853 3 роки тому

      @@Jbaxter85 Above the Law and Maked For Dead are alright. I never dug either Under Siege. For my money Out For Justice is his most entertaining movie.

    • @hakc97again
      @hakc97again 2 роки тому

      Nico

  • @sleuthentertainment5872
    @sleuthentertainment5872 6 місяців тому +1

    I think Out for Justice, despite all the bad things Seagal did while shooting, is one of the best 90s action thrillers

  • @rarantsnow7938
    @rarantsnow7938 11 місяців тому +1

    My dad hated Out for Justice just as much as Roger Ebert did. They had the same taste in movies.

  • @kevint1719
    @kevint1719 2 роки тому +4

    I think Siskel calls Out For Justice dead right. It's a fantastic piece of entertainment, the best thing Seagal ever did, and up there with Road House, Hard Target and The Last Boy Scout in the pantheon of great funny/violent action films.

    • @kevinfinnerty8414
      @kevinfinnerty8414 Рік тому +2

      Never understood the hate for Seagal. I prefer a fraud who makes Good action movies. Than someone legitimate who makes shit movies. Seagal has a much better catalog of movies. (Especially his first 5 films) than Van Damm, Norris or even Bruce Lee.

    • @ricardocantoral7672
      @ricardocantoral7672 8 місяців тому

      ​@@kevinfinnerty8414 I never liked him because he strikes me has a huge narcissist. He's basically the Gene Simmons of action movies.

  • @mst3k3000
    @mst3k3000 3 роки тому +3

    I'm actually surprised that there was one promotional consideration at the end of the show since they mostly have 3 or 4 of them. I wonder if there was a show where they didn't have any promotional considerations at all and just cut to the end credits.

  • @reneperez7903
    @reneperez7903 3 роки тому +8

    Can’t believe Gene liked Out for Justice just cuz of Steven Seagal. I liked the violence but a lot of the scenes went way over the top.

    • @Jbaxter85
      @Jbaxter85 3 роки тому

      I agree

    • @matthewschwartz6607
      @matthewschwartz6607 Рік тому

      Did they review Marked For Death or Hard To Kill?

    • @reneperez7903
      @reneperez7903 Рік тому

      @@matthewschwartz6607 hard to kill yes, both gave it thumbs 👎 Roger hated the one too many chase scenes & Gene didn’t like Kelly LeBrock he admitted she wasn’t ready to play at the level of being in an action film.

  • @Smeatbass
    @Smeatbass 2 місяці тому

    I am convinced that "Out for Justice" was secretly a guilty pleasure for Roger, but wanted to be professional and not just go with how ridiculous it is 😂

    • @ganglabesh
      @ganglabesh 2 місяці тому

      he thumbed up under siege part 2, so i don't think this is true.

  • @rarantsnow7938
    @rarantsnow7938 11 місяців тому

    Robert Ebert was a savage when it came to movies that he didn’t like. 😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @pablosilva6988
    @pablosilva6988 9 місяців тому

  • @drumtum
    @drumtum 11 місяців тому

    Out for justice was and is entertaining. Not great, but some action fun. I am amazed that Gene liked it. Out for justice, Above the law and Under siege are the movies to go to of Seagal.

  • @sahej6939
    @sahej6939 Рік тому

    I love Mortal Thoughts! Only decent thing about Out fir Justice is the tiny Pam Grier role!

    • @YouTube-tied
      @YouTube-tied Рік тому

      Mortal Thoughts sucked and the fuck was Pam Grier in Out For Justice?

    • @caza728
      @caza728 7 місяців тому

      Pam Grier was in Above the Law.

  • @Jbaxter85
    @Jbaxter85 Рік тому

    My review
    Moral Thoughts 👍🌟🌟🌟
    Impromptu 👍🌟🌟🌟
    Out For Justice 👎🌟🌟
    Journey of Hope 👍🌟🌟🌟

  • @Jamal3.87
    @Jamal3.87 3 роки тому +7

    I have been wanting to see the Out for Justice review. I read somewhere the directions of their thumbs and was wondering why Gene voted Thumbs Up. Hearing now his arguments, he only liked Seagal. I’m with Roger. The fight scenes are routine and choreographed, the plot is piecemeal, Seagal’s Brooklyn accent is wanting at best, and Roger’s point about it taking Seagal all day to find Richie is a good one. Richie kills people in broad daylight, and walks and drives freely around Brooklyn and is never caught. Give me a break. Roger left out the part where Seagal arrests Richie’s sister for no apparent reason. Also the mafia subplot is awful. There is another plot involving his estrangement from his wife and all he does is tell her a story from his childhood that yields an unearned reconciliation, as if we care and we don’t. And payoff gag to all this is a groin kick to a guy who throws a puppy out of a car window in a garbage bag earlier in the film. 👎🏾 1.5/4

    • @toymanreturns546
      @toymanreturns546 3 роки тому +3

      I couldn't agree with you more on your critique. Out for Justice is easily one of the worst films of 1991. Reason being for the film was its incomprehensible screenplay by David Lee Henry; he seems to underline the crimes in Brooklyn like as if every cop are on strike for whatever situation they're in with their local precinct. It fails even more that the Mafia sub-plot had absolutely nothing to do with the fact Bobby Lupo was gunned down in broad daylight, in front of his terrified family; I think the Mafia were as soft-minded as socially rejected school nerds.
      And talk about the fight choreography, it looked very uninteresting to watch. Watching every violent scene becomes lethargic to sit through, like nothing brutal is going to happen. Even if the uncut NC-17 version contained more violence, it wouldn't make a difference at all. It's one of those films that postulates crime can be solved through a one man army, when the police already got Richie dead on their sights, whereas Gino was functionally inept on hunting him down with excessive force. I give Out for Justice 1/2 a star out of 4. 👎

    • @Jamal3.87
      @Jamal3.87 3 роки тому +2

      @@toymanreturns546 It makes me wonder if Gino was put on administrative leave pending an Internal Affairs investigation. That’s another issue I had. Gino is not a likable character at all. All the damage he does tells me he wasn’t interested in avenging his partner’s murder, he was using his badge as a prop, an excuse to pillage with no questions asked

    • @toymanreturns546
      @toymanreturns546 3 роки тому +2

      That's right, Gino had a tendency to vent his frustration because Brooklyn is rippled with crime on a daily and nightly basis. He literally tries his best to clean out the trash, with hilarious results. Knowing he had nothing to lose when he's likely to be sacked from the police force, all Gino could do is yell, knock out and shoot anyone who in some part, they have no connection to Ritchie whatsoever. And you talk about the sub-plot where some right-wing religious zealot who put a dog in a garbage bag and is left to die, I say that was gratuitous at best. Why on Earth would that be added to the script? And how could anyone ever take light into that out of context scenario, for audiences to be entertained by that? It appears the screenwriter was mentally bankrupt of one action scene to another, so that attempted suffocation of the dog could mean something useful to audiences.

    • @Jamal3.87
      @Jamal3.87 3 роки тому +2

      @@toymanreturns546 and didn’t it seem like the film was choppy in terms of the plot developments? When the movie airs on basic cable there is an additional scene with Bobby’s wife and Gino’s wife at Bobby’s wife’s home of them talking. Suddenly Richie breaks in and comes this close to killing them. That is never followed up on

    • @toymanreturns546
      @toymanreturns546 3 роки тому +1

      I've not seen anything as stupid as Gino and his wife running from Ritchie's cohorts to shoot them down, so the investigation over Bobby's death could come to a grinding halt. You would think that someone with half a brain in the film would've used a silencer to shoot them both in the head, but leaving the child unharmed but traumatised over the deaths of Gino and his wife - then the stupidity of Gino's behavior as a cop would finally come to an end. Heck, Ritchie would be celebrating without interruption from the NYPD, before potentially progressing from a local drug kingpin, to a feared kingpin who could make international deals in Colombia, Cuba and possibly Vietnam in terms of drugs and weaponry. If that was the case in various re-writes to satisfy the studio hierarchy, then three-quarters of the NYPD would turn on the law enforcement in order to favor the rising star of international drug trading. But somehow Ritchie's men were so dismally executed as potential killers of Gino, none of them knew the trajectory of shooting the target. Even the last man standing in Gino's apartment was doomed to fail from the first frame of the shooting sequence.

  • @parapoliticos52
    @parapoliticos52 2 роки тому +1

    the times that seagal was an a lister

  • @MrBoyYankee
    @MrBoyYankee 3 роки тому

    Richie where the hell Richie RICHIEEEEEEE!!!!

  • @jaymike3302
    @jaymike3302 2 місяці тому

    Anybody seen Richie?

  • @kevinfinnerty8414
    @kevinfinnerty8414 Рік тому

    Gene was way ahead of the time with his Steven Seagal review. Doesn’t like his interviews or real life persona. But his movies are entertaining as hell.

  • @jamesmitchell8922
    @jamesmitchell8922 2 роки тому

    Where's the moment of the picture?

  • @terrygyimah1956
    @terrygyimah1956 3 роки тому +2

    Mortal Thoughts (two thumbs up)
    Impromptu (two thumbs up)
    Out for Justice (two thumbs up)
    Journey of Hope (two thumbs up)

    • @steveprice2718
      @steveprice2718 3 роки тому +2

      Out for justice (Siskel thumb up, Ebert THUMB DOWN), I was shocked at Siskel on that one

  • @gspendlove
    @gspendlove 3 роки тому +2

    I used to like Steven Seagal, and defended him right here in this forum. But that was before he became a Russian stooge.

    • @sahej6939
      @sahej6939 Рік тому

      It took you that long?

    • @gspendlove
      @gspendlove Рік тому

      @@sahej6939 No, I stopped liking him _long_ before he started cozying up to dictators like Putin and Lukashenko.

  • @NovaFeedback1979
    @NovaFeedback1979 2 роки тому

    Weird take by Gene Siskel here. He previously gave Above the Law and Hard to Kill thumbs down. Now he all of a sudden likes Segal's movies. OK.

  • @Swoll826
    @Swoll826 3 роки тому

    Did William Forsythe put on weight for that role or was he just fat at that time? I don't recall him looking that chubby in his other films over his career