emarskineel how is he phony lol. His an astrophysicist with many doctorates and has massive credibility in the science community. Your just one of those jealous types lol
Going through the visualisation of dimensions in terms of what you would see is interesting... i’ve done some potent drugs in my life, and i still cant even guess what the 4th dimension would be like.
You know what I love about this guy? He’s perfectly aware of his own personality and how it affects others but his so confident about what he’s saying he doesn’t feel the need to subscribe to normal social etiquette. He realizes that while everyone is entitled to their own opinion, they aren’t all created equal.
@@Worldwidegoat5 figured that was self apparent. joe is your "every guy". people like him because he's about as average as average gets. i may not agree with everything he says, but neil has dedicated his life to the pursuit of knowledge regarding a finite subject. his opinion on things related to it will inevitably be superior to others
@@Delta0001-y Wrapped around in a spiral on a 2-D surface using the electro-magnetic force of a 3-D universe that is entangled with the 4th dimension on a quantum scale.
Neil speaks on extremely simple things and tries to make it sound so profound. Joe: Why aren’t Koala’s bears? Neil: They’re Marsupials. Not bears. Appreciate marsupials for what they are. They carry their young in a pouch. It’s such an amazing aspect of nature, of course they’re not bears. Joe: Because they don’t meet the Koalafications
Flying cars just sound cool and something out of a science fiction movie. Flying cars are called helicopters, in reality. Neil has an interesting and a wise perspective on things. That’s why I admire him greatly.
Clint Eastwood has a pilot's license to fly a helicopter The traffic was that bad Los Angeles in the 1970s that's how he got from his house on the hills to Paramount studios
flying cars are not science fiction in fact they showed one that already exists, the truth is not at all wise in fact there he showed how little he knows about physics by trying to evade the subject
@@diegoalejandro8362 You just want something looking like a car that flies well you have helicopter which flies it basically doesn't look like a car that's it. Neil definitely is correct i agree upon him completely.
@@johnpeter2609 no, a helicopter is not made to function like a car, it is super noisy, it is made for military purposes, to transport very large loads, not at all similar to a private car
Fr man wtf lol imagine people in the 15 hundres probly thought me and you litterally speaking you and i (dont know your name) were guna be looking like the jetsons but in reality how much has really changed? What the craziest thing right now? An iphone wow a lil device with everything in it somthing that was eventually guna be made
@@Bass1ne the crazy thing that happened is called "internet" the fact that I'm typing this and you can read it instantly as I posted it is waay useful than freaking flying cars, side not we are probably on two different continents, this would have blow their minds back in the 60's!
It's more like Neil: hey Elon I'm giving some publicity for your tunnel products Joe: it's sounds like someone is selling PR in my podcast Elon: this is awesome, my products are not profitable, but enough speculations will make my stocks go up Idiots: yeah smoking weed, play video games, masterbate, and buy Bitcoin is smart move
@@jayjawad3598 Smoking weed, playing video games, and masturbating doesn't make you an idiot. (You spelled masturbating wrong but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just say it was a typo) The only thing that really makes you an idiot is buying Bitcoin in my opinion.
This is how you're supposed to teach/learn. Don't just answer the question, but target the root of that question to fully break down and analyze what you're asking. Only then can you become fully aware of the question's entirety.
Agreed, but some people don't even a fraction of the mental capacity or attention span that it takes to withstand what it means to truly means to ponder and question these questions
That last part, that's where you're mistaken. It's needed because Joe "Whoaaaaaa airplanes make noise" Rogan is high as fuck. This is, ironically, the highest he's ever been on the podcast.
I've been in 4 car accidents in my life (none of them serious). Imagine an accident in the sky. How many people survive plane and helicopter crashes? Exactly.
How many people die of plane crashes compared to car crashes each year? Exactly, but we live with it. If instead of an attachment to your car we made self flying drones, in the end the deaths may be far lower than cars. Also, each seat fitted with a parachute may be as effective as a seat belt or airbag. Not 100 percent but better than nothing.
@@Bejaardenbus This is exactly why I hate him. He interrupts at the most important points, to add nothing useful. It's like talking to a child with ADD.
This is only one of two times that someone has said something that made me remember something that seems surreal that I had forgotten about; that is, planes being so loud that you couldn't have a conversation when one flow over. I remember the teacher would have to stop talking when a plane flew over. I forgot all about that. The only other time was when a little kid said to me, "I forgot how to fly in my dreams when I turned 4" I don't remember what we were talking about at that time.
@@HuyNgo-yi4nd nothing like that. He is just trying to make people see that the concepts of physics (4th dimensions and stuff like that) are not farfetched and have real-world practical applications...
I think it's all that Joe can do not to lunch across the table and choke this guy. Just kidding that's the Joe of 20 years ago today's Joe is a lot cooler than that.
Joe listing all the downsides of subway transportation and never mentioning that a base annual pass isn't going to cost 100k or more right off the bat.
But as soon as flying cars became popular, they would be restricted to certain airspace, and there would be traffic too. Unless its something most people can't get their hands on, eventually it will be congested.
They'd probably require some sort of system where flying cars would detect others in the vicinity, share their flight path with each other and make a decision that alters one or both cars courses to avoid collision. Then if you're in manual mode the car's computer would probably just take over control if you were getting too close to someone and there was a chance of a collision.
@@KJ110813 yeah but the problem is congestion. Even if its super safe and reliable and affordable, everyone wants a piece of it, causing a lot of traffic and not much of a solution to avoiding traffic
@@yourfavoriteclaymationpeng2926 One huge thing that would contribute to less congestion would be the fact that there would be overall a very significant decreases in the distances traveled by commuters, due to the ability of people to take much more direct routes to their destinations than is possible with a road system. Roads and freeways are designed based on the distribution of the population, the frequency with which they travel to various places, and the projected trends of that activity in the near future. With flying cars, congestion could be dealt with much easier as trends changed with little need for changes in infrastructure.
If it ever turned into a thing, I don't think they will let them be designed fly too high from the ground. And probably wouldn't be allowed to fly more than a few feet in major cities if at all.
As long as they were at an altitude lower than commercial air traffic, I don't see why it would be a problem to fly at altitudes significantly above the ground and above buildings. The only problem that could arise would be if a flying car were to malfunction and could no longer maintain flight. That could be solved (or the damage at least minimized) by designing parachutes durable and large enough to significantly slow the vehicle before it makes impact with the ground or buildings.
A flying car is essentially what a helicopter is no matter which way you look at it. That is the point Neil is making, and he is saying that the tunnel and bridge system allows for that 3rd dimensional travel that you can obtain WITHOUT the need of something that can fly. So unless you want to pilot a "flying car", stick to the road or increase your IQ so you can become a pilot and not make dumb comments like this lol
@@Kataklysm1234 he didn't advocate personal helicoptors, which would have made actual sense to the conversation. You don't have to restate his position about tunnels and bridges, trying to look smart by showing how you got it and pretending it makes him look smart. It's one of the stupidest things he's ever said and you look dumb for defending it, while attempting to look smart because you "got the 3 dimensional part!" Omg, the more I attempt to explain how stupid you AND him sound, the more I am thinking we need to do away with public schools like yesterday.
@@austinhopkins4191 flying car is not a plane. Plane and cars have to rely on different mechanics to fly. Otherwise I don't see difference why should even it called a car. When planes fail they can still fly and land because they have wings and they also have high altitude and speed. Planes don't maneuver much. They fly in straight lines. Also flying cars are would be essential for large cities, for fast traveling in crowded places....Nobody in city rush time has time for gaining kilometers of altitudes before going straight towards to destination. It should be something "mass produce'able" and something that people can easily fit it to their garage.
Niel: “We already have flying cars. They’re called helicopters...” Joe: “Well, helicopters were originally invented for that...” Niel: “They’re called HELICOPTERS”
There won't be a flying cars!!! What is a car any way, it is something that you drive... so if one need to drive on the ground then you have a vehicle, you want to drive in the air, well afford a helicopter, or anything that can fly...
It would be chaos. there'd be no designated roads. Drunk drivers and dummies would turn into missiles. The infrastructure to monitor and regulate the traffic would be immense. And it'd be noisy.
The difference between tunnels/bridges and flying cars is huge. The great part of flying cars would be the lack of required infrastructure. With a tunnel sure I can get around the person above me but only where there are tunnel entrances. With a flying car to get around you I could go up down left right and a combination of any of those 4.
Use your brain. Firsty, everyone who needs to drive a flying car would need to have crazy qualifications, look how hard flying a plane is. If a car fails, it stops. If a flying car fails, it crashes and you die, and it might even crash into a building. And if it falls, not only will you die, the people around the crash will die to, because it will just explode. You'd have to train people to rear coordinates, deal with turbulence, most people would just give up trying to fly it. "You can fly up, left, right." That would take an awful lot of fuel, only rich people would be able to have it. It will also make way too much noise, just as Tyson says drones are so loud you can't have conversations. Imagine cars flying everywhere, the noise pollution would be off the charts. Also, you would definitely need infrastructure, otherwise cars would be crashing left and right. Please tell me how you can have millions of cars flying the air with no infastructure. How do you even figure out routes in the air, it's so hard that each driver would need to have a background in engineering. You won't even be able to use it whenever the weather goes berserk
@vol94 I know this was a year ago. But some of what you are saying that is essentially dumb, is possible. Noise? Electric propulsion with fan blade design could get noise to acceptable levels. Be able to operate it? Not a problem. Flying really isn't that hard, but these flying vehicles will be highly automated. A monkey will be able to operate it. Commercial planes essentially can be practically flow by a novice now. Crashing into things and safety? It would be regulated. Such vehicle would have to have proven safety measures in case of failures or sufficient backups. Really no different than air planes but one would not need and airport or a pilots license. Probably have its own category of licensing less strict as pilots licenses. I can see driving it to a neighborhood launch point and taking off. How to navigate? Again most of that will be automated into onboard navigation. There likely be a government system to establish air routes and to maintain clearance to others. Will it be expensive? Probably. We probably should stop calling them flying cars. They will be hybrid air vehicles (HAV). The ground portion would not be far distance. It's going to be like an EV but with ability to to to hover and fly. Advantage, higher travel speed and more flexibility in path and likely more direct path.
Your theory works if you’re the only one flying a car. Otherwise you can’t go up and down as you wish since there are other cars that would be occupying that lane.
@@FetsumBerhaneDire I guess it would depend on the location. La or NYC traffic would probably be to congested to simply go around. In 99% of the world you wouldn't even have to worry if people spread out over 1000 ft.
Talk about useless.. I once pondered on the idea of starting a caption service for UA-cam or UA-camrs channels like podcasts and such. Well I was disappointed when I learned that they already have that option, but was even more disappointed when I seen just how much of a piece of shit it is
When Neil says “Just watch” you know he’s about to come up with a brilliant example and explanation to help the other person better understand what he’s talking about. I love it.
That's crazy man. Crazy world we live in. Have you ever tried DMT ? There are people, native tribe of Amazon , who sucks the dicks of young possums to get high with DMT
"Consider that if you were in a self driving car and it wants to change lanes, it communicates that to the other cars." We've been doing that since 1909, they're called indicators.
Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooppppppppppppppppppppppppoppppp ooooo o ii iiip Lo j I like you king 🤴 love you all io lI’ll I hope you have fun 🤩 on the day of ppl on ithe I out to the king ill be where at kpof 🏊♂️ king of the lord and the lord bless lord of grace grace and blessings to you and lord lord of grace grace and grace grace for grace grace and grace grace for grace grace and grace grace for
He's also ignoring half of what Neil says, he's dishing it as good as he's getting but he's trying to make it fun to watch for less curious viewers too
I guess it depends on what you call a "car". People have already scaled up drone parts and put a seat on it, and can fly around on them. Only wouldn't work in cities.
Damn I genuinely feel for you people in countries I've barely heard of and know nothing about :/ meanwhile you people know more about Donald Trump than I do. MERICA
Can we clone Neil and have him be a permanent guest on the show? Anytime someone says something stupid he would correct them and educate us in such an entertaining way.
neil would just shill talking points for the most part. I love how his future fantasy is self driving cars at 120MPH...OHHH WOW, stop every human from physically driving so the future of travel can be cars still at 120mph on the ground...dumb fuck
The sound created from air hitting a man made object traveling at highway speed is the most underrated sound ever. With no muffler my 74 charger engine sounds like a purr over the wind at 120mph, its crazy how loud air is
paramotors, jetpacks, helicopters, hot air balloons, airplanes, etc...they all are effective at travelling because they don't have to navigate around obstacles at ground level like cars do. You can save much more time if you fly over an obstacle instead of going around it neil is way off on this topic
@@GrowingDownUnder in a vacuum yes, but it's an absolute logistical HELL on earth if everyone was doing it. Do you realize how many people would fucking die every single day? We can't drive cars as it is.
If you had automated cars you wouldn't need lanes, just one giant lane on the 405 with vehicles weaving in and out going fast since they'd all be communicating with each other.
@@exposurebuilds2100 Why do people think that if there were flying cars there would be no traffic , airplanes have to face traffic and they are much less in numbers . It's not practical enough.
pranshul aggarwal if there were an extra way of transportation such as that we’d have about three ways also mind you airplanes would be higher up above then all the flying cars or that would be very idiotic now look back to your point you said there would be traffic still, I never said anything about there not being traffic but I can assure you there would be less traffic because not only would we have on ground and underground transportation, but we’d also have a third option but knowing the humans on this planet that can’t drive correctly on ground what shows they’ll know above ground. I don’t want car parts falling from the sky 😂
@@EdSuavePerez He's a genius, I've never denied that. But he often interrupts people that just want to speak their mind, or even when they're asking a question to him. He probably doesn't need to listen, but he should, just to show some respect and kindness.
@@Albanez39 In that aspect, then yes i do respect your opinion, and i'd have to agree. Ive have seen where NDT in some cases interrupts the speaker, and i think that just maybe because of his passion for the field, or it can also mean a lack of communication skills in a very small area which can be fixed if someone brings up the matter. It can be a little annoying because sometimes interrupting someone can leave you out on information, but on Tyson's end like you said, listening does show respect and kindness, even if you don't realize it.
Great Video! Neil if you would have been one of my teachers in high school I would have gone in a totally different direction in life! You are an amazing man Mr. Tyson!
@@Kyoto_150 Far from it. I own 2 business. I've done blue collar labor for 30 years. Thru school preaching hard work and hard labor is how u make a living. Neil would have opened my mind to endless directions of wonderful opportunities. 🙂
He's a self absorbed narcissistic know it all full of hubris that doesn't know it all. The stupidest thing he said was about the planes landing gear making all that noise on landing. It's the air brakes and flaps.
J.M.$ A for an thought to be considered a theory in science, there must be a lot of evidence that already proves it right then wrong. So you’re way better of believing a well approved. And them not telling the truth is literally the opposite of their job. Their job is to discover something new, or improve some information. Anyway what exactly do you mean on what they aren’t saying the truth.
Theres a thing called a flying car, it's called a plane or a helicopter but not everybody is allowed to buy one and fly everywhere obviously. We need laws to protect us against ourselves. The barrier between the flying car and the average Joe is laws, not tech.
Well, not just that. By virtue of being on the ground you have better control on the ground. Anything in the air has a whole host of control issues that make them more of a nuisance to operate than a land vehicle. It's not just a matter of law, but also a matter of market forces and convenience.
We can still opt out of AI unless it completely enslaves or destroys us, and if that happens it's beyond our control anyway so who cares? The only way it's going to change my life is if it completely takes over the world or is forced upon me for some reason. And if that happens there's nothing I can do about it really.
A few months back me and my mate were baked and looked up at a helicopter and said that they are basically flying cars, now I've just found this video and now I'm convinced Neil smokes
@@georgedepalma429 Yeah but guess what? There is a thing called a "dock" where you can put your boat, then you can WALK to the stores using your legs! Yeah! And then buy what you want and go back into your boat. Easy. I know walking to stores is pretty insane from an American perspective, but try it sometime.
@@LetsGoGetThem Ok waterworld, again, most of the population still live on land. After you dock, how safe would you feel walking with your soy frappuccino if cars had a free for all like boats. Or worrying about a flying car crash into an apartment building cause they also had a free for all. You got me? If not, best get back on your boat then.
And most of the population living by water is either aware of boats and/or use them. Who is saying that there would be a free for all? There really isn't for boats (www.hmy.com/rules-of-the-waterways-for-boating-and-yachting), and despite cars having rules I am WAAAYYY more concerned about idiots crashing into me driving their cars than I am at sea, despite there being a free for all for boats (there isn't). I would know since my family owned a boat growing up with a boat spot too which I went to pretty much every summer, cruising around the area. Where I live a lot of people ride their boats during the summer and dock elsewhere to eat or visit. I was mainly opposed to your comment suggesting nobody uses a boat to travel to and from stores. They most definitely do. Also, you're calling me waterworld? I guess if your logic being that you can't possibly go to a store from a boat unless it "floats on water" then it makes sense you would consider anyone using a boat as "waterworld", lol. Really not that crazy, bud. Also epic soy joke, yeah, because correcting you on how people use boats mean I must be a SOY BOY.
My grade six science project was a magnetic floating car. But it required electromagnets one the car and the road to be laid out with magnets with different strength in oncoming traffic thus eliminating head on collisions. I’m aware it’s flawed; I was 11 haha
To: Elegant Sweetie, seems more like Niel is ignoring the question and Joe is giving him an opportunity at not making himself look an argumentative know-it-all with no point. He didn't answer the question, he just evaded it by selling "3 dimensional highways" lol.
shechshire he answered quite well, yeah it was weird how he answered it but it was still answered it just took longer as Neil beats around the bush but it doesn’t mean he doesn’t have a point. He basically told him there wasn’t really a need for flying cars yet. He might seem like a know it all but that’s just misunderstanding a man who’s just trying for others to understand why he thinks otherwise
The answer to... "Why don't we have flying cars?"
You can't trust human idiots in the air.
James Dooling, especially flat Earthers
I think they would be self flying if we ever get to that point.
Can barely trust idiots on the ground
@Kaen what's wrong with saying "praised be God"? Or is it just because they speak Arabic?
Kevin Lopez It’s because that say that before they explode or doing something to hurt others
Joe high af, “it’s like a boat, but for the air” lmao
Is he wrong?
Yes he is. Boats go in two dimensions. Submarines, but for the air.
@@trigger7372 submarine but for the air would be a zeppelin wouldn't it?
Flak Jacket well I’ve heard a couple times that air is like a liquid so it makes sense
I was in stitches 😂😂
People still don’t know how to drive cars on the ground.
Fun
Fun
Fun
Chris Jensen people are stupid! Flying cars should be standard.
@@m.washington6702 cococococombo breaker!
Neil : Flying cars are noisy
Aliens : Ours aren't
they know 4th dimentions
They have advanced knowledge
You meant Elon.
@@Ethereal_Mist elon is too busy embarking on social media trustbusting projects to invent more convenient helicopters
@@jayjoeie alien aren't real
Neil absolutely SHOOOOOK that people have nothing better to do than watch Joe for 3 hours 😂
He's phony as hell
Neil is only smart if he is talking about something you have no clue about. maybe he just went to work drunk
Hahahahaha
emarskineel how is he phony lol. His an astrophysicist with many doctorates and has massive credibility in the science community. Your just one of those jealous types lol
@@jusbertmeza4424 his explanation why housing is closer to airports is retarded
Seeing as people can barely drive on a road I wouldn't trust the average person to just start flying around
Same it wouldn’t be fun having to look up all the time because people decided to be an asshole in the flying car plus
lol yeah tbh
Foreal ppl gone get drunk and take a real flight
r/idiotsincars
Its gonna be ai dipshit
Neil: “Our brains can’t imagine the 4th dimension.”
Joe: “Actually if you try DMT........”
😂😂😂 this is an underated comment
Art of Anarous and factual
Did he say that lol?
5th dimension
Going through the visualisation of dimensions in terms of what you would see is interesting... i’ve done some potent drugs in my life, and i still cant even guess what the 4th dimension would be like.
You know what I love about this guy? He’s perfectly aware of his own personality and how it affects others but his so confident about what he’s saying he doesn’t feel the need to subscribe to normal social etiquette. He realizes that while everyone is entitled to their own opinion, they aren’t all created equal.
ypu his son or something? then stfu
What guy Joe rogan or Neil?
@@Worldwidegoat5 he his son
@@Worldwidegoat5 figured that was self apparent. joe is your "every guy". people like him because he's about as average as average gets. i may not agree with everything he says, but neil has dedicated his life to the pursuit of knowledge regarding a finite subject. his opinion on things related to it will inevitably be superior to others
@@esoteric404 geez ok
The 4th dimension is storing the paper/document as a PDF on your computer
This comment needs to be heard
Interesting
You could argue that the PDF file itself is a 1-dimensional stream of data
@@Delta0001-y
Wrapped around in a spiral on a 2-D surface using the electro-magnetic force of a 3-D universe that is entangled with the 4th dimension on a quantum scale.
@@manictiger those are all just implementation details ;)
This sounds like someone who owns a flying car that doesn’t want any one else to get one
lol
💯
Evolution, flying cars... is the future
Naw
This xD
Neil speaks on extremely simple things and tries to make it sound so profound.
Joe: Why aren’t Koala’s bears?
Neil: They’re Marsupials. Not bears. Appreciate marsupials for what they are. They carry their young in a pouch. It’s such an amazing aspect of nature, of course they’re not bears.
Joe: Because they don’t meet the Koalafications
Zuxtra
How else do you get non-scientific people to be interested in science? He popularizes science and does a god damn good job of it.
omg
Yet it's scientists _who know everything and never get it wrong_ that named them *Koala Bears* 🤣
Koalafications. That's hilarious!!! Love that. Hehe
Zuxtra 😂😂😂😂😂
Flying cars just sound cool and something out of a science fiction movie. Flying cars are called helicopters, in reality. Neil has an interesting and a wise perspective on things. That’s why I admire him greatly.
Clint Eastwood has a pilot's license to fly a helicopter The traffic was that bad Los Angeles in the 1970s that's how he got from his house on the hills to Paramount studios
flying cars are not science fiction in fact they showed one that already exists, the truth is not at all wise in fact there he showed how little he knows about physics by trying to evade the subject
@@diegoalejandro8362 You just want something looking like a car that flies well you have helicopter which flies it basically doesn't look like a car that's it. Neil definitely is correct i agree upon him completely.
@@johnpeter2609 no, a helicopter is not made to function like a car, it is super noisy, it is made for military purposes, to transport very large loads, not at all similar to a private car
I conceed a helicopter is close, but it is not a flying car in my book unless it can practically replace a car.
1960: In 2019 we will have flying cars
2019: We don’t need flying cars
1969: we are going to change planes routes for baseball
Fr man wtf lol imagine people in the 15 hundres probly thought me and you litterally speaking you and i (dont know your name) were guna be looking like the jetsons but in reality how much has really changed? What the craziest thing right now? An iphone wow a lil device with everything in it somthing that was eventually guna be made
2039: still don't need them. Thanks.
Lmao
@@Bass1ne the crazy thing that happened is called "internet" the fact that I'm typing this and you can read it instantly as I posted it is waay useful than freaking flying cars, side not we are probably on two different continents, this would have blow their minds back in the 60's!
Elon Musk: “if you want a flying car, just stick wheels on a helicopter”
Lmao that's basically what they did too
It's more like
Neil: hey Elon I'm giving some publicity for your tunnel products
Joe: it's sounds like someone is selling PR in my podcast
Elon: this is awesome, my products are not profitable, but enough speculations will make my stocks go up
Idiots: yeah smoking weed, play video games, masterbate, and buy Bitcoin is smart move
@@jayjawad3598 I don't know bro I feel like what you just said was kind of weird
Dee Hardin I don’t know Mr BOT, but first prove me that you’re not a bot or I will flag you with Googlr
@@jayjawad3598 Smoking weed, playing video games, and masturbating doesn't make you an idiot. (You spelled masturbating wrong but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just say it was a typo) The only thing that really makes you an idiot is buying Bitcoin in my opinion.
This is how you're supposed to teach/learn. Don't just answer the question, but target the root of that question to fully break down and analyze what you're asking. Only then can you become fully aware of the question's entirety.
Agreed, but some people don't even a fraction of the mental capacity or attention span that it takes to withstand what it means to truly means to ponder and question these questions
Very very well said,this should be the type of conversation between a student and a teacher
Nah, this dude needs to stop bullshitting with the mental gymnastics and get to the point!!
@@CCbat33 I was thinking that but he breaks down the second and third dimension so you can understand what its like.
@@valiggy1143 ok
This man lives outside of the box and he is one of the best teachers I have ever listened to, imo💯
Neil says the most ordinary things as if they’re the first time anyone has ever thought of them
Mcauley Holmes 😂
Because people take ordinary everyday things for granted.
Because the dude views everyone around him as a nuisance because of his own intelligence
@@UncleFLarry More like he just knows things as they are, wonderous and complex. He wants others to appreciate it as much as him
Only sounds too complex for the dumbasses
"Listen to me, Joe... when you put the sugar IN the coffee, you have CHANGED the flavor of the coffee."
Brother I'd listen to him give a tutorial on how to use nails
And Joe is: " wooooow thats crazy bro"
Lol. Neil makes the most ordinary things sound extraordinary.
I feel like Tyson is skilled at extending whatever point he is making to 10 extra min than needed
AvWorgen well then he’d make a wonderful youtuber
he’s useful for slow learners
Do you think Joe got him stoned? Seriously.
That last part, that's where you're mistaken. It's needed because Joe "Whoaaaaaa airplanes make noise" Rogan is high as fuck. This is, ironically, the highest he's ever been on the podcast.
True but that is the case with most showman or public speakers
I've been in 4 car accidents in my life (none of them serious). Imagine an accident in the sky. How many people survive plane and helicopter crashes? Exactly.
How many people die of plane crashes compared to car crashes each year? Exactly, but we live with it. If instead of an attachment to your car we made self flying drones, in the end the deaths may be far lower than cars. Also, each seat fitted with a parachute may be as effective as a seat belt or airbag. Not 100 percent but better than nothing.
@@coffeeperson1461 How many people travel by plane? And those are professional pilots, not your average granny.
@@skd That's why I said self flying with parachutes. In the end the crashes would be fewer and death percentage far lower than cars.
@@coffeeperson1461 What parachutes? There's traffic up there now. The parachutes won't help. You will end up meat on a blade.
@@skd And a seatbelt won't help with your head off but we still use them.
I love it when Neil ignores joe rogan and just continues his explanation... joe tries to throw him off. It’s an awesome dynamic
It's no longer a real conversation and just comes off weird. Why interview someone if you're not listening?
No joe is coming off dumb as fuck here. He keeps trying to interrupt because he’s not getting it.
@@Bejaardenbus i think he’s interrupting him on purpose bc thats what neil does to joe
@@aelechko Must be your First NDT Podcast. The man can’t shut up/stop interrupting. He has interesting things to say, no doubt, but very annoying
@@Bejaardenbus This is exactly why I hate him. He interrupts at the most important points, to add nothing useful. It's like talking to a child with ADD.
“It’s a boat, but for the air”
Jack D 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Such a stoner comment haha
I laughed so hard holy fuck Joe
I saw this comment just as he said it lmao
Crazy i Read This Just When He Said it Lol Trippy
Neil: A subway is just as effective as a flying car.
Joe: Not to the person with a flying car!
Victor Schauberger?.
I mean, he’s not wrong lol
This is only one of two times that someone has said something that made me remember something that seems surreal that I had forgotten about; that is, planes being so loud that you couldn't have a conversation when one flow over. I remember the teacher would have to stop talking when a plane flew over. I forgot all about that.
The only other time was when a little kid said to me, "I forgot how to fly in my dreams when I turned 4"
I don't remember what we were talking about at that time.
This man literally explaining bookshelves and tunnels to joe.
He's always tryng extremely hard to make basic stuffs sound mindblowning. annoying guy, this neil
@@HuyNgo-yi4nd nothing like that. He is just trying to make people see that the concepts of physics (4th dimensions and stuff like that) are not farfetched and have real-world practical applications...
I think it's all that Joe can do not to lunch across the table and choke this guy. Just kidding that's the Joe of 20 years ago today's Joe is a lot cooler than that.
@@robertfan332 You don’t know Joe Rogan bruh🤣
@@tomasprior3328 Yeah hes explaining everything into simpler terms, he does a good job at simplifying his thoughts
"They're called helicopters"
Joe responds
"They're called helicopters"
2:44
Don’t interrupt my preprepared science rant Joe 😂
Average duration of marijuana high, smoked: 3 hours
Average duration of Joe Rogan podcast: 3 hours
🤔
ZemikianUchiha not if your smoking legal bunk like 30 mins smh
Ben Miles true but most people have high tolerances too
Coincidence? I think not
I see this as an absolute win
Ben Miles legal bunk? Legal shit is gas wym hahah U must be getting ripped off. Still no longer than 45 mins tho
Traffic laws with flying cars are legitimately the same as on the ground. Thats Neil's point.
1980: people "we will use flying car"
2020: Degrass "we don't need flying car"
More like:
2020: “subways are flying cars”
We will use flying roads
This was 2018 DegrassE. Get it straight
@@KineticTaco no one cares
Even Elon musk says flying cars are trash
“Tunnels”
_”It’s like a boat”_
“Bridges”
_”But for air”_
Jason Darko I also thought this was fucking funny
"It's like a boat but for the air." - Joe Rogan 2018
Airsoftdeathroll 😂😂😂
Technically speaking, boat still moves in two dimensions, unlike plane. So it's a car for the water.
It's more like a flying submarine
@Sateki Taulanga, never driven a boat down the waterfall....
True stoner speak
Joe listing all the downsides of subway transportation and never mentioning that a base annual pass isn't going to cost 100k or more right off the bat.
Joe: says anyth-
Neil: YOU DON’T WANT A FLYING CAR APPRECIATE THE THIRD DIMENSION.
Flat earthers only exist in the second dimension!!!
@Jon Whitehead the 4th dimension is time bruh. Besides, dimensions arent anything other than how much depth or lack there of something has.
@Jon Jon actually time is the 4th dimension
PLEASE MAKE A PODCAST WITH ELON MUSK AND NEIL
Bring Alex Jones along too!
I’ve smoked blunts with a+ , tajai, phesto, and opio.... TWICE .
Nice
neil dont really like that pretentious ass elon musk
Koal Swisley Neil is a leftist who hates Alex and Ben, obviously
"Flying cars are like boats, but for the air".
-Joe Rogan
"It's like Speed 2, except instead of getting hijacked on a boat, we're getting hijacked on a bus."
Milhouse
A quote from Joe ''I'm not high af'' Rogan
i think a hot air balloon is a better for that analogy.
yeah, he has gotten dumber recently..
I just like for the Cholula hot sauce...I didn't even read what you said....
Instant teleportation divice is what we need
Jamie understands this fully. He has an A in physics after all
Haha!!
Oooh yeah, I remember when he said that. That's closure right there. lmfao
Khoa Nguyen hes is getting all the stuff from a bogus GoFundMe thing. if jamie is the guy pulling stuff up on the computer.
Bull shit all day long.
lol
I’m Going down the rabbit hole of Joe Rogan clips please help me😂😂😂
Same 😂😂
Same also😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Who isnt😂
Thumbnail fine af
One of us
But as soon as flying cars became popular, they would be restricted to certain airspace, and there would be traffic too. Unless its something most people can't get their hands on, eventually it will be congested.
They'd probably require some sort of system where flying cars would detect others in the vicinity, share their flight path with each other and make a decision that alters one or both cars courses to avoid collision. Then if you're in manual mode the car's computer would probably just take over control if you were getting too close to someone and there was a chance of a collision.
@@KJ110813 yeah but the problem is congestion. Even if its super safe and reliable and affordable, everyone wants a piece of it, causing a lot of traffic and not much of a solution to avoiding traffic
@@yourfavoriteclaymationpeng2926 One huge thing that would contribute to less congestion would be the fact that there would be overall a very significant decreases in the distances traveled by commuters, due to the ability of people to take much more direct routes to their destinations than is possible with a road system. Roads and freeways are designed based on the distribution of the population, the frequency with which they travel to various places, and the projected trends of that activity in the near future. With flying cars, congestion could be dealt with much easier as trends changed with little need for changes in infrastructure.
If it ever turned into a thing, I don't think they will let them be designed fly too high from the ground. And probably wouldn't be allowed to fly more than a few feet in major cities if at all.
As long as they were at an altitude lower than commercial air traffic, I don't see why it would be a problem to fly at altitudes significantly above the ground and above buildings. The only problem that could arise would be if a flying car were to malfunction and could no longer maintain flight. That could be solved (or the damage at least minimized) by designing parachutes durable and large enough to significantly slow the vehicle before it makes impact with the ground or buildings.
Can we have the whole show? Amazing man!
Joe: We need flying cars
Neil: We have tunnels and bridges - same thing.
Joe: Uhhhmmmmm... no
Dude is dumber than a bag of rocks. He says earth is shaped like a pear.
@@beetlejuice4357 earth is not a sphere u know that right?
A flying car is essentially what a helicopter is no matter which way you look at it. That is the point Neil is making, and he is saying that the tunnel and bridge system allows for that 3rd dimensional travel that you can obtain WITHOUT the need of something that can fly. So unless you want to pilot a "flying car", stick to the road or increase your IQ so you can become a pilot and not make dumb comments like this lol
@@Kataklysm1234 he didn't advocate personal helicoptors, which would have made actual sense to the conversation.
You don't have to restate his position about tunnels and bridges, trying to look smart by showing how you got it and pretending it makes him look smart.
It's one of the stupidest things he's ever said and you look dumb for defending it, while attempting to look smart because you "got the 3 dimensional part!" Omg, the more I attempt to explain how stupid you AND him sound, the more I am thinking we need to do away with public schools like yesterday.
@@confusedalex5612 ya because you know dick head
“Sky rage” sounds like a badass plane dogfighting video game
Neil is smart but damn if he doesn't take *FOREVER* to say the simplest shit.
It's because he assumes the majority of the population aren't very bright.
@@pierreo33 he is assuming correctly
@@pierreo33 the majority of the population literally is dumb as fuck. Like most people.
You understand his point when hes done though dont you
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
Joe twirling his phone on purpose to Niel was the funniest thing I've seen
"If a flying car fails... Your dead"
-NDT
Literally sums it up.
Anthony Cassola planes fail
@@austinhopkins4191 they're are less planes and they're not going to collide with each other
@@austinhopkins4191 flying car is not a plane. Plane and cars have to rely on different mechanics to fly. Otherwise I don't see difference why should even it called a car. When planes fail they can still fly and land because they have wings and they also have high altitude and speed. Planes don't maneuver much. They fly in straight lines. Also flying cars are would be essential for large cities, for fast traveling in crowded places....Nobody in city rush time has time for gaining kilometers of altitudes before going straight towards to destination. It should be something "mass produce'able" and something that people can easily fit it to their garage.
Put that saying on a shirt.
He said "you're dead" not "your dead".
The way Neil talks makes me understand everything so easily
Sarcasm at its finest 😭😭😭
Jayden Timsans idk I understand better cuz of Neil
Without hearing anything.
Niel:
“We already have flying cars. They’re called helicopters...”
Joe:
“Well, helicopters were originally invented for that...”
Niel:
“They’re called HELICOPTERS”
Zebulous Neil*
whats really going on #reality well yeah because people rather learn how to drive a car rather than a helicopter you idiot
@whats really going on #reality What makes you think flying cars would be able to do that?
I don't get it, can you please explain the joke?
@whats really going on #reality Same principle as a flying car. It has a cab with two people in it that can fly you to work or be used for business.
“It’s like boat, but for the air”😂😂😂
Neil is the kind of guy who says the simplest thing but uses language to make it seem like he’s making the most important point ever
Yeah bunch of words that makes absolutely no sense spoke like it actually is most important thing in the world. Its still just retarded BS
@@mgecko2959 you're wrong
Mike Cambell no im not wrong, his conception of tunnel being 3rd dimension according to his rules of movement is plain retarded
Lol I laughed hard
@@mgecko2959 see my previous comment
No one loves listening to Neil like Neil loves listening Neil.
BIG ERN He has a podcast. And a tv show that’s just him talking. A lot of people like to listen to him speak. His podcast has won like 3 emmys.
I like listening to neil almost as much as neil likes listening to neil, so I'm okay with it.
Just finished listening to the three and a half hour podcast that this is from. I like listening to Neil speak.
i like listening to Neil more than Neil likes listening to Neil.
And no one likes listening to you
"You sound like a man who's trying to sell me something better than a flying car!!"
wtf is that pfp, scariest thing i ever saw
@@youngsharmuta3691 pretty sure its doctor who
@@damiannichols1250 that didnt help.
@@youngsharmuta3691 It's a Goomba from the Mario movie
There won't be a flying cars!!! What is a car any way, it is something that you drive... so if one need to drive on the ground then you have a vehicle, you want to drive in the air, well afford a helicopter, or anything that can fly...
“That doesn’t work”
Joe: “It does with boats” 🤣🤣
Neil "I've smoked too much deGrasse" Tyson
MAYNARD -1 too*
Beautifully said
Boy, the thing he's talking about are told in the first year of engeneering
_Yeahhh_
Tyson was never the same after he came outa prison.
“It’s like a boat.....but for the air” Y.E.S.
Joe is a super wise dude but sometimes it’s obvious that nobody checks him for saying dumb shit
I think he meant submarine because a boat only moves in 2 dimensions 😂
@@nwalkernc i think it’s just a joke, no need to over think it
More like a submarine with a rocket at the back for maunuverability.
Solar sails.
It would be chaos. there'd be no designated roads. Drunk drivers and dummies would turn into missiles. The infrastructure to monitor and regulate the traffic would be immense.
And it'd be noisy.
There's this thing called computers. Look it up.
We can't do that even in two dimensions properly yet... and computers don't get rid of the noise flying cars would produce..
We would need better technology to do flying cars.
Death24 what the fuck does that even mean?
Passenger drones are coming park at the small suburban airport fly into the city.
The difference between tunnels/bridges and flying cars is huge. The great part of flying cars would be the lack of required infrastructure. With a tunnel sure I can get around the person above me but only where there are tunnel entrances. With a flying car to get around you I could go up down left right and a combination of any of those 4.
Use your brain. Firsty, everyone who needs to drive a flying car would need to have crazy qualifications, look how hard flying a plane is. If a car fails, it stops. If a flying car fails, it crashes and you die, and it might even crash into a building. And if it falls, not only will you die, the people around the crash will die to, because it will just explode. You'd have to train people to rear coordinates, deal with turbulence, most people would just give up trying to fly it.
"You can fly up, left, right." That would take an awful lot of fuel, only rich people would be able to have it. It will also make way too much noise, just as Tyson says drones are so loud you can't have conversations. Imagine cars flying everywhere, the noise pollution would be off the charts.
Also, you would definitely need infrastructure, otherwise cars would be crashing left and right. Please tell me how you can have millions of cars flying the air with no infastructure. How do you even figure out routes in the air, it's so hard that each driver would need to have a background in engineering. You won't even be able to use it whenever the weather goes berserk
@vol94 I know this was a year ago. But some of what you are saying that is essentially dumb, is possible. Noise? Electric propulsion with fan blade design could get noise to acceptable levels. Be able to operate it? Not a problem. Flying really isn't that hard, but these flying vehicles will be highly automated. A monkey will be able to operate it. Commercial planes essentially can be practically flow by a novice now. Crashing into things and safety? It would be regulated. Such vehicle would have to have proven safety measures in case of failures or sufficient backups. Really no different than air planes but one would not need and airport or a pilots license. Probably have its own category of licensing less strict as pilots licenses. I can see driving it to a neighborhood launch point and taking off. How to navigate? Again most of that will be automated into onboard navigation. There likely be a government system to establish air routes and to maintain clearance to others. Will it be expensive? Probably. We probably should stop calling them flying cars. They will be hybrid air vehicles (HAV). The ground portion would not be far distance. It's going to be like an EV but with ability to to to hover and fly. Advantage, higher travel speed and more flexibility in path and likely more direct path.
Your theory works if you’re the only one flying a car. Otherwise you can’t go up and down as you wish since there are other cars that would be occupying that lane.
@@FetsumBerhaneDire I guess it would depend on the location. La or NYC traffic would probably be to congested to simply go around. In 99% of the world you wouldn't even have to worry if people spread out over 1000 ft.
Neal talking about the sheets of paper and the third dimensions
Like he's in an anime
I kick life's ass you Neil’s Gate;
Neil the type of person that goes into detail for everything,
Neil's kids: dad where do babies come from?
Neil: see we have these tunnels....
Lol
You laughed at your own joke
Yea i thought it was funny, and apparently 85 other people did too.
Key and peele skit
@@Po0h45 which skit exactly?
😂😂
Neil Tyson: It's airfoil noise
UA-cam closed caption subtitles: I never boil boys
Me: Ok
Talk about useless.. I once pondered on the idea of starting a caption service for UA-cam or UA-camrs channels like podcasts and such. Well I was disappointed when I learned that they already have that option, but was even more disappointed when I seen just how much of a piece of shit it is
CYLop 11:36. Lmfao
LMAO!
UA-cam subtitle is a total crap
Shit had me rolling
I just want cars with wings and rockets but here’s Neil teaching us about physics 😭😭
Neil tries to get as deep in everything as deep as he does in astrophysics.
Imagine listening to his crap all the time! Painful bullshit!
He must have a happy wife
@@luizmarinho6138 or no wife at all? Idk he's probably married 🤷♂️
john mark Higgins you sound a bit dense, friend.
It's kinda his job lol
He's an educator
When Neil says “Just watch” you know he’s about to come up with a brilliant example and explanation to help the other person better understand what he’s talking about. I love it.
And all the people that can’t keep up with him start to tune out and return to their original position.
He is an idiot
@@Freedomiseverything9486 Yes you are!
Well nothing brilliant in this video tho...
Everyone in the past who always said “never” usually always proven wrong
Joe is easily impressed. I breathe in and out and had food today, Joe's response "Woooooooooow, that's crazy"
Stephen Robinson you ever done DMT?
😂😂😂
Joe: Elk Meat Elk Meat Viking DNA, DMT
That's crazy man. Crazy world we live in. Have you ever tried DMT ? There are people, native tribe of Amazon , who sucks the dicks of young possums to get high with DMT
"Consider that if you were in a self driving car and it wants to change lanes, it communicates that to the other cars."
We've been doing that since 1909, they're called indicators.
Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooppppppppppppppppppppppppoppppp ooooo o ii iiip Lo j I like you king 🤴 love you all io lI’ll I hope you have fun 🤩 on the day of ppl on ithe I out to the king ill be where at kpof 🏊♂️ king of the lord and the lord bless lord of grace grace and blessings to you and lord lord of grace grace and grace grace for grace grace and grace grace for grace grace and grace grace for
Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads.
We're going back'
Nobody calls me chicken!
Nice comment
Don't take money. Don't take fame. Don't need no credit card to ride this train.
Its your kids somethings gotta be done about your kids
Neil DeGrasse - let's move in a 3rd dimension
Joe Rogan - hold my DMT
"Explains this to me like im a 5 year old"
-Michael Scott
I’m glad Joe is asking all the important questions when he gets one of the wolds top scientists in the studio.
When you don’t study and you trying to convince your professor your answer is right 😂
“Joe Rogan getting interrupted for 16 minutes straight.”
He's also ignoring half of what Neil says, he's dishing it as good as he's getting but he's trying to make it fun to watch for less curious viewers too
Bruh he’s high asf and Neil is the one being interviewed and he’s just giving long answers to joes questions
@@bryan73701 , noticed that too, Bryan...seem like Neil enjoys hearing himself speak.
Joe have nothing to say. He didn't said anything worth in the whole video hahahah
Good
My usual MO for bypassing traffic is to travel in the 4th dimension. I just change my work time from 8 to 5 instead by working from 6 to 3.
WoW.. this is really good comment.
This is dead on.
@@ClearAtaraxia in fact we have no idea how it works as we cant imagine it, right ?
Idk where the hell you commute, but 6:00pm isn’t the fourth dimension where I live; it’s rush hour.
@@CovertPhilosopher the 4th dimension is time... there are 4 dimensions that you currently live in. 3 spacial, and one special (time)
I guess it depends on what you call a "car". People have already scaled up drone parts and put a seat on it, and can fly around on them. Only wouldn't work in cities.
2:44 - We already have flying cars... They're called Helicopters
5:34 - If a flying car fails... RIP Kobe
bro too soon
@@penisbutthole1720 dont be a sissy
@Black_Rhino 241 how time flies haha
Sasuke Uchiha unlike the helicopter
@@JustSleepyK yea i know i can hate, but i wont cus you already hate yourself🤣🤣🤣
When your teacher explains something to you for the fifth time and then asks if you understand: 7:37
Hahaha I've been there
Lmfa ahahahaha this is the best comment
Literally saw this comment as the time popped up lol
His brain is shutting down at this point, he has a massive headache.
This needs to be a meme lol
meanwhile in Romania we are still waiting for our 8th highway, lmao.
You guys have highways in Romania??
-your neighbor Moldova
Igor Lukyan what's a highway? Your distant neighbor in the US
@my name is my name u work for the system, on the 1% side, dont wanna see people even figure out how to make a semi decent life for them self?
Gotta start somewhere.
Damn I genuinely feel for you people in countries I've barely heard of and know nothing about :/ meanwhile you people know more about Donald Trump than I do. MERICA
I love how its like a highschool student having a conversation with a cool teacher lmao
Neil (let me share something with you) deGrasse Tyson
@@devinpledger8160 haha damn your long profile name
Jonathan Ventura i would have asked him math questions.
He should meet Joey "Let me tell you somethin dawg" Diaz
Lol comment of the week here
There is also an argument that I heard somewhere that if we complain about car accidents in 2d roads what would it be like in 3d much worse
Can we clone Neil and have him be a permanent guest on the show? Anytime someone says something stupid he would correct them and educate us in such an entertaining way.
Bahhhhhh Go back to sheep.. Your science prophet has spoken. Nothing to see here folks.
sure once Neil stops lying and making shit up
neil would just shill talking points for the most part. I love how his future fantasy is self driving cars at 120MPH...OHHH WOW, stop every human from physically driving so the future of travel can be cars still at 120mph on the ground...dumb fuck
Even the clone would havd better things to do
Come sit on santas lap
He describes regular road traffic in the most exciting ways
The sound created from air hitting a man made object traveling at highway speed is the most underrated sound ever. With no muffler my 74 charger engine sounds like a purr over the wind at 120mph, its crazy how loud air is
Joe is really trying to push those magnetic bumpers
"We do have flying cars they're called helicopters"
paramotors, jetpacks, helicopters, hot air balloons, airplanes, etc...they all are effective at travelling because they don't have to navigate around obstacles at ground level like cars do. You can save much more time if you fly over an obstacle instead of going around it neil is way off on this topic
That moment when nobody recognises your invention, the helicopter, as a flying car.
mic drop
@@GrowingDownUnder in a vacuum yes, but it's an absolute logistical HELL on earth if everyone was doing it. Do you realize how many people would fucking die every single day? We can't drive cars as it is.
BB-BUT THEY AINT GOT NO STEERING WHEEL DOE, AND FOUR WHEELS!
Legalizing prostitution would fix this very quickly.
En P and drugs you know what's up
you must be from america cos prostitution is legal in most western countries
the traffic still sucks. getting to the whore house creates more traffic cos otherwise id be jerking off in front of the computer
@@Skankhunt420. if you guys are ugly b****** that's the problem
En P Nope you don’t get it.
If you had automated cars you wouldn't need lanes, just one giant lane on the 405 with vehicles weaving in and out going fast since they'd all be communicating with each other.
“Tunnels and bridges are flying cars.” Neil deGrasse Tyson
Na bro i disagree
Bruh, you just aren't smart enough understand what NDT is saying.
Joe Ferrari what about traffic on the bridge ??😂
@@exposurebuilds2100 Why do people think that if there were flying cars there would be no traffic , airplanes have to face traffic and they are much less in numbers . It's not practical enough.
pranshul aggarwal if there were an extra way of transportation such as that we’d have about three ways also mind you airplanes would be higher up above then all the flying cars or that would be very idiotic now look back to your point you said there would be traffic still, I never said anything about there not being traffic but I can assure you there would be less traffic because not only would we have on ground and underground transportation, but we’d also have a third option but knowing the humans on this planet that can’t drive correctly on ground what shows they’ll know above ground. I don’t want car parts falling from the sky 😂
We're so lucky Neil deGrasse is so patient
He's the opposite. He's always condescending and doesn't want to let other people speak.
@@EdSuavePerez He's a genius, I've never denied that. But he often interrupts people that just want to speak their mind, or even when they're asking a question to him.
He probably doesn't need to listen, but he should, just to show some respect and kindness.
@@Albanez39 In that aspect, then yes i do respect your opinion, and i'd have to agree. Ive have seen where NDT in some cases interrupts the speaker, and i think that just maybe because of his passion for the field, or it can also mean a lack of communication skills in a very small area which can be fixed if someone brings up the matter.
It can be a little annoying because sometimes interrupting someone can leave you out on information, but on Tyson's end like you said, listening does show respect and kindness, even if you don't realize it.
He's a fucking loud mouthed idiot who doesn't understand what 3d is.
Dont you mean Joe?
Nah I never wanted a flying car because I wanted to bypass traffic. I wanted one so I could bypass all obstructions.
You can't even get a drone to bypass your neighbor's wall.
Great Video! Neil if you would have been one of my teachers in high school I would have gone in a totally different direction in life! You are an amazing man Mr. Tyson!
You make it sound like you're life went totally sideways and now you're homeless lol
@@Kyoto_150 Far from it. I own 2 business. I've done blue collar labor for 30 years. Thru school preaching hard work and hard labor is how u make a living. Neil would have opened my mind to endless directions of wonderful opportunities. 🙂
He's a self absorbed narcissistic know it all full of hubris that doesn't know it all. The stupidest thing he said was about the planes landing gear making all that noise on landing. It's the air brakes and flaps.
I like how he talks like science is magic, well it kind of is magic.
unrefusableoffer All science isn’t magic but all magic is science....
Not really. Its religion for athiests
@@JMS849 not really if you have a brain u can understand it
@@BestofBestStudio More than half of it is theories and yeah science is getting better but lots of scientists are not telling the truth.
J.M.$ A for an thought to be considered a theory in science, there must be a lot of evidence that already proves it right then wrong. So you’re way better of believing a well approved. And them not telling the truth is literally the opposite of their job. Their job is to discover something new, or improve some information. Anyway what exactly do you mean on what they aren’t saying the truth.
When Tyson said , " They're called helicopters." , the second time , Joe knew to STFU and listen
Theres a thing called a flying car, it's called a plane or a helicopter but not everybody is allowed to buy one and fly everywhere obviously. We need laws to protect us against ourselves. The barrier between the flying car and the average Joe is laws, not tech.
Well, not just that. By virtue of being on the ground you have better control on the ground. Anything in the air has a whole host of control issues that make them more of a nuisance to operate than a land vehicle. It's not just a matter of law, but also a matter of market forces and convenience.
Yea trusting billions of people to drive safer in flying cars is also hard. Requires a lot more focus and situational awareness.
@@voifont well SpaceX has rockets that can land and they don't use runways so we do have that technology just not yet implemented with cars..
None of you idiots understand how AI is going to change your lives.
We can still opt out of AI unless it completely enslaves or destroys us, and if that happens it's beyond our control anyway so who cares? The only way it's going to change my life is if it completely takes over the world or is forced upon me for some reason. And if that happens there's nothing I can do about it really.
I’ve been saying this about hellicopters forever I’m so happy he said that
No one:
Not even Joe Rogan:
Neil: BRIDGES AND TUNNELS ARE FLYING CARS!!!
APPRECIATE THE 3RD DIMENSION!!!
Joe is so high, it detracts from this.
He's just a dumbass
Nono he is the magic salt my friend, withouthim it would just be normal table salt
A few months back me and my mate were baked and looked up at a helicopter and said that they are basically flying cars, now I've just found this video and now I'm convinced Neil smokes
I was thinking the same lmao
wooooooooow :D
“It’s not a free for all”
“It is with boats” 😂😂
Neil ignored that comment XD
Well daily, most people travel from and to man made structures, grocery store, work, home...not too many of those floating on water.
@@georgedepalma429 Yeah but guess what? There is a thing called a "dock" where you can put your boat, then you can WALK to the stores using your legs! Yeah! And then buy what you want and go back into your boat. Easy. I know walking to stores is pretty insane from an American perspective, but try it sometime.
@@LetsGoGetThem Ok waterworld, again, most of the population still live on land. After you dock, how safe would you feel walking with your soy frappuccino if cars had a free for all like boats. Or worrying about a flying car crash into an apartment building cause they also had a free for all. You got me? If not, best get back on your boat then.
And most of the population living by water is either aware of boats and/or use them. Who is saying that there would be a free for all? There really isn't for boats (www.hmy.com/rules-of-the-waterways-for-boating-and-yachting), and despite cars having rules I am WAAAYYY more concerned about idiots crashing into me driving their cars than I am at sea, despite there being a free for all for boats (there isn't). I would know since my family owned a boat growing up with a boat spot too which I went to pretty much every summer, cruising around the area. Where I live a lot of people ride their boats during the summer and dock elsewhere to eat or visit. I was mainly opposed to your comment suggesting nobody uses a boat to travel to and from stores. They most definitely do. Also, you're calling me waterworld? I guess if your logic being that you can't possibly go to a store from a boat unless it "floats on water" then it makes sense you would consider anyone using a boat as "waterworld", lol. Really not that crazy, bud. Also epic soy joke, yeah, because correcting you on how people use boats mean I must be a SOY BOY.
My grade six science project was a magnetic floating car. But it required electromagnets one the car and the road to be laid out with magnets with different strength in oncoming traffic thus eliminating head on collisions. I’m aware it’s flawed; I was 11 haha
Joe: Asks
Neil: Explains
Joe: Ignores the explanation and asks the same question.
Explanation: Am I a joke to you ?
To: Elegant
Sweetie, seems more like Niel is ignoring the question and Joe is giving him an opportunity at not making himself look an argumentative know-it-all with no point. He didn't answer the question, he just evaded it by selling "3 dimensional highways" lol.
shechshire he answered quite well, yeah it was weird how he answered it but it was still answered it just took longer as Neil beats around the bush but it doesn’t mean he doesn’t have a point. He basically told him there wasn’t really a need for flying cars yet. He might seem like a know it all but that’s just misunderstanding a man who’s just trying for others to understand why he thinks otherwise
Joe “But What About My Magnet Theory” Rogan
Alright, hear me out:
Cars, but like _hot air baloons_
Hmmm I lik it
Remember the Hindenburg
Let's do this
Here's a better idea:
*Paramotors*
HOT CAR BALLOONS
Damn if I'm sleeping on a bunk bed than am I sleeping on a flying bed 🤯
😂😂