❓ What's WRONG With The NEW Google Logo???

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
  • ▶ Check out my gear on Kit: kit.com/willpat
    The newest Google logo has been making the rounds on the internet! Some say that this is a mistake by the Google design team, but is it?
    Newest Upload! • 🤓 How To Make A Better...
    Great Graphic Design Resources! creativemarket...?u=Willberto
    Instagram: / willpat
    Thanks for watching! Hope you enjoyed this video!
    If there's anything you would like me to cover in a UA-cam Video, then let me know by commenting down below!
    If you like what I do, and you want to partner with me:
    Partner with me through Patreon : patreon.com/use...
    Buy a T-Shirt or Poster,where some of the profits go staright to charity www.prophesyapp...
    Hire me: www.willpaters...
    If you would like me to design you a logo, poster or anything for your UA-cam Channel or business, then I'm your man! I would love to work with you to make what you want a reality! Check out my website and portfolio for more information.
    Hire me: www.willpaters...
    Family Friendly Content... lol

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,2 тис.

  • @GierlangBhaktiPutra
    @GierlangBhaktiPutra 7 років тому +4969

    I think most of the people here gonna watch the first two minutes and rage in the comments. Listen to the full video and you will know what this guy has to say.

    • @mrst0ne495
      @mrst0ne495 7 років тому +20

      watched it full, mesmerizing

    • @Antiganos
      @Antiganos 7 років тому +2

      Gierlang Bhakti Putra I'd love to be able to forcibly read your comment to these people.

    • @nathanielfernandez8188
      @nathanielfernandez8188 7 років тому

      Gierlang Bhakti Putra I

    • @fuffypanda1
      @fuffypanda1 7 років тому +2

      I did but the font still triggers me

    • @drypeeks
      @drypeeks 7 років тому +4

      It's like he just came from doing a Kingsman play for weeks

  • @beatezeuner1817
    @beatezeuner1817 7 років тому +1450

    they made the yellow smaller, because yellow is a very bright color, so in our perception it is stronger than the other colors. There is nothing wrong with a basically yellow logo, but I think google wanted the colors all to have the same perceived visual weight. That's basic color theory, you can read in any book about colors.

    • @faizanahmed1080
      @faizanahmed1080 7 років тому

      Beate Zeuner yeah

    • @samg3456
      @samg3456 7 років тому +63

      He literally says that two minutes in.

    • @beatezeuner1817
      @beatezeuner1817 7 років тому +16

      Sam oops skipped a bit around so i must have missed that...

    • @AquaSG.
      @AquaSG. 7 років тому +8

      That is why everyone targets yellow team ;3;

    • @mikescott4038
      @mikescott4038 7 років тому +16

      Sam watched at two minutes again and if i wasnt paying no attention at all, he didnt say anything about the balance of yellow

  • @Sercil00
    @Sercil00 7 років тому +45

    When I was studying typography and logo creation, I sometimes spent more time finetuning letters and logos like this than coming up with them. Deliberate "imperfections" make stuff interesting, but the sweet spot can be very slim.
    Loved making fonts, but it's kryptonite for perfectionists. You work hours making letters slightly thinner or thicker, and when you put them in a text and look at it from afar, they stick out as too white or dark. But you'll only notice 2 days later.

  • @wick5956
    @wick5956 7 років тому +949

    I respect that this 9 minute video picking apart a logo wasnt stretched to 10 minutes for ad revenue.

    • @willpatersondesign
      @willpatersondesign  7 років тому +40

      QKwoep ❤️

    • @alonelyspoon
      @alonelyspoon 7 років тому +58

      QKwoep that sounds plain stupid... if the video was 10 mins would that cut off your pleasure watching the video? Besides making money was never a bad thing. How are you respecting his inability to maximize his own personal gain (im not saying the video was bad, it was rly informative and interesting). Making a 10 min video isnt bad. Specially if it's by a content creator.

    • @babyface8992
      @babyface8992 7 років тому

      QKwoep i

    • @dxstiny02
      @dxstiny02 7 років тому +11

      I would be angry if someone made a 9.25-minute video and stretched it out just barely over 10 minutes for the purpose of ads, even if the video was still good and informative.

    • @alonelyspoon
      @alonelyspoon 7 років тому +35

      Pig Mayor how can you be angry about someone trying to make money... that's pure arrogance

  • @RyanYoung
    @RyanYoung 7 років тому +513

    I only watched this because UA-cam was being really persistent in recommending this to me for at least a week.

    • @percystarkfrost6468
      @percystarkfrost6468 7 років тому +2

      I've had to do that at least twice each month this year, honestly Google is like a five year old.
      I don't want to watch you and your math is wrong.

    • @Dalendrion
      @Dalendrion 7 років тому +3

      Just press the three dots next to the video and tell UA-cam you're not interested. Problem solved. Saves you 9 minutes and 14 seconds.

    • @absolute_kq
      @absolute_kq 7 років тому +3

      It's been like stupid persistent. It kept showing up in my recommended for the past month and today I finally caved

    • @AyushGupta-yj8jz
      @AyushGupta-yj8jz 6 років тому +4

      Google is interested in showing people how smart it is

    • @pradap2298
      @pradap2298 6 років тому

      piss

  • @AtomicShrimp
    @AtomicShrimp 7 років тому +50

    Nicely done. If it looks straight, it IS straight (Jimmy Diresta)

  • @Mirraslog0
    @Mirraslog0 7 років тому +344

    I wish I could love this video instead of just liking it! As a designer this whole situation really pisses me off, most people outside the business have no idea what optical corrections are, not everything needs to be perfectly mathematical. Eyeballs and brains are tricky and complex things!

    • @willpatersondesign
      @willpatersondesign  7 років тому +7

      TforTrouble thank you so much :)

    • @madisonxyz9887
      @madisonxyz9887 7 років тому +8

      TforTrouble But if someone outside of the field looks at it and thinks it's off that means the someone in the field messed up. The person outside probably doesn't know the real cause of the problem but the insider should look for it.

    • @patrickbutler87
      @patrickbutler87 7 років тому +1

      Although it's kind of nice to see that you have a leg up on many people out there claiming to be experts.

    • @taltigolt
      @taltigolt 7 років тому +4

      i worked in powerpoint on my ui design i kept trying to allign the letters perfectly and then i zoomed out and noticed how they aren't the same size and no matter how much i zoomed in to get them the same size the result were still looking different sizes now i know why, i thought something was wrong with powerpoint that he text wouldn't stay the same size even if i zoomed in.

    • @DanHarkless_Halloween_YTPs_etc
      @DanHarkless_Halloween_YTPs_etc 7 років тому +1

      +NMT: In the old days UA-cam had "Like" and "Favorite" actions. You can still make a public "Favorites" playlist and hit "Add to" to add a video to it, though.

  • @-r-
    @-r- 7 років тому +256

    Respect to this man for not making his video 10 min

    • @willpatersondesign
      @willpatersondesign  7 років тому +3

      Prathusa Fast ❤️

    • @loafy8532
      @loafy8532 7 років тому +8

      So, if the video was 10 minutes long, you wouldn't respect him?

    • @-r-
      @-r- 7 років тому +6

      Eskilo No, it is just respect for not giving a shit about the money.

    • @madisonxyz9887
      @madisonxyz9887 7 років тому +3

      Prathusa Fast I don't see why that matters.

    • @-r-
      @-r- 7 років тому

      Falafel I never said that he shouldn't get respect if his video was over 10 min all I said was that we should appreciate the fact that he did not strech the video even 45 seconds.

  • @rickhagemeijer5157
    @rickhagemeijer5157 7 років тому +2256

    gee and me over here just thinking it was another google logo

    • @icaruskirota2711
      @icaruskirota2711 7 років тому +7

      ikr

    • @veelol8679
      @veelol8679 7 років тому +20

      I wanted to like this comment, but it had 666 likes... And I couldn't change that

    • @veelol8679
      @veelol8679 7 років тому +3

      PICKLE RICK pfft, yeah, I can

    • @QuadiePoo
      @QuadiePoo 7 років тому +2

      I didn’t even know it changed

    • @navlagodmad6860
      @navlagodmad6860 7 років тому

      A

  • @bruceli9094
    @bruceli9094 7 років тому +258

    Mathematically Wrong. Visually Perfect.

  • @JThePlante
    @JThePlante 7 років тому +32

    This really shows how much time is spent on perfecting logos that we usually don't actually think about!

  • @blueeberrie4396
    @blueeberrie4396 7 років тому +479

    Anyone who wants to be a graphic designer or typographer should know this. It's basics.

    • @pawehbsam5872
      @pawehbsam5872 7 років тому +2

      Bluee Berrie true!!

    • @randomuser66438
      @randomuser66438 7 років тому +1

      What more do you suggest? I don't want exactly to be a "graphic" designer, but i do want to be a web designer. So... If you have some suggestions of more concepts like that i would appreciate. :)
      PS: sorry for any grammar errors. English isn't my native language. >.

    • @blueeberrie4396
      @blueeberrie4396 7 років тому +12

      There's a lot of concepts, but I think you are on a good way, if you care enough to watch educational videos. Best would be some school or courses since there is so much stuff all around it.
      I am not a native speaker as well. :')

    • @randomuser66438
      @randomuser66438 7 років тому +1

      Okay. I'll follow your tips. Thank you!

    • @brzodroid
      @brzodroid 7 років тому +3

      But most people are not so they dont know about this

  • @Naveication
    @Naveication 7 років тому +309

    His perfect circle G looks like a really good power button symbol that has been rotated by 90°

    • @Wakkiau
      @Wakkiau 7 років тому +6

      Naveication yeah this actually it basically no longer represent google.

  • @Supportik
    @Supportik 7 років тому +670

    Its G not a circle.

    • @MsPurplebutterly
      @MsPurplebutterly 7 років тому +52

      I love thigh high socks. Watch the whole video please.

    • @TylerDehan
      @TylerDehan 7 років тому +69

      MsPurplebutterly I think he was just addressing that in the first place why do people even expect it to be a circle when it's a G.

    • @cutecommie
      @cutecommie 7 років тому +19

      I too love thigh high socks.

    • @arctyze
      @arctyze 7 років тому +6

      RIGHT! I was saying that to myself the whole time!

    • @xdkfpjacob
      @xdkfpjacob 6 років тому +1

      ikr

  • @thatguy1056
    @thatguy1056 4 роки тому +92

    “Let’s do a side by side comparison” *zooms in on one at a time and flicks screen around a lot*

  • @unlokia
    @unlokia 7 років тому +55

    I must confess, embarrassingly, I *nearly* did what many do, and nearly clicked "dislike" ... but then the calm, gentle voice of reason and patience said _"watch the whole video, don't be foolish"_ ... and it's a good job I did - what you described are aspects of typography which I'd never deeply considered, but had always observed. Thank you, Sir, God bless you :)
    You are superb, and have just gained another well-earned subscriber.
    Matthew, England.

  • @ohno-wi1vb
    @ohno-wi1vb 7 років тому +484

    the “perfect” one looks so much worse ahaha

    • @madisonxyz9887
      @madisonxyz9887 7 років тому +10

      Greta Master of the Galaxy I liked the colors better😕

    • @RCmies
      @RCmies 7 років тому +2

      I don't know why but because of the yellow it looks way emptier somehow

    • @0-Kirby-0
      @0-Kirby-0 7 років тому +3

      I'm an autist. I fucking love the perfect one.

    • @childishtombino1275
      @childishtombino1275 7 років тому +4

      Do you actually mean autist or do you mean artist?

    • @emilydioptase
      @emilydioptase 7 років тому

      ターニャ Both

  • @madisonxyz9887
    @madisonxyz9887 7 років тому +56

    And here I thought the problem was the yellow being to small and equal to the rest of the colors. I like it being not a perfect circle but when you changed the yellow size, I like it a lot better. It just looks so lopsided with the red leaning on the yellow.

  • @-SUM1-
    @-SUM1- 7 років тому +4

    To be more specific, it's because the width of the blue part of the G just before it turns to the left is too thick on a circular one. You can see where they've made it the same thickness as the rest of the G in the official one.

  • @mohamednaflan4361
    @mohamednaflan4361 3 роки тому +1

    this is why learning just the tools isn't enough.

  • @RenaldoXhahu
    @RenaldoXhahu 7 років тому +636

    THANK YOU! I cringe every time when I see posts on how the logo is wrong lol

    • @AppleWatchCenter
      @AppleWatchCenter 7 років тому

      Renaldo Xhahu ikr 😂

    • @localcrackhead2904
      @localcrackhead2904 7 років тому +3

      Why tf would you cringe to a fucking logo? I'm pretty sure people only cringe when something is awkward..

    • @lordofbuns5636
      @lordofbuns5636 7 років тому +5

      Argf your attempt to argue makes me cringe

    • @itsblack2321
      @itsblack2321 7 років тому +18

      He cringes when he sees posts about the logo, not the logo itself.

    • @pratikrane149
      @pratikrane149 7 років тому +1

      Argf, He is probably a designer, so for them it is common to feel uncomfortable when there are silly mistakes in logos/designs. Tho the mistake in this video wasn't a mistake actually, google just did that intently.

  • @tashasimone9008
    @tashasimone9008 7 років тому +281

    Very interesting observations. At first I was annoyed with the new logo, but it's making more sense. It's crazy how such a geometric font like futura isn't perfectly symmetrical

    • @loutubesing3213
      @loutubesing3213 7 років тому +12

      Optical vs geometric design can be very interesting sometimes

    • @jprice_
      @jprice_ 7 років тому +2

      Holy shit that's obnoxious. Gotta hustle, huh?

    • @madisonxyz9887
      @madisonxyz9887 7 років тому +1

      Md Abdus Sobur go away.

    • @ayushFos
      @ayushFos 7 років тому +4

      Tasha Simone it's is G not a fucking circle.
      It should not necessarily be a circle

    • @tashasimone9008
      @tashasimone9008 7 років тому +3

      Ayush Kumar yeah of course it’s a G, but futura was designed as a “geometric” font which means round letterforms (Os, Cs, capital Gs) are theoretically perfect circular forms. But as Will demonstrates, the font designer didn’t make it just perfect because of optical balance. I just thought it was interesting and felt like mentioning it *shrug*

  • @RazinShaikh
    @RazinShaikh 7 років тому +1149

    Why was this recommended to me??

    • @bilegtbattsooj4524
      @bilegtbattsooj4524 7 років тому

      Razin Shaikh i shared a pic of this on facebook and this popped up

    • @tromino2598
      @tromino2598 7 років тому +1

      I don't know.

    • @YonatanAvhar
      @YonatanAvhar 7 років тому +12

      Cuz its awesome

    • @YonatanAvhar
      @YonatanAvhar 7 років тому +9

      And if you comment on a video youtube counts it as interaction and recommends more similar ones

    • @pratikrane149
      @pratikrane149 7 років тому +1

      Razin Shaikh, cause it's trending.

  • @rtytuyi
    @rtytuyi 6 років тому +19

    To be honest... I absolutely love this and love google even more for this. There's something perfect about creating something imperfect. This whole theory goes for both music(sound) and logo designs. Thank you for making this video.

  • @tom_the_jaffa_muncher9576
    @tom_the_jaffa_muncher9576 7 років тому +65

    YOU COULD PLAY A DRINKING GAME: DRINK EVERYTIME HE SAYS "Optically balanced" or "not just mathematics"

    • @jude.niranjan
      @jude.niranjan 3 роки тому

      Everything is gonna look optically perfect then.

  • @poi24b3
    @poi24b3 7 років тому +171

    This is the G spot those nerds will ever find.

    • @MouseGoat
      @MouseGoat 7 років тому +19

      Those nerds? Google was invented by nerds to the nerds, so thats a weird thing to say.
      Also now days it's the nerds that a getting laid, as its the nerds that run the world now.

    • @iggy_zuckerbaeck
      @iggy_zuckerbaeck 7 років тому +1

      correction, the capitalist the nerds work for*

    • @theRPGmaster
      @theRPGmaster 7 років тому +2

      Disses nerds, can't even spell "never".

    • @RivenEnjoyer6897
      @RivenEnjoyer6897 7 років тому +1

      It's a joke bro

    • @ngkstudio4845
      @ngkstudio4845 7 років тому

      steve vansteenbrugge why bother explaining it to these guys. I was laughing at the joke till I saw the other replies.

  • @MohamedAchraf
    @MohamedAchraf 7 років тому +329

    Nice One Will !!

  • @kahlcium2
    @kahlcium2 7 років тому +117

    going through the comments is such a wild ride huh

  • @Drop3dlvl3
    @Drop3dlvl3 7 років тому +1

    You should’ve put the symmetrical logo beside the other letters so people could actually see how much it overshoots to the right. I think some people weren’t able to perceive it.

  • @gochem3013
    @gochem3013 6 років тому

    Google (1998-2015): We can help you to search it.
    Google (2015-Now): WE WILL ARREST YOU!

  • @lgktube
    @lgktube 7 років тому +294

    For me a logo doesn’t have to look „perfect“. It should fit to its brand. And those weird lines inside of the „G“ somehow symbolizes to me the unconventionality of Google.

    • @falconmm1614
      @falconmm1614 7 років тому +18

      Lars / LGK May I question your strange ,,quotes?“

    • @lgktube
      @lgktube 7 років тому +19

      FalconM&M What do you „mean“?

    • @atouloupas
      @atouloupas 7 років тому +16

      Lars / LGK I think that they use quotes like „that” in German, and it looks quite ugly imho. Did I get it right, are you indeed German?

    • @lgktube
      @lgktube 7 років тому +16

      Απόστολος Τουλούπας Yes, that’s true, I am German. My iPad keyboard creates those quotes automatically when I actually just type “. 😉

    • @edinhass9189
      @edinhass9189 7 років тому +8

      Απόστολος Τουλούπας it's used like that in almost all of Europe..

  • @kunalbelamkar
    @kunalbelamkar 7 років тому +4

    I honestly don't see a difference between Will Paterson and Ed Sheeran! :P

  • @bitraboj722
    @bitraboj722 7 років тому +124

    This is some googleception

  • @saraangel6696
    @saraangel6696 7 років тому

    There's a reason people study this for years... I wouldn't have noticed any of that if you had not pointed it out. Really cool video!

  • @koyaaanisquatsi
    @koyaaanisquatsi 5 років тому +1

    wow this explains so much. Im an illustrator, not a graphic designer, but the way it explains why what we perceive with a naked eye is more important than being mathematically perfect... interesting concept indeed

  • @LARAUJO_0
    @LARAUJO_0 7 років тому +417

    The only thing that really bothers me about it is how unbalanced the colours are

    • @madisonxyz9887
      @madisonxyz9887 7 років тому +3

      Me too.

    • @madisonxyz9887
      @madisonxyz9887 7 років тому +5

      It looks so lopsided

    • @Backenzahnkleber
      @Backenzahnkleber 7 років тому +50

      Yellow is a stronger colour in our mind and green the weakest
      It makes sense

    • @Centricsts
      @Centricsts 7 років тому +1

      LARAUJO nice profile pic, James is a sexy little boy

    • @Smartercow
      @Smartercow 7 років тому +24

      A comment by Beate Zeuner above - "They made the yellow smaller, because yellow is a very bright color, so in our perception it is stronger than the other colors. There is nothing wrong with a basically yellow logo, but I think google wanted the colors all to have the same perceived visual weight. That's basic color theory, you can read in any book about colors."

  • @BenvanderWalt
    @BenvanderWalt 7 років тому +550

    I made a video "fixing" everything wrong with the new Google logo, and it just looks out of place...

    • @1ax
      @1ax 7 років тому +4

      HOW DO YOU NOT HAVE MORE SUBS????

    • @Hunter-lj9qq
      @Hunter-lj9qq 7 років тому +1

      Ben Thunder ok

    • @Auddsi564
      @Auddsi564 7 років тому +65

      its literally IN this video lol

    • @Akira1G
      @Akira1G 7 років тому

      it does...

    • @iconoclasttastic9258
      @iconoclasttastic9258 7 років тому +10

      Perhaps you should watch videos to the end before making assumptions - your behavious reminds me a lot of the muppets making assumptons that the logo is 'wrong'. It demonstrates immaturity not knowledge. It's easy to criticise. Try offering your opponent the respect of understanding their position before shooting off half-cocked.

  • @poprange
    @poprange 7 років тому +524

    Well, its not a perfect circle because its a fucking letter G, not a circle...

    • @wiltersens
      @wiltersens 7 років тому +47

      there's a difference when the letter happens to be a logo

    • @kristiansmith5298
      @kristiansmith5298 7 років тому +28

      is there? its still a letter G

    • @mrst0ne495
      @mrst0ne495 7 років тому

      point

    • @Antiganos
      @Antiganos 7 років тому +6

      Gabriel Maranhão Watch the video until the end

    • @mikael9325
      @mikael9325 7 років тому +12

      Gabriel Maranhão watch the whole video dumb fuck

  • @error.418
    @error.418 6 років тому

    All the articles that came out saying it was wrong were really bothering me, thanks for addressing the intentionality in the logo and the basics of typographic design. Well done!

  • @end-ai-media
    @end-ai-media 7 років тому

    Subscribed. I'm a communication design student at Otago Polytechnic, and you just managed to make my youtube viewing some AWESOME research and homework into Logo design! :)

  • @Alppuccino
    @Alppuccino 7 років тому +422

    It's a G, not a fucking circle lol

    • @dxthakid4727
      @dxthakid4727 7 років тому +25

      Alppuccino | FX if you take time to actually watch the video instead of looking like a total idiot your life would be a little bit better

    • @Alppuccino
      @Alppuccino 7 років тому +49

      Eh? I'm just inputting my view on the situation, nor was I disagreeing with Will about it. I literally just stated "It's a G, not a fucking circle" not towards anybody or anything. I'm sorry if you were offended but maybe if you could understand my intellectual sentence structures and use of pronouns then _your_ life would be much better. Thanks.

    • @kys2067
      @kys2067 7 років тому +1

      Alppuccino | FX Second opinion here, please stop.

    • @madisonxyz9887
      @madisonxyz9887 7 років тому +5

      Leave a like for no reason Please I watched the video, his statement still works had watched it all. Really, him saying that is like he's agreeing.

    • @madisonxyz9887
      @madisonxyz9887 7 років тому

      Leave a like for no reason Please If you take the time to not be a snob, maybe you would have been able to understand that.

  • @skepticmoderate5790
    @skepticmoderate5790 7 років тому +63

    Thank you for saying this! Every time I see one of those Google logo memes I cringe a little inside because I know the typographic principles behind it.

  • @leoLorenzi
    @leoLorenzi 7 років тому +31

    Do A Tutorial on Optical Stablization

    • @languagepepe2855
      @languagepepe2855 7 років тому +2

      he can't even explain it... how's he gonna do a tutorial?
      he just said "stabilize", "optical stabilization", and "balance it out" 50+ times >:(

  • @xpez9694
    @xpez9694 6 років тому

    the reason the crossbar in the E is higher is to align with the other letters x-height. A good rule of thumb: The most legible typefaces used to set pages within books usually employ a typeface with a large x-height. This increases legibility and causes less strain on the eyes which makes reading a 200 page book much easier.

  • @monteb6276
    @monteb6276 7 років тому +1

    As someone who likes math and has light autism and slight OCD this is so triggering

  • @Joxus
    @Joxus 7 років тому +4

    I don't know that I like this whole optical balance thing... Actually......no ive changed my mind this is very informative and quite cool

  • @viciousnutella
    @viciousnutella 7 років тому +52

    I don't see anything wrong with it. People are just overreacting, such major bandwagons

    • @SmTab
      @SmTab 6 років тому

      Ppp

  • @tylerm9722
    @tylerm9722 7 років тому +5

    “Optically compensate”. I have to steal that.

  • @GhoztCowboy
    @GhoztCowboy 4 роки тому

    YOUR FACIAL EXPRESSION WHEN THE CIRCLE DIDN'T FIT KILLED ME HAHAHA

  • @marksmithwas12
    @marksmithwas12 7 років тому +1

    You should do a video on the Pokémon Moon logo, it's soo good! It's an icon of a moon within a moon within a moon and utilises negative space flawlessly. As for Pokémon Sun, I haven't stared at it long enough to see what it has to offer

  • @jasonchen4831
    @jasonchen4831 7 років тому +7

    It's like that to piss people off.

    • @DanJackielz
      @DanJackielz 7 років тому

      why would it piss people off?

    • @MrDetox2u
      @MrDetox2u 7 років тому

      Feri Some people get annoyed when something is wrong

  • @arentf2
    @arentf2 7 років тому +48

    I can't find anyone complimenting this video, besides people defending the video from people who didn't watch the whole video, guess I'll be the first? Tnx for explaining all this 'optical balance' and all that, I actually taught it was unnecessary, keep it up my dude! :D

  • @Khushwant-Singh
    @Khushwant-Singh 7 років тому +56

    The only thing 'wrong' with the video is its title. You could've saved 1K dislikes if you would've chosen something else as a title. Liked.

    • @loafy8532
      @loafy8532 7 років тому +33

      The title isn't wrong, what is wrong are the people who jump to conclusions without watching the video itself

    • @tahneethompson6012
      @tahneethompson6012 7 років тому

      Eskilo no hot cognition isnt wrong its unwanted and isnt needed but its not wrong

    • @gabrieleiro4181
      @gabrieleiro4181 6 років тому

      He could've saved dislikes by choosing another title but would he get as many views?

    • @tiberiu5284
      @tiberiu5284 6 років тому +1

      Gabrieleiro If only big numbers are important for you, you are just a superficial dude that can't promote his work without false advertising

    • @gabrieleiro4181
      @gabrieleiro4181 6 років тому +5

      People who came here, read the title, watched only the first few minutes, and gave it a thumbs down are people who don't agree with what the title suggests. This video is not for them because these people already know and agree with all of what was explained in it. It doesn't matter if they give a thumbs down, because this video aimmed people who agree with the title and tries to explain why they are wrong by educating them on some design concepts.
      By changing the title you would please people who downvoted the video. But they were never the target

  • @crowdozer
    @crowdozer 7 років тому

    Good video. This is why companies employ focus groups and not just advice from people who completed a graphics design course at a community college.

  • @totallysxmmyyt6787
    @totallysxmmyyt6787 3 роки тому +1

    Well done, I'm reminded of lessons I learned from working with my typography mentor from Yale, at that time the process was
    done by hand. My students will love this presentation.

  • @Riiisuu
    @Riiisuu 7 років тому +14

    “Mathematically it’s wrong but optically it’s correct”...

  • @Zeldakostv
    @Zeldakostv 7 років тому +16

    Ok i agree the non perfect one looks better, but i still dont see why they dont match the red and green ends. That looked fine in your version

    • @jinjunliu2401
      @jinjunliu2401 7 років тому +3

      McKaos it's nice to have some asymmetries imo

    • @bigdog5
      @bigdog5 7 років тому

      Makes it look more personal

    • @aandre311
      @aandre311 7 років тому +10

      because color weight, yellow is a very lightweight color and if you increase the area too much it will get lost with the background thus messing the readability, since it will mess with the open space of the G which should be on the right not on the left so it read as a G, also that's why they have the green at the bottom cause is a solid color it acts as a base, but blue is more solid than green tho thats why they use it on the right to compensate for the yellow on the left and to define the arm of letter G. you should consider turning the logo to grey scale so you can see the values.

  • @chance3611
    @chance3611 7 років тому +34

    Personally I love the logo, yeah it has some flaws but I think it feels like their style, great vid.

  • @tetrahedral1521
    @tetrahedral1521 7 років тому +1

    Wow, to be honest this is the first of your videos, or any typography videos, I have seen where I am generously impressed with how much you are educated on the subject and craft, lots of respect to you and your work!

  • @Techn0forlife
    @Techn0forlife 7 років тому

    1920: Maybe there'll be flying cars in the future.
    2017: *this*

  • @PoloZ34
    @PoloZ34 7 років тому +8

    Wow only if I knew this when making bo2 emblems with letters, it never looked quite right

    • @fastndd
      @fastndd 7 років тому

      that's why i never used letters for my own logos haha ;p

  • @gracefulslumber8441
    @gracefulslumber8441 6 років тому +5

    This was super awesome and interesting! I learned a lot!

    • @Kai_Jason_Lee
      @Kai_Jason_Lee 6 років тому

      You can't be serious!
      How stupid do you need to be to think thats educational?
      You are a bloody discrace!!

  • @EdwardBliffin
    @EdwardBliffin 7 років тому +17

    Plot Twist: An intern really did mess it up, and they didnt notice until it was published!

  • @jude.niranjan
    @jude.niranjan 3 роки тому +2

    Mathematically wrong, optically perfect.

  • @nienke7713
    @nienke7713 7 років тому

    I must say I find your mathematically recreated logo much better looking than the actual logo, but that might just be me being odd

  • @richardhead8264
    @richardhead8264 7 років тому +3

    _Spatial Distribution Perception_
    Rather than saying it's not mathematical, it's probably more precise to say that our sense of perception is comprised of more-sophisticated criteria than primitive geometric constructs.
    RIP OCD LOL

  • @KevinPlaysGuitar
    @KevinPlaysGuitar 7 років тому +30

    Interesting! I learn something new everyday. :)

  • @jaredswartz9149
    @jaredswartz9149 7 років тому +98

    I watched a 10 minutes ad for you

    • @prabhathk6175
      @prabhathk6175 6 років тому +2

      jared swartz I regret I used adblocker

    • @naumsei6221
      @naumsei6221 6 років тому +3

      I use adblocker, but it is OFF on youtube, cuz I like youtubers...

    • @prabhathk6175
      @prabhathk6175 6 років тому

      People wont use adblockers unless ads become less distracting and comes with sound in mute by default. Ads in the middle and and end of a video are bearable. But, at the starting of the video ! Urgghh

    • @prabhathk6175
      @prabhathk6175 6 років тому

      I use adblocker on my Pc as well as on my android Device

    • @jordanaragon3732
      @jordanaragon3732 6 років тому

      Ken B how do you get the adblocker

  • @sheepphic
    @sheepphic 7 років тому +1

    This was a really interesting video! Just so you know, this is more about type design than typography. Type design is the creation of typefaces, while typography relates to how text looks on the page, including what font is chosen, but also where the text breaks, how the lines are spaced, etc.

  • @iceypumpkinhead
    @iceypumpkinhead 7 років тому

    Google made 2 phones and a vr headset, meanwhile this guy is concerned about google's logo being uneven

    • @phephemigi
      @phephemigi 7 років тому

      Iceypumpkin head he isn't "concerned" about it. He spends most of the video defending the logo. The first two and a half minutes were just for context.

  • @Grabster
    @Grabster 7 років тому +6

    Is my logo ok? :D

    • @flicks12378
      @flicks12378 7 років тому

      No its horrible...jk its swell

    • @loafy8532
      @loafy8532 7 років тому +1

      Minimalistic... i like that

  • @niftythelynx
    @niftythelynx 7 років тому +19

    Is this the reason that when I center text it doesn't always look like it's centered so I move it off to the side because the L is open etc

  • @davehudson5399
    @davehudson5399 7 років тому +305

    O C D

    • @davehudson5399
      @davehudson5399 7 років тому +1

      I have it myself (no hate)

    • @MouseGoat
      @MouseGoat 7 років тому +6

      when you realize the letters you use to write that, a also "visually optimized"

    • @madisonxyz9887
      @madisonxyz9887 7 років тому +1

      Nekogami-Crystal o.O 😂😂😂 Nice catch.

    • @BelatedBlade
      @BelatedBlade 7 років тому +2

      O C D

    • @bottlecap6169
      @bottlecap6169 7 років тому +21

      You don't have ocd you just get annoyed at things which aren't symmetrical

  • @theblindgamer101
    @theblindgamer101 7 років тому

    It's pretty interesting that they did the same thing on ancient Greece temples. The columns where often buldged in the middle ever so slightly so that it looked perfectly straight to the human eye.

  • @jeansbeans2496
    @jeansbeans2496 7 років тому

    I was actually messing around with letter logos in illustrator and i discovered that very recently about letters being optically balanced. It was very interesting that i bumped into this video just a couple days later

  • @volita4792
    @volita4792 6 років тому +3

    I didn’t notice it,
    You made me develop OCD now.

  • @vinitdoke
    @vinitdoke 7 років тому +5

    I cannot believe in my eyes, literally

  • @marekfoolforchrist
    @marekfoolforchrist 7 років тому +4

    9th comment HI WILL FROM DISCORD!

    • @Mickaleb
      @Mickaleb 7 років тому

      Jake from State Farm!

  • @ColinJWiens
    @ColinJWiens 7 років тому

    My guess would've been that asymmetry gave it the subtle personality that google tries to achieve, but your perspective made a lot more sense

  • @jejethegundu
    @jejethegundu 7 років тому

    sometimes what *looks* perfect isn't actually perfect and what *is* perfect doesn't look like it

  • @DnaDesigns
    @DnaDesigns 7 років тому +18

    dope shit mahn
    love your video's

  • @nyalakanmerahmu
    @nyalakanmerahmu 7 років тому +4

    is there math behind this?

    • @mattlamp8331
      @mattlamp8331 7 років тому +1

      not necessarily, optical adjustments, like in typography are made with the eyes, of course you have some guidelines, but ultimately is your eyes that make the decision. it has to be perceived as a perfect circle, not be a mathematically perfect one necessarily

  • @jonismithy0012
    @jonismithy0012 6 років тому +3

    It’s a logo. It doesn’t need to make standards. It’s stupid though. Like it doesn’t have to be a proper circle. Get real

    •  6 років тому +1

      Watch the video

  • @jonsealartist
    @jonsealartist 7 років тому

    Big point that's being missed is that from a branding standpoint you make word and letter marks slightly off because 1) that insures trademark and 2) makes it easier to distinguish copycats though the second reason has become a bit moot with recent technology, it is still very much part of the tradition.

  • @Bry10022
    @Bry10022 3 роки тому +1

    This was all intentional as stated by the company. As if it were perfectly circular, it'd give the illusion of looking imperfect…

  • @Catag
    @Catag 7 років тому +4

    How do you get that motion blur tho.

  • @Falcarious
    @Falcarious 7 років тому +21

    I like the colors on the "stabilized" version more, but the shape of it just looks off.

    • @jinjunliu2401
      @jinjunliu2401 7 років тому +1

      Falcarious little asymmetries are beautiful

    • @maksymillian
      @maksymillian 6 років тому

      Falcarious wtf but the colours are the same on both of them

  • @AnasKhan-oh1ns
    @AnasKhan-oh1ns 7 років тому +6

    When he made the colours even sizes it didn't look that weird

    • @SuperSmashTails
      @SuperSmashTails 7 років тому

      But then it would be just a "Simon says"-logo and not unique.

  • @metakarp_
    @metakarp_ 7 років тому +2

    Personally, I preferred the colour-blocks the way you made them. But I've always been one for symmetrical designs. The shape of the G, however, I completely agree with you about the whole optical stabilisation.

  • @Dasky14
    @Dasky14 6 років тому

    I can't get past the fact that the fixed version just looks much better to me.

  • @zaydenmanton650
    @zaydenmanton650 7 років тому +4

    It a fucking a G😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @Milklover1131
    @Milklover1131 7 років тому +78

    i hope they do it on purpose

    • @nareal_chutney
      @nareal_chutney 7 років тому +25

      lilkhalim watch the whole video! It is made on purpose!

    • @pecoliky8793
      @pecoliky8793 7 років тому +19

      you fucking idiot, watch before you comment.

    • @CorporateShill
      @CorporateShill 6 років тому +2

      RAYMNDD
      Your second half of your comment contradicts your point

  • @rudhisoegiarto7406
    @rudhisoegiarto7406 7 років тому +5

    Brilliant will!

  • @AlexYorim
    @AlexYorim 7 років тому +1

    Well, *Gee*, for two years, I always thought that it was a perfect full circle. It's basically a nightmare for some designers, or people diagnosed with OCD. Me? The now aware cat likes it even more. You learn something more interesting everyday.
    Speaking of logo changes, will you make a video for the new Patreon logo?

  • @elravomastero2566
    @elravomastero2566 7 років тому +2

    Thank you for this! I learned a lot!

  • @adolfodef
    @adolfodef 7 років тому +2

    There is another thing: Spiral

  • @scythecp8209
    @scythecp8209 7 років тому +5

    What is life?

  • @patrickb3032
    @patrickb3032 7 років тому +10

    The perfect one looks better IMO, atleast the part where the colors are evenly distributed. They can keep the original reduced circle shape, just fix that tiny yellow. It doesnt look right being smaller than the other colors.

    • @OfflineCreative
      @OfflineCreative 6 років тому +2

      You might not "think" its bad, but most brains will find it bothersome, even when you "think" its ok.
      These things have been tested and studied, and the majority of people will find the optically balanced logos/designs, more visually pleasing.

    • @OfflineCreative
      @OfflineCreative 6 років тому

      And most important thing is , we dont know why the designer and the company decided to make it that size, you dont. We dont have enough context to say why they used the colors in that size.
      We desing for our clients needs, not for our desires.

  • @nikolaynikiforovDXC
    @nikolaynikiforovDXC 3 місяці тому

    Great explanation!
    BTW, these optical adjustments were made even in ancient architecture::
    The Temple of Aphaia illustrates the Ancient Greek practice of using optical refinementsto counteract optical illusions. Ancient Greek architects designed their temples to be highly ordered, mathematically perfect. However, they realized that once these perfectly designed temples were constructed, optical illusions would occur that caused these temples to appear imperfect. As a result, architects began to make adjustments to their perfect temples. These optical refinements made the temples less perfect technically but combated the optical illusions in such a way that made the temples appear perfect once again.

  • @baconaterlover5399
    @baconaterlover5399 7 років тому

    What I wanna know is why someone looked at the new logo and thought "you know, I don't think that's a perfect circle" and then had to check