I feel like regional and ideological Micronational organizations/alliances could work in theory, but most suffer from the same problems (inactivity, no organizational structure, and a lack of knowledge about other members, etc).
Well, then, simply build them on sustaining pragmatic method, thus ensuring the production of prosperous elements embedded in organization and alliance. Most simply do it in regard to fame, and that they only WANT an adequate return in what was put into it (with the rejection of mutualism which is manifestly needed for an alliance). With pragmatic method it would significantly diminish one-side benefit and increase mutualism that is set-in-stone ‘Benjamin mess’. I think that with such a multiformity of alliances and organizations established, they therefore create an environment precisely in the eyes of competition (e.g., battling policies, actions, etc)
We joined the terrestia war just bc 2 of our allies were fighting them so might as well in solice, the only boots on the ground wars weve ever fought are civil wars
im gonna make a comment, i'd say that most "micronations" these days (ran by children and teens, generally) dont actually work on things of the sort of economy and infastructure, as they are *kids* . they have society built for them, they dont need to go out of their way to add on to it for themselves. if a micronation is really commited it may be able to constructing wooden structures, possibly 3D printing some sort of coin for a basic economy, but they dont really go as far as making an economy as far as a UN recognized, war fighting, internationally important nation would, as, again, they are kids. they have parents to fund them most of the time. they have a hard enough time likely getting things of the sort of equipment, hard to get boots on the ground *ANYWHERE* cuz' they wont have logistics (cuz' kids), and generally they have a hard enough time funding themselves at all. to be fair even a flag costs $30-40 USD to get off of the most reliable custom-flag website i know. so its generally not easy to get buildings, or an economy. oh and, about the agriculture point you made, again, kids, why farm when you've got a local supermarket to stop by. its hard to maintain crops, and impossible almost for most micronation owners to even afford livestock. real quick i'd also like to share my opinion on boots-on-the-ground wars. its likely hard to get troops our far, as i already went over, most states wont have proper logistics, and i understand any nation opting out of war. though, i'd also say that this "opting out of war" is more of "neutrality", and such concepts have failed nations (real ones) in the past. my advice to a "by logic neutral" nation, have a home defence force. or your nation will be a formality. other than that, your other points are more than valid, and i fully support them. hopefully my constructive critisim is useful for further speeches. (:
You are significantly wrong for the most part, with resonation with the claim stating an array of factors that diminish productivity (such as poor funding) is completely an overstatement as micronational preference in “productivity” isn’t big-hand relation of macronational preference. REMEMBER, these are micronations, and with this distinction they will evidently have land unfavorable in crop or livestock. With such a claim almost expecting this manifestation embedded in micronational conduct is almost faulty analogy fallacy.
Im 12 i know about agriculture constitution law infrastructure ideology i could go into depth about these things but im not gana do that cuz im not spending 30 minutes on this comment
I completely Agree with you
This felt like a Documentary…
great job on this
Completely agreeing with you. 🦆🦆
This is why i dropped all of my conflicts
my brother who is the Prime Minister Owenn DP and he knows polictics but i also agree with u
I feel like regional and ideological Micronational organizations/alliances could work in theory, but most suffer from the same problems (inactivity, no organizational structure, and a lack of knowledge about other members, etc).
Yea, basically that’s why the horizon accord kinda collapsed
A main member left
It was inactive
Well, then, simply build them on sustaining pragmatic method, thus ensuring the production of prosperous elements embedded in organization and alliance.
Most simply do it in regard to fame, and that they only WANT an adequate return in what was put into it (with the rejection of mutualism which is manifestly needed for an alliance). With pragmatic method it would significantly diminish one-side benefit and increase mutualism that is set-in-stone ‘Benjamin mess’.
I think that with such a multiformity of alliances and organizations established, they therefore create an environment precisely in the eyes of competition (e.g., battling policies, actions, etc)
@@ConfusedKey-ec7dkno hablo inglés
We joined the terrestia war just bc 2 of our allies were fighting them so might as well in solice, the only boots on the ground wars weve ever fought are civil wars
Does Knifes count a milatary weapon?
@@Alexijiski_Raforjislavija Mele combat is outdated but yes
I personally count them, seeing as they're really the only military weapon in our possession that has any capability to, yknow
Parava was not mentioned
I am a new Micronation
@@PalmlandGovernment Welcome to the community!
im a digal nation like on a screen. did i invent that?
@@izpi-t4f If you want to be a Legit Nation you need to have some form of Land in my opinion. And no you are not the first person to be digital.
yk im a "nation" and u included me in your picture which is odd, so like are we starting to have like problems??
@@Fallonia555 I jus picked nations flags I had on my computer lol
@@QuackersKingdomGovernment LOL thats so funny
im gonna make a comment, i'd say that most "micronations" these days (ran by children and teens, generally) dont actually work on things of the sort of economy and infastructure, as they are *kids* . they have society built for them, they dont need to go out of their way to add on to it for themselves. if a micronation is really commited it may be able to constructing wooden structures, possibly 3D printing some sort of coin for a basic economy, but they dont really go as far as making an economy as far as a UN recognized, war fighting, internationally important nation would, as, again, they are kids. they have parents to fund them most of the time. they have a hard enough time likely getting things of the sort of equipment, hard to get boots on the ground *ANYWHERE* cuz' they wont have logistics (cuz' kids), and generally they have a hard enough time funding themselves at all. to be fair even a flag costs $30-40 USD to get off of the most reliable custom-flag website i know. so its generally not easy to get buildings, or an economy. oh and, about the agriculture point you made, again, kids, why farm when you've got a local supermarket to stop by. its hard to maintain crops, and impossible almost for most micronation owners to even afford livestock.
real quick i'd also like to share my opinion on boots-on-the-ground wars. its likely hard to get troops our far, as i already went over, most states wont have proper logistics, and i understand any nation opting out of war. though, i'd also say that this "opting out of war" is more of "neutrality", and such concepts have failed nations (real ones) in the past. my advice to a "by logic neutral" nation, have a home defence force. or your nation will be a formality.
other than that, your other points are more than valid, and i fully support them. hopefully my constructive critisim is useful for further speeches. (:
You are significantly wrong for the most part, with resonation with the claim stating an array of factors that diminish productivity (such as poor funding) is completely an overstatement as micronational preference in “productivity” isn’t big-hand relation of macronational preference.
REMEMBER, these are micronations, and with this distinction they will evidently have land unfavorable in crop or livestock. With such a claim almost expecting this manifestation embedded in micronational conduct is almost faulty analogy fallacy.
I love the hasty generalization
@@ConfusedKey-ec7dk literally most of these things are ran by kids I don't see a point in arguing about this.
Im 12 i know about agriculture constitution law infrastructure ideology i could go into depth about these things but im not gana do that cuz im not spending 30 minutes on this comment
@@Kingdom_of_Valdonia As long as you know how to run a nation you are fine. Im only 13 and I plan to have this nation grow up with me.
@QuackersKingdomGovernment same and once im maybe 22 or 19 ill fund mine much better