Such an incredible contribution to this camera and helping people understand its capabilities. Thanks for doing all this work and presenting it so well. Subscribing to this channel.
HI Maarten, your video contained all the information I need to know on the video capabilities of this camera. Thank you so much for making and posting it.
Excellent video, however, my being new to video production, it has demonstrated the level of knowledge that must be obtained prior to fully understanding the GFX100s and video production generally. It has left me feeling like a I am a knuckle dragger! A shortened version for gumbies (like myself) would be good.
You made me feel I have made the right decision at getting this camera. I have a question about powering the camera externally, is that a power bank you're using? if so what would you recommend? Thank you indeed!
thanks Maarten. I still can't make my mind up about getting this camera. It would have to replace both ny GFX50R for (landscape) stills and my X-T3 (and all is lenses) for video. Decisions decisions.
I’ve had a gfx 100 for about two months and I’m now testing out the video modes. I’m curious to know your raw video workflow in Final Cut. It’s definitely different than when I had the s1h. The 100 raw video looks rec 709 on import instead of looking like FLog. It’s showing Flog on the Ninja while recording though. No Luts are set to be applied on the Ninja either (except for monitoring)
Good that you've managed to configure the Ninja so that you're getting a clean F-Log RAW. That was confusing. This sounds like a good suggestion for a video? Personally, I found that making the exposure/colour adjustments manually served me best.
@@MaartenHeilbron I would love for you to make a workflow video, lol. I’ve been trying to get into the video field (pt pro photographer for 20+ years) for the past year or so and editing is kicking my butt. Maybe I should just out source it. Thanks for you reply. It’s so little video related gfx 100 content around and your video was by far the best. Keep doing what you do 👏🏾
Does it have the ability to digitally zoom into that massive 100 MP sensor when recording 4K? This could be really useful as there is so much resolution and sensor size for shooting videos! Thanks for the video.
Thanks for this video. I have one question. How do I configure my short cut setting so I can change white balance manually while I see the scene I shoot?
Thank you for your kind words and the alert. That setting doesn't always "stick" when I set it during the upload process. I've disabled mid-roll ads again, and again, my apologies.
3 роки тому
@@MaartenHeilbron It truly did not bother me. I just wanted to informe you.
@@MaartenHeilbron I doubt anyone would mind if you monetized, relatively your channel is of a higher standard so monetization wouldn't be a distraction or deterrent id imagine.
You can add mid roles if you want and should not feel you can’t. You produce high quality videos with tons of information. If it helps you make profit while continuing to produce the great videos you already do then use them. I am not sure why people get upset about this. You are providing free information and it takes a ton of work for you behind the scenes. Whatever you feel is best for you but I am thankful for the time you put in to create these great videos.
@@MaartenHeilbron the key aberrations did give me pause. I am between the GFX 100s and the Lumix S1H. I'm finding the GFX may be for more specific circumstances where as the S1H better all around.
If Fujiflm can make GFX 100S (medium format with IBIS) similar size/weight as FF, Fujiflm should able make X-T4 (APS-C) similar size/weight as M4/3. Wish ultra lightweight X-T5.
X-S10 hasn't WR and use PASM dials. IMO Fujiflm should make X-S20 with WR and Fujilike dials in $999; X-T4 Mark II with dual processor (like Nikon) and built-in heatsink (like Sigma fp) for unlimited 4K video shooting. It is because X-T4 price too close to mid-range FF. Canon RP (FF) only need $999.
please do a tutorial how to edit and save your own film simulation for stills and film on gfx100s its a big mess in the menu too complicated and you will be the first to do it no body has donet yet the pdf manual is a mess
As I explained in the video, I decided to demonstrate the settings in this camera by using the full cinema configuration - using the DCI 17x9 aspect. That means there's a slight letterbox if you're viewing full screen on a 16x9 screen. Although your screen may, UA-cam does not have a standard size or ratio.
@@MaartenHeilbron Hi Maarten, I hear you, but I still don't get it. Why squish everything down with black bars when the viewing audience is on UA-cam. Actually, for a system not confined by a physical screen, such as on a browser window, UA-cam does have a default standard ratio of 16:9 ... obviously chosen as this is the modern standard digital display (TV) ratio (based on an a-political compromise of cinema sizes, which conversely, don't appear to have a single standard ratio). Some phone companies etc try to sell more gadgets by trying to mess with the modern standard. If you're releasing your UA-cam video at the cinema, let me know, but I'm not paying (and I'm smuggling popcorn in from the supermarket) but for now your video has gone straight to UA-cam. Ok, maybe you're trying to demonstrate something, (I'm still not sure what), but I'm not for UA-camrs shrinking things down (or stealing/wasting viewing area) with black bars because somehow that's part of a formula for making something of great "cinematographic" quality. Cinema legends never mentioned that secret of black bars in interviews! In fact the intended canvas is filled up in the cinema, so why is it different for the intended home canvas? (... now for the 24 fps crippling eye sore scenario ... another day ...).
@@Paul_Rohde Clearly, repeating your comments after I've provided my rationale indicates that you don't hear me. Why is your tolerance for those who don't agree with you so low? Why do you find my reply so insufficient? Please read my reply again, as it includes the reasons I chose to use DCI 17x9 to demonstrate this camera.
@@MaartenHeilbron Hi Maarten, you asked me a question, was that literal or rhetorical? If it was literal, I'll do you the honour and of course answer! You use the words that you "explained" and gave a "rationale". mmmm, to me you've just stated why ... so I don't have your understanding yet to agree with it. Maybe I'm hoping I could witness a teeny inkling of appreciation of what was being addressed even it was disagreed with. Plus I had to address a statement that UA-cam is not 16:9, and my 16:9 screen was the issue. But if you think it's important to chop the viewing screen and show black bars to show what a DCI 17x9 aspect looks like on a different ratio platform, whilst on a otherwise good technical run-down video with less visual clarity opportunities, well Ok. If you allow me to go on a bit, I've never met anybody in my life that likes it when a movie when shown on TV is displayed with black horizontal bars. I still remember a teacher 35 years ago telling how when a certain anticipated movie started with black bars on TV he was dreading it was going to stay that way. (Luckily it was just the titles.) And that was in the 4:3 era when the vertical axis was a greater proportion of the screen with more opportunity to chop. Now we have 16:9 screens, nice and wide, with no real need for black horizontal bars limiting the even further limited vertical axis, but (arrgh) it still happens. Never mind, love your stuff so far, and this discussion helps the UA-cam interaction algorithm anyway!
@@Paul_Rohde This is starting to feel like you're trolling. When a video project is produced in a format other than 16x9, there are two choices. Either you can display a narrow black bar above and below, in which case the viewer sees the entire image, or you can crop the image so that there is no letterbox. Which do you prefer? As I have said in more than one video, using an aspect ratio other than 16x9 if your target is any modern screen (and not cinematic projection) is pretentious. ua-cam.com/video/z1rdjGLmsd8/v-deo.html. Once more - I was demonstrating the capabilities of this camera, and if the note wasn't too subtle, that it can't maintain this capability in all modes. I"m sorry that you missed the point. My questions were literal - although there is clearly a degree of sarcasm involved.
Dear Maarten I want to buy GFX100s but I need ur help if you can clear my doubt . Does GFX100s allow video recording in 4:3 aspect ratio. Thankyou Maarten
Such an incredible contribution to this camera and helping people understand its capabilities. Thanks for doing all this work and presenting it so well. Subscribing to this channel.
A pleasure to read your kind words, thanks for subscribing!
Yes, really amazing work. Quite a few options here to chose, so thanks for taking the time. I am going to end up going through this again.
this as been the best video so far on the 100S
A pleasure to read your kind words, thanks for commenting.
Long time seen such a professional appearance. Thank you very much.
You are very welcome, thanks for your very kind comment.
Thanks for the informative Lesson on the GFX 100s Video Setup
Always my pleasure, thanks for the kind words.
HI Maarten, your video contained all the information I need to know on the video capabilities of this camera. Thank you so much for making and posting it.
Glad it was helpful! Always nice to hear from someone who appreciates my work.
Super helpful video. I have been shooting with my GFX100S for over a year and believe it or not I never knew of the video switch and settings. LOL
Always nice to know that my videos are useful and appreciated, thanks for taking the time to comment.
That was fun! Great watch, awesome information.
Always nice to hear from a viewer who has enjoyed my videos. Thanks!!
Just subscribed! Thanks for the info on Video Settings! I own the GFX 100 and appreciate your tips and ideas!
Thanks for the sub! Always nice to hear from viewers who appreciate my videos, thanks!!
Excellent video, however, my being new to video production, it has demonstrated the level of knowledge that must be obtained prior to fully understanding the GFX100s and video production generally. It has left me feeling like a I am a knuckle dragger! A shortened version for gumbies (like myself) would be good.
I appreciate the suggestion, but don't think that would be of value to most. I do try to keep the "should do" first and then the "optional" section.
Thank you so much for very good info.
Glad it was helpful! Thanks for commenting.
Thanks for the good video there is a lot to learn from you. I also try, but so far only learning.👍
I'm glad to hear that my work is appreciated by my viewers.
You made me feel I have made the right decision at getting this camera. I have a question about powering the camera externally, is that a power bank you're using? if so what would you recommend? Thank you indeed!
Any power adapter or battery with USB-C PD (power deliver) will power the camera while shooting.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thank you!
thanks Maarten. I still can't make my mind up about getting this camera. It would have to replace both ny GFX50R for (landscape) stills and my X-T3 (and all is lenses) for video. Decisions decisions.
Is either camera making you unhappy? I'm not sure I'd switch.
I’ve had a gfx 100 for about two months and I’m now testing out the video modes. I’m curious to know your raw video workflow in Final Cut. It’s definitely different than when I had the s1h.
The 100 raw video looks rec 709 on import instead of looking like FLog. It’s showing Flog on the Ninja while recording though. No Luts are set to be applied on the Ninja either (except for monitoring)
Good that you've managed to configure the Ninja so that you're getting a clean F-Log RAW. That was confusing.
This sounds like a good suggestion for a video?
Personally, I found that making the exposure/colour adjustments manually served me best.
@@MaartenHeilbron I would love for you to make a workflow video, lol. I’ve been trying to get into the video field (pt pro photographer for 20+ years) for the past year or so and editing is kicking my butt. Maybe I should just out source it. Thanks for you reply. It’s so little video related gfx 100 content around and your video was by far the best. Keep doing what you do 👏🏾
@@kennethwilliamsinc Thanks, your kind words are appreciated. I've added that to the September to do list (August already full :-)
@@MaartenHeilbron I’m subscribed now
@@kennethwilliamsinc Great! Thanks!!
Does it have the ability to digitally zoom into that massive 100 MP sensor when recording 4K? This could be really useful as there is so much resolution and sensor size for shooting videos! Thanks for the video.
Sadly, it does not.
@@MaartenHeilbron Too bad as that could have been one of it's killer feature! Thanks for the walkthroughs.
Thanks for this video. I have one question. How do I configure my short cut setting so I can change white balance manually while I see the scene I shoot?
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. White balance can be assigned to any of the function keys, which enable you to see the changes you're making.
Thank you for this extraordinairy content. I have however been bothered twice with mid ads which I am not againts if it profits you
Thank you for your kind words and the alert. That setting doesn't always "stick" when I set it during the upload process. I've disabled mid-roll ads again, and again, my apologies.
@@MaartenHeilbron It truly did not bother me. I just wanted to informe you.
@@MaartenHeilbron I doubt anyone would mind if you monetized, relatively your channel is of a higher standard so monetization wouldn't be a distraction or deterrent id imagine.
Thanks. My high standards include not interrupting you with mid-rolls.
You can add mid roles if you want and should not feel you can’t. You produce high quality videos with tons of information. If it helps you make profit while continuing to produce the great videos you already do then use them. I am not sure why people get upset about this. You are providing free information and it takes a ton of work for you behind the scenes. Whatever you feel is best for you but I am thankful for the time you put in to create these great videos.
shooting with 24fps the minimum shutter speed is 1/60th? Is not possible to shoot 1/48th?
Please watch the whole video before asking questions that are answered in the video. ua-cam.com/video/hLD_LQceM0o/v-deo.html
well done, thank you kindly! What are your thoughts on the low light noise?
As you can see, there's quite a lot of it at higher ISOs. For RAW recordings, it jeopardizes the key in several scenes. Thanks for your kind words.
@@MaartenHeilbron what ISO did you use during the candle light? Id welcome a lowlight ISO test, if it pleases the audience :)
@@MaartenHeilbron the key aberrations did give me pause. I am between the GFX 100s and the Lumix S1H. I'm finding the GFX may be for more specific circumstances where as the S1H better all around.
Oh, if I was purchasing a general purpose video camera, I'd take the X-T4. If you want full frame and RAW, the Z6II.
If Fujiflm can make GFX 100S (medium format with IBIS) similar size/weight as FF, Fujiflm should able make X-T4 (APS-C) similar size/weight as M4/3.
Wish ultra lightweight X-T5.
Have you considered the X-S10?
X-S10 hasn't WR and use PASM dials.
IMO Fujiflm should make X-S20 with WR and Fujilike dials in $999; X-T4 Mark II with dual processor (like Nikon) and built-in heatsink (like Sigma fp) for unlimited 4K video shooting.
It is because X-T4 price too close to mid-range FF. Canon RP (FF) only need $999.
@@myocean3228 Have you shared these concepts with Fujifilm? They may want to hire you as a product manager.
the whole video has a vibe to Donna Haraway: Story Telling for Earthly Survival documentary.
I'm going to take that as a compliment (not familiar with their work). Thanks for your kind words.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks to you for the great content as usual. Check that documentary, I believe you'd enjoy it !
please do a tutorial how to edit and save your own film simulation for stills and film on gfx100s its a big mess in the menu too complicated and you will be the first to do it no body has donet yet the pdf manual is a mess
Good suggestion, I'm working on a video about recipes - although likely with the x-t4. should be very similar for the GFX 100S model.
Am I missing something, I don't understand why in this video you (and everybody else that does it) don't use the full frame/ratio of UA-cam?
As I explained in the video, I decided to demonstrate the settings in this camera by using the full cinema configuration - using the DCI 17x9 aspect. That means there's a slight letterbox if you're viewing full screen on a 16x9 screen.
Although your screen may, UA-cam does not have a standard size or ratio.
@@MaartenHeilbron Hi Maarten, I hear you, but I still don't get it. Why squish everything down with black bars when the viewing audience is on UA-cam. Actually, for a system not confined by a physical screen, such as on a browser window, UA-cam does have a default standard ratio of 16:9 ... obviously chosen as this is the modern standard digital display (TV) ratio (based on an a-political compromise of cinema sizes, which conversely, don't appear to have a single standard ratio). Some phone companies etc try to sell more gadgets by trying to mess with the modern standard. If you're releasing your UA-cam video at the cinema, let me know, but I'm not paying (and I'm smuggling popcorn in from the supermarket) but for now your video has gone straight to UA-cam. Ok, maybe you're trying to demonstrate something, (I'm still not sure what), but I'm not for UA-camrs shrinking things down (or stealing/wasting viewing area) with black bars because somehow that's part of a formula for making something of great "cinematographic" quality. Cinema legends never mentioned that secret of black bars in interviews! In fact the intended canvas is filled up in the cinema, so why is it different for the intended home canvas? (... now for the 24 fps crippling eye sore scenario ... another day ...).
@@Paul_Rohde Clearly, repeating your comments after I've provided my rationale indicates that you don't hear me.
Why is your tolerance for those who don't agree with you so low? Why do you find my reply so insufficient? Please read my reply again, as it includes the reasons I chose to use DCI 17x9 to demonstrate this camera.
@@MaartenHeilbron Hi Maarten, you asked me a question, was that literal or rhetorical? If it was literal, I'll do you the honour and of course answer! You use the words that you "explained" and gave a "rationale". mmmm, to me you've just stated why ... so I don't have your understanding yet to agree with it. Maybe I'm hoping I could witness a teeny inkling of appreciation of what was being addressed even it was disagreed with. Plus I had to address a statement that UA-cam is not 16:9, and my 16:9 screen was the issue. But if you think it's important to chop the viewing screen and show black bars to show what a DCI 17x9 aspect looks like on a different ratio platform, whilst on a otherwise good technical run-down video with less visual clarity opportunities, well Ok. If you allow me to go on a bit, I've never met anybody in my life that likes it when a movie when shown on TV is displayed with black horizontal bars. I still remember a teacher 35 years ago telling how when a certain anticipated movie started with black bars on TV he was dreading it was going to stay that way. (Luckily it was just the titles.) And that was in the 4:3 era when the vertical axis was a greater proportion of the screen with more opportunity to chop. Now we have 16:9 screens, nice and wide, with no real need for black horizontal bars limiting the even further limited vertical axis, but (arrgh) it still happens. Never mind, love your stuff so far, and this discussion helps the UA-cam interaction algorithm anyway!
@@Paul_Rohde This is starting to feel like you're trolling. When a video project is produced in a format other than 16x9, there are two choices. Either you can display a narrow black bar above and below, in which case the viewer sees the entire image, or you can crop the image so that there is no letterbox. Which do you prefer?
As I have said in more than one video, using an aspect ratio other than 16x9 if your target is any modern screen (and not cinematic projection) is pretentious. ua-cam.com/video/z1rdjGLmsd8/v-deo.html. Once more - I was demonstrating the capabilities of this camera, and if the note wasn't too subtle, that it can't maintain this capability in all modes. I"m sorry that you missed the point.
My questions were literal - although there is clearly a degree of sarcasm involved.
Dear Maarten
I want to buy GFX100s but I need ur help if you can clear my doubt . Does GFX100s allow video recording in 4:3 aspect ratio. Thankyou Maarten
It does not. Only 16x9 and 17x9 are supported.