Ivermectin or Molnupiravir
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 кві 2024
- Link to featured video
• Updates on Hezekiah an...
Link to Wefwafwa’s channel
/ @wefwafwaandrew
(he needs more subscribers)
Link to support Wefwafwa’s work in Africa
patreon: / awmedicalvideos
Drugs Shown to Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 Disease: Comparative Basic and Clinical Pharmacology of Molnupiravir and Ivermectin
austinpublishinggroup.com/pha...
/ leslie-adesuyi-ajayi-m...
There are still many nations where vaccines are not yet widely available,
There is a gradual shift in focus, to antiviral drugs,
Adjunctive chemoprophylaxis
Active treatment of new SARS-CoV-2 infections
Post -vaccination breakthrough COVID-19 cases
The two ways to get new drugs
Develop novel antiviral drugs for SARS-CoV-2
Repurpose existing FDA -approved drugs to treat COVID-19
Ivermectin is the most studied “repurposed” medication globally,
in randomized clinical trials, retrospective studies and meta- analyses.
Molnupiravir and Ivermectin Anti-SARS- CoV-2 Mechanisms, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Molnupiravir is a broad spectrum antiviral agent against SARS- CoV-2, SARS-CoV,
seasonal or pandemic influenza and MERS corona virus
Ivermectin is an FDA-approved, WHO essential drug used as broad spectrum antiparasitic, antibiotic
and which has demonstrated broad spectrum antiviral activity against RNA viruses, including HIV, Zika, MERS corona virus
The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
www.sciencedirect.com/science...
5000-fold inhibition of SARS-CoV-2, (99.98% at 48 hours
The inhibitory concentration IC50 of Molnupiravir shows it to be a more potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent, compared to Ivermectin in vitro.
Both molnupiravir and ivermectin are well absorbed after oral dosing
Tmax of molnupiravir being 1-1.75 hours,
With a half life of 7 hours
Tmax of ivermectin is 4-6 hours
Very long half life of 81-91 hours
Ivermectin, being lipophilic has a large volume of distribution
Ivermectin has the ability to accumulate in the lungs
The anti-SARS-CoV-2 actions, both of molnupiravir and ivermectin, are dose and concentration dependent
Molnupiravir active metabolite (NHC-5’ Triphosphate), acts as a competitive alternative substrate for viral RNA
causing viral mutagenesis or mutations, which leads to viral error catastrophe and extinction of replication
There is some concern about the safety of NHC -nucleoside triphosphate, which is also mutagenic to mammalian cells
Ivermectin, multifarious actions,
Binding to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S
Reducing cell entry via human ACE2 receptors
Reducing viral transcription
Inhibition of cytokine production and inflammation
(not yet been shown for molnupiravir)
Complimentary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drugs
May be additive or synergistic
This should be further investigated in anti-SARS- CoV-2 antiviral combination therapy.
A combination of molnupiravir with Ivermectin putatively, in effects on RdRP or cytokine release.
Cost
www.who.int/selection_medicin...
The cost for a package of 100 tablets of 3 mg ivermectin is $2.96.
Say, 12mg per day for 5 days = $0.53
Safety
www.vigiaccess.org
www.who-umc.org/vigibase/vigi...
Efficacy
Ivermectin
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34145...
For deaths, average risk ratio 0.38, (62% benefit) (moderate-certainty evidence
ivmmeta.com
Early treatment
Late treatment
Prophylaxis
www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/...
Main results, Treating people in hospital with COVID-19
We don't know whether ivermectin compared with placebo or usual care, 28 days after treatment:-
leads to more or fewer deaths
worsens or improves patients' condition assessed by need for ventilation or oxygen
increases or reduces unwanted events
Preventing COVID-19
We don't know whether ivermectin leads to more or fewer deaths compared with no drug
Funny how the cheap stuff is banned but the expensive stuff gets immediate approval 🤔
Not funny sad
Even worse considering it is the same company.
@@wjteale it’s probably the same stuff, just tweaked enough to get a new patent.
Crimes against humanity
There is a bill now, were they are trying to make it so that we have to have prescription for all supplements (Durbin's bill), we could not even buy vitamin D ..without prescription (and 5 times the price ..)
We need global medical reform. We NEED laws to protect human medical rights and restrict pharma malpractice.
Yes! 💯 we need something good to come out of this whole situation.
We need a Nuremberg 2.0.
1 of 3 Latin American women have been sterilized, mostly without telling them.
@@christinechin1909 I want to introduce you to something profitable, ⛔🤔✅🚀
±¹ ⁸⁵⁹ ⁵⁶⁷ ⁰³⁴²
When a Japanese medical group offered to collaborate with Merk, (the original inventor of Ivermectin, however who's patent has snice long expired) and to do trials and studies on effectiveness of Ivermectin against COVID-19, Merk flatly declined. Now here we see Merk have developed a similar drug they are pushing to get approved and at nearly 1400 times the cost? This speak volumes about the integrity of these pharma groups, and the very Governments that are willing support such behaviour.
It’s even worse then it seems, Ivermectin was proven if taken early reduced hospitalization and deaths by 85%.. the drug they reformulated is only 50% affective, which in turn will keep the virus going and the money rolling in.. Ivermectin being 85% affective would end the pandemic..
Sadly it's always been about the money not the what's best for the public
Its not a similar drug. Ivermectin is not an antiviral! The new drug is completely different!
@@coppertheginger7514 but more expensive. It's a money spinner. Theres many cures but why cure things when they can sell a thousand palliatives to sell. And ivermectin does have anti viral properties. God sake! It's more than obvious who the lackies are
@@Rik77 I laughed out loud, thanks for the dry humor!
The non use of Ivermectin in most of the world. I wonder how many lives could have been saved
The toadies of drug company running ads on mass media tv are complicit in mass murder, no different than nazi gestapo.
the CDC and WHO should be held accountable for all the deaths that could have been avoided with Ivermectin
It's been shown to reduce fatalities by more than 60%, and greatly reduce transmission too. You'd have to say, it could possibly have saved millions.
@@alanjm1234
Except you have no evidence of that at all. Pure nonsense generated by people undermining science and democracy.
@@Shelmerdine745 he just showed you the evidence.
As someone else quipped, the new drug could have been marketed as "I can't believe it's not Ivermectin."
You made me laugh! I'll be sharing that, no doubt!
Molnupmectin!
Y’all in this thread making me laugh but every time someone says or writes the word Ivermectin the execs at Merck get intestinal cramps. Hey! Let’s yell it from the treetops.
“And I’ll tell it and speak it and think it and breathe it,
And reflect from the mountain so all should can see it.” Bob Dylan
something Dr John did not mention is that it appears that Molnupiravir is, unlike ivermectin, mutagenic so I think we need to watch this space carefully..
Pfizermectin
For those who didn't know: the cost of producing one course of Molnupiravir is estimated to be under 18 $ yet they sell it for over 700 $.
Which slightly forgets that developing Molnupiravir probably cost a few billions...
Isn’t that crazy. It takes about 25 cents to make a bottle of aspirin but they charge you 5-6 bucks
@@Andreas-gh6is Yet, they will offer it to countries outside the USA for approx. $12/course. So again, the USA shoulders almost all the cost of development of these drugs. The USA government gives these drug makers grants using our taxes but we see no benefit for our contribution to the development of a drug.
Doesn't surprise me one bit
@@causticchameleon7861 of course not. Products made in other countries that may cost us 50bucks cost that countries people at least 3 times that much to buy
Don't fancy the risk of Molnupiravir, rather trust ivermectin. Thanks Doc for the video as always 👍
It’s a joke when both products originated from Merck, I always say follow the money trail
@@judithmcrae3704 Even India a poor country dropped Ivermectin. What does that tell you? It simply doesn't work.
👍👍
@@PaulFilmer wheres the proof
@@Teena19859 the fact Peru also started using at the same time as India and their cases went up?
The criminal efforts to down play ivermectins effectiveness is all about the lack of money to be made and not about lives that could be saved by its low cost use.
Especially when academics that challenge its efficacy don’t even have solid evidence or just don’t know…
Also it’s laughable that the louder counter arguments come from nations that have such a large stake vaccine profitability. What a world we live in…
The FDA could not put the "Vaccine" in use, if there would be admitted successful treatment for the covid flu, that's why.
@Chronicles like micro robots that fit through the head of a hypodermic needle. Research that on utube. Scary!
Definitive.
The intention of all government actions is TO KILL not heal.
You're brave to have made this video and stayed so calm and matter of fact in your presentation, Dr Campbell. If there's a prize for intelligence, ethics and integrity in medicine, you should win it for your courage in pressing on.
Dr Nathan Thompson channel is
Great also
@@deepnurmom1737 You are absolutely right. The latest Dr Nathan Thompson video is a must watch.
@@theredboneking who posted that recommendation yesterday? I think someone on GAB, but I saw it, watched the video and you're all correct, I subscribed because it was great !
Then get him to talk about Brazil and ivermecton... when you do research you will find he's leaving out evidence
@@RantingYogi hahahahha hahahahha you dont like the side effect of a vaccine wait till you see the side effects of the disease... hahhahaha the ignorance here is astonishing.
The Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Australia) does not regulate clinical practice. 'off-label use' is a clinical decision made at the discretion of the treating clinician who is responsible for obtaining informed consent from their patient and ensuring that the medical device is the appropriate treatment option and carries a positive benefit-risk profile.
And now we have drs, and chemists banned in Australia from prescribing or dispensing
The more you read into what the TGA says, the more glaring the contradictions and inconsistencies become.
Their arguments for banning ivermectin are easily debunked, which sadly leaves you wondering... What is the REAL reason they banned it?
@@xeroytchannel Follow the money. See who is on Pfizer's pay roll.
I've taken both of these drugs for Covid starting in Jan 2022. Molnupiavir worked well but a week later my body started severe covid symptoms again. 7 weeks later, and three hospital visits, I started ivermectin and was better and healing in 48 hours.
May I ask what dose of ivermectin you took please? Thanks
When there is billions to be made, the lives of ordinary people are a mere statistic on a spreadsheet
I call us the *normal* people :)
@@stoniblue3569 fair point
Stoni Blue can’t you see that this is what this old conman is all about - come on waken up !
As Stalin said
You do understand!
We don't need "more definitive" guidelines - we need honest and transparent guidelines peppered with a sense of curiosity.
This. If we had faith in our government and regulatory bodies, without any worry of regulatory capture, and had transparency there would be no issue at all.
@@dbo514
“We”? Speak for yourself. If you actually knew how drug approval works, maybe you’d know better. It’s there to protect you from harm and bad actors, like the nurse.
@@Shelmerdine745 I know how drug approval works. Give money to key figures in the FDA or other regulatory bodies. Job done.
@@Shelmerdine745 I see from your comments that you are clearly a shill for pharmaceutical companies. You do not have the best interests of the people in mind, so I feel confident in using WE to refer to common people.
@@dbo514
Ignorant liar.
Thank you Dr I am a nurse and the way you have explained things has been very helpful. A clear explanation thank you so much. I am trying to do as much research as I can from every angle. I think as a health professional it is extremely important to be informed and open to all points of view. We should be sharing what we learn and also be open to opposing points of view, not getting angry at one another, fighting or getting political. Please be kind to one another people.
My soon to be 83 years old mother, who has chronic respiratory issues [asthma, etc.] from the Dom. Rep., started taking Ivermectin since Covid19 came about; before able to get vaccinated [got vaccinated since last summer.] She travels back and forth to Florida and I'm GLAD to share that she has been WELL, and HEALTHY. Dr. Campbell, I truly appreciate! THANK YOU, THANK YOU ,THANK YOU
We need doctors that actually care to organize and make a fuss over the truth. Otherwise we slip down the slope into medical authoritarianism.
too late.
@@esecallum it sure is with that attitude
@@nedyah151 it's not about our attitude. It's about some doctors integrity.
For example, it was well know from early on that HCQ, if it was to have any value, needed to be used in conjunction with ZINC.
But there were many "trials" conducted where zinc wasn't given.
These "trials" were clearly INTENDED to fail.
Consider that. Doctors were knowingly giving their patients less than optimal care in order to promote an agenda.
Sadly, integrity is a very rare commodity these days.
Do the doctors want to keep their license to practice? Does the hospital want to retain a doctor that rocks the boat with the bureaucratic powers?
i guess you didnt hear about the statement made in rome on behalf of 7200 doctors and scientists demanding governments get out of the patient doctor relationship! you should look into it!
Dr Campbell, this is the most brave podcast you have made to date, and people around the world truly appreciate what you have done to put the actual facts on the table for all to see, as we know them today. Thank you.
i seriously worry that the data on invermectin is accurate...so that reflects on Dr. Campbell for repeating it.
@@ProfSimonHolland One of the reasons we have had trouble seeing efficacy when “studying” ivermectin against COVID-19 is dosing is too low and duration of dosing is usually too short in all studies, and the patient is not followed long enough. The course should be a minimum of five days, and the dosing should be higher than what is used in parasitic treatment, body weight dependent. Ivermectin’s efficacy becomes obvious on day six of use. Recent study from Israel followed patients for 15 days on only a three day dosing showed remarkable efficacy versus placebo.
On an anecdotal note, I saw this timing and advocacy of ivermectin when my wife was treated for COVID-19 . Her doctor prescribed ivermectin, she was on it for 10 days, day six and beyond was key.
@@ProfSimonHolland why?
Professor Simon Holland a
He's salesman, selling useless drugs.
"We don't want divisions into different camps. That is not helpful."
Thank you sir. Those sentences should be completely unnecessary, but here we are.
It's true, I find myself constantly repeating this almost daily.
In all fairness, the push for mandatory vaccinations and Pfizer's attempt to get FDA approval to vaccinate children as young as 2 years old makes it difficult to give them credit for having any moral integrity whatsoever. The behavior of the people pushing vaccines doesn't convey any resemblance to scientific scrutiny or medical responsibility.
It is worth doing a study to try to determine if everyone would have been and would be better off without any vaccinations at all, while relying on natural immunity and ivermectin, which is what 3rd world countries have been doing anyway. Obesity is a subject that hasn't gotten enough attention as well.
Yes and Campbell plays a part in that by talking about so called anti vaxxers
That is not what any good Dr should be doing
@@taitjones6310 I'm sure comparisons will be done between nations with the different approaches. Of course, there won't be any pharmaceutical companies paying for those studies unless they're quite positive the results will favour them.
But there has been tremendous scientific scrutiny on the vaccines. Moreover they are one of the few things which are incontrovertibly proven to help the situation. In my little home province we had a nasty run with Covid earlier in the year and the vaccines we purchased were temporarily delayed in delivery. So when they did become available the majority of people got the jab. The statistics trend rather clearly. On the one hand, vaccinated people make up 40% of cases in our province. But 80% of the population is vaccinated, meaning 20% of the population comprises 60% of the cases. When you look at critical illnesses the differences are much more pronounced. We rarely have anyone in our ICU's who is fully vaccinated. We also notice that areas in the province with lower vaccination rates have higher case rates.
As someone who is scientifically inclined, I have no grudge whatsoever if Ivermectin or any other treatment turns out to be more effective than the vaccines. But we do know with certainty that the vaccines help.
@@trentreimer130 There are A LOT of different things that factor in to a person getting infected, but I'll try not to run off on a tangent on this subject.
As far as vaccines are concerned, in the Pfizer clinic trials that I read the results of, the vaccinated group had 5% fewer infections than the control group. This is where the "95% efficacy" claim comes from. I know it's misleading and counterintuitive, but that's the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated (at least in the published clinical trials).
The point being that the media has facilitated recommendations from Big Pharma companies via the WHO and CDC, who have been adamant about telling people that common sense and time tested things like taking care of your immune system through exercise and fresh air along with vitamin supplements of D and Zinc are "pseudo-science". As well as demonizing drugs like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
Just because it needs to be said, I'm not in the boat of believing that the 'vaccine' is a cloak and dagger means of mass murder, but it is a cash grab.
There hasn't been any scientific scrutiny publicly over the difference (long-term) of just letting everyone get it while finding the most effective methods of treating the infected.
Most notably, there is a false idea that anybody, vaccinated or not, is going to escape getting infected. EVERYONE WILL GET INFECTED. It's an inevitable fact. By this point everyone has already been exposed to it, and it's going to be around as long as humans are, so our bodies have to adapt to it, and that is done through exposure.
To summarize: drug companies are focused on selling as many vaccines as possible to pad their profit margins, and the argument over vaccine efficacy is a red herring. The issue everyone should be focused on is supporting and improving their immune systems and overall health, and I haven't witnessed much scientific scrutiny over that.
You're a good man, Dr Campbell
We should all be so lucky to have a physician like you
I do love the subtle informed rebellion of Campbell, you can tell he is being “diplomatic” when coming to his conclusion.
It would seem to be he comes in very well under the radar.
@ Badger M
I love the fact that he brought up that Cochrane paper which was full of nothing but “we don’t know”. You can see him trying to hold in a bout of derisive laughter but even so a little chuckle gets out as if to say “why publish this thing if all you have to say is “we don’t know””. He could have left that paper out of the video but I think he was taking a bit of a shot at them. 🎯
@@Vladviking he needs to. If he comes out with too much truth he will be deplatformed.
He has to otherwise his channel will be taken down and he loses his avenue to communicate important information such as this.
i guess what you see reflects something about you. informed is not a word I would use. quoting junk pseudosicence alongside cochrane reports as if they somehow represent a balance. very sad that people don't think critically
And the Australian government in conjunction with the TGA banned Ivermectin. They should all be charged before an international court for crimes against humanity
I agree it is a crime against humanity. Maybe Australian & other western countries might join the Indian Bar Association in serving papers on the WHO Chief Scientist for misinformation regarding ivermectin.
All I would like is Ivermectin available for those who want to take it.
I may be cynical, But, How I see the situation in regards to COVID 19 is that this is premeditated murder for a very large gain by some very large organizations, all I can say is follow the money.
I reckon. For sure. I wrote to the governments (there's state as well as federal are culpable) and told them straight: you are condemning me possibly to death and I'll curse you with that dying breath if it happens and my family for generations hence will curse you. that's how absolutely true it is.
@@daehaeng8439 Let's follow the money. The governments banning these products end up having to spend a fortune more to treat their population. So in following the money using Ivermectin would be in their best interest if it worked.
@@PaulFilmer it's almost as if maybe ivermectin hasn't been proven to be safe or effective yet
The cost analysis explains why the extreme level of propaganda against Ivermectin (even SNL took a jab at it in a very not funny skit). The banksters can't make money at 2 cents a pill!
P.S. That outreach is wonderful and glad to see Ben and Hezekiah are doing well!
I was once a Herpes patient, but now I have finally got rid of it with the help of (doctor Anii) he is a great traditional Doctor you can also get your self cured with this same remedy stay safe and stay blessed ❤️❤️ You can also visit his UA-cam channel for more information God bless.
Why are steroids and fluvoxamine getting such positive studies while IVM does not?
YOU ARE SUCH A BLESSING THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS! Your style of breaking down research is beautiful. YOU are what we NEED MORE OF. Genuine humans that inquire and think!
When it doesn’t it make cents it’s because it makes dollars.
Only 2.4 percent of people in third world countries are vaccinated. Western countries hoovered up the entire world’s vaccine supply. We outbid the poor and left them to perish so we could triple vax our healthy. This is worse than all of colonialism combined. We have created a humanitarian crisis throughout africa. Or maybe we just didnt need it?
@@terrythetuffkunt9215
- We outbid the poor and left them to perish
What nonsense
The vaxxers have no clue about reality
@@terrythetuffkunt9215 well they didnt perished as the rest of the world either thought they would or hope they would
@@kjell1087 thats exactly what happened. Have you even looked at the vaccine distribution? It is largely rich Western countries that are getting vaccinated. The poor countries have been left to deal with it. I know, its hard to admit you are part of perpetrating the worst humanitarian crisis in history, but you are welcome to prove me otherwise. There was no equitable distribution of the vax. But hey, all the rich white people will be running around showing off their vaccine certificates and trying to triple dose every man and his dog, while africa just gets on with it. Maybe we didnt need it?
@@terrythetuffkunt9215 Perhaps the Israelis are just being left to "get on with it" too?
The people should have a choice on what antiviral to take.
Personally, I'd be taking ivermectin.
But the science.....
Just make sure it’s prescribed by a knowledgeable MD, not a farm supply store ;)
I’m joking of course. But also serious. It’s sad that so many have resorted to inappropriate channels and wildly inaccurate doses because of their doctors’ reluctance to recognize the legitimacy of an appropriate prescription.
@@peetiegonzalez1845
- It’s sad that so many have resorted to inappropriate channels and wildly inaccurate doses because of their doctors’
It was nazi lies in Media
Same here. My doctor gave me hydroxychloroquin. My covid systems last about 3 days compared to my husband who wasn’t prescribed anything. He was down for 2 weeks. I got lucky my doctor was older and prescribed steroids antibiotics and hydroxychloroquin
@@cindylouwho620 : The plural of anecdote is not data.
Thank you Dr. Campbell for your educated, sober, rational, and sensible reviews. We need so much more of this in these times.
I remember a time when I threw you under the bus Dr Campbell for spewing the lame stream lies about Ivermectin. You now are one of 3 of my go to sources for factual information. Good on you Dr John.
"...A Canadian emergency room physician has been banned from practicing medicine in Alberta after he defied the province’s COVID treatment protocols by prescribing Ivermectin to three patients.
In a powerful speech last week, Dr. Daniel Nagase vented about the shoddy way COVID patients were being treated in a rural hospital in Alberta, and concluded that “something malicious is going on.”
...
A doctor a few hours north of me in Englehart, Ontario, was chastised by the college after making posts on Twitter and Facebook about knowing your rights and refusing the vaccine if you don't feel comfortable taking it.
God bless Dr. Nagase! He is trying to save lives. May the Alberta officials who took his license away be removed and fall.
Dr. Nagase, hope you have a good labor, employment lawyer, so you can sue them.. ⁉️♥️🇺🇸
The doctors and nurses take ivermectin preventively but they can not prescribe it to you.
@@jimbeam8819 well they can its not illegal to prescribe off label meds but the government essentially made it illegal
Dr. John is a Master of subtle sarcasm.
Yes, effectively! 🙏🏻🤔
@@whitebalance6498 I know, right? Hee hee.
Do you all mean about the Cochrane Collaboration paper he read from where their answer to every question was “we don’t know”?
oh yes!!!!! If the implications were not so serious it would be funny...but how many lives have been lost over censorship and manipulation of the truth. It is tragic and the story must be told...by someone very brave. God Bless the doctors of the flccc. May the lawsuits fly!
his best ordinance doesn't explode until after it's struck the target...
After my wife and I contracted COVID-19, I self treated myself and my spouse with IVM at 91mcg/lb of body weight using a topical paste applied to the backs of hands. Within hours, our major symptoms subsided, less the back pain associated with the delta variant. We followed up with a second dose after 48 hours and I am completely asymptomatic and my spouse, who was bedridden prior to administration of IVM, has recovered to the point of mild symptoms, with some fatigue. We had asked our primary to prescribe IVM, and we were met with denial because “there is no scientific evidence that IVM has any effect on the virus.” The fact that this existing drug is being denied to people who are ill with COVID-19 is criminal.
@don s no BS. I’m simply sharing our results. Yes, it was a matter of hours when we began to notice slight improvement, however after 12 hours it was pretty extreme. My entire family was tested (i had a rapid test, my wife PCR, my daughter rapid test) and we were all positive, and all had similar symptoms, albeit mine were mild as I was the last to become symptomatic, but took IVM on day 0 of fatigue, brain fog, and cough began to emerge). My wife keeps going back and forth with feeling fine to feeling symptomatic, and she was vaccinated 8 days prior to testing positive. Thank you for calling me a liar too, by the way.
@@jeffreyhaut , don has be sharing his narrative on all comments that see truth! Paid bots 🤖 $$
Wow, where did you get the paste from? I've only seen it as a pill. I'm in the USA
@aliciacowan8111 you can get it at any farmers market or Tractor Supply store. Also online.. You only use a pinky finger tip amount or tiny drop, on a cracker. I have the paste for a backup but took the pills when I had cv.
I love watching the look of happiness on Dr Campbell’s face when he is viewing the clips of those in need receiving help! Beautiful…😀❤️
Well done, Dr. John. You presented the facts in purely an evidence based manner - no spin, opinion or judgment. Quite refreshing! The conclusions are obvious to me, but everyone should come to their own conclusion.
We don't need our leaders to be more definitive about our Healthcare decisions. We need our leaders to get out of the way and let the patient and doctors decide what is best on an individual basis for the patient in question. Government almost always infringes on rights and grabs more power. The government should listen to and work for the people, not the other way around. Very few leaders are trustworthy and most are more concerned with their bank accounts than the welfare of their citizens. Sad but true.
Governments around the world have one purpose: to sell gratuities to the highest bidder. At last, the people are on their own! Medicine in the USA is more corrupt than Wall Street
Clearly the breadth of Wall Street fraud is extraordinary. I submit medical fraud is equal in breadth but more pernicious in scope. This is because everyone signs onto the gravy train; and, it feeds like a parasite directly off the misery of the people.
“Come in here, dear boy, have a cigar
You're gonna go far, you're gonna fly high
You're never gonna die
And did we tell you the name of the game, boy?
We call it Riding the Gravy Train”
Why doesn’t a dentist treat the infective agents that ‘cause’ gum disease with the required antibiotic combinations - or any antibiotic? Why are physicians’ access to medications and antibiotics (e.g., amphenicols) blocked? Why are vitamins like E fraudulently demonized whilst drugs that shut down hormone production (statins) - resulting in premature aging - approved? The number one cause of emergency room visits - blood thinners - shouldn’t even be legal; there are in fact, far safer solutions!
Cures are blocked; and, treating the underlying ‘cause’ of disease is blocked. The profit is in the management of symptoms at best; and, creating more disease at worst.
In fact, there are countless examples of surgeries and drugs that are deployed to temporarily mollify symptom; but, which ‘cause’ far more long-range disease and suffering. All of this is great for profits! No one questions anything.
I wrote a medical text about psychotropic drugs. In my research I documented 100s of autopsies that gave evidence that benzodiazepines were the seminal cause of death to many celebrities over time: Prince, Elvis Presly, Michael Jackson, etc.
Benzodiazepines form a chemical torniquet around clusters of neurons in the brain. Over the short term this can have the effect of lowering anxiety as brain transmission is greatly attenuated. However, over time, this kills enormous patches of brain matter. As large patches of the brain die the patients mind grows weaker; and, they must resort to opioids and/or alcohol to face the challenges of daily life. Brain death in long-term benzodiazepine use has been clearly elucidated and shockingly visualized thanks to advances in brain imaging studies.
After taking benzodiazepines for a time, the sleep architecture of the brain fails requiring the patient to take yet more brain-damaging drugs. Death by suicide or overdose is typical. For this reason, the European Medical Associations have blocked the long-term use of these drugs. Yet in the USA, Xanax is a money maker: priced at over 30,000% higher than the international generic equivalent.
No one questions when doctors randomly remove masses of organ tissue; or cut up vertebra resulting in their collapse around exiting nerve bundles. Not only did their procedures fail to consider & address the underlying ‘cause’ of disease, these procedures effectively created a highly-profitable life-long in-patient phenomenon.
Government supports it all because big pharma monopolies, medical consortiums and bankers who back it all fund elections.
Today we shuffle barefoot through TSA lines whilst trying to hold up our pants; and, socially distance, wear masks that damage viral fighting immunity, and close businesses simply because government bureaucrats tell us too. No one is permitted to question anything.
In many cases, if you want to ‘get well’ or achieve good health you have to leave the USA for treatment. The bureaucrats block treatments. Take the example of Lyme Disease - which was in fact created by the US Government: the cure is banned by the IDSA, (Infectious Diseases Society of America). Chronic Lyme patients typically suffer from multiple infections. Therefore, the cure to chronic Lyme disease requires either an amphenicol or multiple antibiotic drug combinations to cover the breadth of coinfected agents, (e.g., Anaplasma, Babesiosis, Mycoplasmas, Bartonella, Tularemia, etc.).
However, the IDSA will fine a physician $10K and revoke his license unless he treats the patient with (only) doxycycline. And yet doxycycline does nothing to kill the many co-infective agents or even borrelia (borrelia merely rolls up into a protective cyst until after the patient discontinues taking doxycycline - then it comes back out to infect the patient).
The Connecticut AG sued the IDSA for this practice - finding five executives there to be holding corrupting financial interests in the big pharma monopolies. And yet nothing has changed in this policy set by the IDSA: physicians are still banned from curing the disease.
There are countless examples that can be cited. The Americans pay a lot, lot more simply to be parasitically sucked dry by an inhuman system. If you want to get a cure, you have to leave the country! It was for this reason that I voted with my feet, and moved out of the USA for good - Which has come to be the best decision of my life.
The U.S. Is an “Oligarchy With Unlimited Political Bribery”
Former president Jimmy Carter said on the nationally syndicated radio show the Thom Hartmann Program that the United States is now an “oligarchy” in which “unlimited political bribery” has created “a complete subversion of our political system as a payoff to major contributors.” Both Democrats and Republicans, Carter said, “look upon this unlimited money as a great benefit to themselves.”
Carter was responding to a question from Hartmann about recent Supreme Court decisions on campaign financing like Citizens United.
Transcript:
firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/07/30/jimmy-carter-u-s-oligarchy-unlimited-political-bribery/
MEANWHILE: Vaccine monopolies make cost of vaccinating the world against COVID at least 5 times more expensive than it should cost! And why not: Former commissioner at FDA, Scott Gottlieb, currently sits at the Board of Directors at Pfizer.
www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/vaccine-monopolies-make-cost-vaccinating-world-against-covid-least-5-times-more
100% facts.
👍🏻 well said 💯right!!!
You can let your doctor do what you want but most doctors knew this pandemic was man-made and ivermectin worked to fight covid so they are no better than big pharmaceutical companies because they kept quiet about it so they wouldn't loose their jobs
Spot on!!
Excellent review; however, our leaders do not need to be more "definitive", they need to be more open to scientific debate without agenda. Your videos are exemplary. I don't always agree, but I cannot fault your approach! Thank you for leading a proper debate.
I want to introduce you to something profitable, ⛔🤔✅🚀
⁺¹ ⁸⁵⁹ ⁵⁶⁷ ⁰³⁴²
Text on Whatsapp ⛔✅⛔🚀.
A couple drugs should have been approved for "emergency use" a long time ago. It was official policy for a while to treat patients with HydroxyChloroquine even in US hospitals, but then it became all about selling vaccines.
Listen to this UK pathologist ua-cam.com/video/btWfAXQ8wYg/v-deo.html
I love watching ur videos🙂
U explain everything so well, so we can all understand. I also like that ur not pro covid vaxx, or anti... that it's about the scientific reasoning and finding, then explaining what works best.
This is what we all need, so we can make better decisions for ourselves, and not be forced into taking any drug. It'll help so many find the right one for their body/health issues.
Then everyone can do what works best for them, and discuss options with their Dr... instead of having ransom strangers telling them what to do.
Thank u for ur amazing work😎
THANK YOU Mr. Cambell - This is EXCELLENT to hear , how you take this SERIOUS ! Thankyou thankyou thankyou !!!
Dr. John just cares about the data, no the politics. That's what we want.
Dr Nathan Thompson channel
Jaw dropped vid
And who determines the interpretation of the data,
before they are made public?
ua-cam.com/video/btWfAXQ8wYg/v-deo.html
@@deepnurmom1737 who
Covid Survival rate comparisons.
Age 0-19…..99.997% survival rate-same odds as dying from a sharp object.
Age 20-29…..99.986 survival rate-same odds as dying from sunstroke
Age 30-39……99.969% survival rate-same odds as dying from choking on food.
Age 40-49…..99.920% survival rate-same odds as dying of drowning
Age 50-59…..99.730% survival rate-same odds as dying in a pedestrian accident
Age 60-69……99.410% survival rate-same odds as dying in a car crash.
Age 70+……97.600% survival rate-same odds as dying chronic respiratory disease
Source CDC dot gov
Watching that little boy get help has changed the entire trajectory of my day. There is hope for our future.
The gratitude of the people that appreciate the help and support they get is refreshing as well. Congratulations, PychoCat! You are still human!!!!!
What great work you’re both doing. Thanks for sharing, Dr. Campbell.
Well done. Thank you for presenting the facts, no spin. Much respect Dr.
Utter Pradesh is the an amazing example of using Ivermectin by government officials....The WHO was not willing to mention of the use of Home Care Kits which included ivermectin which would be a contradiction of their own advice on ivermectin.
You posted this the same day the indian gov. released stats showing ivermectin didnt work. don't cherry pick data. it might still be effective, we just don't really know yet.
@@KarpKomet ' showing ivermectin didn't work' ... like what ?
It didn't work 100% of the time in 100% of the cases used? In a population of over 200 million people !
Yours comment is ridiculous.. in my opinion.
@@KarpKomet .... government stats are not accurate in this world of hypocrisy.... all countries are pressured by the Soros/ Gates, (WEF), cronies, and WHO is doing their dirty work....‼⁉️👿
@@petermaddenindependenttdca1563 Their numbers dropped as quickly as they did during their last big outbreak which did not use IVM.
@@KarpKomet these conspiracy nuts in the comments not point replying to them dude. They are crazy
The price difference says it all. Molnupiravir was on the news here in Melbourne,Victoria, no mention of its' cost. When my GP made the statement "It doesn't work" when questioned about Ivermectin, (no reson), a red flag went up. Seemed like a cover up to me, and now Molnupiravir, (at $700 bucks a go), fancy that.
Les, question...are the riots and lock downs as bad as some report? Looking for truth from a local. Thx
@ Les
Your GP doesn’t get visits from any of the generic drug manufacturers because margins are small but he/she does get visits from pharmaceutical reps that have funds and/or perks to give away. Merck is getting $1.2 Billion for Molnupiravir. It wouldn’t be hard to set aside some $ for ‘promotion’ for that kind of payoff now would it?
@@tru136 As I live to the north of the CBD I had no contact. They appeared to be quite local, huge "police" presence with the resulting violence. There was the usual "rent a mob" present apparently. The lockdowns are doing my head in, I just want out.
@@mikedavison3400 Pfizer isn't doing all that bad either.
@ J A
Molnupiravir has shown some efficacy equivalent to Ivermectin but there are several reasons why IVM would be the preferred route and they’re outlined in the video. I have concerns about the new drug because it appears to do what some oncology drugs do and that’s mess with RNA or DNA replication. Those drugs hit our normal cells just as hard as they do any malignant cells.
Thank you so much for giving people understandable information. So many folks on the Internet are giving information without showing the sources of their data. Thank you for showing everyone how it is done. Allen
Ivermectin costs $75 per 20 3mg tablets as of today. I've heard it costs 2 cents to produce 1 tablet and the WHO has access to a lot of 6mg tablets, yet here we are ready to have our children jabbed or no in person school.
I've paid £7.25 s tube in UK
That lasts about 6 days. Far far cheaper and a very good safety record as well as success rate.
My hero. I get so angry about the fact that we need an inexpensive therapeutic for the impoverished nations, but any discussion of Ivermectin makes people crazy. Fully vaccinated, got my flu shot, but still want a therapeutic!!
The Prophet
Haven't you heard? We used to be donkeys and elephants but now we are either horses or sheep. Bring out your clubs and may the most violent tribe win...
Together Trial a joint search by Brazil and Canada to find cost effective, repurposed drugs for low and medium income countries has been working hard on trials to find a drug capable of helping. They have some promising results from fluvoxamine and are undergoing 2 other trials - look at their site - but ivermectin was proven to be no more effective than a placebo. Shame but that's drug discovery for you - constantly disappointing.
@@lizjones2808 Well, the Doctor has explained the effectiveness of Ivermectin. Have you watched his episode about the use of Ivermectin in India? But that said, if there is another inexpensive drug that can be used in countries which do not have access to vaccines, I'm all for it.
@@davenetdog Cases started to go down before it was used and India, like the rest of the world with Delta had a quick rise because it was so infectious but once everyone without immunity got it, it went down fast. Look at Peru. They were given it and the cases went up. It was only when the vaccination programme started that the cases went down
@@lizjones2808 love how you provide links/citations for your claims. It is so very helpful to have someone with your knowledge and experience ..uh, who are you?
I’ve had praise and criticism of Dr John. But he was the first person I heard talk about ivermectin and I’m pleased to see him talk about ivermectin again.
this channel has become the ivm ranting channel , bunch of crazies congregating
@@marknorris3769 Keep swallowing the official line and stay scared of actual treatments that work. Educate yourself because your vax status won't help you.
@@marknorris3769 stop ranting then you crazy loon.
@A Q Do you insist on seeing "randomised trial" data when you visit a doctor and he/she writes a prescription?
He is still staying with the failed drug. India has abandoned it because it simply didn't help.
Thank you for all that you do, Dr. Campbell.
Well done Doc, you are really knocking it out of the park with the last two vids. Thank you.
Go on as long as u need. Lots will listen to long form content. Don’t underestimate the value of this topic. We will watch every second bc it’s jam packed and backed with valid provable data. It’s wonderful work and u should be proud. Keep em coming!
Agree! I will listen to this subject at length it’s very important!
Yes, it's true: Ivermectin = eyeballs.
Even if it’s not IVM I personally will listen. to all of it. This doc seems to go over all the important things that revolve around covid. From vaccines to vitamin D. I like to be deeply informed on all the directions. The fact that this doctor corrects himself when necessary makes him one of my first go tos. Currently he is my first.
Dr Campbell, you are here for mankind. We've been following you in NZ since the start of the C pandemic . You are the most important contributor to real knowledge, the world's got be grateful for your efforts, Thank You so much, and keep well!
TLDR
This definitely needs keeping in the open. Clearly, if a cheap, existing, well tolerated, off the shelf drug is an effective prophylaxis then it is right to be asking, for example, why a course isn't given immediately to anyone in receipt of a positive PCR test.
If it was given back in July 2020 million of dollars million of people saved
As in India! Cut the $hit, Get the Kit : Ivermectin with vitamin supplements +
But that would rob the pharmaceutical companies of their massive profits that’s the bottom line lives don’t matter to these people only profit power and control.
Fauci and his ilk won't even urge people to take vitamin D. That should have been a no-brainer to anyone actually interested in ending the pandemic or even just slowing the spread. That in itself should tell everyone all they need to know about what's really going on.
$$$. Next question?
Absolute Legend Dr John. Very much "the good doctor" Thank you.
I hope there will be criminal trials for those in charge of medical care and protocols who knowingly withheld potentially life saving medication.
Agreed covid hit everyone dying knew about other drugs didn't put in mainstream then after everyone die they bring vaccine why not try anything as they had nothing bustards
John is a very, very smart guy. He knows how to get as close as possible to UA-cam censorship threshold without getting kicked out. Thank you doctor.
*EDIT*: Well it turns out John is not a medical doctor. The appropriation of the "dr" title is very misleading when discussing medical subjects.
? When would he even get close?
@@quecksilber457 Loads of videos have been kicked off for saying similiar things more broadly. Think of a channel that sounds like the equine a shade of midnight.
@@quecksilber457
He was prohibited from discussing HCQ quite early on, only managed a few brief segments in a couple of videos, regardless of simply presenting the studies
Makes me wonder if it's the drug companies asking for videos to be banned.
@@granddadpaul1491 Well it's not Sea Biscuit, is it.
I deeply appreciate the straight factual data we get from you John. The politicization of media (on both sides of the fence) here in the U.S. is pathetic and shameful.
It's not factual. The clinical trials he mentions were falsified and withdrawn. The only gold standard trial on ivermectin proved it to be no more effective than the placebo
@@lizjones2808 citations? Oh, you have none? Stfu
And that back n forth from both sides in media is probably done on purpose. And that just confuses most so its like you throw your hands in the air.
So much good info you can find that says yay. Then so much good info you find that says nay.
Smh
@@lizjones2808 The only true gold standard is truth. The best path of getting there is to constantly question and scientifically test what we label as fact. Science has become it's own religion complete with a set of dogma we dare not challenge lest we be labeled fools.
Then we have conspiracy being accepted as fact without the least bit of critical thinking. The so called scholars and the uneducated are both rejecting logic in slightly different ways.
The media knows this and they're getting rich playing everyone in the process. It's also destroying our country in the process. So, yeah, throw on a red shirt or a blue shirt and shut off your brain. The politicians know what's best for the children, right?
Thanks for your clarity and balanced reporting, as always.
You are amazing individual. God bless you, Dr. Robert Malone, and the countless health frontliners and scientists for your invaluable efforts in saving the lives and health of billions.
It may turn out to be a more effective drug but frankly the one that has an easier name to pronounce and doesn't make a hole in my pocket is my choice. Specially since I have successfully tested it.
Plus IVM does not generate changes in the DNA like hte monublablavir. :)
Did you have Covid? How did that go for you?
Actually, ivermectin IS the more effective drug.
My father took IVN and it didn't work. He died of covid.
@@annierocks8620 sorry for your loss
“The price will be based on what a county can afford . “ It’s like they are car salesman
Only 2.4 percent of people in third world countries are vaccinated. Western countries hoovered up the entire world’s vaccine supply. We outbid the poor and left them to perish so we could triple vax our healthy. This is worse than all of colonialism combined. We have created a humanitarian crisis throughout africa. Or maybe we just didnt need it?
🤔 If they have no 💰. They can get a loan. Or sell a kidney
@@terrythetuffkunt9215
- e outbid the poor and left them to perish
It is 1000% more deaths in UK compared to a poor country in Africa
@@terrythetuffkunt9215 The jabs are doing the damage.
@@kjell1087 so you mean the lockdowns and all the vaccines didnt work? OMG ARE YOU AN ANTI VAXER?!
I have 98 tablets of IVM on hand as well as all the other ingredients in the covid kits in india. I just read that india dropped molnupiravir because it shows no benefit.
Actually they dropped ivermectin from the kits. Molnupiravir is not yet approved or distributed.
@@JazzyScat no they didnt
@@mannysykes4416 the Times of India reported that they ordered it to be taken out.
Also 2 out of 8 drug makers dropped the generic version of molnupiravir in their trials because the were using it also on more severe cases instead of the recommended mild to moderate cases. The other 6 are still continuing their trials.
@@JazzyScat I’m not sure about moneypiravir but everything I’ve read about IVM seems to indicate that the key is starting the treatment at the first sign of illness. Waiting until severe pneumonia sets in is likely to be too late.
I wish you were my doctor buddy .I think your decency , medical and communication skills are superb.
Really? the guy is a nurse, his PhD is in nursing resourcing, he is not a medical doctor, check his about page. He is not qualified to prescribe these drugs.
Thank you for this report. We do need to look into all options honestly. Early treatments seem to lead to the best outcomes. The obvious campaign to stop the use of ivermectin has been very ridiculous. It's sad that we seem to only accept studies done by Giant Pharma. We need more independent research.
And only the vaccine news truth from tv channels that run 10 drug company ads an hour to pay to run the news, even pbs.
Not ridiculous. Criminal!
There is no such thing as independent research. Research is expensive, someone has to pay for it, and they influence the results (and the publication of them).
@@fig4159 exactly, but no independent "news" also, as even PBS public broadcasting system, has "sponsored" news and exactly now was the vaccine maker J@J..
Only because you are going to unreliable source and now Dr. Campbell is one of them. Truth is most studies, worth trusting never involve them, they typically involve multiple universities and hospitals and even multiple nations that have nothing to do with the medication. If Dr. Campbell wants to hunt for fake science he can find it.
Money speaks, BIG MONEY speaks loudly. The reticence by so called "medical authorities" to even discuss treatment options has been mind blowing. If big pharma can't make big money, discussion is off the table. Mistrust runs high when people see this.
Only 2.4 percent of people in third world countries are vaccinated. Western countries hoovered up the entire world’s vaccine supply. We outbid the poor and left them to perish so we could triple vax our healthy. This is worse than all of colonialism combined. We have created a humanitarian crisis throughout africa. Or maybe we just didnt need it?
@@terrythetuffkunt9215 Cut and paste much?
@@stache1954 yeah, thats how you get a message out. No one can tell me why africans dont need a vaccine.
@@terrythetuffkunt9215they might be the lucky ones to first develop herd immunity.
This whole thing is a money racket and has been from the start. Now that most people have already had the jabs - they are now targeting the "unvaccinated" with these drugs. It was predicted months ago widely on alternative media that a new expensive anti-viral would appear suddenly at around the time of the 3rd of 4th "vaccine" dose. Almost laughable how predictable these events become.
This presentation is packed with pharmaceutical information to demystify any public ignorance. Much appreciated
Amazing overview, thank you!
This channel and yours have been life savers. Thank you both
Thank you for this video Dr. Campbell.
Please make more videos about inaction of WHO on Ivermectin usage for covid.
Dr John Campbell, I apologise for my last comment on ( Antiviral Game Changer ) I was so infuriated at Merck claiming first officially approved Antiviral I hit the keyboard in a rage. Today you have given us another of your well balanced reports, I do follow you because throughout this pandemic yours has been the only voice of reason in the UK.
If Parliament was filled with men like you this really would be Great Britain. This report is music to my ears now so many will see the cruel deception that’s been going on by big Pharmaceutical Companies. Well done.
I’m pretty sure Merck manufacturers Ivermectin though
@@JellyBellyButter yes they do
@@JellyBellyButter "I’m pretty sure Merck manufacturers Ivermectin though" That is the reason for the rage.
Amen to Fred below. I appreciate Dr. Campbell's timely, concise and unbiased commentary on the pharmicological (sp) issues of our day. In the meantime the misinformation continues in the US and people continue to experience terrible effects from COVID-D needlessly.
Dr Campbell you have a wonderful capacity for diplomacy and tactful debate under the most extentuous circumstances.
Bravo! At last, an unbiased assessment of Ivermectin’s potential in treating Covid.
Its 40+ year safety record is equally unique and impressive.
Thank you, Dr. Campbell.
He did not say that! What he did was to give the results of a study into the efficacy of the treatment of long term Covid with Ivermectin. He then compared this with a German study which showed inconclusive evidence of efficacy in Ivermectin. Both were just two of the studies.
@@juliering3646 "inconclusive study" - probably designed that way by pro vaccine lobby..
@@indianmilitary So you didn't listen to the doctor? You also failed to look at the links to establish the sources. Well done!
@@indianmilitary Your own bias is showing.
Thanks for being a honest man. There are few of you, because most people with your knowledge puts a large price tag on their knowledge that they guard for profit.
I want to introduce you to something profitable, ⛔🤔✅🚀
⁺¹ ⁸⁵⁹ ⁵⁶⁷ ⁰³⁴²
Text on Whatsapp ⛔✅⛔🚀
@@richardbarkley1585 stop scamming
Thank you so much man. I hoping to share this with people to help them realize there isn't a one sized fits all approach.
Watched you from the get go!!! Very informative esp for the novice, you don’t go above my head thanks
An unvaccinated friend tested positive on Thursday morning, symptoms were increasing by the hour. She took Ivermectin (12mg) that evening and for the next 5 days. The day after IVM intervention symptoms started to decrease. By today (Tuesday) she's testing negative and symptom free.
That's a 5 day turnaround.
I'm glad your friend is doing great. I've know three friends who took nothing and recovered from covid.
@@timmyburden5701 In just five days?
@@billberna I'm not sure of the time. One was in a nursing home so her recovery took some time.
How can you rule out the possibility that your friend may have stabilized and recovered without the ivermectin? You have anecdotal speculation, not cause and effect proof of ivermectin's effect.
@@Kenjiro5775 You might do some research on what happened in Uddar Pradesh in India.
What an open, honest, factual delivery with zero bias. All backed by pure and undisputable data!!. FANTASTIC JOHN!! thank you
He is using an article that depends on the Elgazzar study which has since been retracted for plagiarism and because of significant inconsistencies in the data (significant enough that many believe the study never actually took place). That is hardly indisputable data.
@@travelingwithrebecca There are a lot of people that took IVM and feel it did not help them in managing covid, I believe these people, but it seems to be a minority opinion from patients real life experiences and doctors that actively prescribe it. Find me a doctor that has treated 400+ patients with Ivermectin and believes it doesn't work. It's definitely not a 100% miracle cure all drug. IVM is incredibly safe compared to most prescription drugs and its worth trying as a way to minimize the impact of covid.
@@MikeSmith-vy4wp Most doctors prescribing Ivermectin are prescribing it in addition to other treatments, making it impossible to tell if it was the Ivermectin that actually made the difference. Additionally, not all patients who are infected with COVID go on to develop severe disease so looking at any one individual who takes Ivermectin actually can't tell us anything about whether it actually works. They might have just had a case that would resolve itself on its own without intervention.
But really what you are talking about is the individual call of a doctor after weighing the specific risks and benefits of the drug to his or her patient. I'm responding to a video that is promoting the general use of Ivermectin based on faulty data. Any scientist or doctor making videos regarding the use of a drug should be using legitimate studies and data to not mislead viewers. And any Ivermectin study or research paper that depends on the the Elgazzar study is not legitimate.
I've got to say the hours dr john puts in is amazing best from Glasgow scotland stay safe gloria
@@wboyle9721 yes indeed, dedicated to his mission to help as much as possible, in an open and unbiased way, for all of us to have up to date researched information. .His videos are part of my evening ritual and have been for almost 2 years now
Wow...after watching a few of your very important informative videos I see you are all about the true science and I just want to say the public Is very lucky to have someone like you Dr Campbell we need more honest healers like you that follow the science 😀 thank you
We also more scientists to follow the science!
Thank you for sharing your medical expertise doc John Campbell
Ivermectin seems to accidentally do everything needed to deal with COVID.
Not just covid, it may prevent certain cancers.
No - it was only rumored to. India has given up on it because it simply doesn't work in real life.
Yes lots of cancers, West Nile virus etc.
@@flagmichael Who is telling you this nonsense?
@@epicchannel4724 lol you idiot it this came from the Indian Covid Task Force and the body responsible for what is prescribed for Covid. Look it up and stop talking nonsense yourself.
I predicted this video today, after your report from yesterday. It would be very interesting to compare the active ingredients of the 2 drugs….. thanks for keeping on top of this evolving situation/scandal John!
Yes, true SCANDAL!
Ay formulations required cos i think it's just a patentable IVM
Non scientific educated guess...
Molnupiravir is just a combination of Ivermectin and NAC (N-Acetylcysteine)
@@Reelfurniture Molnupiravir is a Nucleoside Analogue which is not at all similar to Ivermectin. If anything, Molnupiravir is more similar to Remdesevir.
The upcoming Pfizer pill is closer to Ivermectin insofar as both are referred to as Protease Inhibitors.
It is interesting to note that Remdesevir received EUA Authorization after a tiny trial which was cut short when it was found to potentially reduce the length of a hospital stay (with no impact on mortality reduction). I am sure Molnupiravir will follow the same short-circuiting process as Remdesivir because Fauci has already placed a large purchase order for the stuff under his "Friends Of Big Pharma" policy.
Dr Campbell, thank you very, very much for your breaking down information for us civilians. You are greatly appreciated for your translations.
From the Chicagoland suburbs
(Your downunders).
TTFN.
Appreciate the honest and easy to understand evaluation of the data. Thanks.
Thank you for your incredible service, Dr. Campbell.
There must be some Prize someone can give this man... thanks for the job you doing Dr. Campbell
Thank you for your non bias review and opinions. This is more of what the word needs! List the pros and cons as we know them. Tom multiple reliable sources.
This is another excellent video from John. I always wonder if he will be taken down for his courage and honesty.
Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)
Retired surgeon
It's interesting to note that MERK'S claim that it is effective against most variants is based small deposits of people from all over the world, that make up the 775 (?) in the study. Seems like jumping the gun a bit. The Merk study was very dubious. $700 per course is a bit dubious too.
An average worker in a Third World underdeveloped country doesn't even earn $ 700 in a year. Imagine him being forced to pay that much for this drug if he comes down with Covid........
How much do you think Pfizer, J & J, Merderna is charging for the vaccine??? About $700 for 2 doses
@@chuckalleman2101 if this is true, then it's not exactly cheap, let alone free 😬
@@chuckalleman2101 Pfizer is actually closer to $20. Why make shit up.
@@brandenburg2388 they'll charge that price in the US. They negotiated that price with the Biden administration. MERCK said that it will allow generic drug companies to make this new drug cheaper for 3rd world countries. So Merck is purposely ripping off American taxpayers who subsidized 35 million$ for the development of this new drug
pennies for one and mega dollars for the other. Guess which one the drs will be allowed to prescribe
Right, It’s disgusting!
My guess is the Practice, will get a %
UK heath center s are not like they use to be. TRUSTS.
Merek made both, but ivermectin is no longer under patent, so other countries can make it cheap.
@@televisionarchivestudios1130 It would sure help if you would say which statement was not true
in the US doctors can prescribe what they want. How about a nice trial to prove IVM works. My money is on fluvoxamine.
Thank you! Bless you and your tireless efforts!
Thank you. Good to get your honest opinion with facts and explanations
If you look up “ mutagen” in the dictionary it says cancer. Our cells also require healthy rna to function. Introducing a rna error making mutagen/killer to our body on purpose sounds kind of scary.
I've seen it doesnt interfere with RNA, but DNA - even scarier.
Hey, they said effective. Only time will tell on the safe part. But yeah when someone tells me to eat a mutagenic im wondering does this need a California Prop 65 warning? Im not saying eating mutagenics is bad. Im a big proponent of mutagenics in fact and ate 3 today, but with that said. If this where ebola? yeah give me a hand full of that mutagenic. I dont think you recover from ebola. So if for some reason you dont use all your doses for covid you have some mutagenic laying around for ebola. is the fact it has mutagenic in its title mean it's 100% a bad idea? Perhaps its a great idea because we've factored repair enzymes and the complications that arise from Eigan's paradox. But they call that a paradox for a reason.
19:17 - A very polite message from JC to the zombie population: "I will leave you to think about that for a little while..." 😂🤣
Is the zombie population the Vaxxed then you think.. 😳😬🤦🏻♂️🤣😂🤣💯
@Gay Hickey Get ready for your boosters. It’s mandated for everyone in Israel now and Australia is always 6 months behind that part of the world. Have fun and hope you make it to 2023. Good luck with you jabbing👍
One other *possible* issue with Molnupiravir (especially since the testing was curtailed) is that its ability to disrupt RNA in the virus, *might* promote the acceleration of the rate of new variants.
No . It stops viral replication. Variants arise with increasing probability the more replications are allowed to happen. Variants have to be capable of self replicating
Does it cause cancer?
@@tonykelpie Molupiravir's mechanism of action is to induce so many mutations in the virus that it destroys itself. However, the concern is if lower doses or an incomplete regimen of molnupiravir are given, it can create viable escape variants. A prominent virologist, William Haseltine has speculated that Omicron formed in a South African COVID-19 patient who was taking molnupiravir given the number and types of mutations.
@@youregoddamnright many speculations exist.
@@youregoddamnright antiviral drugs do not work by promoting mutations; they inhibit replication. Mutations are most likely where unrestricted replication takes place.
Good job Dr Campbell. Glad you talked about this,
Thank you for the link to Wefwafwa and his work. Very good solid cause. I feel my portion has fallen in pleasant places and it does us good to be able to help where there is greater need.
Dr. John, you and Wefwafwa are doing an amazing job. I'm sure you're impacting these few families and communities greatly. I wonder if he managed to get his vaccine yet. Anyway, great reporting on the two therapeutics especially ivermectin. Leadership should not deny the masses life-saving medications especially when studies have been done to show ivermectins potential to prevent serious illness and death. I'm saying all this as a fully vaccinated individual as well.
Thank you so much for plain speak. God bless.
Thanks Dr. John for your cadent information.
A few months ago there was news about a team from Oxford doing a study on Ivermectin. It seems to have been fully subscribed, but no further information has been forthcoming.
I recently searched for it and found some online criticism of the protocol, which involved 6 mg daily for 3 days very soon after a positive PCR test. With an 81 hour half life for Ivermectin in the system, I didn't consider that criticism held much water. It seemed to me at the time to be a safe protocol. I don't recall where I found the half life data, but it does align with what you quoted.
It would be nice to know where the team is at with regards to publication. I am sure you will report when they publish.
Thanks for your coverage of this subject.
6mg that’s far too low to be effective that is designed to fail
@@masonstorm1834 In most studies thats what they do, Its like when they first said (and still does) that vit d has no effects
Participants could be up to 14 days after symptoms, so that also doesn't make sense for an early treatment study. Merck's study was a maximum of 5 days of symptoms.
@@ianwinter100 hmm sounds suspicious
Probably as brits and those few able to make everything wrong they still fixing their studies by list of reviews of what and where they did everything wrong.
"let's bury our patent free antiviral and make a new one, you know? For money" -MERCK.
If 1cent of federal funds goes into a patten the Federal Government owns 50 % of it and can control the cost!!!!! But no one enforces any NIH rules!!!!
The intercept has said it’s at a 40x markup to cost of making too haha
They haven't buried anything. As its patent free, anyone can make it and do their own trials. Stop spouting utter Bullshit.
@@MichaelGGarry Yea but a lot of countries such as Australia will put doctors in prison for prescribing ivermectin so stop with your bullshit......good man
@@MichaelGGarry he said PATENT free, read carefully.
Excellent work Doctor. Much appreciated!
Your best show ever...thanks Dr Campbell