Depends how much trimming you want to do and the wider definitely eats more gas! What do you think of 295/70/17? I ran those on my previous 4R which took a lot of trimming but looked 🔥
Running a 37x12.50 17 Toyo Open Country RT Trail on my 2020 Power Wagon. Stock suspension with tires mounted on a Method MR315 17x8.5 with +25mm offset. Have about 10000 miles on them and love them so far. Great on road and fantastic off road!
I’ve ran Cooper STT pro, BFG and Yokohama G003. I prefer the BFG and Cooper only because they seem to run wider and give it that stance I’m looking for. When I put on the Yokohama G003 in 35’s they looked slimmer but taller which I didn’t like.
Got an interesting one. Lifting a 2016 Cherokee 3in lift, KL is the body style 1 1/2 from springs 1 1/2 from spacers,no quadralift system. Shop is recommending LT275/70R17, I wanted an LT285/70 r17 or at least hope I can get that as my next set when I've had a few minor horsepower upgrades. Going to be running BFG all-terrain KO3 on a rim with a + 25 MM offset (factory rim is + 55). Supposedly both those tire sizes are 32's, 32.3 and 32.7. I think the shops concern is possibly the tire hitting the control arm or something in the steering? Definitely using this for off-road, do you think I would be able to run the 285? Was originally hoping to put on 33 inch tires but they pretty much saying thats a for sure no go. Wondering what you would recommend as the largest size I could get. Also running this is a daily driver, was trying not to regear anything.
@@garrettarendsen7465 that’s a tough call but it should fit especially if you stay conservative on the wheel offset. Have you tried looking at the Chevy forums?
I have a 2020 tundra i'm looking at 295/70/18......wondering how much difference there is between that size and a 35x12.5 in a BFG all terrain? I have heard those run small. I'm currently running a 275/65/20 on my stock suspension/rim
He acts like he doesn't understand why the 285/65r18 is wider than the 285/75r17. The middle number is a percentage of the first. So if you have a smaller middle number, you still have 285mm, so the tire gets wider. And they're still close to same height because the wheel is bigger in the 285/65.
Actually you have half of it correct. The first number, 285 in this situation, is the width in mm, the next number is the tire’s aspect ratio, which essentially tells you how tall your tire’s profile is: Aspect ratios are delivered in percentages. Tire makers calculate the aspect ratio by dividing a tire’s height off the rim by its width. If a tire has an aspect ratio of 70, it means the tire’s height is 70% of its width. So yes this is why I was so surprised the 285mm Mickey is way wider than the Yokohama with the same stated width
@@everydaybettereverydaystronger yes, but the reason why one 285 is wider than the other is because the aspect ratio is different. Smaller aspect ratio with the same width (285) means a wider tire.
@@JLC8504 the aspect ratio refers to the height of the sidewall from rim to top of the tire measuring in the percent of the width. The width of a 285 stays the same regardless of aspect ratio. For example a 285/70R17 is a tire with a width of 285mm. The measurement from rim OD to the top of the tire is 70% of 285mm. Radial tire, and on a 17" wheel. So a 285/70R17 and a 285/65R18 are exactly the same size (on paper). The side wall will be smaller in height because there's more wheel OD now. Again, aspect ratio has zero to do with width
@@Clanc54R He proved what I'm saying in the video. The 285/65 is wider than the 285/75. If you take a 285/75r17 and a 285/70r17, the 285/75 will be taller and slightly narrower than the 285/70.
@@JLC8504 that's just different manufacturing dude. Different brands. You literally have the internet. Look up "Tire Aspect Ratio." I'm done arguing with stupid here
Keep the tire comparison videos coming! Would love to see a 305/70/17 compared to a 285/75/17, as i’m still debating what to go with on my taco
They will be the same height, but 305 will wider.
Depends how much trimming you want to do and the wider definitely eats more gas! What do you think of 295/70/17? I ran those on my previous 4R which took a lot of trimming but looked 🔥
Running a 37x12.50 17 Toyo Open Country RT Trail on my 2020 Power Wagon. Stock suspension with tires mounted on a Method MR315 17x8.5 with +25mm offset. Have about 10000 miles on them and love them so far. Great on road and fantastic off road!
@@Buck795 Power Wagon! Nice choices and thanks for sharing 🍻
I’ve ran Cooper STT pro, BFG and Yokohama G003. I prefer the BFG and Cooper only because they seem to run wider and give it that stance I’m looking for. When I put on the Yokohama G003 in 35’s they looked slimmer but taller which I didn’t like.
Seeing comparison between 255 and 265, possibly 275 aswell in 16in or 17in would be great
@@zapcodeknock4503 sorry but we haven’t had those three all in at the same time but they’re very minimal between each with it being 10mm of width
@@everydaybettereverydaystronger it's fine. I think im starting to distinguish 275's since the 265 is so common. Ill watch your uploads
Have you installed many 255/85/17’s on 4Runners or Tacomas? Thanks!
For my 2020 jeep gladiator overland without lift how big tire I can put currently run with 255/70/18
I've seen and heard 35s without any lift
Can you tell me the biggest 285/70/17 ?
Got an interesting one. Lifting a 2016 Cherokee 3in lift, KL is the body style 1 1/2 from springs 1 1/2 from spacers,no quadralift system. Shop is recommending LT275/70R17, I wanted an LT285/70 r17 or at least hope I can get that as my next set when I've had a few minor horsepower upgrades. Going to be running BFG all-terrain KO3 on a rim with a + 25 MM offset (factory rim is + 55). Supposedly both those tire sizes are 32's, 32.3 and 32.7. I think the shops concern is possibly the tire hitting the control arm or something in the steering? Definitely using this for off-road, do you think I would be able to run the 285? Was originally hoping to put on 33 inch tires but they pretty much saying thats a for sure no go. Wondering what you would recommend as the largest size I could get. Also running this is a daily driver, was trying not to regear anything.
285 will be too big bro unless you run a much higher suspension
I’m putting a 2 inch leveling kit on my 2015 Silverado I’m hoping 285/75/17 bfgs will fit in their perfectly with no rubbing
@@garrettarendsen7465 that’s a tough call but it should fit especially if you stay conservative on the wheel offset. Have you tried looking at the Chevy forums?
我很喜欢窄胎，一直想把我 Bronco 的 315\70R17换成 255\80R18 左右的轮胎，但是中国窄的34-35 吋胎基本没有🤧
@@half-way narrow is the way to go! Better MPG than wide tires and retains some power from the motor
I have a 2020 tundra i'm looking at 295/70/18......wondering how much difference there is between that size and a 35x12.5 in a BFG all terrain? I have heard those run small. I'm currently running a 275/65/20 on my stock suspension/rim
Which 295/70R18 you thinking? The BFG AT do run slightly small
A nitto ridge grabbler...315x70x17 what's the actual sizes in width, and height vs the nitto ridge grabbler 35x12.5x17
Sorry we don't have both in stock but from seeing them on Nitto's website the 35 is slightly taller and narrower but way heavier
I run 37's... it's easy on a Jeep.
@@adrianw3985 yes it certainly seems to be, especially with clearance! Which Jeep you driving and did you regear? I’ve been eyeing a Gladiator
@everydaybettereverydaystronger 5.13's are pretty popular for 37's.
@@everydaybettereverydaystronger a Gladiator
@@adrianw3985wish there was an option to attach pics here
He acts like he doesn't understand why the 285/65r18 is wider than the 285/75r17. The middle number is a percentage of the first. So if you have a smaller middle number, you still have 285mm, so the tire gets wider. And they're still close to same height because the wheel is bigger in the 285/65.
Actually you have half of it correct. The first number, 285 in this situation, is the width in mm, the next number is the tire’s aspect ratio, which essentially tells you how tall your tire’s profile is: Aspect ratios are delivered in percentages. Tire makers calculate the aspect ratio by dividing a tire’s height off the rim by its width. If a tire has an aspect ratio of 70, it means the tire’s height is 70% of its width. So yes this is why I was so surprised the 285mm Mickey is way wider than the Yokohama with the same stated width
@@everydaybettereverydaystronger yes, but the reason why one 285 is wider than the other is because the aspect ratio is different. Smaller aspect ratio with the same width (285) means a wider tire.
@@JLC8504 the aspect ratio refers to the height of the sidewall from rim to top of the tire measuring in the percent of the width. The width of a 285 stays the same regardless of aspect ratio. For example a 285/70R17 is a tire with a width of 285mm. The measurement from rim OD to the top of the tire is 70% of 285mm. Radial tire, and on a 17" wheel. So a 285/70R17 and a 285/65R18 are exactly the same size (on paper). The side wall will be smaller in height because there's more wheel OD now. Again, aspect ratio has zero to do with width
@@Clanc54R He proved what I'm saying in the video. The 285/65 is wider than the 285/75. If you take a 285/75r17 and a 285/70r17, the 285/75 will be taller and slightly narrower than the 285/70.
@@JLC8504 that's just different manufacturing dude. Different brands. You literally have the internet. Look up "Tire Aspect Ratio." I'm done arguing with stupid here