XL Nebula Class USS Bonchune Eaglemoss Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 сер 2021
  • Main Website:
    www.trekyards.com
    Support Trekyards on Patreon:
    / community
    PayPal Support via: trekyards@hotmail.com
    Want cool Trekyards Merchandise? Check out our TeeSpring store:
    teespring.com/stores/trekyard...
    or the new TeePublic Store: www.teepublic.com/stores/trek...
    Trekyards on Twitter:
    / trekyards
    Trekyards Discord Server: / discord
    Eaglemoss Link: click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/...
    Discount Code: TREKYARDS10 for 10% off your order
    Star Trek Mission Crate discount link: lootcrate.com/trekyards
    Discount code: TREKYARDS to save 10% off your order
    Other UA-cam Channel:
    Captain Foley's Channel
    / @stuartfoleycaptainfoley
    Social Media:
    Trekyards on Twitter:
    / trekyards
    Main Trekyards Facebook Page:
    / trekyards
    Main Fleetyards Facebook Page:
    / fleetyards
    Trekyards Model Building Showcase Facebook Page:
    / 525656090901951
    Team Trekyards Star Trek Online Facebook Group:
    / teamtrekyards
    Star Trek Timelines (Trekyards Facebook Team Page):
    / 836643756447057
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 68

  • @TheRealThunder
    @TheRealThunder 2 роки тому +9

    At 2:09 regarding Specs... The only thing accurate, is that it's a Nebula Class.
    The true length is 442 meters. It was launched in the 2350s/2360s. Not 100 years earlier. It's a much smaller ship than the Galaxy Class which DID have a crew of about 1000 people, but would likely have considerably less than the above listed 1,012.

    • @rolandogamez
      @rolandogamez 2 роки тому

      Source?

    • @johnbockelie3899
      @johnbockelie3899 2 роки тому +1

      The lower decks people wear sunglasses due to the warp engines right outside the windows. Also have suntan because of the flash from the warp engines.

    • @johnbockelie3899
      @johnbockelie3899 2 роки тому

      The " Poor man's " Galaxy class.

    • @misha5670
      @misha5670 2 роки тому +2

      @@rolandogamez Logic; Nebula & Galaxy saucers are the same size/scale. But the Galaxy's stardrive extends out much further. For both to have the same overall length, the Nebula would then have to have a much larger saucer than the Galaxy. In the Wounded, this is not the case. Just as the Miranda is smaller than the Constitution, the Nebula is smaller than the Galaxy. The Nebula is a 'Medium' cruiser.

    • @misha5670
      @misha5670 2 роки тому +2

      Thank you, I am a numbers person and that just bugged me.

  • @StarTrekMarco
    @StarTrekMarco 2 роки тому +3

    Only thing I really do hate about that model is the way the display stand is holding it. After a few weeks now, the warp engine pylons have bent so that the warp engines are facing upwards permanently. It's like those old resin models, where everything bend down during summer heatwaves.

  • @tmseh
    @tmseh 2 роки тому +7

    Eaglemoss really should make an XL Borg Cube, to scale. Hasbro is making some big stuff!

    • @johnbockelie3899
      @johnbockelie3899 2 роки тому

      The flaw on the magazine is the launch date. 2263 ? , should be 2363.
      2263 is in the 23rd century.

  • @SuperLegacyGT
    @SuperLegacyGT 2 роки тому

    A wonderful presentation of the Nebula class. Thank you Captain. It's always greatly appreciated. As always, thank you for all you do with Star Trek.

  • @slicerneons3300
    @slicerneons3300 2 роки тому +2

    A very nice design. Would like to buy the model for my dad, once he has room in his garage to display it.

  • @pakese30
    @pakese30 2 роки тому

    Nebula Class is one of my faves from TNG/DS9 era, definitely be getting one of these.

  • @simonwillis1529
    @simonwillis1529 2 роки тому

    Can’t wait for your stargate eaglemoss reviews now

  • @hansebee
    @hansebee 2 роки тому

    Ive had this puppy for a week now, the pylon attachment for the stand does fit, but the heavy weight of that metal saucer did bend the plastic pylon assembly quite a bit - the saucer now slopes forward when the model sits flatly on a desk. I really hope simply having the big Nebby on its stand doesnt do permanent damage.
    Btw this model - according to youtube comparisons but NOT to Eaglemoss webpage detail specs - should be in scale with the XL Ent-D, even if the saucer mold is NOT the same as many might think.

  • @TheColonelSassacre
    @TheColonelSassacre 2 роки тому +1

    I always thought the door thing in the back was the (otherwise missing) impulse engine behind a baffle plate.

  • @callumwearne7870
    @callumwearne7870 2 роки тому

    Love both classes the tng era has a really beautiful symmetry and minimalism to it which ages really well compared to some other sci-fi designs

  • @stevenewman1393
    @stevenewman1393 Рік тому +1

    🖖😎👍Very nicely well done and informatively executed and explained indeed, And I own all of the various Nebula class ships from Eaglemoss as well 👌.

  • @guardian1326
    @guardian1326 2 роки тому

    My favorite bridge for the nebula class was from DS9 season two episode Second Sight. The USS Prometheus.

  • @seanoneill9606
    @seanoneill9606 2 роки тому

    That's a good model. I didn't realise the nebula class was that long.

  • @ozziemederos
    @ozziemederos 2 роки тому +2

    Deanna crash the saucer after the Duras sisters 👯‍♀️ destroyed the drive section by using Geordii‘s visor

    • @ensignmjs7058
      @ensignmjs7058 2 роки тому

      Poor writing.

    • @johnbockelie3899
      @johnbockelie3899 2 роки тому

      Deana Troi crashing the saucer , Geordi's visor, .......all led to Geordi getting those optical implants.

  • @jefferygeter4998
    @jefferygeter4998 2 роки тому

    Nebula class is a sub class of the Galaxy class that what you meant to say I think the nebula class in some
    Ways is a lot more powerful when it's to fire power.

  • @ozziemederos
    @ozziemederos 2 роки тому +1

    Awesome job on the video today

  • @dezbogdanyi1859
    @dezbogdanyi1859 2 роки тому

    Nice model! Awesome job on the vid 😉

  • @msbae
    @msbae 2 роки тому +1

    They got the launch date wrong. It should say something more like 2363, not 2263.

  • @swilliams1000
    @swilliams1000 2 роки тому

    miss-print on the book, not 2263 the construction date is 2363 or a year (+,-). Capt i would think you would have noticed that?

  • @wargodsix
    @wargodsix 2 роки тому

    Nebula is one of my fave I like it more then the galaxy soon as they add the Ross variant to the variants on sto I’ll be getting a nebula

  • @firebirdone03
    @firebirdone03 2 роки тому

    Nebula class ships don't fallow the Miranda class ship design principles at all because the Nebula has a secondary hull and Miranda class ships have impulse engines.

  • @anthonylowder6687
    @anthonylowder6687 2 роки тому

    In the photo you said that a Galaxy class ship was being attacked by the Prometheus....it's not a Galaxy class but a Nebula class ship.
    Time index 8:08-8:12.
    Would love to see an XL U.S.S. CERRITOS (did l spell that right?) from Lower Decks.

  • @cazgreg1
    @cazgreg1 2 роки тому

    Was there any size comparison with the XL nebula class and the standard size of the other classes like the saber class or the orbeth class?

  • @terrywindsor1310
    @terrywindsor1310 2 роки тому

    Wasn't there a Nebula class at the end of Star Trek Generations about to break orbit from Veridian 3? Nevermind, you just answered my question. BTW, i thought the pod was way cool, thinking that HAS got to be one hell of a sensor suite! Cheers!

  • @hi-q2261
    @hi-q2261 2 роки тому

    I'm a big fan of the nebula class there's just one problem with it how do the shuttles get into the shuttle bay 😟 that massive pod system on top of the ship tends to get in the way

  • @theMaDNesS201
    @theMaDNesS201 2 роки тому

    very very nice ship, always a fan of the nebula. however that ship isn't 641m thats the galaxy size i thought the nebula was like 460, around the same size as the excelsior

  • @rolandogamez
    @rolandogamez 2 роки тому

    Did Sternbach or Bonchune ever explain the lack of Impulse Engines?

  • @Nebula1701
    @Nebula1701 2 роки тому +5

    I'm getting tired of Eaglemoss using the horrible 3D kitbash version of the Nebula class.... I want a proper Phoenix and Farragut.... with properly designed secondary hull (it's much thicker than the one on the Galaxy) and fewer rows of windows on the upper saucer....

    • @jonuiuc
      @jonuiuc 2 роки тому +2

      I did like that original secondary hull, and I liked the lack of windows, it implied a smaller scale. While their at it they should increase the bridge size too, show the saucer was smaller than a galaxy saucer, as was originally intended, something a happy medium between New Orleans and Galaxy (not 1:1 galaxy saucer).

    • @Nebula1701
      @Nebula1701 2 роки тому

      @@jonuiuc The Saucer wasn't actually overall Smaller per say, it still had the same number of Decks and the same bridge module just setup differently internally. The saucer however, was smaller in oval circumference/diameter. If you look on the side of the saucer the Sensor ridge is taller.

    • @rolandogamez
      @rolandogamez 2 роки тому

      @@Nebula1701 That's because its based on the 4ft model, not the 6ft Galaxy Model.

    • @Nebula1701
      @Nebula1701 2 роки тому

      @@rolandogamez yes but it’s even different than the 4ft

    • @rolandogamez
      @rolandogamez 2 роки тому

      @@Nebula1701 I'm listening. Are we going with real world or in universe stats?

  • @NeoTechni
    @NeoTechni 2 роки тому

    I want one, Nebula was my favorite class till the Sovereign
    I have the small Nebula they put out but it was horrible quality. The nacelles weren't even straight!

  • @davidhernandez9985
    @davidhernandez9985 2 роки тому

    De best looking starship ever I bet it can smoke up into warp 10!

  • @samuelnason8585
    @samuelnason8585 2 роки тому

    where is the inpulse drives?

  • @inmatejason
    @inmatejason 2 роки тому

    i always loved the look of the nebula class for some reason, nebula, defiant, and enterprise c are my favorites. I hate the look of the new uss discovery.

  • @r.a.o.c.2592
    @r.a.o.c.2592 2 роки тому

    Lower Decks! USS Temecula! We are crazy, sexy wine drinking party animals!

  • @Howlrunner82
    @Howlrunner82 2 роки тому +1

    So...Impulse engines?

  • @wargodsix
    @wargodsix 2 роки тому

    Maybe the crew is 1000 and senior staff is 12 lol possibly would make sense

  • @keonisan
    @keonisan 2 роки тому +1

    The Nebula is one of my favorite designs, I just wish they had a variant with integrated nacelles along the secondary hull (like the defiant). Put on the ablative armor and pack that thing with so many torpedo launchers and phaser banks. Make it a battleship.

  • @MoparNewport
    @MoparNewport 8 місяців тому

    Always amazes me how many models just cannot get the Nebula class correct. Where. Are. The. Impulse Engines? Its not hard, its a stock Galaxy saucer, those engines are still there, plus the main at the back of the secondary, and this model has none of them. Oi. Too bad. Sad part is they want over 100$ for a model that aint correct. Also, not to totally nerd out ,but, 10:56, those are supposed to be auxilary navigational deflector emitters, not observation. Those nacelles are very poorly attached too, bad gaps between nacelle and pylon. Very sad.

  • @kaboodlefish
    @kaboodlefish 2 роки тому

    Appreciate Cap for doing the video, they're always interesting. But as ever, disappointed by the quality of the product. The structure of the ships is malformed, there's gaping holes where pieces don't fit together properly, some places it looks like the pieces have been twisted off the sprue leaving horrible surface wounds and there's countless pieces of misaligned paintwork. For the 20 buck ships that's fine, but for the XLs.. I guess I just expect a bit more care for around 100 bucks.

  • @fedricojgarza464
    @fedricojgarza464 2 роки тому

    Very nice 😍❤

  • @djayk9692
    @djayk9692 2 роки тому

    Am I the ONLY one who wants an Eaglemoss of the USS Achilles from the PC game Dominion Wars? The ship design was amazing!! It’ll always be my most favorite non-canon…canon ship. Seen here in the opening credits of the original game ua-cam.com/video/l-ICRW5-ygA/v-deo.html

  • @swnews4u161
    @swnews4u161 2 роки тому

    Not seeing impulse engines

  • @simonwillis1529
    @simonwillis1529 2 роки тому

    Ain’t she beautiful I was impressed with mine

  • @tetsubo57
    @tetsubo57 2 роки тому

    I just find those right angle pylon supports so darn ugly. Also probably impractical.

  • @pedrorosario1778
    @pedrorosario1778 2 роки тому +1

    Ok..WHERE ARE THE IMPULSE ENGINES??? Cmon Eaglemoss...all this $ and you drop the pooch!

    • @kaboodlefish
      @kaboodlefish 2 роки тому

      Where are you expecting to see impulse engines?

    • @rolandogamez
      @rolandogamez 2 роки тому

      @@kaboodlefish Locially, two one the primary, and one on that big strut?

    • @kaboodlefish
      @kaboodlefish 2 роки тому +2

      @@rolandogamez Maybe logically, but the onscreen Nebula didn't have any visible impulse engines. So.. Seem a tab harsh to blame Eaglemoss for sticking to what was on screen.

    • @rolandogamez
      @rolandogamez 2 роки тому

      @@kaboodlefish I've actually asked Sternbach about that. Never did get an answer.

    • @kaboodlefish
      @kaboodlefish 2 роки тому

      @@rolandogamez I did remember him saying that impulse engine don't actually need the glowy red 'outlets'. E.G. Voyager used impulse engines to however when doing planetary landings. So the thrust isn't coming from those red bits.

  • @treguard1982
    @treguard1982 2 роки тому

    You'll never get the same detail as you do on the Star Trek Modellers group, but this doesn't look too bad. It still has a bit of a chinese-y look to it though in parts.

  • @ozziemederos
    @ozziemederos 2 роки тому

    Awesome job on the video today