You Don't Know Time
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 лип 2020
- Subscribe to Neil deGrasse Tyson's StarTalk: • "What is Knowledge?" w...
Get The Curiosity Box: www.curiositybox.com/
Huge thanks to Neil deGrasse Tyson and everyone at StarTalk!
It seems easy to know things. The basics of epistemology haven’t changed much since Plato’s time, and we navigate every minute of our lives using a system of justified true belief. If we’re justified in thinking something, that thing is true, and we believe it, then it’s knowledge.
But as Gettier Problems show us, sometimes that justified true belief model just doesn’t work. We can satisfy every condition of JTB and still not know something.
So if that system isn’t reliable, then how can we really know anything at all? It’s a philosophical problem so big that we need Neil deGrasse Tyson to sort it out.
Neil deGrasse Tyson of StarTalk sets the record straight on what knowledge really is. Science, he says, is filled with things we can truly know with confidence. Sometimes they’re things we can count; other times we just hit a limit on how useful knowledge is to humanity.
The way we view knowledge in our collaborative endeavors sets the tone for how we go about life itself -- and puts us in the best possible position to know more and progress with math, science, and humanity.
... and we FINALLY find out whether a hot dog is a sandwich.
Thumbnail: @Stafoh
Phone idea by great-haired genius Jake Roper
** SOURCES **
Edmund Gettier: "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?" fitelson.org/proseminar/gettie...
Simon DeDeo’s Twitter: / simondedeo
Stephen Hetherington: "Knowledge and the Gettier Problem" www.cambridge.org/core/books/...
Borges, Almeida, and Klein: "Explaining Knowledge: New Essays on the Getting Problem" www.oxfordscholarship.com/vie...
W. V. Quine, “The Ways of the Paradox and Other Essays” www.amazon.com/Ways-Paradox-O...
Roger Shattuck, “Forbidden Knowledge” www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Know...
Brian Gallagher, “This Simple Philosophical Puzzle Shows How Difficult It Is to Know Something” nautil.us/blog/-this-simple-ph...
** LINKS **
Vsauce2:
Twitter: / vsaucetwo
Facebook: / vsaucetwo
Talk Vsauce2 in The Create Unknown Discord: / discord
Hosted and Produced by Kevin Lieber
Instagram: / kevlieber
Twitter: / kevinlieber
Podcast: / thecreateunknown
Research and Writing by Matthew Tabor
/ tabortcu
Editing by John Swan
/ @johnswanyt
Huge Thanks To Paula Lieber
www.etsy.com/shop/Craftality
Select Music by Basswaite: linktr.ee/Basswaite
Select Music By Jake Chudnow: / jakechudnow
Get Vsauce's favorite science and math toys delivered to your door!
www.curiositybox.com/
Get Vsauce2’s Woven Math t-shirts/hoodies: represent.com/store/vsauce2
#NeildeGrasseTyson #vsauce2 #StarTalk
Vsauce "RIGHT"
Me a veteran subscriber "WRONG"
Vsauce "WR-sometimes"
Me crying in a corner
Soo mee lmao
A dark corner at that
same
Chanel Change
ua-cam.com/video/9dDOGF4oeuQ/v-deo.html
Me or is it?
Vsauce 1: Or is it?
Vsauce 2: Right?
Vsauce 3: (I don’t think Jake has one)
WRONG
Lol
Vsauce 4: SPAGHETTI!
@@yeahuh4128 r/iamveryrandom
@@Dan-vb7lz I don't think so
Neil deGrasse Tyson: I have vowed to never fight about the definition of a word
Pluto: ._.
Read this right at this happened. 3 comments so far I have read right as the video got to that moment
@@shilohplus4898 same
I was expecting you to go, "WRONG! This isn't a cat, this is a piece of plastic moulded in the shape of a cat"
So you managed to get me anyways
And then he shows the actual cat and says "WRONG AGAIN, this is just pixels in the shape of a cat... and even if it wasn't, it's just a group of atoms in the shape of a cat... WHAT IS A CAT!?!??"
I mean technically the cat appeared in the video when he announced the cat was always in the video thus he is wrong
It felt weird not hearing him scream “WRONG”
right? WRONG!
I cringed when he said "Right? Wr... Sometimes" XD
yeah, me too (1:25)
Yeah, I missed that too
same
This has got to be the only timeline where Neil deGrasse Tyson confirms the definition of a hot dog.
I mean he’s been on Joe Rogan a lot so there is definitely a timeline where they talk about that
@@lucatartaglia4007 L
Box_Tart haha I forgot about that second time where I doubt joe got a sentence in
A hot dog clearly isn't a sandwich: It uses only one piece of bread, rather than two, and it isn't sliced bread. Both of those would already, individually, disqualify it. (also, who calls hot dog sausages hot dogs? It's not a hot dog, if it doesn't have a bun. The sausage is either a Wiener or Frankfurter)
@@theprofessionalfence-sitter You can make a sandwich with only one piece of bread. Also, username does not check out.
Hahaha I got a neil degrasse tyson masterclass ad right after the “hello?”
Me too! :)
I got one fora how to book for hooking up with people that’s cool proof I skipped it and next word “wrong” hahaha made me giggle even more
He is lying piece of turd.
Same
Same
Kevin: quick PICK HEADS OR TAILS! GO!
me: *scared* Hails
I want know
Same here bro XD
Teads
Theailds
The side of the quarter has a non-zero chance of landing.
I can't believe Neil has a landline
It's okay to have a landline ✅
He's old school.
@@itsraahul Hahaha good one
I mean, I wouldn't question a man who has an entire outfit made of "Starry Night."
Stop faking being verified
How can two people both be so confident that they’re right when having reached two different conclusions is one of the best questions I’ve ever heard
I’ll tell you how...
People don’t think before commenting in the internet
(Just to be clear I’m not referring to anyone in particular)
The way i see it, truth is only capital t True when all details and relationships are fully and perfectly explained: anything less than the entire universe, 1:1, is only a part of the truth. Being limited creatures, we can only ever understand small parts of the world, and even then mostly in abstract terms. The incomplete pictures we paint individually, even if we were all perfect reasoners, could still seem to conflict with one another just because of missing information.
It's the danger between confirmation bias vs. the scientific method. In the scientific method, people try to prove a hypothesis wrong with clear, conclusive tests and do their best to admit the flaws of their tests. Confirmation bias has a person hearing the same opinion over and over by various sources to the point that it feels true. And honestly, its very easy to muddle the logic because we're flawed emotional monkey people. Lol
How often do two people lack confidence when they happen to arrive at the same conclusion?
@@landlighterfirestar5550so true
I love what Neil deGrasse Tyson said about words and ideas. "Ideas matter... more than the words we come up with to describe them." :)
Kevin: pulls out cat
Me: goes "awwwwwww" and immediately forgets what the video was about
I pretty much had the same reaction, I said to myself this isn't a cat, but had a feeling their was going to be a cat. Seconds later I shouted "CAT". And forgot about the video
But are we really certain that it is as a cat? Is what we see really what we see? We see a cat, but was it really a cat?
Hence the topic of this video... We see a cat, we believe it's a cat, we believe we know what a cat is, so what he had being a cat must be true, right?
"Social media is a venomous snake out of linguistic diarrhea and keyboard garbage"
Sounds like Twitter is getting to him.
He's right tho
Isn't he participating in creating it?
Fun fact: You can literally just delete your Twitter, like no one is stopping you, you might not know though because Twitter is a hellhole and easy to fall into an addiction with oops
at the very least, the mob of kpop stans
@@QueenFondue I don't like paying taxes or having to wear pants, but I keep going to work all the same. Social media's a dumpster fire, but it has it light sides to make it worth it. Especially right now. Well, sometimes. In moderation. Used the right ways. If you're lucky.
A question that's been lurking in my mind since i was a child is...
Does Lightning McQueen has life insurance or a car insurance?
Schizkreig's Cup I’m going to throw the flipping table
Life insurance. Lightning doesn't have a car. He is a car, but he doesn't own one.
Do you have human insurance?
Do cars buy humans at human dealer ships?
Wait... hol-
Isnt that the same in cars?
I knew a cat was in this video because of my past experiences with Kevin's videos. When he pulled out the toy cat and said there was a cat in this video, I knew he would soon reveal a real cat
meow
Cats are Cool...
Thats not knowledge. Thats predicting because of probabilities
2:31 Schrödinger’s Coin
This is an underrated comment
It’s both heads and tails at the same time, so we’re all right!
I love superposition
I really want to know what it was now 😭
I bet if you analyzed each frame carefully, you could figure out what it actually landed on.
After looking at it frame by frame, I think it ended on tails, but I am not positive.
@@deamichaelis1 But do you know?!
"I haven't been outside for four months"
I know that feel V.
Same 😔
So... just... go out.
Go out for a walk or something, just don't get close to people
V has Come to
It’s fun
UA-cam: Don't use nsfw words, you'll be demonitized.
Kevin: L I n g u I s t I c D I a r r h e a
That is why we love him
UA-cam: Linguistic!?
HOW DARE!? Demonetized!
The subtitles say "verbal" instead of linguistic and I will not rest until it's fixed.
Lukas Macdonald it can be spelled both ways
Red Forest You also said the L-word
Feynman once said that science can never show anything to be right, it can only show it to be wrong.
And that's all it takes!
Wonderful quote.
That cat's long-suffering "my owner is a philosopher" face just said it all.
“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.”
― Neil deGrasse Tyson
hi you just made three comments and I see all of them and ooh you watch vsauce too?
@@allegrovivace6806 been watching for years.
@@QuestionEverythingButWHY nice I think I also saw you on a mozart vid lol
You realize that scientists also has beliefs to you know
@@allegrovivace6806 yeah just want to be omnipresent lol.
We need more people like Kevin who regularly uploads good content
Regularly?
@@Chipwhitley274 once a month is regularly
That would be great, but I personally already found enough quality content to fill all of my free time
One thing he forgot to ask Neil: "Is catsup sauce?"
And then at the end, he could spell the "sauce" in Vsauce with catsup.
Socrates was a genius
I came here, two months too late, to post something similar but you, sir, have covered me! Kudos!
Hotdog bun peanut butter and jelly does that count as a hot dog or...
no he was a philosopher
Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Morons.
Wrong!
Kevin: *Right? WR- Sometimes...*
Me, a veteran subscriber: *uh wait, that doesn’t compute*
Get a quantum computer
This video is the embodiment of the “well, yes but actually no” meme
Well yes but actually no
well yes but actually know
So, milliseconds before Neil appeared, an ad played for Neil's masterclass, that had to be on purpose right?
Seeing as I got the exact same ad, I think we've got it confirmed.
i got neil's masterclass ad too
Me seven
I didn't get the ad :(
me π²
Tyson has implicitly defined knowledge as not needing to be perfectly reliable, basically saying we can know things “well enough” to be going about our day as if it’s perfectly reliable. In reality even in cases where we can count things, there’s no way we can 100% rule out the possibility that we’ve consistently miscounted or that the simulation we live in presents to our sense a different number of things than what actually exists.
thats true, but i think really what hes arguing is that it doesnt matter. if i spend my life learning to make chocolate and i build an entire chocolate empire, sure i could be making chocolate completely wrong. everyone watching my simulation could be laughing at what i think chocolate is. or perhaps there could be a better way to make chocolate that no one inows about it. i can never confirm that i may be completely wrong, but does it honestly matter if despite all that, i have a chocolate empire and everyone loves my product?
6:11 The cat is like "Not this again, I thought the sheriff cat would've distracted him"
Definition of a sandwich:
"A non bread food sitting between two surfaces of bread" :B
So you cant have a Bread-Sandwich? :(
Air sandwich?
SF / Bup Toad A knuckle sandwich?
Great, my air sandwich is still a sandwich.
a sandwich inside of a sandwich
Except for Neil, he knows everything.
It’s really you, the real Chris Kogos
Hello there
Yo we're subbed to pretty much all the same people
suckup
Lying doesnt have limits, he is fraud.
I was dissatisfied with Neil's initial response as it deflected the actual question and I'd thought that he'd missed the point altogether. Turns out he opted for a pragmatic response to a question rooted in philosophy. Glad he clarified
The like 3 frame flash of Neil before the ad is hilarious
"I haven't been outside in four months"
GO FIGURE OUT WHAT KNOWLEDGE IS
I'm loving the idea that he really hasn't been outside in 4 months, meaning he already had sheriff cat, and it wasnt aquired just for the bit.
He could’ve ordered it but your probably right
Do you really think he went out and said "yeah, I'm gonna buy a sheriff cat today."
He probably did have it, and wrote the script around it, or maybe he did buy it within the last 4 months, but it would be no different to if he bought it 8 months ago in that he probably just saw it in a shop and thought it looked interesting enough to buy.
"Is it a non-bread food, sitting between two surfaces of bread?". False, Mr Tyson. The bread is uniform, therefore we must conclude that a hot dog is a taco.
"There is no truth, only what you choose to believe"
-Hudson, Call Of Duty: Cold War
This video taught me three things:
1. Hot dogs are sandwiches.
2. Hot dogs are phones.
3. Therefore, sandwiches are phones.
4. Therefore, phones are sandwiches. Therefore you can eat phones.
Even if all hotdogs are sandwiches and all hot dogs are phones, you could have sandwiches that are neither hot dogs or phones, and phones that are neither sandwiches or hotdogs.
I play Pokémon go on a glizzy
Try calling Your grandma with it and tell me how it goes 🤔😄
@@DennisComella this is not even right:
chinease are human beings,
chinease are asiatic,
But human beings are not ALL asiatic 😕
However,
the Earth is a pie,
Pies are flat,
So the Earth is flat !
Wait, he didn’t say wrong? There must be a glitch in the matrix
Have i seen you from drew durnil?
Hi! How is North Korea doing?
Kimmy, Neil said the wrong in this video
4:21 12 year olds during puberty
when they see a lil mustache
I think it's actually closer to 14.
Neil has an amazing way of saying true things in very unlikable ways
Thank you! I never want to agree with the guy, but he rarely says something I disagree with.
"Social Media is a venomous snake pit of linguistic diarrhea and keyboard garbage..."
-Vsause2; 2020
^^^ words to live by ^^^
“I vowed many years ago to never get in an argument over the definition of a word.”
I guess we learned something over the “Is Pluto a planet?” Question...
That Pluto thing is not about definition of a word, it's about definition of a planet. Mickey Mouse's dog is still a dog, not a dwarf planet.
@@metalzonemt-2 so.... Its about the defination of the word 'planet' ?
@@1MrRandom030 It's about the fact that if you call Pluto a planet, then all dwarf planets are planets, and the planets in the solar system will number in the dozens. Let's just say that it'd not be practical
@@pokoirlyase5931 I can define planet as everything that is considered planet by astronomy and Pluto
you can just say 'The 8 planets + pluto'
"If youre walking in the woods"... theres no one around and your phone is dead...
ˢʰᶦᵃ ᴸᵃᵇᵉᵒᵘᶠ
Out of the corner of your eye you spot him
Honestly, I’ve just been believing someone has kept track of time since it’s existence. I truly do not know if it’s Tuesday.
Neil deGrasse Tyson: i don't like to categorize
Also Neil deGrasse Tyson: Pluto is a dwarf planet
A hot dog is a sandwich
@Queen Diomedes of Thrace that's not a fact. It's a new sub-category made up by someone. Nothing changed about our understanding of Pluto, it was just categorized differently
Fight fight fight
@@amalgamation21 🍿🍿🍿🍿
Our definition of a planet updated, so too our categorization of Pluto. It doesnt hold other celestial bodies in an orbit of its own due to gravity, therefore it's Much less than the 8 actual planets.
“Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt.”
― Richard P. Feynman
hi you just made three comments and I see all of them and ooh you watch vsauce too?
doubt you even know what the quote means.
@@allegrovivace6806 wrong
@@jesperdonner1609 right
And yet they can coexist and complement each other
Love your videos Kevin! keep it up only found you recently. Gonna start making more of my own videos because of these. Hopefully can use you as some inspiration.
I was expecting Mr.Tyson to ask "is it a cube?" simply for the humor of it.
"just invent a new category" is always the easiest way to end an argument if you were to ask me.
„Only a few people know, how much you have to know, to know, how less you know”
~Werner Heisenberg
Me watching the video and see's a master class ad with neil deGrasse tyson: hmm that was expected
me too xd
Same here.
Neil deGrasse is one of the smartest people ive ever seen, it feels like he knows everything but he is just like any of us, he just knows that he doesnt know everything, but he tries to find the answer by hypothesising and trying to make people discuss it with him.
I wish i could just talk to this man, i wouldnt have important things to say, i dont even have questions i wanna ask him, i just want to listen to everything he has to say.
Also thanks for this great video and a fairly understandable explanation of this concept of knowledge, and a perfect guest on this show to help you convey this concept to us.
You should look for more people
Arvid Kracht haha Quantum Physics go brrt
He definitely knows how to lie to sheeple like you, he is a lying puppet defending heliocentric model for living even though he knows the earth is flat, research it in real life sheep, dont be a sheep.
@@idontcare7961 You clearly are interested in science and scientific methods. You wouldn't be watching this if you weren't and I applaud you for that. Try to disprove your hypothesis with more than one experiment. Get a friend from another country (or even state, if you're in the US) to put a stick in the ground at the same time as you and calculate the shadow length difference.
Get a telescope (or go to an observatory) and look at the other planets. If they are flat, then it's a safe assumption that Earth is flat as well. If they are round, how come they are all facing towards me? Wouldn't someone in another part of the world see an elongated disk? Also, if it's a projection on a dome, then shouldn't more powerful telescopes be just as useless as less powerful ones?
Observe a lunar eclipse. If the moon is obscured by Earth's shadow created by the Sun, then it must mean the Sun is on the other side of the disk. Then how come it's day on some other part of the world if it's on the same side of the disk as you? Otherwise, shouldn't the shadow on the moon look differently?
Also, walking straight from a fixed point in the same direction on a globe Earth and on a flat one should yield different results.
I'm actually impressed by you for trying to prove your belief in the video you posted, but just like the broken clock in the video, you might not know the truth until you do a second or a third observation. I really admire you for looking at both sides of the story and not limiting yourself to one bubble of knowledge. Keep up the experimenting, homie.
@@zepp3299 Wow, you actually explained your point really well, all while being respectful and polite. Don't see that often on the internet, thank you.
"Hello"
Ad in hindi: "hello namaste"
After Ad: Tyson on call
I was thinking about how long it had been since the last Vsauce2 video literally 10 minutes before the upload :D
Coincidence. I think not.😁😁
@@gigachad5598 right? wr-nvm
Hive mind as I did the same and was watching the comments for it!
Me too
Idk if you know Mathologer, but everytime Yt says "hey, here are some Mathologer videos" and after it i Binge-watch some of his old Videos i didn't have seen yet or didn't understood it, on this exact day, he uploads a new one.
Sry if this isn't correct English, I'm from Germany
"I have vowed many years ago to never get into an argument with someone on the definition of a word"
- Neil
"Surely it should be roses are red, violets are violet"
- Neil
exactly!!! violets are not blue
Roses are rose..
Absolutely brilliant! I love it! You people do awesome work, thank you. I myself am still struggling to comprehend Michael's video of the consciousness and wonder if anything is actually knowledge of the conscious of the human or if our subconscious is actually all knowing, as in, is our conscious mind simply an infant to our subconscious parent, allowing us to "see" what it allows? At the end of the day I believe humans are simply children of the universe with soooo much to learn and I look forward to it for our human race. Thanks again to your team, your healing expedite the process
Vsauce: theres a cat in this UA-cam video
me: do you count the toy
Vsauce: NOOOO
What was Luna the cat DOING to him under that table. Thats what I want a scientific discussion about.
In "Truth" I bet the Tyson tool would have the answer to it! . . . . 🤏🧠
The most crazy and amazing coincidence just happened. The moment the video stopped when he takes the call, right before the instant Neil appears... He appeared, but as a UA-cam ad from his Master Class.
And then I realized the video just gave me an example of exactly what it was talking about. I was pretty sure I was about to see Neil, I knew it and believed in it and it was true, I knew it from the video title. But then he appears at the exact right moment in a way I did not expect. (the ad)
It felt so confusing and amazing and meta, all at once.
That's it, it was so cool I had to comment. Now let me finish the video :D
Nice
Nice essay it's not due until next week
"I haven't been out in four months"
I haven't been out since February which is idk how many months ಥ‿ಥ
Thank you! I e been trying to tell people this for a few years now, but of course they didn’t listen.
So I’ve been off social media for 4 years now.
I found peace, I found my Zen.
I don't know but I was wondering how neil every time he explains something gets the perfect words to explain it.
I mean I didn't get any perfect words to explain to my parents why am I watching this video at 12:16am
"You look at a clock to tell the time because clocks tell time."
"An interpretation is the way a musician interprets a piece."
this is why youtube is awesome
5:51 "You're on youtube right now"
Me who downloaded the video: "i'm four parallel universes ahead of you"
"four parallel universe ahead" this physically hurts my head.
This guy can read a text of gibberish and it still would sound epic and deep.
"There is a cat in this UA-cam video."
*pulls out miniature cow-boy cat*
Me : ok, real cat under the table.
But I was only able to actually KNOW this because that was the point of the video. In normal circonstances...
Neil: "Earth goes around the sun, that's not gonna later on be shown to be false, ever, ever."
Flat earther: "Am I a joke to you?"
Everyone with a brain: "Yes, yes you are"
I think it's possible to be a flat earther without thinking the earth is also the center of the universe. I mean, it's all dumb, but I could see that being a thing.
Also,
5 Trillion AD: The sun has exploded, we are moving Earth to another star.
@@johnlucas463 But Earth going around Sun at this moment will be true even after neither exists.
@@CaptIronfoundersson you'd still be a joke, but ok
John Lucas The Sun’s not going to explode since it doesn’t have enough mass. It will slowly poison itself with heavier elements, swell up to red giant, cast off the outer shell, which will leave behind a white dwarf. So, what can do here that doesn’t included us moving the Earth to another star?
1- move the Earth out until the Sun passes the red giant stage. Then move the Earth back in close to the white dwarf that our Sun has become.
2 - Or just lift the excess matter and impurities from our Sun so that it never poisons itself and makes can make more efficient use of its hydrogen fuel. Use the heavier materials for whatever we want. Move the Earth in as the Sun becomes smaller. Slowly add back in, the the excess hydrogen that we lifted from the Sun. Then worry about what to do in 5 trillion year, when our red dwarf Sun begins to turn blue.
Listen, the hot dog is not a hot dog, so by definition is not a sandwich, the whole system that made the hot dog is basically "this is not this" so why a hot dog will be a sandwich if a hot dog is not a horny dog?
Si
logics
Logics
S í
This gives me a great idea for an app
I like how every one of these videos I watch I don't understand most of it then by the end still feel as if I have.
Great vid mate subbed love these vids that get you thinking keep it up mate 👍
🤣😂😂 The moment Kevin picked up the phone and said “hello”, an ad for Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s master class popped up at the exact moment after that second. That was literally perfect timing!
The same thing happened to me.
Alan Grimm 😂 No Way!
I got a geico ad😔
Same it popes up at the start tho
Got it right after "hello?" as well. Weird!!!
Oh my gosh guys it's Kneel the Grass Tie-Son
Bruh
Watching a grown man play with a cat action figure for 30s was the best part of this video.
I need the song that's at the end of this video - imagine waking up every morning and starting your day to that 😂👌🏽
The most important question human beings have asked, is "Why?".
Never, *ever* stop asking, "Why?"
But why?
But if I ask why, I’ll go to hell. 🤪
Why is Gamora?
Philosophers ask why, scientists ask how.
0:11 _"No one can agree on what knowledge actually is knowledge."_
That is quite a disingenuous way of putting it. That claim implies that most arguments on the internet are educated, sensible arguments on epistemology, when that is far from the truth. In actuality, arguments on the internet are usually between people trying their best to understand something and reason about it on one side, and mass campaigns of disinformation and censorship, and their victims, on the other side.
It's also very hard to apply "justified true belief" to most internet arguments, since most internet arguments are on political topics of one kind or another. And concrete, solid, full information is something unheard of in the world of politics. Truth is we're all operating on very, very limited data, offering us a tiny glimpse at reality, muddied and distorted by the bias of the sources we're using. The only way of actually making sense of it is by looking at it from multiple points of view. Luckily, there are plenty of people on the internet, with lots of points of view. Unfortunately, most of them are not opened to reason. It is by design that things are so, because the internet would allow the vast majority of humanity to reach some form consensus were this not the case.
If there's one thing you take away from this let it be this: Seek not those that agree with you, but seek instead those that disagree with you. Don't be afraid of being wrong. Don't be afraid of talking with those that disagree with you. Don't worry about the people that disagree with you and want to talk with you, be worried about those that agree with you and never want to discuss it.
Well put
Thanks Carl Popper.
PS. Internet arguments, esp. on very social, popular platforms like UA-cam, FB, Twitter or Reddit are *****, so don't bother.
Now try to deconstruct your own argument and try to find where it may be wrong.
@@Hartbreak1 I have yet to find a hole in the argument "communication between people leads to better understanding", but I welcome you to try.
@@CristiNeagu
What you describe works when both parties are interested in actually bettering their understanding, but as you say there are many bad actors looking to spread misinformation. Many flat earthers will use the "You should listen to those who disagree" point to defend their baseless viewpoints by pointing at an endless stream of "evidence" that simply takes too long to refute. People who aren't very skilled at critical thought may be more susceptible to misinformation following that advice. I agree that generally we should strive for better communication, but that relies on some base level of critical thinking and cooperation that I just don't think the majority of people will take part in. It's far more exhausting to constantly think and question and refine what you think than it is to unquestionably accept something.
I had this conversation before. Knowledge requires validation and, even then, it's not guaranteed to be correct. We've validated things and claimed to know them before, only to later find that we didn't know what we thought we did.
Sooo much fun! Wonderful stuff!! I feel better about why people think the way they do that usually bothers me so much! I now wish everyone would absorb this video!
"The ancient oracle said I was the wisest of all the Greeks. It is because I alone know that I know nothing" -Socrates
And then he said the wisest person is the person who knows it knows nothing.
@@Getyourwishh that's why wisdom is not knowledge, it's more of an intuition; an ability to think aptly.
Socrates was kind of a douche though
UA-cam just made me laugh! Just as the phone rang and Kevin said “Hello”, UA-cam played a commercial for Hello Fresh. The timing was so perfect that it looked planned 😂
That "ft. Neil de Grasse Tyson" at the "you're watching a yt video" bit reveled itself a surprise to be sure, but a welcome one
11:13 -- I suspect that they're actually talking on cell phones, and using the old-fashioned phones as Gettier props.
Read this right at 11:13. How come I am reading all of these comments right as the video gets to that moment
@@shilohplus4898 I did the exact same thing and I'm fucjing scared
I read it then too! W.t.f?
A lot of people read comments. A few of people are watching the video at that stamp time. So some people (3 in this case) happened to do that at the same time. Probability is a thing.
I asked my food tech teacher, and she said it's not a sandwich because the two pieces of bread are connected. It's actually a taco.
That happens when every dummy thinks they are some sort of expert and eagerly shares their opinion.
"Earth goes around sun, that can't be proven wrong."
Idiots believing in flat earth : Allow us to introduce ourselves
I absolutely love that opening statement
I thought that when I finished the IB I'd never have to deal with Theory of Knowledge again... This is bringing back so many memories.
Good video though!
"Free speech is my right to say what you don't want to hear."
--George Orwell.
This is good knowledge.
I can't stress how much I agree on Neil's take on discussing definitions, I'm so tired of tags, labels, etc. So dumb to argue about that
Windrune it’s fun
Really interesting and really entertaining!
Pls more of that philosophical stuff!
I don't know if anyone else noticed, but when the video pans out when he's talking about us knowing we're on youtube, you can see in the title of the video at 5:52, it says ft. Neil Degrasse Tyson, so it spoils the surprise before we know it to be true
"I'm never going to look at the outcome of this coin flip"
Sounds like we're all wrong in thinking heads OR tails; that's a quantum coin right there.
Schrödinger's Coin.
*OCD intensifies*
If it’s a quantum coin then you’re all right? Unless I don’t understand quantum mechanics at all, which to be fair is completely true
@@aarobec we're all right and wrong at the same time
I guess my question is: "What is the difference between squashed circle and an elongated one?".
Maybe if you think about orbital circles a squashed circle would have the bigger mass (say the sun) in the middle of the circle and in the case of an elongated circle, one side would be closer to the sun and the other one farther away. Then the far end would be narrow and the other wide so it's not really "squashed"
Definitions... 😂-gonna avoid that argument
So:
Squashed circle is wider than higher, because it was squashed from up/downside and than it expanded sideways
Elongated circle is wider than higher, because it was pulled on sides, what made it to shrink on the top/bottom
:D
In other words: it doesn't matter, what is the shape, but description can change basing on the process that made the circle differ from regular circle.
//Sorry 4 my English lol
Wouldn't squashing or elongating a circle make it both squashed and elongated at the same time? Changing perspectives makes it look like both.
Maybe when you are elongating the circle, the height of the circle doesn't change, and so it is only the width changing.
“ Idea matter to me ， more than the words we come up with， to describe them！” that is sharp！
What a lovely guest
Tyson is always a pleasure
to listen.
Good for YOU
and us LOL
2:30 But Schrödinger's cat...
Indeed
Maybe it landed on the coins side where it is not heads nor tails and he edited it out to make us think some of us are right when we are all WRONG
The coin was both heads and tails
“Linguistic Dhiarriah” is an actual thing that someone said.
That's not how you say diarrhoea
Do you mean dyerryeaugh?
the word you are looking for is dryerheya....
it's dry area
It’s dijiorno
I agree about not arguing about the definition of a word. If someone sees a word differently than I do and I notice I just ask the to define what they mean the long way and I'll do the same. Then accept whatever definition they give you for that particular conversation,. That way you don't let words stop you from communicating the idea and understanding the other person's idea. It's crazy how many times I've seen people argue the same side of an issue using different words for the same ideas.
6:29 - Oh, VSauce, Cats already KNOW what knowledge is, but they aren't going to reveal it to lesser creatures such as the human race.
Thank you for linking the literature in the description, I'll have a ready. I can tell there was so much effort put into this video and it doesn't go unnoticed so thank you so much for that. Also I'm not usually a fan of cat but that little furry thing looks gorgeous.
A summary of this video:
Astronaut 1: Wait it's all an illusion!
Astronaut 2: **points gun** Always has been.
Most of the things discussed in the video can be already found in various Plato's dialogues. With some Kant and Popper you can complete the entire video. Scientists believe to discuss new and innovative things but philosophers are familiar with these topics for centuries and millenia.
"This wasn't even plugged in" ... Ha ha ha you made me laugh 😄