Yeah actually, why ‘do’ people lock overpowered evil entities behind areas that you would otherwise expect to have access at some point? Doors, caves, or whatever else
Good luck making a solid and strong enough wall while the monster is inside. With doors, they can create them earlier and just lock 'em when the monster crosses.
maybe because building a wall around the creature would take too long? i feel like the "doors" and "caves" function more like snares, cages or jailcells, where they have to exist prior to the lockup, and have to have an entrance so that the creature can be locked up quicker? but idk that's just one way to look at it
"Why do people always lock things behind doors instead of walls?" Actually, I read a book that had an answer to this. I don't know if it applies in this situation, since they're two COMPLETELY different universes, but since they're both magical doors trapping giant magical creatures in a different dimension, I would assume it's close enough. I don't remember it very well, but the basic idea was that "when sealing something with magic, there _has_ to be a way to undo it. If there isn't, the magic starts to unravel itself, weakening until it no longer works properly. If there's a way to undo it, no matter how difficult, the magic stays functional for an almost infinite amount of time." Plus, it's just common sense. If there's a door, then people will focus on trying to get through that door, and won't realise that they could just destroy it much easier. Another reason could possibly be that they needed a way to get the thing in there. If they conjured a wall in front of it, or built a wall, it might take a lot longer than simply closing a door. Yes I know that was a joke, I laughed at it and realised it was a joke immediately. I just find this subject fascinating, and I'll take any excuse to dig through a book.
Building a box to lure something in and lock it in definitely much easier to build the box around the something from scratch. You want to build a garage and lure a mad car driver into it, not have them park the car and build the garage around it.
The book might be the Fablehaven series, one of the main characters asked why the giant demon prison had a way of releasing the demons inside and another character said something like what you put in your comment
The most impressive part about this movie is that they taught those Dragons to act. I mean if those Dragons could act, imagine what someone like I could do
A door is how you efficiently get out after putting the monster on the other side. You should absolutely build a wall on the outside of the door, but it would take to long to build the wall while there is an open space for it to escape through
This is a real stretch. I think they just made the Dweller in Darkness a generic monster because they had no plans to use him as anything more. They actually use it the same way in the Guardians of the Galaxy game.
most of the stuff about the xmen in the mcu felt like a stretch, but the stuff about the potential villians/wanda being called to actually sounded realistic! If I had to guess he’s probably PARTIALLY correct lol
Plus the question still remains where are the X men in present day MUC? Sure X men 97 might have given rise to Galan, Galactus and present day MUC and Galactus might be the upcoming big baddie but where does X men fit now?
I just want Deadpool to randomly walk by the scaffolding fight scene and nonchalantly say “Not my cat, not my fight” and he just continues to walk past the huge fight, ignoring it completely. Lol
There’s actually a reference to the Fantastic 4 in Spider-Man 2. When Peter and MJ swing to the ground before the Mysterio announcement framing Peter, you can see wall barriers on the street behind them, saying: “we can’t wait to show you what’s next! 1… 2… 3… ?”
I'm surprised that the possibility that the "Dweller in Darkness" we saw in Shang-chi was not actually the "Dweller in Darkness" wasn't brought up. I mean, it's totally possible that the big dragon thing was just a general, a "mid-level boss", as it were. It just seemed weird that before the door opened, it acted as a skillful manipulator, but as soon as the seal broke it was just "Rawr big monster"...
@@seelfire4725 "Greetings, I'm the Dweller in Darkness, pleased to meet you all. If you would be so kind as to let me past, I would not be forced to steal all your souls. By the way, did you all realize that I could have literally flown in any other direction than this town? Not installing a giant net or barrier around the door was a very poor decision..."
@@insertclevernamehere1186 The village is at the portal to earth. If the dweller decides hes cool not destroying our reality, there's really nothing to be gained by forcing a confrontation. Nothing wrong with that.
That is consistent with marvel/Disney's MO. Introducing a big bad and then leaving it to simmer off screen while subtly implying that it might be dead or just another power below an even bigger threat.
It’s funny how most of MatPat’s theories almost always are ways to predict what’s NOT going to happen, but still somewhat in a weird way makes sense (unless it’s a theory like Ness = Sans).
A theory that calculates how often matpat theories are correct, the accuracy over the lifetime of his channels and it needs to be hosted by Austin. THE SCIENCE 🔬
The part where Matpat said that the Dweller of Darkness probably talked to Wanda as her kids freaking BLEW MY MIND!!! I feel like that could 100% have happened
I think he was telling about future of mcu, not just about the spiderman movie. Like in after credit scenes, they can reveal about xmen or venom, and these villains from other universes
True, probably because of click bait. NWH is coming out this month though so maybe he's hoping something will happen in it to help tie into the theory?
Matpats strat for the perfect theory for how they bring over the FOX characters is to just do like, 50 theories about it and one will end up being right
I'm not sure how much comic reading you've done MatPat but it's worth mentioning that the 10 rings used by the Mandarin come from the civilization of Fing Fang Foom. Also if Galactus were to invade our heroes in the MCU would also have to clash with his heralds, which is one reason it would also be hard for Galactus to be manipulated.
I'm calling it right now (only half-joking), the other two Spiders in No Way Home will be Spider-Ham and Spider Noir. There! Now I'll get bragging rights if, by some stroke of luck or absurdity, I'm proven right!
*MatPat:* WHY NOT MAKE WALLS? Walls aren't meant to be opened! *Movie logic:* No, silly they're meant to be broken! The result would've been the same either way.
To be fair you can’t just put a giant monster in a room and expect it to just sit still while you build a wall, so you build the door ahead of time and put him in and shut the door
I blame Phone Dude. If it weren’t for him Springtrap would’ve been left to rot rather than becoming a glitch rabbit that’s also a 50ft trash rabbit (for some reason)
I theorized that Xu Wenwu, masked the intended use of the rings using a spell that gave the rings their blue hue when in his possession. When Shang-Chi started using the rings, the spell wasn't able to hold in his possession and gave off a yellow hue. It's original color. That's why the beacon wasn't reactivated until Shang-Chi started using the rings and they went back to being yellow.
Or maybe due to shang-chi's ancestral lineage in Ta Lo that gives him the connection to the Rings that Wenwu never have. Proly the City of Ta Lo has some connection to the Eternals or something
Stephanie and MatPat watching a movie: Steph: Matthew, please don’t start making any Theory’s while we’re watching this. I just wanna enjoy this film. MatPat: Wait, what if….. Steph: Oh No
Question: Why would the rings call out to Galactus? are they like actual dinner bells that were just flung into space by Galactus hoping they would land on a planet with sentient creatures that could use them? And why did it take Shang-Chi to use them for the beacon to activate? Was his dad not the right flavour of human for the beacon to turn on?
I think it's because Shang-Chi is the lineage, remember he is the son of Ying Li, a decendant of Ta Lo, so think that might be the reason, or atleast partial reason why the ring worked with Shang-Shi but not Xu Wenwu his dad, its because like I said Shang-Shi the decendant of Ta Lo, while his father is 100% human.
i think it activated when shang chi warrior because something about him whether it’s his age or strength or maybe even it’s memories read or something, told the rings that the earth was primed for being eaten. maybe beating the dweller told it that as now earth made creatures strong enough to do stuff like that
Galactus is one of those big baddies that has crossed paths with almost every Marvel property that exists, so he can easily fit where ever needed in a story and is impressive enough of a character to play a part - if not be - the cornerstone baddie. Another interesting fact is that CMON (company known for board games that also has a license for Marvel games) has a giant Galactus figure in their next game.
Okay, about the Rings and why Wong never noticed them... They explain in the movie that the Mandarin's rings were made of a different energy compared to Shang Chi's. That is why Shang Chi's rings are a different color and seem to be more powerful than the Mandarin's.
Yeah its the same rings. But he mentions that they seem to be from a different universe. I think they were in a sense activated when Shang Chi killed the dweller, that's what Wong and the others felt
Okay, I hear you, but hear me out... This is a cool theory but we know Kevin Feige likes to keep it simple, so I think we'll get Galactus with a little simplified storyline. Like how Tony Stark built Ultron instead of Hank Pym, or how the origins of a lot of characters' powers are changed to be explained with an interaction with the infinity stones now. I think he'll just be a celestial that doesn't like other celestials' ways. Or maybe he "merged" with a celestial right before the celestial was born and destroyed his planet, so now he devours planets to stop celestials from being born etc. (just like how he merged with the sentience of the universe) I'm just spitballing here, but I think if they made Ego a celestial, making Galactus a celestial as well to simplify his backstory for the general audience makes sense. But I thought of Galactus as well when they said the rings started a beacon. (I watched the movie after I watched Eternals so I knew they didn't belong to them.) I think they might belong to one of Galactus' old heralds, like Air-Walker. He's a good candidate because he's from Xandar which is already established in the MCU, his powers are vague enough that they could be bent to the powers of the rings, he doesn't already have an iconic object like Silver Surfer's board or Firelord's staff, and I don't think he's a popular enough character to make people mad just because he's killed off in the past. (That one Air-Walker fan reading this, I'm sorry, but come on.) Plus, the explanation for his powers are quite similar to how Eternals' powers are explained in the movie (that's true for most heralds I believe), which would tie in nicely with making Galactus a Celestial (just a copy-paste from marvel fandom .com because I'm lazy); _"The original Air-Walker possessed the vast cosmic power that Galactus granted to all of his heralds upon their initiation. His body was restructured to be a living battery of cosmic energy, the Air-Walker could utilize cosmic power for a variety of effects: heat, concussive force, magnetism, electricity, etc. Unlike most of the other heralds, the Air-Walker utilized this cosmic energy without an accompanying visible manifestation (such as Firelord's "cosmic flame")."_ Also, I believe Air-Walker was featured in a Marvel game recently, Marvel Contest of Champions. They sometimes introduce comic book versions of some characters to mobile games like Contest of Champions and Marvel Future Fight before they're introduced in the movies. So maybe there's something to that as well.
This just popped into my mind... Now that's kind of a separate theory, but, if they apply how Air-Walker was created to Eternals, I think that would solve some issues I had with them. Like, if Eternals are robots, how can Thanos and Starfox be brothers? Or, why was Sprite created as a child in the first place? Why were they given emotions and personalities? If they were " *restructured* to be a living battery of cosmic energy" instead of being *created* as robots, I think that would answer a lot of those questions. Maybe Celestials came to Titan and created a bunch of robots for themselves? And that could explain why Titan was weird like that and how it was destroyed, why Thanos didn't just double the resources, and he destroyed half of the population instead, etc.
Just a reminder that in the story where the planets produce superpowered entities as "antibodies" to protect the celestial eggs in their cores, Galactus consumes these planets not just because he's hungry but as a counterbalance to the propagation of the celestials and their potential "overpopulation".
2:52 For argument's sake I'm just gonna say that's because doors are also easier to close than walls, because they can actually be closed. Logically it does seem to be easier to trap something in a room by just quickly pushing a door closed, rather than asking it to politely stand still while you build a whole wall. Obviously, there's still some flaws with that in certain contexts of thing being sealed e.g when the door is actually built around them rather than just shut on them. And even in the contexts where it makes sense it still usually leaves the question of "Ok, but now the door's closed you could've still built a wall or even walls in front of it right?" But at least there are some somewhat decent arguments to be made.
Thats assuming the door was already there to begin with. If they have to build it, it takes more time to build a door than a wall. But usually in stories to explain why, they tend to give an answer of "they were buying time to learn how to truly defeat it " of making the item or person still accessible
My bet is they intended to build a wall after they close the door, but then think “You know what, that’s probably good enough.” and just left it like a rough draft of an essay.
impossible put real actors in those original consumes, average movie goer is just walking back out the door. There is NOTHING good about how the originals looked back tyen.
It's so cool that Film Theory has enough episodes for a real Marvel style flipbook opening. Also, that wasn't really a door, it didn't have hinges or a handle, it technically WAS a wall, made out of dragon scales. And I would love to see what could come out if Disney ever purchased the rights to the Warcraft franchise.
You should do a Gravity Rush/ Gravity Rush 2 theory on whether or bot the city on the world pillar would be able to support itself with the amount of space given, and whether the city would stay upright
How many did you see? 14,000,605. How many was MatPat right? All of them... But one... This one. He's wrong in this future, but all the other ones. He's dead on right.
Hey MatPat and theorists, I’d like to point out that you said the upcoming X-Men ‘97 was the only Fox Marvel property to be announced, but an MCU Fantastic 4 was actually announced a while ago. Great theory, and keep up the great work!
Trevor had some of the funniest scenes in the movie. "If they could teach the monkeys to act that brilliantly, just imagine what I could bring to the world"
the rings were strong enough to break the prison and the dweller in darkness had not eaten in thousands of years aside from the few souls gained during the battle, which increased its strength noticeably each time. presumably in the original final battle it was well fed and thus MUCH stronger
They already teased Galactus in one of the 'What if' episodes. When the Watcher is being slammed through dimensions by Ultimatron, you can see a glimpse of him taking a bite of the planet they're on.
i personally think that the beacon at the end is calling fin fang foom, considering fin fang foom is an alien dragon. Also, in the comics, the 10 rings are just a power source for fin fang foom's species that they accidentally left behind. i think that in the next shang chi movie, fin fang foom is going to try to recover the 10 rings for his homeworld: Kakaranthara edit: i added some detail
13:40 my guess as far as why they noticed Shang-Chi's use and not WenWu's might be due to the power level usage. Wenwu's power usage of the rings was probably at a basic or average level of magic usage that might not get all that much notice with all the regular magic that gets used on Earth. You'd have to be REALLY looking for that unique magic signature and scrolling through subsections of magic to notice and find it. But Shang-Chi in that movie probably pushed the power intensity when he fought The Dweller in Darkness, that surpassed the base-line magic levels Khamar Taj would notice. And that got Wong to look into the specifics of what was going on and to seek out Shang-Chi himself.
I think something you over looked, is that producers at marvel had seid they don't want to do live action Xmen because it will extend the MCU's life by 10 years
I want the 90's animated X-Men to port directly over from their animated universe into the MCU. Not as cartoons but realistic versions of those same characters complete w/ their respective colorful costumes & personalities. The MCU likes to do things not seen b4. & we have yet to see those iconic & beloved costumes on the big screen.
Xu Wenwu didn’t activate the beacon on the 10 rings because he “wasn’t worthy” and that’s why he also never unlocked their full potential. That’s why Shang Chi was able to use them so easily and so strong from the beginning.
“Why do people seal things behind doors” well matpat, fable haven has a very good explanation. Magical prisons built to last forever don’t hold their magic forever, as it weakens. Instead, zzyzx was designed to last a very very very long time, but could be opened with certain strategies. Things meant to last forever rarely last as long as things meant to last a VERY LONG TIME. It’s just a matter of how they’re sealed.
I would say to seal something with a door is to give it a point where it knows it can get out. This is to focus its attention there instead of elsewhere. You can brace a door and prepare your people around just the door. In opposition with no door the seal entity will try all ways to get out and you need to spread out people to form a perimeter. Then again this would only help with simple creatures.
@@bobbypendergrass1977 doors, the entities is distracted by a possible opening vs searching for a weak point in your cell. . Why carve a hole in the room when there's a door with hinges x0 If you're so powerful hinges seem easier to break down vs making a new door.
This idea could work, especially since they had announced Deadpool 3 would be the last of the Deadpool movies, but also a Marvel Studios movie. I wasn't sure how it could be both, but your theory could help explain it.
7:16 Ha. No. What we actually want is for the actual/original/non-rebooted X-men movies (Hugh Jackman, Ryan Reynolds, etc) to be in MCU. No reboot, no remakes, just for them to be made part of the MCU.
Technically that was a wall, made of Dragon scales. And it wasn't sealed, so much as the alternate universe the dwellers came from was blocked off from our universe.
13:45 - I theorize that Tao-Lo used them purely mechanically, and lived off their essence, hence the magic used was none at all or very little. Where as Shan-Chi also knew magic his mother taught him which had him use the rings not only more efficiently, but actually turn them "ON" with his magic. Think of it like a laptop. Some one can use a laptop to hold open a door, or bash something, or just leave it plugged in to keep warm off the charger, but it isn't REALLY being used, not enough to be caught by a system online. But someone who actually knows how to use a laptop, turns it on and get it online, now it can be seen online and is correctly being used. To compare this to Shang-Chi, Tao-Lo (Mandarin) used the Rings in a brutish, cave-man manner, as he used them purely physically, not using magic. Where as Shang-Chi knowing magic was able to activate them and use them correctly. That's my theory...a comment theory!
MatPat: "So you see how all of these things are pointing towards the Dweller in Darkness and the X-Men? You see where I'm going with this? That's right, GALACTUS!" I love your leaps in logic man! xD
I remember X-men. I recall the story bounced around a lot, but that's fair with such a big cast getting a lot of time to develop. It was so much better than Spider-man's 80 part Sins of the Father saga.
Just to throw it out there, X-Men Animated Series was revived a few years ago after the recent version of Secret Wars called X-Men '92. While not a direct sequel, it used much of the show's factors as a jumping off point, making it a spiritual successor of the series.
About the rings and Shang-chi using them. I think the father wasn’t really “using” the rings in the way that Shang-chi used them the first time he fully did to defeat the dweller in darkness. His father used them in a different way but Shang-chi and his mother used the rings in a more powerful/correct way hints the color change and Shang-chi was the only one that let them explode.
To be fair, it is very hard to trap an entity behind a wall, especially a big wall. Walls are not meant to be moved through, so not only do you have to lure it to where the wall can be erected, but you must also keep it there long enough to do so. And in defense of the people of Ta Lo, they did seem to put up a barrier of the strongest material they had at hand, which took multiple hits from one of the strongest weapons they knew of to damage enough for the Dweller to break free. Would dropping an additional mountain or three onto the 'door' been ideal? Yes. Practical? Idk
Alright. I can’t be the only one thinking that theyre making everyone a little TOO powerful? I mean there are literal unkillable beings and then there’s good old Spidey beating up some thugs on the street in the same universe. Doesn’t make much sense to me.
Oh thank god, I thought I was the only one thinking this! I guess it's obvious why, though. NWH is coming out soon, and lots of people are searching for it online. Easy peasy clickbait material 🙃
8:30 Matpat: "Not sure how to end a series? Just end the universe! No more characters means no more stories to tell." Hirohiko Araki: "I can do better than that."
Galactus was the lone survivor of his UNIVERSE. Technically, that includes his galaxy - but the emphasis is that he's the lone being that survived the collapse of his universe.
There's a Few Things That Contradict this Theory... 1. It's Been Almost 100% Confirmed at this Point that Some of the Fox X-Men will be In MOM 2. The Thing The Rings Are Calling To Probably Isn't Galactus, But Their Original Owner In the Comics... Fin Fang Foom And 3. There Has Been a Newly Owned Fox Characters MCU Movie Announced, The Fantastic Four Movie, Set for 2023
I dunno if matpat forgot a detail but in order to seal someone or something then you should first put it in and in order to do that you need an opening.
5:45 sorry but random side note I didn't know they were making a sequel but me and my family used to love hocus pocus when I was a kid but I hope they don't ruin what made it funny in the sequel haha
Matpat's marvel theories are always correct... thirty percent of the time.
ua-cam.com/video/XvF7xlZ9PWM/v-deo.html
hope that these 3 on top are the only bots who's gonna comment here
True that
I still think it's Shima gorath
Danganrompa vibes right here
I want a theory that calculates how often MatPat’s theories are accurate
and Austin definitely has to be the one to make it
"THE SCIENCE OF... MATPAT?"
Up
@@ninjaned1000 I second this notion.
60%
fr tho, I would love to see it, maybe we should request from austin
Yeah actually, why ‘do’ people lock overpowered evil entities behind areas that you would otherwise expect to have access at some point? Doors, caves, or whatever else
You have to close it behind them. Maybe you could walk it off after but the door had to be there in the first place.
Good luck making a solid and strong enough wall while the monster is inside. With doors, they can create them earlier and just lock 'em when the monster crosses.
maybe because building a wall around the creature would take too long? i feel like the "doors" and "caves" function more like snares, cages or jailcells, where they have to exist prior to the lockup, and have to have an entrance so that the creature can be locked up quicker? but idk that's just one way to look at it
It's basic rules of most witchery/magic: Where there is a beginning, there MUST be an end. There has to be a way for them to be released/unleashed
@@lostmonkey but you can just make wall on top of the door
"Why do people always lock things behind doors instead of walls?"
Actually, I read a book that had an answer to this. I don't know if it applies in this situation, since they're two COMPLETELY different universes, but since they're both magical doors trapping giant magical creatures in a different dimension, I would assume it's close enough.
I don't remember it very well, but the basic idea was that "when sealing something with magic, there _has_ to be a way to undo it. If there isn't, the magic starts to unravel itself, weakening until it no longer works properly. If there's a way to undo it, no matter how difficult, the magic stays functional for an almost infinite amount of time."
Plus, it's just common sense. If there's a door, then people will focus on trying to get through that door, and won't realise that they could just destroy it much easier.
Another reason could possibly be that they needed a way to get the thing in there. If they conjured a wall in front of it, or built a wall, it might take a lot longer than simply closing a door.
Yes I know that was a joke, I laughed at it and realised it was a joke immediately. I just find this subject fascinating, and I'll take any excuse to dig through a book.
Sounds like something from a Discworld novel
Building a box to lure something in and lock it in definitely much easier to build the box around the something from scratch. You want to build a garage and lure a mad car driver into it, not have them park the car and build the garage around it.
The book might be the Fablehaven series, one of the main characters asked why the giant demon prison had a way of releasing the demons inside and another character said something like what you put in your comment
ill take any excuse to dig through the earth. im suicidal ;)
I feel like the magic was being sustained on an ongoing basis by the good dragon so deterioration wasn't a concern.
The most impressive part about this movie is that they taught those Dragons to act. I mean if those Dragons could act, imagine what someone like I could do
Haha. Underrated comment
Best line tbh
Honestly man they should hire meee
Dead...
*I'm not actually dead.. It's an act. Play along.
I’m sorry the Grammy goes to Morris
A door is how you efficiently get out after putting the monster on the other side. You should absolutely build a wall on the outside of the door, but it would take to long to build the wall while there is an open space for it to escape through
Who cares about the one that trapped the monster? They agree to sacrifice themselves in the first place so bye
That's what the guy signed up for as soon as he agreed to build it
Couldn't you like you know get out close the door then wall it up seems like closing the door works
This comment is so strange without context.
Agreed the should have built a wall after closing the door.
This is a real stretch. I think they just made the Dweller in Darkness a generic monster because they had no plans to use him as anything more. They actually use it the same way in the Guardians of the Galaxy game.
most of the stuff about the xmen in the mcu felt like a stretch, but the stuff about the potential villians/wanda being called to actually sounded realistic! If I had to guess he’s probably PARTIALLY correct lol
He also messed up the fact that X-Men 87 is a sequel to the show, not a reboot of it
@@robbyb3ll4s Though, it being a sequel would actually fit better with the theory on how it will be ending like it did in the comics.
@@starryeyes5534 A stretch? Are you kidding? The stuff about X-men ‘97 sounds so legit. I’ll be surprised if none of it whatsoever is true.
Plus the question still remains where are the X men in present day MUC? Sure X men 97 might have given rise to Galan, Galactus and present day MUC and Galactus might be the upcoming big baddie but where does X men fit now?
I love how Spider-Man had absolutely nothing to do with this theory
Give me rent.
Clickbait 😔
I know its weird so ye I am watching after no way home to see how accurate he was and got clickbaited lol
There was some of spider man no way home in it
“You’re not Peter Parker”
“No, this is Patrick!”
ua-cam.com/video/XvF7xlZ9PWM/v-deo.html
Uhhhhhhhhhhh
Multiverse?
😂
wrong dimesion moment
batman beyond movie cast 1m views ua-cam.com/video/77qt7dMzkKE/v-deo.html
_They’ve done studies, you know. Sixty percent of the time, Matpat’s theories are right every time!_
I understood that reference.
"68% of online theories are made up as they are being written." ~Thomas Jefferson
@@oliviawilde5646 wtf
Never seen the movie and I understood that reference.
Hehe *Bots*
I just want Deadpool to randomly walk by the scaffolding fight scene and nonchalantly say “Not my cat, not my fight” and he just continues to walk past the huge fight, ignoring it completely. Lol
ua-cam.com/video/XvF7xlZ9PWM/v-deo.html
lol
That’d be great honestly
@J i m i e Claw________💋 begone
alpha teens on mahcines 80k views ua-cam.com/video/CeCKWLyhUBg/v-deo.html
There’s actually a reference to the Fantastic 4 in Spider-Man 2. When Peter and MJ swing to the ground before the Mysterio announcement framing Peter, you can see wall barriers on the street behind them, saying: “we can’t wait to show you what’s next! 1… 2… 3… ?”
I'm surprised that the possibility that the "Dweller in Darkness" we saw in Shang-chi was not actually the "Dweller in Darkness" wasn't brought up. I mean, it's totally possible that the big dragon thing was just a general, a "mid-level boss", as it were. It just seemed weird that before the door opened, it acted as a skillful manipulator, but as soon as the seal broke it was just "Rawr big monster"...
to be honest, once the door was open, asking very nicely woulnt have gotten it anything right in front of that village :/
@@seelfire4725 "Greetings, I'm the Dweller in Darkness, pleased to meet you all. If you would be so kind as to let me past, I would not be forced to steal all your souls. By the way, did you all realize that I could have literally flown in any other direction than this town? Not installing a giant net or barrier around the door was a very poor decision..."
@@insertclevernamehere1186 The village is at the portal to earth. If the dweller decides hes cool not destroying our reality, there's really nothing to be gained by forcing a confrontation. Nothing wrong with that.
That is consistent with marvel/Disney's MO. Introducing a big bad and then leaving it to simmer off screen while subtly implying that it might be dead or just another power below an even bigger threat.
More than likely one of the fear lords Kkallakku
"Doctor Strange, huh that guy keeps showing up in weird places these days, doesn't he?"
I never knew being omnipresent was one of his powers
First reply let's gooooo, hola
@@samuelcholula381 how sad is it that we get excited when bots don't comment first
yo i think you’re just some guy without a moustache
More like wong, the dude is appearing everywhere. Shang chi, spiderman, doctor strange 2, she hulk
I am seein' you in weird places too omnipresent (without a) mustache bub!
Last night I saw you in the dark pits of you know what Hub \l/
Since Matpat says X men is coming i can safety assume X Men wont be appearing in No Way Home
It’s funny how most of MatPat’s theories almost always are ways to predict what’s NOT going to happen, but still somewhat in a weird way makes sense (unless it’s a theory like Ness = Sans).
Because they're already home
Look to be fair he did predict Shang Chi
write there " *iva kivock in pelea goala* " ua-cam.com/video/fV5G5SOhAFc/v-deo.html
Same
A theory that calculates how often matpat theories are correct, the accuracy over the lifetime of his channels and it needs to be hosted by Austin. THE SCIENCE 🔬
The part where Matpat said that the Dweller of Darkness probably talked to Wanda as her kids freaking BLEW MY MIND!!! I feel like that could 100% have happened
I mean there are more fearlords
what trailer is that in? i want to watch it but i can't find it
@@endoverlord423 it’s a post credit scene in WandaVision
i don’t think they’d connect the two characters like that. she definitely heard her kids, but probably from another universe
Woooooooooowwwwww
This was a great theory, I agree with it, but it really didn't have much to do with Spider-Man or No Way Home. It was much more focused on Shiang-Chi.
Gotta get people to click
Gotta ride the NWH hype lmao
I think he was telling about future of mcu, not just about the spiderman movie. Like in after credit scenes, they can reveal about xmen or venom, and these villains from other universes
@@abidulmuhaiminrahbar Well yeah, but then why's No Way Home the main portion of the title other than clickbait?
True, probably because of click bait. NWH is coming out this month though so maybe he's hoping something will happen in it to help tie into the theory?
I have a theory.... Feige waits for MapPat to post, and revises his scripts accordingly.
Matpats strat for the perfect theory for how they bring over the FOX characters is to just do like, 50 theories about it and one will end up being right
I thought I'd get some witty replies but all I'm greeted with are bots.
That's largely been his strat for Fnaf, too...and Bendy...and...well, everything...
Isn't that how any theorist "career" works?
I'm not sure how much comic reading you've done MatPat but it's worth mentioning that the 10 rings used by the Mandarin come from the civilization of Fing Fang Foom. Also if Galactus were to invade our heroes in the MCU would also have to clash with his heralds, which is one reason it would also be hard for Galactus to be manipulated.
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
Fing Fang Foom was laready mentioned on a theory about shang chi
Not necessarily, the MCU doesn’t have to play by the rules in the comics - and it rarely does anyway
BRO GALACTUS EATS PLANETS, THE PLANETS ARE CELESTIALS, GALACTUS EATS CELESTIALS
Silver Surfer anyone?
I'm still not convinced. I'm pretty sure the MCU is going to bring in Spider-Ham
ua-cam.com/video/XvF7xlZ9PWM/v-deo.html
Ah yes, BOT COMMENTS. Exactly what ruins a good comment...
To be honest, I still think it's actually the many angled one aka Shima gorath
I'm calling it right now (only half-joking), the other two Spiders in No Way Home will be Spider-Ham and Spider Noir.
There! Now I'll get bragging rights if, by some stroke of luck or absurdity, I'm proven right!
@@mc-rn8ro makes sense. Marvel needs Nicolas Cage before he stays with DC as Superman (he played Superman in the Teen Titans Go movie)
*MatPat:* WHY NOT MAKE WALLS? Walls aren't meant to be opened!
*Movie logic:* No, silly they're meant to be broken! The result would've been the same either way.
a true statement if ive ever seen one
Wong walking in to ask MatPat about theories is just… perfect.
ua-cam.com/video/Cmp1R7frXWw/v-deo.html
.
This comment is just…. Perfect
Remind me never to read the comments before watching the video
L
ua-cam.com/video/TML6wJuxukc/v-deo.html
To be fair you can’t just put a giant monster in a room and expect it to just sit still while you build a wall, so you build the door ahead of time and put him in and shut the door
You could build a wall in front of the Door
Put a door and cover it with a wall. Problem solved
......then build a wall infront of the door....
But the issue is there's still a door behind the wall, a door that can be opened
@@strifenineteen doesn't make difference if there is a door or not behind a wall in your context.
Some things might be right, some things might be wrong.
When MatPat theorizes, the odds is 50/50 all along!
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
I don’t think he’s right even half the time
I love how Spider-Man No Way Home, Doctor Strange Multiverse of Madness and X-Men 97 had nothing to do with this theory
Matpat: “I’m not mad, just disappointed!”
LEVEL UP! From Barbeque Dad, to True Dad!
Yeah, lol
More like MadPat
A lot of Dragon Ball References in this one
Yes
Quite
Ok an ratio
Wrong verse
Yep
Was it just me or did you forget what the video was about because he kept switching to x-men, Spider-Man, erternals, the comics, and Shang-chi?
It's just you
May: “Walls are not meant to be opened!”
Wall keeping Springtrap…trapped: *Am I a joke to you?*
I blame Phone Dude. If it weren’t for him Springtrap would’ve been left to rot rather than becoming a glitch rabbit that’s also a 50ft trash rabbit (for some reason)
@@AlexDayz gamer moment
What's the reference here?
@@godiegolem fnaf
@@godiegolem 3
I theorized that Xu Wenwu, masked the intended use of the rings using a spell that gave the rings their blue hue when in his possession. When Shang-Chi started using the rings, the spell wasn't able to hold in his possession and gave off a yellow hue. It's original color. That's why the beacon wasn't reactivated until Shang-Chi started using the rings and they went back to being yellow.
Or maybe due to shang-chi's ancestral lineage in Ta Lo that gives him the connection to the Rings that Wenwu never have. Proly the City of Ta Lo has some connection to the Eternals or something
@@pandanganmatiyn1487 I like that theory better.
They also turned yellow for a moment when his mom temporarily took control of them. Wouldnt thatbe a bit of a hole in your theory?
@@aeashenemby no that strengthens the theory cuz she uses it so the seal isnt there
Marvel: dang it MatPat's got it right again, move the release day back by a year
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
They didn’t get it right, at all.
Stephanie and MatPat watching a movie: Steph: Matthew, please don’t start making any Theory’s while we’re watching this. I just wanna enjoy this film.
MatPat: Wait, what if…..
Steph: Oh No
Question: Why would the rings call out to Galactus? are they like actual dinner bells that were just flung into space by Galactus hoping they would land on a planet with sentient creatures that could use them? And why did it take Shang-Chi to use them for the beacon to activate? Was his dad not the right flavour of human for the beacon to turn on?
Maybe what he wanted was his mother's world
maybe galactus doesnt like oranges? so when it was used by the mandarins he didnt come
@@KAMUPhobies bruh
I think it's because Shang-Chi is the lineage, remember he is the son of Ying Li, a decendant of Ta Lo, so think that might be the reason, or atleast partial reason why the ring worked with Shang-Shi but not Xu Wenwu his dad, its because like I said Shang-Shi the decendant of Ta Lo, while his father is 100% human.
i think it activated when shang chi warrior because something about him whether it’s his age or strength or maybe even it’s memories read or something, told the rings that the earth was primed for being eaten. maybe beating the dweller told it that as now earth made creatures strong enough to do stuff like that
Galactus is one of those big baddies that has crossed paths with almost every Marvel property that exists, so he can easily fit where ever needed in a story and is impressive enough of a character to play a part - if not be - the cornerstone baddie. Another interesting fact is that CMON (company known for board games that also has a license for Marvel games) has a giant Galactus figure in their next game.
Okay, about the Rings and why Wong never noticed them...
They explain in the movie that the Mandarin's rings were made of a different energy compared to Shang Chi's. That is why Shang Chi's rings are a different color and seem to be more powerful than the Mandarin's.
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
@@basmaabdallah9077 why? Just why
They are the same rings
Yeah its the same rings. But he mentions that they seem to be from a different universe. I think they were in a sense activated when Shang Chi killed the dweller, that's what Wong and the others felt
@@basmaabdallah9077 thanks, now I know.
0:17 matpat’s inner fanboy for marvel is being released from its inprisionment
Didn’t even think about it, but wouldn’t it be too ambitious for one ambitious movie?
Probably, however this is MatPat we’re talking about.
If the MCU ever end in a very satisfying way, then rewatching it 10 years will be amazing
Endgame was a great ending. It was Iron Man’s story
Okay, I hear you, but hear me out...
This is a cool theory but we know Kevin Feige likes to keep it simple, so I think we'll get Galactus with a little simplified storyline. Like how Tony Stark built Ultron instead of Hank Pym, or how the origins of a lot of characters' powers are changed to be explained with an interaction with the infinity stones now. I think he'll just be a celestial that doesn't like other celestials' ways. Or maybe he "merged" with a celestial right before the celestial was born and destroyed his planet, so now he devours planets to stop celestials from being born etc. (just like how he merged with the sentience of the universe) I'm just spitballing here, but I think if they made Ego a celestial, making Galactus a celestial as well to simplify his backstory for the general audience makes sense.
But I thought of Galactus as well when they said the rings started a beacon. (I watched the movie after I watched Eternals so I knew they didn't belong to them.) I think they might belong to one of Galactus' old heralds, like Air-Walker. He's a good candidate because he's from Xandar which is already established in the MCU, his powers are vague enough that they could be bent to the powers of the rings, he doesn't already have an iconic object like Silver Surfer's board or Firelord's staff, and I don't think he's a popular enough character to make people mad just because he's killed off in the past. (That one Air-Walker fan reading this, I'm sorry, but come on.) Plus, the explanation for his powers are quite similar to how Eternals' powers are explained in the movie (that's true for most heralds I believe), which would tie in nicely with making Galactus a Celestial (just a copy-paste from marvel fandom .com because I'm lazy);
_"The original Air-Walker possessed the vast cosmic power that Galactus granted to all of his heralds upon their initiation. His body was restructured to be a living battery of cosmic energy, the Air-Walker could utilize cosmic power for a variety of effects: heat, concussive force, magnetism, electricity, etc. Unlike most of the other heralds, the Air-Walker utilized this cosmic energy without an accompanying visible manifestation (such as Firelord's "cosmic flame")."_
Also, I believe Air-Walker was featured in a Marvel game recently, Marvel Contest of Champions. They sometimes introduce comic book versions of some characters to mobile games like Contest of Champions and Marvel Future Fight before they're introduced in the movies. So maybe there's something to that as well.
This just popped into my mind... Now that's kind of a separate theory, but, if they apply how Air-Walker was created to Eternals, I think that would solve some issues I had with them. Like, if Eternals are robots, how can Thanos and Starfox be brothers? Or, why was Sprite created as a child in the first place? Why were they given emotions and personalities? If they were " *restructured* to be a living battery of cosmic energy" instead of being *created* as robots, I think that would answer a lot of those questions. Maybe Celestials came to Titan and created a bunch of robots for themselves? And that could explain why Titan was weird like that and how it was destroyed, why Thanos didn't just double the resources, and he destroyed half of the population instead, etc.
Peter quill ends up being galactus, Sincerely, A time traveler.
@@rinzzler366 so Lego Movie 2?
Cool I guess
Just a reminder that in the story where the planets produce superpowered entities as "antibodies" to protect the celestial eggs in their cores, Galactus consumes these planets not just because he's hungry but as a counterbalance to the propagation of the celestials and their potential "overpopulation".
2:52
For argument's sake I'm just gonna say that's because doors are also easier to close than walls, because they can actually be closed.
Logically it does seem to be easier to trap something in a room by just quickly pushing a door closed, rather than asking it to politely stand still while you build a whole wall.
Obviously, there's still some flaws with that in certain contexts of thing being sealed e.g when the door is actually built around them rather than just shut on them. And even in the contexts where it makes sense it still usually leaves the question of "Ok, but now the door's closed you could've still built a wall or even walls in front of it right?"
But at least there are some somewhat decent arguments to be made.
I'm not gonna make a Cask of Amontillado joke...I'm not gonna make a Cask of Amontillado joke...
What if the wall closes like a door to be a wall again.
When is a door not a door? when it is a wall.
Thats assuming the door was already there to begin with. If they have to build it, it takes more time to build a door than a wall.
But usually in stories to explain why, they tend to give an answer of "they were buying time to learn how to truly defeat it " of making the item or person still accessible
My bet is they intended to build a wall after they close the door, but then think “You know what, that’s probably good enough.” and just left it like a rough draft of an essay.
X-men are so dope in the comics. I hope we see more comic accurate version of them.
Be gone *bot*
Agreed they did Cyclops so dirty.
I'm sorry, fanboy but Disney/ Marvel will never make a better X-Men movie than Days of Future Past
impossible
put real actors in those original consumes, average movie goer is just walking back out the door.
There is NOTHING good about how the originals looked back tyen.
Accurate?
It's so cool that Film Theory has enough episodes for a real Marvel style flipbook opening. Also, that wasn't really a door, it didn't have hinges or a handle, it technically WAS a wall, made out of dragon scales. And I would love to see what could come out if Disney ever purchased the rights to the Warcraft franchise.
Watching this after No Way Home. Oh MatPat, you fool.
Nothing has been disproven yet
This movie is gonna be such a nostalgia trip for me. Very excited!
You should do a Gravity Rush/ Gravity Rush 2 theory on whether or bot the city on the world pillar would be able to support itself with the amount of space given, and whether the city would stay upright
ua-cam.com/video/iPrUs_0zKQ4/v-deo.html
I’m commenting just cuz I feel bad you got hit with 5 bots
@@destroyerzh thanks
All of MatPat’s incorrect theories are actually correct in alternate timelines.
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
There are other timelines?
Yes!
How many did you see?
14,000,605.
How many was MatPat right?
All of them... But one... This one. He's wrong in this future, but all the other ones. He's dead on right.
14:44
Matpat... Thats Ultron... Not Galactus
Hey MatPat and theorists, I’d like to point out that you said the upcoming X-Men ‘97 was the only Fox Marvel property to be announced, but an MCU Fantastic 4 was actually announced a while ago.
Great theory, and keep up the great work!
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
He meant the only announcement fir Disney + day.
I didn't know the xmen cartoon was a fox property bc I remember watching it on DisneyXD as a kid
Trevor had some of the funniest scenes in the movie.
"If they could teach the monkeys to act that brilliantly, just imagine what I could bring to the world"
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
the rings were strong enough to break the prison and the dweller in darkness had not eaten in thousands of years aside from the few souls gained during the battle, which increased its strength noticeably each time. presumably in the original final battle it was well fed and thus MUCH stronger
This theory makes so much more sense now because of the dead pool leaks
Do you have a theory?
That’s my secret, Wong,
*im always theorizing*
@J i m i e Claw________💋 be gone bot
@@JacksonOnUA-cam just report them
We were overdo for an incorrect but entertaining MCU theory. Thanks Matt.
Off topic but I love how you still say "that's just a theory... A FILM/GAME theory!". Makes my old adult heart giggle in childhood
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
"that would leave -um... 10-2 is um.. ✨less than 10✨"
*MATHPAT*
They already teased Galactus in one of the 'What if' episodes. When the Watcher is being slammed through dimensions by Ultimatron, you can see a glimpse of him taking a bite of the planet they're on.
No that was Ultron
@@SubZero-hs9xc no, you can clearly see the silhoutte of Galactus' headpiece.
@@ZainNL is Ultron
That fight
it is made to be a reference to Galactus but if you see well it is Ultron
@@ZainNL its ultron.
Matpat marking a marvel theory is just the best 10 to 20 minutes of my life
ua-cam.com/video/Cmp1R7frXWw/v-deo.html
.
Frfr
i personally think that the beacon at the end is calling fin fang foom, considering fin fang foom is an alien dragon. Also, in the comics, the 10 rings are just a power source for fin fang foom's species that they accidentally left behind. i think that in the next shang chi movie, fin fang foom is going to try to recover the 10 rings for his homeworld: Kakaranthara
edit: i added some detail
13:40
my guess as far as why they noticed Shang-Chi's use and not WenWu's might be due to the power level usage.
Wenwu's power usage of the rings was probably at a basic or average level of magic usage that might not get all that much notice with all the regular magic that gets used on Earth. You'd have to be REALLY looking for that unique magic signature and scrolling through subsections of magic to notice and find it. But Shang-Chi in that movie probably pushed the power intensity when he fought The Dweller in Darkness, that surpassed the base-line magic levels Khamar Taj would notice. And that got Wong to look into the specifics of what was going on and to seek out Shang-Chi himself.
I really want to see a Marvel movie with Matpat being the one who made the whole story.
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
Please no
14:25
10-2= Less than 10
Wish my Math was this good.
Here is a Theory: What in the World is Scarlet Witch's Powers Called and What is it
Chaos magic i let you guess the second one
Why is he always right?(deadpool and wolverine big bad is Cassandra nova a mutant bro
4:47 that's vilgax omg Ben 10 crossover with Marvel official
I think something you over looked, is that producers at marvel had seid they don't want to do live action Xmen because it will extend the MCU's life by 10 years
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
that makes 0 sense. Xmen are coming. Just not until at least 2023/4
I want the 90's animated X-Men to port directly over from their animated universe into the MCU. Not as cartoons but realistic versions of those same characters complete w/ their respective colorful costumes & personalities. The MCU likes to do things not seen b4. & we have yet to see those iconic & beloved costumes on the big screen.
'90s*
if/when the mcu does introduce galactus and the silver surfer, I want them to be from the silver surfer show.
Xu Wenwu didn’t activate the beacon on the 10 rings because he “wasn’t worthy” and that’s why he also never unlocked their full potential. That’s why Shang Chi was able to use them so easily and so strong from the beginning.
“Why do people seal things behind doors” well matpat, fable haven has a very good explanation. Magical prisons built to last forever don’t hold their magic forever, as it weakens. Instead, zzyzx was designed to last a very very very long time, but could be opened with certain strategies. Things meant to last forever rarely last as long as things meant to last a VERY LONG TIME. It’s just a matter of how they’re sealed.
That's a pretty good point.
I would say to seal something with a door is to give it a point where it knows it can get out. This is to focus its attention there instead of elsewhere. You can brace a door and prepare your people around just the door. In opposition with no door the seal entity will try all ways to get out and you need to spread out people to form a perimeter. Then again this would only help with simple creatures.
Wasn’t expecting a comment about Fablehaven on a Theory video, but it’s a very pleasant surprise.
@@bobbypendergrass1977 doors, the entities is distracted by a possible opening vs searching for a weak point in your cell.
.
Why carve a hole in the room when there's a door with hinges x0
If you're so powerful hinges seem easier to break down vs making a new door.
This idea could work, especially since they had announced Deadpool 3 would be the last of the Deadpool movies, but also a Marvel Studios movie. I wasn't sure how it could be both, but your theory could help explain it.
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
Deadpool 3 will not be the last of the Deadpool movies. He is way too popular of a character.
@@thetoybox4333 the last of the Fox ones, going by the contract that he'd still have a trilogy. But it would be a Marvel Studios project as well.
7:16
Ha. No. What we actually want is for the actual/original/non-rebooted X-men movies (Hugh Jackman, Ryan Reynolds, etc) to be in MCU. No reboot, no remakes, just for them to be made part of the MCU.
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html.
But MatPat, here’s the wrinkle in this theory. The Dweller-In-Darkness is locked in another universe, where Ta Lo is located.
Technically that was a wall, made of Dragon scales. And it wasn't sealed, so much as the alternate universe the dwellers came from was blocked off from our universe.
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
That's what I said, it's not like mandarin was opening it with a handle or something, he was breaking it.
13:45 - I theorize that Tao-Lo used them purely mechanically, and lived off their essence, hence the magic used was none at all or very little. Where as Shan-Chi also knew magic his mother taught him which had him use the rings not only more efficiently, but actually turn them "ON" with his magic.
Think of it like a laptop. Some one can use a laptop to hold open a door, or bash something, or just leave it plugged in to keep warm off the charger, but it isn't REALLY being used, not enough to be caught by a system online. But someone who actually knows how to use a laptop, turns it on and get it online, now it can be seen online and is correctly being used.
To compare this to Shang-Chi, Tao-Lo (Mandarin) used the Rings in a brutish, cave-man manner, as he used them purely physically, not using magic. Where as Shang-Chi knowing magic was able to activate them and use them correctly.
That's my theory...a comment theory!
There were no sky beams in Shang Chi, but there was a beacon. Nicely done Marvel.
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
"Why do people always lock things behind doors instead of walls?"
Springtrap: 😐
0:35 tho, that intro was ✨immaculate✨
3:00 Technically they did seal the big dragon monster behind a wall made of dragon scales
"I've got Keven Feige."
'And I'VE got! A cease and desist.'
I felt like the Dragons fit perfectly with the Eastern philosophy and history of the film.
MatPat: "So you see how all of these things are pointing towards the Dweller in Darkness and the X-Men? You see where I'm going with this? That's right, GALACTUS!" I love your leaps in logic man! xD
I remember X-men. I recall the story bounced around a lot, but that's fair with such a big cast getting a lot of time to develop. It was so much better than Spider-man's 80 part Sins of the Father saga.
Mat: *calls shang-chi the best phase 4 movie yet* (timestamp: 0:58)
No Way Home: I missed the part where that's my problem.
0:45 not me instinctively saying NINETEEN
Just to throw it out there, X-Men Animated Series was revived a few years ago after the recent version of Secret Wars called X-Men '92. While not a direct sequel, it used much of the show's factors as a jumping off point, making it a spiritual successor of the series.
Wowww ua-cam.com/video/FSSFgWlDbJU/v-deo.html
About the rings and Shang-chi using them. I think the father wasn’t really “using” the rings in the way that Shang-chi used them the first time he fully did to defeat the dweller in darkness. His father used them in a different way but Shang-chi and his mother used the rings in a more powerful/correct way hints the color change and Shang-chi was the only one that let them explode.
Matpat: gets served a cease and desist.
Matpat: Oh no! Anyway, heres Thanos.
@Joshua EdwinRoehl what is this link to?
Bro predicted the end of Deadpool and wolverine trailer in the thumbnail
To be fair, it is very hard to trap an entity behind a wall, especially a big wall. Walls are not meant to be moved through, so not only do you have to lure it to where the wall can be erected, but you must also keep it there long enough to do so. And in defense of the people of Ta Lo, they did seem to put up a barrier of the strongest material they had at hand, which took multiple hits from one of the strongest weapons they knew of to damage enough for the Dweller to break free. Would dropping an additional mountain or three onto the 'door' been ideal? Yes. Practical? Idk
Alright. I can’t be the only one thinking that theyre making everyone a little TOO powerful? I mean there are literal unkillable beings and then there’s good old Spidey beating up some thugs on the street in the same universe. Doesn’t make much sense to me.
Shang-Chi has the rings but stil is human.
I like how this video had almost nothing to do with Spider-man. Like, why even put him in the title of the video, and not Shang-chi?
Oh thank god, I thought I was the only one thinking this! I guess it's obvious why, though. NWH is coming out soon, and lots of people are searching for it online. Easy peasy clickbait material 🙃
@@177StingRay Yeah, though it's not Mats fault specifically, it seems like they've been click-baiting us a lot recently.
After watching the first season X-Men 97 it look likes MatPat was cooking years ago
8:30
Matpat: "Not sure how to end a series? Just end the universe! No more characters means no more stories to tell."
Hirohiko Araki: "I can do better than that."
R E S E T
Galactus was the lone survivor of his UNIVERSE. Technically, that includes his galaxy - but the emphasis is that he's the lone being that survived the collapse of his universe.
There's a Few Things That Contradict this Theory...
1. It's Been Almost 100% Confirmed at this Point that Some of the Fox X-Men will be In MOM
2. The Thing The Rings Are Calling To Probably Isn't Galactus, But Their Original Owner In the Comics... Fin Fang Foom
And 3. There Has Been a Newly Owned Fox Characters MCU Movie Announced, The Fantastic Four Movie, Set for 2023
Also Kevin announced a future project called The Mutants.
@@orderly_chaos_crochet Never Heard of That, Thanks for the Info
I dunno if matpat forgot a detail but in order to seal someone or something then you should first put it in and in order to do that you need an opening.
5:45 sorry but random side note I didn't know they were making a sequel but me and my family used to love hocus pocus when I was a kid but I hope they don't ruin what made it funny in the sequel haha
Doctor Strange: *has a mug*
Matpat: “oMG coNSpIraCY cOnfIrmED!”