@@khaulezaskhosana5062it was the Muslims that burnt all those ancient books in Egypt, some where smuggled into East and west Africa, but cannot be translated now
Greeks had no alphabets, only the ancient Egyptians could read and write. What papers were the Greeks writing on. Herodotus never existed. Europeans wrote themselves into history because they control information.
Wow, you used the word “alphabet”, do you know the word “ALPHAbet” contains the first Greek letter? So not only did they have letters, also the impact of them having letters was so huge, that humanity uses this word (alpha(bet)) to describe all letters….. only to have people like you arranging letters into complete nonsense in the comment section….. sad. Now pls continue your empty life.
Dear Bruce, i've got a youtube channel all on ancient Egyptian architecture, i'd love to enter in contact with you for a podcast episode, i contacted the Ross Institute for your contact, if by any chance this comment will be seen by the institute i'd like to reach out to you soon ;) all the best, LM
@@Taharqo.saved.the.Hebrew.. only if you accept the given dating of ancient history.. There are some scientists, which gave evidenz, there are mistaken in this. One reason is in the begining of modern archeology, which was based of the bible/start with Abrahams age! in Ur.. the bible was by the time kicked out, but not the dating if Ur.. and from this on it s starts to get wrong (that s why are also the 600 year dark age in greece..!) Also it can find a gap allover between 6.and 9th century in much archeology sites around the world. What, if "Djoser" is such a title like Emporer, and like a Emporer in European, there are kings too..? Meaning :they are not one after one, they are at same time ? Without iron they could not be build! So :they are made to "earlier"! And if you look by architecture :you go from simpelst to best.. and by this, Gizeh must be made at least, not in begin.
If there were any written knowledge on brick cutting or shaping, it might have been lost in burning of the library of Alexandria. For what I understand, the library was comprehensive, covering all technical knowhow from the old kingdom to the time it was burned.
@@Taharqo.saved.the.Hebrew actually it has already been proven, the ancient Egyptians made a composite material like concrete and poured the blocks into molds.
@christian smith ok. The granite the stones where cut to build the pyramid, which are precision cut. Came from Aswan. That’s 420 miles away. They each weighed between 2.5 - 15 tonnes. They where precision cut with no imperfections, despite the only material to cut each stone was copper tools and basalt rock. There have never been any hieroglyphs found in there. Despite what you’ve read. This explains it a lot better than me. There are pyramids all over the world. The truth is not what they are peddling. www.bizsiziz.com/the-great-pyramid-of-giza-a-mathematically-encoded-structure/
@christian smith Obelisks. Know loads about them. I do know this though. I could be completely wrong. Also, you could be completely wrong. I’m fine with that. Sounds like your institutionalised with your knowledge. Don’t be too rigid. You’ll end up breaking. P.s. the pyramids where built by aliens and they seeded life on Earth......Now.......here’s Tom with the weather.....
Not a single inscription into the large pyramids, and also not a single sarcophagus or mummy. The large pyramids are impossible to make with primitive tools. They clearly were not tombs, as the structures are not made for humans, pyramids are not architectural spaces: they are machines.
Greek roman had no alphabet they copied and plagarism from ancient egyptian civilazilition and story in Rossetta stone in British Meseum also written in English Spanish French and Dutch and Portuguese.
Maybe believing in old theories of aliens sits well with you. Just like religion, instead of doing findings for ourselves you want to attribute everything to supernatural. Maybe aliens may not be supernatural but how do we even rich that conclusion if we never even met them. Primitive, I guess you don't even know what is primitive.
I'm asking if you pseudoscientist who appeals for a civilised contemporary explanations leaning to theories of ET with no proof are worth an exanation.
That seems shallow and superficial than those who gives a scholarly explanation and actually willing to say "we don't know" if they don't. Other than appealing to probable advance civilisation you cannot even prove it existed. The question is if any civilisation more advance than the current really existed, where did it vanished into. Surely if it's advance than our advanced technology who can't even tell of their previous existence, them they were not advance because they could have still here and might have surely survived whatever disasters the current civilisation knew to have threateningly went to pass.
![Quantum Physics: The Laws That Govern Our Universe [4K] | The Secrets of Quantum Physics | Spark](/img/n.gif)
The truth coming from this Professor!!
How can that Greek be the first historian when we know that Africans have been writing history for thousands of years
I think you should ask, why did they destroy a library that had all the African information in it.
@@khaulezaskhosana5062it was the Muslims that burnt all those ancient books in Egypt, some where smuggled into East and west Africa, but cannot be translated now
Because they’re liars and discriminates based on skin color 🤡
Greeks had no alphabets, only the ancient Egyptians could read and write. What papers were the Greeks writing on. Herodotus never existed. Europeans wrote themselves into history because they control information.
Well h*** the truth is the truth, A lie cannot stand forever
😂😂😂😂
Wow, you used the word “alphabet”, do you know the word “ALPHAbet” contains the first Greek letter? So not only did they have letters, also the impact of them having letters was so huge, that humanity uses this word (alpha(bet)) to describe all letters….. only to have people like you arranging letters into complete nonsense in the comment section….. sad. Now pls continue your empty life.
also have you ever heard about the Rosetta Stone?
That’s lie they tell u
Thank you Bruce for a really interesting talk. Please do more of these. Colleen
Fantastic facts
Check out Christopher Dunn's video The Giza Power Plant.
Dear Bruce, i've got a youtube channel all on ancient Egyptian architecture, i'd love to enter in contact with you for a podcast episode, i contacted the Ross Institute for your contact, if by any chance this comment will be seen by the institute i'd like to reach out to you soon ;) all the best, LM
But still no one can Show, how they could cut that "bricks" to right size at this time 2600 - 2560 BC..!!
What?,that's what you are arguing
They cut the bricks and then sanded down the rough edges to get a pristine finish, what's so hard to understand that
@@Taharqo.saved.the.Hebrew.. only if you accept the given dating of ancient history.. There are some scientists, which gave evidenz, there are mistaken in this.
One reason is in the begining of modern archeology, which was based of the bible/start with Abrahams age! in Ur.. the bible was by the time kicked out, but not the dating if Ur.. and from this on it s starts to get wrong (that s why are also the 600 year dark age in greece..!)
Also it can find a gap allover between 6.and 9th century in much archeology sites around the world.
What, if "Djoser" is such a title like Emporer, and like a Emporer in European, there are kings too..?
Meaning :they are not one after one, they are at same time ?
Without iron they could not be build! So :they are made to "earlier"!
And if you look by architecture :you go from simpelst to best.. and by this, Gizeh must be made at least, not in begin.
If there were any written knowledge on brick cutting or shaping, it might have been lost in burning of the library of Alexandria. For what I understand, the library was comprehensive, covering all technical knowhow from the old kingdom to the time it was burned.
@@Taharqo.saved.the.Hebrew actually it has already been proven, the ancient Egyptians made a composite material like concrete and poured the blocks into molds.
THE G.O.A.T
No “mummies” or hieroglyphs in the Giza pyramids.
@christian smith They are not tombs and never were.
@christian smith don’t be lazy. Do the research.
@christian smith ok. The granite the stones where cut to build the pyramid, which are precision cut. Came from Aswan. That’s 420 miles away. They each weighed between 2.5 - 15 tonnes. They where precision cut with no imperfections, despite the only material to cut each stone was copper tools and basalt rock. There have never been any hieroglyphs found in there. Despite what you’ve read. This explains it a lot better than me. There are pyramids all over the world. The truth is not what they are peddling. www.bizsiziz.com/the-great-pyramid-of-giza-a-mathematically-encoded-structure/
@christian smith You can be as condescending and confident as you like. Don’t give a monkeys 🐒 🐒 p.s read the article good sir.
@christian smith Obelisks. Know loads about them. I do know this though. I could be completely wrong. Also, you could be completely wrong. I’m fine with that. Sounds like your institutionalised with your knowledge. Don’t be too rigid. You’ll end up breaking. P.s. the pyramids where built by aliens and they seeded life on Earth......Now.......here’s Tom with the weather.....
Not a single inscription into the large pyramids, and also not a single sarcophagus or mummy. The large pyramids are impossible to make with primitive tools. They clearly were not tombs, as the structures are not made for humans, pyramids are not architectural spaces: they are machines.
Wilson Scott Miller Deborah Williams Donna
Greek roman had no alphabet they copied and plagarism from ancient egyptian civilazilition and story in Rossetta stone in British Meseum also written in English Spanish French and Dutch and Portuguese.
The History you never see in African schools 😪
seems very old superficial primitive explanation thats makes no sense for such a great mysterious monuments.
It makes complete sense. Maybe your narrative isn't working well?
Maybe believing in old theories of aliens sits well with you. Just like religion, instead of doing findings for ourselves you want to attribute everything to supernatural. Maybe aliens may not be supernatural but how do we even rich that conclusion if we never even met them. Primitive, I guess you don't even know what is primitive.
I'm asking if you pseudoscientist who appeals for a civilised contemporary explanations leaning to theories of ET with no proof are worth an exanation.
That seems shallow and superficial than those who gives a scholarly explanation and actually willing to say "we don't know" if they don't. Other than appealing to probable advance civilisation you cannot even prove it existed. The question is if any civilisation more advance than the current really existed, where did it vanished into. Surely if it's advance than our advanced technology who can't even tell of their previous existence, them they were not advance because they could have still here and might have surely survived whatever disasters the current civilisation knew to have threateningly went to pass.
Oh your one of those that thinks aliens came on space ships and decided to make pyramids in Africa 😂😂😂