My wife and I have a small 10 acre farm. We grow many fruits and vegetables and flowers. There is no way that someone with eyes and an open mind not be able to see the hand of GOD in all the beauty and complexity of life whether plant or animal. Each plant has a relationship with the bugs and the roots of such plants with the bacteria in the soil. I could go on for hours but I'll just cut it short and say thank you my heavenly Father and to GOD be the glory.
Those various organisms have a symbiotic relationship because they co-evolved with one another over millions of years. No god needed at all to explain how nature functions.
"We are surrounded by a world of incredible complexity, and beauty actually. And everything about the living world screams design. If you look at the way a body works, look at the way a body of any animal or any plant works -- it's clearly designed, you might think." --Richard Dawkins
I love that we can watch the entire documentary for free. This is how the academic world is supposed to function - the free exchange of ideas, honest scientific inquiry, and the search for knowledge.
100% agree. Got to laugh at a “scientific” community that is incapable of admitting their pet theory has long since outlived any plausible hope of support by physical evidence. 😂 God bless their darling hearts…
@@GilGTG Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people? This information isn't free, it's funded by tax payers and force fed to us for "free", and we are all uncritically indoctrinated into this atheistic origins mythology as young children. It's even in our cartoons and children's stories.
I plan on purchasing the documentary on DVD. Nothing is free. It wasn't free for these people to make this film. People deserve to be paid for their work and their knowledge, which can take decades to acquire. We should be willing to pay for their expertise.
I'm a teacher in a Christian School, to see this, and listen to this information, makes cry. Thank you My children and I are working a lesson on "Strada", and its formation. We have made several field trips to gather samples, and eventually will fill a jar to form "Strada" like sample. Now, I'm so excited to explain to them the truth. This is "Revival!".
@@wetshlovesusa2898 this is why the federal government doesn’t fund private schools who “teach” without understanding. First of all, define “strada” never heard that term in geology. Are you talking about deposited sedimentary layers of rock? After it’s been lithified?
I'm really glad this is up for free, when my pastor showed clips in church I was not yet saved, and rocks, fossils, biology, are all sciences that have peaked my interest, and I have a hard time seeing things and answering things without a secular evolutionist view.
You;re still not saved as there is no god. Without science, we would have nothing that we have today. We would still be living in caves, no farming, no anything really. The Bible itself is a thing because of science. Everything points to evolution(which has been documented), and nothing points to a god or creationism except for a belief.
Oh, you poor thing. You should open your Bible to Matt 28, Mark 16, Luke 24 & John 20. Be sure to read all 4 of these chapters before answering the following questions: 1. How many women visited the tomb of Jesus? 2. What did they see when they got there? It's often been said, "The fastest way to become and Atheist is to actually read the Bible."
The Glory of God is so evident in this documentary is mind blowing! i am speechless i have no word to express how grand God is to me right now! Magnificent awesome amazing still cannot express how GRAND our Creator God is! give Him PRAISE!
After seeing how quickly water ripped through North Carolina with Hurricane Helene in 2024 and changed the land so quickly, this theory about the Grand Canyon makes a lot of sense. A large amount of water can break down land so fast. Much faster than I realized.
Couldn't get to sleep & found this last night. I really loved it! So many scientific people explaining it. Now if i could just get some others to take a look at this explanation rather than just listening to the popular view point.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Oh boy! I hate to be the bearer of bad news Nicholas but here is Evidence for young Earth; Most dating methods gives a young world. Helium in atmosphere, Helium in ground, Meteor dust, Buildup of carbon 14, Human population, Natural plutonium, Sodium in sea, Sediment in sea, Erosion of continents, Earth's magnetic field, Oil leaks in earth, Natural gas in earth, Orphan radiohalos, Decay of rock magnetism, Tight bends in rocks, Coral reef growth, Oldest living plants, Human civilizations, River delta growth, Undersea oil seepage, Uranium in sea, Rotation of spiral galaxies, Decay of comets, Dust on the moon, Slowing of earth's rotation, Heat loss from earth, Niagara Falls erosion and many more. Billions of years is story telling.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Also there is no such thing as evolution (No evidence for it). You continue to lie to the students with no science to back it up.
Excellent work. I've had a foundation of God's Word and His Creation built into me as a young person and still greatly enjoy hearing the consistency and proof of God's existence and intentions in His Creation. Thanks for putting this together and giving us a great opportunity to review and strengthen the Truth.
This is a MUST watch for all world views. From "Creationism" to "Evolutionism", and all in between. Absolutely packed with fabulous information. There's something for everyone here in this documentary. Incredible world we live in... Shalom shalom.
Well, no. Most of the info is incorrect, from using a testing method on Mt St Helens that was not supposed to be used for anything younger than 2 million years old, which these people did, to comparing erosion in 2 different places with 2 different materials. It is much easier and quicker for ash to erode than it is for rock. But with the Shalom, you are cousins of Christianity and Judaism. Yes, we DO live in an incredible world, one that was not created by any god.
@@billybob4274 It's nice to see I'm not alone. Perhaps I can offer you a warning before engaging with these people. You and I must adhere to verifiable evidence and proven facts. Both of which will be denied, sometimes for reasons as blatantly ridiculous as, "your reality does not align with my delusions and feelings." We MUST also adhere to logic and reason, wherein these are two places the religiously challenged never dare go.
@@firecat3613it’s interesting that you came across this video and that you made a comment. Have you ever just wondered if you’re possibly wrong? Maybe not. You have come to your conclusion a long time ago and nothing will shake you is my guess. I hope that changes some day. I was once atheist. I read, asked questions, until I started reading the Bible I had no idea how powerful truth is and majestic God truly is. I started in Job and I was intrigued but when I read Genesis it started changing my world view. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made... Romans 1:20 ❤️
@@Kenlydfordyou literally just quoted the Bible as if that’s going to convince someone of your worldview. Imagine I’m trying to prove to you that the Quran is the holy word and I just use information in the Quran to convince you… I was religious, truly believed, was raised on it, prayed, though god was listening to my every thought. Then all I had to do was keep an open mind. Carefully study reason history, math, science. Realize that it’s impossible to part the Red Sea… and bam you realize the Bible is a story book and not meant to be taken literally. But it goes further, you start to realize that nothing on this planet at this very moment requires any miracles to work. Well then you think wow, if nothing has required god to exist, why would I believe they exist? Believe it all you want but, don’t act like atheist and agnostics finding a religion video (and having an open mind enough to watch it, or be entertained at the bad science and deception) is somehow evidence that the spirit brought them here. That’s just delusion man, believe all you want, free world to do that thanks to secular government
This documentary has changed my husband's belief! Thank you for making this documentary and posting this on youtube. My husband didn't believe in God and didn't believe there was a creator all his life until he watched this documentary in 2021. He was lead to research about God after his employer decided to have a vaccine mandate to all their employees but gave religious exemptions. After watching this documentary, my husband claimed religious exemption and in his letter to his employee, he declared that there is a God who gave him his immune system and is good enough to fight any virus. Thank God he got the religious exemption from getting the vaccine! Keep up the good fight Is Genesis History team and God bless! We've purchased the movie and have been sharing this movie with family and friends.
Humanity has worked a long time without divine help to rid ourselves of the worst diseases imaginable: polio, smallpox, measles, mumps, rubella, rsv, flu, diptheria, tetanus, and many more. I hope your husband doesn't have to learn by experience what humanity has had to learn. That being said, I have a deep and abiding hatred for anti vaxxers.
I am a geologist in Colorado. You can see the Great Unconformity here in several places. I remember, as a student at CU Boulder, all my professors clearly stated that no one knows why the Great Unconformity exists. It’s b/c they re viewing it from a secular worldview.
Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens. Jesus is a fictional allegory for the sun. Christianity is ancient astrology. It's just fables about the sun. Check out Acharya S aka D.M Murdock for more info. .. .. . .. ..
@@Gamefan86 behind me Satan! I researched it all and found the Truth. I won’t give you counterarguments because you won’t read them but continue searching the Truth and you will find it.
I know you will come back here someday and say you found Jesus. Because all that search for Truth sincerely will find it. Meanwhile I’m praying for you
@@JmenChristpas If you researched and still came up believing in god, then you didn't really research. Christianity stole everything it is from different religions. They weren't the first monotheist god, not the first resurrection, no the first to die, etc. Even stole pagan holidays to help get people to convert. Christmas, Halloween, and Easter. Actually research and learn. You researched nothing. Happy Saturnalia.
@@edgarmatzinger9742 I second that challenge. What exactly does not make sense. Cite the Biblical verses that you allege as nonsense and let us analyze them in their proper context.
@@davidhawkes1981 _"Cite the Biblical verses that you allege as nonsense"_ The verses about Jesus walking on water and turning it into wine. Just like those about to sell your raped daughter to her rapist. Or those on how to keep your slaves. And Genesis? Doesn't make any sense. And context? That's the way an apologist tries to make awkward things in the bible go away.
The Bible is nothing but lies. Every single thing in the Bible was written well after the supposed events took place. It was passed down orally, and we know that is accurate 😉🤣
@@cadon35 That's not something a creationist would predict. All Glires (Including rabbits) appear after the K/Pg boundary which is post-flood. Their ancestors, which were rodents, do exist in the strata of dinosaurs. This includes multituberculates, Protungulatum, Alphadon, Purgatorius, Kryptobaatar, etc. All these were the rodents that were related to the ones that got on the ark. After the flood, they spread out and repopulated the Earth's new ecological niches. Then they diversified into the many rodent/rabbit species we see today. Which later recessions of ice and sediment buried and fossilized in the ice age. So you're right, you technically don't see rabbits with dinosaurs. But you do see their ancestors together with the dinosaurs (many of which are identical to the rodents of today).
This host reminds me a lot of Mike Row...he is very attentive to each of the interviewees and contributes to the conversation in a meaningful way. Great documentary. Thank you❤
Nicholas, everyone in this film, including the host, is doctorate level educated. Which science are you referring to?…Everyone, including those scientists you choose to agree with, are giving opinions. They’re giving hypotheses. Carbon dating, at best, is highly inaccurate and unreliable. No one, including those scientists 200 years ago, was around to validate any claims. This representation, to me, has indeed met the standard to be given consideration.
@Nicholas Christie-Blick you aren't a good scientist you actually believe in fairy tales and lies, I'm sorry for your lack of faith, and also hate for Christianity and God, you must be a big sinner
@@rebsince71 Are all who claim to know God Holy and Righteous ? Does no one use religion for evil purpose ? If not , how would you discern their differences ?
I can't stress enough how bad of idea this is for Christians that wish to keep their kids involved in Christianity. Or just have them become scientifically literate. If kids are taught this set of demonstrably false facts, there is a high potential they'll eventually learn real science and do a 180 on their belief through a sense of betrayal. It's what happened to me and a few of my friends.
@@TTTristan1 My guess is that you have figured out a way to be comfortable with your sin and lay hold to "science" to buttress your position. A lot of stuff falls under the heading of "Christianity," much of it bad. A personal relationship with The True and Living Christ is quite another. It's the finished work of Jesus upon the cross, shedding His Life's Blood for the remission if sin, nothing more, nothing less, that opens up the pathway to true science.
@ This response feels pretty lackluster to atheists who went through the wringer on being taught what's sinful and desperately tried to avoid sin for all of their born again life. I don't believe sin exists. I don't believe anything supernatural exists. It's easy to want to assume that I didn't do my due diligence, that I wanted to sin, that I was misled, or that getting to the truth of the matter wasn't my goal, but I feel justified in my worldview. A worldview in which I've reviewed Christianity and creationism after believing whole-heartedly in it, and found it lacking integrity.
@@TTTristan1 Well, I would imagine there's a lot of things that seem lackluster to the atheist. After all, what's the point? If you tried to live the Christian life and failed, well, one hundred percent of those that attempt fail. You cannot apply the Christian life living in a fleshly body. You have to plug in to the source-The Holy Spirit empowering The Holy Scriptures. You cannot be saved until you realize that you are hopelessly lost. The center of power is in the middle of the cross. Trust and obey.
@@rickyblackburn-n9e I understood that at the time and was trying to do exactly as you explained. I felt I was lost, broken, and needed the one and true triune god to save and guide me. I did trust and obey. And it didn't complete me. I felt utterly miserable and I couldn't accept that a good god would require blind faith, because then any idea or religion could request the same and I would have no reason to deny blindly believing in it. I would be a hypocrite not to.
After reading many comments and having watched numerous high-level debates between Creationists and Evolutionists, it becomes abundantly clear that this is a "heart" issue more than a "head" issue.
@@immar1075 That's not entirely accurate. You have faith in the pilot every time you step onto an airplane, faith in a doctor every time they operate on you, faith in your teacher every time you uncritically accept what they are teaching you as true (evolution?). That's what faith is. Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that you are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can quantum pop into existence and create themselves at any moment? I don't have enough *faith* to believe in those very unscientific assertions my friend....
@@michael9237 " Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that you are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can quantum pop into existence and create themselves at any moment? I don't have enough faith to believe in those very unscientific assertions my friend...." Where did you ever get the idea that I believe any of which you spoke above. You assume much my friend....
He did say in Revelations that the knowledge of man would speed up in the latter days & that He would reveal Himself to those who didn't believe by that knowledge . What better way then proving Himself to be the creationist in the growth of proof that He is allowing our modern Scientists to embrace such as with Francis Collins Faith that God created it all & now attending Church as a Christian after decades of being an obnoxious atheist as he once was. .
@@billybob4274(sigh) Again with the “Blaming God for all the bad things in life” God is all good,nothing bad comes from him.Everything that is happening in this world is not God's work.
What a great fascinating, thought-provoking, eye-opening, and factual Documentary. HOW GREAT IS OUR GOD! UNMEASURABLE BEYOND HUMAN MIND. Please consider accepting my endless love and support here from the Philippines. Really really worth it to watch!. Consider my endless gratitude brothers and sisters out there! God Loves you beyond your own understanding.
very powerful and thank you to all who made this factual events come to life in the 20th century. Christianity Is The Beacon Of Light Love for GOD and Hope .
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 LOL. Atheist are religious, that's were the common sense comes in. Atheist have made "science" their religion of choice, not that it implies they're any smarter, just more arrogant. Science is God's creation, so it therefore makes known what is applied to our lives and in our lives. Christian's with this view have no problem with a young earth just as God describes in Genesis. That's what this video shows and it's why unbelievers gnash their teeth in anger. Don't like it, move on. We are steadfast.
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 The cool thing about the Bible is that it never says how old the universe is. Genesis just begins with, "Now the earth was formless and empty" so for all we know, the universe itself could actually be billions of years old. It also doesn't mention how long Adam and Eve were on the earth for before the fall into sin. The earth itself could also be billions of years old, since no animals would have died in a perfect world. And yes, it can be frustrating sometimes seeing Christians wander into an argument and get blasted because they don't correctly know how to defend their faith. I've seen Christians say terrible things and not act like they should (Im on ifunny, so that should explain a lot). That's the effect of sin in the world because nobody is perfect. My "philosophy" is just seeing other people as... well, people. We often get caught up in everything that we forget that a comment online was made by a real person with their own life and experiences. So if everyone is willing to see the other side from a different perspective, we could truly open our minds and find what the universal truth is. Well, that's my rant for today. Thanks for listening and not being rude. Have a good day ;)
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 Ayy no problem. That's awful to hear as well. These days I feel like "Christians" just use the title to make themselves feel superior. It's just depressing as the rest of us get a bad name. The way you spot a true Christian is the way they act. If they always act out of turn and force their religion on others, everything becomes a huge problem. True Christians try to act as we believe Jesus did - even loving our enemies, which seems impossible at times. Of course, that doesn't mean we don't make mistakes. Everyone is sinful... but all have been saved. Hats off to ya 🎩
@@maylingng4107 With respect, what's miraculous is that evolutionists literally believe that mass quantities of ordered and sequenced instructions (DNA) can come into existence out of non-information without an intelligent source in contrast to every other observable instance of information in existence which always has an intelligent source . It's sad that when they run into a problem like young comets that don't fit in their billions of years atheistic religion (evolution, Big Bang, etc.), they are willing to fabricate entire celestial objects like Oort clouds without a shred of observable evidence . When we find young soft tissues in dinosaur fossils, or young C-14 inside of diamonds, coal deposits all across the US, and in fossils from every geologic layer, evolutionists just reject it and twist the evidence to fit their atheistic religious beliefs concerning our origins. Then when the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and other laws of physics contradict each other at the beginning of the universe (making it naturally impossible) they invoke infinite alternate universes... a supernatural solution that supersedes our observable laws of nature, and btw, *infinite alternate universes and realities mean that there is inevitably an alternate universe that is run by magical fairies and with T-Rex's driving tanks down the street... that means that this popular atheist theory requires atheists to concede that their beliefs include the possibilities of magical fairies and other absurd fictional ideas.* And all along the way, you literally believe that we are distantly related to a banana, among so many other problems.... and then they call it "science." Evolution - the internally inconsistent, existentially unviable atheistic religion with a history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, and which cannot explain basic things that it should be able to explain. These things are not a problem for a biblical worldview. I'm not sure you have any grounds to mock Christians May Ling Ng. "It is appointed for man to die once, then comes judgment" (Hebrews 9:27).
In the end almost every atheist will argue that there are thousands of universes and we happen to live in the one where life could exist the way it has and is now. So where exactly is the machine that's spitting out thousands of universes and where does it get the mass and energy to do so? People often criticize any religious belief strictly because they do not want to answer for anything and live as they see fit. Don't judge them for that show them love, hate and blood profits mankind nothing
@May Ling This isn't a question of evidence, it's a matter of competing worldviews over the exact same evidence. For example, please consider the following observations from your belief system (several of which you have personally championed here): The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias. GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.
@@michael9237 MICHAEL you are a absolute Menace to atheist in this comment section and I’ve read so meny of your comments, I’m a brother in Christ is there any way I could get in contact with you, Facebook ,snap chat email, phone number anything man, I’m very Shook by your intellect and I would like to talk to you farther brother
Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun throug the heavens.
Interesting and cool things. There would be no problem with much of what you are saying. It can be two things at the same time though. The bible is the best Book for society and tells us the most of our universe and salvation. It certainly is different than other religion since it is anti-works based salvation meaning that you can not earn your salvation by your own good works.
this is nonsense! who believes in these lies. these are melted buildings, stone and brick! compare it to Sodom and Gomorrah and you will see the difference or you won't!! no difference same forms! Ron Wyatt
It's amazing how God talks to us w/o us not even knowing it. I am a believer and yesterday, I had a question as to why there are a lot of different species of dogs and birds and how do they connect to GOd's creation. Today, this video got suggested. I watched it and my question is answered. Yay! What an amazing GOd we have.
@@christopherlastname7638 You do realize that ALL dog breads of today are descended from wolves... yes.? This was not a case of evolution, but of breeding to the point of a loss of information(narrower and narrower gene pools).... with absolutely no additions of genetic information, whatsoever, at all. Rather than merely parroting what you've been programmed with ~mere theories~ try to engage that grey matter between your ears a wee bit. There has NEVER been one credible transition fossil, specifically showing the evolution from one "kind" to another. They have all been proven fallacious, hoaxes designed to brainwash, but were successful only in their own "debunking" upon closer study... be it through dna testing or exposure by another researcher. Evolution, as is propagated today, does not exist my friend.
@@michaeljameson6468 Evolution teaches that one species branched out an became others....which a species' genome makes impossible. Evolution also teaches that all living things came from a rock or even nothing.
@@christopherlastname7638 micro evolution or natural selection is not in doubt...evolution teaches that on species can become another...a dog can become a cat given enough time...evolution is a fairy tale at DNA put the lie to.
@@mamamarianovits9029 the fossil called "Lucy" it's a great example of a transitional fossil. But what does it matter to you? You have decided what you believe, so you will ignore any evidence to the contrary. ....but you are naive and immature enough to suggest other people "use their grey matter." I can tall you that I have used mine. All of the physical world I see around me tells me that a supernatural being creating everything around us makes no sense to me. I find the amazing story of the changes in our physical world to be much more interesting. I don't resent people who disagree. They should believe what they like.
I came across this channel and I am glad I watched it fully it was a mystery of time. God is great and did not give us all the wisdom he have, that leaves us a mistery to think. Praise God almighty who created heaven and earth.
Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun throug the heavens.
@@Gamefan86 Interesting... reminds me of when the the True God's 10 plagues insulted ancient Egypt's many gods,at least one was proved powerless with every plague God brought against Egypt. I've never thought of Jesus's actions insulting the pagan sungod worship,which was so prolific among the pagans, with his miracles as well. Thank you for this information.
Hi Cindy, If you ever have the opportunity to watch this on a laptop (even a small one), many scenes are quite visual, like the scenes of the Grand Canyon & others. I watched from an older iPad that my son gave me for Christmas 4 yrs ago. May God richly bless you & your loved ones.
To anyone interested, “THE ARK & THE DARKNESS,” a NEW BIBLICALLY BASED MOVIE being released for 2 days only, will be shown in theaters on March 20th & 21st, 2024 (DATES MAY BE DIFFERENT) depending on your location.
I too suppressed between my spiritual experiences and what appeared as lapses in scripture yet having faith that God is true. Then I began to learn of these truths in an apologetics class. It is the calming balm in these days of uncertainty. For there is one certainty - God is.
@Jimbo Bell We collectively are God my friend. We are the only creatures on earth that can combine information into formulating new ideas. We also have the ability to heal ourselves and have supernatural abilities just like "Ice Man".
Here is another piece of evidence that I hope you find useful, from one Christian to another: Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there? For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.
I know my experience is only anecdotal but I once watched a very strong flash flood cut away a swath of earth at least 20 feet deep and a half mile long of what had previously been solid rock. Rushing water is incredibly strong and once rocks get mixed with it, even solid granite rock walls are ripped away by the force. This happened in New Mexico during the summer monsoons late 1980's. It all happened in about a half hour. I remember walking out into the gorge it left. The landscape was completely changed - gone in fact. It was a place where my young wife and I often walked our dog and I also remember joking with my wife that I wonder if this how the grand canyon was formed and we laughed and said maybe it took only a couple of years and not billions. I actually think the instantaneous force of water is a more credible explanation for the Grand Canyon then the slow erosion of billions of years.
Have you ever BEEN to the Grand Canyon!!! It is NOT composed of unconsolidated till like shown in this video. The rocks (ROCKS not soil!) are different layers of differing hardness and types that contain embedded fossils that can be seen to be of a specific type in each layer. There are several places where the planes of the sedimentary rock are tilted to extreme angles as well. NOT the result of a quick outflow of debris material but rather a slow sedimentation process that shows that different types of material were laid down at different times. ALSO the bottom of the canyon cuts through many hundreds of feet of very hard IGNEOUS rock! Rock that was molten and then solidified underground. This guy's equating of his little stream and erosion gully to the Grand Canyon is completely ludicrous! Rather than finding someone who supports your pre-conceived ideas and conclusion, why don't you look at the actual evidence first! Understand the parameters that must have existed before the Grand Canyon could have been cut and then get a real and actual conclusion. You obviously have no background in soil geology, rock geology, hydraulic physics, paleontology, geomorphology or any credible science discipline. Grand Canyon's rough dimensions: 1 mile deep, 10 miles wide, 100 miles long. Through SOLID ROCK!
@ megaterang- least 20 feet deep and a half mile long. Multiple that by 10,000 feet at least. Open mindedness. Global not county. Watch the video. If you did you closed your hearing!
megaterang yeah, a global flood! Duh! It only makes sense. I’ve thought about this for a long time. It’s actually annoying how dumb smart people can be. Forgive them God. Strengthen us to love them!
Ross Rosco , you wrote, "Hundreds of Creationist scientists have changed their minds. None of the millions of other scientists have. Why would that be ?????" None? You must live in a cave. I believed in evolution until I was in my 60's. An examination of the geologic column converted me. There is no way those thick, homogeneous, uneroded, unbioturbated sedimentary rock layers were gradually deposited. A global flood is the only thing that makes scientific sense. Dan
“Time is not a magic wand that solves all the geologic problems of the world!” Well I’m definitely using that statement in the future. Love this video. Thank you.
I am amazed at how often Luke 19:40 is shown here. It is woven throughout. While humans in general and certain Christians remain silent, the rocks are declaring the Glory of God.
@@patrickvanbaal2837 That's because you put your Faith in the modern mythology that puddles can turn themselves into people if you wait a real long time, fish evolve into philosophers, and entire mathematically ordered universes can pop themselves into existence at any moment... we just don't have enough faith to believe in that. For all your anti-God assertions, you sure do suspiciously live perfectly in line with everything He said about you. See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals? On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed. This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview. You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15) "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)
In talking with the wife of a geologist: She said he studied the Grand Canyon, & floated the river; concluding it had to have formed underwater (submarine).
Interesting. That complies with the conclusions presented here as well of large water-borne depositions and the bit about the underwater sand dunes locked in the upper limestone layer.
I love this video. I watched it about a year ago, and I rewatched it today. I think I’ll be watching it again and again, because there is so much information here. My kids are all interested in science - they each have a personal favorite - and they have asked me several questions about how different scientific principles seem to disprove our faith. This video answers their questions. It also shows them that Christianity and science aren’t mutually exclusive. Hearing marine biologists, geologists, paleontologists and astronomers explain how their fields of expertise prove Creation has helped me reconcile my family’s devout faith with our love of science. Thank you so much for this video, it is truly a gift. And, of course, Thank God for making this video possible!! To Him go the Glory!!
I applaud you for not giving in to the scientifically ludicrous mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that puddles can literally turn themselves into people if you just wait a really really long time, and that "nothing created everything accidentally." Unfortunately you fell into the militant atheist troll trap on this page... but amen sister. Look up GotQuestions if you need answers to hard Bible questions. Your kids are not "meaningless evolved protoplasm" in a meaningless chemical universe that doesn't care about you - they are valuable human beings made in the image of God. *"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"* (Romans 3:23) *"The wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord"* (Romans 6:23) *"It is appointed for man to die once, then comes Judgment"* (Hebrews 9:27)
@@michael9237 Mikey will actually try to encourage you to lie to your kids. The "science" on this video is nonsense. Your kids might start by being fooled, but when they eventually learn actual science, and the actual scientific method, then this fetid BS will necessarily fall by the wayside. Then you will need to deal with the fact that your kids will regard all that you "explained" to them as nonsense. That's a normal parent thing- so no worries. But the fact that they will likely turn away from God because the limited and nonsensical version preached here- well that will be a sad thing indeed.
I just don't have enough faith to believe that fish evolve into philosophers and that puddles can turn themselves into people if you just wait a really long time. Here's an observation/question: 1-) DNA contains mass quantities of ordered, sequenced, encoded information that "tells" your body how to grow, including instructions for your eye. 2-) Every single observable instance of information in existence always has an intelligent source (the words on this screen, in a book, programming in your computer, etc.) Conclusion) Therefore, consistently interpreted, the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source (a Creator - God). How do you handle this observable evidence? Do you: A) Consistently interpret this evidence - the information in DNA had an intelligent source like the rest of the observable evidence. B) Inconsistently interpret the evidence - information in DNA Unscientifically must be the exception to all the rest of the observable evidence. Information created itself from non-information just that one time. C) Deny that it's information, it's just chemicals - chemicals just fizz into your eye's concave light-refracting lens, 137M light sensitive cells, 40M nerve endings, and precise muscles that auto-focus this complex optical system 100,000 times a day. D) Ignore the evidence, say "well science just doesn't know yet," insist on an Atheistic/Naturalistic explanation. *Wouldn't it be more scientifically consistent to interpret the information in DNA as also having an Intelligent Source, like all the rest of the observable evidence...?* Your answer speaks volumes about your scientific/unscientific worldview assumptions/biases.
@@GreatDaneAV Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance if you just wait a long enough *time,* and that planets can randomly clump together to meet 122 precise anthropic constants (conditions required for life) - a 1 in 10^138 probability - from a "Big Bang" by chance? Science is a methodology. What you're talking about is an Ideology, and I just don't have enough faith to believe that these unscientific beliefs happened by chance, never mind the many scientific problems with them. *"The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse"* (Romans 1:20)
I Thank YOU All" SO Much", For That Christian program Of (GENESIS History"!). The only Things). They didn't talk about Was THE Many "Earthquakes". Of "THAT'S HAPPENED"😳." THROUGHOUT The Many HUNDREDS OF YEARS".
That's literally what christians do with science. They have a narrative paradigm established by the bible and their faith and then cherry pick evidence to support their claims and ignore the evidence that refutes them. I work with a seventh day Adventist that believes in "biblical science" and we get into arguments all the time that end with him throwing up his hands saying "That's what i believe and nothing will change it!". That is the complete opposite of the scientific method
@@nicholaseaves2591 Mr. eaves, that's literally what atheists do with science as well. It's a matter of competing worldview interpretations over the exact same evidence, the difference is that atheistic-Naturalism is demonstrably internally inconsistent, it has an embarrassing history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, it can't explain foundational things that it ought to be able to explain, and it is not existentially viable (ie. you can't live it out in reality). We already discussed how atheistic-Naturalists believe in Supernatural phenomena (and you tried to say that pre-existence is "natural" - God is pre-existent)... you know, for all your anti-God assertions, you sure do suspiciously live perfectly in line with everything He said about you. See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals? On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed. This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview. You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15) "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)
it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because ... science.
@@michael9237 the religious answer has no explanatory mechanism. Intelligent design can't be tested. It's not even close to comparable with scientific theory
@@michael9237 btw, im not going to reply to all the assertions in your novel of a comment. Try to be more concise. This is a youtube comment thread. Not a college dissertation
@@Paul-hl8yg There are missing links. This video states changes via evolution, but only changes within a species. The thing I'm confused by is the Earth being 6000 years old when ancient trees exist that have rings showing 20,000 years. So Bible says 6000 years yet there is clear proof of 20,000 years at the very least. I know carbon 14 dating is a mess for dates beyond 20,000 years.
@@martinwoodworth3715 Creationism is false, utterly & completely false! .. The Earth is millions of years old, the sun older than the Earth & the Universe 13.7 billion years old. All these are facts, that have been studied. The data that makes these figures, come from many sources. Evolution is completely true & again, many sciences all come together for this. The whale, for instance.. We have found fossil evidence that they once walked on land. We have found transitional fossils, creatures that once lived & were ancestors of the whales. Whales are mammals, they breath air, like all mammals. Even their tail bones show, that they once walked, not swam! All fish have gills & do not breath air like mammals. Fish tails always go from side to side. Yet all the mammals in the seas, their tales go up & down. The bones in those aquatic mammal, show ankles, knees etc, that have elongated & changed for swimming. There are microscopic creatures living on our eyelashes, which clean them. They eat the debris on the lashes. Since the invention of mascara, these creatures have evolved. Everytime someone uses mascara, the creatures start to die off. However before they do, the last eggs laid, hatch with their digestive systems changed, to only eat mascara! Then, when the person stops using mascara, the same happens again, but the creatures have adapted their digestive system, to only eat the normal debris again. This is evolution in action, a creature adapting to its environment physically, for existence. There is no proof or verifiable evidence for any of the worlds deities, none, zero! Yet an abundance of data, proof & verified evidence for the old Earth & for Evolution!
@@Paul-hl8yg If carbon 14 dating can't be trusted beyond 20,000 years I want to know how they date rocks to be 4.5 billion years. I'm very open minded & not a Christian. I am spiritual & love science. Science is our ability to understand our surroundings. Bible talks of beings living 800 years, these were aliens. They messed with our dna theory is very interesting theory too.
@@martinwoodworth3715 Also, always always remember.. Anything that claims to be a "god", is not worthy of that title! And, if such a great being actually existed, surely it couldn't just exist? Surely 'it' had to have a beginning? Surely 'it' had a parent/s or species to belong to itself? Firstly Man invented gods, then they decided there must only be 'one'. Why? The Pharaoh Akhanaten was the first in recorded history to claim, there was only One (the Aten) & the word spread. Then people, later to become "Jews", carried that forth, making their own religion, with their own "one god". Plagiarism is rife within religion!
I profoundly hope that we could have Chinese translation (and other languages) of these documentaries. My IELTS 6.5 still hasn't enabled me to fully understand the content, but I'm really interested and I pause so frequently to make sure I understand every idea.
The amount of evidence revealed in this well-made documentary is shocking and revolutionary. If one watches this objectively, one cannot but conclude that some of the currently accepted theories of the origin of life, the flood, and other subjects are severely distorted and based on incomplete evidence and/or are influenced through false presuppositions. This explains thoroughly and offers a more sound understanding of the treated subjects. Well done and glory to God!
" in this well-made documentary is shocking and revolutionary" I disagree I watched a couple of sections and groaned at the rubbish. Like the part were they say that "you have to look at the text" about the Bible then they lie about what the Bible says about genealogy of Joseph. So a challenge pick any section of this post it here and we will look at this evidence together.
@@alphatav3733 Are you presupposing that all acts of creation require a thinking being some how? Where did you get that from? A volcano explodes creating a hole and new landscape do you think that means the volcano is an intentional being?
DD DDD so you presuppose that there isn't a Creator because you don't believe something is created? I see a building, a assume there was an architect and builder. That is my point. You believe that nothing created/formed/made/produced everything. That is also a presupposition, but it is disingenuous. The truth is that people don't want to believe in a God, because then we would be held morally accountable for all the sin in our life. Atheism allows us to make god in our image. Therefore nothing is wrong and there is no reason to argue about it. Why would you argue about something when there is no ultimate meaning to it?
@@profphilbell2075 it's called faith and reasoning. I don't have to see something to know it exists or it's true. I've seen more in my life than anyone would understand and it's all God.
“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools,” (Rom. 1:20-22 NKJV)
@@bluenose7984 He never told nobody, you mast warship Him. Who you love , you warship too. But one rebel love only himself and nobody ellse. This person is really egoistic . By the way ,do you love your parents ?
Dr. Robert Carter is incredibly moving in this series. His wisdom and faith blows me away. This series lead me to Dr. Stephen Meyers too. These two scientists supercharge my Faith.
Gods intelligence is beyond comprehension. He created all this for our enjoyment. We sinned against him and then in the richness of his grace came to earth to die for us. 1 Corinthians 2:9. What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man imagined, what God has prepared for those who love him” Wow just wow.
@@maylingng4107 With respect, your argument ignores God's Omniscient character. God knew all of this would happen from the beginning, and He prophesied Jesus' coming right off the bat in Genesis 3:15. The bad things that happen are a result of allowing free will. God created everything good (Genesis 1:31), but then Adam and Eve decided to rebel against God, seek to "be like God," and follow Satan (Genesis 3:5) and trust in a lie rather than their Creator. You still see this kind of behavior today. I don't have enough faith to believe that fish evolve into philosophers, you are cousin to a banana, and entire universes can pop into existence at any moment. "They perish because they *refused to love the truth* and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a *powerful delusion* so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who *have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness* ." (2 Thessalonians 2:10-12)
God created all of the problems you see on earth when he cast Satan down to the earth alone with all of his followers and still to this day he / she hasn't been able to clean that mess up. There is no question about who's running the earth 😀
@@analyst1777 The problem is that Adam and Eve made a free will choice to rebel against God, follow Satan, and trust in a lie, and it is through their sin that our nature became corrupt. What do you mean God "hasn't been able to clean that mess up" - He is in control and you can't do anything unless He allows you to (Genesis 3:5). If God is Holy and Just then He has to punish sin, and He will... but the reason He allows evil to continue to exist in the world temporarily is because you are evil, and He delayed Judgment Day to give you a chance to repent. You are very fortunate. "But God is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish, but for all to reach repentance" (2 Peter 3:9).
@@michael9237 If you erased satan from the Genesis story there isn't any logical reason to believe mankind would have ever fell. There would be no lie and they would have never even known evil. The book of Enoch even teaches what fallen evils fallen angels taught mankind I will agree with you somewhat he is in control in the sense that Satan has to get permission to convince people to rape, murder, cause war, sickness and destroy the Earth from God just like in the story of Job.
@@analyst1777 Not every act of evil originates from Satan nor the fallen angelic host. Evil also originates from the free will of those who choose to do wickedly, e.g. not every murder originates from Satan as people can freely choose to murder from their own impulses.. The importance of the Millennial Reign of Christ in the present creation at the end of the age is a necessity for in that time (era) Christ will reign supreme over fallen and redeemed humans while Satan and the fallen host are bound. At the end of the reign Satan will be unbound and there will still be those who choose of their free will driven by their desires in opposition to Christ to follow Satan thus negating the Devil made me do it (I am a product of my environment) mentality which seeks to place the blame elsewhere but upon one's self.
You must check out Brian Nickels Hydroplate theory here on UA-cam. It's an amazing look at the evidence from a scientific approach. It's a 6 part vid you can't miss it.
Notice something! Exhaustive observations? Ohhhh science? " Hebrew. "My expert has, after all his experiences and observations and explanations deep thoughts that influenced his mind. The wow factor that is the science. Thankyou Lord for the wow factor and ability to be after so many years to be impressed anew.
Thankyou Lord for my friend Noel Weeks who went through so much to have the privilege to study Hebrew ancient and modern. That over his life felt the need to write down despite all opposition and You Lord made his zeal possible I'm very late in appreciation for his efforts because he's long buried and in that place prepared for him to wait for You Lord. Thankyou Lord for Life and the wow factor I experience daily.
Wow! Like a glass of cold water on a hot day, this documentary is really refreshing in this world that's progressively turning against God and becoming so spiritually lost and losing its grip on reality. Very professional, good production that's not stale or monotone, challenging the naturalist and evolutionist worldview, and providing feasible evidence supported in every field of science from geology, microbiology, paleontology, biology, etc. Great work!! ❤👍🏾
I agree, I just watched it with my husband. Wow..it leaves us speechless for now. We are even more impressed by the countless puzzle pieces that fit into each other so perfectly🥲. (Blessings from The Netherlands)
Had me believing them millions of years in school and after but now at 66 years young I believe in six day creation and the great flood! Praise God he opened my eyes to the truth just like he said! Seek and you will find!
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 HaHaHa you are a funny person! You have been decieved just like I was and talking dillusional! God created it in six literal days in bc time we now live in ad time in a matter of about 7000 years old and Jesus will return soon to prove it as we are in the days of Noah!
I came across this documentary a few years back and wished that I had recorded it. Now is back and I am doing just that, for future reference. Thanks for uploading it again.
@@javiermgtaoism5702 What is the software, stuff like this is invaluable, but I have a lot of gray hair so it has to be relatively simple, thanks in advance.
@@robertashcraft1360 I am not an advertiser and hope it will not be interpreted as spam. The software is called 'Wondershare Uniconverter'. It costs about 39 US dollars for a years subscription. I have downloaded hundreds of videos and movies with it.
FYI, not all scientists believe in that crap. CRAP =evoloution. Im a Herpetologist, even. For crying out loud, I would never let the world know I was a "Biologists " and use Evoloution in the same sentence. Biologists should know more than everyone, its impossible, given the complexity of the human anatomy. Go check out Kent Hovind on youtube.
@@sidirmusic she may have bought her PHD from Darwin the Mr Apes universe. And she may ended to become Apes by evolution that never stop🤭 (if keep studying skull with brains of Apes)
Helen, here is another piece of evidence that corroborates Genesis, and I hope you find it of interest: Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there? For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. *The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood.* If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.
@@michael9237 Wow!! I didn’t know any of those details. I am a card carrying Christian would you email that to me? I’ll send it when you respond back just don’t want to have my email out there.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 You sir have over a thousand posts on this channel. Seems to me that you are on a mission. What else do you do during the day other than hate God for creating you??
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 I left you a longer comment and question on another post but quickly as a Scientist how then does soft tissue last for millions and of years in Dinosaur bones in the wild in extreme conditions?
Sir, that's your religious literalist beliefs. Not based in history or science. I'm fine with you having beliefs, but there is literally zero evidence for a six day creation nor Noah's ark and the flood, but there's evidence against these stacking all the way to the moon and back.
Hubby and I are Seventh-day Adventists, wanted to watch a good Creation video, and found this. MANY thanks for such an organized and stunningly beautiful presentation.
I did as well‼️I’m a born again believer & have watched a UA-cam channel called “Hope Through Prophecy,” which is basically 7th Day Adventist, & have learned a great deal. After reading through quite a few mostly negative comments posted here, l was immediately uplifted when l got to yours & read it❗️l found this video well-presented & very enjoyable. CHECK THIS OUT ➡️ UA-cam has an official trailer for the new Biblically based movie called “THE ARK & THE DARKNESS,” being released 3/20&21/2024 & shown in select theaters around the country (dates may vary, depending on your location). May God richly bless you & your husband‼️
Me too. It is a pity the presenters don't understand that the Universe is much older than the surface of this earth. The comment in day 4 is an aside (He made the stars also). It does not state that the stars were spoken into existence on Day 4 of the creation week.
A major flood just ravaged Europe. This is also a scare tactic, and eagerly awaiting a glorious conflagration to overtake the world and bring on the ruination of civilization isn't moral - it's wicked.
Amd Yellowstone has been having higher then normal earthquakes lately and the magma has been rising. I wouldn't b surprised if it erupted soon. Also Germany and the area of rhe Rhine River is flooded. We r in some interesting times. Get right with God
Joel: 2: 28-32 A POURING OUT OF GOD'S SPIRIT. And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: And also upon the servants and upon the handmaids in those days will i pour out my spirit. And i will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood and fire and pillars of smoke. The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the Lord come. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be delivered: This life isn't all there is, Heaven and Hell are very real. If you will confess your sins to Jesus Christ with a genuine heart and ask him to save you, he will save you and he will show you that he is real. Don't leave it to late. Once you take your last breath it's a done deal. God Bless
Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens. Jesus is a fictional allegory for the sun. Christianity is ancient astrology. It's just fables about the sun. Check out Acharya S aka D.M Murdock for more info. .. .. .
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 so, Alessandro cites two ideas that challenge the "evolution myth", and you immediately misrepresent his argument to say that he meant to use these ideas to support "Young Earth Creationism". you are disingenuous, a deceiver and an over-educated fool who wastes time responding to people to whom he supposes to condescend. if, indeed, you are well educated why not concisely explain why evolution is not a "myth"? you know, how it is that evolution is not a traditional story, concerning early history or explaining some natural phenomenon, involving supernatural beings or events?
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 so to be clear here's what i believe: i believe you are a poor logician and a disingenuous arguer. incapable of responding to direct questions, you posit suppositions regarding those whose logic and inquiry you are ill-prepared to answer. in short, you are an internet troll according to the current vernacular. my "place to begin" is right here. rather than pontificating about your puesdo-scientific dogma and citing irrelevant gov't support for your dogma, why don't you address my original question. define "evolution" as you wish to consider it here, and then explain how it is not a "myth" as i have defined it previously.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Nicholas!! My favourite grandson's name. Having said that, I do agree with you and your knowledge. It fascinates me right from the earliest beginnings of earth. Through no fault of mine, I was raised in a religious cult. I was rebellious and disagreeable. Something inside of me as a youth said, " It ain't necessarily so." Pardon the grammar. Long story shortened, my family, Mother, Father and 5 siblings were thrown out of the cult with a box of food and nowhere to live. Godly people doing godly cleansing????? Now I am almost 80 years old ☺️. I aknowledge parts of the Bible in it's historical information. But........ Way off hundreds of thousands of years in many other respects. The guy with the navy blue sweater and blue jeans is talking TWADDLE. Where is his proof? No offense.
Everything old is new again... amazing how science of old can be explained to be a newer occurrence by the explanation of layers of earth being formed by water, heat and cooling with the water subsiding, retreating, and not taking an extreme amount of time such as millions or more of years to do so in a miniscule amount of time compared to that being anywhere from a mere generation to just a few generations. Incredible!
There is no evidence of a great flood that covered the entire world. The entire world of a small group of people in a localized area, sure. There is NO evidence that it was just a generation to a few generations. ALL evidence points to millions and billions of years. I want to see the erosion that created the Grand Canyon happen in just a few generations. It cannot, and did not.
I agree. We are all *Uncritically Indoctrinated* into an Atheistic-Naturalist worldview (abiogenesis, particles to man evolution, etc.), but praise God that some are still capable of critical thinking and can see beyond the indoctrination. Science is a methodology. Atheistic-Naturalism is an Ideology. Science and Naturalism are not the same thing. This is a matter of competing worldviews over the same evidence and you have to evaluate the worldviews to determine which one more rationally handles the evidence. For example, *did you know that atheistic-Naturalists unavoidably have to invoke Supernatural phenomena in order to "naturally" (atheistically) explain our universe, most of them just aren't aware of it?* The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent, and *all of the best evidences of evolution can also be explained by Genesis 1-12.* And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just don't know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias.
Those things I pointed out are not "science" (a methodology) - they are part of the Atheistic-Naturalist worldview (an ideology)... it's a religion. *Did you know that the Theory of Evolution (and atheistic-Naturalism in general) shares characteristics of a religion?* Not just saying that, it's a fact. In Arkansas, a 1982 federal court ruled that Creationism can't be taught in schools because "it is not falsifiable." With its history of rewriting itself every time we discover a new problem with it, what would it take to "falsify" evolution today? Maybe hundreds of Living fossils? Or allegedly millions of year extinct creatures still alive today? Finding fully developed vertebrates in the Cambrian explosion? Discovering that numerous vestigial (leftover) organs actually have a normal purpose, like the appendix? Finding an alleged 70 million year extinct evolutionary predecessor to land-dwelling mammals still alive today with no signs of evolution (the Coelacanth)? Young soft tissues in a growing number of dinosaur fossils that appear similar to 4000 year old mummies and the Tyrolean ice man? *Did you know that secular scientists recently debunked evolutionist claims of "junk DNA"?* Or should we just reinterpret all of these problematic evidences *in order to sustain the Atheistic-Naturalist belief in abiogenesis and evolution?* Is this really how "science" (a methodology) is supposed to work, or is this more about your agenda of attempting to explain our origins without God? In contrast to modern evolutionists, Charles Darwin met the gold standard of modern science and gave a testable hypothesis for the validity of his theory, saying "if an *organ* were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down..." and he didn't have access to the fields of genetics or microbiology when he made up his theory. *If evolution is true, then how did male and female evolve?* Now be careful, the usual evolutionist rescuing devices of "algae," "asexual organisms," "alleles," and "populations" just don't answer the question here - you have to explain the critical *organs* in these separate, yet interdependent, precision tuned "all or nothing" biological systems "by numerous, successive, slight modifications." Going backwards in the evolutionary narrative, which of these critical organs do you gradually reduce first? And if they did evolve "by numerous, successive, slight modifications" then which gender evolved first and how did it reproduce while the other hadn't evolved yet? *"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"* (Romans 3:23) *"The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them."* (Romans 1:18-19)
Definition of Science: "the intellectual and practical *activity encompassing the systematic study* of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through *observation and experiment."* [ie. a methodology] Definition of Naturalism: "the *philosophical belief that everything arises from natural properties and causes,* and *supernatural or spiritual explanations are excluded* or discounted." Science and Naturalism are demonstrably not the same thing. You are erroneously conflating the two. QED Indeed.
Really appreciated that the presenter posed 'mainstream' challenges to the presenters..and they explained their positions... If the corona virus has taught me anything... is that keeping an ear out for what others are saying and investigating it is the best course of action. Superbly presented show. High quality. Succinct. Appreciated
@@bartbannister394 I would be very interested in reading any book you could recommend considering the discrepancies in age of these dating methods which I found to be a perplexing issue as I continue to investigate. Thanks!
Thank you so very much. this movie has answered so many questions, and confirmed what I believe through the bible . What amazes me is that the Holy Spirit reveals lots of information to us who are not scientists, and now we have documented evidence. God bless you all.
Anyone sucked in by this please talk to a sane scientist, or to aa psychologist or even a friend. It is a classic example of pseudo science which is unattached to reality. They are like early people who believed in a flat earth. This time it is a ‘young earth’, my god,no explanation of the neanderthal man moving to homo sapiens, and from hunters and gatherers to agricultural which is all so well documented by scientists all over the world. Please believe in religion and God in your own sense but please do not believe these backyard American scientists. Please recall that it is only Americans that have a problem with evolution.
@VideoAudioDisco09 The rape story is not an endorsement of it just a historical story, details matter. Spontaneous generation of life has zero evidence, Its just a neurotic fantasy to avoid feeling guilty.
@VideoAudioDisco09 There is no natural explanation, that's the problem, it requires outside intervention with power and inteligence. Atheism is not rational.
@VideoAudioDisco09 All the experiments you mentioned disproving spontaneous generation prove it cant work back in the day. Proof of a god or gods existing is simple, Creation exists therefore it was created. The complexity of an ecosystem accidentally occurring is beyond belief. Now you can believe in that if you dont try and pretend your using science and rationality. Atheists in my own town put up a billboard claming to be supported by science. That's the selling point if the system. This movie gives a rational system but one I reject based on the time factor, it needs refutation not moronic mockery.
Lot of trolls telling us there is not God and it is not a creation and they say the Bible is all lies,, well they will find out in the end.. And they are still trying to say we are living on a spinning ball.. But how would you measure sea level on a round ball,, get out a globe and figure out where the high pint is on it,,, where is sea level..?
@@nicholaschristie-blick4516 did you watch the documentary? Saying something isn't true doesn't make it not true. Perhaps the notion of a God bothers you?
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 baffling you refuse to be informed. I'm willing to bet none of you even watched this documentary halfway through yet eager to attack those that did. Perhaps you are trolls that need to be off and watching your favorite Dawkins video?
Question #4 If it is true that the sedimentary layers which contain the fossils were formed in “minutes or even seconds” wouldn’t if follow that every species of living organisms which lived in that day be in all the layers and not confined to one or maybe two of them?
They are found everywhere. If you’re asking why every organism isn’t in every single burial site that’s because every organism didn’t live in every square mile of the planet. Ecosystem destruction, remember
Which god? Gods were invented before modern communications exist ed. Someone showed up with a fantastical story and there was no way to disprove it. Pastor: a profession that will keep the rent paid and food on the table. It helps if you're a great story teller. Have you ever seen anybody rise from the dead? Cure the blind? Do you know anybody who has?
@@Keving3 Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *Time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people?
@@Keving3 I appreciate your honesty. Let me ask you something your belief system: *What are your thoughts on the Faint Young Sun Paradox?* Scientists observe that our sun is slowly warming up as hydrogen fuses into helium, and at this observed rate, 3.5B years ago our sun would have been 30% fainter and earth would have been frozen solid as a result (if it was really billions of years old). The problem is that atheistic-evolutionists believe that 3.5B years ago chemicals fizzed by chance in a puddle to form all the necessary proteins required for life - in what would have been a global, dead, frozen environment - hence the "paradox." *How do you handle this observable evidence?* *"Liquid water is generally considered a key ingredient for life. When the Sun was much fainter, the Earth with its present atmospheric composition would have been frozen solid. If the oceans were frozen, life may not have formed" (Quote: NASA).* A) Biblical Creation proponents happily accept this measurable scientific evidence - it's not a "paradox" at all because the earth isn't billions of years old, and life didn't create itself by chance from a puddle of chemicals, we were intentionally created. This makes sense because there is zero evidence that our earth was ever frozen solid as it should have been if it was really billions of years old, and also zero evidence of an early greenhouse gas atmosphere or other atheistic miracle warming effect to help sustain the atheistic belief in abiogenesis. B) Atheistic-Naturalists (evolutionists, etc.) however have a problem, because you need billions of years of deep time to make it seem less implausible that chemicals can fizz into people, and that life atheistically created itself. So you have to invoke some kind of a miracle warming effect with no evidence like an early alleged greenhouse gas atmosphere, or various implausible celestial phenomena. Not only do these excuses have zero evidence, but they are also incredibly implausible - because if you did have an early greenhouse gas atmosphere 3.5B years ago, you have to believe that it countered the faint young sun's temperature just right (not too hot like Venus, yet not cold like Mars) and it had to dissipate in perfect inverse proportion to the gradual warming of the sun over time - *all just to make atheistic abiogenesis and early evolution seem less scientifically problematic.* Two worldviews, same evidences, two very different interpretations. Which one is being more "scientific," the one that just accepts the evidence, or the one that has to fabricate implausible and evidence-less excuses to *circumvent this problematic scientific evidence and sustain their already scientifically-problematic belief that puddles can fizz into people?* Any thoughts? *"The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse"* (Romans 1:20)
Excellent work.... That only scratches the surface of the complexity of the true God's creation - Each topic covered could be another documentary of equal or greater length. That's part of the awesome nature of God's creation - it takes more than a lifetime to fully grasp each topic. This is where faith comes into play. I greatly credit the producer for utilizing practicing expert testimony to solidify God's word. Pick the topic(s) that most stimulate you and seek the truth and it will be revealed to you - that is what I myself have found through my own research to the point that I myself no longer question the word but now truly marvel at it.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 You can trash the billions of years as most dating methods gives a young world. Helium in atmosphere, Helium in ground, Meteor dust, Buildup of carbon 14, Human population, Natural plutonium, Sodium in sea, Sediment in sea, Erosion of continents, Earth's magnetic field, Oil leaks in earth, Natural gas in earth, Orphan radiohalos, Decay of rock magnetism, Tight bends in rocks, Coral reef growth, Oldest living plants, Human civilizations, River delta growth, Undersea oil seepage, Uranium in sea, Rotation of spiral galaxies, Decay of comets, Dust on the moon, Slowing of earth's rotation, Heat loss from earth, Niagara Falls erosion and many more Go ahead and try to refute any of these.
Thank you so much for the kind words, @toddashley407! We are actually in the final stages of producing a follow-up film to this one called 𝘔𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘈𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥, which will soon be available for pre-order. By signing up at this link, you will receive an email notification you as soon as the pre-order goes live: mailchi.mp/isgenesishistory.com/pre-order
I only commenting here because my space is blocked. We are not the center of the universe we are no the only species of humanoids to have existed. We are not the only planet that has total eclipses. Every thing that was created was by mutation from cells of reproductions restoring the earth to its former glory. Humans came from another planet and we were an interplanetary species. God exists today, but we are all our own creators of our own destiny. That is where free will came to be. Although some people need to be encouraged for overcoming challenges 1:23:25
Wishing everyone who marks this day, a very Blessed Good Friday. A day where Christians around the word commemorate the ultimate sacrifice, so that amid despair and despondency, hope and forgiveness may be found.
Ah yes, when Jesus tell his disciples (Mark 7,1-15) that it isn't necessary to wash hands or utensils before eating, he either wasn't aware of the creatures he created called microbes that cause disease or he had a plan that includes many people dying in horrific ways! What a merciful savior!?
@tsimahei Jesus spoke of hand washing as if it were unimportant. Unless you can site some passages wherein he tells his followers the necessity of hand washing for health, then he either really didn't know that dirty hands can spread disease, or didn't care.
@Oallcm Dsoner What "sacrifice"? "He" "sacrifices" "himself" to "himself" as a loop hole to forgive "himself" from "his" own mistakes and three days later "he" supposedly is alive again..... What "sacrifice" are you talking about?!?...
Wonderfully done! Gonna share this with a few friends. We LOVE the Grand Canyon and driving out west. You put everything into words I try explaining to my wife lol
August Dog ...you need to get out more, and maybe read a few books (other than the Bible) because your scientific outlook seems to be rather narrow and foreshortened. Jus’ sayin’.
@neverindoubt You weren't paying attention to the paleontologist, the biologist, the anthropologist with PhD degrees challenging the current paradigm... "Forever Learning but unable to come to a fuller knowledge of the truth" Bible 101
@@fredricthomas6654 “You weren't paying attention to the paleontologist, the biologist, the anthropologist with PhD degrees” They don't deserve to be paid attention to. Because they are wrong at best, And liars at worst, Liars working to line their own pockets and the pockets of the religious universities and religious organizations they work for. Because those are the ONLY palaces they can make a living abusing and misusing science. Real scientists reject anything these guys are espousing as impossible. Ted Kaczynski had a PHD in mathematics. Has any reputable mathematician ever quoted his works? “ challenging the current paradigm” Thats funny! Its better called “flying in the face of scientific facts”. They aren't challenging anything except sanity and reason. Even the Catholic church disagrees with them. Absolutely NO serious, reputable scientist supports young earth creationists beliefs, no matter how many PHDs they have been granted to misuse. Education without intelligence is just indoctrination. The beauty of religion is It requires no evidence. Only blind faith. Take 1 baby. Add 15 years of daily indoctrination. Reinforce with a promise of eternal damnation for bad behavior and an eternity of bliss for good behavior spent with the loved ones you have lost in life . What you get is a selective disregard for facts and belief in the unbelievable.
@13:37, having been through typhoon haiyan in 2013 and been in the middle of a storm surge, believe me, one would not doubt the power and scale and how quickly water can change a landscape. 😐 definitely, lots and lots of water in a short amount of time. Made me think, 'This must be a glimpse into the great flood in Noah's time...' Dare i say, even the winds sounded like angels on chariots.
@@joteirlinck4778 Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers? Science is a methodology; what you're talking about is an Ideology, that's not "science," that's something else. Let me ask you this... As an evolutionist, *how do you believe male and female evolved?* Charles Darwin gave a testable hypothesis for the validity of his theory, saying "if an organ were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down..." and he didn't have access to the fields of genetics or microbiology when he made up his theory. *If evolution is true, then how did male and female evolve?* Before you answer, consider that we're talking about *two separate, yet interdependent sets of organs* that had to evolve "by numerous, successive, slight modifications" (Darwin) and which are precision tuned with numerous single-points of failure. You have to explain the *organs* in keeping with this testable hypothesis. For example: The fallopian tubes are lined with millions of these little hairs that all wave the same direction, and their purpose is to guide the egg from the ovaries down into the uterus. If they stood still, laid flat, waved the wrong direction, or didn't exist - the egg would either die or it would implant in the fallopian tube thus killing the mother. Some of these are known medical conditions that prevent pregnancy - "Evolution" had to get these millions of hairs just right.... "by numerous, successive, slight modifications." *Simultaneously* the sperm has a whip like rotor, a motor encasing, a bushing like material, a nutrient transfer system, and several other components that all have to be working *just right* or the sperm can't find the egg. Reproduction and life fails. "Evolution" had to get the interdependent parts of the sperm "just right" ... "by numerous, successive, slight modifications." *Then* you have the placenta which does everything for the baby including keeping the mother's and baby's blood separate, the expanding and contracting uterus and cervix, the mechanism which only allows one sperm into the egg, and numerous other components that all had to be *designed* just right, or reproduction and life fails. "Evolution" had to *SIMULTANEOUSLY* get all of these just right "by numerous, successive, slight modifications." Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other hadn't evolved yet? And going backwards in time, which of these critical organs do you gradually reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications" while still enabling functional reproduction? *'So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them."* (Genesis 1:27)
In the '80s, Lake Powel was at capacity and they had to open the spillways to lower the water level. They were tunnels cut into the rock to pass water around the Glen Canyon dam. When they closed them weeks later and engineers inspected the tunnels, they were amazed at the erosion in the rock walls. This is the power of water.
@@SirDeanosity "Any rock"? So is there a reason why the supposed Grand Canyon impact is not seen everywhere? Oh wait- there isn't. So the comment means what exactly?
@@ozowen It seems your question was answered and yet you pontificate and avoid the answer, which was correct but it didn't back your wrong bias. A global flood would provide the cataclysmic evidence we see today. Science without the bias shows this to be true. Your bias does not change truth but you knew that. There's this thing called a search engine, it will help your vain misconceptions be righted.
@@chrislachat459 The dam in question is placed on highly porous rocks subject to cavitation and easy erosion. Feel free to explain how that is the same as all rock. Reasons why there is no global flood at any time in recent history. 1) No flood strata. After any large flood event, in particular ones where there is tumultuous movement, currents, collisions of currents, concurrent tectonic activity- then any unstable strata are forced into the water, strata destroyed and the resultant strata after everything has settles tends to cruder layering in flood order (sand silt clay). We should see that globally- we do not. 2) Any aerial strata cannot be anywhere in the so called flood sedimentary layers. We have a global one plus plenty of local and regional ones all through the geo strata 3) No dry layers should be anywhere- yet there are also plenty of them. 4) Fragile laminae such as those found in varve strata have no business being in such sediment. Too fragile to survive such activity, especially since they are almost always adjacent to mountains (which were supposedly thrust up in the flood). These are biennial strata and can be manually counted- going uninterrupted, globally, hundreds of thousands or millions of years. They should not even exist. 5) Fossils should always be in muddled order. Drowned carcasses only sink to the bottom when the water is very cold. But the rapid thrust of water from the deep means the water (and air btw) get superheated by the kinetic energy alone. 6) No clear sedimentary strata for the period should exist anywhere near the upthrust mountain ranges. But they predominate. There is much more of course, but that's a start
This morning, I thought about what the evolutionists say about the neanderthals and how they, somehow, turned into the present humans. I admit I did not have the answer to their claim, but I know the Bible doesn't make a mistake. Then, somehow, as if God had directed me to your video, the answer to the question I had this morning was answered. What an amazing God we have. He cares about what we think. Thanks for sharing your video. God bless you, sir.
@@cesarepelaschier4829 The central, and most important fact of the Bible is God's plan for redeeming the human race from sin. This plan's most crucial point was when God incarnated, became a man known as Jesus and eventually paid the punishment for our sins, then rose from the dead. Jesus gave testimony to the historicity of the flood, and the God inspired nature of the Bible. His resurrection is the single most important fact of history, and proves his divinity. If He gave testimony to the divinely inspired nature of the Bible, then that's what is true.
@@consul6262 No, they didn't evolve into humans. They were humans, albeit with some differences compared to the average human today, but still well within the genetic range of diversity of human beings.
Our amazing powerful God can do anything He wants and that includes creating this old blue ball we live on just as He tells us in Genesis! He is awesome and I'm glad I know Him and His Son Jesus!
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!
@@derrickdawes7598 You're the one believing something, here. Not me. (or in other words: you, calling me gullible for NOT believing certain claims, makes no sense at all). I believe something as true, if it can be demonstrated to be (most likely) true, and not because a guy called Derrick TELLS me it's _"the truth"._ That's what gullible people do, taking others on their word.
My wife and I have a small 10 acre farm. We grow many fruits and vegetables and flowers. There is no way that someone with eyes and an open mind not be able to see the hand of GOD in all the beauty and complexity of life whether plant or animal. Each plant has a relationship with the bugs and the roots of such plants with the bacteria in the soil. I could go on for hours but I'll just cut it short and say thank you my heavenly Father and to GOD be the glory.
Those various organisms have a symbiotic relationship because they co-evolved with one another over millions of years. No god needed at all to explain how nature functions.
William Elliott Why did you capitalize GOD? Similar to IN GOD WE TRUST on dollar bill? Get back to your lodge...
"We are surrounded by a world of incredible complexity, and beauty actually. And everything about the living world screams design. If you look at the way a body works, look at the way a body of any animal or any plant works -- it's clearly designed, you might think." --Richard Dawkins
@@josh2388 the one true GOD. Creater of all things deserves capitals.
@Rebecca P Yeah, like the Corona virus.
I love that we can watch the entire documentary for free. This is how the academic world is supposed to function - the free exchange of ideas, honest scientific inquiry, and the search for knowledge.
100% agree. Got to laugh at a “scientific” community that is incapable of admitting their pet theory has long since outlived any plausible hope of support by physical evidence. 😂 God bless their darling hearts…
I love that misinformation is free.
@@GilGTG Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people? This information isn't free, it's funded by tax payers and force fed to us for "free", and we are all uncritically indoctrinated into this atheistic origins mythology as young children. It's even in our cartoons and children's stories.
I plan on purchasing the documentary on DVD. Nothing is free. It wasn't free for these people to make this film. People deserve to be paid for their work and their knowledge, which can take decades to acquire. We should be willing to pay for their expertise.
Hear! Hear!
I'm a teacher in a Christian School, to see this, and listen to this information, makes cry. Thank you
My children and I are working a lesson on "Strada", and its formation. We have made several field trips to gather samples, and eventually will fill a jar to form "Strada" like sample. Now, I'm so excited to explain to them the truth. This is "Revival!".
@@wetshlovesusa2898 hallelujah! I believe this information should be taught. I pray they receive it. 🙏🏻
@@cortneyb777DO IT!!!!!!!
@@wetshlovesusa2898 You give us hope. May God bless you, your important work, and all you love ♥️
@@wetshlovesusa2898 this is why the federal government doesn’t fund private schools who “teach” without understanding. First of all, define “strada” never heard that term in geology. Are you talking about deposited sedimentary layers of rock? After it’s been lithified?
I thought it was called strata, not strada
I'm really glad this is up for free, when my pastor showed clips in church I was not yet saved, and rocks, fossils, biology, are all sciences that have peaked my interest, and I have a hard time seeing things and answering things without a secular evolutionist view.
You;re still not saved as there is no god. Without science, we would have nothing that we have today. We would still be living in caves, no farming, no anything really. The Bible itself is a thing because of science. Everything points to evolution(which has been documented), and nothing points to a god or creationism except for a belief.
Oh, you poor thing. You should open your Bible to Matt 28, Mark 16, Luke 24 & John 20. Be sure to read all 4 of these chapters before answering the following questions:
1. How many women visited the tomb of Jesus?
2. What did they see when they got there?
It's often been said, "The fastest way to become and Atheist is to actually read the Bible."
I pray your journey in searching out the truth has borne fruit
@@firecat3613those chapters were written by 4 different writers so of course there will be differences.
@@firecat3613you're Deceived by the devil!!! Repent, come to Christ and you will be delivered!😀
The Glory of God is so evident in this documentary is mind blowing! i am speechless i have no word to express how grand God is to me right now! Magnificent awesome amazing still cannot express how GRAND our Creator God is! give Him PRAISE!
Go find Dr. Stephen Meyer. He'll 🤯 too.
After seeing how quickly water ripped through North Carolina with Hurricane Helene in 2024 and changed the land so quickly, this theory about the Grand Canyon makes a lot of sense. A large amount of water can break down land so fast. Much faster than I realized.
@@mylesrv my thoughts exactly!
You’ve never passed a basic geology class, have you?
@@DisposableSupervillainHenchmannot everyone has taken geology.
@@DisposableSupervillainHenchmanNice, a pers
Nice, a personal attack instead of opinion. Tsk.@@DisposableSupervillainHenchmann
Couldn't get to sleep & found this last night. I really loved it! So many scientific people explaining it. Now if i could just get some others to take a look at this explanation rather than just listening to the popular view point.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Oh boy! I hate to be the bearer of bad news Nicholas but here is Evidence for young Earth;
Most dating methods gives a young world. Helium in atmosphere, Helium in ground, Meteor dust, Buildup of carbon 14, Human population, Natural plutonium, Sodium in sea, Sediment in sea, Erosion of continents, Earth's magnetic field, Oil leaks in earth, Natural gas in earth, Orphan radiohalos, Decay of rock magnetism, Tight bends in rocks, Coral reef growth, Oldest living plants, Human civilizations, River delta growth, Undersea oil seepage, Uranium in sea, Rotation of spiral galaxies, Decay of comets, Dust on the moon, Slowing of earth's rotation, Heat loss from earth, Niagara Falls erosion and many more.
Billions of years is story telling.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Also there is no such thing as evolution (No evidence for it). You continue to lie to the students with no science to back it up.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Provide evidence for evolution. I know you can not do it as there is none. All talk and no action. Good Luck!
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Just as I thought, NOTHING! You are a liar.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Still Nothing?
Excellent work. I've had a foundation of God's Word and His Creation built into me as a young person and still greatly enjoy hearing the consistency and proof of God's existence and intentions in His Creation. Thanks for putting this together and giving us a great opportunity to review and strengthen the Truth.
This is a MUST watch for all world views. From "Creationism" to "Evolutionism", and all in between. Absolutely packed with fabulous information. There's something for everyone here in this documentary. Incredible world we live in... Shalom shalom.
Well, no. Most of the info is incorrect, from using a testing method on Mt St Helens that was not supposed to be used for anything younger than 2 million years old, which these people did, to comparing erosion in 2 different places with 2 different materials. It is much easier and quicker for ash to erode than it is for rock. But with the Shalom, you are cousins of Christianity and Judaism.
Yes, we DO live in an incredible world, one that was not created by any god.
Fabulous information? I do believe you spelled, "fabricated," incorrectly.
@@billybob4274 It's nice to see I'm not alone. Perhaps I can offer you a warning before engaging with these people. You and I must adhere to verifiable evidence and proven facts. Both of which will be denied, sometimes for reasons as blatantly ridiculous as, "your reality does not align with my delusions and feelings." We MUST also adhere to logic and reason, wherein these are two places the religiously challenged never dare go.
@@firecat3613it’s interesting that you came across this video and that you made a comment. Have you ever just wondered if you’re possibly wrong? Maybe not. You have come to your conclusion a long time ago and nothing will shake you is my guess. I hope that changes some day.
I was once atheist. I read, asked questions, until I started reading the Bible I had no idea how powerful truth is and majestic God truly is. I started in Job and I was intrigued but when I read Genesis it started changing my world view.
For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made...
Romans 1:20
❤️
@@Kenlydfordyou literally just quoted the Bible as if that’s going to convince someone of your worldview. Imagine I’m trying to prove to you that the Quran is the holy word and I just use information in the Quran to convince you…
I was religious, truly believed, was raised on it, prayed, though god was listening to my every thought. Then all I had to do was keep an open mind. Carefully study reason history, math, science. Realize that it’s impossible to part the Red Sea… and bam you realize the Bible is a story book and not meant to be taken literally. But it goes further, you start to realize that nothing on this planet at this very moment requires any miracles to work. Well then you think wow, if nothing has required god to exist, why would I believe they exist? Believe it all you want but, don’t act like atheist and agnostics finding a religion video (and having an open mind enough to watch it, or be entertained at the bad science and deception) is somehow evidence that the spirit brought them here. That’s just delusion man, believe all you want, free world to do that thanks to secular government
My wife and I like this presentation so much that we have watched it many times .
Me and my wife give each other sloppy toppy twice a week to it. In the name of the Lord.
There’s a vast wealth of other information out there, step away from the brainwashing now and try a second video elsewhere.
This documentary has changed my husband's belief! Thank you for making this documentary and posting this on youtube. My husband didn't believe in God and didn't believe there was a creator all his life until he watched this documentary in 2021. He was lead to research about God after his employer decided to have a vaccine mandate to all their employees but gave religious exemptions. After watching this documentary, my husband claimed religious exemption and in his letter to his employee, he declared that there is a God who gave him his immune system and is good enough to fight any virus. Thank God he got the religious exemption from getting the vaccine! Keep up the good fight Is Genesis History team and God bless! We've purchased the movie and have been sharing this movie with family and friends.
I Love this testimony! Praise the LORD! God bless you & your husband!!!!!
Humanity has worked a long time without divine help to rid ourselves of the worst diseases imaginable: polio, smallpox, measles, mumps, rubella, rsv, flu, diptheria, tetanus, and many more. I hope your husband doesn't have to learn by experience what humanity has had to learn.
That being said, I have a deep and abiding hatred for anti vaxxers.
Just ask the millions who died of COVID whether, if they were given a second chance, they would take the vaccine shot. I wonder what they would say!
Amazing 💯%🙏
@@scrumpymanjack how many boosters are you up to?
There is two ways to live your life,
One way is to live as if there are no miracles,
The other way is to live as everything is a miracle.
The whole universe and everything in it is a miracle!
(quoted from Einstein)
There ARE two ways...
Best Answer
If we start to believe in ”miracles”, we can never be sure of anything. Just anything can happen any time.
I am a geologist in Colorado. You can see the Great Unconformity here in several places. I remember, as a student at CU Boulder, all my professors clearly stated that no one knows why the Great Unconformity exists. It’s b/c they re viewing it from a secular worldview.
Please explain what is the great unconformity
@@spicyroads unbiased? Oh the irony.
Do you see large boulders embedded in mudflow rocks? some of them are incredibly massive. It took alot of water to throw them around
@@spicyroads secular is the opposite of unbiased
Any scientist unwilling to declare that they do not know is not worth your time. Science is inductive - it can only ever disprove falsities.
Your ministry was a major reason of me coming to Christ. I couldn’t justbelieve, I had to know.
Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic.
He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on.
The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north.
In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin"
The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind"
The sun is "The light of the World"
The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea.
"He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays.
Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo.
The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass.
The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12.
The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30.
The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes.
The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected.
The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe.
In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens.
Jesus is a fictional allegory for the sun. Christianity is ancient astrology. It's just fables about the sun.
Check out Acharya S aka D.M Murdock for more info.
.. .. . .. ..
@JESUS slaves, it's a shame none of it is true.
@@Gamefan86 behind me Satan! I researched it all and found the Truth. I won’t give you counterarguments because you won’t read them but continue searching the Truth and you will find it.
I know you will come back here someday and say you found Jesus. Because all that search for Truth sincerely will find it. Meanwhile I’m praying for you
@@JmenChristpas If you researched and still came up believing in god, then you didn't really research. Christianity stole everything it is from different religions. They weren't the first monotheist god, not the first resurrection, no the first to die, etc. Even stole pagan holidays to help get people to convert. Christmas, Halloween, and Easter. Actually research and learn. You researched nothing. Happy Saturnalia.
This film was well thought out and explained everything very well. I'm a Christian and a science nerd. I loved this.
I saw this on Netflix back in 2017. Finally, a documentary about the planet that makes sense. And it's so well done!
Netflix? I thought this platform is just a godless entertaining place!
_"Finally, a documentary about the planet that makes sense."_ Nothing in the bible makes sense.
@@edgarmatzinger9742 Explain what does not make sense.
@@edgarmatzinger9742 I second that challenge. What exactly does not make sense. Cite the Biblical verses that you allege as nonsense and let us analyze them in their proper context.
@@davidhawkes1981 _"Cite the Biblical verses that you allege as nonsense"_ The verses about Jesus walking on water and turning it into wine. Just like those about to sell your raped daughter to her rapist. Or those on how to keep your slaves. And Genesis? Doesn't make any sense. And context? That's the way an apologist tries to make awkward things in the bible go away.
Brilliant documentary- without all the lies, the world makes sense. The Almighty is the creator of all - I am in awe and praise. Thank you 🙏
Religion is a lie, there is no proof of gods
The Bible is nothing but lies. Every single thing in the Bible was written well after the supposed events took place. It was passed down orally, and we know that is accurate 😉🤣
Maybe I missed it, did they show any dinosaur and rabbit fossils found together?
@@cadon35 That's not something a creationist would predict. All Glires (Including rabbits) appear after the K/Pg boundary which is post-flood. Their ancestors, which were rodents, do exist in the strata of dinosaurs. This includes multituberculates, Protungulatum, Alphadon, Purgatorius, Kryptobaatar, etc. All these were the rodents that were related to the ones that got on the ark. After the flood, they spread out and repopulated the Earth's new ecological niches. Then they diversified into the many rodent/rabbit species we see today. Which later recessions of ice and sediment buried and fossilized in the ice age. So you're right, you technically don't see rabbits with dinosaurs. But you do see their ancestors together with the dinosaurs (many of which are identical to the rodents of today).
Pointing and laughing
This host reminds me a lot of Mike Row...he is very attentive to each of the interviewees and contributes to the conversation in a meaningful way. Great documentary. Thank you❤
That's called reading from a script... But yes, it was well done.
Mike Rowe is a realist who wants to help people. These people want to enslave people to a belief.
Yeah, he does favor Rowe a bit, I see it.
VERY...VERY WELL DONE!!! My heart leaped at every segment of truth and WISDOM!!! Thank you!!!
You should probably get your heart checked.
A must see presentation for all who love the subject on Bible Science and Creation.
Nicholas, everyone in this film, including the host, is doctorate level educated. Which science are you referring to?…Everyone, including those scientists you choose to agree with, are giving opinions. They’re giving hypotheses. Carbon dating, at best, is highly inaccurate and unreliable. No one, including those scientists 200 years ago, was around to validate any claims. This representation, to me, has indeed met the standard to be given consideration.
@Nicholas Christie-Blick you aren't a good scientist you actually believe in fairy tales and lies, I'm sorry for your lack of faith, and also hate for Christianity and God, you must be a big sinner
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 "They are contradicted by things we learnt"
or false narratives that are pushed? No... no... cant quesiton things
@@rebsince71 Are all who claim to know God Holy and Righteous ?
Does no one use religion for evil purpose ?
If not , how would you discern their differences ?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😛 Oxymoron=bible science. lol Moron=religious person.
Absolutely brilliant. Thankyou for putting so much effort into a brilliant documentary. God bless!!!!!
Excellent. Every classroom should see this film!
I can't stress enough how bad of idea this is for Christians that wish to keep their kids involved in Christianity. Or just have them become scientifically literate.
If kids are taught this set of demonstrably false facts, there is a high potential they'll eventually learn real science and do a 180 on their belief through a sense of betrayal.
It's what happened to me and a few of my friends.
@@TTTristan1 My guess is that you have figured out a way to be comfortable with your sin and lay hold to "science" to buttress your position. A lot of stuff falls under the heading of "Christianity," much of it bad. A personal relationship with The True and Living Christ is quite another. It's the finished work of Jesus upon the cross, shedding His Life's Blood for the remission if sin, nothing more, nothing less, that opens up the pathway to true science.
@ This response feels pretty lackluster to atheists who went through the wringer on being taught what's sinful and desperately tried to avoid sin for all of their born again life.
I don't believe sin exists. I don't believe anything supernatural exists. It's easy to want to assume that I didn't do my due diligence, that I wanted to sin, that I was misled, or that getting to the truth of the matter wasn't my goal, but I feel justified in my worldview. A worldview in which I've reviewed Christianity and creationism after believing whole-heartedly in it, and found it lacking integrity.
@@TTTristan1 Well, I would imagine there's a lot of things that seem lackluster to the atheist. After all, what's the point? If you tried to live the Christian life and failed, well, one hundred percent of those that attempt fail. You cannot apply the Christian life living in a fleshly body. You have to plug in to the source-The Holy Spirit empowering The Holy Scriptures. You cannot be saved until you realize that you are hopelessly lost. The center of power is in the middle of the cross. Trust and obey.
@@rickyblackburn-n9e I understood that at the time and was trying to do exactly as you explained. I felt I was lost, broken, and needed the one and true triune god to save and guide me. I did trust and obey. And it didn't complete me. I felt utterly miserable and I couldn't accept that a good god would require blind faith, because then any idea or religion could request the same and I would have no reason to deny blindly believing in it. I would be a hypocrite not to.
Thanks
After reading many comments and having watched numerous high-level debates between Creationists and Evolutionists, it becomes abundantly clear that this is a "heart" issue more than a "head" issue.
Maybe God created evolution.
@@WildPhotoShooter Look in the mirror.
@@WildPhotoShooter Exactly. Faith is the belief in the unknown. If it was known we wouldn't need to use our faith.
@@immar1075 That's not entirely accurate. You have faith in the pilot every time you step onto an airplane, faith in a doctor every time they operate on you, faith in your teacher every time you uncritically accept what they are teaching you as true (evolution?). That's what faith is. Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that you are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can quantum pop into existence and create themselves at any moment? I don't have enough *faith* to believe in those very unscientific assertions my friend....
@@michael9237 " Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that you are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can quantum pop into existence and create themselves at any moment? I don't have enough faith to believe in those very unscientific assertions my friend...."
Where did you ever get the idea that I believe any of which you spoke above. You assume much my friend....
The whole bible is history... with the whole truth --- unlike what we were taught in "school".
He did say in Revelations that the knowledge of man would speed up in the latter days & that He would reveal Himself to those who didn't believe by that knowledge . What better way then proving Himself to be the creationist in the growth of proof that He is allowing our modern Scientists to embrace such as with Francis Collins Faith that God created it all & now attending Church as a Christian after decades of being an obnoxious atheist as he once was. .
Thank you for putting out this beautiful film and for FREE! Glory be to God, God bless.
Glory be to God, for all the enslaving, the rapes, the murders, the starvation, the cancers.... Need I go on?
@@billybob4274 LOL I hope there are no sharp instruments in your home.
@@billybob4274(sigh) Again with the “Blaming God for all the bad things in life” God is all good,nothing bad comes from him.Everything that is happening in this world is not God's work.
What a great fascinating, thought-provoking, eye-opening, and factual Documentary. HOW GREAT IS OUR GOD! UNMEASURABLE BEYOND HUMAN MIND. Please consider accepting my endless love and support here from the Philippines. Really really worth it to watch!. Consider my endless gratitude brothers and sisters out there! God Loves you beyond your own understanding.
Mabuhay! We're in Davao City. What place are you in?
Define factual i mean Jesus Christ you people are living in a fantasy land lol grow up
@@matthewboster5506Says the man saying “Jesus Christ” 😂
very powerful and thank you to all who made this factual events come to life in the 20th century. Christianity Is The Beacon Of Light Love for GOD and Hope .
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 your butt-hurt screeds don't change anyone's minds. Common sense easily shows truth will rule over you. Selah
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 LOL. Atheist are religious, that's were the common sense comes in. Atheist have made "science" their religion of choice, not that it implies they're any smarter, just more arrogant. Science is God's creation, so it therefore makes known what is applied to our lives and in our lives. Christian's with this view have no problem with a young earth just as God describes in Genesis. That's what this video shows and it's why unbelievers gnash their teeth in anger. Don't like it, move on. We are steadfast.
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 You sound hurt... are you alright? Cuz competing in a shouting match against Christians isn't gonna do anything.
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 The cool thing about the Bible is that it never says how old the universe is. Genesis just begins with, "Now the earth was formless and empty" so for all we know, the universe itself could actually be billions of years old. It also doesn't mention how long Adam and Eve were on the earth for before the fall into sin. The earth itself could also be billions of years old, since no animals would have died in a perfect world. And yes, it can be frustrating sometimes seeing Christians wander into an argument and get blasted because they don't correctly know how to defend their faith. I've seen Christians say terrible things and not act like they should (Im on ifunny, so that should explain a lot). That's the effect of sin in the world because nobody is perfect. My "philosophy" is just seeing other people as... well, people. We often get caught up in everything that we forget that a comment online was made by a real person with their own life and experiences. So if everyone is willing to see the other side from a different perspective, we could truly open our minds and find what the universal truth is.
Well, that's my rant for today. Thanks for listening and not being rude. Have a good day ;)
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 Ayy no problem. That's awful to hear as well. These days I feel like "Christians" just use the title to make themselves feel superior. It's just depressing as the rest of us get a bad name. The way you spot a true Christian is the way they act. If they always act out of turn and force their religion on others, everything becomes a huge problem. True Christians try to act as we believe Jesus did - even loving our enemies, which seems impossible at times. Of course, that doesn't mean we don't make mistakes. Everyone is sinful... but all have been saved. Hats off to ya 🎩
I’m in my 50’s as I grow old I do appreciate everything I see miracles every single day
@@maylingng4107 With respect, what's miraculous is that evolutionists literally believe that mass quantities of ordered and sequenced instructions (DNA) can come into existence out of non-information without an intelligent source in contrast to every other observable instance of information in existence which always has an intelligent source . It's sad that when they run into a problem like young comets that don't fit in their billions of years atheistic religion (evolution, Big Bang, etc.), they are willing to fabricate entire celestial objects like Oort clouds without a shred of observable evidence . When we find young soft tissues in dinosaur fossils, or young C-14 inside of diamonds, coal deposits all across the US, and in fossils from every geologic layer, evolutionists just reject it and twist the evidence to fit their atheistic religious beliefs concerning our origins. Then when the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and other laws of physics contradict each other at the beginning of the universe (making it naturally impossible) they invoke infinite alternate universes... a supernatural solution that supersedes our observable laws of nature, and btw, *infinite alternate universes and realities mean that there is inevitably an alternate universe that is run by magical fairies and with T-Rex's driving tanks down the street... that means that this popular atheist theory requires atheists to concede that their beliefs include the possibilities of magical fairies and other absurd fictional ideas.* And all along the way, you literally believe that we are distantly related to a banana, among so many other problems.... and then they call it "science."
Evolution - the internally inconsistent, existentially unviable atheistic religion with a history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, and which cannot explain basic things that it should be able to explain. These things are not a problem for a biblical worldview.
I'm not sure you have any grounds to mock Christians May Ling Ng. "It is appointed for man to die once, then comes judgment" (Hebrews 9:27).
In the end almost every atheist will argue that there are thousands of universes and we happen to live in the one where life could exist the way it has and is now. So where exactly is the machine that's spitting out thousands of universes and where does it get the mass and energy to do so? People often criticize any religious belief strictly because they do not want to answer for anything and live as they see fit. Don't judge them for that show them love, hate and blood profits mankind nothing
@May Ling This isn't a question of evidence, it's a matter of competing worldviews over the exact same evidence. For example, please consider the following observations from your belief system (several of which you have personally championed here): The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...*
The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality).
And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview.
Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent.
And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias.
GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.
@@michael9237 MICHAEL you are a absolute Menace to atheist in this comment section and I’ve read so meny of your comments, I’m a brother in Christ is there any way I could get in contact with you, Facebook ,snap chat email, phone number anything man, I’m very Shook by your intellect and I would like to talk to you farther brother
@@maylingng4107 There is a word for people who fail to see life for the precious gift it is...bigoted or hateful.
I been looking for this video for 51 years and I finally found it ! From now on Im going to sleep in peace.
Please tell us more..
Sarcastic XD
Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic.
He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on.
The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north.
In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin"
The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind"
The sun is "The light of the World"
The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea.
"He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays.
Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo.
The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass.
The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12.
The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30.
The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes.
The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected.
The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe.
In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun throug the heavens.
Interesting and cool things. There would be no problem with much of what you are saying. It can be two things at the same time though.
The bible is the best Book for society and tells us the most of our universe and salvation. It certainly is different than other religion since it is anti-works based salvation meaning that you can not earn your salvation by your own good works.
Отличный фильм! Огромная благодарность всем создателям фильма, обязательно покажу его своим детям)
this is nonsense! who believes in these lies. these are melted buildings, stone and brick! compare it to Sodom and Gomorrah and you will see the difference or you won't!!
no difference same forms! Ron Wyatt
замечательно от людей, которые привезли нам Санта-Клюз
Действительно, согласен. Отличный фильм
Большое спасибо! Мы рады, что вам понравилось.
It's amazing how God talks to us w/o us not even knowing it. I am a believer and yesterday, I had a question as to why there are a lot of different species of dogs and birds and how do they connect to GOd's creation. Today, this video got suggested. I watched it and my question is answered. Yay! What an amazing GOd we have.
Evolution is what happen
@@christopherlastname7638
You do realize that ALL dog breads of today are descended from wolves... yes.?
This was not a case of evolution, but of breeding to the point of a loss of information(narrower and narrower gene pools).... with absolutely no additions of genetic information, whatsoever, at all.
Rather than merely parroting what you've been programmed with ~mere theories~ try to engage that grey matter between your ears a wee bit. There has NEVER been one credible transition fossil, specifically showing the evolution from one "kind" to another. They have all been proven fallacious, hoaxes designed to brainwash, but were successful only in their own "debunking" upon closer study... be it through dna testing or exposure by another researcher.
Evolution, as is propagated today, does not exist my friend.
@@michaeljameson6468 Evolution teaches that one species branched out an became others....which a species' genome makes impossible. Evolution also teaches that all living things came from a rock or even nothing.
@@christopherlastname7638 micro evolution or natural selection is not in doubt...evolution teaches that on species can become another...a dog can become a cat given enough time...evolution is a fairy tale at DNA put the lie to.
@@mamamarianovits9029 the fossil called "Lucy" it's a great example of a transitional fossil.
But what does it matter to you?
You have decided what you believe, so you will ignore any evidence to the contrary. ....but you are naive and immature enough to suggest other people "use their grey matter."
I can tall you that I have used mine. All of the physical world I see around me tells me that a supernatural being creating everything around us makes no sense to me.
I find the amazing story of the changes in our physical world to be much more interesting. I don't resent people who disagree. They should believe what they like.
Thanks!
I came across this channel and I am glad I watched it fully it was a mystery of time. God is great and did not give us all the wisdom he have, that leaves us a mistery to think. Praise God almighty who created heaven and earth.
Shame it's all nonsense really.
Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic.
He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on.
The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north.
In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin"
The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind"
The sun is "The light of the World"
The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea.
"He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays.
Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo.
The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass.
The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12.
The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30.
The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes.
The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected.
The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe.
In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun throug the heavens.
@@ozowen prove it . . .
@@Gamefan86
Interesting...
reminds me of when the the True God's 10 plagues insulted ancient Egypt's many gods,at least one was proved powerless with every plague God brought against Egypt.
I've never thought of Jesus's actions insulting the pagan sungod worship,which was so prolific among the pagans, with his miracles as well. Thank you for this information.
Absolutely awesome presentation of Biblical truth. Thanks so must for the enlightenment
The Buybull contains maybe 25% truth and 75% lies.
@ That is hardly convincing without any evidence to support your claim
There’s the Truth and then there’s the biblical truth😂
The Universe declare HIS Majesty, Glorious Hallelujah! Thank YOU God almighty Elohim. Genesis is History!!!!
Amen....
I love ❤️ this video all over again! (all the subject matters)!
You ok bro?
This was definitely an eye opener into the complex world that our Lord God created! I loved listening and could not put my phone down until the end! ❤
Hi Cindy, If you ever have the opportunity to watch this on a laptop (even a small one), many scenes are quite visual, like the scenes of the Grand Canyon & others. I watched from an older iPad that my son gave me for Christmas 4 yrs ago. May God richly bless you & your loved ones.
To anyone interested, “THE ARK & THE DARKNESS,” a NEW BIBLICALLY BASED MOVIE being released for 2 days only, will be shown in theaters on March 20th & 21st, 2024 (DATES MAY BE DIFFERENT) depending on your location.
I too suppressed between my spiritual experiences and what appeared as lapses in scripture yet having faith that God is true. Then I began to learn of these truths in an apologetics class. It is the calming balm in these days of uncertainty. For there is one certainty - God is.
Yeah, He found me in His written word June 18th last year. God is good.
ZZzzz.... ZZzzz.... ZZzzz.... ZZzzz....
Indeed❤️✝️❤️
@Jimbo Bell We collectively are God my friend. We are the only creatures on earth that can combine information into formulating new ideas. We also have the ability to heal ourselves and have supernatural abilities just like "Ice Man".
Here is another piece of evidence that I hope you find useful, from one Christian to another:
Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there?
For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things).
Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.
Absolutely among the most important videos i have EVER viewed.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 I do not agree with you
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 I'm very proud of you Nicholas for pursuing your degree.
@@WayneMemphisMojo
Your agreement or disagreement is irrelevant.
The literally understood creation myths are a nonsense.
@@WayneMemphisMojo Little good that it may be.
@@ozowen I am a creationist
I know my experience is only anecdotal but I once watched a very strong flash flood cut away a swath of earth at least 20 feet deep and a half mile long of what had previously been solid rock. Rushing water is incredibly strong and once rocks get mixed with it, even solid granite rock walls are ripped away by the force. This happened in New Mexico during the summer monsoons late 1980's. It all happened in about a half hour. I remember walking out into the gorge it left. The landscape was completely changed - gone in fact. It was a place where my young wife and I often walked our dog and I also remember joking with my wife that I wonder if this how the grand canyon was formed and we laughed and said maybe it took only a couple of years and not billions. I actually think the instantaneous force of water is a more credible explanation for the Grand Canyon then the slow erosion of billions of years.
Have you ever BEEN to the Grand Canyon!!!
It is NOT composed of unconsolidated till like shown in this video. The rocks (ROCKS not soil!) are different layers of differing hardness and types that contain embedded fossils that can be seen to be of a specific type in each layer. There are several places where the planes of the sedimentary rock are tilted to extreme angles as well. NOT the result of a quick outflow of debris material but rather a slow sedimentation process that shows that different types of material were laid down at different times. ALSO the bottom of the canyon cuts through many hundreds of feet of very hard IGNEOUS rock! Rock that was molten and then solidified underground.
This guy's equating of his little stream and erosion gully to the Grand Canyon is completely ludicrous!
Rather than finding someone who supports your pre-conceived ideas and conclusion, why don't you look at the actual evidence first! Understand the parameters that must have existed before the Grand Canyon could have been cut and then get a real and actual conclusion.
You obviously have no background in soil geology, rock geology, hydraulic physics, paleontology, geomorphology or any credible science discipline.
Grand Canyon's rough dimensions: 1 mile deep, 10 miles wide, 100 miles long. Through SOLID ROCK!
@ megaterang- least 20 feet deep and a half mile long. Multiple that by 10,000 feet at least. Open mindedness. Global not county. Watch the video. If you did you closed your hearing!
megaterang yeah, a global flood! Duh! It only makes sense. I’ve thought about this for a long time. It’s actually annoying how dumb smart people can be. Forgive them God. Strengthen us to love them!
@@jimmyray5524 Hundreds of Creationist scientists have changed their minds. None of the millions of other scientists have. Why would that be ?????
Ross Rosco
, you wrote, "Hundreds of Creationist scientists have changed their minds. None of the millions of other scientists have. Why would that be ?????"
None? You must live in a cave. I believed in evolution until I was in my 60's. An examination of the geologic column converted me. There is no way those thick, homogeneous, uneroded, unbioturbated sedimentary rock layers were gradually deposited. A global flood is the only thing that makes scientific sense.
Dan
“Time is not a magic wand that solves all the geologic problems of the world!”
Well I’m definitely using that statement in the future.
Love this video. Thank you.
I am amazed at how often Luke 19:40 is shown here. It is woven throughout. While humans in general and certain Christians remain silent, the rocks are declaring the Glory of God.
But your god doesn't exist. Fact. So the rocks you're babbling about don't declare anything. Who wrote Luke? Hint: not Luke.
@@patrickvanbaal2837 That's because you put your Faith in the modern mythology that puddles can turn themselves into people if you wait a real long time, fish evolve into philosophers, and entire mathematically ordered universes can pop themselves into existence at any moment... we just don't have enough faith to believe in that.
For all your anti-God assertions, you sure do suspiciously live perfectly in line with everything He said about you. See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals?
On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed.
This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview.
You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15)
"But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)
@@patrickvanbaal2837 You'll be surprise when you see God with your own eyes in spiritual body.
@@michael9237 "we just don't have enough faith" Yes....creationists are extremely lacking in faith, that's why they're all liars!
In talking with the wife of a geologist: She said he studied the Grand Canyon, & floated the river; concluding it had to have formed underwater (submarine).
Interesting. That complies with the conclusions presented here as well of large water-borne depositions and the bit about the underwater sand dunes locked in the upper limestone layer.
@@christianclark347 Yup, it all formed in a giant flood.
I love this video. I watched it about a year ago, and I rewatched it today. I think I’ll be watching it again and again, because there is so much information here. My kids are all interested in science - they each have a personal favorite - and they have asked me several questions about how different scientific principles seem to disprove our faith. This video answers their questions. It also shows them that Christianity and science aren’t mutually exclusive. Hearing marine biologists, geologists, paleontologists and astronomers explain how their fields of expertise prove Creation has helped me reconcile my family’s devout faith with our love of science.
Thank you so much for this video, it is truly a gift. And, of course, Thank God for making this video possible!! To Him go the Glory!!
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 outstanding ego my friend!👏👏👏
@@matman4464
Or he is speaking truth. Which is far more likely- ego or not.
I applaud you for not giving in to the scientifically ludicrous mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that puddles can literally turn themselves into people if you just wait a really really long time, and that "nothing created everything accidentally." Unfortunately you fell into the militant atheist troll trap on this page... but amen sister. Look up GotQuestions if you need answers to hard Bible questions.
Your kids are not "meaningless evolved protoplasm" in a meaningless chemical universe that doesn't care about you - they are valuable human beings made in the image of God.
*"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"* (Romans 3:23)
*"The wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord"* (Romans 6:23)
*"It is appointed for man to die once, then comes Judgment"* (Hebrews 9:27)
@@michael9237
Mikey will actually try to encourage you to lie to your kids.
The "science" on this video is nonsense. Your kids might start by being fooled, but when they eventually learn actual science, and the actual scientific method, then this fetid BS will necessarily fall by the wayside.
Then you will need to deal with the fact that your kids will regard all that you "explained" to them as nonsense. That's a normal parent thing- so no worries.
But the fact that they will likely turn away from God because the limited and nonsensical version preached here- well that will be a sad thing indeed.
I just don't have enough faith to believe that fish evolve into philosophers and that puddles can turn themselves into people if you just wait a really long time. Here's an observation/question: 1-) DNA contains mass quantities of ordered, sequenced, encoded information that "tells" your body how to grow, including instructions for your eye.
2-) Every single observable instance of information in existence always has an intelligent source (the words on this screen, in a book, programming in your computer, etc.)
Conclusion) Therefore, consistently interpreted, the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source (a Creator - God). How do you handle this observable evidence?
Do you:
A) Consistently interpret this evidence - the information in DNA had an intelligent source like the rest of the observable evidence.
B) Inconsistently interpret the evidence - information in DNA Unscientifically must be the exception to all the rest of the observable evidence. Information created itself from non-information just that one time.
C) Deny that it's information, it's just chemicals - chemicals just fizz into your eye's concave light-refracting lens, 137M light sensitive cells, 40M nerve endings, and precise muscles that auto-focus this complex optical system 100,000 times a day.
D) Ignore the evidence, say "well science just doesn't know yet," insist on an Atheistic/Naturalistic explanation.
*Wouldn't it be more scientifically consistent to interpret the information in DNA as also having an Intelligent Source, like all the rest of the observable evidence...?*
Your answer speaks volumes about your scientific/unscientific worldview assumptions/biases.
감사합니다.
Wow, I'm thoroughly impressed! The effort and creativity you've put into this video really shine through. Can't wait to see more!
Thank you @Biblical_Mystery! There is much more to come!
This is laughable to anybody with a proper education in the sciences and geology.
@@GreatDaneAV Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance if you just wait a long enough *time,* and that planets can randomly clump together to meet 122 precise anthropic constants (conditions required for life) - a 1 in 10^138 probability - from a "Big Bang" by chance?
Science is a methodology. What you're talking about is an Ideology, and I just don't have enough faith to believe that these unscientific beliefs happened by chance, never mind the many scientific problems with them.
*"The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse"* (Romans 1:20)
I Thank YOU All" SO Much",
For That Christian program
Of (GENESIS History"!).
The only Things). They didn't talk about Was
THE Many "Earthquakes". Of
"THAT'S HAPPENED"😳." THROUGHOUT The Many HUNDREDS OF YEARS".
@@GreatDaneAV okay my bulle, gaan huil by jou ma.
" (A)Paradigm ( has been) imposed on the data rather the the data providing the paradigm". Makes sense.
That's literally what christians do with science. They have a narrative paradigm established by the bible and their faith and then cherry pick evidence to support their claims and ignore the evidence that refutes them. I work with a seventh day Adventist that believes in "biblical science" and we get into arguments all the time that end with him throwing up his hands saying "That's what i believe and nothing will change it!". That is the complete opposite of the scientific method
@@nicholaseaves2591 Mr. eaves, that's literally what atheists do with science as well. It's a matter of competing worldview interpretations over the exact same evidence, the difference is that atheistic-Naturalism is demonstrably internally inconsistent, it has an embarrassing history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, it can't explain foundational things that it ought to be able to explain, and it is not existentially viable (ie. you can't live it out in reality). We already discussed how atheistic-Naturalists believe in Supernatural phenomena (and you tried to say that pre-existence is "natural" - God is pre-existent)... you know, for all your anti-God assertions, you sure do suspiciously live perfectly in line with everything He said about you.
See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals? On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed.
This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview.
You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15)
"But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)
it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because ... science.
@@michael9237 the religious answer has no explanatory mechanism. Intelligent design can't be tested. It's not even close to comparable with scientific theory
@@michael9237 btw, im not going to reply to all the assertions in your novel of a comment. Try to be more concise. This is a youtube comment thread. Not a college dissertation
I have learned so much more about science and history and archeology listening to all these videos than I did in school .
These videos spew total rubbish.. Creationism & Genesis are completely false. Evolution is real!
@@Paul-hl8yg There are missing links. This video states changes via evolution, but only changes within a species. The thing I'm confused by is the Earth being 6000 years old when ancient trees exist that have rings showing 20,000 years. So Bible says 6000 years yet there is clear proof of 20,000 years at the very least. I know carbon 14 dating is a mess for dates beyond 20,000 years.
@@martinwoodworth3715 Creationism is false, utterly & completely false! .. The Earth is millions of years old, the sun older than the Earth & the Universe 13.7 billion years old. All these are facts, that have been studied. The data that makes these figures, come from many sources. Evolution is completely true & again, many sciences all come together for this. The whale, for instance.. We have found fossil evidence that they once walked on land. We have found transitional fossils, creatures that once lived & were ancestors of the whales. Whales are mammals, they breath air, like all mammals. Even their tail bones show, that they once walked, not swam! All fish have gills & do not breath air like mammals. Fish tails always go from side to side. Yet all the mammals in the seas, their tales go up & down. The bones in those aquatic mammal, show ankles, knees etc, that have elongated & changed for swimming. There are microscopic creatures living on our eyelashes, which clean them. They eat the debris on the lashes. Since the invention of mascara, these creatures have evolved. Everytime someone uses mascara, the creatures start to die off. However before they do, the last eggs laid, hatch with their digestive systems changed, to only eat mascara! Then, when the person stops using mascara, the same happens again, but the creatures have adapted their digestive system, to only eat the normal debris again. This is evolution in action, a creature adapting to its environment physically, for existence. There is no proof or verifiable evidence for any of the worlds deities, none, zero! Yet an abundance of data, proof & verified evidence for the old Earth & for Evolution!
@@Paul-hl8yg If carbon 14 dating can't be trusted beyond 20,000 years I want to know how they date rocks to be 4.5 billion years. I'm very open minded & not a Christian. I am spiritual & love science. Science is our ability to understand our surroundings. Bible talks of beings living 800 years, these were aliens. They messed with our dna theory is very interesting theory too.
@@martinwoodworth3715 Also, always always remember.. Anything that claims to be a "god", is not worthy of that title! And, if such a great being actually existed, surely it couldn't just exist? Surely 'it' had to have a beginning? Surely 'it' had a parent/s or species to belong to itself? Firstly Man invented gods, then they decided there must only be 'one'. Why? The Pharaoh Akhanaten was the first in recorded history to claim, there was only One (the Aten) & the word spread. Then people, later to become "Jews", carried that forth, making their own religion, with their own "one god". Plagiarism is rife within religion!
I profoundly hope that we could have Chinese translation (and other languages) of these documentaries. My IELTS 6.5 still hasn't enabled me to fully understand the content, but I'm really interested and I pause so frequently to make sure I understand every idea.
The amount of evidence revealed in this well-made documentary is shocking and revolutionary. If one watches this objectively, one cannot but conclude that some of the currently accepted theories of the origin of life, the flood, and other subjects are severely distorted and based on incomplete evidence and/or are influenced through false presuppositions. This explains thoroughly and offers a more sound understanding of the treated subjects. Well done and glory to God!
" in this well-made documentary is shocking and revolutionary" I disagree I watched a couple of sections and groaned at the rubbish. Like the part were they say that "you have to look at the text" about the Bible then they lie about what the Bible says about genealogy of Joseph. So a challenge pick any section of this post it here and we will look at this evidence together.
DD DDD Do you presuppose that there is no Creator, despite a creation? Awkward.
@@alphatav3733 Are you presupposing that all acts of creation require a thinking being some how? Where did you get that from? A volcano explodes creating a hole and new landscape do you think that means the volcano is an intentional being?
DD DDD so you presuppose that there isn't a Creator because you don't believe something is created? I see a building, a assume there was an architect and builder. That is my point. You believe that nothing created/formed/made/produced everything. That is also a presupposition, but it is disingenuous. The truth is that people don't want to believe in a God, because then we would be held morally accountable for all the sin in our life. Atheism allows us to make god in our image. Therefore nothing is wrong and there is no reason to argue about it. Why would you argue about something when there is no ultimate meaning to it?
Chris Young How did the volcano get there in the first place?
All of this is absolutely amazing. If I weren't a believer in Christ, I'd be convinced watching this series.
You set the bar for critical thinking far too low.
@@profphilbell2075 Maybe or maybe not.
Amazing, praise God
@@profphilbell2075 it's called faith and reasoning. I don't have to see something to know it exists or it's true. I've seen more in my life than anyone would understand and it's all God.
And if you’re a true believer of Christ you must watch Tovia Singer’s Isaiah 53 video, you’’ll love it! G-d bless you 🤗
“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools,”
(Rom. 1:20-22 NKJV)
Amen!! Amen and Amen!!!!
Amen !
Why would an all loving being require that we worship them? It's soooo egotistical!
@@bluenose7984
He never told nobody, you mast warship Him.
Who you love , you warship too.
But one rebel love only himself and nobody ellse.
This person is really egoistic .
By the way ,do you love your parents ?
@@no-yp4ts Worship is not love, we love our family and friends but this being needs to be worshipped which is fanatical love!
Dr. Robert Carter is incredibly moving in this series. His wisdom and faith blows me away. This series lead me to Dr. Stephen Meyers too. These two scientists supercharge my Faith.
Gods intelligence is beyond comprehension. He created all this for our enjoyment. We sinned against him and then in the richness of his grace came to earth to die for us. 1 Corinthians 2:9. What no eye has seen, nor ear heard,
nor the heart of man imagined,
what God has prepared for those who love him” Wow just wow.
@@maylingng4107 With respect, your argument ignores God's Omniscient character. God knew all of this would happen from the beginning, and He prophesied Jesus' coming right off the bat in Genesis 3:15. The bad things that happen are a result of allowing free will. God created everything good (Genesis 1:31), but then Adam and Eve decided to rebel against God, seek to "be like God," and follow Satan (Genesis 3:5) and trust in a lie rather than their Creator. You still see this kind of behavior today. I don't have enough faith to believe that fish evolve into philosophers, you are cousin to a banana, and entire universes can pop into existence at any moment.
"They perish because they *refused to love the truth* and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a *powerful delusion* so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who *have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness* ." (2 Thessalonians 2:10-12)
God created all of the problems you see on earth when he cast Satan down to the earth alone with all of his followers and still to this day he / she hasn't been able to clean that mess up. There is no question about who's running the earth 😀
@@analyst1777 The problem is that Adam and Eve made a free will choice to rebel against God, follow Satan, and trust in a lie, and it is through their sin that our nature became corrupt. What do you mean God "hasn't been able to clean that mess up" - He is in control and you can't do anything unless He allows you to (Genesis 3:5). If God is Holy and Just then He has to punish sin, and He will... but the reason He allows evil to continue to exist in the world temporarily is because you are evil, and He delayed Judgment Day to give you a chance to repent. You are very fortunate. "But God is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish, but for all to reach repentance" (2 Peter 3:9).
@@michael9237 If you erased satan from the Genesis story there isn't any logical reason to believe mankind would have ever fell. There would be no lie and they would have never even known evil. The book of Enoch even teaches what fallen evils fallen angels taught mankind I will agree with you somewhat he is in control in the sense that Satan has to get permission to convince people to rape, murder, cause war, sickness and destroy the Earth from God just like in the story of Job.
@@analyst1777 Not every act of evil originates from Satan nor the fallen angelic host. Evil also originates from the free will of those who choose to do wickedly, e.g. not every murder originates from Satan as people can freely choose to murder from their own impulses.. The importance of the Millennial Reign of Christ in the present creation at the end of the age is a necessity for in that time (era) Christ will reign supreme over fallen and redeemed humans while Satan and the fallen host are bound. At the end of the reign Satan will be unbound and there will still be those who choose of their free will driven by their desires in opposition to Christ to follow Satan thus negating the Devil made me do it (I am a product of my environment) mentality which seeks to place the blame elsewhere but upon one's self.
I've watched your movie repeatedly... probably 50 times... I'm watching it again right now... Thanks!!!!
I didn't think anyone had seen it more than me. That might count.
You must check out Brian Nickels Hydroplate theory here on UA-cam. It's an amazing look at the evidence from a scientific approach. It's a 6 part vid you can't miss it.
@@ourlifeinwashington4114 Sounds awesome... thanks
Have you seen
Evolutions Achilles Heel by ICR?
@@knightclan4 no but I'm about too. Tyvm
Great work! Very professional and good editing. Thanks for your efforts to educate!
Our pleasure! We're so glad you enjoyed our film!
Notice something! Exhaustive observations?
Ohhhh science?
" Hebrew. "My expert has, after all his experiences and observations and explanations deep thoughts that influenced his mind. The wow factor that is the science.
Thankyou Lord for the wow factor and ability to be after so many years to be impressed anew.
Thankyou Lord for my friend Noel Weeks who went through so much to have the privilege to study Hebrew ancient and modern. That over his life felt the need to write down despite all opposition and You Lord made his zeal possible
I'm very late in appreciation for his efforts because he's long buried and in that place prepared for him to wait for You Lord.
Thankyou Lord for Life and the wow factor I experience daily.
WOW factor
Wow! Like a glass of cold water on a hot day, this documentary is really refreshing in this world that's progressively turning against God and becoming so spiritually lost and losing its grip on reality. Very professional, good production that's not stale or monotone, challenging the naturalist and evolutionist worldview, and providing feasible evidence supported in every field of science from geology, microbiology, paleontology, biology, etc. Great work!! ❤👍🏾
I agree, I just watched it with my husband. Wow..it leaves us speechless for now. We are even more impressed by the countless puzzle pieces that fit into each other so perfectly🥲. (Blessings from The Netherlands)
Fantastic production, thank you!
Had me believing them millions of years in school and after but now at 66 years young I believe in six day creation and the great flood! Praise God he opened my eyes to the truth just like he said! Seek and you will find!
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 HaHaHa you are a funny person! You have been decieved just like I was and talking dillusional! God created it in six literal days in bc time we now live in ad time in a matter of about 7000 years old and Jesus will return soon to prove it as we are in the days of Noah!
@@zaney1956 No. There is no scientific evidence of that. None.
are you jooo ish?
@@danielthomas5212 White American!
Amen brother
I came across this documentary a few years back and wished that I had recorded it. Now is back and I am doing just that, for future reference. Thanks for uploading it again.
Please show me how I may record it to watch later. I am elderly.
@@rosefenton3005 There may be a way to record but I use a software that I purchased. Sorry.
@@javiermgtaoism5702 What is the software, stuff like this is invaluable, but I have a lot of gray hair so it has to be relatively simple, thanks in advance.
@@robertashcraft1360 I am not an advertiser and hope it will not be interpreted as spam. The software is called 'Wondershare Uniconverter'. It costs about 39 US dollars for a years subscription. I have downloaded hundreds of videos and movies with it.
Please pay the Author guys, Thou Shalt Not Steal.
Fascinating..something so complex explained as ABC.. Love it ❤
This is by far the BEST documentary I have ever watched!! And to all evoloutionist, what say you now
@@maylingng4107 I have one for you...Does evoloution stop?
FYI, not all scientists believe in that crap. CRAP =evoloution. Im a Herpetologist, even. For crying out loud, I would never let the world know I was a "Biologists " and use Evoloution in the same sentence. Biologists should know more than everyone, its impossible, given the complexity of the human anatomy. Go check out Kent Hovind on youtube.
@@sidirmusic she may have bought her PHD from Darwin the Mr Apes universe. And she may ended to become Apes by evolution that never stop🤭 (if keep studying skull with brains of Apes)
What do evolutionists say now ? BOLLOCKS !
@@sidirmusic Evolution NEVER stops .
Marvelous--You made compelling evidence for the hx of Creation and the Flood--thank you so much--another Bible reader and servant of God
Enjoying this on a rainy afternoon. I have watched it many times, and it fills me with joy every time. Thank you for producing this!
Helen, here is another piece of evidence that corroborates Genesis, and I hope you find it of interest:
Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there?
For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things).
Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. *The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood.* If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.
@@michael9237 Wow!! I didn’t know any of those details. I am a card carrying Christian would you email that to me? I’ll send it when you respond back just don’t want to have my email out there.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 You sir have over a thousand posts on this channel. Seems to me that you are on a mission. What else do you do during the day other than hate God for creating you??
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 I left you a longer comment and question on another post but quickly as a Scientist how then does soft tissue last for millions and of years in Dinosaur bones in the wild in extreme conditions?
@@Captain-Awesome Amen !!! You have to keep in mind that his Father is Satan and he will live in Hell with him if he doesn't repent.
Thanks!
Thank you so much for all the effort, time, and money that was put into this film. God bless you all.
That is, If he exist
@Jake Lloyd free will
@Jake Lloyd non, we follow scientific facts
@@joelbachmann10 It is not scientific fact if it is not repeatable. "Replenish the earth" says God.
@@fredkilian4049
--- You must be a scientist. What is your specialty?
God bless you Sir. God created the world is 6 days, there was a real flood, and judgement is real. Thank you Lord Jesus.
Sir, that's your religious literalist beliefs. Not based in history or science. I'm fine with you having beliefs, but there is literally zero evidence for a six day creation nor Noah's ark and the flood, but there's evidence against these stacking all the way to the moon and back.
I had this view, but to see this in so much detail and clearly is amazing. Thanks🙏🙇 for the upload and God bless🙏
Hubby and I are Seventh-day Adventists, wanted to watch a good Creation video, and found this. MANY thanks for such an organized and stunningly beautiful presentation.
I did as well‼️I’m a born again believer & have watched a UA-cam channel called “Hope Through Prophecy,” which is basically 7th Day Adventist, & have learned a great deal. After reading through quite a few mostly negative comments posted here, l was immediately uplifted when l got to yours & read it❗️l found this video well-presented & very enjoyable. CHECK THIS OUT ➡️ UA-cam has an official trailer for the new Biblically based movie called “THE ARK & THE DARKNESS,” being released 3/20&21/2024 & shown in select theaters around the country (dates may vary, depending on your location). May God richly bless you & your husband‼️
Me too. It is a pity the presenters don't understand that the Universe is much older than the surface of this earth. The comment in day 4 is an aside (He made the stars also). It does not state that the stars were spoken into existence on Day 4 of the creation week.
This is the best audio quality I've ever heard on my little laptop! THANK YOU!!
Is the earth..flat ? Since curvature can't be proven
God now says in the Bible, " No more water, but fire next time". Pepole, get right with God like Noah did.
A major flood just ravaged Europe.
This is also a scare tactic, and eagerly awaiting a glorious conflagration to overtake the world and bring on the ruination of civilization isn't moral - it's wicked.
@@BowlerScott Yet you can not deny 3.5 million square miles of sand in the Sahara desert.
Amd Yellowstone has been having higher then normal earthquakes lately and the magma has been rising. I wouldn't b surprised if it erupted soon. Also Germany and the area of rhe Rhine River is flooded. We r in some interesting times. Get right with God
@@BowlerScott The deadly and devastating floods in Germany and Belgium are tiny compared to the global flood which wiped out nearly all of humanity.
Look around this is water and fire
Joel: 2: 28-32
A POURING OUT OF GOD'S SPIRIT.
And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: And also upon the servants and upon the handmaids in those days will i pour out my spirit. And i will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood and fire and pillars of smoke. The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the Lord come. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be delivered:
This life isn't all there is, Heaven and Hell are very real. If you will confess your sins to Jesus Christ with a genuine heart and ask him to save you, he will save you and he will show you that he is real. Don't leave it to late. Once you take your last breath it's a done deal. God Bless
JESUS NEVER EXISTED
WHICH GOD? THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF THEM.
@@neilreinhardt556 I pray that you find Jesus ❤️🙏
Watched the DVD last night. Outstanding! Glad it's on UA-cam; saved it as the first video in my UA-cam 5 Star Documentaries playlist.
Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic.
He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on.
The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north.
In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin"
The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind"
The sun is "The light of the World"
The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea.
"He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays.
Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo.
The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass.
The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12.
The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30.
The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes.
The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected.
The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe.
In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens.
Jesus is a fictional allegory for the sun. Christianity is ancient astrology. It's just fables about the sun.
Check out Acharya S aka D.M Murdock for more info.
.. .. .
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 so, Alessandro cites two ideas that challenge the "evolution myth", and you immediately misrepresent his argument to say that he meant to use these ideas to support "Young Earth Creationism". you are disingenuous, a deceiver and an over-educated fool who wastes time responding to people to whom he supposes to condescend.
if, indeed, you are well educated why not concisely explain why evolution is not a "myth"? you know, how it is that evolution is not a traditional story, concerning early history or explaining some natural phenomenon, involving supernatural beings or events?
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 so to be clear here's what i believe: i believe you are a poor logician and a disingenuous arguer. incapable of responding to direct questions, you posit suppositions regarding those whose logic and inquiry you are ill-prepared to answer. in short, you are an internet troll according to the current vernacular.
my "place to begin" is right here. rather than pontificating about your puesdo-scientific dogma and citing irrelevant gov't support for your dogma, why don't you address my original question. define "evolution" as you wish to consider it here, and then explain how it is not a "myth" as i have defined it previously.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 evolution is only a theory. in fact, I read in an article that it’s disproved by the second law of thermodynamics
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Nicholas!! My favourite grandson's name. Having said that, I do agree with you and your knowledge. It fascinates me right from the earliest beginnings of earth. Through no fault of mine, I was raised in a religious cult. I was rebellious and disagreeable. Something inside of me as a youth said, " It ain't necessarily so." Pardon the grammar. Long story shortened, my family, Mother, Father and 5 siblings were thrown out of the cult with a box of food and nowhere to live.
Godly people doing godly cleansing?????
Now I am almost 80 years old ☺️.
I aknowledge parts of the Bible in it's historical information. But........ Way off hundreds of thousands of years in many other respects.
The guy with the navy blue sweater and blue jeans is talking TWADDLE. Where is his proof? No offense.
Everything old is new again... amazing how science of old can be explained to be a newer occurrence by the explanation of layers of earth being formed by water, heat and cooling with the water subsiding, retreating, and not taking an extreme amount of time such as millions or more of years to do so in a miniscule amount of time compared to that being anywhere from a mere generation to just a few generations. Incredible!
There is no evidence of a great flood that covered the entire world. The entire world of a small group of people in a localized area, sure. There is NO evidence that it was just a generation to a few generations. ALL evidence points to millions and billions of years. I want to see the erosion that created the Grand Canyon happen in just a few generations. It cannot, and did not.
What a fantastic example of truth. So well done, I think I’m going to watch it again.
God is GREAT !!
I agree. We are all *Uncritically Indoctrinated* into an Atheistic-Naturalist worldview (abiogenesis, particles to man evolution, etc.), but praise God that some are still capable of critical thinking and can see beyond the indoctrination. Science is a methodology. Atheistic-Naturalism is an Ideology. Science and Naturalism are not the same thing. This is a matter of competing worldviews over the same evidence and you have to evaluate the worldviews to determine which one more rationally handles the evidence. For example, *did you know that atheistic-Naturalists unavoidably have to invoke Supernatural phenomena in order to "naturally" (atheistically) explain our universe, most of them just aren't aware of it?*
The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...*
The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality).
And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview.
Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent, and *all of the best evidences of evolution can also be explained by Genesis 1-12.*
And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just don't know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias.
Those things I pointed out are not "science" (a methodology) - they are part of the Atheistic-Naturalist worldview (an ideology)... it's a religion. *Did you know that the Theory of Evolution (and atheistic-Naturalism in general) shares characteristics of a religion?* Not just saying that, it's a fact.
In Arkansas, a 1982 federal court ruled that Creationism can't be taught in schools because "it is not falsifiable." With its history of rewriting itself every time we discover a new problem with it, what would it take to "falsify" evolution today? Maybe hundreds of Living fossils? Or allegedly millions of year extinct creatures still alive today? Finding fully developed vertebrates in the Cambrian explosion? Discovering that numerous vestigial (leftover) organs actually have a normal purpose, like the appendix? Finding an alleged 70 million year extinct evolutionary predecessor to land-dwelling mammals still alive today with no signs of evolution (the Coelacanth)? Young soft tissues in a growing number of dinosaur fossils that appear similar to 4000 year old mummies and the Tyrolean ice man? *Did you know that secular scientists recently debunked evolutionist claims of "junk DNA"?*
Or should we just reinterpret all of these problematic evidences *in order to sustain the Atheistic-Naturalist belief in abiogenesis and evolution?* Is this really how "science" (a methodology) is supposed to work, or is this more about your agenda of attempting to explain our origins without God?
In contrast to modern evolutionists, Charles Darwin met the gold standard of modern science and gave a testable hypothesis for the validity of his theory, saying "if an *organ* were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down..." and he didn't have access to the fields of genetics or microbiology when he made up his theory. *If evolution is true, then how did male and female evolve?* Now be careful, the usual evolutionist rescuing devices of "algae," "asexual organisms," "alleles," and "populations" just don't answer the question here - you have to explain the critical *organs* in these separate, yet interdependent, precision tuned "all or nothing" biological systems "by numerous, successive, slight modifications."
Going backwards in the evolutionary narrative, which of these critical organs do you gradually reduce first? And if they did evolve "by numerous, successive, slight modifications" then which gender evolved first and how did it reproduce while the other hadn't evolved yet?
*"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"* (Romans 3:23)
*"The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them."* (Romans 1:18-19)
Definition of Science: "the intellectual and practical *activity encompassing the systematic study* of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through *observation and experiment."* [ie. a methodology]
Definition of Naturalism: "the *philosophical belief that everything arises from natural properties and causes,* and *supernatural or spiritual explanations are excluded* or discounted." Science and Naturalism are demonstrably not the same thing. You are erroneously conflating the two. QED Indeed.
Mikley appears keen to present his ignorance on science all over these threads.
*The ETERNAL GOD would do anything for you!!*
Even out of love for you he went to the cross as a human!!
Philippians 2:5-8
Thank you!!!!
Really appreciated that the presenter posed 'mainstream' challenges to the presenters..and they explained their positions... If the corona virus has taught me anything... is that keeping an ear out for what others are saying and investigating it is the best course of action.
Superbly presented show. High quality. Succinct. Appreciated
@@bartbannister394 I would be very interested in reading any book you could recommend considering the discrepancies in age of these dating methods which I found to be a perplexing issue as I continue to investigate. Thanks!
Yes
Great description; i agree with your commebt
Apocalyptic: We can't see the forest for the trees. It is too great for a closed mind, to grasp.
@John Monday So,You are against vaccine? Then You can go out and hug and pat some rabies dogs.
@John Monday Agree. After this comment, more information is coming out. This particular "vaccine" is certainly setting a precedent.
Thank you so very much. this movie has answered so many questions, and confirmed what I believe through the bible . What amazes me is that the Holy Spirit reveals lots of information to us who are not scientists, and now we have documented evidence. God bless you all.
Anyone sucked in by this please talk to a sane scientist, or to aa psychologist or even a friend. It is a classic example of pseudo science which is unattached to reality. They are like early people who believed in a flat earth. This time it is a ‘young earth’, my god,no explanation of the neanderthal man moving to homo sapiens, and from hunters and gatherers to agricultural which is all so well documented by scientists all over the world. Please believe in religion and God in your own sense but please do not believe these backyard American scientists. Please recall that it is only Americans that have a problem with evolution.
@VideoAudioDisco09 The rape story is not an endorsement of it just a historical story, details matter. Spontaneous generation of life has zero evidence, Its just a neurotic fantasy to avoid feeling guilty.
@VideoAudioDisco09 atheists believe life accidentally arose.
@VideoAudioDisco09 There is no natural explanation, that's the problem, it requires outside intervention with power and inteligence. Atheism is not rational.
@VideoAudioDisco09 All the experiments you mentioned disproving spontaneous generation prove it cant work back in the day. Proof of a god or gods existing is simple, Creation exists therefore it was created. The complexity of an ecosystem accidentally occurring is beyond belief. Now you can believe in that if you dont try and pretend your using science and rationality. Atheists in my own town put up a billboard claming to be supported by science. That's the selling point if the system. This movie gives a rational system but one I reject based on the time factor, it needs refutation not moronic mockery.
"Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it."
I loved this. I'm totally on board with the message & have been for a long time but I really appreciated the sensitive, respectful approach.
None of it is true, John. That doesn't bother you?
Lot of trolls telling us there is not God and it is not a creation and they say the Bible is all lies,, well they will find out in the end.. And they are still trying to say we are living on a spinning ball.. But how would you measure sea level on a round ball,, get out a globe and figure out where the high pint is on it,,, where is sea level..?
@Philip Carpenter Don't worry they know.?
@@nicholaschristie-blick4516 did you watch the documentary? Saying something isn't true doesn't make it not true. Perhaps the notion of a God bothers you?
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 baffling you refuse to be informed. I'm willing to bet none of you even watched this documentary halfway through yet eager to attack those that did. Perhaps you are trolls that need to be off and watching your favorite Dawkins video?
Wow this is so well done. Very encouraged. God bless you all for using your gifts to serve the church. Thank you.
Question #4 If it is true that the sedimentary layers which contain the fossils were formed in “minutes or even seconds” wouldn’t if follow that every species of living organisms which lived in that day be in all the layers and not confined to one or maybe two of them?
Their source is: trust me bro.
They are found everywhere. If you’re asking why every organism isn’t in every single burial site that’s because every organism didn’t live in every square mile of the planet. Ecosystem destruction, remember
Skazki
@erick289777
Oooo. You sure got us. You're a quite enlightened talking ape
does a turtle run as fast as a horse?
Absolutely exciting, uplifting and glorious presentation of our marvelous and mighty God!!! ❤❤❤🥰
Which god? Gods were invented before modern communications exist ed. Someone showed up with a fantastical story and there was no way to disprove it.
Pastor: a profession that will keep the rent paid and food on the table. It helps if you're a great story teller.
Have you ever seen anybody rise from the dead? Cure the blind? Do you know anybody who has?
@@Keving3 Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *Time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people?
Yup @@michaelg377
@@Keving3 I appreciate your honesty. Let me ask you something your belief system: *What are your thoughts on the Faint Young Sun Paradox?* Scientists observe that our sun is slowly warming up as hydrogen fuses into helium, and at this observed rate, 3.5B years ago our sun would have been 30% fainter and earth would have been frozen solid as a result (if it was really billions of years old). The problem is that atheistic-evolutionists believe that 3.5B years ago chemicals fizzed by chance in a puddle to form all the necessary proteins required for life - in what would have been a global, dead, frozen environment - hence the "paradox." *How do you handle this observable evidence?*
*"Liquid water is generally considered a key ingredient for life. When the Sun was much fainter, the Earth with its present atmospheric composition would have been frozen solid. If the oceans were frozen, life may not have formed" (Quote: NASA).*
A) Biblical Creation proponents happily accept this measurable scientific evidence - it's not a "paradox" at all because the earth isn't billions of years old, and life didn't create itself by chance from a puddle of chemicals, we were intentionally created. This makes sense because there is zero evidence that our earth was ever frozen solid as it should have been if it was really billions of years old, and also zero evidence of an early greenhouse gas atmosphere or other atheistic miracle warming effect to help sustain the atheistic belief in abiogenesis.
B) Atheistic-Naturalists (evolutionists, etc.) however have a problem, because you need billions of years of deep time to make it seem less implausible that chemicals can fizz into people, and that life atheistically created itself. So you have to invoke some kind of a miracle warming effect with no evidence like an early alleged greenhouse gas atmosphere, or various implausible celestial phenomena. Not only do these excuses have zero evidence, but they are also incredibly implausible - because if you did have an early greenhouse gas atmosphere 3.5B years ago, you have to believe that it countered the faint young sun's temperature just right (not too hot like Venus, yet not cold like Mars) and it had to dissipate in perfect inverse proportion to the gradual warming of the sun over time - *all just to make atheistic abiogenesis and early evolution seem less scientifically problematic.*
Two worldviews, same evidences, two very different interpretations. Which one is being more "scientific," the one that just accepts the evidence, or the one that has to fabricate implausible and evidence-less excuses to *circumvent this problematic scientific evidence and sustain their already scientifically-problematic belief that puddles can fizz into people?*
Any thoughts?
*"The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse"* (Romans 1:20)
Excellent work.... That only scratches the surface of the complexity of the true God's creation - Each topic covered could be another documentary of equal or greater length. That's part of the awesome nature of God's creation - it takes more than a lifetime to fully grasp each topic. This is where faith comes into play. I greatly credit the producer for utilizing practicing expert testimony to solidify God's word. Pick the topic(s) that most stimulate you and seek the truth and it will be revealed to you - that is what I myself have found through my own research to the point that I myself no longer question the word but now truly marvel at it.
@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 You can trash the billions of years as most dating methods gives a young world. Helium in atmosphere, Helium in ground, Meteor dust, Buildup of carbon 14, Human population, Natural plutonium, Sodium in sea, Sediment in sea, Erosion of continents, Earth's magnetic field, Oil leaks in earth, Natural gas in earth, Orphan radiohalos, Decay of rock magnetism, Tight bends in rocks, Coral reef growth, Oldest living plants, Human civilizations, River delta growth, Undersea oil seepage, Uranium in sea, Rotation of spiral galaxies, Decay of comets, Dust on the moon, Slowing of earth's rotation, Heat loss from earth, Niagara Falls erosion and many more
Go ahead and try to refute any of these.
Thank you so much for the kind words, @toddashley407! We are actually in the final stages of producing a follow-up film to this one called 𝘔𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘈𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥, which will soon be available for pre-order. By signing up at this link, you will receive an email notification you as soon as the pre-order goes live: mailchi.mp/isgenesishistory.com/pre-order
only brainwashed people believe this
I only commenting here because my space is blocked. We are not the center of the universe we are no the only species of humanoids to have existed. We are not the only planet that has total eclipses. Every thing that was created was by mutation from cells of reproductions restoring the earth to its former glory. Humans came from another planet and we were an interplanetary species. God exists today, but we are all our own creators of our own destiny. That is where free will came to be. Although some people need to be encouraged for overcoming challenges 1:23:25
We came from another planet. And we are the third ir fourth series of planetary creation from dna strands. 1:24:38
Buenísimo, buenísimo, buenísimo. Gracias, muchas gracias. God bless you!!!
Wishing everyone who marks this day, a very Blessed Good Friday. A day where Christians around the word commemorate the ultimate sacrifice, so that amid despair and despondency, hope and forgiveness may be found.
Ah yes, when Jesus tell his disciples (Mark 7,1-15) that it isn't necessary to wash hands or utensils before eating, he either wasn't aware of the creatures he created called microbes that cause disease or he had a plan that includes many people dying in horrific ways! What a merciful savior!?
@tsimahei Jesus spoke of hand washing as if it were unimportant. Unless you can site some passages wherein he tells his followers the necessity of hand washing for health, then he either really didn't know that dirty hands can spread disease, or didn't care.
@Oallcm Dsoner
What "sacrifice"?
"He" "sacrifices" "himself" to "himself" as a loop hole to forgive "himself" from "his" own mistakes and three days later "he" supposedly is alive again.....
What "sacrifice" are you talking about?!?...
@tsimahei You have reports of "resurrections"?.....
Amen glory to God!
Wonderfully done! Gonna share this with a few friends. We LOVE the Grand Canyon and driving out west. You put everything into words I try explaining to my wife lol
This is cosmically amazing. Quite possibly the greatest film I have ever seen. Thank God that academia is beginning to see.
August Dog ...you need to get out more, and maybe read a few books (other than the Bible) because your scientific outlook seems to be rather narrow and foreshortened. Jus’ sayin’.
@neverindoubt You weren't paying attention to the paleontologist, the biologist, the anthropologist with PhD degrees challenging the current paradigm... "Forever Learning but unable to come to a fuller knowledge of the truth" Bible 101
@neverindoubt So you'd rather discard all the observable evidence based on just that?
I could not agree more! So grateful that I was led to watch it.
@@fredricthomas6654 “You weren't paying attention to the paleontologist, the biologist, the anthropologist with PhD degrees”
They don't deserve to be paid attention to. Because they are wrong at best, And liars at worst, Liars working to line their own pockets and the pockets of the religious universities and religious organizations they work for. Because those are the ONLY palaces they can make a living abusing and misusing science. Real scientists reject anything these guys are espousing as impossible.
Ted Kaczynski had a PHD in mathematics. Has any reputable mathematician ever quoted his works?
“ challenging the current paradigm”
Thats funny! Its better called “flying in the face of scientific facts”. They aren't challenging anything except sanity and reason. Even the Catholic church disagrees with them.
Absolutely NO serious, reputable scientist supports young earth creationists beliefs, no matter how many PHDs they have been granted to misuse.
Education without intelligence is just indoctrination. The beauty of religion is It requires no evidence. Only blind faith. Take 1 baby. Add 15 years of daily indoctrination. Reinforce with a promise of eternal damnation for bad behavior and an eternity of bliss for good behavior spent with the loved ones you have lost in life . What you get is a selective disregard for facts and belief in the unbelievable.
@13:37, having been through typhoon haiyan in 2013 and been in the middle of a storm surge, believe me, one would not doubt the power and scale and how quickly water can change a landscape. 😐 definitely, lots and lots of water in a short amount of time. Made me think, 'This must be a glimpse into the great flood in Noah's time...'
Dare i say, even the winds sounded like angels on chariots.
wow!!!! this is just what i needed. thanks for this wonderful and beautifully made content
Thank you for creating this film! Very good and faith promoting.
I am certain promoting faith was the idea ...and had little to do with objectivity or truth.
unfortunately, promoting faith, isn't science more important than believing?
@@joteirlinck4778 Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers? Science is a methodology; what you're talking about is an Ideology, that's not "science," that's something else. Let me ask you this... As an evolutionist, *how do you believe male and female evolved?* Charles Darwin gave a testable hypothesis for the validity of his theory, saying "if an organ were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down..." and he didn't have access to the fields of genetics or microbiology when he made up his theory. *If evolution is true, then how did male and female evolve?*
Before you answer, consider that we're talking about *two separate, yet interdependent sets of organs* that had to evolve "by numerous, successive, slight modifications" (Darwin) and which are precision tuned with numerous single-points of failure. You have to explain the *organs* in keeping with this testable hypothesis. For example:
The fallopian tubes are lined with millions of these little hairs that all wave the same direction, and their purpose is to guide the egg from the ovaries down into the uterus. If they stood still, laid flat, waved the wrong direction, or didn't exist - the egg would either die or it would implant in the fallopian tube thus killing the mother. Some of these are known medical conditions that prevent pregnancy - "Evolution" had to get these millions of hairs just right.... "by numerous, successive, slight modifications."
*Simultaneously* the sperm has a whip like rotor, a motor encasing, a bushing like material, a nutrient transfer system, and several other components that all have to be working *just right* or the sperm can't find the egg. Reproduction and life fails. "Evolution" had to get the interdependent parts of the sperm "just right" ... "by numerous, successive, slight modifications."
*Then* you have the placenta which does everything for the baby including keeping the mother's and baby's blood separate, the expanding and contracting uterus and cervix, the mechanism which only allows one sperm into the egg, and numerous other components that all had to be *designed* just right, or reproduction and life fails. "Evolution" had to *SIMULTANEOUSLY* get all of these just right "by numerous, successive, slight modifications."
Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other hadn't evolved yet? And going backwards in time, which of these critical organs do you gradually reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications" while still enabling functional reproduction?
*'So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them."* (Genesis 1:27)
awesome! best documentary I have seen in years. thanks for uploading this.
In the '80s, Lake Powel was at capacity and they had to open the spillways to lower the water level. They were tunnels cut into the rock to pass water around the Glen Canyon dam. When they closed them weeks later and engineers inspected the tunnels, they were amazed at the erosion in the rock walls. This is the power of water.
Ah, a dam in a place of easily eroded sandstone, known for being easily and rapidly eroded is what exactly?
Do you suppose all strata behave that way?
@@ozowen Cavitation will pulverize any rock when flowing at least 100ft/sec.
@@SirDeanosity
"Any rock"?
So is there a reason why the supposed Grand Canyon impact is not seen everywhere?
Oh wait- there isn't.
So the comment means what exactly?
@@ozowen It seems your question was answered and yet you pontificate and avoid the answer, which was correct but it didn't back your wrong bias. A global flood would provide the cataclysmic evidence we see today. Science without the bias shows this to be true. Your bias does not change truth but you knew that. There's this thing called a search engine, it will help your vain misconceptions be righted.
@@chrislachat459
The dam in question is placed on highly porous rocks subject to cavitation and easy erosion. Feel free to explain how that is the same as all rock.
Reasons why there is no global flood at any time in recent history.
1) No flood strata. After any large flood event, in particular ones where there is tumultuous movement, currents, collisions of currents, concurrent tectonic activity- then any unstable strata are forced into the water, strata destroyed and the resultant strata after everything has settles tends to cruder layering in flood order (sand silt clay). We should see that globally- we do not.
2) Any aerial strata cannot be anywhere in the so called flood sedimentary layers. We have a global one plus plenty of local and regional ones all through the geo strata
3) No dry layers should be anywhere- yet there are also plenty of them.
4) Fragile laminae such as those found in varve strata have no business being in such sediment. Too fragile to survive such activity, especially since they are almost always adjacent to mountains (which were supposedly thrust up in the flood). These are biennial strata and can be manually counted- going uninterrupted, globally, hundreds of thousands or millions of years. They should not even exist.
5) Fossils should always be in muddled order. Drowned carcasses only sink to the bottom when the water is very cold. But the rapid thrust of water from the deep means the water (and air btw) get superheated by the kinetic energy alone.
6) No clear sedimentary strata for the period should exist anywhere near the upthrust mountain ranges. But they predominate.
There is much more of course, but that's a start
This morning, I thought about what the evolutionists say about the neanderthals and how they, somehow, turned into the present humans. I admit I did not have the answer to their claim, but I know the Bible doesn't make a mistake. Then, somehow, as if God had directed me to your video, the answer to the question I had this morning was answered. What an amazing God we have. He cares about what we think. Thanks for sharing your video. God bless you, sir.
Evolutionists dont say Neanderthals turned into present humans
how do you know the bible makes no mistakes?even if there was a flood,why do you put it down to a god, noah and an ark.
It's not turned, it evolved, plus neanderthals were a different species with a common ancestor.
@@cesarepelaschier4829 The central, and most important fact of the Bible is God's plan for redeeming the human race from sin. This plan's most crucial point was when God incarnated, became a man known as Jesus and eventually paid the punishment for our sins, then rose from the dead.
Jesus gave testimony to the historicity of the flood, and the God inspired nature of the Bible. His resurrection is the single most important fact of history, and proves his divinity. If He gave testimony to the divinely inspired nature of the Bible, then that's what is true.
@@consul6262 No, they didn't evolve into humans. They were humans, albeit with some differences compared to the average human today, but still well within the genetic range of diversity of human beings.
Our amazing powerful God can do anything He wants and that includes creating this old blue ball we live on just as He tells us in Genesis! He is awesome and I'm glad I know Him and His Son Jesus!
Thank you so much for making this available!!! So grateful for this amazing documentary! What a blessing. Sharing. . .
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
RSV
Only-monos
God-theos
Monos theos
Monotheism
The Father
Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)!
Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God!
Jesus has a God!
Jesus died!
God can’t die!
God raised Jesus from the dead!
This is an exceptional documentary. Not sure how I stumbled upon this but I'm thankful I did!
it's all false, though
@@snlescaille I's actually being serious without trying to sound too serious. Sorry you mistook that for _trolling._
@@BorisNoiseChannel oh, excuse us for not being gullible. Keep your blindfold on, and dont say we didnt tell you the truth.
@@derrickdawes7598 You're the one believing something, here. Not me. (or in other words: you, calling me gullible for NOT believing certain claims, makes no sense at all).
I believe something as true, if it can be demonstrated to be (most likely) true, and not because a guy called Derrick TELLS me it's _"the truth"._ That's what gullible people do, taking others on their word.
@@BorisNoiseChannel
The evidence supports this video. The burden of proving it wrong is on you......
Thank you so much for giving glory to God!! ❤️🙏
Very cool that this doc has 5 million views already in less than 4 years.