Quantum Physics: The Laws That Govern Our Universe [4K] | The Secrets of Quantum Physics | Spark

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,1 тис.

  • @christorres3487
    @christorres3487 5 місяців тому +30

    Jim Al-Khalili makes complicated topics easy to understand.

  • @Redishprint
    @Redishprint Рік тому +56

    For the first time in my life i understood the Double slit theory, for the first time in my life i understood something about Quantum physics. I love watching this type of documentaries without never understanding a damn thing, don´t ask me why, heh. The man in this video explains it so slow and well. Thank you so much

    • @greywolfsmith4089
      @greywolfsmith4089 3 місяці тому +2

      Agree 100% it makes it enjoyable for dummies like us

  • @michellekeith5602
    @michellekeith5602 2 роки тому +111

    I agree with the comment below. I've practically studied my way into degrees on here. The beauty of life is magnified when coupled with knowledge. The fact that the morning glories opened with the rising sun always gave a smile. Now , the process and it's reasoning are no longer a secret to me, but instead it's more of a connection to the secret world around me . A Spark in the abyss🤗❤️

    • @peterplotts1238
      @peterplotts1238 2 роки тому +5

      The spark overcomes the abyss. Well said.

    • @joelight956
      @joelight956 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@peterplotts1238

    • @peterplotts1238
      @peterplotts1238 2 роки тому +1

      "Well said." was a reference to your comment. The rest was my tag-along expression of agreement.

    • @shahriarshad1065
      @shahriarshad1065 2 роки тому

      @@peterplotts1238 0

    • @peterplotts1238
      @peterplotts1238 2 роки тому +1

      @@shahriarshad1065 "0"? I will say this for you, you are a man of few numbers and no words. What do you mean?

  • @signwatcher007
    @signwatcher007 Рік тому +106

    Twenty - six years of learning , being taught by some of the brightest minds most diverse people on the planet ,,so many professors , Doctors, great teachers that i lost track of the number years ago . I want to bring to everyone's attention this magnificent man teaching us today,his abilities to get a message across to us is nothing short of amazing,my hat is off to you sir , Trust me i've had enough teachers to know who is the very best ,you get that award hands down .,thank you for putting forth the effort ,i know you did.

    • @Syphirioth
      @Syphirioth Рік тому +5

      Context is everything. That why media don't like put things in context these days.

    • @BiggggggggggggggggE
      @BiggggggggggggggggE Рік тому

      5hànx

    • @IchorX
      @IchorX Рік тому

      I can't say I believe that at all, unless English isn't your first language or you typed this with your toes. I don't think you get through 26 years of serious education being satisfied with writing like this; which doctor or professor was so diverse they used two commas and a seizure of spaces? I mean, it's legible, but it's definitely hard to take someone seriously when they're claiming to have been educated by some of the "brightest minds on the planet," yet they still write with poorer grammar than a bonobo on hard drugs.

    • @vernedavis5856
      @vernedavis5856 5 місяців тому

      yes,sir!

    • @enrecia7
      @enrecia7 3 місяці тому

      A

  • @pablodaproducer8507
    @pablodaproducer8507 Рік тому +21

    This was the most understanding I've ever gotten about quantum physics from one video ..thank you

  • @thereindeertherabbitthebat592
    @thereindeertherabbitthebat592 Рік тому +60

    This is GREAT. It's hard to believe that knowledge such as this is immediately available for us to enjoy, anytime we wish, wherever we wish, and completely free at that. Always having access to these tiny, pocket sized encyclopedias wherever we go. Unreal... we're living in the freaking future! 😱

  • @karlclark4641
    @karlclark4641 2 роки тому +392

    Good thing about this video is it makes people like me who missed a lot of education -,probably basic education-understand and become interested in Physics. THANKYOU
    My kids amaze me.

    • @mercedm87
      @mercedm87 2 роки тому +8

      Totally I agree with you.

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 2 роки тому +9

      @@mercedm87 What is E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent. Maxwell's equations are fundamentally consistent WITH what is E=MC2, particle/wave duality, TIME, AND the second dimension in/of SPACE (ON BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! Great. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Notice what is the orange AND setting Sun. Lava is orange, AND it is even blood red. Notice what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. (Consider what is water !!!) Indeed, notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!! Water comes from THE EYE ON BALANCE. Indeed, consider what is E=MC2; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. So, ON BALANCE, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE !!! THE EARTH IS ALSO BLUE. Indeed, consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. AGAIN, CONSIDER WHAT IS E=MC2 ON BALANCE !!! Magnificent. Importantly, gravity is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Great. Consider, ON BALANCE, what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Great ❤️❤️❤️❤️.
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio

    • @sean6623
      @sean6623 Рік тому +10

      i think the exaact same, i took school for granted and never paid attention in my classes, now im obsessed with science, physcis, sapce/time. all this good stuff, but i cant ever imagine a future where i could use this knowlege for a job anyway so its more of a hobby

    • @donjohnson4821
      @donjohnson4821 Рік тому

      @@frankdimeglio8216 That's a whole lot of nonsense... Why are you taking a lovely exchange started by karl and bunging it all up with your pseudoscientific garbage? Go bung up an electric universe videos comments.

    • @wildnhairyone1632
      @wildnhairyone1632 Рік тому

      physics sucks. Clark's Corner I mean asshole I mean Karl

  • @veeranjiveeranji-hb5mj
    @veeranjiveeranji-hb5mj 5 місяців тому +1041

    It’s kinda crazy how nobody’s talking about the book whispers of manifestation on borlest

    • @celiaferreira2028
      @celiaferreira2028 4 місяці тому +3

      Please...by who? What's the actual title? There's too much postings. Not sure which you mean. Went to borlest website but still not sure which you referring to

    • @TrinaLight
      @TrinaLight 4 місяці тому +2

      Can anyone in here can tell me what can get in your throat and perform surgery down there we are attacked and can't get out from whoever that has got in her our body 👅👁️ ears can run allergic wire in the

    • @cllibutti8711
      @cllibutti8711 4 місяці тому +1

      Did you write whispering manifestation ? I plan to buy it soon.

    • @cllibutti8711
      @cllibutti8711 4 місяці тому +1

      Thx

    • @howtheuniverseworks2620
      @howtheuniverseworks2620 3 місяці тому +2

      "Whispers of Manifestation" may not have gained attention in the scientific community due to a lack of empirical evidence or because it deals with subjects outside of mainstream scientific methodology.

  • @youtubeviewer5017
    @youtubeviewer5017 2 роки тому +12

    The ideas presented here didn’t exist until someone else heard them, read them, understood them. Makes perfect sense to me.

  • @TomGrubbe
    @TomGrubbe Рік тому +30

    I never knew quantum biology was a thing. Fascinating and entertaining at the same time. Cudos to the cinematographer as well. The photography in this series is exceptionally good.

  • @elenakoi
    @elenakoi Рік тому +15

    Wow! I have had the Copenhagen Interpretation explained to me countless times. I thought I had a pretty good understanding of it, but I think it just now fully sunk in. I love that we have educational resources like this.

  • @janicesmith9987
    @janicesmith9987 Рік тому +2

    The algorithm brought me here, and for the first time I am thrilled it found this site. Years ago when quantum physics discovered that a thought has mass and does have an effect on the outside of me world, I was beyond excited and amazed. I love this science and hoping soon these scientists will discover the truth about who we are and were we are going. Dare to dream beyond the world as we know it. I am now going to watch it again. Love to all .

  • @wallraven55
    @wallraven55 2 роки тому +100

    This is the first time that I have genuinely understood the double slit experiment and what it meant for light to be both a particle and a wave. And it’s crazier then I imagined.

    • @daddybau2250
      @daddybau2250 Рік тому

      I'm mo

    • @marksnowden6006
      @marksnowden6006 Рік тому +1

      it's been done with molecules of "matter" also, e.g. buckyballs

    • @j.ballsdeep420
      @j.ballsdeep420 Рік тому +3

      I've taken multiple courses that discussed it and simply went with, "shut up and calculate," including lab testing myself. I had never completely comprehended Einstein's disagreement until fully comprehending the seemingly chaos to it and was BLOWN away fully comprehending it watching this. Amazing facility of the subject.

    • @j.ballsdeep420
      @j.ballsdeep420 Рік тому +3

      Like genuinely taken back as my courses weren't at a backwoods academic institution, quite contrary, and I scored quite highly simply shutting up and doing the calculations, but wow. I'm stunned how he presented that allowed me to fully comprehend it finally and made me fervently agree with Einstein finally.

    • @wallraven55
      @wallraven55 Рік тому +2

      @@j.ballsdeep420 you agree with Einstein even though the video made a pretty strong claim that he’s wrong?

  • @Gmmang
    @Gmmang Рік тому +13

    Wow, this gives a whole new meaning to the saying "If a tree falls in the forest, and there’s no one around to hear it, does it make a sound?"

    • @nombanocondo
      @nombanocondo Рік тому

      That question is answered with an understanding that we perhaps do not know the meaning of No-one or nobody we think such a state can exist. Not sure so I'll assume it cannot since the sound of a Sunday is smoother still.

    • @tryptime
      @tryptime 5 місяців тому +6

      sound is vibration of air atoms.. to assume someone with ears needs to be around for the air atoms to vibrate when a tree falls, is stupid.
      here is another one... does a star make light if no one can see it.... the fact that you see stars today; the light from billions of years ago, proves it still does in fact make light even when no one was around to see it.
      everything in nature that is transmission is objective... it is merely the reception of the transmission that has the potential to be subjective.

    • @Tinker1950
      @Tinker1950 4 місяці тому

      What utter rubbish you spout.

    • @jblah1
      @jblah1 3 місяці тому

      @@tryptimeexperiments showing observation collapses the wave function say otherwise

    • @afrog2666
      @afrog2666 2 місяці тому +1

      That`s like asking if an explosion is still loud if nobody`s around, ridiculous question

  • @Pocket379
    @Pocket379 Рік тому +5

    The famous anecdote: when a person who is 120 years old is asked how they managed to live that long; the old person answers--"never argue with anyone", and the curious Jack screams, "but that's impossible" and the old one answers: "you are absolutely right!" )) All scientists are right, they are each explaining a different angle of that What makes Life and Reality to be. Nothing is wrong and nothing is right, it is as if arguing, is the Sun solid or Ever-changing. Great Video, makes One to experience reality! Thank You.

    • @ark-543associates4
      @ark-543associates4 Рік тому

      Great comment especially "nothing is right and nothing is wrong."
      I had so much fun when the Brit "scientist" Dr. Karl Popper, in the 1970's or perhaps late 60's so super teed-off the global academics and "scientists" when he asserted that the theory of Evolution should be considered no more then an interesting metaphysical theory. All the global super-arrogants were so teed off they all got together to write and publish a whole book with each chapter a point against Popper that Evolution was not a theory but a "known" - FACT. Oh-yes how about Carl Sagan's I think first wife and her later renowned scientific studies of corn. Oh and one more - how about Microbiologist Carl Woese's discovery of Archaea which required the RE-drawing of that so-called "Tree of Life" also formerly too often cited as "known"-fact. And of course who was it really that discovered the Double Helix of DNA - it weren't a male!
      Happy 2023 to everyone!

    • @BradleyLayton
      @BradleyLayton 3 місяці тому

      😮

  • @dylan_curious
    @dylan_curious Рік тому +34

    This is a fascinating explanation of the nature of reality and the test that was conducted to determine whether Einstein or Bohr was right. It's amazing to think that the experiment conducted by John Clauser and his team was able to prove that Einstein's version of reality was incorrect, and that quantum mechanics is a more accurate representation of the nature of the universe. The explanation of the experiment was very clear and easy to understand, and it's fascinating to think about the implications of this discovery for our understanding of the world around us. Overall, a great video that really makes you think about the nature of reality and our place in the universe.

    • @pureenergy4578
      @pureenergy4578 Рік тому +7

      Still waves we are whether here or there. We are one huge wave seemingly parted at moments, but not really. Like the ocean and the sky.

    • @Availablehandle-i1k
      @Availablehandle-i1k Рік тому

      This "curtain" separating perceived reality and potential reality, becomes see-through with psychedelics. So fun🍄

    • @krismatic_
      @krismatic_ 11 місяців тому

      Seemingly parted: This is my understanding of this universe, a conscious self-modeling algorithm, pretending to be separate things for the sake of the incomprehensive beauty that comes from its convergence and subsequent amalgamations (our solar system and DNA)@@pureenergy4578

    • @jeffwhitelock1013
      @jeffwhitelock1013 10 місяців тому

      ​@Jess88176 how does the certain become see through with psychedelics? I'm 40 an taken everything from mescaline orange microdots in late 90's an triple dip white blotter sugar cubes in early 2000. I'm just trying g to understand what you mean. Thanks

    • @innosanto
      @innosanto 3 місяці тому

      Einstein was not proven wrong since what he said has not been debunked that it is experimental observance but not the theory.

  • @theworldrealm72
    @theworldrealm72 2 роки тому +19

    Interesting and informative, thank you for the upload. Reading the comments is very amusing, and something I always try to do. Great up. That said, I'm grateful for youtube and all the free docs available to us. A big thx to youtube.

  • @ttbromb8656
    @ttbromb8656 Рік тому +14

    He basically just summed up most of what school failed to teach us in 2 hrs. I feel like teachers teach us to remember the answers rather than actually learning about how things work.

    • @StrizFPS
      @StrizFPS Рік тому +3

      That is exactly what they teach you. They teach you how to remember correct answers so that you can write it on a test. They don't care if you understand it, they only care how they rank compared to other schools based on you answering test questions correctly.
      Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the teachers don't care about the students. It's just that the institution doesn't care what the teacher thinks or feels. The teacher has one job: to make sure you answer questions correctly. Anything beyond that, whether or not the teacher wants to actually teach you and make sure you have an understanding, is irrelevant to the institution.
      If the teacher can't do both, and prioritizes your understanding over your ability to memorize the correct answer, you won't see that teacher again next year or next semester. They're not performing for the institution.
      This is why the education system has failed. In multiple countries across the globe.

  • @matt-g-recovers
    @matt-g-recovers 2 роки тому +78

    These are the best kinds of physics videos.
    Lots of easy explanations with cool visual examples.
    And an outstanding host.
    Thank you for this!

  • @olympiahendrix4392
    @olympiahendrix4392 Рік тому +10

    What an amazing teacher he must be!
    Thank you for the translation! Math is just a language which might as well be ancient hieroglyph to a lot of us!

  • @trapped-ion
    @trapped-ion Рік тому +14

    Great storytelling -as someone(me) with a postgraduate Physics degree, this was a great documentary. I really enjoyed it👍

    • @brucewinslowbacus7663
      @brucewinslowbacus7663 Рік тому

      8j j8ij j j8j8j8j

    • @thomasrobinette3227
      @thomasrobinette3227 Рік тому

      Really proud of yourself aren't you?

    • @trapped-ion
      @trapped-ion Рік тому

      @@thomasrobinette3227 Damn right! - the same delight I have, knowing that even the device you used to deliver your sarcastic message came from physics, engineering and other parts of the system and fields(like aesthetics, targeted markets and whatever)
      Let's not delve into the moral philosophy and political meddling, etc, that happens to beautiful science. Those are not part of the equation in the context of my original comment.
      [sorry, but the pun was intended] 😎

    • @trapped-ion
      @trapped-ion Рік тому

      @@thomasrobinette3227It's not me, but the documentary and being able to relate to it. Sorry to disappoint you, but my ego isn't that big.

  • @bsr8255
    @bsr8255 2 роки тому +50

    Mind blowing presentation and very lucid.Though I am not a science background student,still I could understand. A great presentation and congratulations to all other people who made this documentary possible 👌🙏

    • @4Nanook
      @4Nanook Рік тому +1

      Not so lucid as to get the math even close let alone right.

    • @RealSteelStreet
      @RealSteelStreet Рік тому +1

      @@4Nanook I thought I was the only one who caught that 😳 And I barely graduated high school 🤣

  • @StanKindly
    @StanKindly 2 роки тому +6

    ATTENTION:
    50:19 John Clauser and Alain Aspect JUST WON the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics - 50 years later. Now that's what I call spooky action at a distance! Through time/space on top of it 😳
    40:15 What did John Bell mean by " haven't they heard about the Helium Problem?"
    (1) Do we really know what is happening in the Sun (and other stars)? Is Helium being produced by fusion of deuterons? How are the deuterons being created? Isn't there decay problems etc..and if this is what is happening - what mechanism(s) are "regulating" the fusion of some nuclei (and not others) subjective controlling this "Quantum Tunneling"? In a completey mechanical universe wouldn't the Sun simply explode? Rather it releases just enough energy (or tunnels enough) to feed a self regulating self sustaining syntropic biosphere called Earth. Best case for consciousness I can think of.
    (2) Maybe Einstein and Bohr were both right and both wrong at the same time. I mean Mathematics is great but there has historically been exceptions to the rule (or proofs). Plus equations can be adjusted to match what is proved repeatable in the "real world" of the lab, but there is always flaws i.e. laws of motion, electromagnetism, thermodynamics etc..(99% of the visable Universe is plasma - think about that, no atoms??).
    (3) Imagination is the #1 tool and starting point according to both Einstein, Tesla and others. Consciousness remains "The Hard Problem" in science but sure seems it has a role in Quantum. Or Quantum may come directly from "The Aether" and Aether from Consciousness. Einstein was right about "every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks they know, but don't."
    (4) The truth is: we really don't know what's going on with the Sun, what gravity is, why galaxies hold together, electromagnetism...or how two Electro-Chemists achieved Over Unity Power at room temperature in a test tube!
    Pons and Fleischmann (its very real folks - read about it) discovered probably the biggest most important scientific breakthrough ever!
    But no one knows the exact mechanism?
    (5) Finally we are most likely at the Crucible of our species existence right now. Imagine (as John Lennon said in song). A little less math (and needle moving) and a little more Imagination..and LOVE - the most mysterious force of all, but perhaps the strongest ❤

  • @we8608
    @we8608 2 роки тому +97

    What's uncomfortable is that this documentary only contains a small fraction of what these scientists actually know. I'm thankful this expert shared some of it with us all in layman terms.

    • @quier0vivir
      @quier0vivir 2 роки тому +6

      I agree. I want to know everything. WHY CAN'T I KNOW!!!

    • @josephbenson4413
      @josephbenson4413 2 роки тому +4

      If the layman knows all of what "Physics" knows than he isn't a layman anymore, he is quite probably a physicist and doesn't need Jim dumbing it down for us.

    • @Tombstone2438
      @Tombstone2438 2 роки тому +3

      @@josephbenson4413 if he gets that far I hope he can find the volume control as I cannot hear clearly all he is saying.

    • @TheWorldisALie007
      @TheWorldisALie007 2 роки тому

      Shocking is he is a woman in drag.. Look for your self his so called wife. This world is one big lie.

    • @ChristianSoldier71
      @ChristianSoldier71 Рік тому

      ATTENTION!!!!! Is your heart right with God? We can not hide our sins for God. Jesus Christ loves you and He died for your sins. Repent and put your faith in Jesus as your Lord and Savior and you will be saved. Matthew 4:17 ...Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.

  • @janosdancso9257
    @janosdancso9257 Рік тому +27

    Perfectly constructed presentation: explains many of my experience from physics, chemistry, and other science experience. Thank you. Thank you Prof Jim Al-Khalili.

    • @pjg_77
      @pjg_77 Рік тому +2

      You should also thank the folks in the UK who paid for this bbc documentary by way of a tv license

    • @macysondheim
      @macysondheim Рік тому

      @@pjg_77nahh….

  • @kingsalomi7480
    @kingsalomi7480 2 роки тому +30

    I can't say thank you enough to the researchers and scientist and experimenters that help put in the work to get this great information and understanding about our world and or selves and our universe.

  • @liquidexperience9168
    @liquidexperience9168 4 місяці тому

    Thanks!

  • @MarioMewis
    @MarioMewis 2 роки тому +25

    Thank you Jim for your easy to understand explanations

  • @oversmart77
    @oversmart77 Рік тому +81

    This documentary has truly expanded my understanding of the relationship between breathing and our physical and mental states. It's amazing to think that even a small adjustment in our breathing can have such a profound impact. I also appreciate the emphasis on being patient and kind in our interactions with others, regardless of whether they are human or not.😐

    • @thersten
      @thersten Рік тому

      Are you on drugs?

    • @merlewilliams3244
      @merlewilliams3244 Рік тому +8

      @oversmart77 What ARE you talking about? I guess you watched a different video and put the comment here? Wierd.

    • @Peakfreud
      @Peakfreud Рік тому

      ​@@merlewilliams3244 No it isnt, They havent been extinct that long You're talking about thylacine.

    • @pjg_77
      @pjg_77 Рік тому +1

      Yeah the BBC do some excellent documentaries

    • @PeterPete
      @PeterPete Рік тому +2

      Quote- I also appreciate the emphasis on being patient and kind in our interactions with others, regardless of whether they are human or not.
      It's a pity not everyone shared that same sentiment!!! Guess many people have evil quanta!!!!

  • @MumT05
    @MumT05 Рік тому +11

    I love quantum physics, I've listened to and read numerous books and just like now I'm always struck by the verse.
    "He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. "
    Col 1:17

    • @creatorsremose
      @creatorsremose Рік тому

      If only you realized how insane you sound. I'm truly sorry for you.

    • @Davidcj2023
      @Davidcj2023 Рік тому

      Jesus, yessir. But have you wondered whether he is the creator?

  • @ruudvanveen428
    @ruudvanveen428 2 роки тому +15

    Thank you very much for your again beautiful visualized lecture on quantum-physics. At one point I got stuck, at time-clock 1:42:10, Quote: [ "..in a bizarre but very real sense it's heading in every direction at the same time" ]] E.Q.. Maybe you will wonder why. Here is my premise: "NOTHING (that exists) IS (in) THE SAME TIME! Also bizarre but: how did I came to this statement? Well, last decennial I have some fun in sharing a mysterious riddle which involves the absolute END of TIME. Relatives and other friends are amazed about the simplicity of the answer if once heard. Here is the riddle: "What has no begin and no end and IS still continuously beginning AND ending "at the same time?" The answer is (the) NOW.Why? All aspects of reality within scientific context are: Time, Space, Energy, Mass (or FORM), Consciousness and last but not least Infinity It Self. If ONE of these aspects IS proved to be INFINITE than ALL aspects must be infinite! Because we can know that whatever IS infinite, IT possesses NOT one single property, IS invisible and can NOT exist! Let us start with the aspect Time: What IS IT than? How long takes One moment, being NOW, in time? NONE! IS Infinite! Proof? Where become, while everlasting changing, 3. FUTURE ONE singular, infinite POINT? The NOW Itself is it not? There's a perfect NUMBER for the perfect property of NOW: The start-number Pi (or Py which I prefer) is the basic, whole number 3 which stands for past,present,future as ONE TRINITY, the decimals are standing for the infinite changing of the universe. Well, if time is infinite, space is infinite, mass (or Form) is infinite THAN Consciousness must be ALSO in essence being INFINITE THOUGHT-power, Infinite SOURCE-energy, (Holy or Absolute) LOVE-SPIRIT, Omnicreator, GOD! All bizarre is IN THE (human) PERCEPTION! Do you agree?

    • @fabuloso3635
      @fabuloso3635 2 роки тому

      Good read, thank you.

    • @trayne3156
      @trayne3156 2 роки тому +1

      I absolutely agree with your expounded...🤓🧐

    • @danielash1704
      @danielash1704 2 роки тому

      Energy is never lost it turns into a distance energy is never lost changes then turns back in on itself is powerful enough to be a factor in the magnetic resonance ultra hi ultra low sound understanding echoes of distances between one the other atoms electricity generation we been sending that clicking out far into the galaxy note that your floating around a density of heavy and lite gasses or a mixture of many things with in it all we are desity

    • @Withoutmixture
      @Withoutmixture 2 роки тому +4

      You said nothing.

    • @98f5
      @98f5 2 роки тому

      amphetamines are infinite.

  • @TheThaiLife
    @TheThaiLife Рік тому +5

    This video actually changed my life. I'm shocked and inspired. Thank you.

  • @nubia7418
    @nubia7418 Рік тому +5

    This was AMAZING. I’m a spiritual life coach & so much this is relevant in what I teach. I also make 100% organic beauty products! It gave me a freah perspective & a new approach! Thank you & I appreciate this channel beyond words! Bravo!! 🔥🔥🔥

  • @richeneflowease3622
    @richeneflowease3622 2 роки тому +20

    wow! blown away at the production of this video. Very well done...Obviously must have taken so many hours of hard work which i am immensely grateful for.. ... amazing documentary!

    • @carolinekuo7715
      @carolinekuo7715 2 роки тому +2

      YES I'm impressed by this video too. The bit about electrons the more of it you throw at something doesn't appear to have increased affects.

  • @Plons0Nard
    @Plons0Nard Рік тому +10

    I did not understand any of this. As a beta person it is hard to let go of known laws in physics. I recently attended a wonderfull course by Prof Pierre Capel and got introduced to this. It is hard since logic is out of the window. But I love it !
    Thank you for this beautifull journey 👍👏🇳🇱❤

    • @pureenergy4578
      @pureenergy4578 Рік тому +1

      The understanding is that all energy is a wave, seemingly broken up into smaller waves like the ocean does. But at any moment would you really say that the ocean consists of parts rather than being one?

    • @AndreaNicole-ir9ob
      @AndreaNicole-ir9ob Рік тому +1

      ​@@pureenergy4578ĥĥAAAAAAAAAAAAA

    • @AndreaNicole-ir9ob
      @AndreaNicole-ir9ob Рік тому

      Im so sorry, i fell asleep listening to this all night. I didnt consciously text the comment. Please disregaurd my previous comment😂

  • @thersten
    @thersten Рік тому +29

    This video is stuffed full of annoying ads yet i would be willing to watch a million more ads for this quality entertainment. Spark and Dr. Al-Khalili deserve all the money in the world for sharing their knowledge with us. 🙏❤️

    • @drey8
      @drey8 Рік тому +3

      It's a BBC production, was on BBC4 in the UK.

    • @ChrisHoebeke
      @ChrisHoebeke Рік тому +5

      I didn't see any ads at all. Maybe it's because I pay for UA-cam Premium?

    • @drTERRRORRR
      @drTERRRORRR Рік тому

      You can just get "Adblock" extension to your browser...Looks like getting on your knees and sucking off the giant is also an option for some.

    • @Cody_Bryant1776
      @Cody_Bryant1776 Рік тому +2

      ​@@ChrisHoebeke yeah us on premium don't get ads

    • @ChrisHoebeke
      @ChrisHoebeke Рік тому +2

      @@Cody_Bryant1776 I guess non-premium members pay for content with their time spent watching ads. I spend time working to pay for premium service, so I can save time later, and not watch ads. One way or another, content providers expect to get paid for their time, too.

  • @danstewart2770
    @danstewart2770 Рік тому

    Thanks!

  • @malachi-
    @malachi- 2 роки тому +10

    The best that most of us can hope to achieve in physics is simply to misunderstand at a deeper level.
    - Wolfgang Pauli

    • @Jsqared-aka-justjenn
      @Jsqared-aka-justjenn 2 роки тому +3

      No matter what the distance I'll be with you - Wolfgang Van Halen
      I think 🤔 Wolfgangs on the whole are very quotable.

    • @s4dreamland671
      @s4dreamland671 2 роки тому +1

      “How sad is it that these great gentlemen should believe what anyone tells them and do not choose to judge for themselves! But it is always so.”
      -Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
      This show lost me @1:48 when he acceded to Darwin’s theory of evolution.

    • @s4dreamland671
      @s4dreamland671 Рік тому +1

      @@Jsqared-aka-justjenn “pass the salt!” -Wolfgang Puck

  • @blancaroca8786
    @blancaroca8786 2 роки тому +6

    The fuzziness around the shadow of the hand on the wall in this example at 11.00 not due to bending of light waves (diffraction) around edges but is simply due to light traveling in straight lines and the fact the light comes from a small range of directions due to the width of the sun. This is well known as the penumbra in geometrical optics. A common example of light diffraction would be spread of light from a star which gets worse when you squint. Also from strong small light sources and often seen in photos connected to aperture smallness and shape.

    • @LynxStarAuto
      @LynxStarAuto 2 роки тому +1

      He was using that example to explain why we interpret light as a wave. Same as the bubbles.

    • @linamarie84
      @linamarie84 2 роки тому +1

      Let's not get ahead of ourselves. Ugh

  • @franciscaherreracrisan7227
    @franciscaherreracrisan7227 Рік тому +7

    Thank you so much for the in-depth quality of each explanation, illustration of the different hypothesis in the history of science....I am really amazed and grateful for all the persons who at the first place had the intention and vision to create this fascinating educative material. The sens of humour, the clarity, the metaphores, analogies, the images and examples, the fact that it takes place in labs and in nature...so much to celebrate in this documentary!!! To my opinion, it avoids both very common flaws of this kind of documentaries: oversimplification and overcomplexification...I am myself someone who just couldn't understand at school the rules of physics, chemistry and biology...and it was really frustrating because I wanted to understand as much as I could our reality...So I somehow believed I just couldn't access this decisive understanding...Today, many decades later, I discover this fantastic creation of yours and it instantaneously reconnected me with this fascination and genuine love for how the living forces that sustain life are creating this reality we all live in, raising so many questions about the puzzle of life and its infinite enigmas and mysteries. Thank you so much!! I will definitely watch it several times.

  • @bobcatt2294
    @bobcatt2294 2 роки тому +35

    Just excellent production and content - what a contribution! Thumbs up and subscribed.

    • @ashlittle4545
      @ashlittle4545 2 роки тому +2

      Why 40 adverts? Easily the most adverts of any video I have ever seen. It’s like UA-cam doesn’t want you to keep watching this video?
      Also he doesn’t stress the point enough (in my view) deliberately that if monitoring the double slit experiment we get photons, if not monitored we get wave function. It’s a huge issue he brushes over that needed to be highlighted but strangely was not??

    • @SPMindra
      @SPMindra 2 роки тому

      This guy is somewhat real.
      Am I stones or pounds?
      Quantum. Two places at once.
      Could we be wrong?
      Germany.
      Quantum mechanics
      1869.
      Move forward
      1469
      Machiavelli
      Nanak
      A bl; ock body radiator
      740 to 2000 degrees centigrade.
      The light is ultraviolet.
      It; looks like I am seeing into the sun.
      The Colour of light has a castephy.
      Please help me.
      Today is October 25,2022.

  • @omidw1
    @omidw1 Рік тому +21

    Thank you very much Mr. Prof. Jim Al Khalili. A marvellous presentation of this hard topic in physics. I love it!

  • @jjayneartworkx
    @jjayneartworkx 2 роки тому +4

    🤯🤯🤯i love getting my mind blown every so often...🤤 I'm going to have to listen/watch this a couple few times. 💜
    Fantastic video...many thanks! 🥰

  • @michaelshultz2540
    @michaelshultz2540 2 роки тому +20

    Science and Physics are so wonderfully fun. And the best of all is you can never stop discovering new things as one new discovery always leads to an infinite number of more questions to be explored and answered.

    • @endoalley680
      @endoalley680 2 роки тому +5

      It's all fun and games until somebody starts using mathematical equations.

    • @cole6499
      @cole6499 2 роки тому +1

      @@endoalley680 yeah.,.......... The Bomba.🤬

  • @talijanac1
    @talijanac1 2 роки тому +4

    DAMN the DNA bit BLEW MY MIND I feel rush going trough me. At some level I think this will be life changing.

  • @mystijkissler8183
    @mystijkissler8183 2 роки тому +41

    So fantastic. The delivery of information was the best educational experience I can recall. A big thank you for this video. Well Done.

  • @maharlikanlp
    @maharlikanlp Рік тому +1

    Chemical molecules are playing music to our noses.
    That is so beautiful. I don't know why, it made me cry. Thank you for making something mysterious beautifully easy to appreciate and behold.

  • @albeeh6316
    @albeeh6316 2 роки тому +14

    Thanks, Jim, for making us the lay audience coming to grips with this important subject. As a sociologist I get the impression that the philosophical and social implications are simply profound and that quantum science is at the foundation of society and social life...

  • @suleimanqaisi4426
    @suleimanqaisi4426 Рік тому +5

    No one explain physics like Jim Al Khalili does!!

  • @skyemac8
    @skyemac8 2 роки тому +9

    Proof that perception trumps reality. To our great disadvantage and end.

  • @russelcarty1168
    @russelcarty1168 5 місяців тому +1

    Does anyone know the artist and/or song the young lady sings during the jazz age intro. I love it and her voice. It was a perfect transition in my opinion. Thanks!

  • @gg33
    @gg33 2 роки тому +15

    What a great time to live. Love all the new discoveries, expressions and music from that time. It was the birth of many things.

  • @JackShow-ih1os
    @JackShow-ih1os Рік тому +7

    Thank you for opening our eyes, to the quantum physics. This personally inspires me to study more cross work between quantum physics, dimensions and free will.

    • @partyhardplayhardgaming8106
      @partyhardplayhardgaming8106 Рік тому

      If free will actually exists at this point.

    • @kws767
      @kws767 Рік тому

      @@partyhardplayhardgaming8106 Yes. It has been predetermined. He just doesn't know it yet LOL

    • @partyhardplayhardgaming8106
      @partyhardplayhardgaming8106 Рік тому

      @@kws767 Notice how things that feel good for you are actually bad and things that might not feel good are actually good for you?? It's all created specifically to mess with you, like some sort of messed up experiment.

    • @KandyKane13
      @KandyKane13 7 місяців тому

      ​@@kws767how to prove it?

    • @KandyKane13
      @KandyKane13 7 місяців тому

      ​@partyhardplayhardgaming8106 you must b kidding 😅

  • @nageeb96
    @nageeb96 Рік тому +2

    now this is what i am talking about. real knowledge i hunger for. thank you and please keep it going. its food for my brain and soul

  • @Squirrel-zq6oe
    @Squirrel-zq6oe 2 роки тому +6

    I love how this guy is going around riding bikes and jumping into pools just to give this little demonstrations it makes it really cool.

  • @shortcircuit2336
    @shortcircuit2336 2 роки тому +29

    "We are all born with the knowledge of the universe ✨️ we just need to be reminded that's all." - Shane M. Douglas

    • @joshrawks21
      @joshrawks21 Рік тому +2

      There is no teacher
      Who can teach anything new
      He can just help us to remember
      The things we always knew - Egnima

    • @j.ballsdeep420
      @j.ballsdeep420 Рік тому

      Highly disagree

    • @vanman757
      @vanman757 Рік тому +2

      @@joshrawks21 *Enigma... I have the album on CD myself... "Vive Le Roi, Le Roi Est Mort"... Cracker, isn't it ?.. 🙂👍🏻 I too have always liked that line....

    • @joshrawks21
      @joshrawks21 Рік тому +1

      @@vanman757 yes very good album 👌🏽

    • @shortcircuit2336
      @shortcircuit2336 Рік тому +2

      @@j.ballsdeep420 you will agree one day when you realize you have been conformed by this world and limited to what knowledge you own within it.

  • @geoffreygresham6582
    @geoffreygresham6582 5 місяців тому +1

    When you measure and locate one where is it’s opposite?? Is it an anti particle at that point and is it also then antimatter? And in an anti dimension?

  • @i_make_sounds
    @i_make_sounds 2 роки тому +6

    That was one of the most fun documentaries I've watched. Especially watching you try to cram that giant ball through a door while the credits roll. This was absolutely brilliant. Thank you!

  • @DaimonWalker
    @DaimonWalker Рік тому +13

    I've watched explanations of the two slit experiments before and thought I understood the magnitude of what we see using this experiment. Only just now watching this has it hit me how crazy that outcome is. I think, in the past when I watched explanations on the experiment, I glossed over the fact that single electrons were fired. My whole world understanding has just been rocked.

    • @liketony2
      @liketony2 Рік тому

      can you explain more what you mean and why its so crazy?

    • @anthonyeriksson7537
      @anthonyeriksson7537 Рік тому +1

      Its wierd that single photons fired one at a time through the slits arrange to create a waveinterferance pattern. A beam of photons fired through the slits at the same time creates this pattern presumably because the photons interfere with each others trajectory in the same way waves would do. When the photons instead are fired one at a time this type of interferance should be impossible. However the single photons which seems to randomly arrange themselves at the screen behind the slits does so and regardless of them being fired one at a time still produces the wavelike interferance pattern even though there shouldnt be any interferance.

  • @9xixix9
    @9xixix9 Рік тому +71

    Thank you so very much for this extremely well put together, presented, and filmed documentary. The amount of careful thought put into helping us laypeople understand such a complex topic is extremely appreciated! All the creative ways of explaining an abstract idea is so well done! Thank you to the presenter for such clarity of explanation and positive demeanour. So grateful I can watch this for free and learn invaluable information. I thoroughly enjoyed it! 🙏🙏🙏

    • @kwimms
      @kwimms Рік тому +1

      It's free for a reason... to take you away from reality.

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 Рік тому

      @@kwimms Consider what is THE EYE in relation to what is outer "space". Think about TIME. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Great !!!
      Consider what is TIME. NOW, consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. There IS TIME in conjunction WITH (and in BALANCED relation to) WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground. FUNDAMENTALLY, what is TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Excellent.
      Notice the different COLORS of which what is THE EARTH/ground is manifest. NOW, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun (with the SPACE around it then going invisible AND VISIBLE on balance). It is the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. Moreover, it forms/manifests at EYE LEVEL/body height. In what does constitute a DIRECT (and relevant) comparison, consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. Notice that the curvature or shape of said Moon MATCHES that of WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground (given what is a CLEAR horizon, of course). INDEED, the BULK DENSITY of WHAT IS THE MOON IS comparable to that of what are (volcanic) basaltic lavas on THE EARTH. Lava IS orange, AND it is even blood red. The hottest color of lava IS yellow. NOW, consider what is the blue flame. Notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. Consider what is THE EYE, AS THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. (The Moon is rather invisible when it is blue.) CLEAR water comes from/around what is THE EYE. Excellent.
      Notice that the rotation of said WHITE MOON matches the revolution. Again, WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! NOW, WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. SO, consider the properties of SPACE that is invisible AND VISIBLE on/in BALANCE in relation to WHAT IS E=MC2 AND TIME. (INDEED, consider why there is something instead of nothing ON BALANCE !!!) In DIRECT comparison, WHAT IS THE MOON is FROZEN IN TIME consistent WITH the fact that, ON BALANCE, it is WHITE. (INDEED, it DOES BASICALLY appear to not be moving.) In comparison with what is THE EARTH/ground (AND the colors), the maximum extent of WHAT IS THE MOON IS then VISIBLE !! Again, WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE WHITE MOON matches the revolution !!! Great. Again, consider WHAT IS the orange AND setting Sun in WHAT FORMS or constitutes DIRECT COMPARISON !! Great. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. GREAT. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. Indeed, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. Magnificent.
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio

    • @gavbarker8689
      @gavbarker8689 Рік тому +1

      @@kwimms It's free because he is a professor, and likes explaining difficult to understand elements of reality!

    • @wendellrider1212
      @wendellrider1212 Рік тому

      Great stuff.

    • @vaingloryindia1989
      @vaingloryindia1989 Рік тому

      E😊

  • @Carlsings
    @Carlsings 8 днів тому

    A lot of production, like the analogous vignettes with all those props and theatrics plus the animation and music composition. Some of it entertaining by design I think as people could get bored by the dizzying concepts of dry quantum physics. These shows, directing, scripting filming and production are the result of a lot of professional effort, talent and time (cost too). So I say, bravo! On this post I'll spare you my thoughts about the true nature of our existence and the things are called the universe and the micro verse. It's good that humanity is trying to explore and attempt to explain or understand even the basics of existence given the limits of our ability to perceive them.

  • @TXLionHeart
    @TXLionHeart 2 роки тому +8

    The developers of our simulation were brilliant

  • @brendanlynch3721
    @brendanlynch3721 2 роки тому +5

    Were the coins allowed to spin to static, or were they mechanically stopped ?

    • @cwpcwpcwp3839
      @cwpcwpcwp3839 2 роки тому

      The clubs weren't an issue. Only an example.

  • @TheSlashd0t
    @TheSlashd0t Рік тому +226

    I keep getting a documentary in between my ads

    • @vin7529
      @vin7529 7 місяців тому +15

      get an adblocker for your browser...its 2024 how do ppl still not have adblockers

    • @j.ballsdeep420
      @j.ballsdeep420 7 місяців тому

      ​@@vin7529- Or quit being a leech and pay for premium. I'm so happy Google is breaking it for leeches like you.

    • @j.ballsdeep420
      @j.ballsdeep420 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@vin7529 - It's 2024: Quit being a leech

    • @j.ballsdeep420
      @j.ballsdeep420 7 місяців тому +2

      Ironically I came back and rewatched with a friend to look at the comments where I gave the publisher $10 donation for their efforts besides being a premium user

    • @keithb7910
      @keithb7910 7 місяців тому +8

      So brave

  • @honeykanyadari995
    @honeykanyadari995 Рік тому +2

    I seem to understand something great but it slips through my mind like sand when I try to grasp at it, it's mind blogging what it is, like it's truly incomprehensible to my mind....
    Boy am I glad to discover this video, the awe I felt and mixture of emotions is just, I can't put it into words
    Love it ♥️💅
    This is definitely the highlight of my yr
    Imagine being able to say " I can hear the smell" lol 😆

  • @MysteryD
    @MysteryD 2 роки тому +6

    I never subscribe to these types of channels. But there I went. This is so interesting.

  • @monicafelstead3260
    @monicafelstead3260 2 роки тому +5

    I love how well he explains these complex concepts and yet he will still get silly. Trying to push the ball into his university building, sniffing miniature scent explosions, balancing two cans in a wave pool, good stuff!

  • @CrazyGaming-ig6qq
    @CrazyGaming-ig6qq 2 роки тому +22

    27:27 one of the best and most interesting explanations visually of the mysterious split of the wave pattern.

    • @ashlittle4545
      @ashlittle4545 2 роки тому +3

      It’s not behaving like a wave in singularity though. It’s interference in based on the dimension of TIME related to any kind of monitoring being removed. Quantum physics in my view is based on the removal of time. Aka all photons are released at once, hence the wave.

  • @mr88cet
    @mr88cet Рік тому +1

    11:17 - Well, yes, the fuzzy edges of Sun shadows are partly due to diffraction, but it’s mostly just simply that the Sun is not a point source.

  • @deadphishcheesespread
    @deadphishcheesespread 2 роки тому +14

    One minute in and I'm hooked. Prof. Jim, I love your Documentaries!

  • @richardohare7708
    @richardohare7708 2 роки тому +26

    Ah, Jim always explains it the best. Thanks Jim!!!

    • @richardohare7708
      @richardohare7708 2 роки тому +1

      I'd love to take up a degree in quantum physics with Jim Al khalili

    • @weswaddell6911
      @weswaddell6911 2 роки тому +2

      Io9

    • @sasaperic4515
      @sasaperic4515 2 роки тому +1

    • @jrobles1019
      @jrobles1019 2 роки тому

      Lol yea like when he throws super lights weight red balls at the cans than throws heavy “blue” golf balls knocking down the cans 😂

    • @ChristianSoldier71
      @ChristianSoldier71 Рік тому

      ATTENTION!!!!! Is your heart right with God? We can not hide our sins for God. Jesus Christ loves you and He died for your sins. Repent and put your faith in Jesus as your Lord and Savior and you will be saved. Matthew 4:17 ...Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.

  • @PANSAT
    @PANSAT 2 роки тому +5

    Brilliant, magical Al-Khalili!

  • @PaulN-x2q
    @PaulN-x2q 5 місяців тому +1

    @11:30 - that "fuzz" went away during the last two (partial) solar eclipses. Observe the shadows made by foliage, it was like all the illumination became in-focus? As the eclipse changed, so did the shadow's orientation.

  • @shanimaharaj1185
    @shanimaharaj1185 2 роки тому +5

    So simple.
    Yet so effective.
    Thank you

  • @Kotaluvv
    @Kotaluvv Рік тому +3

    Everything is truly a manifestation of the mind , it’s all about the way u think ,perceive and affect the world around u . The internal work is much stronger then we think , learn to use the mind and ur life will change drastically wether that be negatively or positively is up to u

  • @jorgeandino6553
    @jorgeandino6553 2 роки тому +16

    Cuanta sabiduría genialmente explicada! Gracias Jim Al Khalili. Thanks for your devotion to teaching hard science to comom folks like me.!

  • @deborahryder7521
    @deborahryder7521 Рік тому +2

    I love it as it is basically everything he has written in his book 'Quantum Biology'. Highly recommend!

  • @smc7594
    @smc7594 Рік тому +5

    This is an amazing video! How he story told about physics applying it to our world & self in such an engaging way! I wish more educators teach in this way.

  • @shakeesangwenya4927
    @shakeesangwenya4927 2 роки тому +7

    I can't believe I watched this for almost 2 hours! This was a very interesting content. I've learnt quite a lot and understood quantum Physics better. Thank you.

    • @Abman31
      @Abman31 2 роки тому +1

      If this world was not created by a creator, then most probebly it should've been STATIC (no changes occued throughout the creation, such as being born, growing ,develope, age ,die,fade) .
      But looking at the changing rythem of things (being created out of nothing,then going through life process, and being ended in nothing) ,makes one wonder 🤔, if things have a START ,then they must have a STARTER !!
      And what should we call that STARTER ??
      Perhaps GOD !!?🤔

    • @nnconfomiststoic888
      @nnconfomiststoic888 2 роки тому

      ​@@Abman31 call it your master! Ask how you obedient slave can serve the master

    • @cyclops-king-crap-music-videos
      @cyclops-king-crap-music-videos 2 роки тому

      @@nnconfomiststoic888 it seems to me ( i hope its not true ) that you serve dead things

  • @FleXiTun
    @FleXiTun Рік тому +2

    I came across this by accident and now I’m just convinced that this is all a simulation. This was mind blowing, and eye opening and it puts in question everything I thought I knew about everything. Makes me wonder if there is a way for us to make physical everyday objects and have them do a quantum jump between objects if we make them vibrate enough and give it enough energy.

  • @ucanoe
    @ucanoe 2 роки тому +8

    Great video. I can’t help but think of other theories…for example when you speak of electrons going through slits, first thing that comes to mind for me is that the electron is either deflected by other air molecules before it hits the screen (Plinko effect or Galton board effect) or that the electrons cause a domino effect with other electrons in the air. Either way causing a wave like pattern on the screen on average. I would also think that since molecules are all close together, the idea of entanglement may also play a part through energy sharing, balancing etc.

  • @omutvtube3910
    @omutvtube3910 2 роки тому +5

    Consider entangled particles across vast distances as twins and you’ll be a lot closer to solving spooky at a distance. Just because they behave or effect one another being in separate locations does mean those particles or particle does not effect each other though there is distance between them. What is really going on is (this is the best analogy I can think of) both separated particles have told each other, “hey before we separate if A happens to me then A or B has to happen to you as well, but how does one know the other has changed given the distance issue, or more correctly, how can a prediction be made. I’ve almost got the answer I’ll have to get back to you on it.

    • @cole6499
      @cole6499 2 роки тому +2

      This is really cool stuff. Here's something to think about while you're pondering the answer to entanglement.......... According to Einstein's special theory of relativity , time stops and space / distance collapses hence from a photons perspective distance does not exist. A photon ..... Or pair of photons can be two places at once......... Billions of light years in an other part of the universe and right here now at the same time. That's the action at a distance , no spooky about it.
      Just trying to be helpful , good luck finding a solution for entanglement 😎

    • @johnmartin9321
      @johnmartin9321 2 роки тому +1

      still waiting 😛

    • @patriciashelton6644
      @patriciashelton6644 2 роки тому +1

      Because time and space doesn't exist, Only to us that live in a three dimensional world does it appear to.

    • @omutvtube3910
      @omutvtube3910 2 роки тому +1

      What changes during a measurement of separated particles is not particles themselves but our perception of the measurement. It is extremely complicated to prove but nonetheless a true statement. I’m trying to prove something that may be well outside space/time as far as measuring anything and I will keep searching for a way to prove what I’m suggesting. Either we are measuring wrong, our perception of results are wrong, or what we are trying to measure is outside space/time and therefore can not me precisely measured without coming up with new measurement parameters.

    • @ChristianSoldier71
      @ChristianSoldier71 Рік тому

      ATTENTION!!!!! Is your heart right with God? We can not hide our sins for God. Jesus Christ loves you and He died for your sins. Repent and put your faith in Jesus as your Lord and Savior and you will be saved. Matthew 4:17 ...Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.

  • @IggyFireMist
    @IggyFireMist Рік тому +18

    Reality may defy common sense but it still might help reality for more people to have common sense.

  • @VRnamek
    @VRnamek 2 місяці тому

    it's not everyday that I see a physicist diving into his subjects quite literally. Jim is always entertaining and highly educative...

  • @FrankBoston
    @FrankBoston Рік тому +6

    Even though I don't understand as much as others, I greatly appreciate you being able to explain in a way that I'm much closer to grasping all this than I ever thought I could.

    • @pdxtombstonepiledriver5063
      @pdxtombstonepiledriver5063 Рік тому +2

      I'm right there with you. There is alot I don't understand. But I still enjoy watching and understanding what I can...

  • @storytimewithunclekumaran5004
    @storytimewithunclekumaran5004 2 роки тому +6

    love this video..... really enjoyed it...

  • @roundedges2
    @roundedges2 2 роки тому +20

    But wait...Is the (stream of) electron itself the wave--or merely leaving in its wake, waves of disturbance in the space it moves through--like waves caused by a pebble (or speedboat) moving through water? The wave we see is the water moving--not the pebble or boat that moved the water.

    • @Squirrel-zq6oe
      @Squirrel-zq6oe 2 роки тому +9

      That's an interesting point. Each electron is leaving a wake of causality behind.

    • @WhatTheFriedRice
      @WhatTheFriedRice Рік тому +1

      It’s the concept of complementarity, the electron is both a wave and a particle itself not a mass leaving a wave in its wake. In fact according to QM all mass has this complementarity but decoherence occurs as soon as the system becomes complex so that’s why it’s not observed macroscopically.

    • @noahedelson3618
      @noahedelson3618 Рік тому +1

      @@WhatTheFriedRice i had a hard time understanding decoh.. wikip needs a btter page. argh. i need a bttr keybrd.

    • @WhatTheFriedRice
      @WhatTheFriedRice Рік тому

      @@noahedelson3618 oddly start with the wiki of coherence first and if you’re interested in more in depth explanation I highly recommend checking out the QuTech Academy and QM Oxford YT channels

    • @roundedges2
      @roundedges2 Рік тому

      I think I meant to say "photon" not "electron". As I understand it, unlike photons/light waves which propagate in a straight line, electrons orbit nuclei in atoms at discrete distances

  • @gavbarker8689
    @gavbarker8689 Рік тому +1

    I've currently been trying to understand the theory of relativity, quantum physics and the curvature of space time. Now I need to work out quantum entanglement and Einsteins quantum what what ..... think i need to watch it again!!!! Brilliant work, Great analogies, keep up the good work Jim.

    • @mdd1963
      @mdd1963 Рік тому

      I will never understand time dilation; in my world, you travel at the speed of light 4.3 years, you reach the nearest star; travel back at the speed of light, and exactly 8.6 earth years have passed. :) ( no planet of the apes scenarios!)

  • @phapnui
    @phapnui 2 роки тому +6

    First twin slit experiment was in 1801 by British polymath Thomas Young, over 100 years before Bell Lab.

    • @petethewrist
      @petethewrist 2 роки тому

      Try it with two slits in front of two other slits then a back screen. I did????

    • @ethanmccormack9561
      @ethanmccormack9561 2 роки тому

      @@petethewrist no one cares what you do.

    • @petethewrist
      @petethewrist 2 роки тому

      @@ethanmccormack9561 obviously you do... As your snide remark shows. ??

  • @myly30
    @myly30 11 місяців тому

    Very exciting and enjoyable moment of learning from the beginning till the end of this marvelous presentation. Thank you a lot for sharing Professor Jim Al-Khalili. I extremely appreciated you and your team by making this educational video about Quantum Physics, Biology, and its Mechanics to better understand our universe and nature around us. Its so fascinating how nature react in metamorphosis to continue their evolution. And very well explained yet intriguing topic of Einstein or Bohr nature of reality theory. I'll definitely watching this film documentary over again. Congrats to all individuals that collaborate this outstanding documentary! Truly mind blowing!

  • @nrao8977
    @nrao8977 2 роки тому +11

    No better and a powerful "creator" than one's mind.
    A great video!!
    Thanks 😊

    • @Bumbaross
      @Bumbaross 2 роки тому

      Who created the mind

    • @nrao8977
      @nrao8977 2 роки тому +1

      @@Bumbaross
      Each one of us creates our own mind.
      It is just another "object", just like every object in the universe.

    • @rai.navi_
      @rai.navi_ 2 роки тому +1

      @@Bumbaross it evolved over the time according to need of the time .. as we did so did our mind 😑

  • @LoitersWithIntent
    @LoitersWithIntent 2 роки тому +35

    Jim al Khalil, you are an amazing host and narrator

  • @BabzSmkl-qp9li
    @BabzSmkl-qp9li Рік тому +1

    But yes.. much appreciation to the professor for 'shedding light' on the subject. Brilliant

  • @sgill4833
    @sgill4833 2 роки тому +5

    Wow thought I knew much about physics. Fascinating

  • @jayrovers
    @jayrovers 2 роки тому +5

    More more more JIM!!! ❤️

  • @የሠውነገር-ጰ3ሰ
    @የሠውነገር-ጰ3ሰ 2 роки тому +4

    Thank You! That was an amazing explanation

  • @PengiPou
    @PengiPou Рік тому

    1:20:26 I was a bit upset to hear the wound 'd' string plucked and having an unwound 'b' play instead. I wonder if there's something quantum going on that helps me hear the difference in windings

  • @lionmountainman1630
    @lionmountainman1630 2 роки тому +18

    Our experiences in life are permanently recorded in the quantum realm.

    • @dutchhoke6555
      @dutchhoke6555 2 роки тому +1

      ..I think the idea is that it's so fast (omnipresent ?..hmm ) it's acting everywhere, until you take a picture/
      image. A roulette
      wheel might be a handy demo, which he did shoot arrows into one.

    • @AllIn1Studio
      @AllIn1Studio Рік тому

      The conclusion was so inconclusive! The layers and layers of inter connectivity and reaction in the nature of being is what calls us to the spirit. I was surprised that the Heisenberg principle wasn’t mentioned …only in passing….and that thought plays a key role in outcomes. Belief structures results in our reality. We shape it through thought and action or thought and non action. More power to ya!

  • @georgiaguardian4696
    @georgiaguardian4696 2 роки тому +13

    Quantum biology is an amazing new field.

    • @dawnsites4232
      @dawnsites4232 2 роки тому +4

      Will it be used for good or evil?

    • @galaxygaminggallery
      @galaxygaminggallery 2 роки тому +2

      @@dawnsites4232 the question we live for

    • @jameselliott9055
      @jameselliott9055 2 роки тому

      @@dawnsites4232 humans know how to do good?
      pffffffft! BWAH HA HA HAA HAA HA HAAA HEE HEE HEH HAAAA HAA HAA HA HAA!
      GTFOH!

    • @Theactualcurrentsea
      @Theactualcurrentsea 2 роки тому +4

      Think we all really know the answer to that. If it’s used for good, then it must be used for evil as as well, right?

    • @roundedges2
      @roundedges2 2 роки тому

      That's nothing--We now have quantum gender science.

  • @lionmountainman1630
    @lionmountainman1630 2 роки тому +4

    The act of thinking is a quantum exercise.