Moon in High Resolution through Telescope
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 тра 2015
- This is a Moon Walk on a high resolution picture I made with my 10" Skywatcher Newton Telescope.
Equipment I used: jwastronomy.com/me/equipment
Instagram: / j.w.astronomy
Facebook: / jwastronomy
Website: jwastronomy.com/
Affiliate Links:
Telescope: amzn.to/2flTYoX
Mount: amzn.to/2flZLet - Наука та технологія
Hey guys, my Startup ASDRO ( asdro.de ) needs your help! Vote for us to let ASDRO win the German Breakthrough Award. Click on ASDRO on the bottom of the page (grey box). Here's the link: www.connect.de/ratgeber/breakthrough-2020-award-apps-software-online-servcies-asdro-3200303.html Thank you so much!
??
What telescope is this?
Very good job. Which country did you watch the moon from?
I just looked at the moon through a telescope for the first time. Its unbelievable, not only is it outrageously bright, actually looking at the real thing, as a real object, the ACTUAL photons of the moon making physical contact with your eyes is far different then looking at a photograph. Its even scary seeing this behemoth suspended in a pure black void, even more so when you realize how far away it actually is. To get to it, you'd have to travel the pole to pole distance of every planet in our solar system.
@@maxsmith695 what?
2,124 miles
@@zpirateko2129 - free Pedro
@@maxsmith695 More like 66,000 miles or something in that nature.
@@Micscience You would get a F- in my Physics class. It is not rocket science to measure the distance of the moon to the earth.
Well there must be life up there because I am sure I heard some crows in the background.....
😂😂😂
Googel+ lmao
Heard that too.. 😊 😂😂
😂 😂 😂 😂
😅🤣
amazing footage, such a powerful telescope
i don't know what kind of equipment this person is using, but if you observe the moon long enough, eventually you capture footage like this: ua-cam.com/video/CPTv-Hz-tp8/v-deo.html
@@skylerlandale1437 I agree, would love to have the of that telescope he or she is using. Definitely other intelligent life forms in the universe for sure; it's so vast, we just haven't found anything yet. Check out the FOX LAKE incident, in Canada 1996, over 20 people see a craft, it was huge, the width of Fox Lake, and the height of an apartment block, here is the link: ua-cam.com/video/Rx5YprfueAQ/v-deo.html
@@david-ky7rt yes if we are observing them now, they have definitely been here for a long long time, and if they had any ill intentions, we would have experienced it by now. thanks for sharing that interesting link!
@@skylerlandale1437 Hi Skyler, no problem, the Fox Lake incident is well interesting, it might be linked to another incident that happened between whitehorse and Carmacks, two brothers were driving from whitehorse to carmacks, 177.0 km, a good 2 hour drive, and remote area, here is the link to that one, same year 1996: ua-cam.com/video/iDgDxav3d0E/v-deo.html
@@skylerlandale1437 they use skywatcher telescope ..
Hey guys,
if you want to capture images like this too, check out my online tutorials and recommendations for your (first) telescope. Here's the link: www.patreon.com/JWAstronomy
Thanks for your support!
Julian
Did you catch any Ufo's ? i know there are a lot up there... Amazing Moon !
Dude the moon is a scary place just by looking at it on telescope and I'm wondering what Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin felt when they landed on it the first time, must be hair raising.
J.W.Astronomy check out John Leonard Walson’s YT channel, he is getting some resolution at the refraction limit, amazing. Also amazing is what he’s discovered up there. NASA has some explains to do.
Alexandra missDUTCHESS lol, it would just be a blob.... most stars are millions of light years away (or further) . Our Sun is the only star we can actually resolve with detail.
The moon is flat
Stunning. Beautiful. Thanks for the magnificent views and the tour.
Don't you just love it when you are on a scientific channel and you express a curiosity and some bloviated know it all responds with generalities or insults this really helps to expand ones knowledge.
Wow what is the moon??? You can see the craters and the dirt and stuff on the moon. You can see hills almost and mountains... I think evrybody missed the fact that its a world the moon looks like one... I saw it through binoculars i almost could see the horizon and the hills and mountains it has... Blows my mind how its like another world the moon
Definitely cheese
Lmao
Hahahahaha
Yah thats one in tom & jerry
feta cheese, to be specific.
Wallace & Gromit
The Moon is the easiest celesial object to observe from Earth- but also, it is the most beautiful one!
Looked at the moon through my land telescope for the first time today, might be the most beautiful thing I’ve ever seen in my life
Best footage I've ever seen threw a 10 inch. Extraordinary job!
🤨
My favorite part when he looked at the moon
Same
Same
Can I use some of the footage here in a UA-cam video? I would pay.
Incredible pictures! I just recently picked up a QHY 5P-II-C camera and haven't had it out yet. Hope I can achieve similar results when I put it on my C11!
Beautiful images and music too!
Mike on Earth
Cool! Did you know the top of the arc on a lit sphere always points at the source of light? In this case it is the Sun.
0:50 you can see transformers
Nope brotha i dont see em
😂😂😂😂
@@bullrancher6508 bottom right, in the crater
So many perfect circles. Also something inside those circles. There is lights coming out and trails like something moving across the surface.
Don't you just love it when your at a scientific channel and express a curiosity and some bloviated know it all responds with generalities or insults this really helps to expand ones knowledge
markus north it's called suppressed information.
@@ron1martens I can't believe all the ruckus over a simple question. the funny thing is I wasn't there to observe the moon I was interested in the photography technique which I find fascinating, and all I get is a bunch smart ass remarks.
markus north
Initially I used to think trolls were like a stick in the mud. Then I learned Government and corporations spend billions to hire trolls to insult people, argue with them and be abusive.
When you report them to utube, your response is their comment falls within utube guidelines.
Then utube took away a feature which revealed where trolls were making comments and you could expose them.
So keep this in mind. Trolls always deny they are trolls. And sometimes say they are.
People have caught onto them.
@@markusnorth8071 Yes I know. Some of the supposedly intelligent ones can be as pathetically abusive as flat earthers, etc.
@@SMHman666I never realized there were so many people in the USA that are too ignorant to recognize gate way communism, too lazy to work, too educated to have common sense, too arrogant to listen to reason, too narrow minded to see both sides and prefer victimhood over freedom...
Wow. That is some resolution! This is excellent work. Well done!
thanks!
Amazing, at 2:07 there's a thin long 'scar' with what looks like three bridges across it.
Andrew Jenery read the book (PDF) Somebody Else is On the Moon. By George Leonard (c) 1977. If you want to know the truth. Why would the CIA buy up all the printings of this book? Only a few thousand made it to the street. Several people host servers that allow you to down load it for free. Learn the truth, tell others.
@@MrJackal43 It's a very interesting book
John Smith read its companion piece “Penetration” by Ingo Swann, the CIA’s top remote viewer. Startling stuff, why it wasn’t made into a movie IDK, well actually I do know, the CIA controls Hollyweird. Leonards book is mentioned in Swann’s piece, which is a PDF on the web as well... the truth is much more frightening then reality.
@@MrJackal43 I have started reading it. Might be a good time to finish it. Have you read any of Bruce Cathie's books?
John Smith no, he's the"electro-dynamic" grid guy, interesting stuff. I'll have to check out one of his books soon...
I have a sky watcher sky hawk telescope I think it's the same one as yours what lenses did you use to see this I have the barlow lens which is the only one I know how to use I also have a super 10mm lens along with a super 25 wide angle long eye relief but i dont know how to use these 2 please help mee
incredible resolution! Amazing video, well done! thank you
Thank you for sharing. Great photography! A+ A+ A+ Better than NASA!
Beautiful
Amazing. And the mount has no problems even in equtorial mode ?? Tracking is good ??
Looks like a night light to me, Amazing!
Makes me appreciate Earth having an atmosphere!
Is there a fucking goat on the moon! Why do I hear a goat 😂😂😂😂
rafael moraes did you check you moms bedroom.
What, can you speak a little louder?
rafael moraes loo
thank you for sharing your awesome close up of the moon
How much stacking did you use for this high resolution image?
How do you get clear images on your telescope?
🤔 good question
HMM... WOW THATS A HARD QUESTION.................
The biggest telescope on earth is the Gran Telescopio Canarias with a 10.4 Mt mirror. looking at the moon from earth, cramming in 384,000Kms a single pixel is around 90 Sq
90sq? Square metres?
Outstanding work, Subbed.
Could you please give an information about optical devise you used for?
To all the skeptical commenters - just try this yourself. You'll see this is about how the moon looks even if your optical device is not as powerful. Even with binoculars you can see some craters. Maybe try a a cheap telescope, or a camera with a really nice zoom lens, like the P900.
You give better moon images than Nasa ! Great job those are the most beautiful images i jave ever seen of the moon
What s wrong with you people?
@@CrazyPets0 i dont get it ! I wrote a compliment , i wrote those are the most beautiful images i have haver seen and you wrote me : whats wrong with you? Are you ok??
@@alicesabbadini6783 Yes, I'm ok. I copied that message, but I posted it in wrong comment. Sorry.
@@CrazyPets0 ah ok :) no problem!
@@alicesabbadini6783 Lazy kid never took 5 seconds in her life to google "NASA Moon picture" and comments "You give better moon images than NASA". How can humans be so lazy and so dumb? Look at this picture: moon.nasa.gov/resources/347/aristarchus-crater/?category=images
Did this use image stacking or processing? if it did please tell me what software you used.
Have one 12 inch telescope what do I need to do tu have the same videos?
1:08
Aliens
ABC TRAVELER you are a dumb fuck
😄😄
@@vagatronics are you? Take a joke
@@vagatronics no u
@@vagatronics so you dont believe in aliens? Even though NASA has confirmed them?
excellent excellent quality!, even though my observing is about the same i have a 10" dobson, a 6 inch refractor and a very good 3 inch old Japan refr., the trick is to photograph it , so far i haven't been able to.i would surely like to know the camera used and important also the location and condition of the sky.
Thank you! The camera is an Alccd5l-IIc. You can see an detailed article about it here: jwastronomy.com/me/equipment
J.W.Astronomy Can you find the spot where I landed on the moon in 1958 there should be a long furrow about 200 feett long some foot prints and a dead chicken that exploded there?
///AMG well it doesnt
of course its not flat.
///AMG And you can see right through it. But they landed on it. Lol
@///AMG its not flat its a sphere just like earth
J.W. Astronomy, what would cause hat line or crack from 2:10 to 2:20?
Excellent video, best I've seen so far
Great images! You’re not getting atmospheric distortion, is that due to your position?
how come all of the holes on the moon are straight hits? Why didn't any comet/astroid/ect. Drag along it? You know, like the drag marks from Comets we get here on Earth sometimes? Looks to me like they've been aiming at it, rather than it being random.
They usually aren't "straight-on hits". The impact crater "holes" are created by the release an object's "energy of motion" (kinetic energy) creating a massive explosion at the point of impact to excavate the crater. They are thus not by formed by the object's physical size itself just pushing the material aside at it hits, but by that huge blast from the impact which explodes in all directions like setting a bomb off at a certain location. For a terrestrial example, Meteor Crater in Arizona was formed when a body about 130 feet across traveling at over eight miles per second from the north-northwest hit the ground, forming a roughly circular crater that is 3,890 feet (about 0.74 miles) across. The impact explosion has been estimated to be equivalent to a 10 megaton nuclear bomb going off at the site. Even objects coming down at less than straight-on angles will generally form circular craters due to that massive explosion effect. Only meteoroids that come in at very low angles close to grazing the surface will form slightly oval craters.
Yea, I get what you mean in a way, But even the meteoroids that come at low angles dont leave a trail before hitting. I get that it might not have that effect on earth taking "gravity" into play. But the Moon has No gravity, there should be tons of Little rocks and huge rocks grazing the Moons surface and leaving a trail, right?
The Moon does have gravity. It's much lighter than Earth, so it's gravity is weaker, but it's still there. It's the reason we have tides on Earth (the Moon's gravity pulling Earth and the oceans is what causes the water level to rise and ebb twice a day)
As for the circular impacts, I know it's not instinctive to think they have been caused by side hits. We're too used to look at low energy impacts (like a rock thrown into sand) that causes elongated marks. But when talking the kind of energy a meteor strike releases, it doesn't work that way anymore. Rock gets broken or even liquefied, and sent away in a circle by the energy of the blast.
A good analogy would be what happens when you stike a liquid surface. If you throw a rock into water on a low angle, it won't leave a "trail". You will have some projections in the direction of the hit, maybe secondary hits, but mostly, you will always have a circular expanding "ring" wave, and a small projection right in the middle of the circle.
Now look at these craters, with their ring of matter and the small protrusion in the middle. Looks familiar?
mark why does the moon not hit earth. if the earths gravity is much stronger than the moons ?
A very neat explanation.
It would be cool to have a distance reference. I wonder how big those craters are all the time.
Hello what telescope is it please and are u able to see stars and other planets
I can hear sounds of birds and goat in this video
screw google moon this is WAY BETTER U CAN SEE EVERYTHING
Which telescope you are using bro ? Can give suggestion for some best telescope for me
What's a good not to expensive telescope or there?
Wow amazing work man. Admirer.
Wow
Moon has really taken the beating from asteroids
bond dwarfman u need to see it through the telescope
There are published papers of volcano activity making some of those craters supposedly. Some reason I feel like they are drill sites I don’t know why my mind goes places.
STEELSURFER where did you get your PhD
@@steelsurfercore5642 wow your a complete fucking dumb ass I know 7 year old
Smarter than you
@@steelsurfercore5642 have you heard of gravity dumb ass
My man ---seeing that you have the correct equipment to take crystal clear images of the moon ---- please take photos of the actual rover and the landing sites and equipment of the Appolo missions --- it will satisfy the world's curiosity
This picture is magnificent.
The music Is very calming.
Great video👍
Where is the moon buggy?
Moon buggy (Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle LRV) is too small to be resolved by amateur telescopes
www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19050795
Trust me it is TINY
@@karolmasztalerz1943 but not by non-amateur telescopes
www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/584641main_apollo17-left-670.jpg
@@petterlarsson7257 That's not a ground-based telescope image though. This is an image from the LRO, Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. It's a spacecraft that orbits the Moon, and as such, it is much closer to the landing sites. In fact, LRO orbits around 100 km above the Moon, so that's significantly closer than any ground based telescope (Earth-Moon distance is about 380 000 km). Even professional ground-based telescopes can not see details as small as the lunar landers. For that, you need a spacecraft that orbits the Moon.
No satellite transitions or stars beyond the moon? Not even a twinkle?
It was et up to take pictures of the moon and not the stars. When the telescope take pictures of stars they have to be out of sight of the moon because of its light obscuring the image.
ever heard of something called light
What zoom ranges is your telescope ?
Se did the same thing last weekend. The terminus is absolutely the spot.
Hey, just curious.. pause at 1:56, and I see two things edited out... I thought this wasn't a NASA channel..
No.This is just stiching glitch from stacking process.
This looks like the LRO data with his color data overlayed i may be wrong if so wow.
So this is a CGI image is what your saying? Not an actual picture thru multiple lenses?
Jack, I fully agree with you having a go at these conspiracy morons, but please refrain from using a mental impairment as an insult.
what was edited out i dont see anything
Where's the flag?
delusional kid
you wouldn't see it. It's way too small.
No flags on moon. That were staged on earth
Lol you know how small it is you fucking dumbass hahah. The moon isnt the size of a basketball.
In Hollywood!!
Man, all of your work is amazing.
Thank you!
am i seeing things or is one of these moon shadows a great big hole? i just thought maybe different minerals that made those shadows the face of the moon..
Wow, how did you get better quality pictures then nasa?
You should see dozens if not hundreds of satellites in front of the moon. Where are they?
scattered around the globe, its very rare to see them on your telescope
prove you should be seeing dozens.remember they are far away from each other and are tiny
Karol Masztalerz There are supposed to be between 25,000 and 50,000 satellites. You could look at the moon for a week straight and you won't see any because there are no satellites.
Sal Amander my friend literally filmed one Passing moon and another friend took Photo of ISS in front of Sun :) there are less than what you said.Do some Research on subject.Most of them are to small to be Seen anyway
+Sal Amander it is quite common to see satellites zoom by while watching the night sky.
Impressive - and very well made!
Beautiful, thank-you for sharing!
Amazing.... But those crates look like bad acne scars
Is this a paste and copy of nasa?
no.It is amateur image through amateur telescope
This is super cool, well done!!!
How did you make it into a stacked video i thought you can only do stacked pictures
So, if we only see this side of the moon with the craters facing us, then the meteors came from Earth and hit the moon? Explain that!
Just build a to scale model of Earth and Moon; you'll see there is plenty of room for anything go go in between.
the moon rotates. read a book. educate yourself .
no because the moon used to spin but it stopped spinning because it got locked in place because of earths graviational pull so now it no longer spins so its been around for billions of years so it could of been hit any time by asteroids
@@Splitpro_Games It still rotates at about once every 27 days.
@@SMHman666 yeah but we only see this side of the moon we never see the other side hence why its called the dark side of the moon
Lol the conspiracy theorist in the comments ask the dumbest questions.
George Luz and you are asking no questions. Here’s another spoon for ya. 🥄
@FEVA : however, he is right.
You mean dumb question like "how come that with a much better technology we are still not able to go in a place we have allegedly reached 50 years ago?". And please spare me with the nonsense of the cost. In the 60's they have spent real money (dollar was pegged to gold back then) while nowadays you can use worthless paper (funnily enough still called "dollar" though)
Flat Earth Vegan Amy it's a comment... in a comment section... more moronic flat head logic for you...
Why is it we can see the moon in full detail using digital cameras? Isn’t it supposed to be 239,000 miles away? I understand this is a telescope but with many digital cameras, you can get some really detailed shots of the moon. That thing is very close to
Us.
Can you please include size ratio on planets stars you are showing to us?
so the link to website doesn't work...what equipment was used?
so high resolution, i can't even see one single star at the back of the moon
Exposure
stevengho ohgnevets....So, here we go with the "I can't see stars" thing again. Hasn't anyone explained that to you yet or do you simply refused to believe it. Any good photographer could answer that.
The light from the moon will overpower the light from a star, its the same reason photos of the Milky Way have to be taken when there is no moon in the sky.
Jimmie Hyatt
The Moon has no atmosphere to block the stars from being seen. Here on Earth you can take pictures of the stars, even with our bright atmosphere...interesting how that is...
The atmosphere plays no part in the reason you can't see stars in a photo. Its all about time exposure. Photographing stars takes SECONDS of exposure time. Taking photos of bright objects like the full moon only requires fractions of a second.
Where is the American flag on the moon?
www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-19050795
I mean people have to be really fucking stupid to think a FLAG will be visible on a fucking picture taken from thousands of miles away jeez
Lakitha Mutucumarana ikr
If you take an image of a city skyline that's 30 miles away, you cant see individual windows on skyscrapers. The same concept applies here.
It's easy to see structural anomalies in the shadowed areas.
Lots of right angles and at 2.35 middle of the screen what is
that with the sun shining on it, look very straight and must be huge
for us to see it.
What a breathtaking. Thanks for the video. So amazing.
Thank you!
Nothing is on the moon, because nobody was there.
well i wish you wern't here
yeah, totally. Let's get back to bombing gaza
LOL CGI detected!!
Even the bluish grey around the moon???
Not saying it's fake just I guess like you said something edited.
curious goat interlude?
Jjromoustadz LOL STUPID CONSPIRACY THEORIST DETECTED
raw footage of moon. ua-cam.com/video/tvwGJBj_jNw/v-deo.html
I have a question about vision and distance if you don't mind, I was thinking I can work out that with my very small telescope I can see creators on the moon that mathematically work out at around 10 miles wide and find it hard to get my head around the fact that with my telescope I can see 250,000 miles away firstly and that I can see small creators how is this possible when I could barely see huge structures on earth with my telescope that are less than 30 miles away? is the moon really that far and if so how can a modest cheap telescope see this clear and far. Just thinking out loud.
@Philip Labonte yea right;) So why do we have sunsets, that are not possible on flat earth?
Yo. This is the most awesome vid of the moon. My tele don’t do that. Wooooooooow. It must be something to see all that in live action
What’s up with the blurred horizon lines?
What kind of telescope was used?
Have you can you zoom right in to see alien structures and or man made stuff is there a telescope that can see boulders up close or inside a crater.. please tell
No he can't
How much is the cost for this bit of kit?
Beautiful resolution!
Amazing..What is the bluish greyish rim around the moon???!!! These photos reaveals a lot..wow..
are satellites low orbit?
Beautiful capture Julian!
@j.w.astronomy What is this straight line visible from 2:08 min till 2:24 min?
Border between the illuminated and shadowed part called terminator.
Who know name of soundtrack this video?
Inspired choice of music. Inspiring pictures.
Breathtaking
Do you have a shot of "Mons La Hire" ?
At 2.07 in to film you can clearly see a track with bridges going over it while the rest of it disappears into the shadow out of sight
Magical - well done
At 2:15 what is that?? Looks like a path or trail of some sort