You are most welcome. Glad they are helping so much 😊I will try to do a paper 3 walk through if I have time, definitely of issues and debates but can include forensics too.
Hey Sir, for q3 you talk in the answer as if it is guaranteed the students will become more active, how are you meant to know this from the STEM as it says "whether or not students..." "could depend on mediational processes" "explain how mediational processes might be involved..." I interpreted this as they might become more active or might not and talked in my answer that way e.g. i said it depends on the students motivation, attention, retention, reproduction etc.
Good question - this is a good example of the possibilities with an application; as long as your answer/application fits with the scenario you should gain credit. Your answer could most certainly include ways in which the meditational cognitive processes lead the observer NOT to imitate. I did in fact have examples of that to include but I felt my answer was getting rather long (perhaps I should have included it after all!)
@@BearitinMIND Yes that would've been helpful haha!- Here's what I wrote "Mediational processes influence the student's decisions on whether to repeat miss honey's active lifestyle behaviour or not. This is because it depends if the students pay attention to miss honey's behaviour e.g. whether they care about her increase in activity or not, and they have to remember her being active (retention) as well as being able to think they can reproduce her behaviour physically e.g. some fat students may not be able to be as active as miss honey. Finally, they must also have a motivation to reproduce her behaviour e.g. they can be incentivised to become more active by wanting to become more fit themselves" Can you let me know what you think please?
Nice answer. I'd slightly improve your attention application 'as caring about her increase in activity or not' is more related to motivation. For attention, make sure to focus on their focus - what they watched. For retention you need to make it about memory - you lack application to the scenario in terms what made it more (or less!) memorable. Reproduction is better. Motivation is good. Hope that helps.
Hey thanks for the brilliant video! Is it a valid eval to say that conditions of worth are unfalsifiable e.g. you cannot prove that conditions of worth are not the cause of an individuals behaviour? I feel like that might be a convoluted point to explain, so maybe it is better to argue that conditions of worth are not directly observable? Let me know what you think please
Yep - that would fit under the heading I included about evaluating the research methods. The Humanistic Approach actively dos not want to be scientific so often is criticised for being unfalsifiable 👍. I would include this in a large paragraph about criticising the research methods in which you could include a number of problems. Hope that helps.
These videos giving me PTSD from that exam 😭
Today's exam was better than I would have expected! Thank you for your immediate work on paper 2 to provide us guidance!
Glad to hear it 😊 Hope the paper 2 walk throughs help
Can you make videos on schizophrenia, relationships and addiction before paper 3 exams on 3rd June thank you
I second this, schizophrenia, relationships and addiction!! Also thanks for all the videos so far
yes please !!!!!! sz is good relationships and addiction r so bad
I have a mock exam tomorrow and this helped thanks :)
Glad it’s helped - all the best with your exam tomorrow 👍
THANK YOU SO MUCH ! These walkthroughs are so helpful and so well explained, would you be able to do forensic psychology in paper 3 please?
You are most welcome. Glad they are helping so much 😊I will try to do a paper 3 walk through if I have time, definitely of issues and debates but can include forensics too.
Hey Sir, for q3 you talk in the answer as if it is guaranteed the students will become more active, how are you meant to know this from the STEM as it says "whether or not students..." "could depend on mediational processes" "explain how mediational processes might be involved..." I interpreted this as they might become more active or might not and talked in my answer that way e.g. i said it depends on the students motivation, attention, retention, reproduction etc.
Good question - this is a good example of the possibilities with an application; as long as your answer/application fits with the scenario you should gain credit. Your answer could most certainly include ways in which the meditational cognitive processes lead the observer NOT to imitate. I did in fact have examples of that to include but I felt my answer was getting rather long (perhaps I should have included it after all!)
@@BearitinMIND Yes that would've been helpful haha!- Here's what I wrote
"Mediational processes influence the student's decisions on whether to repeat miss honey's active lifestyle behaviour or not. This is because it depends if the students pay attention to miss honey's behaviour e.g. whether they care about her increase in activity or not, and they have to remember her being active (retention) as well as being able to think they can reproduce her behaviour physically e.g. some fat students may not be able to be as active as miss honey. Finally, they must also have a motivation to reproduce her behaviour e.g. they can be incentivised to become more active by wanting to become more fit themselves"
Can you let me know what you think please?
Nice answer. I'd slightly improve your attention application 'as caring about her increase in activity or not' is more related to motivation. For attention, make sure to focus on their focus - what they watched.
For retention you need to make it about memory - you lack application to the scenario in terms what made it more (or less!) memorable. Reproduction is better. Motivation is good.
Hope that helps.
@@BearitinMIND thanks for the advice sir
can you please upload paper 3 revision videos for schizophrenia, relationships and aggression 🙏
Hey thanks for the brilliant video!
Is it a valid eval to say that conditions of worth are unfalsifiable e.g. you cannot prove that conditions of worth are not the cause of an individuals behaviour?
I feel like that might be a convoluted point to explain, so maybe it is better to argue that conditions of worth are not directly observable?
Let me know what you think please
Yep - that would fit under the heading I included about evaluating the research methods. The Humanistic Approach actively dos not want to be scientific so often is criticised for being unfalsifiable 👍. I would include this in a large paragraph about criticising the research methods in which you could include a number of problems. Hope that helps.