🛑 DDR5 Timings Vs Frequency, Whats Faster? 🛑
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
- ► framechasers.org/ - Discord and Support
► framechasers.org/consulting - Consulting
► framechasers.org/ready-to-ship/ - Max OC Bundles
► / chasersframe - Twitter
► kick.com/framechasers - Stream
► jufesdebecket?i... - Instagram
Join the community over on Kick and discord to talk tech and play some games with fellow frame chasers Saturdays 12PM PST.
#DDR5 #AMD #Warzone - Ігри
too bad i'm 4 DIMM'ing for the 192GB 💀
I went back to 96gb because the slowdown was REALLY noticeable in latency sensitive applications. At least there's second gen optane for swap memory.
I'm going to wait until 128GB DDR5 is cheap as hell like 32GB of DDR4 is now.
What's the explanation behind having 192GB? Workstation or a server?
@@battlephenom8508 workstation
@@battlephenom8508 bigger number.
with new platforms memory configs are going to change for the better - a good thread to follow long term as new bios and steppings come out things are going to change and faster memory will emerge also plus get cheaper as they ramp up production
Thanks again
hmm, what frequency on 15th gen will be equivalent to 14th gen 7200-7400, so basically that has a big change of just working (sweet spot)
my motherboard z790-E rog ... i have 13900k Ram 7200 with old bios the vid at reach max 1.41v i update my bios today and i try intel baseline at reach +1.5 is that normal and safe? i change it to asus OC and i sync all P cores 55 my vid between 1.41-1.46v max at reach1.465v sometime is that safe spot?
Does this more fps?
i run 7200c32 and the latency is quite low
8400 doesnt have the IMC at 4200MHz lol
Can anyone tell me which sticks i need for my Asus Z790 Dark Hero motherboard with i9 14900k?? Im thinking about 4 times 32gb 7200 but i don't know if that is any good and just want it to run safe. Ow and i got the Asus rog strix 4090 oc edition.
Wheres the link to best ram kits? For A die
FrameChasers.org
I think is interesting what yo present, but i recommend you to check the following buildzoid video, the title is : "RANT: THE CAS LATENCY TIMING DOESN'T MATTER AS MUCH AS YOU THINK IT DOES" Thats related for DDR5 ram not for the DDR4, where the latency it matters a lot .
ASUS Z790-AYW OC WIFI - will there be a review? ^^
Ah nope, that board isn’t interesting
@@FrameChasers why not? There are 2 versions, the one with OC in name is 2 dimm atx board
@@FrameChasers poor take its a budget full atx 2 dimmer
only board id currently consider to replace my ageing z370 platform
@@bigcazza5260who’s gonna pay for it
@@FrameChasers everyone who asks me what board to buy for 12th-14th gen
3800 c14 > 4000 c16 in my system any day
timings go to shit if u push too far as does stability
Dude your ram videos are really good!! No one is this informative about ram like this. I think you're the go to guy for ram guides honestly. Keep up the amazing work man, ur videos are something else.
You need 10,000 hz otherwise you can't compete... Against a 7 year old on Xbox
Frequency always faster😊
Jufus, that music is too loud, brewski
I don't want to listen to a woman singing over you, bro, I just wanna listen to content
I feel like we are on a brink of us seeing those 10,000mhz ram coming out for a standardized ram frequencies that will no longer be novelty.
Also, my speculation DDR6 will be release later next year, because we are already on GDDR7 for 5090 coming out
Ah my bad I forgot to clean it up in post, I’ve been so busy and rushing everything 😢
You've hit all the silicon lotteries if you have a CPU that can hit those IMC frequencies. I think you meant to half those IMC frequencies for gear 2.
Um try change the ddr gear down dude
Lol
cpu and ram tuning is only one half. windows 11 itself has a lot of points to optimize. you are able to get nice and smooth frametimes out of old stuff too. just need a new basic windows that doesn't steal ressources for dumb shit. back to the roots.
You are very smart, no need to swear.
Whats Faster? Always Intel!
As in what scenario ?
Look at benchmarks done by users using Google you'll find intel typically is faster slightly per core and max clock speeds on avg is higher however lowest clocked speeds can also be the lowest as well.
@@pwrcowfeederThe reality nobody here wants to talk about 😂
@@pwrcowfeeder literally zero real proofs of degrading man, I tried to find something and it is nothing there. Maybe you have at least 1?
6400MHz CL 26
7200MHz CL 30
8000MHz CL 36
Would be nice to have a review on like 10 game to see if it make that much difference to switch CPU, that have bad IMC or motherboard. Don't think performance are so much different for 3 memory Speed & timing like written. Ok Maybe we can add for fun 8600MHz CL 40 but only few people with rare cpu can acheive that stable.
Jesus this is the type of content that the self proclaimed unbiased reviewer is pushing.
Just yaps about memory frequency, timings memory controller etc and shows 0 factual proof like benchmarks.
Even if it’s all correct which I’m not trying to question you should really focus on quality and examples(benchmarks) as that goes a lot further than some yapping.
It's not really needed to prove at this point, you can see countless of reviews on Gamers Nexus and Hardware Unboxed channel proving this
I think there no need to be mad that he is not providing proof, because people on this channel usually know this.
It's not incorrect statement, I can attest to it.
You should not focus on frequency as the main priority, you should focus on getting both the timing and frequency to the best settings. As fast of the timings, and as high of frequency as you can get to stable with zero app crashes
I have mine set to 7733mhz with Apex Encore Z790, but I could do 8000, but at times some app can crash, but it passed in TestMem 5
I think it's been proven as far as timing since DDR3 that timing matters much greater, and only then frequency.
I will take CL34 and 7600mhz, than CL40 and 8000 mhz
You can feel it in competitive shooters as mouse click to action latency, and your fps pacing in ms will be greater with CL40
I managed to get CL36 with 7733 mhz and it was as good as i could get without bumping to CL38
So, my only disagreement with Jufus is that timing matters more than memory speed (within reason of course)
Playing on 6400 mhz and CL28 is still significantly slower in mouse clicks than CL36 and 7733mhz
SIGNIFICANTLY feel wise
@@gamebenchmarks9715I’d like to see some benchmarks on your statement. As far as I can tell 6400 28 will be faster latency but lower data rate. Marginally 8.75ns vs 8.79ns, now not sure how you can SIGNIFICANTLY feel 0.04ns….The difference would be like 2-3fps at 300+ fps, that’s 0.03MS….So I call BS, your 6400cl28 must not have been stable in order for you to notice ANY difference, even professional testing equipment can’t repeatedly record 0.03ms deviations. This is all peen size talk, whose got the fastest ram, just like the AMD boys that say they can run over 9600mhz but change the polling rate so it’s actually 1/2 that but in AIDA or HWInfo it shows as 9600mhz.
@@radugrigoras Yes and no. While the absolute latency of the dimm itself can be matched or even beaten at lower frequencies, the total system latency is dependent on higher frequency speeding up a slower operating system. There is also the option of trimming down OS activity, reducing total system latency as a result.