i don't remember how it was deinterlaced but the avermedia is not deinterlacing it was just used for capture hdmi .... but that quality is not great actualy there are relatively cheap and better way to digitise vhs You should check VHS-decode project it basicaly capture the signal from the tape by directly bypassing the hardware and decode the video on the computer github.com/oyvindln/vhs-decode as for deinterlacing it's better to use a good algorithm i recommand using the nnedi deinterlacing filter in ffmpeg (if you know how to use ffmpeg) ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-all.html#nnedi (to my opinion it's the best available currently) there also w3fdif that do a good (but not as good) deinterlacing and is mutch quicker to process. :) i should reupload better vhs or Laserdisc Capture!
Watch in 1440P for Best quality!! like or comments if you thinks i have made a good works or explain why if you don't
Looks great. Is the Avermedia capture card doing the deinterlacing, or the OSSC?
i don't remember how it was deinterlaced but the avermedia is not deinterlacing it was just used for capture hdmi .... but that quality is not great actualy there are relatively cheap and better way to digitise vhs You should check VHS-decode project it basicaly capture the signal from the tape by directly bypassing the hardware and decode the video on the computer
github.com/oyvindln/vhs-decode
as for deinterlacing it's better to use a good algorithm i recommand using the nnedi deinterlacing filter in ffmpeg (if you know how to use ffmpeg) ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-all.html#nnedi
(to my opinion it's the best available currently) there also w3fdif that do a good (but not as good) deinterlacing and is mutch quicker to process. :)
i should reupload better vhs or Laserdisc Capture!
No 50 fps, like how it would be?