There is music behind this video that was added intentionally. I like it and find that it adds some casual spunk and good vibes. If it’s not for you, that’s ok. Either push through, or catch the next one. Thank you for your interest either way. 👍 In today's Ramble, I'm providing commentary on some of your spiciest knitting/fiber arts-related opinions, also known as "hot takes". Buckle up and open your mind and get ready for some opinionated banter. Please know: we are all entitled to our opinion. If you do not agree or share my opinions, that is ok. You are welcome here regardless and are also welcome to provide your own opinion in the comments of this video. However, be nice. ❤
I’m going to chip in here with a hot take on background music. I’ll start by saying that I’ve noticed a preponderance of neuro diverse people in the knitting community. Hyperfocus on one craft, desire to talk about it ad infinitum and to knit for many hours in the day are common tropes amongst knitting podcasters and their audiences. I’ve also seen physical behaviours consistent with stimming amongst the many podcasters on this topic that I watch. This is not to say that all knitting podcasters are neurodiverse, of course. Only that some appear to be and some podcasters profess to being ADHD or neuro diverse, commenting on the positive ways knitting plays off or plays into their dispositions towards the world, from being able to make clothes exactly as you want them, without seams and in fabrics you tolerate well, to the repetitive and soothing way that the knit stitch acts on the soul. At the same time, hypersensitivity to sound is documented as a common challenge for neurodiverse people. It is thought that the ‘sensory traffic controller’ in the brains of children and adults with auditory sensitivity pays much more attention to sounds than expected. Instead of ignoring sounds that aren’t important, it keeps attending to them. This means children and adults with sound sensitivity are more easily distracted to noises in the environment. It can also decrease their ability to focus on the relevant noise (e.g. their teacher talking). When this happens, the amygdala can become more quickly overwhelmed by sounds. This could be because it finds it more difficult to process all of the noises at once. It could also be because paying attention to all of the audio information in the space, it is processing a lot more information at the same time. It feels like one of those traffic jams where all of the cars are beeping their horns. The brain cannot process all of the information and will trigger a fight, flight or freeze response. So, the child or adult might hit out, run away, shut down. It is important to remember that their response is rooted in an automatic nervous system response rather than ‘bad behaviour’ or just being snarky or difficult. None of this is to say that background music should not be used and I think your point, Tayler that you will sometimes use it because you like it and that we can choose to grin and bear it or skip the video is a valid take. Also, music will not affect every ADHD person in the same way and many will not find it a problem. I just wanted to raise this point so that people read those comments with some compassion rather than thinking of them as just grumpy or overly critical. If people who this effects keep listening despite their discomfort, it’s because they really love you. If they comment it may be because they are scared it will become your norm and they’ll lose the joy of listening to you.
@@verylikecherylI Know There Are A Lot Of People In America Who Are Pretending To Be Neurodivergent... Because Being "Different" Is Now The Hip Thing. I See It All Around Me In My Generation. If Most Of These People Were Really Neuro's Or On Any Spectrum, We'd Be Constantly Surrounded By Mini Meltdowns, Everything Would Have To Come To A Standstill Each Time A Tic Began, Or Stimming Happened... Because As You Say It's A Subconscious Action, Not A Chosen Behavior Right? My Coworker Is Heavily Medicated, And Still Retains Her Facial Tics In Moments Of Stress She Lashes Out. She Is Authentic, And We Do Not Stop The Entire Restaurant Every Time She Has An Episode... Life Goes On, And Asking Everyone To Stop Or Change Themselves For A Small Segment Of The Population Which Is Truly Different Is Like Saying Because There Are 100 Lepers, We Must All Sequester Ourselves In Different Colonies, Or Stay Inside. That's Just My Opinion Though.
All good! Especially size inclusion discussion, Teach a knitter to alter, size up or down, do the math, than you. an knit ANY PATTERN. Not everything will be done for you!
As the child of a crafter, the hoarding of yarn, fabric, patterns etc was a barrier to enjoying time with my mother. Having to go buy new things for the new project when the house was stuffed with loads of unused supplies and half done patterns and walking around craft stores for hours instead of spending actual quality time with my mom has stuck with me as an adult when I do crafts. Don't let the craft/hobby/collection own you, it's fun to explore your hobbies and the new project is always the most exciting but if you share your space with other people remember that they may not love the craft as much as they love you. Make space for both.
I think this is a really interesting and important perspective. You’re absolutely right. And I guess it goes to what the individual said regarding having the space. “Having space” is subjective. It can mean one thing to one person and something very different to the person with whom that space is shared. Thank you for sharing your experience. ❤️
This almost reads as "as the child of a mother who crafted with undiagnosed ADHD or autism" as mass starting and never finishing projects is a common problem.
@@FoxInTheStudio Knowing my mom, it's not that, and either way my point stands that your behavior as a crafter effects the people you live with so the idea that there is no such thing as too much yarn maybe be true for the crafter but not for their family who has to live with the hoarding.
My children and grandies often come to shop at my free store for beads and yarn. I am clear at the start what is up for grabs and what already has a customer. Fortunately/unfortunately, there is always lots to choose from. Lol
@@FoxInTheStudioI think this is me. I haven’t been aware of the effect it could have on my daughter in the future and now plan to think deeply about my relationship with knitting and yarn and my kid. I am 99% sure I have undiagnosed ASD but getting a diagnosis is so difficult so I haven’t explored that yet. I have a large collection of started but unfinished projects (along with many more definite symptoms of neurodivergence).
I think the thing to remember, re: snobbery/"cheap yarn is trash"/etc., is that inexpensive yarn makes the craft accessible for people who don't have the funds for pricier yarn. And there are plenty of those people. So while it's perfectly valid to have an opinion about the type of yarn you prefer to use, let's not gatekeep the craft in such a way that excludes people who don't have the same level of discretionary spending.
Melissa I agree with you. I understood Taylor’s point that people are allowed to like nice things & they shouldn’t be called snobs for that. However, there are people who are snobby & make comments in yarn shops when people are selecting less expensive yarns & tools. People have different budgets and that should be respected.
At the moment, I am knitting an acrylic blanket, a cotton sweater, a varigated shrug with yarn by an indie dyer, and socks.....so I think I hit a lot of those spicy notes. But I gotta do what makes me happy!
Thanks for standing up for the colourwork yokes👌 As a Scandinavian it’s always uncomfortable to see people talk about our traditions as if it’s merely a trend made for modern social media
Monetizing my items is a very sore spot for me. I knit hats for charity. You wouldn't believe how many people want me to sell them so I can have more money to buy more yarn for my charity. I know without a doubt that if I sold the hats ... yes I'd have more money...but I would lose my desire to continue my charity knitting. When I need more yarn, I always get donations that is needed. Sometimes it's scarchy RHSS. Sometimes it's old, very old yarn. But always well received by me for the generosity. Yarn stash saves the day by doubling up the thinner yarns to make up either DK or Worsted weight. The veterans and homeless appreciate anything that comes their way. That's my focus. Great podcast today. Thanks.
There is absolutely a point to short sleeve or even sleeveless sweaters. Your core is the most important part of your body to keep warm because it contains all of the vital organs. If your core starts to get cold, your brain will prioritize your core over your extremities and send more warm blood there, and you may end up with frost bite. However, if you keep your core nice and toasty, your brain won’t need to prioritize it.
I have 4 sideways related hot takes: 1) the reason that people need to keep making new socks is because we are using wool from the worst sheep breed to make yarn. Such a big percentage of yarns offered as sock yarns are made of super wash Merino/nylon. Merino is super soft, but it is not durable at all. The worst choice for socks. There are wools from other sheep breeds that would last way longer. 2) socks do not need nylon/plastic in them at all. Nor do they need to be superwash. Just choose yarn from an appropriate breed. 3) not all people who choose not to use nylons, or prefer if other people would rely less on plastic yarns do it because they are snobs, or even have a lot of money. Some of us think our over reliance on plastic is not a good choice for the environment, and are willing to make choices. Environmentally friendly options don't have to be super expensive, but I might not make something in Aran or bulky yarn, as it would make my project to expensive. I learned to spin (on a spindle) and if I want an aran weight yarn, I spin for it. Buying fleece can be much cheaper than yarn, and the time spent spinning definitely slows down my knitting speed, and therefore my spending. 4) The environmental consequences of our hobby are not discussed enough.
I agree that there are better breeds than Merino for socks. Literally anything other than Merino is better for socks. I could do a whole video on sheep breeds ideal for sock yarn. As for not requiring Nylon, of course you don’t need it. However if it means the socks will last longer, some may find that economical, the views some have on Nylon’s environmental impact notwithstanding. As for the snobbery discussion, and like I emphasize in the video: it doesn’t matter what you prefer and why. It’s the tendency some have for making others feel less-than for using something different that may or may not constitute snobbery. In regards to the environmental impact of this craft not being discussed enough, what issues concern you most that you find to be under-acknowledged?
@@WaraiShiro Well, if you have a chance to try any of the Dorset breeds, their yarn is strong, stretchy, and very resistant to felting. Not easy to get, mainly because we as knitters are not asking for it, and the farmers don't know how good their wool is for socks. Many of them are literally throwing away their wool, because it is more expensive to bring it to the wool board, then what they get paid for it. Any of the " Down" breeds is good for socks, Romney is great and pretty soft, but still very durable. I have knitted quite a few socks without acrylic, and many of them last a lot longer than my yarns WITH acrylic. BFL is often mentioned, but that yarn is quite silky and not very stretchy, so it loses it's shape quicker, and it does felt.
@@WOOLNEEDLESHANDS well, mixing acrylic into your yarn makes the yarn no longer bio degradable, when one of the big pluses of wool is that it is fully compostable. Our addiction to merino, which doesn't often get any push back, means that many of us are not using yarns or wool from closer to home, even if that yarn would be a better choice for the project at hand. I personally find it quite shocking that we have 65 native breeds in the UK where I live, but when I go to a yarn show in the UK, at least 90 percent is Merino, with or without plastic, which is a breed that does not grow well in the UK. So we are shipping wool from Australia, New Zealand or the Peruvian highlands, whilst the farmers in our own area throw away perfectly good wool, because there is no demand. That's just one example... Hey, you asked for salty opinions! :-) I am happy to see that there are more people who start to ask questions, for instance if their wool is mulesing free, but who is asking about the mileage your yarn made to get to you? Or how eco friendly the dyes used in their beautiful skeins are? By putting people who are questioning the status quo in the corner of being elite or snobbish, we muffle a conversation I think should be had. Can we not point out to our fellow crafters, that our choices have environmental impact?
Hey please give me tips on what sock yarn to look for and why? I would 100% prefer wool only sock yarns rather than the mixed but don't feel confident enough in being able to choose the right yarn for it. Thank you!
I have one opinion that im careful sharing, cause most other knitters i know disagree. But here it comes: i feel the patterns for sweaters and hats havent changed at all the last 30 years, and the needlecraft community could need some new inspiration. At least in norway. 🤫
I both knit and crochet. Knitting tools are DEFINITELY more expensive! I can go to any craft store and pick up a decent hook for a few bucks. I’ve invested in 4 different interchangeable needle sets and still need to purchase more stuff all the time.
Hot take: just because I know how to knit and crochet does NOT mean I am obligated to teach you for free, or at all, if I would rather spend my spare time on my own projects.
100% agree! I don’t have the patience anymore (have done it in the past) nor will I knit or sew (mend, hem etc.) something on demand. I tell people UA-cam has loads of tutorials or if you’re lucky enough to have local teachers pay for lessons (or if not there’s online courses one can pay for too).
A tip a yarn dyer told me its easy to replace contrasting heels and toes when they get holes. Either keep some remaining yarn to re-knit the heel/toe or pick a new color to make your socks mismatched in a funky way.
I've never heard someone called a snob for using nice materials. I've only heard that when they're saying "You MUST use expensive yarn" or "REAL crafters use wool" or "Acrylic is for amateurs" or something else that heavily implies you're basic and less-than for not choosing expensive materials and tools. Bringing it up this way makes it seem like anytime someone uses nice yarn they get attacked, but that is just not the behavior I've been seeing in my feeds. Maybe that's anecdotal, but changing the context the way you did makes it seem like the "problem" is the people who call out snobs for their behavior rather than the snobbish behavior that's... frankly kinda all over the place in yarn crafting social media. What I DO see is people insisting you MUST use only the finest stuff... and you can get it in the link in their bio. Everyone has a motive, but some motives are much more sinister than others. If you really think people who use acrylic or plastic hooks or needles are beneath you, then go with god and spend your money as you see fit and don't let my plastic-y door hit you on the way out. However if you're just doing that to sell more stuff... that's just gross, because you're not just a snob, you're an unprincipled snob.
Like I mention in this video regarding my concept of snobbery, using nice things does not make a person a snob. Using nice things while also making others feel less than for choosing not to use those same things is snobbery. Which is the sentiment you’re expressing here as well. I think folks who share their interest and tendency to choose nice things and expensive notions, etc. tend to get lumped into that category of “snob”. In fact, some wear that “badge” proudly. However I think that assuming a person is a snob simply because they use and promote nice things (“like nice things” as I put it here) is unnecessary and rude. This is a real hot button topic for a lot of folks. I’ve personally been labeled a snob for sharing pricey things that I personally use and like, yet anyone who knows me either in person or from my channel knows how inaccurate that is because I’m not a complete jerk about it and would never belittle someone for having different budget restrictions. If you’ve not seen evidence of this, then that’s great. Unfortunately that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. In fact when I reached out to folks asking for their hot takes, it was a majority of the ones I received. It’s a common gripe in many artistic/niche communities. It’s nothing new. 👍
In regards to content creators using affiliate marketing to promote products that they use and like (and which come at no additional cost to their audience), that’s a means of making an income for something they are otherwise doing for free. I don’t consider that gross or sinister by any means. Just my hot take.
Hot takes: knitting books today are looking much thicker but are made with half of the book filled with back story and aestetic instagram, and the patterns are stretched out over so many pages. Like - I want patterns from knitting books. Not the designer's full personal back story... That I can get from youtube. Also, on the physical copy sharing hot take - it is very seldom when you share a book with someone that you make a printed photocopy of the whole thing, meaning you physically cannot read the book when it is lended out. This is what makes it legal or not.
oh yeah no 100%. im only 18, but the knitting book my grandma bought me when i was 6/7 has more content in it than most knitting books i find in craft stores lmao
Yes srsly I go and buy vintage patterns from my favourite second hand for like 10cents each, printed on single or a double sheet of paper, simple, concrete, no fuzz. I also got a booklet with like 100 crochet patterns/structures which fit in a small magazine. I don't want 1kg books with no content :P@@bellac6311
Personally I’m a crocheter but I agree 100% I’ve gotten so much from a single book I got from my grandma when I started, I’d recommend checking out preused/thrifted books, especially if you’re looking for simple basic stitches
Thank you for doing this video! It was done with so much respect and care. In today’s culture opinions are thrown like confetti (mostly confetti consisting of nails 😂) It would be nice if everyone learned to “scroll on” instead of adding their two cents. Your videos are always a joy to watch.
Thank you so much Shannyn (this is such a cool spelling). I agree with you and I’m so glad this video came across positive and without judgement. That means a lot. ❤️
Listening to this on my drive home - I love to hear these hot takes! I've gotta jump in about Sugar & Cream, though. I have made at least two sweaters with it that have lasted - get ready for it - more than 30 years. I was in my teens/20s in the 1980s and folks, yarn selection was NOT what it is today! First off, not as many people knitted, and secondly, you pretty much had cotton yarn and acrylic yarn, and a little bit of wool from very-few-and-far-between local yarn shops or by mail order. Some of us were also on a budget, and yarns like Sugar & Cream were what we could afford. So I'm gently pushing back here -- you can totally make garments with Sugar & Cream that will wear for years and years. AND - bonus - garments made with S&C do NOT grow and droop like some cotton knits do.
Honestly thank you for this, one thing people are not remembering is that you have to shop in a budget, I'm 18 I can't afford high-end cotton yarn so i have to work with what I can afford and the take feels kinda classist
As someone who crochets as my primary craft I can confirm that you will spend more on yarn, on average, for a project than you would knitting that same project instead. Crochet really, really eats yarn. However, I will say that I was pretty shocked at how much more expensive knitting needle sets are vs crochet hook sets when I decided I wanted to try knitting.
I'm all for opinions... it's just when someone insists that what is right for them must be right for you ... that's when i get offended. Loved this video and all of the comments.
I do both. Crochet GOBBLES yarn. I can’t afford top shelf yarn for every crochet project. I knit almost exclusively with “expensive” yarn. I recently bought a knit sweater’s worth of indie dyed yarn for less than a crochet afghan’s worth of big box acrylic yarn. As far as tools, like in any trade, I could accomplish a lot with just a few cheap tools, or I could spend a fortune on every single top-of-the-line tool that exists, and I’ve leaned both ways over the course of my yarning career. My personal crochet hooks have cost me less than my knitting needles, but I crochet very little compared to how much knitting I do. Whatever my yarn budget is, I will spend it all either way, so idk why this argument even matters!
It’s absolutely not typical for hand knit socks to get holes after only wearing three times. Use sturdy sock yarn such as Payton’s Kroy , avoid Merino, cashmere, and other soft fibers, and knit at 8 stitches per inch and you’ll have socks that will hold up for years. Then learn to darn when the inevitable holes appear to extend the life of your socks for a few more years.
I thought this was odd too. I use wys, opal, felici and the like and wear a pair every work day. They last fine. Although i do know some people (for whatever reason) wear socks hard and even store bought dont last very long for them. 🤷🏻♀️
On the subject of the cost of tools - yeah, I have spent less and own fewer crochet hooks. I can pull the hook out of a project if I need it for another purpose. That is harder to do with knitting needles. But I knit more than I crochet, so having a few dozen needles in my house matters to me. Straights, DPNs, circs, interchangables in lots of sizes..... But as Taylor said - knitting uses less yarn, so there is that aspect.
My favorite crocheted item ever is an acrylic blanket that my grandmother made. And i dont just love it because she made it. Its beautiful, in my favorite colors, and its held up to 30 plus years of constant use. So acrylic isnt trash unless you make it into trash. Do i use it for socks? No. Do i love it for sweaters? ❤ sometimes. No one should be shamed for choosing acrylic yarn when they want to. Half the clothing on the rack is acylic or acrylic blend. Whats the difference?
I choose natural fibers because I don't like the clothing on the rack - synthetic fibers make me sweaty. I try to choose things that are better for the planet and that feel better or wear nicer. As far as I can tell, there is a spectrum of quality and price for synthetic fibers, and I've seen 100% synthetic yarns that cost more than 100% natural yarns. I don't think it's being snobbish to ask people to think about their yarn choices, anymore than it's snobbish to suggest someone recycle a can or bottle once in a while instead of always throwing it in the trash.
I try to give people the benefits of the yarn I chose rather than tell them how fancy it is. “I chose such and such blend so it’ll be super comfortable for you and be relatively easy to care for” over “ I used this specialty yarn from a specialty shop”. I get to talk up the yarn without putting them off 😂
Just another opinion on lending out patterns....If I have purchased a pattern from an independent designer, I will NOT lend it out. I paid for the pattern and being a designer is not exactly a road to riches! I will of course happily direct requests to Ravelry or wherever I purchased the pattern. I recently had a very casual aquaintence ask to borrow a sewing pattern I purchased online, spent probably an hour printing out and taping together, etc., etc., I want to support independent hard working designers and this is the best way I know of to do that.
The monetizing comment is so true. It just sucks that most people who dont make things compliment your makes by saying, "wow, you should sell those!" Like its the ultimate compliment to say your item would be worth money to someone else. I know they mean it well, but i dont want my pieces to look like they came from a mindless machine. Thats not a compliment to me and it just makes for an awkward conversation if they press the issue and i have to explain that i dont want to suck the joy out of my hobby by making a million of the same thing for no money because im competing with a machine in Asia somewhere.
Not all sweaters look good on all bodies, 100% true. I have narrow, sloping shoulders and a big bust, and yoke sweaters of any kind makes me look horrible. It de-emphasizes my already narrow shoulders and somehow manages to hide my bust as well. I really wish I could make a nice colorwork Scandinavian sweater, but I am not going to put all that work into it to have it sit in a drawer.
I'm a crocheter. I keep a list of things people have said they would like, and I work on projects as I get the inspiration. But I also take into consideration how a person might appreciate a handmade gift. I don't want to spend hours, days, sometimes months, working on a piece only for it to be never used, or worse, abused and destroyed. And I also refuse to take commissions or payments. For me, it takes the joy out of making.
I love this Ramble! My personal spicy knitting opinions are 1. I hate magic loop. 2. I hardly ever swatch and 3. I hardly ever block. But I also don't knit a lot of sweaters. I am a yarn snob and want to use the nicest yarn so for me to buy 8 or 9 or 10 skeins of such and such yarn to knit a specific sweater, it's cost prohibitive. Oh and using a knitting machine isn't real knitting... I said it...
It seems like a lot of these opinions arise out of people paying too much attention to what others are doing instead of just doing their own thing and being happy with that. :) No, knitting doesn't have to be spectacular, though it certainly can be. But some of us are also process knitters, we do it for relaxation. I work at home, I'm old, I'm not trying to impress anyone, and I'm just not that worried about having spectacular garments to wear. A few, yes, for special occasions, but I mostly wear tee shirts. I do knit, and I love what I knit, and I also knit for my cats, who are the most appreciative little guys ever. It doesn't matter what I knit, a plain utility bag, a blanket, or something that is just like a large swatch. As soon as they see it, they want to lie on it, and then give me this look (because they know I made it), as if to say, "You are a goddess!" Appreciation doesn't get more pure than that. Take pleasure in knitting, but don't let it be to please other people you don't even know. Please, please, people, do it for the joy of it, in whatever way you think best for you and those you love!
It was such an inspiring video! Thank you for your benevolence and humor. I would like to add something about sizes and shapes (sorry about my english, I'm a french speaker). A French designer that I know has made patterns with a lot of adjustment possibilities and very complete guides to work them. It was a lot of work, so she had to upgrade her prices. It was also not as easy as the average patrern for the knitters. It required measurments (not only for the chest) and some math. People complained about it so she had to stop and go back to something simpler. It’s difficult for a designer to find the balance between what people want and the effort they are willing to make to have it.
This is very interesting and I’m so glad you included it here. And what you say here at the very bottom is just it. It’s a difficult balance to be sure. Thank you so much for watching Sara!
Oh, opinions.... I used to have a quote about them on my office door: "You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant." (Harlan Ellison) Sorry, but far too many of my students were comfortable voicing their opinions and had not the slightest clue what they were talking about. Yes, we're all entitled to believe and think what we want. The trouble comes when people voice those thoughts. Controversial opinions are (IMO 🙂) fodder for very interesting conversations.
Hiya librarian who works with copyright to an extent here, wanted to ad a little bit on the sharing of patterns and book comparison. The issue is publishing. Same as with books, you cannot copy and share parts of copyrighted content without the authors permission or a license to do so (copyright does vary based on the country). I would see no harm in sharing a print pattern with someone for their own use (similarly to what you would have done with a print book), but if you were to send pdfs to people/multiple people I would see that as breach of copyright. Also in terms of support of designers, I am pretty sure knitwear design isn't an extremely profitable business, so personally I'd prefer to support the designers by paying for their patterns. Plenty of wonderful free patterns on rarely as well, for anyone who might not have the budget.
Listening to you talking about socks today made me realize I've been subjecting myself to the sunk cost fallacy. I spent so much time learning how to knit socks, trying every different type of heel and toe, that I felt obligated to keep knitting socks. I'm sitting here watching this, with a sock in my hand, and I'm not happy knitting this sock. I'm tired of knitting socks, and knowing that they're just going to get holes in them and fall apart is pretty much the final straw. I'm just going to go back to working on my sweater and be happy.
I'd like to share my perspective on the idea that everyone should learn how to grade patterns so they can always make the perfect size/shape of garment for their body. I think it would be ideal and very cool if everyone could learn that skill, but I don't think it's fully realistic. I am a plus size knitter, so this skill would be useful for me. But I also have a chronic illness that limits my energetic output and impacts my ability to learn, and learning to grade patterns sounds cognitively difficult and like it would take significant time/energy. So for me (and I imagine for others too, like people who don't like math), learning to grade patterns is not on the table. I would also add that the pattern being graded is part of the service I am paying for when I buy a pattern. Lastly, I think it's very important for knitting patterns to come in a size inclusive range to make it clear that we as a knitting community embrace knitters of all sizes.
I appreciate your perspective. And I would begin by saying that I think it would be great (ideal, even) if every person's size and shape were included in a knitting pattern (in a way that did not detract from the readability of the pattern--which is a formatting concern some folks have). However, like I mention here (in this video) that may not be feasible or realistic. We need to examine what is the most reasonable/realistic/feasible "solution" to address this issue, and in regards to what you say here about the difficulty some may have with learning this process and all that I mention in the video, we are at an impasse. Both of our options seem unrealistic to an extent. However I acknowledge that you are not suggesting that a designer include EVERY possible size and I understand that you feel that the inclusion of a wide range of sizes in general is enough for a design or designer to be considered inclusive and embracing knitters of all sizes. And I am not suggesting that folks do math that is any more difficult than that already required to calculate gauge or determine which size to knit from available sizes based on body measurements. In fact, one of the resources I include in the description of this video demonstrates how to plug and play your gauge information and body dimensions into a spreadsheet that will do the math for you, which would seem to be a very valuable tool for accommodating those who have a difficult time understanding math or cannot, as you say, learn the process due to the cognitive demand. But, for argument's sake, what about those who still lie outside of that "inclusive" size range and do not have a chronic illness that hinders their ability to learn (or similar disability)? Perhaps learning to grade a pattern is out of reach for some, like yourself, however for those who will invariably be left out of a specified size range at some point, and for those who are willing and/or able to learn the process of grading for their size, this seems to be a very viable option if they would like to have access to most/all knitting patterns. And if this information were provided within the pattern, in addition to an inclusive range of sizes (either as a link to resources like those I share here, or a tutorial), it would be clear (if not implied) that this designer is aware of not only their limitations to provide size options for EVERYONE, but also their appreciation for knitters of all sizes. I also believe that before we can classify a designer/pattern as "size inclusive" or criticize them for not being "size inclusive", we need to develop a standard for what is considered "size inclusive". What I illustrate here and in my previous comments is what I would suggest demonstrates size inclusivity, however I would be interested in learning what others consider "size inclusive" as it relates to the range of sizes offered. In terms of what we should receive for the money we pay, that is subjective as we all value different aspects of things that we purchase and are unaware as consumers how the designer has broken down their cost/price for their design. And most knitting patterns have been graded, just not necessarily to the extent that accommodates everyone (which is exactly the issue). For you, you want to see a large range of sizes that at least includes your own and demonstrates "size inclusivity", and that's valid. For some, they may just want a design that has clear instructions and photos. Different strokes for different folks. I discuss this with additional detail with folks in the previous comments below and I invite you to participate in those conversations as well.
@@WOOLNEEDLESHANDS There can be varying degrees of size inclusivity. I think the most basic standard by which we can determine if a pattern is size inclusive is if it offers plus sizes as well as straight sizes. A pattern that offers only S/M/L is not size inclusive (because the average woman's clothing size in the US is a 16/18). A pattern that offers up to size 3x may be considered somewhat size inclusive, while a pattern that goes up to 5x is even more inclusive. I recently purchased the Degen Think Tank pattern which offers up to a size 3x, but the designer has stated that she will grade the pattern up for anyone who needs to make a size larger than a 3x. The Degen Think Tank pattern also offers 2 different sets of instructions for smaller chests vs. larger chests. I feel that these pattern features make it very size inclusive. We agree that including the exact size and shape of every person on earth in a knitting pattern isn't feasible. That's not my definition of size inclusivity (I've never heard anyone define it this way). But you ask the question, what is a realistic/feasible "solution" to humans being so many different sizes and shapes? The examples I listed above have been considered reasonable/feasible solutions by pattern designers. I think that individual knitters learning to grade patterns for themselves could be a solution that is implemented when the types of solutions I have listed above aren't sufficient. But I do think that the solutions I have listed above should be the primary focus. I don't think expecting every single knitter to learn pattern grading is feasible and I don't think it could serve as a main solution in the way you stated in the video. I'm not exactly sure what you're saying your version of size inclusivity looks like - It sounds like you might be saying that you feel that for a pattern to be considered size inclusive, it should include an "inclusive range of sizes" plus instructions on how to grade the pattern for sizes outside of that range. Do you mean a pattern should range from say an XS to a 5X and then also have instructions for grading outside of those sizes? Because if so, I'm on board with that. But that sounds very different than what you originally said in the video. Originally, you said that all knitters should learn to grade patterns so we can knit any pattern in our specific size/shape, which makes it sound like 1) the knitter would have to learn the process of pattern grading on their own, not with instructions in each individual pattern, and 2) like pattern makers writing size inclusive patterns isn't part of the solution. Please do clarify. Ultimately, individual pattern makers will have different standards of how size inclusive they are when they make patterns (and how much extra work they may be willing/able to do for the sake of size inclusivity). Individual knitters will have different standards of what patterns they consider size inclusive enough to buy.
@@haunted_poptart Thank you for your reply. I think that, though I understand where you're coming from here regarding degrees of size inclusivity, it is somewhat gray in that it doesn't provide a fair standard for designers and consumers. I think as a consumer, these degrees can be used as a metric for whether or not that pattern will work on an individual level and I think that's fine and expected, but right now the concept of "size inclusivity" is being used to either promote or demote (in a sense) particular designers (I have to believe that you know what I'm referring to here--), which given the fact that this is currently seen as fluid and varying in degree, is unfair. In this video, I state that rather than placing so much emphasis on asking designers to grade for (what is currently) an arbitrary number of sizes (as this number of sizes is as you say, varying), we should ask those who are knowledgable to teach us how to grade the patterns ourselves (in other words, learn how to grade patterns ourselves). I did not state that ALL knitters should learn to grade patterns, and though I did not state in the video that this should be included in a knitting pattern along with a range of sizes, I included that opinion in my previous reply here, as well as in all of my replies to previous commenters below. My statement in this video is not intended to mean that ALL emphasis be placed on teaching knitters to do the grading themselves rather than designers providing sizes, but that SOME of the emphasis and energy going into the size inclusivity movement ought to be placed on teaching knitters to individualize patterns using their own resources (and I further add in my initial reply to you) or, ideally, resources provided by the designer, so that in addition to offering a range of sizes (which is the current expectation) patterns are also, in any given case, accessible because of their ability to be further modified. Now, realistically, designers providing this additional resource for grading their design isn't always going to be the case, if it is something that is possible at all. And if/when it is not the case, I argue that knitters should embrace pattern grading (like tailoring in sewing) so that they can access a pattern that does not offer their individual size. That is what I mean by my version of "size inclusivity". This is why having this conversation is important and why I am available in the comments section here to have it with you. You can glean more about my position (and I yours) by reading my (and your) further commentary as my videos are limited in time. However, I think you picked up on my version of size inclusivity in my reply as you paraphrased it quite well. To further clarify, since you asked, and like I mentioned to a previous commenter, I think providing a range of sizes in a knitting pattern is important and to an extent is feasible. However, I've seen and heard mention that even those patterns with 9 available sizes are not "size inclusive" and to some for various reasons, this may be true. But before we can use that as a metric for quality (of either the pattern or the designer) there should be a standard by which we make that judgement, should it be necessary. And as my video relates the status quo, we do not have a standard. So because we do not have this standard (yet), we should place some energy on educating knitters, or providing knitters with resources for grading patterns to fit their size so that they are still able to access any pattern, should their particular measurements not be included in the range. If a knitter chooses not to go that route, that's their choice. If a designer chooses not to grade a pattern to 10+ sizes, that's their choice. And until there is a standard for what is considered "size inclusive", I do not think labeling a designer as "size inclusive" or "not size inclusive" to publicly value or devalue them is fair (this is in reference to the climate surrounding this issue and not you individually). In regards to the designer you mention here grading their pattern to accommodate knitters of sizes beyond the 3X, I think that's very generous and I hope that that works for them for the long haul, and if it does, fantastic. But I would like to know how feasible that is for designers, generally speaking, because in that case, we are asking one person to accommodate the needs of potentially quite a few people. Whereas my proposed solution asks one person (the knitter) to do some additional work to meet the needs of one person (themselves) and a 1:1 relationship here far outweighs a 1:1+, in my opinion. I would be curious to know how much of an option that is for designers or how many designers would be willing to do that. And that of course depends on their customer base and volume. This may be feasible for designers with a smaller customer base, but for very popular designers with a high volume of pattern downloads, or even somewhat well-known designers, this could be impractical. I don't know, but I suspect. I hope this serves as further clarification.
@@WOOLNEEDLESHANDS I guess I'm confused by this "grade your own size" option. If it's so reasonable for a knitter to learn to grade their own size, because there are resources and it's not that hard, then why is it unreasonable to expect a designer to do this to begin with? Conversely, when people say that it's too hard for designers to address all sizes, then why should a knitter who's paying for a pattern have to learn to do so? I also think "designers can't address ALL shapes and sizes" is a little bit of a red herring. Designers already don't offer literally all sizes, in that a sweater may come in (say) bust sizes of 32", 36", 40", and 44', and a given knitter may have a size 38" bust. The designer doesn't offer the 38" bust knitter's exact size, but that's not a size inclusivity issue. Similarly, not everyone is going to like the way that every design feature looks on their own body shape - for instance, I don't think v-necks look good on my body shape, but that doesn't mean I think someone who designs a v-neck sweater has to include modifications for my body shape that make a v-neck into not a v-neck, b/c the v-neck is their design vision and there are plenty of non-v-neck sweaters out there. I also find the idea that we can never achieve inclusivity because there will always be SOMEONE outside a given range sort of mendacious, when there are plenty of designers out there who still don't design for anyone larger than an XL. Because we can never truly cater for every size, there's no point in improving matters at all? In size inclusivity, I'm looking for a garment that will actually fit on a wide range of bodies, no more, no less. And yes, "fit" in that context entails understanding that plus size bodies don't just expand in all directions at regular intervals from smaller sizes, so that for instance someone who's a dress size 24 doesn't have a neck that's twice as wide as someone who's a dress size 12, that kind of thing. But I'm not expecting something that is any more tailored to my specific shape than the 38" bust knitter is. Maybe one issue is vocabulary. Because to me, "grade" is a very technical term that implies recalculating an entire pattern (in the way that historical costumers often work from one pattern size taken from an extant garment and have to recreate the entire pattern in their size). But people of all sizes have been learning how to "modify" knitting patterns to make them fit their own proportions better for years and years. To name just a few examples, Amy Herzog has published multiple books on this topic; Kim O'Brien Evans and Patty Lyons regularly offer workshops on how to adapt patterns to fit your own specific proportions; Ysolda Teague provided great information about this back in 2011 in Little Red in the City. The major difference is that while those resources are great for knitters who are larger than the traditional knitting pattern size range, they are not *exclusive to* or *aimed at* larger knitters. They are for everyone because they recognize that not every pattern is going to work for every person's size/shape. That's not about size inclusivity; that's about personal style/comfort preference. Conversely, saying that the solution to size inclusivity is that knitters need to learn to grade their own patterns is, in effect, saying that larger knitters need to learn to grade their own patterns, because it's larger knitters who won't even have a foundation to start from. The 38" knitter can take the size 32-44 range pattern and *modify* it (they can knit the 36" on bigger needles/with thicker yarn, they can knit the 40" on smaller needles/with thinner yarn; they can do math to split the difference wrt to specific numbers of stitches), or they can just decide they want to wear it with less or more positive ease than written and call it day. But for a knitter with a 54" bust to *grade* a pattern that only goes up to a 44" bust is a much more monumental task. I guess maybe another way to put this is that *size* inclusivity and *shape* inclusivity aren't actually the same thing at all, and lumping them together makes size inclusivity seem like a nitpicky, impossible to achieve goal that shouldn't be catered to. No one designer can or should be expected to cater to every body shape; not all designs are going to work for all body shapes. And it makes sense for knitters to learn something about modifying patterns for their own body shapes. But that's very different from not being able to find a pattern than actually fits onto your body, which is what size inclusivity seeks to address, and isn't really fairly addressed by requiring larger bodied knitters to grade their own patterns to fit their size (on TOP of modifying patterns to fit their own shape). Especially if it's too hard to ask designers - who are trying to sell their patterns - to grade for larger sizes. (My apologies for the length of this, it's just something I feel VERY strongly about. Also, I focus on larger-bodied knitters here because that's what I know and think is a significant problem given the average size of American women, but the same holds for people looking for patterns below the smallest sizes, too.)
I'm so tired of the wool versus acrylic debate because why are we, the crafters, fighting amongst ourselves when we really should be critical of the companies selling acrylic yarns at wool prices? Acrylic yarn is very cheap to produce compared to wool, so what they're charging is exaggerated in that regard, but also since it's becoming the norm, I think fewer people question it simply because they aren't aware. Plus, wool and acrylic are not equals. They both have different properties and can't exactly replace each other except for in appearance. And that's not to say that one is inherently better, but to acknowledge that depending on what you specifically want, one kind of yarn might just suit your expectations more than the other Ultimately a lot of this comes down to preference. Some people can't stand the feeling of wool and thus prefer acrylic. I don't like how synthetic fibres feel against my skin so I opt for natural ones instead. Plastics are bad for the environment, but so is all fabric and fibre production, so unless you thrifted what you're using I don't wanna hear it (at least not if all you're offering is judgment and not solutions such as how to care for the finished product in the most sustainable way) Final note: allergies are a thing, as well as sensitivity to different chemicals. These also influence choices a crafter may make, or the requirements for charities and what donations they accept (I know children's hospitals tend to tell you to use very specific cottons, for example)
I always get the urge to tell people that test knitting is not the same thing as tech editing! Test knitters are knitting a pattern they want to knit for themselves anyway, except they volunteer to do it on a deadline and to point out mistakes they happen to come across. And to post on Insta/Ravelry, which they would likely do anyway. Neither indie designers nor craft publishers have the budget to pay test knitters for all sizes of a pattern and provide them with yarn-so if it weren't a volunteer thing, it wouldn't happen at all. Tech editing, on the other hand, is highly skilled, paid-for work, which goes to the comment about "not everyone who knits should publish patterns." Sure, publish patterns, but if you're charging money for them and want them clear and mistake-free, send them to a tech editor, not just test knitters!
Loooved your variegated yarn reel!!! Perfect response. I have to respectfully disagree on your take on inclusive sizing, it really bummed me out. I understand that designing patterns is a huge amount of work and inclusive sizing does add to that. However Im not going to buy a sweater pattern that I have do grading on because well, I shouldn't be expected to do extra work (more than I frankly already do) to make something work for me and a smaller person isn't expected to. Im happy to pay for a pattern, and pay more for inclusive sizing. If i follow that line of logic then no one should be expected or bother to include plus size people in the first place, if we should simply be doing for ourselves. Also, Ive tried to figure grading before. Im not a designer and.what i know about grading is that it is difficult and not something I would be confident doing anyway. Would practice change that? Yes, but that sort of frustration would take away from what I get from knitting, meditative joy. Not grading patterns to varied sizes is going to leave plenty of hopefuls outside looking in. Thanks for reading and I really do love your podcast.
I absolutely agree. No, it's not possible for a designer to account for every variation in a human body (torso length, chest size, arm length, sleeve preference, etc.) and yes it's great for knitters to feel empowered to make modifications to their garments. But, a knitwear designer who makes their patterns for a wide range of sizes and includes suggestions for modifications isn't just making my knitting experience nicer. It's telling me that they want to see their patterns on a body like mine. They're telling me that I'm welcome - in their patterns, in their community. A designer who only designs for a small range (of, typically, the smaller end of the size chart) isn't. If I'm going to buy a pattern, I know which one I want.
I have 2 opinions on this. The first is that while arm size and length and other body measurements vary from person to person no matter their size, a lot of patterns (both in knitting and sewing) don't do enough to try to add adjustments for those body measurements as they size up. It's not enough to simply add stitches to the sides of the front and back or the arm. My arm doesn't grow by as much as my hips do from one size to the next, nor does it grow longer simply because I'm bigger. I will often see a pattern that I like in the picture and then intensely dislike in my size because seemingly no thought is taken to how the differing proportions will affect the finished garment. For that reason, I don't bother thinking about whether the written sizes include mine, but rather whether I can find some photos of what people who are shaped more like me look like in those garments. I have yet to find a pattern that I do not need to adjust in any way, even if it's just accounting for tension. Therefore, my second thing is that I really wish that the patterns sold in North America included a proper diagram of the design with dimensions (in whatever the standard size is) and row and stitch count so that it would be easier to grade the pattern myself (since I need to do it anyway!). Without that, it's so much work to read the pattern, try to figure out how many rows there are in the waist decrease, how many rows are up to the arm hole, how many to the neck, how many stitches are decreased for the armhole overall, what is the neck width, etc. These things are so much more important than telling me to knit 2 st, decrease 1, knit 20 and then work the pattern for 2 more rows. I don't need the row by row instructions like that! I just want to know how much you decreased for the dimensions you had so that I can figure out the proportions of the design! Then I can adjust it for my size and yarn. The fact that I have had more luck with Japanese patterns (which I can't read, btw, but which have excellent diagrams) than with western ones says a lot!
acrylic is something I've decided never to buy again if I can help it, but it was also absolutely necessary to let me get started knitting. I'm poor. when I first started knitting, I couldn't afford to pay more than $3-4 at a time. so I would buy a new skein of acrylic every time I needed a color I didn't have (and as a queer pride merch maker, that happened pretty often). nowadays, I have a stash of acrylic yarn I'm still working through, so I'm trying to buy plant-based yarns instead (or wool if someone wants it for a commission). at this point, I'm capable of selling my knitting and my time costs much more than any difference in materials price, so I can afford that as long as I stick to only buying yarn when I need it for something. but I won't knock other poor people using acrylic to get to that point.
I can’t tell you how refreshing not only your perspective is here, but also how you shared it. Meaningful, relatable, respectful. No that you need me to tell you that, but thank you. ❤️
Ha! I related to the comment about buying a sweater. I've often spent way more knitting it myself than it would cost to buy it. I'm talking about cashmere, angora and other expensive yarns. And I know in advance it's going to fit me! One more thing is pattern updating. I bought a lovely pattern about a year ago and I've been holding off making it because I'm busy with other projects. Between the time I bought the pattern and today, it's been updated no less than 3 times. I have no idea what the changes were but I'm sure glad I didn't start making it as soon as it was published.
You never fail to make me laugh out loud, Tayler! Thank you! I have been asked numerous times if I would sell my crochet Amigurumi items and I mostly say no. I enjoy making them but I don’t want to have to make them. I made a 2 ft. tall Raggedy Ann doll a couple of months ago and really made someone mad that I wouldn’t sell it to her. I made it all in cotton which was about $35 + just in yarn and it took me hours. I told her that I didn’t think she would be willing to pay $500 for Raggedy Ann and Andy. That is probably the worst part about monetizing your craft, dealing with people. 🙄
Thank you so much for watching Catherine. ❤ And you’re absolutely right about monetizing your craft. It adds that extra element of pressure that can be very deflating.
I love these videos. I think it’s so healthy to be able to disagree and still be civil to and respect one another’s opinions. I agree that the lily sugar and cream cotton makes fabulous dishcloths!!
I 100% agree. There's no reason to be uncivil. We accomplish so much more if we all agree or disagree respectfully and without expectation. Thank you so much for watching! ❤️
That. These episodes are such a good example of how to be okay with disagreeing about something we are also passionate about. We need more of this attitude in the real world. :)
These videos are such fun! I just wanted to share what I do with some of the 87 gazzillion knit projects I've made but don't need - I have no problem donating a finished knit. Sometimes I just donate the yarn, but lately I've made items with the yarn and then donated the finished project. I tell myself that someone is out there looking for this particular item or they're thrifting and find a wonderful knitted gift for someone and how great they're going to feel when they find something handmade where they least expect it.
knitting is more time consuming and requires different types of tools, circular needles, straight needles, cord to hold your stiches so can be more expensive in those. While crochet requires more yarn so can be more expensive in the long run. but both are cool. stitch markers are annoying as the plastic ones break and I loose them too often to get more durable/ expensive ones.
agree on the more time consuming, but in terms of tools, a lot of things are actually not as necessary as they might seem initially. Most things can be made with circular needles with a long (100cm+) cable as far as I understand, I actually don't own any straight needles except for some dpns I picked up when I first started the hobby which have never seen use outside of my first project (which i actually finished on circulars for hand health reasons). As for holding stitches, you can also just use scrap yarn which you might even have left over as early as after your first project. stitch markers are also something that can be substituted for something already in your home like safety pins for example!
"be the chaos gremlin you wish to see in the world" is amazing. I think I may need to pick up cross stich again so I can have this visable from where I usually craft hehe
Right!? It was so good, I couldn't pass it up. In fact, I can't remember who shared it because the post disappeared from my stories before I could check, but I remembered it perfectly. 😊
Enjoyed this so much. You are articulate and seem to have a lot of common sense. I love how you can disagree with the comment without belittling the commenter. You make me smile. And you inspire me to keep creating for the joy of it.
As a crocheter of 20yrs and a knitter of 3yra, the cost is about the same. I think it took longer for the crochet community to catch on to what high quality products were, but you can make crochet as expensive as knitting and knitting as cheap as crochet. I can buy a set of $80 clover amore crochet hook a crazy expensive Tunisian or changeable set, I can also buy it bamboo knitting needles or Susan Bates metal straight. I'm also kind of over the" fact "hat there is knitting yarn and crocheting yarn. If it's a fiber you can art it.
I really love quite a lot of your points and we don’t all have to agree. That being said - I ver much disagree about knitters being expected to grade out to their own size. When I started knitting, it was hard to get sweaters past a 44” bust so I didn’t knit any for myself. It was like going to a store and not seeing your size, you watch everyone else be included while you’re stuck going to catalogs or online. As designers have started expanding to my size and beyond - not only did I not have to grade my own patterns, but I got to see people with bodies like mine knitting the sweater! I was finally represented!!!! Inclusive sizing is about so much more than doing the math but about including PEOPLE. Another plug is like to make for size inclusiveness, is asking more men to test knit, including more information about shoulder fit in non-yoke or non-raglan sweaters because typically men’s shoulders have a different proportion to their chest circumference than women’s.
I understand what you're saying here in regards to feeling represented and I've expounded on my feelings regarding this issue quite extensively in previous comment replies below. However I will just pose a couple of questions. What about folks who are of a bust size larger than yours and one that is not represented in a pattern? You have been included, yet they have not. Is it enough for those folks to acknowledge that the designer has "tried"? Or would it not be considered more "inclusive" for the designer to (acknowledging their limitations to meet the needs of everyone) offer the information/tutorial needed to adjust the pattern to fit the size of any individual not represented in the size range (essentially making the pattern accessible to anyone)? Not only is this a learning experience that will help build the skill set of the knitter (not unlike a pattern providing information and tutorials for executing a particular technique), it will empower the knitter and make accessible so many additional patterns and it emphasizes an understanding that PEOPLE are different sizes and shapes and making patterns accessible to them is important. I've discussed this in more detail in comments below and I invite you to check those out and include your thoughts there as well.
@@WOOLNEEDLESHANDS I would love to say I’m savvy enough to find the comments you mentioned but I haven’t yet 😂 what I would personally propose is that like some people in the sewing world do, designers offer to grade a pattern for someone who’s bust size hasn’t been included. If I’m going to do the math for a sweater, I’m not going to be paying premium pattern prices ($9-$15).
Just anecdotally, I tend to see crocheters using cheaper yarn more often than knitters do so the price for the average project might even out, but maybe that’s just among crochet influencers.
Crochet just uses significantly more yarn. So it’s way easier to use 7+skeins of cheap yarn for a blanket, rather than 7 skeins of expensive 20 bucks a pop yarn. I’m a crocheter who just started knitting this week. Crochet is quicker but more expensive due to yarn usage. But with just a single pack of hooks you can do anything. I did a rug recently for my hallway to use up some old partial yarns my abuela gave me. But knitting? Oof. I can’t even get a few rows in (I don’t know if they’re called rows in knit) without messing up.
I use Lily Sugar n Cream for my rags, especially for cleaning my chinchilla cage, and I cannot even fathom how much money I’ve saved from using it instead of paper towels. I STAN sugar n cream it is incredible for rags
Thank you for the hot takes! You know I was thinking. One of the best things I ever did on my sock journey (always have a pair on the go!) was take a class on knitting a sock that fit. Actually measuring in different spots, swatching at least initially to find your gauge for the fabric you like and would last longer in a sock. All these things. I promptly measured all the people in my life that I knit for and honed their specific sock recipes so I know what will fit the person I’m thinking of when I knit a pair. No generic one size fits all. You know what? They all, myself included, love the fit of their specific socks and it makes them want to wear them. When I eventually turn to garments I know I will have to adjust for my shape and I’ll figure it out then. I’d sooner have something comfortable and fitted to me then making myself fit into a standard, even an inclusive standard.
I absolutely LOVED this video. I have always appreciated your unapologetic approach to this craft you clearly enjoy. I thought your approach to the “opinions “ you touched on in this video encompassed this and a true inclusion to the views, methods, and opinions of individuals. Thank you.
I both knit and crochet but if I had to think about it, my investment in knitting was a higher upfront cost. I have wooden and metal versions of Straight, Circular and DPNs while I've gone through a few different sets of crochet hooks I do think I've spent a lot less there -but- thats a one time fee for most people and needling hoarding is never necessary once you settle on a set you like.
Re the pricey needles: knit picks or we crochet has really affordable interchangeable sets. I am so in love with mine i got the minis as well. And it's much cheaper to get a tip set and expand your cable choice than acrue fixed or straight needles in all the sizes and lengths you might need.
Re varigated are "matronly": I'm literally working on a neon goth sweater as I'm listening and it so so fun and youthful i can't wait to wear it. It alternates black rows and varigated pink/blue/purple rows that looks like bubblegum or cotton candy colors. I originally got the varigated for a popcorn stitch scarf but changed my mind and spent ages trying to figure out a new use for it.
Here's a hot take on some knitting advice/patterns when it comes to what shape garments look good on a person. I've seen reference to "....will minimize..." or " ...will make you look slimmer" so many times when referring to how to choose a garment shape. I find this just ICKY. Let's try "....will enhance....", "...will fit those with xyz more comfortably" instead. I have wide shoulders relative to other measurements, so basically I have to make shoulders that are at least 2 sizes larger to accommodate them, then adjust down to the suitable size for the rest. However, I could care less whether they are minimized by a certain style. What I do want is to not have my sweater creep up in my armpits and feel like a straight jacket. Maybe I would feel differently if I was dealing with a different body part being considerably larger than the rest, but still, why would I necessarily want to minimize any of it? I don't get it. Enhance, comfort, works best with xyz yarn, etc are much more body positive ways to approach style. Just my opinion :-)
I love those videos! They're so fun 😁 One thing I don't like about size inclusivity is when people in podcasts apologize for showing a FO that is not size inclusive. Unless you're gonna hide it forever in a drawer, people are gonna see it anyway. Maybe those people anticipate the negative comments of others (which should not happen IMO) but PLEASE PEOPLE knit any design you want, whether it's size inclusive or not. I understand if people don't wanna encourage designers who don't publish size inclusive patterns and I respect that decision but let's say you already had the pattern or someone gifts it to you or whatever. Knit it if you like it. You can tell people that it's not inclusive but please don't apologize. There are enough things to feel bad about in life, I don't think this should be one of them.
Speaking as someone who benefits from larger sizes: Bigger sizes are not always equal. I’ve bought patterns from big name designers who expanded their ranges but the grading is/was crap. I’d rather buy a well fitted pattern which is slightly smaller, knowing that I’d need to alter. Not a popular opinion😊
A hot response--what do people do to their socks that they are destroyed after three wearings?! I've got some socks that are going on 10 years old and have never had to be darned. Granted, I only wear my wooly socks in the winter and I'm not, say, hiking 10 miles through rugged terrain while wearing them, but still! 🤷♀ Speaking of decades... As you noted, Lily Sugar and Cream is da bomb for dishcloths and similar items. I've also got some that are going on 10 years old. The colors have faded, of course, but they're still structurally sound and clean great. I wouldn't knit a sweater out of it, but it's definitely not garbage yarn.
Lily sugar and cream is a great yarn for hot pads and dish rags. I hold 3 strands and knit a square for the hot pads and give them as gifts. They’re very popular with my friends.
The size inclusion poster does make an important point. I do bespoke sweaters for my (adult) children because I like being able to make them the exact sweater they were after (including a short sleeve sweater for my perpetually cold younger daughter to wear in the summer). My daughters are vastly different in size though - older daughter is a 3XL and younger daughter is a 3 XS. I normally do top down sweaters and the set up and division for sleeves require entirely different ratios for each size. You cannot just adjust stitch counts and keep going for bigger or smaller sweaters. To make them fit correctly, you really need to understand the structure of the sweater and how it will fit on the body wearing it.
This is a very good point and one that illustrates the need for tailoring (pattern adjustment) in the knitting skill set. A designer can only go so far for a pattern that will be knit by folks of myriad sizes and shapes.
Exactly! it is impossible to make a pattern for everybody type in the world! The knitter needs the tool/skill to make adjustments! Just like if you buy jeans, know how to hem!
Thank you for seeing the value in acrylic yarn. Do to my financial situation acrylic is basically all I use because it is all I can afford, and my craft skills and acrylic yarn are how I manage to give Christmas to 14 people that I love every year. Often, especially when searching for patterns, I feel a bit shamed or snubbed because I simply cannot afford the beautiful hand dyed yarn I dream of one day having. All that should matter is that the maker is finding joy and peace in the act of knitting/crocheting, and the people who are receiving the items love and use them. I just love your channel and your vibe. Thanks for being here.
It’s my pleasure to speak to the value of acrylic yarn Kate and I’m glad that this may also provide that little boost of confidence when you choose yarn for your projects. You should never feel shamed or snubbed and what you’re doing for those you live during the holidays is wonderful. Thank you for watching Kate. ❤️
My go to is always socks. Its so portable and the basic pattern is lodged firmly in my brain. I do, however, have socks that are more than 5 years old. And i wear only my hand knits. Granted...i am 74 and no longer go dancing, ect...lol
I was weaving loose threads while watching this with headphones on and laughing loudly. My husband at the other side of the room thought I was watching a comedy. Surprise a knitting podcast! Love the knitting community and like your take on things. I have learned quite a bit on your podcast and appreciate hearing opinions on different topics. I agree what works for one person may not work for someone else….I aim to listen with an open mind and heart…. Always! Have a great day and happy crafting!
I love this Samantha. Thank you for watching. I’m so glad you enjoyed it and you’re absolutely right. What works for one may not work for another. And by golly, that’s ok. ❤️❤️❤️ Have a great day!
Every pattern doesn’t look great on every body shape. It’s not just about sizing. It’s about shape and what is being accented. There are patterns I will never buy that are gorgeous but will never look great on me. And that’s ok.
Fantastic episode Tayler! As usual, you've got us exploring, diving deep into our emotions. One note about acrylic yarn: as someone who knits and crochets for charity, the suggested supplies are always acrylic to try and avoid reactions/allergies for those who are ill as well as ease in laundering. It's a choice between giving comfort and worrying about micro plastics in the water, but for me, comforting another human being right now, this second, wins every time. Thanks as always Tayler--you are the best. Hugs from Canada.
I think this insight is very valuable and I agree with you 100%. Charity and caring for those in need in that moment is priority number one and you’re a very kind soul for acknowledging that. Thank you so much for watching and for your kind words. It means a great deal to me Lori. ❤️
I've got a hot take for ya! I'll get butchered for it, but the beanie/toque hats with the "reservoir tip" at the top make people look liken they are wearing fuzzy condoms on their heads. They look ridiculous. on everyone. LOL
Crocheting could devour an entire yarn store and still go back for seconds. There is ZERO chance that knitting is more expensive long-term. This is also why yarn snobbery sends me into a blind rage. So many times it's coming from knitters 😂
Everything i knit whether for customers, for family, friends or myself i enclose a small ball of the yarn and button in case of loss and a yarn label with washing instructions enclosed. I make sure to cover both during the exchange. No, i dont feel badly about oassing on infi. Once done and passed over ut us no longer ny concern. I can dance right on ti the next project! Right now im making protheses socks for a double amputee. So interesting. There are no patterns for these or even guidelines. So far i have frogged three times. Ideas?
nice video, I wanted to point out 2 things I feel are also important. I am someone who doesn't like knitting synthetic fiber but I feel Synthetic fibers are just as valid. Not all acrylic and synthetic yarn is flammable it depends on what chemical treatments have been used. The second and more important point is its not just about body shape and size when considering what a person thinks looks good on them. I am a larger bodied person who loves showing skin and fell confident in my hoochie daddy shorts and sheer tanks. What's most important about size inclusive clothing is does it make the wearer fell comfortable and confident in it. As always I highly enjoyed your vireo keep up the great work and have a great day.
I love Granny square blankets. However, having made a few, I would rather buy them at my thrift store already made for 10 dollars, versus 50 to 100 in yarn if not using scraps. I am just finishing a Granny square blanket that I have been working on for nearly 12 years. That's because I have put it aside for more interesting projects for years at a time. I am planning a move and would rather not move UFOs.
I only gift to people that I care for and those people know the work and love I put into the gift. No need to emphasize it. They also know that I am giving them something to love on and not to sit in the closet. Love it ‘til it’s bare and then you get a new one. I do make sure I use the appropriate yarn for my recipient. A new mom doesn’t need more work so I don’t give them hand wash only items. I usually do superwash and just tell them, wash as usual but pull it out to dry. If that’s to tough, I get acrylic blends. Because acrylic is okay to use. Great video. Thanks for the 30 minute break. 😊
Love the end monologue, Taylor, very powerful and well articulated. There is a whole new layer of joy in designing and creating designs of your own, and this joy can only be accessed through a skillset as you described: shaping, grading, understanding the anatomy of knitwear, improvising. I learnt this initially because I wanted my knits to fit meticulously, and now I just won't have it any other way. Handmaking has its true power in personalized *fit*, every inch of your hard work is seen and felt. It is absolutely worth it.
I was surprised when I started knitting that patterns called for just as much yarn as needed for crochet. As for the tools and accessories, I love collecting them! I find knitting more expensive than crochet because I'm interested in better quality yarns. For 10 years I was happy to churn out bright, acrylic crochet blankets and cardigans. Now that I'm a knitter I prefer natural fibres and I'm trying to find yarns that don't make me itch!
As for 'sharing' patterns, I agree with Taylor - I treat patterns like I do recipes or books. I paid for it, so I feel comfortable sharing it with friends. But a teaching situation is different. I am attending the KAL knitting retreat this weekend and am happy to say that the 'workshop' project last spring was designed by the person giving the course and she included the pattern. In this session the pattern is by another designer and the attendees had to purchase it.
Acrylic yarn is great for crochet. Crochet uses so much yarn. Crochet is also way easier even though I’m a lefty and before being able to get online, I learned from my right handed abuela when I was a kid. But left handed didn’t translate well to knitting (I just started this week trying and failing miserably I can’t get past a few rows [are they rows in knit??] before messing up and having to restart) so I taught myself right handed knit. Knit is hard. I’m determined to learn and I don’t understand patterns but I want to make Harry Potter house sweaters for my family Edit: luckily I have plenty of cheap yarn to practice on!
I really enjoyed your commentary! I would say the biggest issue with sharing patterns is when the digital pattern is shared as well. It’s just the same as sharing a music file and the reason Napster and KaZaA got shut down. 😊 I believe in valuing and respecting the designers and I feel like they deserve to be compensated for their work.
I am mainly a crochet mama, but your channel is a while vibe. And to be honest I generally stay away from a lot of knitting channels unless they're doing yarn reviews. I watch your stuff. Excellent job. Happy New Year 🎉🎉🎉
You’ve said it so well. I’m adding that you should always use yarn with nylon for socks. I wear out the toe tops quickly so I use double yarn for the toe portion. If you wear out the heels, try a different heel like eye of partridge. Love my socks!
This is such great advice Kim and I actually just picked up a spool of Nylon to use with some all-wool yarn I want to use for socks. Would you recommend using it for just those heavy-wear sections or for the whole sock?
There is music behind this video that was added intentionally. I like it and find that it adds some casual spunk and good vibes. If it’s not for you, that’s ok. Either push through, or catch the next one. Thank you for your interest either way. 👍
In today's Ramble, I'm providing commentary on some of your spiciest knitting/fiber arts-related opinions, also known as "hot takes". Buckle up and open your mind and get ready for some opinionated banter.
Please know: we are all entitled to our opinion. If you do not agree or share my opinions, that is ok. You are welcome here regardless and are also welcome to provide your own opinion in the comments of this video. However, be nice. ❤
I’m going to chip in here with a hot take on background music. I’ll start by saying that I’ve noticed a preponderance of neuro diverse people in the knitting community. Hyperfocus on one craft, desire to talk about it ad infinitum and to knit for many hours in the day are common tropes amongst knitting podcasters and their audiences. I’ve also seen physical behaviours consistent with stimming amongst the many podcasters on this topic that I watch. This is not to say that all knitting podcasters are neurodiverse, of course. Only that some appear to be and some podcasters profess to being ADHD or neuro diverse, commenting on the positive ways knitting plays off or plays into their dispositions towards the world, from being able to make clothes exactly as you want them, without seams and in fabrics you tolerate well, to the repetitive and soothing way that the knit stitch acts on the soul.
At the same time, hypersensitivity to sound is documented as a common challenge for neurodiverse people. It is thought that the ‘sensory traffic controller’ in the brains of children and adults with auditory sensitivity pays much more attention to sounds than expected. Instead of ignoring sounds that aren’t important, it keeps attending to them. This means children and adults with sound sensitivity are more easily distracted to noises in the environment. It can also decrease their ability to focus on the relevant noise (e.g. their teacher talking).
When this happens, the amygdala can become more quickly overwhelmed by sounds. This could be because it finds it more difficult to process all of the noises at once. It could also be because paying attention to all of the audio information in the space, it is processing a lot more information at the same time.
It feels like one of those traffic jams where all of the cars are beeping their horns. The brain cannot process all of the information and will trigger a fight, flight or freeze response. So, the child or adult might hit out, run away, shut down. It is important to remember that their response is rooted in an automatic nervous system response rather than ‘bad behaviour’ or just being snarky or difficult.
None of this is to say that background music should not be used and I think your point, Tayler that you will sometimes use it because you like it and that we can choose to grin and bear it or skip the video is a valid take. Also, music will not affect every ADHD person in the same way and many will not find it a problem. I just wanted to raise this point so that people read those comments with some compassion rather than thinking of them as just grumpy or overly critical. If people who this effects keep listening despite their discomfort, it’s because they really love you. If they comment it may be because they are scared it will become your norm and they’ll lose the joy of listening to you.
@@verylikecherylI Know There Are A Lot Of People In America Who Are Pretending To Be Neurodivergent... Because Being "Different" Is Now The Hip Thing. I See It All Around Me In My Generation. If Most Of These People Were Really Neuro's Or On Any Spectrum, We'd Be Constantly Surrounded By Mini Meltdowns, Everything Would Have To Come To A Standstill Each Time A Tic Began, Or Stimming Happened... Because As You Say It's A Subconscious Action, Not A Chosen Behavior Right? My Coworker Is Heavily Medicated, And Still Retains Her Facial Tics In Moments Of Stress She Lashes Out. She Is Authentic, And We Do Not Stop The Entire Restaurant Every Time She Has An Episode... Life Goes On, And Asking Everyone To Stop Or Change Themselves For A Small Segment Of The Population Which Is Truly Different Is Like Saying Because There Are 100 Lepers, We Must All Sequester Ourselves In Different Colonies, Or Stay Inside. That's Just My Opinion Though.
All good! Especially size inclusion discussion, Teach a knitter to alter, size up or down, do the math, than you. an knit ANY PATTERN. Not everything will be done for you!
I totally agree! It never dawned on me that I could do that for myself! Duh!!
Agree a million times!
As the child of a crafter, the hoarding of yarn, fabric, patterns etc was a barrier to enjoying time with my mother. Having to go buy new things for the new project when the house was stuffed with loads of unused supplies and half done patterns and walking around craft stores for hours instead of spending actual quality time with my mom has stuck with me as an adult when I do crafts. Don't let the craft/hobby/collection own you, it's fun to explore your hobbies and the new project is always the most exciting but if you share your space with other people remember that they may not love the craft as much as they love you. Make space for both.
I think this is a really interesting and important perspective. You’re absolutely right. And I guess it goes to what the individual said regarding having the space. “Having space” is subjective. It can mean one thing to one person and something very different to the person with whom that space is shared. Thank you for sharing your experience. ❤️
This almost reads as "as the child of a mother who crafted with undiagnosed ADHD or autism" as mass starting and never finishing projects is a common problem.
@@FoxInTheStudio Knowing my mom, it's not that, and either way my point stands that your behavior as a crafter effects the people you live with so the idea that there is no such thing as too much yarn maybe be true for the crafter but not for their family who has to live with the hoarding.
My children and grandies often come to shop at my free store for beads and yarn. I am clear at the start what is up for grabs and what already has a customer. Fortunately/unfortunately, there is always lots to choose from. Lol
@@FoxInTheStudioI think this is me. I haven’t been aware of the effect it could have on my daughter in the future and now plan to think deeply about my relationship with knitting and yarn and my kid. I am 99% sure I have undiagnosed ASD but getting a diagnosis is so difficult so I haven’t explored that yet. I have a large collection of started but unfinished projects (along with many more definite symptoms of neurodivergence).
I think the thing to remember, re: snobbery/"cheap yarn is trash"/etc., is that inexpensive yarn makes the craft accessible for people who don't have the funds for pricier yarn. And there are plenty of those people. So while it's perfectly valid to have an opinion about the type of yarn you prefer to use, let's not gatekeep the craft in such a way that excludes people who don't have the same level of discretionary spending.
Melissa I agree with you. I understood Taylor’s point that people are allowed to like nice things & they shouldn’t be called snobs for that. However, there are people who are snobby & make comments in yarn shops when people are selecting less expensive yarns & tools. People have different budgets and that should be respected.
At the moment, I am knitting an acrylic blanket, a cotton sweater, a varigated shrug with yarn by an indie dyer, and socks.....so I think I hit a lot of those spicy notes. But I gotta do what makes me happy!
Yes you do! Happy making!❤
Amen!
While wearing your short sleeve sweater🤣
Thanks for standing up for the colourwork yokes👌 As a Scandinavian it’s always uncomfortable to see people talk about our traditions as if it’s merely a trend made for modern social media
Monetizing my items is a very sore spot for me. I knit hats for charity. You wouldn't believe how many people want me to sell them so I can have more money to buy more yarn for my charity. I know without a doubt that if I sold the hats ... yes I'd have more money...but I would lose my desire to continue my charity knitting. When I need more yarn, I always get donations that is needed. Sometimes it's scarchy RHSS. Sometimes it's old, very old yarn. But always well received by me for the generosity. Yarn stash saves the day by doubling up the thinner yarns to make up either DK or Worsted weight. The veterans and homeless appreciate anything that comes their way. That's my focus. Great podcast today. Thanks.
"Do no harm but take no sh*t" is my new slogan. Yet another super-fun episode, Tayler!!!
I want that on a t-shirt
"Do no harm but take no shit." (Tayler Earl)
Well said, Tayler... well said ❣
Thank you! Alas, it is not my line. It's a great one though.
lindagraham-mft.net/do-no-harm-take-no-shit/
There is absolutely a point to short sleeve or even sleeveless sweaters. Your core is the most important part of your body to keep warm because it contains all of the vital organs. If your core starts to get cold, your brain will prioritize your core over your extremities and send more warm blood there, and you may end up with frost bite. However, if you keep your core nice and toasty, your brain won’t need to prioritize it.
I have 4 sideways related hot takes: 1) the reason that people need to keep making new socks is because we are using wool from the worst sheep breed to make yarn. Such a big percentage of yarns offered as sock yarns are made of super wash Merino/nylon. Merino is super soft, but it is not durable at all. The worst choice for socks. There are wools from other sheep breeds that would last way longer.
2) socks do not need nylon/plastic in them at all. Nor do they need to be superwash. Just choose yarn from an appropriate breed.
3) not all people who choose not to use nylons, or prefer if other people would rely less on plastic yarns do it because they are snobs, or even have a lot of money. Some of us think our over reliance on plastic is not a good choice for the environment, and are willing to make choices. Environmentally friendly options don't have to be super expensive, but I might not make something in Aran or bulky yarn, as it would make my project to expensive. I learned to spin (on a spindle) and if I want an aran weight yarn, I spin for it. Buying fleece can be much cheaper than yarn, and the time spent spinning definitely slows down my knitting speed, and therefore my spending. 4) The environmental consequences of our hobby are not discussed enough.
What are better breeds of sheep for socks? It feels like the wool yarn market is practically dominated by Merino and alpaca
I agree that there are better breeds than Merino for socks. Literally anything other than Merino is better for socks. I could do a whole video on sheep breeds ideal for sock yarn.
As for not requiring Nylon, of course you don’t need it. However if it means the socks will last longer, some may find that economical, the views some have on Nylon’s environmental impact notwithstanding.
As for the snobbery discussion, and like I emphasize in the video: it doesn’t matter what you prefer and why. It’s the tendency some have for making others feel less-than for using something different that may or may not constitute snobbery.
In regards to the environmental impact of this craft not being discussed enough, what issues concern you most that you find to be under-acknowledged?
@@WaraiShiro Well, if you have a chance to try any of the Dorset breeds, their yarn is strong, stretchy, and very resistant to felting. Not easy to get, mainly because we as knitters are not asking for it, and the farmers don't know how good their wool is for socks. Many of them are literally throwing away their wool, because it is more expensive to bring it to the wool board, then what they get paid for it. Any of the " Down" breeds is good for socks, Romney is great and pretty soft, but still very durable. I have knitted quite a few socks without acrylic, and many of them last a lot longer than my yarns WITH acrylic. BFL is often mentioned, but that yarn is quite silky and not very stretchy, so it loses it's shape quicker, and it does felt.
@@WOOLNEEDLESHANDS well, mixing acrylic into your yarn makes the yarn no longer bio degradable, when one of the big pluses of wool is that it is fully compostable. Our addiction to merino, which doesn't often get any push back, means that many of us are not using yarns or wool from closer to home, even if that yarn would be a better choice for the project at hand. I personally find it quite shocking that we have 65 native breeds in the UK where I live, but when I go to a yarn show in the UK, at least 90 percent is Merino, with or without plastic, which is a breed that does not grow well in the UK. So we are shipping wool from Australia, New Zealand or the Peruvian highlands, whilst the farmers in our own area throw away perfectly good wool, because there is no demand. That's just one example... Hey, you asked for salty opinions! :-) I am happy to see that there are more people who start to ask questions, for instance if their wool is mulesing free, but who is asking about the mileage your yarn made to get to you? Or how eco friendly the dyes used in their beautiful skeins are? By putting people who are questioning the status quo in the corner of being elite or snobbish, we muffle a conversation I think should be had. Can we not point out to our fellow crafters, that our choices have environmental impact?
Hey please give me tips on what sock yarn to look for and why? I would 100% prefer wool only sock yarns rather than the mixed but don't feel confident enough in being able to choose the right yarn for it. Thank you!
I have one opinion that im careful sharing, cause most other knitters i know disagree. But here it comes: i feel the patterns for sweaters and hats havent changed at all the last 30 years, and the needlecraft community could need some new inspiration. At least in norway. 🤫
I both knit and crochet. Knitting tools are DEFINITELY more expensive! I can go to any craft store and pick up a decent hook for a few bucks. I’ve invested in 4 different interchangeable needle sets and still need to purchase more stuff all the time.
Hot take: just because I know how to knit and crochet does NOT mean I am obligated to teach you for free, or at all, if I would rather spend my spare time on my own projects.
100% agree! I don’t have the patience anymore (have done it in the past) nor will I knit or sew (mend, hem etc.) something on demand. I tell people UA-cam has loads of tutorials or if you’re lucky enough to have local teachers pay for lessons (or if not there’s online courses one can pay for too).
A tip a yarn dyer told me its easy to replace contrasting heels and toes when they get holes. Either keep some remaining yarn to re-knit the heel/toe or pick a new color to make your socks mismatched in a funky way.
I've never heard someone called a snob for using nice materials. I've only heard that when they're saying "You MUST use expensive yarn" or "REAL crafters use wool" or "Acrylic is for amateurs" or something else that heavily implies you're basic and less-than for not choosing expensive materials and tools. Bringing it up this way makes it seem like anytime someone uses nice yarn they get attacked, but that is just not the behavior I've been seeing in my feeds. Maybe that's anecdotal, but changing the context the way you did makes it seem like the "problem" is the people who call out snobs for their behavior rather than the snobbish behavior that's... frankly kinda all over the place in yarn crafting social media.
What I DO see is people insisting you MUST use only the finest stuff... and you can get it in the link in their bio. Everyone has a motive, but some motives are much more sinister than others. If you really think people who use acrylic or plastic hooks or needles are beneath you, then go with god and spend your money as you see fit and don't let my plastic-y door hit you on the way out. However if you're just doing that to sell more stuff... that's just gross, because you're not just a snob, you're an unprincipled snob.
Like I mention in this video regarding my concept of snobbery, using nice things does not make a person a snob. Using nice things while also making others feel less than for choosing not to use those same things is snobbery. Which is the sentiment you’re expressing here as well. I think folks who share their interest and tendency to choose nice things and expensive notions, etc. tend to get lumped into that category of “snob”. In fact, some wear that “badge” proudly. However I think that assuming a person is a snob simply because they use and promote nice things (“like nice things” as I put it here) is unnecessary and rude.
This is a real hot button topic for a lot of folks. I’ve personally been labeled a snob for sharing pricey things that I personally use and like, yet anyone who knows me either in person or from my channel knows how inaccurate that is because I’m not a complete jerk about it and would never belittle someone for having different budget restrictions.
If you’ve not seen evidence of this, then that’s great. Unfortunately that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. In fact when I reached out to folks asking for their hot takes, it was a majority of the ones I received. It’s a common gripe in many artistic/niche communities. It’s nothing new. 👍
In regards to content creators using affiliate marketing to promote products that they use and like (and which come at no additional cost to their audience), that’s a means of making an income for something they are otherwise doing for free. I don’t consider that gross or sinister by any means. Just my hot take.
Hot takes: knitting books today are looking much thicker but are made with half of the book filled with back story and aestetic instagram, and the patterns are stretched out over so many pages. Like - I want patterns from knitting books. Not the designer's full personal back story... That I can get from youtube.
Also, on the physical copy sharing hot take - it is very seldom when you share a book with someone that you make a printed photocopy of the whole thing, meaning you physically cannot read the book when it is lended out. This is what makes it legal or not.
oh yeah no 100%. im only 18, but the knitting book my grandma bought me when i was 6/7 has more content in it than most knitting books i find in craft stores lmao
Yes srsly I go and buy vintage patterns from my favourite second hand for like 10cents each, printed on single or a double sheet of paper, simple, concrete, no fuzz. I also got a booklet with like 100 crochet patterns/structures which fit in a small magazine. I don't want 1kg books with no content :P@@bellac6311
Personally I’m a crocheter but I agree 100% I’ve gotten so much from a single book I got from my grandma when I started, I’d recommend checking out preused/thrifted books, especially if you’re looking for simple basic stitches
Thank you for doing this video! It was done with so much respect and care. In today’s culture opinions are thrown like confetti (mostly confetti consisting of nails 😂) It would be nice if everyone learned to “scroll on” instead of adding their two cents. Your videos are always a joy to watch.
Thank you so much Shannyn (this is such a cool spelling). I agree with you and I’m so glad this video came across positive and without judgement. That means a lot. ❤️
Listening to this on my drive home - I love to hear these hot takes! I've gotta jump in about Sugar & Cream, though. I have made at least two sweaters with it that have lasted - get ready for it - more than 30 years. I was in my teens/20s in the 1980s and folks, yarn selection was NOT what it is today! First off, not as many people knitted, and secondly, you pretty much had cotton yarn and acrylic yarn, and a little bit of wool from very-few-and-far-between local yarn shops or by mail order. Some of us were also on a budget, and yarns like Sugar & Cream were what we could afford. So I'm gently pushing back here -- you can totally make garments with Sugar & Cream that will wear for years and years. AND - bonus - garments made with S&C do NOT grow and droop like some cotton knits do.
Honestly thank you for this, one thing people are not remembering is that you have to shop in a budget, I'm 18 I can't afford high-end cotton yarn so i have to work with what I can afford and the take feels kinda classist
Absolutely loved this episode! In particular, I loved your responses to "acrylic is trash" and your thoughts on how the label "snob" or "snobbery." 💯🔥
As someone who crochets as my primary craft I can confirm that you will spend more on yarn, on average, for a project than you would knitting that same project instead. Crochet really, really eats yarn. However, I will say that I was pretty shocked at how much more expensive knitting needle sets are vs crochet hook sets when I decided I wanted to try knitting.
I'm all for opinions... it's just when someone insists that what is right for them must be right for you ... that's when i get offended.
Loved this video and all of the comments.
My hot take: sometimes I just use the end of the yarn on the outside of the scein rather than digging in the middle for the inside end.
I do both. Crochet GOBBLES yarn. I can’t afford top shelf yarn for every crochet project. I knit almost exclusively with “expensive” yarn. I recently bought a knit sweater’s worth of indie dyed yarn for less than a crochet afghan’s worth of big box acrylic yarn. As far as tools, like in any trade, I could accomplish a lot with just a few cheap tools, or I could spend a fortune on every single top-of-the-line tool that exists, and I’ve leaned both ways over the course of my yarning career. My personal crochet hooks have cost me less than my knitting needles, but I crochet very little compared to how much knitting I do. Whatever my yarn budget is, I will spend it all either way, so idk why this argument even matters!
It’s absolutely not typical for hand knit socks to get holes after only wearing three times. Use sturdy sock yarn such as Payton’s Kroy , avoid Merino, cashmere, and other soft fibers, and knit at 8 stitches per inch and you’ll have socks that will hold up for years. Then learn to darn when the inevitable holes appear to extend the life of your socks for a few more years.
Great advice. Thank you Susan!
My first pair of socks have been darned so many times.. they are felted on the sole😅 After 10 years.. they are still my favorites ❤
I thought this was odd too. I use wys, opal, felici and the like and wear a pair every work day. They last fine. Although i do know some people (for whatever reason) wear socks hard and even store bought dont last very long for them. 🤷🏻♀️
I started as a crocheter. Knitting is definitely more expensive.
Personal hot take is you don’t have to knit/crochet any and every project out there to be crafter. Not everyone likes the same things and that’s okay
Yes!! I agree. ❤
On the subject of the cost of tools - yeah, I have spent less and own fewer crochet hooks. I can pull the hook out of a project if I need it for another purpose. That is harder to do with knitting needles. But I knit more than I crochet, so having a few dozen needles in my house matters to me. Straights, DPNs, circs, interchangables in lots of sizes..... But as Taylor said - knitting uses less yarn, so there is that aspect.
My favorite crocheted item ever is an acrylic blanket that my grandmother made. And i dont just love it because she made it. Its beautiful, in my favorite colors, and its held up to 30 plus years of constant use. So acrylic isnt trash unless you make it into trash. Do i use it for socks? No. Do i love it for sweaters? ❤ sometimes. No one should be shamed for choosing acrylic yarn when they want to. Half the clothing on the rack is acylic or acrylic blend. Whats the difference?
I choose natural fibers because I don't like the clothing on the rack - synthetic fibers make me sweaty. I try to choose things that are better for the planet and that feel better or wear nicer. As far as I can tell, there is a spectrum of quality and price for synthetic fibers, and I've seen 100% synthetic yarns that cost more than 100% natural yarns. I don't think it's being snobbish to ask people to think about their yarn choices, anymore than it's snobbish to suggest someone recycle a can or bottle once in a while instead of always throwing it in the trash.
I try to give people the benefits of the yarn I chose rather than tell them how fancy it is. “I chose such and such blend so it’ll be super comfortable for you and be relatively easy to care for” over “ I used this specialty yarn from a specialty shop”. I get to talk up the yarn without putting them off 😂
Just another opinion on lending out patterns....If I have purchased a pattern from an independent designer, I will NOT lend it out. I paid for the pattern and being a designer is not exactly a road to riches! I will of course happily direct requests to Ravelry or wherever I purchased the pattern. I recently had a very casual aquaintence ask to borrow a sewing pattern I purchased online, spent probably an hour printing out and taping together, etc., etc., I want to support independent hard working designers and this is the best way I know of to do that.
The monetizing comment is so true. It just sucks that most people who dont make things compliment your makes by saying, "wow, you should sell those!" Like its the ultimate compliment to say your item would be worth money to someone else. I know they mean it well, but i dont want my pieces to look like they came from a mindless machine. Thats not a compliment to me and it just makes for an awkward conversation if they press the issue and i have to explain that i dont want to suck the joy out of my hobby by making a million of the same thing for no money because im competing with a machine in Asia somewhere.
Very thought provoking.
Also….thanks for quoting my life motto “do no harm but take no shit”😊
It’s my motto too!! Love it!!❤
Not all sweaters look good on all bodies, 100% true. I have narrow, sloping shoulders and a big bust, and yoke sweaters of any kind makes me look horrible. It de-emphasizes my already narrow shoulders and somehow manages to hide my bust as well.
I really wish I could make a nice colorwork Scandinavian sweater, but I am not going to put all that work into it to have it sit in a drawer.
I'm a crocheter. I keep a list of things people have said they would like, and I work on projects as I get the inspiration. But I also take into consideration how a person might appreciate a handmade gift. I don't want to spend hours, days, sometimes months, working on a piece only for it to be never used, or worse, abused and destroyed. And I also refuse to take commissions or payments. For me, it takes the joy out of making.
I love this Ramble! My personal spicy knitting opinions are 1. I hate magic loop. 2. I hardly ever swatch and 3. I hardly ever block. But I also don't knit a lot of sweaters. I am a yarn snob and want to use the nicest yarn so for me to buy 8 or 9 or 10 skeins of such and such yarn to knit a specific sweater, it's cost prohibitive. Oh and using a knitting machine isn't real knitting... I said it...
It seems like a lot of these opinions arise out of people paying too much attention to what others are doing instead of just doing their own thing and being happy with that. :) No, knitting doesn't have to be spectacular, though it certainly can be. But some of us are also process knitters, we do it for relaxation. I work at home, I'm old, I'm not trying to impress anyone, and I'm just not that worried about having spectacular garments to wear. A few, yes, for special occasions, but I mostly wear tee shirts. I do knit, and I love what I knit, and I also knit for my cats, who are the most appreciative little guys ever. It doesn't matter what I knit, a plain utility bag, a blanket, or something that is just like a large swatch. As soon as they see it, they want to lie on it, and then give me this look (because they know I made it), as if to say, "You are a goddess!" Appreciation doesn't get more pure than that.
Take pleasure in knitting, but don't let it be to please other people you don't even know. Please, please, people, do it for the joy of it, in whatever way you think best for you and those you love!
It was such an inspiring video! Thank you for your benevolence and humor.
I would like to add something about sizes and shapes (sorry about my english, I'm a french speaker). A French designer that I know has made patterns with a lot of adjustment possibilities and very complete guides to work them. It was a lot of work, so she had to upgrade her prices. It was also not as easy as the average patrern for the knitters. It required measurments (not only for the chest) and some math. People complained about it so she had to stop and go back to something simpler.
It’s difficult for a designer to find the balance between what people want and the effort they are willing to make to have it.
This is very interesting and I’m so glad you included it here. And what you say here at the very bottom is just it. It’s a difficult balance to be sure. Thank you so much for watching Sara!
Oh, opinions.... I used to have a quote about them on my office door: "You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant." (Harlan Ellison) Sorry, but far too many of my students were comfortable voicing their opinions and had not the slightest clue what they were talking about. Yes, we're all entitled to believe and think what we want. The trouble comes when people voice those thoughts.
Controversial opinions are (IMO 🙂) fodder for very interesting conversations.
I honestly couldn't agree more. Thank you Noelle. ❤️
Hiya librarian who works with copyright to an extent here, wanted to ad a little bit on the sharing of patterns and book comparison. The issue is publishing. Same as with books, you cannot copy and share parts of copyrighted content without the authors permission or a license to do so (copyright does vary based on the country). I would see no harm in sharing a print pattern with someone for their own use (similarly to what you would have done with a print book), but if you were to send pdfs to people/multiple people I would see that as breach of copyright. Also in terms of support of designers, I am pretty sure knitwear design isn't an extremely profitable business, so personally I'd prefer to support the designers by paying for their patterns. Plenty of wonderful free patterns on rarely as well, for anyone who might not have the budget.
Listening to you talking about socks today made me realize I've been subjecting myself to the sunk cost fallacy. I spent so much time learning how to knit socks, trying every different type of heel and toe, that I felt obligated to keep knitting socks. I'm sitting here watching this, with a sock in my hand, and I'm not happy knitting this sock. I'm tired of knitting socks, and knowing that they're just going to get holes in them and fall apart is pretty much the final straw. I'm just going to go back to working on my sweater and be happy.
I'd like to share my perspective on the idea that everyone should learn how to grade patterns so they can always make the perfect size/shape of garment for their body. I think it would be ideal and very cool if everyone could learn that skill, but I don't think it's fully realistic. I am a plus size knitter, so this skill would be useful for me. But I also have a chronic illness that limits my energetic output and impacts my ability to learn, and learning to grade patterns sounds cognitively difficult and like it would take significant time/energy. So for me (and I imagine for others too, like people who don't like math), learning to grade patterns is not on the table.
I would also add that the pattern being graded is part of the service I am paying for when I buy a pattern.
Lastly, I think it's very important for knitting patterns to come in a size inclusive range to make it clear that we as a knitting community embrace knitters of all sizes.
Yes!!!! 100% this!!!!
I appreciate your perspective. And I would begin by saying that I think it would be great (ideal, even) if every person's size and shape were included in a knitting pattern (in a way that did not detract from the readability of the pattern--which is a formatting concern some folks have). However, like I mention here (in this video) that may not be feasible or realistic. We need to examine what is the most reasonable/realistic/feasible "solution" to address this issue, and in regards to what you say here about the difficulty some may have with learning this process and all that I mention in the video, we are at an impasse. Both of our options seem unrealistic to an extent.
However I acknowledge that you are not suggesting that a designer include EVERY possible size and I understand that you feel that the inclusion of a wide range of sizes in general is enough for a design or designer to be considered inclusive and embracing knitters of all sizes. And I am not suggesting that folks do math that is any more difficult than that already required to calculate gauge or determine which size to knit from available sizes based on body measurements. In fact, one of the resources I include in the description of this video demonstrates how to plug and play your gauge information and body dimensions into a spreadsheet that will do the math for you, which would seem to be a very valuable tool for accommodating those who have a difficult time understanding math or cannot, as you say, learn the process due to the cognitive demand.
But, for argument's sake, what about those who still lie outside of that "inclusive" size range and do not have a chronic illness that hinders their ability to learn (or similar disability)? Perhaps learning to grade a pattern is out of reach for some, like yourself, however for those who will invariably be left out of a specified size range at some point, and for those who are willing and/or able to learn the process of grading for their size, this seems to be a very viable option if they would like to have access to most/all knitting patterns. And if this information were provided within the pattern, in addition to an inclusive range of sizes (either as a link to resources like those I share here, or a tutorial), it would be clear (if not implied) that this designer is aware of not only their limitations to provide size options for EVERYONE, but also their appreciation for knitters of all sizes.
I also believe that before we can classify a designer/pattern as "size inclusive" or criticize them for not being "size inclusive", we need to develop a standard for what is considered "size inclusive". What I illustrate here and in my previous comments is what I would suggest demonstrates size inclusivity, however I would be interested in learning what others consider "size inclusive" as it relates to the range of sizes offered.
In terms of what we should receive for the money we pay, that is subjective as we all value different aspects of things that we purchase and are unaware as consumers how the designer has broken down their cost/price for their design. And most knitting patterns have been graded, just not necessarily to the extent that accommodates everyone (which is exactly the issue). For you, you want to see a large range of sizes that at least includes your own and demonstrates "size inclusivity", and that's valid. For some, they may just want a design that has clear instructions and photos. Different strokes for different folks.
I discuss this with additional detail with folks in the previous comments below and I invite you to participate in those conversations as well.
@@WOOLNEEDLESHANDS There can be varying degrees of size inclusivity. I think the most basic standard by which we can determine if a pattern is size inclusive is if it offers plus sizes as well as straight sizes. A pattern that offers only S/M/L is not size inclusive (because the average woman's clothing size in the US is a 16/18). A pattern that offers up to size 3x may be considered somewhat size inclusive, while a pattern that goes up to 5x is even more inclusive. I recently purchased the Degen Think Tank pattern which offers up to a size 3x, but the designer has stated that she will grade the pattern up for anyone who needs to make a size larger than a 3x. The Degen Think Tank pattern also offers 2 different sets of instructions for smaller chests vs. larger chests. I feel that these pattern features make it very size inclusive.
We agree that including the exact size and shape of every person on earth in a knitting pattern isn't feasible. That's not my definition of size inclusivity (I've never heard anyone define it this way). But you ask the question, what is a realistic/feasible "solution" to humans being so many different sizes and shapes? The examples I listed above have been considered reasonable/feasible solutions by pattern designers.
I think that individual knitters learning to grade patterns for themselves could be a solution that is implemented when the types of solutions I have listed above aren't sufficient. But I do think that the solutions I have listed above should be the primary focus. I don't think expecting every single knitter to learn pattern grading is feasible and I don't think it could serve as a main solution in the way you stated in the video.
I'm not exactly sure what you're saying your version of size inclusivity looks like - It sounds like you might be saying that you feel that for a pattern to be considered size inclusive, it should include an "inclusive range of sizes" plus instructions on how to grade the pattern for sizes outside of that range. Do you mean a pattern should range from say an XS to a 5X and then also have instructions for grading outside of those sizes? Because if so, I'm on board with that. But that sounds very different than what you originally said in the video. Originally, you said that all knitters should learn to grade patterns so we can knit any pattern in our specific size/shape, which makes it sound like 1) the knitter would have to learn the process of pattern grading on their own, not with instructions in each individual pattern, and 2) like pattern makers writing size inclusive patterns isn't part of the solution. Please do clarify.
Ultimately, individual pattern makers will have different standards of how size inclusive they are when they make patterns (and how much extra work they may be willing/able to do for the sake of size inclusivity). Individual knitters will have different standards of what patterns they consider size inclusive enough to buy.
@@haunted_poptart Thank you for your reply. I think that, though I understand where you're coming from here regarding degrees of size inclusivity, it is somewhat gray in that it doesn't provide a fair standard for designers and consumers. I think as a consumer, these degrees can be used as a metric for whether or not that pattern will work on an individual level and I think that's fine and expected, but right now the concept of "size inclusivity" is being used to either promote or demote (in a sense) particular designers (I have to believe that you know what I'm referring to here--), which given the fact that this is currently seen as fluid and varying in degree, is unfair.
In this video, I state that rather than placing so much emphasis on asking designers to grade for (what is currently) an arbitrary number of sizes (as this number of sizes is as you say, varying), we should ask those who are knowledgable to teach us how to grade the patterns ourselves (in other words, learn how to grade patterns ourselves). I did not state that ALL knitters should learn to grade patterns, and though I did not state in the video that this should be included in a knitting pattern along with a range of sizes, I included that opinion in my previous reply here, as well as in all of my replies to previous commenters below. My statement in this video is not intended to mean that ALL emphasis be placed on teaching knitters to do the grading themselves rather than designers providing sizes, but that SOME of the emphasis and energy going into the size inclusivity movement ought to be placed on teaching knitters to individualize patterns using their own resources (and I further add in my initial reply to you) or, ideally, resources provided by the designer, so that in addition to offering a range of sizes (which is the current expectation) patterns are also, in any given case, accessible because of their ability to be further modified. Now, realistically, designers providing this additional resource for grading their design isn't always going to be the case, if it is something that is possible at all. And if/when it is not the case, I argue that knitters should embrace pattern grading (like tailoring in sewing) so that they can access a pattern that does not offer their individual size. That is what I mean by my version of "size inclusivity". This is why having this conversation is important and why I am available in the comments section here to have it with you. You can glean more about my position (and I yours) by reading my (and your) further commentary as my videos are limited in time. However, I think you picked up on my version of size inclusivity in my reply as you paraphrased it quite well.
To further clarify, since you asked, and like I mentioned to a previous commenter, I think providing a range of sizes in a knitting pattern is important and to an extent is feasible. However, I've seen and heard mention that even those patterns with 9 available sizes are not "size inclusive" and to some for various reasons, this may be true. But before we can use that as a metric for quality (of either the pattern or the designer) there should be a standard by which we make that judgement, should it be necessary. And as my video relates the status quo, we do not have a standard. So because we do not have this standard (yet), we should place some energy on educating knitters, or providing knitters with resources for grading patterns to fit their size so that they are still able to access any pattern, should their particular measurements not be included in the range. If a knitter chooses not to go that route, that's their choice. If a designer chooses not to grade a pattern to 10+ sizes, that's their choice. And until there is a standard for what is considered "size inclusive", I do not think labeling a designer as "size inclusive" or "not size inclusive" to publicly value or devalue them is fair (this is in reference to the climate surrounding this issue and not you individually).
In regards to the designer you mention here grading their pattern to accommodate knitters of sizes beyond the 3X, I think that's very generous and I hope that that works for them for the long haul, and if it does, fantastic. But I would like to know how feasible that is for designers, generally speaking, because in that case, we are asking one person to accommodate the needs of potentially quite a few people. Whereas my proposed solution asks one person (the knitter) to do some additional work to meet the needs of one person (themselves) and a 1:1 relationship here far outweighs a 1:1+, in my opinion. I would be curious to know how much of an option that is for designers or how many designers would be willing to do that. And that of course depends on their customer base and volume. This may be feasible for designers with a smaller customer base, but for very popular designers with a high volume of pattern downloads, or even somewhat well-known designers, this could be impractical. I don't know, but I suspect.
I hope this serves as further clarification.
@@WOOLNEEDLESHANDS I guess I'm confused by this "grade your own size" option. If it's so reasonable for a knitter to learn to grade their own size, because there are resources and it's not that hard, then why is it unreasonable to expect a designer to do this to begin with? Conversely, when people say that it's too hard for designers to address all sizes, then why should a knitter who's paying for a pattern have to learn to do so?
I also think "designers can't address ALL shapes and sizes" is a little bit of a red herring. Designers already don't offer literally all sizes, in that a sweater may come in (say) bust sizes of 32", 36", 40", and 44', and a given knitter may have a size 38" bust. The designer doesn't offer the 38" bust knitter's exact size, but that's not a size inclusivity issue. Similarly, not everyone is going to like the way that every design feature looks on their own body shape - for instance, I don't think v-necks look good on my body shape, but that doesn't mean I think someone who designs a v-neck sweater has to include modifications for my body shape that make a v-neck into not a v-neck, b/c the v-neck is their design vision and there are plenty of non-v-neck sweaters out there.
I also find the idea that we can never achieve inclusivity because there will always be SOMEONE outside a given range sort of mendacious, when there are plenty of designers out there who still don't design for anyone larger than an XL. Because we can never truly cater for every size, there's no point in improving matters at all?
In size inclusivity, I'm looking for a garment that will actually fit on a wide range of bodies, no more, no less. And yes, "fit" in that context entails understanding that plus size bodies don't just expand in all directions at regular intervals from smaller sizes, so that for instance someone who's a dress size 24 doesn't have a neck that's twice as wide as someone who's a dress size 12, that kind of thing. But I'm not expecting something that is any more tailored to my specific shape than the 38" bust knitter is.
Maybe one issue is vocabulary. Because to me, "grade" is a very technical term that implies recalculating an entire pattern (in the way that historical costumers often work from one pattern size taken from an extant garment and have to recreate the entire pattern in their size). But people of all sizes have been learning how to "modify" knitting patterns to make them fit their own proportions better for years and years. To name just a few examples, Amy Herzog has published multiple books on this topic; Kim O'Brien Evans and Patty Lyons regularly offer workshops on how to adapt patterns to fit your own specific proportions; Ysolda Teague provided great information about this back in 2011 in Little Red in the City.
The major difference is that while those resources are great for knitters who are larger than the traditional knitting pattern size range, they are not *exclusive to* or *aimed at* larger knitters. They are for everyone because they recognize that not every pattern is going to work for every person's size/shape. That's not about size inclusivity; that's about personal style/comfort preference.
Conversely, saying that the solution to size inclusivity is that knitters need to learn to grade their own patterns is, in effect, saying that larger knitters need to learn to grade their own patterns, because it's larger knitters who won't even have a foundation to start from. The 38" knitter can take the size 32-44 range pattern and *modify* it (they can knit the 36" on bigger needles/with thicker yarn, they can knit the 40" on smaller needles/with thinner yarn; they can do math to split the difference wrt to specific numbers of stitches), or they can just decide they want to wear it with less or more positive ease than written and call it day. But for a knitter with a 54" bust to *grade* a pattern that only goes up to a 44" bust is a much more monumental task.
I guess maybe another way to put this is that *size* inclusivity and *shape* inclusivity aren't actually the same thing at all, and lumping them together makes size inclusivity seem like a nitpicky, impossible to achieve goal that shouldn't be catered to. No one designer can or should be expected to cater to every body shape; not all designs are going to work for all body shapes. And it makes sense for knitters to learn something about modifying patterns for their own body shapes. But that's very different from not being able to find a pattern than actually fits onto your body, which is what size inclusivity seeks to address, and isn't really fairly addressed by requiring larger bodied knitters to grade their own patterns to fit their size (on TOP of modifying patterns to fit their own shape). Especially if it's too hard to ask designers - who are trying to sell their patterns - to grade for larger sizes.
(My apologies for the length of this, it's just something I feel VERY strongly about. Also, I focus on larger-bodied knitters here because that's what I know and think is a significant problem given the average size of American women, but the same holds for people looking for patterns below the smallest sizes, too.)
And another jewel- "It's crafting that makes the stuff extraordinary". This episode is full of witty wisdom. Love it!!
"Do no harm but take no shit" Now that is a great tshirt quote! Another awesome and fun podcast!
@ 21:28 sock do wear out, BUT there is a way to reinforce them before wearing them so they last longer. 😊
I'm so tired of the wool versus acrylic debate because why are we, the crafters, fighting amongst ourselves when we really should be critical of the companies selling acrylic yarns at wool prices? Acrylic yarn is very cheap to produce compared to wool, so what they're charging is exaggerated in that regard, but also since it's becoming the norm, I think fewer people question it simply because they aren't aware. Plus, wool and acrylic are not equals. They both have different properties and can't exactly replace each other except for in appearance. And that's not to say that one is inherently better, but to acknowledge that depending on what you specifically want, one kind of yarn might just suit your expectations more than the other
Ultimately a lot of this comes down to preference. Some people can't stand the feeling of wool and thus prefer acrylic. I don't like how synthetic fibres feel against my skin so I opt for natural ones instead. Plastics are bad for the environment, but so is all fabric and fibre production, so unless you thrifted what you're using I don't wanna hear it (at least not if all you're offering is judgment and not solutions such as how to care for the finished product in the most sustainable way)
Final note: allergies are a thing, as well as sensitivity to different chemicals. These also influence choices a crafter may make, or the requirements for charities and what donations they accept (I know children's hospitals tend to tell you to use very specific cottons, for example)
I always get the urge to tell people that test knitting is not the same thing as tech editing! Test knitters are knitting a pattern they want to knit for themselves anyway, except they volunteer to do it on a deadline and to point out mistakes they happen to come across. And to post on Insta/Ravelry, which they would likely do anyway. Neither indie designers nor craft publishers have the budget to pay test knitters for all sizes of a pattern and provide them with yarn-so if it weren't a volunteer thing, it wouldn't happen at all.
Tech editing, on the other hand, is highly skilled, paid-for work, which goes to the comment about "not everyone who knits should publish patterns." Sure, publish patterns, but if you're charging money for them and want them clear and mistake-free, send them to a tech editor, not just test knitters!
You’re absolutely right here. There is quite a distinction!
Crochet is a HUNGRY BEAST. I am trying to learn to knit partly for that reason.
Loooved your variegated yarn reel!!! Perfect response. I have to respectfully disagree on your take on inclusive sizing, it really bummed me out. I understand that designing patterns is a huge amount of work and inclusive sizing does add to that. However Im not going to buy a sweater pattern that I have do grading on because well, I shouldn't be expected to do extra work (more than I frankly already do) to make something work for me and a smaller person isn't expected to. Im happy to pay for a pattern, and pay more for inclusive sizing. If i follow that line of logic then no one should be expected or bother to include plus size people in the first place, if we should simply be doing for ourselves. Also, Ive tried to figure grading before. Im not a designer and.what i know about grading is that it is difficult and not something I would be confident doing anyway. Would practice change that? Yes, but that sort of frustration would take away from what I get from knitting, meditative joy. Not grading patterns to varied sizes is going to leave plenty of hopefuls outside looking in. Thanks for reading and I really do love your podcast.
I absolutely agree. No, it's not possible for a designer to account for every variation in a human body (torso length, chest size, arm length, sleeve preference, etc.) and yes it's great for knitters to feel empowered to make modifications to their garments. But, a knitwear designer who makes their patterns for a wide range of sizes and includes suggestions for modifications isn't just making my knitting experience nicer. It's telling me that they want to see their patterns on a body like mine. They're telling me that I'm welcome - in their patterns, in their community. A designer who only designs for a small range (of, typically, the smaller end of the size chart) isn't. If I'm going to buy a pattern, I know which one I want.
I have 2 opinions on this. The first is that while arm size and length and other body measurements vary from person to person no matter their size, a lot of patterns (both in knitting and sewing) don't do enough to try to add adjustments for those body measurements as they size up. It's not enough to simply add stitches to the sides of the front and back or the arm. My arm doesn't grow by as much as my hips do from one size to the next, nor does it grow longer simply because I'm bigger. I will often see a pattern that I like in the picture and then intensely dislike in my size because seemingly no thought is taken to how the differing proportions will affect the finished garment.
For that reason, I don't bother thinking about whether the written sizes include mine, but rather whether I can find some photos of what people who are shaped more like me look like in those garments. I have yet to find a pattern that I do not need to adjust in any way, even if it's just accounting for tension.
Therefore, my second thing is that I really wish that the patterns sold in North America included a proper diagram of the design with dimensions (in whatever the standard size is) and row and stitch count so that it would be easier to grade the pattern myself (since I need to do it anyway!). Without that, it's so much work to read the pattern, try to figure out how many rows there are in the waist decrease, how many rows are up to the arm hole, how many to the neck, how many stitches are decreased for the armhole overall, what is the neck width, etc. These things are so much more important than telling me to knit 2 st, decrease 1, knit 20 and then work the pattern for 2 more rows. I don't need the row by row instructions like that! I just want to know how much you decreased for the dimensions you had so that I can figure out the proportions of the design! Then I can adjust it for my size and yarn.
The fact that I have had more luck with Japanese patterns (which I can't read, btw, but which have excellent diagrams) than with western ones says a lot!
acrylic is something I've decided never to buy again if I can help it, but it was also absolutely necessary to let me get started knitting. I'm poor. when I first started knitting, I couldn't afford to pay more than $3-4 at a time. so I would buy a new skein of acrylic every time I needed a color I didn't have (and as a queer pride merch maker, that happened pretty often).
nowadays, I have a stash of acrylic yarn I'm still working through, so I'm trying to buy plant-based yarns instead (or wool if someone wants it for a commission). at this point, I'm capable of selling my knitting and my time costs much more than any difference in materials price, so I can afford that as long as I stick to only buying yarn when I need it for something. but I won't knock other poor people using acrylic to get to that point.
I can’t tell you how refreshing not only your perspective is here, but also how you shared it. Meaningful, relatable, respectful. No that you need me to tell you that, but thank you. ❤️
Ha! I related to the comment about buying a sweater. I've often spent way more knitting it myself than it would cost to buy it. I'm talking about cashmere, angora and other expensive yarns. And I know in advance it's going to fit me! One more thing is pattern updating. I bought a lovely pattern about a year ago and I've been holding off making it because I'm busy with other projects. Between the time I bought the pattern and today, it's been updated no less than 3 times. I have no idea what the changes were but I'm sure glad I didn't start making it as soon as it was published.
You never fail to make me laugh out loud, Tayler! Thank you!
I have been asked numerous times if I would sell my crochet Amigurumi items and I mostly say no. I enjoy making them but I don’t want to have to make them. I made a 2 ft. tall Raggedy Ann doll a couple of months ago and really made someone mad that I wouldn’t sell it to her. I made it all in cotton which was about $35 + just in yarn and it took me hours. I told her that I didn’t think she would be willing to pay $500 for Raggedy Ann and Andy. That is probably the worst part about monetizing your craft, dealing with people. 🙄
Thank you so much for watching Catherine. ❤ And you’re absolutely right about monetizing your craft. It adds that extra element of pressure that can be very deflating.
I love these videos. I think it’s so healthy to be able to disagree and still be civil to and respect one another’s opinions. I agree that the lily sugar and cream cotton makes fabulous dishcloths!!
I 100% agree. There's no reason to be uncivil. We accomplish so much more if we all agree or disagree respectfully and without expectation. Thank you so much for watching! ❤️
That. These episodes are such a good example of how to be okay with disagreeing about something we are also passionate about. We need more of this attitude in the real world. :)
These videos are such fun! I just wanted to share what I do with some of the 87 gazzillion knit projects I've made but don't need - I have no problem donating a finished knit. Sometimes I just donate the yarn, but lately I've made items with the yarn and then donated the finished project. I tell myself that someone is out there looking for this particular item or they're thrifting and find a wonderful knitted gift for someone and how great they're going to feel when they find something handmade where they least expect it.
I love this so much. ❤️
knitting is more time consuming and requires different types of tools, circular needles, straight needles, cord to hold your stiches so can be more expensive in those. While crochet requires more yarn so can be more expensive in the long run. but both are cool. stitch markers are annoying as the plastic ones break and I loose them too often to get more durable/ expensive ones.
agree on the more time consuming, but in terms of tools, a lot of things are actually not as necessary as they might seem initially. Most things can be made with circular needles with a long (100cm+) cable as far as I understand, I actually don't own any straight needles except for some dpns I picked up when I first started the hobby which have never seen use outside of my first project (which i actually finished on circulars for hand health reasons). As for holding stitches, you can also just use scrap yarn which you might even have left over as early as after your first project. stitch markers are also something that can be substituted for something already in your home like safety pins for example!
"be the chaos gremlin you wish to see in the world" is amazing. I think I may need to pick up cross stich again so I can have this visable from where I usually craft hehe
Yeah a Cross Stitcher....it's my muse!
Right!? It was so good, I couldn't pass it up. In fact, I can't remember who shared it because the post disappeared from my stories before I could check, but I remembered it perfectly. 😊
I didnt know Sugar n Creme was considered a poor quality cotton yarn, ive been using them for socks! 😂
Shortsleeved sweaters are great when you are perimenopausal and if you wear a full sweater you feel like someone set you on fire.
AMEN! Short sleeved sweaters are all I wear unless it’s in the teens outside. Which doesn’t happen often where I live!
Enjoyed this so much. You are articulate and seem to have a lot of common sense. I love how you can disagree with the comment without belittling the commenter. You make me smile. And you inspire me to keep creating for the joy of it.
Thank you so much for this comment Karen. I’m glad you watched and enjoyed. Knowing that I help to inspire you makes my day. ❤️
"Do no harm and take no shit." Oh I love you Tayler 😂
As a crocheter of 20yrs and a knitter of 3yra, the cost is about the same. I think it took longer for the crochet community to catch on to what high quality products were, but you can make crochet as expensive as knitting and knitting as cheap as crochet.
I can buy a set of $80 clover amore crochet hook a crazy expensive Tunisian or changeable set, I can also buy it bamboo knitting needles or Susan Bates metal straight.
I'm also kind of over the" fact "hat there is knitting yarn and crocheting yarn. If it's a fiber you can art it.
I really love quite a lot of your points and we don’t all have to agree. That being said - I ver much disagree about knitters being expected to grade out to their own size. When I started knitting, it was hard to get sweaters past a 44” bust so I didn’t knit any for myself. It was like going to a store and not seeing your size, you watch everyone else be included while you’re stuck going to catalogs or online. As designers have started expanding to my size and beyond - not only did I not have to grade my own patterns, but I got to see people with bodies like mine knitting the sweater! I was finally represented!!!!
Inclusive sizing is about so much more than doing the math but about including PEOPLE.
Another plug is like to make for size inclusiveness, is asking more men to test knit, including more information about shoulder fit in non-yoke or non-raglan sweaters because typically men’s shoulders have a different proportion to their chest circumference than women’s.
Very well said! You put into words some ideas that I wanted to add to my comment but was struggling to articulate.
I understand what you're saying here in regards to feeling represented and I've expounded on my feelings regarding this issue quite extensively in previous comment replies below. However I will just pose a couple of questions. What about folks who are of a bust size larger than yours and one that is not represented in a pattern? You have been included, yet they have not. Is it enough for those folks to acknowledge that the designer has "tried"? Or would it not be considered more "inclusive" for the designer to (acknowledging their limitations to meet the needs of everyone) offer the information/tutorial needed to adjust the pattern to fit the size of any individual not represented in the size range (essentially making the pattern accessible to anyone)? Not only is this a learning experience that will help build the skill set of the knitter (not unlike a pattern providing information and tutorials for executing a particular technique), it will empower the knitter and make accessible so many additional patterns and it emphasizes an understanding that PEOPLE are different sizes and shapes and making patterns accessible to them is important.
I've discussed this in more detail in comments below and I invite you to check those out and include your thoughts there as well.
@@WOOLNEEDLESHANDS I would love to say I’m savvy enough to find the comments you mentioned but I haven’t yet 😂 what I would personally propose is that like some people in the sewing world do, designers offer to grade a pattern for someone who’s bust size hasn’t been included. If I’m going to do the math for a sweater, I’m not going to be paying premium pattern prices ($9-$15).
Just anecdotally, I tend to see crocheters using cheaper yarn more often than knitters do so the price for the average project might even out, but maybe that’s just among crochet influencers.
Crochet just uses significantly more yarn. So it’s way easier to use 7+skeins of cheap yarn for a blanket, rather than 7 skeins of expensive 20 bucks a pop yarn. I’m a crocheter who just started knitting this week. Crochet is quicker but more expensive due to yarn usage. But with just a single pack of hooks you can do anything. I did a rug recently for my hallway to use up some old partial yarns my abuela gave me. But knitting? Oof. I can’t even get a few rows in (I don’t know if they’re called rows in knit) without messing up.
I use Lily Sugar n Cream for my rags, especially for cleaning my chinchilla cage, and I cannot even fathom how much money I’ve saved from using it instead of paper towels. I STAN sugar n cream it is incredible for rags
how do you wash them?
I made a gorgeous blanket with that! After several washes it is soft and supple and is holding up extremely well.
Thank you for the hot takes! You know I was thinking. One of the best things I ever did on my sock journey (always have a pair on the go!) was take a class on knitting a sock that fit. Actually measuring in different spots, swatching at least initially to find your gauge for the fabric you like and would last longer in a sock. All these things. I promptly measured all the people in my life that I knit for and honed their specific sock recipes so I know what will fit the person I’m thinking of when I knit a pair. No generic one size fits all. You know what? They all, myself included, love the fit of their specific socks and it makes them want to wear them. When I eventually turn to garments I know I will have to adjust for my shape and I’ll figure it out then. I’d sooner have something comfortable and fitted to me then making myself fit into a standard, even an inclusive standard.
I absolutely LOVED this video. I have always appreciated your unapologetic approach to this craft you clearly enjoy. I thought your approach to the “opinions “ you touched on in this video encompassed this and a true inclusion to the views, methods, and opinions of individuals. Thank you.
I both knit and crochet but if I had to think about it, my investment in knitting was a higher upfront cost. I have wooden and metal versions of Straight, Circular and DPNs while I've gone through a few different sets of crochet hooks I do think I've spent a lot less there -but- thats a one time fee for most people and needling hoarding is never necessary once you settle on a set you like.
Re the pricey needles: knit picks or we crochet has really affordable interchangeable sets. I am so in love with mine i got the minis as well. And it's much cheaper to get a tip set and expand your cable choice than acrue fixed or straight needles in all the sizes and lengths you might need.
Re varigated are "matronly":
I'm literally working on a neon goth sweater as I'm listening and it so so fun and youthful i can't wait to wear it. It alternates black rows and varigated pink/blue/purple rows that looks like bubblegum or cotton candy colors.
I originally got the varigated for a popcorn stitch scarf but changed my mind and spent ages trying to figure out a new use for it.
@@syddlinden8966neon goth sweater sounds amazing!! Can I ask what yarn/pattern you are using?
Here's a hot take on some knitting advice/patterns when it comes to what shape garments look good on a person. I've seen reference to "....will minimize..." or " ...will make you look slimmer" so many times when referring to how to choose a garment shape. I find this just ICKY. Let's try "....will enhance....", "...will fit those with xyz more comfortably" instead. I have wide shoulders relative to other measurements, so basically I have to make shoulders that are at least 2 sizes larger to accommodate them, then adjust down to the suitable size for the rest. However, I could care less whether they are minimized by a certain style. What I do want is to not have my sweater creep up in my armpits and feel like a straight jacket. Maybe I would feel differently if I was dealing with a different body part being considerably larger than the rest, but still, why would I necessarily want to minimize any of it? I don't get it. Enhance, comfort, works best with xyz yarn, etc are much more body positive ways to approach style. Just my opinion :-)
I don’t comment much, but….I love you! You are so tactful, to the point, and honestly intelligent! Please keep up your wonderful commentary!
I love those videos! They're so fun 😁
One thing I don't like about size inclusivity is when people in podcasts apologize for showing a FO that is not size inclusive. Unless you're gonna hide it forever in a drawer, people are gonna see it anyway.
Maybe those people anticipate the negative comments of others (which should not happen IMO) but PLEASE PEOPLE knit any design you want, whether it's size inclusive or not. I understand if people don't wanna encourage designers who don't publish size inclusive patterns and I respect that decision but let's say you already had the pattern or someone gifts it to you or whatever. Knit it if you like it. You can tell people that it's not inclusive but please don't apologize. There are enough things to feel bad about in life, I don't think this should be one of them.
Speaking as someone who benefits from larger sizes:
Bigger sizes are not always equal. I’ve bought patterns from big name designers who expanded their ranges but the grading is/was crap. I’d rather buy a well fitted pattern which is slightly smaller, knowing that I’d need to alter. Not a popular opinion😊
A hot response--what do people do to their socks that they are destroyed after three wearings?! I've got some socks that are going on 10 years old and have never had to be darned. Granted, I only wear my wooly socks in the winter and I'm not, say, hiking 10 miles through rugged terrain while wearing them, but still! 🤷♀ Speaking of decades... As you noted, Lily Sugar and Cream is da bomb for dishcloths and similar items. I've also got some that are going on 10 years old. The colors have faded, of course, but they're still structurally sound and clean great. I wouldn't knit a sweater out of it, but it's definitely not garbage yarn.
Lily sugar and cream is a great yarn for hot pads and dish rags. I hold 3 strands and knit a square for the hot pads and give them as gifts. They’re very popular with my friends.
It really is fantastic for that!
The size inclusion poster does make an important point. I do bespoke sweaters for my (adult) children because I like being able to make them the exact sweater they were after (including a short sleeve sweater for my perpetually cold younger daughter to wear in the summer). My daughters are vastly different in size though - older daughter is a 3XL and younger daughter is a 3 XS. I normally do top down sweaters and the set up and division for sleeves require entirely different ratios for each size. You cannot just adjust stitch counts and keep going for bigger or smaller sweaters. To make them fit correctly, you really need to understand the structure of the sweater and how it will fit on the body wearing it.
This is a very good point and one that illustrates the need for tailoring (pattern adjustment) in the knitting skill set. A designer can only go so far for a pattern that will be knit by folks of myriad sizes and shapes.
@@WOOLNEEDLESHANDS Exactly. Tailoring knit clothing is an essential skill for knitters and crocheters.
Exactly! it is impossible to make a pattern for everybody type in the world! The knitter needs the tool/skill to make adjustments! Just like if you buy jeans, know how to hem!
Thank you for seeing the value in acrylic yarn. Do to my financial situation acrylic is basically all I use because it is all I can afford, and my craft skills and acrylic yarn are how I manage to give Christmas to 14 people that I love every year. Often, especially when searching for patterns, I feel a bit shamed or snubbed because I simply cannot afford the beautiful hand dyed yarn I dream of one day having. All that should matter is that the maker is finding joy and peace in the act of knitting/crocheting, and the people who are receiving the items love and use them. I just love your channel and your vibe. Thanks for being here.
It’s my pleasure to speak to the value of acrylic yarn Kate and I’m glad that this may also provide that little boost of confidence when you choose yarn for your projects. You should never feel shamed or snubbed and what you’re doing for those you live during the holidays is wonderful.
Thank you for watching Kate. ❤️
My go to is always socks. Its so portable and the basic pattern is lodged firmly in my brain. I do, however, have socks that are more than 5 years old. And i wear only my hand knits. Granted...i am 74 and no longer go dancing, ect...lol
I was weaving loose threads while watching this with headphones on and laughing loudly. My husband at the other side of the room thought I was watching a comedy. Surprise a knitting podcast! Love the knitting community and like your take on things. I have learned quite a bit on your podcast and appreciate hearing opinions on different topics. I agree what works for one person may not work for someone else….I aim to listen with an open mind and heart…. Always! Have a great day and happy crafting!
I love this Samantha. Thank you for watching. I’m so glad you enjoyed it and you’re absolutely right. What works for one may not work for another. And by golly, that’s ok. ❤️❤️❤️
Have a great day!
Every pattern doesn’t look great on every body shape. It’s not just about sizing. It’s about shape and what is being accented. There are patterns I will never buy that are gorgeous but will never look great on me. And that’s ok.
You are so calm & philosophical! This was definitely fun & funny! Take no shit!
"Do no harm but take no shit" 😆 pleeeeeeeeease put that on a t-shirt!
Fantastic episode Tayler! As usual, you've got us exploring, diving deep into our emotions. One note about acrylic yarn: as someone who knits and crochets for charity, the suggested supplies are always acrylic to try and avoid reactions/allergies for those who are ill as well as ease in laundering. It's a choice between giving comfort and worrying about micro plastics in the water, but for me, comforting another human being right now, this second, wins every time. Thanks as always Tayler--you are the best. Hugs from Canada.
I think this insight is very valuable and I agree with you 100%. Charity and caring for those in need in that moment is priority number one and you’re a very kind soul for acknowledging that. Thank you so much for watching and for your kind words. It means a great deal to me Lori. ❤️
I've got a hot take for ya! I'll get butchered for it, but the beanie/toque hats with the "reservoir tip" at the top make people look liken they are wearing fuzzy condoms on their heads. They look ridiculous. on everyone. LOL
100% yes.
💯 agree
Crocheting could devour an entire yarn store and still go back for seconds. There is ZERO chance that knitting is more expensive long-term. This is also why yarn snobbery sends me into a blind rage. So many times it's coming from knitters 😂
Everything i knit whether for customers, for family, friends or myself i enclose a small ball of the yarn and button in case of loss and a yarn label with washing instructions enclosed. I make sure to cover both during the exchange. No, i dont feel badly about oassing on infi. Once done and passed over ut us no longer ny concern. I can dance right on ti the next project! Right now im making protheses socks for a double amputee. So interesting. There are no patterns for these or even guidelines. So far i have frogged three times. Ideas?
nice video, I wanted to point out 2 things I feel are also important. I am someone who doesn't like knitting synthetic fiber but I feel Synthetic fibers are just as valid. Not all acrylic and synthetic yarn is flammable it depends on what chemical treatments have been used. The second and more important point is its not just about body shape and size when considering what a person thinks looks good on them. I am a larger bodied person who loves showing skin and fell confident in my hoochie daddy shorts and sheer tanks. What's most important about size inclusive clothing is does it make the wearer fell comfortable and confident in it. As always I highly enjoyed your vireo keep up the great work and have a great day.
EXCELLENT points on both counts. Especially wearing what makes you feel good. 100%. LOVE this. Thank you Chip. ❤
I love Granny square blankets. However, having made a few, I would rather buy them at my thrift store already made for 10 dollars, versus 50 to 100 in yarn if not using scraps. I am just finishing a Granny square blanket that I have been working on for nearly 12 years. That's because I have put it aside for more interesting projects for years at a time. I am planning a move and would rather not move UFOs.
I only gift to people that I care for and those people know the work and love I put into the gift. No need to emphasize it. They also know that I am giving them something to love on and not to sit in the closet. Love it ‘til it’s bare and then you get a new one. I do make sure I use the appropriate yarn for my recipient. A new mom doesn’t need more work so I don’t give them hand wash only items. I usually do superwash and just tell them, wash as usual but pull it out to dry. If that’s to tough, I get acrylic blends. Because acrylic is okay to use. Great video. Thanks for the 30 minute break. 😊
I 100% agree about monetization… knitting/crochet is a relaxing hobby IMO if I start selling it’s a job and not fun
I love the music you used to quash the "variegated yarn is matronly" myth!!
Love the end monologue, Taylor, very powerful and well articulated. There is a whole new layer of joy in designing and creating designs of your own, and this joy can only be accessed through a skillset as you described: shaping, grading, understanding the anatomy of knitwear, improvising. I learnt this initially because I wanted my knits to fit meticulously, and now I just won't have it any other way. Handmaking has its true power in personalized *fit*, every inch of your hard work is seen and felt. It is absolutely worth it.
I was surprised when I started knitting that patterns called for just as much yarn as needed for crochet. As for the tools and accessories, I love collecting them! I find knitting more expensive than crochet because I'm interested in better quality yarns. For 10 years I was happy to churn out bright, acrylic crochet blankets and cardigans. Now that I'm a knitter I prefer natural fibres and I'm trying to find yarns that don't make me itch!
It was the song choice for the "non matronly" variegated yarn garments that did it for me haha
I couldn’t help myself. ☺️☺️☺️🔥
A lot of knits are very boxy, because squares and rectangles are easy, so full agree on that
As for 'sharing' patterns, I agree with Taylor - I treat patterns like I do recipes or books. I paid for it, so I feel comfortable sharing it with friends. But a teaching situation is different. I am attending the KAL knitting retreat this weekend and am happy to say that the 'workshop' project last spring was designed by the person giving the course and she included the pattern. In this session the pattern is by another designer and the attendees had to purchase it.
Acrylic yarn is great for crochet. Crochet uses so much yarn. Crochet is also way easier even though I’m a lefty and before being able to get online, I learned from my right handed abuela when I was a kid. But left handed didn’t translate well to knitting (I just started this week trying and failing miserably I can’t get past a few rows [are they rows in knit??] before messing up and having to restart) so I taught myself right handed knit. Knit is hard. I’m determined to learn and I don’t understand patterns but I want to make Harry Potter house sweaters for my family
Edit: luckily I have plenty of cheap yarn to practice on!
I really enjoyed your commentary!
I would say the biggest issue with sharing patterns is when the digital pattern is shared as well. It’s just the same as sharing a music file and the reason Napster and KaZaA got shut down. 😊 I believe in valuing and respecting the designers and I feel like they deserve to be compensated for their work.
Yes. You’re right. Sharing digital content is a whole other issue and one that has legal ramifications.
Love your take on variegated yarn. Great images. It can look matronly, but it can also be joyous to work with. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I am mainly a crochet mama, but your channel is a while vibe. And to be honest I generally stay away from a lot of knitting channels unless they're doing yarn reviews. I watch your stuff. Excellent job. Happy New Year 🎉🎉🎉
I tell people that when I knit socks for them it’s an act of love because of how quickly they wear out. 😊
You’ve said it so well. I’m adding that you should always use yarn with nylon for socks. I wear out the toe tops quickly so I use double yarn for the toe portion. If you wear out the heels, try a different heel like eye of partridge. Love my socks!
This is such great advice Kim and I actually just picked up a spool of Nylon to use with some all-wool yarn I want to use for socks. Would you recommend using it for just those heavy-wear sections or for the whole sock?
🤣About knitting lace and cables..."yeh, that's why it's hard"....the last few minutes of this video had me cracking up, love it!