Harrison, I'm not through the video yet so apologies if you do cover this eventually. For the bezel design. The bezel is using two different scales. You have the base 30 pulsometer scale and then the tachymeter scale. The reason the white starts a little off center is because the tachymeter scale goes to that 60 dot and the front end of the pulsometer scale doesn't need to have any text because no human would have a pulse that already pulsed 15 times in that 1 to 5 seconds range. It might look a little odd but it makes the tachymeter scale functional to that 60 times per minute while not imposing on the usefulness of the pulsometer scale.
I ve just try it (quartz black n white), and I dont know what I didnt like in it. Perhaps the dial, or the subdials. I liked the proportions, the bracelet , but smthg was a deal breaker that I didnt know what IS it
@@R.Maamri Sometimes it's hard to tell where is the ick. For you maybe it's the combination of little bit of everything that makes you feel like it. For me personally it's a very balanced piece. Still wear it few times a week.
Tissot are a great brand without any doubt. Great value even for the more expensive models from the brand considering what you get. An in house Tissot movement would cost a fortune to produce and could hike the price considerably. Using the very well proven Valjoux 7753 minus the self winding rotor therefore makes a lot of sense. I don't think Tissot are overlapping Longines though. The prices may overlap but the specs at that crossover point do not. As much as I like this watch I'll be sticking with my panda PRX chronograph but if I didn't have that I might have been tempted by the 516. On my wrist today is the PRX digital that allegedly nobody asked for 35mm mirror face version. I actually really like it. I remember round case digital LCD watches four decades ago and this one brings a smile to my face. A retro digital classic. Many thanks for sharing Harrison (as always) it's always interesting to hear your thoughts.
Open Casebacks Cost No more to produce than a Solid Caseback. I have a $60 Watch with an Open Caseback. With that said, I Don't care for this watch as it looks generic as shit. And the review was awful. The worst thing you can do is Not to convey and demonstrate how the Action of the Pushers feel on a Chrono watch? So, you lost me...sorry mate!
Love this and so nice. I am wearing the Tissot Sea Star 2000 with blue green waves which I love. Tissot punches above its weight. Dial, hands, markers, movement all well done. This new chrono is very interesting.
I just tried this on today and it’s great!! It wears wonderfully on wrist and the bracelet is super nice. Yes it doesn’t have a quick adjust system but for a big brand, sub $2000, mechanical chronograph it really is a great deal! Now if we compare this to the new Christopher Ward quartz chronometer chrono, the CW is much better for the money.
Truely said, I have a choose difficulty between Longines Conquest Chrono. and Tissot PR516 Chrono. Longines is better in finishing and automatic. But double the price.
Wearing the Hamilton Intra-Matic panda chrono today - another vintage-inspired affordable chronograph. The Tissot looks nice! There's a big market gap for relatively small, not-too-thick sports chronos that this model fits into well. Do you think the extra grand for the Longines is worth it?
I do think it’s worth it in terms of build quality but Tissot is definitely catching up. With that said, Longines is also getting really good with the new upgrades to the Hydroconquest GMT!!
Try a grand more recent grand Seiko on, the quality of the bracelet is insane, it’s just the lack of on the fly adjustment that ruins it, no biggie for me though
@@Rodolfoguerra12 went to their flagship boutique in Manhattan and while yes the dial, the hands and the case is impressive, I found some movement finishing and THE bracelet is really lackluster, well, grand seikos really meant to be worn on strap either way... Unless they're designing bracelet that much more unique and coherent with their design, I think they should've stay in Longines price range instead of going upmarket against Credor, Omega and Rolex.
@@watchnerds I own the GMT Quartz and the quality is amazing, even the bracelet at least for me. Also own Omega, Rolex, Tudor, I love them all equally for different reasons.
I have an automatic PRS 516….Why make the newer model a downgrade to manual wind? Seems a very strange decision to me.. but I guess a 68hr power reserve is a compensating factor.. 🤔lovely watch though.
In-house movement is a term word that many Swiss brands throw around, while still quietly working with various manufacturers or buying off a movement manufacturer altogether, instead of themselves directly producing the movements. As long as we can see things like higher magnetic resistance, better finishing and perhaps better accuracy, off-the-shelf are totally fine even for higher priced pieces, within that $2 - 5k range. The more in-house a brand becomes, the more expensive the service costs are going to go. Don't think Tissot owners would want to pay Omega money for regular servicing.
I would not consider this piece simply because of the mineral crystal. I also wouldn't consider the Longines Conquest Chronograph because of its modular movement. What I recommend is the Hamilton Jazzmaster Performer Chronograph.
I have a very unpopulsr tissot luxury powermatic 80 white dial on bracelet. I have to say the bracelet is insanely good, even compared to rolex oyster feels more solid. The step dial in person adds so much more tridimensionality and the finishing is insane.
My 1st proper watch is a Tissot Seastar 2000 the blue dial with blue fabric strap and I absolutely love it. I’m seriously considering this watch as I’m looking at something smaller than the Seastar, I want a Motorsport style watch and chronograph also, it reminds me of my dads 70’s Breitling 🥰and I’m really happy with my Seastar and from what I hear the Valjoux 7753 is a much better movement than the regularly trashed powermatic 80 movement even though I’ve had no problems with it myself Thanks for the good vid and making me spend $1000 more on my next watch 😆✌🏽
I am not sure about the complaints about the price of this particular piece.. Three are no chronographs with mechanical or automatic movements under this price. Except maybe the Chinese Seagull, but I believe Baltic is selling that on the same price as the Tissot. A micro-brand. You forgot to mention that it has a nivachron balance wheel, making it magnetic resistant. And that is regulated to -5, +5 seconds. And with a 100 m of water resistance. And below 14 mm thickness, you simply cannot get better than this. I'm seriously considering buying this. My points of criticism comes from the pushers, they are not as snappy as I would've expect and the clasp is from another movie.
Can't believe they settled for the Mineral instead of the Sapphire crystal, for the price range I believe Sapphire crystal should be automatic for this watch especially since all my cheaper Tissot automatics are made with Sapphire 😢🤔
@@jasongultjaeff9397 I actually thought he was originally referring to the bezel and glass face, I checked the watch details separately and saw it's Sapphire crystal for the face, For a moment I was so bummed out 🤣🤣 Thanks for the relief 🙌🔥
They just did an exact looking edition of their PR516 back in the 70s, don't see any particular strategy in goind back into vintage since it's almost like this for every brand right now...
Better bargain for the price than this for sure. This kind of price is way out of Tissot's league. You're up near Tudor and easily into Longines or Oris.
@@Ascendsean35 i m looking Longines hydroconquest automatic at this price! Also, average people see a very expensive Tissot and a Longines looks much better on the wrist or a entry model Tudor, you re right!
I like this one. Quartz would have been okay, but I think the sub-dials are in the wrong position. It just looks weird. I like my Tissot PRX with glacier blue dial but today I'm wearing my Rolex GMT Pepsi.
I suspect Tissot aren't really trying to eat from Longines, I think everyone is heading towards higher value/prices (as you said just after I started typing this)
I think the "game" they are playing is marking up the unit the first quarter or 2 of the year only to slash prices to a more affordable price the holiday season. I expect to see these hover around the $1200-$1250 price range by October of this year. As has been happening with there higher ticket items year over year. Where in $1200 for this would make a sweet pick up. They did the same thing with the sideral. Paid $1095 when first came out..... hovering at $695 now. Both are very toolish in nature.
nkuwan You are so well-informed about luxury watches. You've obviously done your due diligence and the comparison to the US is very informative...because of course, I live in New York. thank you very much
Lol, Rolex churning out 1.1 million watches has mass produced movements. Tissot is using an in house movement, ETA is from the same group. Longines is determined to squish Tudor. Longines has better heritage, and produced it's own designs, unlike the Tudor homage brand, dedicated to cheaper chunky vintage Rolex.
Even sub 200 quid ali express watches offer on the fly micro adjust clasps. The pressed flip lock style just isnt acceptable at this price point any more. Also on a personal note i can never bond with a watch with a matt black/grey dial. They dont have enough visual interest and i eventually get bored. The longines with its sunburst dial looks like a much more expensive and interesting product
I’ll subscribe to your channel when you review the Breitling Galactic 41 with big date window and black dial. That is my grail which I have taken all around the world. I prefer mines over the Patek Naultilus since it has a rotating bezel too. Thanks Chisholm
Tissot should be priced to be a nice "one and done" watch for the average person who wants to spend 400-600. Anything much above that price doesn't make sense to me. Seriously doubt these models will hold their value long term either
Honestly I don’t mind a bit of progressive cost change over a few decades, so long as the quality and brand identity is maintained or even improved. At that point the increased cost to produce is earned through hard work and dedication to the supporters that got them there. Now if Tudors all hit 10k+ by 2030 we’re in a for a messed up watch market and a ton more Seikos are gonna be sold.
Tissot brand will(probably) never produce an in-house movement cause the don’t wont to compete with other brand in swatch group that are positioned higher in hierarchy such as Omega and Glashutte Original who are doing that job. Even Longines isn’t producing their own movements but rather having their movements being produced from ETA exclusively just for them and those movements are slightly better modified than movements found in lover range of Swatch family.
Scusa se scrivo in italiano ma non conosco l'inglese ho visto il Video con il traduttore. Video scritto molto bene. Sei bravo perché dici le cose in maniera esatta. A me non e piaciuto il logo del orologio. La scritta Tissot potevano farla con il logo Tissot degli anni 70 avrebbe avuto un fascino più indovinato all originale . I contatori cronografici di forma rotonda sono belli, ma negli anni 70 erano di forma quadrata Non è un orologio che se lo guardi da lontano lo riconosci subito....la forma la puoi confondere con un orologio di qualsiasi casa. Il modello Tissot al quarzo ha un fondello chiuso con un bel disegno in acciaio. Il fondello trasparente in vetro di questo modello ci permette di guardare un calibro industriale. Il prezzo del orologio nuovo per me è un No. È molto furbo chi lo compra usato in buone condizioni. Il valore dell orologio sarà più economico e giusto per questo modello. Non è un orologio da collezione ma per una raccolta il mio personale punto di vista. Grazie per la pazienza per leggere il mio lungo commento
First of all tissot had 2000 eur models before not just last 3 year or so,prs 516 automatic last two generations are in that price range and they are.great watches,but all of watch you tubers are ignoring them because of 45 mm size,and also longines is using eta movements, they are just modefied for them,and so is this one for tissot,please do some researche and be objective
Handled it irl, need better bracelet and clasp ans they need to shave the midcase thinner by 1mm, especially this being manual wind... better movement finishing... then they can charge that price smh
@sarthaksharma5790 , man, I have nothing against Zenith. Moreover, I like it, but look at the Chronomaster Sport Yoshida editions. For instance, the rainbow one. That is a pure copy of the Daytona
That's a pretty simplistic take. At that rate, they are all homages to the Speedmaster. While they may share some characteristics, all the watches you've mentioned bring different things to the table.
@theaussiewhinger , if we look at the Speedy and Daytona now, they have totally different philosophies, whereas it's clear that Zenith did try to imitate the Daytona style. I mean, just look at the same kind of bracelet, the outer massive tachymeter scale, applied markers, absolutely identical style of hands. Speedy doesn't have any of these
i had the prs 516 automatic , day date not chrono since 2003 . still working great and looking great . very robust and reliable watch .
Harrison, I'm not through the video yet so apologies if you do cover this eventually.
For the bezel design. The bezel is using two different scales. You have the base 30 pulsometer scale and then the tachymeter scale. The reason the white starts a little off center is because the tachymeter scale goes to that 60 dot and the front end of the pulsometer scale doesn't need to have any text because no human would have a pulse that already pulsed 15 times in that 1 to 5 seconds range.
It might look a little odd but it makes the tachymeter scale functional to that 60 times per minute while not imposing on the usefulness of the pulsometer scale.
This might be the most beautiful Tissot I've ever seen.
Agreed. I never considered buying a Tissot until I saw this model.
Tissot reintroduced itself as a player with the gentleman
ETA is inhouse. Same company.
If you go to their boutique in NYC on 5th Ave, they have an all gold Gentleman priced at $11,995, that's not listed online.
someone post a picture of the all gold tissot gentleman, i want to see that bracelet in gold
I am very happy with my first manual wound watch. The PR 516 looks amazing & feels great on wrist, worth every penny. Grreat job Tissot👏👏👏
Do you know the weight of the watch?
Got the Quartz version in black color and it's very nice.
I ve just try it (quartz black n white), and I dont know what I didnt like in it. Perhaps the dial, or the subdials. I liked the proportions, the bracelet , but smthg was a deal breaker that I didnt know what IS it
@@R.Maamri Sometimes it's hard to tell where is the ick. For you maybe it's the combination of little bit of everything that makes you feel like it. For me personally it's a very balanced piece. Still wear it few times a week.
@@nerijus734 enjoy it
Tissot are a great brand without any doubt. Great value even for the more expensive models from the brand considering what you get. An in house Tissot movement would cost a fortune to produce and could hike the price considerably. Using the very well proven Valjoux 7753 minus the self winding rotor therefore makes a lot of sense. I don't think Tissot are overlapping Longines though. The prices may overlap but the specs at that crossover point do not. As much as I like this watch I'll be sticking with my panda PRX chronograph but if I didn't have that I might have been tempted by the 516. On my wrist today is the PRX digital that allegedly nobody asked for 35mm mirror face version. I actually really like it. I remember round case digital LCD watches four decades ago and this one brings a smile to my face. A retro digital classic. Many thanks for sharing Harrison (as always) it's always interesting to hear your thoughts.
This is another hit. Love it. Seriously considering getting one. Need to talk to the wife… 😎😅
Nice video, as always. 👍
Thanks mate!!
Open Casebacks Cost No more to produce than a Solid Caseback. I have a $60 Watch with an Open Caseback. With that said, I Don't care for this watch as it looks generic as shit. And the review was awful. The worst thing you can do is Not to convey and demonstrate how the Action of the Pushers feel on a Chrono watch? So, you lost me...sorry mate!
Love this and so nice. I am wearing the Tissot Sea Star 2000 with blue green waves which I love. Tissot punches above its weight. Dial, hands, markers, movement all well done. This new chrono is very interesting.
I just tried this on today and it’s great!! It wears wonderfully on wrist and the bracelet is super nice. Yes it doesn’t have a quick adjust system but for a big brand, sub $2000, mechanical chronograph it really is a great deal! Now if we compare this to the new Christopher Ward quartz chronometer chrono, the CW is much better for the money.
Truely said, I have a choose difficulty between Longines Conquest Chrono. and Tissot PR516 Chrono. Longines is better in finishing and automatic. But double the price.
The appearance is very different, need to choose？？😂😂
Wearing the Hamilton Intra-Matic panda chrono today - another vintage-inspired affordable chronograph. The Tissot looks nice! There's a big market gap for relatively small, not-too-thick sports chronos that this model fits into well. Do you think the extra grand for the Longines is worth it?
I do think it’s worth it in terms of build quality but Tissot is definitely catching up. With that said, Longines is also getting really good with the new upgrades to the Hydroconquest GMT!!
It’s gorgeous, but for that price, Tissot needs to include a quick adjust clasp. My $300 Erebus has one.
Omega De Ville Chrono. Year 2000. It is such a sexy watch with its 36mm case.
I am a male nurse in Zurich, Switzerland, and my patient gave me this Tissot.
lol a male nurse. You're probably gay too
im coming to work in Schweiz then
@@roybrolsbeak thats not a bad idea, brother.
ETA is Swatch, which includes Tissot. They should’ve done a closed case back to make the watch that much thinner.
Thanks God no pointless crown guard on a chronograph and no date. Congratulations Tissot. Beautiful watch.❤
Needs a better clasp tbh. No idea how large companies selling $1000+ watches with dogsh*t bracelets and clasps.
Ask Grand Seiko. They have mastered the art of Japanese Shitbraclet.
I was about to say look at grand seiko till the person above me stole the march 😂.
Try a grand more recent grand Seiko on, the quality of the bracelet is insane, it’s just the lack of on the fly adjustment that ruins it, no biggie for me though
@@Rodolfoguerra12 went to their flagship boutique in Manhattan and while yes the dial, the hands and the case is impressive, I found some movement finishing and THE bracelet is really lackluster, well, grand seikos really meant to be worn on strap either way... Unless they're designing bracelet that much more unique and coherent with their design, I think they should've stay in Longines price range instead of going upmarket against Credor, Omega and Rolex.
@@watchnerds I own the GMT Quartz and the quality is amazing, even the bracelet at least for me. Also own Omega, Rolex, Tudor, I love them all equally for different reasons.
Wrist check: I'm wearing the Tissot Alpine on board special edition chronograph. It is a chunky 45 mm monster that I love!
Looks similar to the one Roger Moore worn in Live and Let Die, love it
I like this a lot. I would consider getting one.
That was a nice conclusion analysing how the brands work....insightful dude...
I think the quartz two tone is a great looker. I can’t get my head around 2400.00 Canadian for a Tissot automatic with a crap clasp,bracelet.
I have an automatic PRS 516….Why make the newer model a downgrade to manual wind? Seems a very strange decision to me.. but I guess a 68hr power reserve is a compensating factor.. 🤔lovely watch though.
In-house movement is a term word that many Swiss brands throw around, while still quietly working with various manufacturers or buying off a movement manufacturer altogether, instead of themselves directly producing the movements. As long as we can see things like higher magnetic resistance, better finishing and perhaps better accuracy, off-the-shelf are totally fine even for higher priced pieces, within that $2 - 5k range. The more in-house a brand becomes, the more expensive the service costs are going to go. Don't think Tissot owners would want to pay Omega money for regular servicing.
I have an old quartz version, from around 2010-2011
Kind of hard to justify an $1800+ Tissot watch but it does looks great though.
Thank you for this review. I almost bought this watch today, I going back tomorrow to get it 😅
I would not consider this piece simply because of the mineral crystal.
I also wouldn't consider the Longines Conquest Chronograph because of its modular movement.
What I recommend is the Hamilton Jazzmaster Performer Chronograph.
It is a sapphire crystal. Check the specs on it.
I have a very unpopulsr tissot luxury powermatic 80 white dial on bracelet. I have to say the bracelet is insanely good, even compared to rolex oyster feels more solid. The step dial in person adds so much more tridimensionality and the finishing is insane.
I'll get one today. nice review ❤
Got the quartz version - love it! But would prefer the mechanical version as it’s stunning.
That's a great looking watch. Tissot are really on a roll these days. :)
My 1st proper watch is a Tissot Seastar 2000 the blue dial with blue fabric strap and I absolutely love it.
I’m seriously considering this watch as I’m looking at something smaller than the Seastar, I want a Motorsport style watch and chronograph also, it reminds me of my dads 70’s Breitling 🥰and I’m really happy with my Seastar and from what I hear the Valjoux 7753 is a much better movement than the regularly trashed powermatic 80 movement even though I’ve had no problems with it myself
Thanks for the good vid and making me spend $1000 more on my next watch 😆✌🏽
So do you consider it to be better than the longines?
I am not sure about the complaints about the price of this particular piece.. Three are no chronographs with mechanical or automatic movements under this price. Except maybe the Chinese Seagull, but I believe Baltic is selling that on the same price as the Tissot. A micro-brand. You forgot to mention that it has a nivachron balance wheel, making it magnetic resistant. And that is regulated to -5, +5 seconds. And with a 100 m of water resistance. And below 14 mm thickness, you simply cannot get better than this. I'm seriously considering buying this. My points of criticism comes from the pushers, they are not as snappy as I would've expect and the clasp is from another movie.
Told me everything about the bezel, except what I wanted to know. Is it fixed or unidirectional?
Can't believe they settled for the Mineral instead of the Sapphire crystal, for the price range I believe Sapphire crystal should be automatic for this watch especially since all my cheaper Tissot automatics are made with Sapphire 😢🤔
It is sapphire crystal. You must be thinking of a Seiko.....
@@jasongultjaeff9397At 3:26 he mentions that they using Mineral Bezel instead of the Sapphire
@@AceDayton523 yes it's a mineral bezel. Your post implies the watches face glass. Maybe just the phrasing.
@@jasongultjaeff9397 I actually thought he was originally referring to the bezel and glass face, I checked the watch details separately and saw it's Sapphire crystal for the face, For a moment I was so bummed out 🤣🤣 Thanks for the relief 🙌🔥
Compare to Hamilton Intramatic Chrono Manual, same movement with a 3rd sub dial, different looks, etc.
Harrison - welcome back! There was an imposter sitting in for you last week, as he didn't say..."as always". Glad you escaped!
Hahaha who was that guy?!! Thanks mate, appreciate it
They just did an exact looking edition of their PR516 back in the 70s, don't see any particular strategy in goind back into vintage since it's almost like this for every brand right now...
A brown leather rally strap would look great on this piece.
It's a nice watch but as the brand stands today, I can't justify spending that much on a Tissot. The seastar 1000 power80 is the limit in my opinion
I've held both, the Tissot is a very pretty watch and a great quality piece for that price however, the Longines is noticeably better.
Tissot seastar 1000 here!
Better bargain for the price than this for sure. This kind of price is way out of Tissot's league. You're up near Tudor and easily into Longines or Oris.
@@Ascendsean35 i m looking Longines hydroconquest automatic at this price! Also, average people see a very expensive Tissot and a Longines looks much better on the wrist or a entry model Tudor, you re right!
Tissot is releasing banger after banger since the PRX
Well, that mineral bezel is getting banged up for sure.
Its Saphire @@kresimirpleic
3 quartz version is also here ;)
Nice review
I like this one. Quartz would have been okay, but I think the sub-dials are in the wrong position. It just looks weird. I like my Tissot PRX with glacier blue dial but today I'm wearing my Rolex GMT Pepsi.
I was matched up to everything you said.... Then you said you had a Rollie on the wrist!. I love my prx blue too
I suspect Tissot aren't really trying to eat from Longines, I think everyone is heading towards higher value/prices (as you said just after I started typing this)
I think the "game" they are playing is marking up the unit the first quarter or 2 of the year only to slash prices to a more affordable price the holiday season. I expect to see these hover around the $1200-$1250 price range by October of this year. As has been happening with there higher ticket items year over year. Where in $1200 for this would make a sweet pick up. They did the same thing with the sideral. Paid $1095 when first came out..... hovering at $695 now. Both are very toolish in nature.
Nice watch. Great vid...as always 😉👌
Thanks mate haha!
Crazy expensive. Shame that the quartz version is slightly different, cause would be a pretty good deal
nkuwan You are so well-informed about luxury watches. You've obviously done your due diligence and the comparison to the US is very informative...because of course, I live in New York. thank you very much
Would still rather have the longines......
This watch is dead gorgeous !!!
What about the lume ?
@ChisholmHunterOfficial. Hey great video mate! Could you please compare it with the TISSOT PRX CHRONOGRAPH ? The cost is even similar.
That would be a good video!! Let me see what I can do 🙌🙌 thanks mate
Omega Speedmaster professional Tokyo 2020 limited edition - black and yellow gold
I love this Tissot ❤
Lol, Rolex churning out 1.1 million watches has mass produced movements. Tissot is using an in house movement, ETA is from the same group. Longines is determined to squish Tudor. Longines has better heritage, and produced it's own designs, unlike the Tudor homage brand, dedicated to cheaper chunky vintage Rolex.
Alright Mr. Haaselways I subscribed, jeesh!
Elle est très belle, j'aime beaucoup aussi le bracelet. J'ai peurque 38 mm de diamètre pour un poignet d'un peu plus 19cm que cela fasse petit.
8:01 I hope it's a flyback, because you flybacked it Mr. Haaselways.
I love how people are impressed by it being a chronograph and how cheap it is in the year of 2024...
Even sub 200 quid ali express watches offer on the fly micro adjust clasps. The pressed flip lock style just isnt acceptable at this price point any more. Also on a personal note i can never bond with a watch with a matt black/grey dial. They dont have enough visual interest and i eventually get bored. The longines with its sunburst dial looks like a much more expensive and interesting product
Casio Gshock Mudman 9000. All the best!
Anyone knows the weight?
Hamilton Expedition, all day almost every day!
I’ll subscribe to your channel when you review the Breitling Galactic 41 with big date window and black dial. That is my grail which I have taken all around the world. I prefer mines over the Patek Naultilus since it has a rotating bezel too. Thanks Chisholm
Tissot should be priced to be a nice "one and done" watch for the average person who wants to spend 400-600. Anything much above that price doesn't make sense to me. Seriously doubt these models will hold their value long term either
Love that there is no date window.
Honestly I don’t mind a bit of progressive cost change over a few decades, so long as the quality and brand identity is maintained or even improved. At that point the increased cost to produce is earned through hard work and dedication to the supporters that got them there. Now if Tudors all hit 10k+ by 2030 we’re in a for a messed up watch market and a ton more Seikos are gonna be sold.
Wait 3 months and you will get this piece with a sizeable discount.
got already 15% discount 1675euros
Bought the quartz version for a great price. If you’re after the look and kinda broke it’s a looker😮
Well executed and keeping it under 2k$
L2L on this`?
49mm lug-to-lug
@@ChisholmHunterOfficial Wow, wont fit most people then
TISSOT watch is very cheaper, but good quality
Mido ocean star 200C
The problem with this watches the bracelet in clasp with a little bit more work this could’ve been an incredible watch
my vote goes to tissot
pretty watch
Hola! Cual te comprarías. ?? Prx crono o pr516?
Gran vídeo. Saludos desde TENERIFE
What's wrong with having an ETA movement, especially at this price point 🤷🏻♂️
Swatch own ETA so technically in house
Tissot brand will(probably) never produce an in-house movement cause the don’t wont to compete with other brand in swatch group that are positioned higher in hierarchy such as Omega and Glashutte Original who are doing that job.
Even Longines isn’t producing their own movements but rather having their movements being produced from ETA exclusively just for them and those movements are slightly better modified than movements found in lover range of Swatch family.
I like the watch except the hands. Look short and clunky to me. Really nice watch for the price tho.
Longines movements technically are not in house either.
So now tissot is like a "pagani design" from switzerland. An expesive homage brand 😂
Scusa se scrivo in italiano ma non conosco l'inglese ho visto il Video con il traduttore.
Video scritto molto bene.
Sei bravo perché dici le cose in maniera esatta.
A me non e piaciuto il logo del orologio. La scritta Tissot potevano farla con il logo Tissot degli anni 70 avrebbe avuto un fascino più indovinato all originale .
I contatori cronografici di forma rotonda sono belli, ma negli anni 70 erano di forma quadrata
Non è un orologio che se lo guardi da lontano lo riconosci subito....la forma la puoi confondere con un orologio di qualsiasi casa.
Il modello Tissot al quarzo ha un fondello chiuso con un bel disegno in acciaio.
Il fondello trasparente in vetro di questo modello ci permette di guardare un calibro industriale.
Il prezzo del orologio nuovo per me è un No.
È molto furbo chi lo compra usato in buone condizioni.
Il valore dell orologio sarà più economico e giusto per questo modello.
Non è un orologio da collezione ma per una raccolta il mio personale punto di vista.
Grazie per la pazienza per leggere il mio lungo commento
First of all tissot had 2000 eur models before not just last 3 year or so,prs 516 automatic last two generations are in that price range and they are.great watches,but all of watch you tubers are ignoring them because of 45 mm size,and also longines is using eta movements, they are just modefied for them,and so is this one for tissot,please do some researche and be objective
Should change the logo on the dial and remove the 1853.
Disposable sideral here 😂😂
Does not compare to the Longines
This just needs to be auto. Better clasp too.
I subscribe to your channel through this video but didn’t likenthe video because you just ignored the quartz in same watch!
Handled it irl, need better bracelet and clasp ans they need to shave the midcase thinner by 1mm, especially this being manual wind... better movement finishing... then they can charge that price smh
Their best watch sucks its almost 2 grand though getting into price range for bette watches
Shame the main hands look a bit 💩otherwise quite nice.
This Tissot is the homage on the Longines, which is in turn homage on ZENITH, which is homage on Daytona 🤣
Zenith is homage on daytona? Pls get your facts checked
@sarthaksharma5790 , man, I have nothing against Zenith. Moreover, I like it, but look at the Chronomaster Sport Yoshida editions. For instance, the rainbow one. That is a pure copy of the Daytona
No, no, no, they are all homages of the Omega Speedmaster
That's a pretty simplistic take. At that rate, they are all homages to the Speedmaster. While they may share some characteristics, all the watches you've mentioned bring different things to the table.
@theaussiewhinger , if we look at the Speedy and Daytona now, they have totally different philosophies, whereas it's clear that Zenith did try to imitate the Daytona style. I mean, just look at the same kind of bracelet, the outer massive tachymeter scale, applied markers, absolutely identical style of hands. Speedy doesn't have any of these