What Happens When You Put A Drone In a Vacuum? Can It Still Fly?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9 тис.

  • @EbikeSchool
    @EbikeSchool 8 років тому +2083

    The physics concepts here are pretty simple, but it's still cool to see something that we should already know theoretically being demonstrated physically. Thanks for the video!

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  8 років тому +20

      +EbikeSchool.com thanks for watching !

    • @lanhod
      @lanhod 8 років тому +10

      EbikeSchool.com yes. and idk why ppl commenting negatively to this vdo

    • @kakashi99908
      @kakashi99908 8 років тому +2

      stupid cultist

    • @OGYouTubeEnjoyer
      @OGYouTubeEnjoyer 7 років тому +1

      What like riding a bike?

    • @OGYouTubeEnjoyer
      @OGYouTubeEnjoyer 7 років тому +2

      Yeah youre a child I can see that
      *pats head

  • @thebigmack5035
    @thebigmack5035 8 років тому +729

    so this is why helicopters can't fly up to really high mountain heights because the air is to thin?

    • @gorgeous2135
      @gorgeous2135 8 років тому +126

      Mack Andreou exactly

    • @Nemozoli
      @Nemozoli 8 років тому +37

      Yes, and what is worse for helicopters, with height also the oxygen content is getting rather low for conventional internal combustion engines. Jet engines can take more height because of the speed ramming a lot of (albeit thin) air into the intake. There are of course helicopters built with jet engines, they can fly higher, but then they encounter the thin air phenomenon and the rotors don't provide enough lift.

    • @davesstuff1599
      @davesstuff1599 8 років тому

      Nemozoli Jet engines burn jet fuel, no oxygen needed. A helicopter using a combustion engine has to adjust for thin oxygen when going higher than usual, also air pressure drops quicker the higher you go

    • @eggplantparrot
      @eggplantparrot 8 років тому +46

      turbine engines do need oxygen...

    • @FistDaMonkey
      @FistDaMonkey 8 років тому +20

      David's Favorite Videos Jet fuel (kerosene) can't burn without oxygen just like any other hydrocarbon fuel.

  • @michaelc.4321
    @michaelc.4321 8 років тому +299

    I'm pretty sure every person on this planet knew the answer

    • @rune.theocracy
      @rune.theocracy 8 років тому +1

      Random stuff with Michael yes I've seen you before, if you know that aerodynamics work with gases or air then you know an aerodynamic machine doesn't work in a vacuum.

    • @matthewhill4176
      @matthewhill4176 8 років тому +2

      apparently not lol

    • @Marconel100
      @Marconel100 8 років тому +1

      You'll be surprised how many people don't know why helicopters can't fly is space XD
      This planet is full of idiots.

    • @marcaslam3323
      @marcaslam3323 8 років тому +19

      not flat-earthers, oh but they won't, even after watching this video

    • @orlogskapten5617
      @orlogskapten5617 8 років тому +4

      Random stuff with Michael You'd be surprised...

  • @artan.
    @artan. 3 роки тому +28

    "And it did, because physics works"
    This cracked me up

  • @ericlovelace6502
    @ericlovelace6502 8 років тому +359

    Is this why helicopters can't fly to the moon?

    • @FloppydriveMaestro
      @FloppydriveMaestro 8 років тому +59

      It is 1 of a list of many many reasons as to why helicopters can't fly to the moon.

    • @johnklumpp7901
      @johnklumpp7901 8 років тому +6

      -- eric lovelace, yes because
      (1) It would go out of control with a dead pilot.
      (2) It would cease to rise when the motor dies.
      (3) It would be unable to dodge all the satellites when its out of control, with a dead pilot.
      (4) The US Air Force would shoot it down when no one answers a radio challenge. Those pilots just love to do that.
      www.flatwoodsmonster.com/feschinopaintingblog.jpg
      (Shooting down a lot of stuff since Summer, 1952 - USAF, Navy Aviation, and Marine Corps Aviation!)
      This a suitable list, Captaintoast12321?

    • @itszurox
      @itszurox 8 років тому +9

      eric lovelace they can't fly to the moon because they will run out of gas before they get there.... dumbass

    • @zebentley12
      @zebentley12 8 років тому +24

      Zurox You obviously didn't get the joke, dumbass

    • @Marconel100
      @Marconel100 8 років тому

      No.

  • @BFFsEngineer
    @BFFsEngineer 8 років тому +242

    just clicked this to read the comments

    • @Vajrabrother
      @Vajrabrother 6 років тому +3

      Yeah, reading comments , jists or takes is sometimes even more interesting than watching the information or thesis presented !!
      The emotional fluctuations sometimes seem to be more powerful than rocket propellants or logic , physics or "science" .....(or humans seemingly love to fight or squabble it out) !
      I sometimes wonder what grades some humans had in physics/science ! (chemistry) ? ....purported school !

    • @ethangeer4438
      @ethangeer4438 6 років тому +4

      I'm losing faith in humanity by reading the comments😫

    • @jimh6189
      @jimh6189 6 років тому +1

      Same here! I'm like "duh, of course it can't fly. So who could possibly not understand that?" But then my wife comes up and says it should be able to fly. And she has a college degree. Go figure. So I guess this video was necessary afterall. BTW: Never watched the video and never will. But do enjoy even the stupid comments : ). But really, without the background science most people would not understand. It's just funny that they think that maybe because it's a drone, maybe it can???

    • @hunormagyar1843
      @hunormagyar1843 6 років тому

      Same. I already know the result; there's no air so the drone can't fly.
      I'm just curious how people react 😂

  • @stiimuli
    @stiimuli 7 років тому +265

    The whole video I was wracking my brain trying to figure out how you were going to get a balloon to release inside the box. After seeing the simplicity of the magnet solution I feel like an idiot =(

    • @Vajrabrother
      @Vajrabrother 6 років тому +3

      Ohhhhh.....much effort was put into this video ....(but seemingly not enough)!
      It intrigued me as well...but there seem to be quite inventive guys (or gals) out there !!
      Question is , how he can set off a minute fire works rocket in there "remote controlled".... or with a wire detonator !!??
      Of course there is way ..... with a rubber seal that fits two wires !!

    • @Vajrabrother
      @Vajrabrother 6 років тому +1

      Oh, yeah and but but cool the way he did it !!

    • @jamesp1500
      @jamesp1500 6 років тому +1

      Vajrabrother, i like the way you think. Wire up a taser to a magnetic switch. Like the kind they use for door alarm sensors. Hopefully the battery would stand up to the vacuum.

    • @Vajrabrother
      @Vajrabrother 6 років тому +1

      Pujol (heheheheh) any test could be made .... and make sure the rocket is suspended in midair , so it does not "push off the walls" !
      Possibly humans also think that rockets only pushed of the ground .....
      and used all that boost to get "way up high" !!??
      How bizarre !!
      (or off course Nasa would never suspend a rocket in midair to prove to humans , that a rocket does not push off the ground !!)... which it even does "just at the beginning"!
      Heehehehehehe...LOL ...so strange what some humans think !!

    • @wakeuppeople1334
      @wakeuppeople1334 6 років тому

      Wee already know your a idiot dont need explain

  • @CNinjaa
    @CNinjaa 4 роки тому +72

    That drone is made my Eachine. They're $20-$30 and tons of fun. They don't tolerate wind well, but inside and low wind they're great!

  • @ediciusbizaar4977
    @ediciusbizaar4977 6 років тому +756

    Does anyone really think a drone could fly without air?

    • @vfx_aiko
      @vfx_aiko 6 років тому +12

      Never knew

    • @MilesPrower1992
      @MilesPrower1992 6 років тому +75

      It can't but it's cool to see

    • @dunik88
      @dunik88 6 років тому +1

      Hahah

    • @rickyguevara2330
      @rickyguevara2330 6 років тому +23

      I'm sure there are quite a few younger people in his audience.

    • @sheetalpradhan1410
      @sheetalpradhan1410 6 років тому +3

      no it will not even move the motion will be due to velocity of projection n critical velocity.not by the rotation of blades.its moving their because its partial vacuum n not total vacuum.

  • @TacNaynMC
    @TacNaynMC 8 років тому +343

    Did Amazon deliver the drone to you with a drone?

    • @Chrassi
      @Chrassi 8 років тому +33

      IHadNoIdeaThatGoogleAllowedYouToChangeYourNameIntoSomethingSoRidiculouslyLongAndStupidLikeIDidHere your Name, i like it!

    • @EikSike
      @EikSike 7 років тому

      IHadNoIdeaThatGoogleAllowedYouToChangeYourNameIntoSomethingSoRidiculouslyLongAndStupidLikeIDidHereWowIHaveBadHumor

    • @elisusisgay
      @elisusisgay 7 років тому

      IHadNoIdeaThatGoogleAllowedYouToChangeYourNameIntoSomethingSoRidiculouslyLongAndStupidLikeIDidHere IHadNoIdeaThatGoogleAllowedYouToChangeYourNameIntoSomethingSoRidiculouslyLongAndStupidLikeIDidHereIHadNoIdeaThatGoogleAllowedYouToChangeYourNameIntoSomethingSoRidiculouslyLongAndStupidLikeIDidHere

    • @Yigituckelbeckz
      @Yigituckelbeckz 7 років тому

      IHadNoIdeaThatGoogleAllowedYouToChangeYourNameIntoSomethingSoRidiculouslyLongAndStupidLikeIDidHere hi

    • @curiosgaming8408
      @curiosgaming8408 7 років тому

      IHadNoIdeaThatGoogleAllowedYouToChangeYourNameIntoSomethingSoRidiculouslyLongAndStupidLikeIDidHere nice name

  • @ryanp7168
    @ryanp7168 8 років тому +1406

    A basic understanding of how a drone or any flying machine works let's you know that it wouldn't fly without even watching this video. Makes me think that this channel didn't have any ideas for a video this week or whenever they make them

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  8 років тому +140

      +Ryan P I also know what will happen I put when I put sodium in water/when I put water in a vacuum/when I use a giant magnifying glass to melt metal etc. It's one thing to predict/know what will happen, it's another thing to live it. What fun is life if you just "know" what will happen but never experience it?

    • @ryanp7168
      @ryanp7168 8 років тому +30

      Hydraulic Press Action the difference is that other people may not know something interesting happens when you put sodium in water. And that, along with melting things can result in something visually appealing and worth filming. Nothing about a drone being unable to fly without air is intersting to me. I'm not attacking you or your channel, and it's fine if you were short on ideas when making this. I just thought you would make more interesting videos that this. It's the equivalent of asking how quickly a sailboat van travel without wind, or if a car will start without gas. Nothing personal.

    • @ryanp7168
      @ryanp7168 8 років тому +16

      ccman32 if this channel wants to grow, I'd hope they'd take a comment like mine and say "ya know maybe I should set the bar a little higher instead of making a video saying 'hey, watch this drone NOT WORK'" Feedback that isn't positive is still feedback and I'm not making personal attacks it's constructive criticism. People on UA-cam love to get butthurt in the comments section over very tame comments. Let's not make this one of those times.

    • @deeyannie2339
      @deeyannie2339 8 років тому +35

      Ryan P
      What about younger viewers who didn't know what would happen?
      This video was likely both entertaining and informative to those who genuinely have no idea how drones work.
      Maybe it wasn't your cup of tea, but to assume your advice is helpful solely based off your personal expectations and interpretation of what "entertainment" should be is a little self centered, don't you think?

    • @ryanp7168
      @ryanp7168 8 років тому +5

      dee yannie I never once said my feedback is the only feedback that matters. And I'd purport that younger viewers would also like videos that are more visually impressive or fun than watching a drone that can't fly.

  • @theanonymousseeker3952
    @theanonymousseeker3952 5 років тому +28

    A drone in a vacuum chamber is called a quad-double figit spinner because it cannot fly but the propellers still spin.

    • @leekelantan618
      @leekelantan618 3 роки тому

      For modern humans you must see rockets. Drones are not for vacuum areas. Astronauts do not use drones. Astronauts use rockets. Rockets are used to fly in space. Rockets and drones are different.... Do you see the difference between a rocket and a drone? Look at the rocket there is a bright light. See drone no light. Rockets are perfect for flying in space. Drones do not fit. Rockets for space technology. The drone video you show can be used to show evidence if you go back to ancient times
      Find videos of people experimenting with the concept of rockets in a vacuum. Get information about rockets. Watch a video on the rocket concept. Don't watch videos for drone concepts. Many rocket concept experiments. Tribes believe the earth is flat, does the video use the rocket concept method?

    • @leekelantan618
      @leekelantan618 3 роки тому

      @19 December 19
      Please watch this video to see the earth marked with a red line to measure the distance and estimate the number of buildings that can be built.
      How many tall buildings can be built between the red line to the next red line? How tall is the tallest building that humans have built?
      How many kilometers from the red line to the next red line?
      ua-cam.com/video/-9taJxzb2ek/v-deo.html

    • @ravel1
      @ravel1 3 роки тому +1

      @19 December 19 uhh yeah it can

    • @ravel1
      @ravel1 3 роки тому +2

      @19 December 19 sure I will. This is the most common example but its very easy to do so lets use this.
      Imagine you are on a skateboard and have a bowling ball, when u throw the ball in a direction you will move in the opposite direction. Why is this ?
      Isaac Newton's third law of motion!
      "Every action produces an equal and opposite reaction."
      Meaning if a force is applied in 1 direction the exact amount of force is applied in the opposite direction.
      So if we use this information in our experiment, when we apply lets say 5N of force to throw the ball, a force of 5N is applied to us moving us backwards.
      This is the principle of rockets, its quite simple.
      When a rocket shoots fuel out one end, this propels the rocket forward - no air is required.

    • @anti-ethniccleansing465
      @anti-ethniccleansing465 3 роки тому

      @19 December 19
      Lol, read the channel producer’s pinned post. You’re embarrassing yourself here.

  • @videoloops1
    @videoloops1 7 років тому +75

    Using magnets for holding the air in the balloon was genius!! I would have used a larger vacuum chamber and released the balloon with my hands while wearing a spacesuit

    • @nineeleven9455
      @nineeleven9455 7 років тому +1

      You and your space suit would have exploded. That’s why you will never see an astronot wear a space suit in a vacuum chamber. This guy should have used a huge vacuum chamber. The balloon thrust off the side of the chamber, and the chamber quickly gained air density from the balloon, so the air from the balloon had air density to thrust against.
      [ NASA space suits are a hoax:
      plus.google.com/116502556172406985386/posts/eFbaLdVrn8G ]

    • @charleighwaggoner2399
      @charleighwaggoner2399 7 років тому +1

      Nine Eleven rockets can't fly in something that isn't really there

    • @ashtea23
      @ashtea23 7 років тому +1

      videoloops1
      He should of kept the pump on

    • @azurhadzic2908
      @azurhadzic2908 7 років тому +2

      +Charleigh Waggoner yes they can, it's called Newton's third law

    • @fpvangel4495
      @fpvangel4495 Місяць тому

      @@azurhadzic2908 They have nothing to push against, its sci-fi, all that happened here was a balloon emptied itself and fell to the bottom like the drone.

  • @frankgonzalez24
    @frankgonzalez24 6 років тому +173

    basically, a drone won't fly in a vacuum for the same reason a fly won't fly in a vacuum. No air for the blades or wings for them to push down on.

    • @Alex-Walker
      @Alex-Walker 6 років тому +84

      A fly won't fly in a vacuum because it'd be dead.

    • @3Dusers
      @3Dusers 6 років тому +5

      @@Alex-Walker top kek

    • @harlem_s
      @harlem_s 6 років тому

      bernoulli law is still usefull

    • @cosmicbro1973
      @cosmicbro1973 6 років тому +8

      Alexander Walker No they dont die, there is actually a video look it up.

    • @blackconfucius4974
      @blackconfucius4974 6 років тому

      Serendine Madaura nope

  • @markmuch1443
    @markmuch1443 8 років тому +636

    Reported for drone abuse

  • @DanielRobboSon
    @DanielRobboSon 6 років тому +88

    What I really want to see is someone fly a drone in zero gravity, but have air.

    • @lebanemcarl68
      @lebanemcarl68 6 років тому +5

      That would be awesome

    • @derrickmoses1507
      @derrickmoses1507 6 років тому +4

      DanielRobboSon that would be hard to control think of the gyros...

    • @lebanemcarl68
      @lebanemcarl68 6 років тому +22

      @@derrickmoses1507 yeah it would probably just fly "up" really fast and hit the ceiling.

    • @Anonymous-rx8gp
      @Anonymous-rx8gp 6 років тому +5

      It would be a mess.
      Air friction would be the only force acting in opposite, it will take hella a lot of time to stop.
      But wait the air wouldn't necessarily give friction, the only friction would be the Contact Force. Coz the air isn't bound by gravity, so it will just start motion.
      I gotta find out.
      JUICY

    • @MilesPrower1992
      @MilesPrower1992 6 років тому +3

      If it had reversible thrust it would be easy

  • @katiemarshall1485
    @katiemarshall1485 8 років тому +280

    New trend will be vacuum chamber challenge

    • @kjkent.3738
      @kjkent.3738 8 років тому +7

      Katie Marshall sounds like a fun time

    • @ljuc
      @ljuc 8 років тому +8

      What's the actual challenge? Sticking your own head in it?

    • @janrdoh
      @janrdoh 8 років тому +7

      South Africa's President has a vacuum in his head. It causes a deformation at the back of the skull and the eyes bulge a little. It also causes him to say stupid things.

    • @mauriciolara7882
      @mauriciolara7882 8 років тому +3

      Katie Marshall Finally, I can get sucked.

    • @productivitygod7887
      @productivitygod7887 8 років тому +1

      it will be like ur in space without an spacesuit so have fun!

  • @wompagompa
    @wompagompa 8 років тому +113

    I know what you do next: What happens if you put youreself in the vacum.

    • @FavoriteBananaTWO
      @FavoriteBananaTWO 8 років тому +3

      i hope he does it so he can stop posting these videos

    • @FavoriteBananaTWO
      @FavoriteBananaTWO 8 років тому +5

      tier six my nigga

    • @GrumpSkull
      @GrumpSkull 8 років тому +1

      Probably make your eyes pop out like ping pong balls. Then you will see!

    • @DimmVargr
      @DimmVargr 8 років тому

      +GrumpSkull Actually, no. Eyes are mostly made of water.

    • @ethanboss3348
      @ethanboss3348 8 років тому

      Wompa Gompa The water in his body would boil. :)

  • @da8thgamer577
    @da8thgamer577 8 років тому +30

    I like how you present the stuff and what's actually happening and why. Keep it up!

  • @jacksuquett1191
    @jacksuquett1191 3 роки тому +28

    Couple of quick points I would like to make. When using the balloon you're adding air to the environment creating a atmosphere. Second, using that box provides a bottom for the balloon to push off of...

    • @philipellis4530
      @philipellis4530 3 роки тому +7

      Exactly, try that balloon trick in the Ohio vacuum chamber, better still put an a guy in there with a spacesuit on without umbilical cords, not one clip available on the net.

    • @delayedcreator4783
      @delayedcreator4783 Рік тому +1

      what are you trying to say

    • @SF2PersianKing
      @SF2PersianKing Рік тому +3

      exactly. the wall behind the balloon. this proves zero...nothing at all.

    • @andremackinnon9271
      @andremackinnon9271 10 місяців тому +1

      Yes the air pressure in the balloon wanting to escape creates the rush of air ( atmosphere) and causing it to be applied to a solid object, and is used to propel it through the vacuum.

  • @muskokamike127
    @muskokamike127 8 років тому +28

    Next up:
    Let's see if a dog can breathe underwater lol

  • @AKSnowLeopard
    @AKSnowLeopard 8 років тому +704

    who clicked on this just to read the comments?

    • @rsoul7282
      @rsoul7282 8 років тому +18

      E. Duncan me. My personal favourite so far is a guy saying space does not exist, is a firmament of water between here and heaven. Who encourages these people to come up with this shit?

    • @SDF5150
      @SDF5150 8 років тому

      Lol

    • @redengineer4320
      @redengineer4320 8 років тому +6

      i come here in case i need a reminder that i should never have faith in humanity.

    • @earthclad6833
      @earthclad6833 7 років тому

      me

    • @Gameout50
      @Gameout50 7 років тому +8

      came to see if anyone actually thought it would fly

  • @neilkadu8745
    @neilkadu8745 7 років тому +277

    make a video, can you swim without water.

  • @veracity5977
    @veracity5977 3 роки тому +40

    Here after NASA said they were gonna helicopter the rover off Mars

    • @lukemcewan3305
      @lukemcewan3305 3 роки тому +4

      My dude I've been thinking the same thing.

    • @sromey10
      @sromey10 3 роки тому +2

      NASA claims avg atmospheric pressure is 740pa or about .73% that of Earth's. Or about .11 psi. They must be pretty sure it will fly sense they spent all that money to get it there hopefully they didn't for get air density is a factor in air flight. Otherwise we are going to watch a multi million dollar drone skidder around on Mars.

    • @k10-s7q
      @k10-s7q 3 роки тому +1

      Gonna require massive energy tho. It can even be impossible for current technology

    • @stuartgray5877
      @stuartgray5877 3 роки тому

      @@k10-s7q - "Gonna require massive energy tho."
      it will take LESS energy than lifting the same mass on earth since the gravity is less.
      The challenge is that the rotors need much higher velocity in the lower pressure than on earth.
      It would be the equivalent of a helicopter flying in earth atmosphere at 40 km.
      Hard, but not impossible if you design for that pressure.
      They tested it in a vacuum chamber to demonstrate it works.

    • @marquez4497
      @marquez4497 3 роки тому +4

      Mars isn’t a vacuum

  • @badgitsy
    @badgitsy 8 років тому +53

    Hydraulic Press action. Okay guys im gonna put a drone in a vacuum chamber.

  • @utkarshtiwari2089
    @utkarshtiwari2089 8 років тому +23

    you are going just as we want! new ideas! btw you didnt do a hydraulic press video in a while :P

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  8 років тому +6

      Thanks! I know I haven't done a press video in a while because everyone is loving my vacuum videos so much, but I do still have a lot of press ideas to do!

    • @icecreamjoe9744
      @icecreamjoe9744 8 років тому

      Hydraulic Press Action i think you could start viral vids and a trend by vacuuming stuff;) i think change your channel name to vacuum action or something and you will grow so fast!

    • @icecreamjoe9744
      @icecreamjoe9744 8 років тому +2

      Hydraulic Press Action also what happens when you put a lokai bracelet or gopro or playing cards in a vacuum chamber? Please do the lokai or cards :) pleaseeee it would mean the world to me and would be entertaining for alot of viewers!:) thanks alottt

    • @-AT-WALKER
      @-AT-WALKER 8 років тому +3

      Cody's Lab does a whole load of vacuum experiments... funnily enough he covered a similar idea not that long ago.

    • @doobs930069
      @doobs930069 8 років тому

      Codyslab doesnt own vacuum chambers, but this channel is just hoppin on the band wagon. Where's the 1000 degree knife videos?

  • @superluminous101
    @superluminous101 7 років тому +24

    Great experiment thanks, but ultimately it is flawed. Once the air comes out of the balloon your tank is no longer in the state of a vacuum. If you watch the video in slow motion the balloon remains basically in the same location, then after half the air has been released the balloon zips forward. I think you need a much bigger tank.

    • @integralogic
      @integralogic 2 роки тому +9

      Shh shh don't think just regurgitate

    • @dsmtsi
      @dsmtsi 2 роки тому +9

      100% bang on right there. For the first half second the balloon doesn't move at all until more air is released giving the rest of the air something to push on.
      The drone is more accurate of the fact that there is no way for perpulaion to work in space.

    • @handicrap
      @handicrap 2 роки тому

      @@dsmtsi air created in a vacuum like from Hyrogen burn WILL accelerate un a vacuum and if you don't think so; then you be dumb brah.

    • @maddy123sir
      @maddy123sir 2 роки тому +4

      the air coming out of the balloon is pushing on the chamber walls, so it is pushing away from an external medium

    • @handicrap
      @handicrap 2 роки тому

      @@maddy123sir after that happens, it does multiple tumbles on it's own, don't be dense.

  • @MilesPrower1992
    @MilesPrower1992 6 років тому +68

    The moon is flat, and we have never been to the Earth!

  • @grounded7362
    @grounded7362 7 років тому +8

    The reason your balloon flew a little is because the atmosphere in the balloon changed the pressure in the box and it initially pushed off the box.
    Why not see how much flight you get from the balloon with full pressure in the box compared to full vacuum.

  • @bigworm1551
    @bigworm1551 8 років тому +32

    Will a vacuum work in a vacuum chamber that's the real question

    • @leekelantan618
      @leekelantan618 3 роки тому

      For modern humans you must see rockets. Drones are not for vacuum areas. Astronauts do not use drones. Astronauts use rockets. Rockets are used to fly in space. Rockets and drones are different.... Do you see the difference between a rocket and a drone? Look at the rocket there is a bright light. See drone no light. Rockets are perfect for flying in space. Drones do not fit. Rockets for space technology. The drone video you show can be used to show evidence if you go back to ancient times
      Find videos of people experimenting with the concept of rockets in a vacuum. Get information about rockets. Watch a video on the rocket concept. Don't watch videos for drone concepts. Many rocket concept experiments. Tribes believe the earth is flat, does the video use the rocket concept method?

    • @Eatinbritches
      @Eatinbritches 3 роки тому

      Of course it won't a vacuum uses air pressure to work. No air, no pressure, no vacuum.

    • @ockertoustesizem1234
      @ockertoustesizem1234 3 роки тому +1

      will a shadow work in darkness that's the real question

  • @michael-lynn
    @michael-lynn 7 років тому +13

    The balloon had the inner walls of your chamber as a medium for the released air to project it, just as a rocket does the ground until it lifts off and uses the atmosphere... I trust your method like I trust a snake.

  • @Goood-dn2ux
    @Goood-dn2ux 6 років тому +1

    You could argue that the air from this balloon was impacting against the surface of the box and so creating a thrust? Great demonstration though.

    • @vladimirmartinez4546
      @vladimirmartinez4546 4 роки тому

      It's moving because the ball is throwing air so it has to move in the opposite direction

  • @annam4750
    @annam4750 8 років тому +99

    What would happen if you put dry ice in a vacuum chamber?

    • @j2o2e8y
      @j2o2e8y 8 років тому +27

      It sublimates faster than normal, would be my guess.

    • @doublebubleguy12
      @doublebubleguy12 8 років тому +15

      It would be hard to create a vacuum since it would keep adding co2 into the atmosphere. It actually would be similar to mars atmosphere though, besides the -100 Centigrade temps of course:p

    • @attack125
      @attack125 8 років тому

      what gives you the idea it's not -100 c on mars? at some places the air is so thin it's like being in the vacuum of space on the surface of mars. i bet it's even colder then solid co2

    • @ancientconstruct6754
      @ancientconstruct6754 8 років тому +2

      @ James Denney -- Randall Munroe has an answer for you: what-if.xkcd.com/30/

    • @borisb1831
      @borisb1831 8 років тому +5

      Ugh why are people so dumb. The hottest molecules which have sublimated and removed by creating the vacuum would make the dry ice even colder which would slow down the sublimation process. Sounds fucking boring

  • @eyalgoffer1982
    @eyalgoffer1982 8 років тому +106

    I want to see how the drone fly in an EXTREMELY dense atmosphere

    • @shabadabba
      @shabadabba 7 років тому +8

      it would probably get crushed

    • @jordanlynch8687
      @jordanlynch8687 7 років тому

      אייל ג really good cause lots of bite

    • @shabadabba
      @shabadabba 7 років тому

      Jordan Lynch what?

    • @95ellington
      @95ellington 7 років тому +10

      Think of it this way, fluids. which can be gas or liquid. Gas, as in air, think airplanes. liquid, as in water, think submarines.

    • @inn0version727
      @inn0version727 7 років тому

      this comment section is an EXTREMELY dense atmosphere אייל ג

  • @anthonyhyte9198
    @anthonyhyte9198 6 років тому +7

    In this case, the vacuum didn't represent space, so not only was the balloons motion aided by the air pushing on the glass and remaining air, but also, as the balloon shrank, a negative pressure was created and that negative pressure actually pulled the balloon forward, so all this experiment proves is that propellers don't work without enough air to create lift.

  • @brocklesnar86
    @brocklesnar86 6 років тому +1

    People see a drone, i see a businessman

  • @TeslaNick2
    @TeslaNick2 8 років тому +30

    How did your balloon not expand and then explode when you pulled the vacuum ? I call bullshit on this basis.

    • @ForwardBias
      @ForwardBias 8 років тому +15

      It did expand....

    • @rune.theocracy
      @rune.theocracy 8 років тому

      Tesla Nick I don't know honestly, I guess the rubber effectively blocks the low pressure and high pressure areas? I DON'T KNOW

    • @FloppydriveMaestro
      @FloppydriveMaestro 8 років тому +5

      It did expand. Did you even watch the video? Its near impossible to pull a true vacuum. Especially with a home made set up like that.

    • @katzen3314
      @katzen3314 8 років тому +5

      Even if there was a complete vacuum, it still wouldn't have to explode.

    • @johnklumpp7901
      @johnklumpp7901 8 років тому +1

      -- Tesla Nick, with only a little air (pressure) inside it there's no chance of an explosion. Say that it had only a fraction of one PSI.
      The opposite of an inflated bladder under water where one employs extremely high pressure.

  • @nioh9477
    @nioh9477 7 років тому +31

    2:54 more impressed of How he tought of that solution to open the balloon with magnets

    • @r4ze549
      @r4ze549 7 років тому +2

      Bart the Plug yh

  • @hawkteflon
    @hawkteflon 8 років тому +286

    It's suffocating! Let it out!

    • @cruz1008
      @cruz1008 7 років тому +47

      hawkteflon Vegans these days

  • @reyhandaffa9843
    @reyhandaffa9843 6 років тому +90

    the dislikes, must be flat earth poeple

    • @jsmith3867
      @jsmith3867 6 років тому

      @do hoop No doubt

    • @dan00420
      @dan00420 6 років тому +3

      Why? It perfectly demonstrates why a combustion engine wouldn't work in "space."

    • @BetterCallThall
      @BetterCallThall 6 років тому +4

      @@jsmith3867
      If you're talking about a rocket, then you don't know how a rocket works.
      Propellors pull matter through a system to create movement.
      A rocket throws matter to create movement.
      The fuel itself IS oxygen. Hence its functioning even in a vacuum. A jet engine would NOT work in space because the propellant has to move through an intake. Rockets have no intake.
      Think of it like this:
      A musket will not fire in space. The reaction I not self contained. A modern rifle, however, would. Its fuel and oxidizer are self contained and sealed.

    • @Tjrissi96
      @Tjrissi96 6 років тому +1

      @@BetterCallThall Don't waist your time. These troglodytes are retarded.

    • @bryanfrombuffalo7685
      @bryanfrombuffalo7685 6 років тому +2

      Daniel Harbeson he thinks a balloon is the same as a 🚀..combustion doesnt work in space 100pct. flat earth has nothing to do with it...

  • @averyalexander2303
    @averyalexander2303 8 років тому +27

    Try putting maybe 5-10 PSI of compressed air in the chamber and see if it flies better from denser air.

    • @theenigma7290
      @theenigma7290 8 років тому +1

      14 PSI is normal atmospheric pressure

    • @averyalexander2303
      @averyalexander2303 8 років тому +1

      The Enigma You are correct. I should have specified that I meant PSIG, not PSIA. Thank you for the comment.

    • @TheOpticTomahawk
      @TheOpticTomahawk 8 років тому

      The Tool Guy it doesn't depend at all where you're at. atmospheric pressure is and will always be 14.7 psi. if the pressure where you live is 14.3 psi then you live somewhere with less than atmospheric pressure.

    • @kurjahko
      @kurjahko 8 років тому +1

      TheOpticTomahawk exact pressure depends on your altitude and even on the weather.

    • @PittsNoChill
      @PittsNoChill 8 років тому

      You would generate more lift being there is more oxygen to push downward at the expense of the motor working harder to push more volume. Denser air might require a finer blade for the helicopter to ease the stress on the motor but that also has many variables to include weight of the aircraft. It's like pushing water through a power sprayer in a sense compared to a garden hose.

  • @gz1162
    @gz1162 8 років тому +27

    **quadcopter**

  • @neshanwonder
    @neshanwonder 8 років тому +4

    I would have never thought of holding the balloon with a magnet YOU SMART MAN

    • @leekelantan618
      @leekelantan618 3 роки тому

      Rockets, drones, submarines.. Open the video using the rocket concept. Do you know rockets? This is a video for a drone. Astronauts use rockets. Not a drone. The person who made this video didn’t know about rockets
      Submarine technology. In the sea can breathe. Rocket technology for space. Astronauts use rockets. Not a drone. At sea can breathe sitting in a submarine. When we know the method we can live and fly into space
      Experiment
      the rocket moves in a vacuum chamber. Evidence of rockets flying in space
      Use the rocket concept. Then re -enter the video recording here. Astronauts do not use drones. Astronauts use rockets. You use drones because you don’t know rockets. You don’t know newton’s third law
      ua-cam.com/video/GxBRQXxBRic/v-deo.html

    • @neshanwonder
      @neshanwonder 3 роки тому

      @@leekelantan618 bro what that was 4 years ago

  • @DeezVideoPictures
    @DeezVideoPictures 8 місяців тому +2

    The ballon worked because it has air in it. The drone did not supply air

  • @liamvant
    @liamvant 8 років тому +58

    but the rocket flies because of it's own atmosphere doens't it?
    like if you give the quad the same amount of air underneath it , it wil fly as well

    • @utkarshtiwari2089
      @utkarshtiwari2089 8 років тому +11

      liamvant technically you have to put air above the drone for it to fly :P

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  8 років тому +2

      It depends on how you think of it. You could describe it that the rocket makes the high pressure behind it that pushes it forward. But the pressure in the chamber itself did not go up according to the pressure gauge, so the balloon was still flying at the same vacuum pressure.

    • @Liam-di7hn
      @Liam-di7hn 8 років тому

      You all realize they do not use rockets in space right? They don't work. Period. After a rocket is launched into space it only uses the acceleration it got before leaving our atmosphere (in space no air friction = no reduced speed). Then they use gravitational pulls from planetary objects, or ionic thrusters to change direction.

    • @Liam-di7hn
      @Liam-di7hn 8 років тому

      The reason they dont work is because there is no air to give mass behind the rocket. Everyone knows u put force one way it gives the opposite force the same, According to masses of the objects (air vs rocket) when air is removed from the equation the thrust generated towards the rocket is so minuscule you would need millions of tons of fuel to do anything. Thus they do not use standerd rockets in space, they use ionic thrusters. Google them.

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  8 років тому +23

      Liam Hogeterp, I really hope you are not someone that thinks we didn't go to the moon or else my comment will fall on deaf ears. I think you are confused about rockets. I just showed you that a balloon moves in a vacuum. So does a rocket. The only difference between the balloon and a rocket is the balloon used pressurized air and a rocket uses another pressurized gas (like water from H2 O2 reaction). In fact rockets fly better in space because they can produce more thrust in a vacuum. The thrust equation in general is Thrust force=m_flow*Exit_Velocity+(Presssure_throat-Pressure_outside)*Exit_Area. The lower the outside pressure is the more thrust you get because your exit gas expands more. Why don't you read from the experts themselves on this subject (NASA):spaceflightsystems.grc.nasa.gov/education/rocket/Lessons/propulsionS_act.html

  • @nessybomber1581
    @nessybomber1581 7 років тому +6

    "just gonna let it hover there"
    *Bangs around all over the place*

  • @richardcosta1565
    @richardcosta1565 7 років тому +8

    There is a flaw with the use of a balloon in the vacuum chamber. The air molecules were in the balloon and when released, the exhaust end of the balloon was pressed against the glass, thereby providing a resistance for the escape molecular air to push against which propelled the ballon away from the glass surface. There's your action and reaction.

    • @CBALLEN
      @CBALLEN 2 роки тому +1

      Exactly.

    • @cloudoftime
      @cloudoftime 2 роки тому

      Wrong. The opening of the end of the balloon was not pressed up against the glass. Also, if you slow the video down you can clearly see that the balloon flies in different directions even when not near the walls. Also, you can buy rockets yourself. Do you need to have them butted up against a flat surface to fly? No. Come on, think!

    • @hrmdeshazier6782
      @hrmdeshazier6782 Рік тому

      Thank you that's the reason it pushed offand these other comments people couldn't see that or they didn't want too

    • @Checkeroute
      @Checkeroute 3 місяці тому

      ​@@cloudoftimeJesus Christ you're dull. Can you not see that the balloon was held tight against the glass?

    • @cloudoftime
      @cloudoftime 3 місяці тому

      @@Checkeroute Did I say "the balloon" or did I say "the end of the balloon" as in the opening? There is an important distinction and it makes all the difference.
      Ironic that you're calling me dull.

  • @anthonybear5519
    @anthonybear5519 3 роки тому +2

    You are pushing air off the side of the container. How does that mimic space?

  • @Cylindricity
    @Cylindricity 8 років тому +26

    Right so here are all the problems:
    1. The reason that the quad copter is capable of flight is not a pressure differential, it is simple movement of air. Yes, there is a pressure differential, but thats just because something is moving in a fluid
    2: your balloon only works with liquid or gas rocket fuel that pressurizes itself as it is ignited. Without the pressure of the atmosphere, a solid rocket will not burn fast. For proof, check out Cody's Lab's latest video.
    3. The people who sent the rockets to space knew what would work and how it would work, if they hadn't, there is no possible way that they could successfully direct a rocket anywhere.

    • @Cylindricity
      @Cylindricity 8 років тому +4

      The third point doesn't matter as much as the first two

    • @Marconel100
      @Marconel100 8 років тому

      He gets the point across.

    • @MariusSchar
      @MariusSchar 8 років тому

      Jaden CM there are solid motors used in space, especially on smaller rockets or as kick stages. These obviously work, so they have some mechanism to work, although my physics smarts aren't good enough to make a guess as to why

    • @Cylindricity
      @Cylindricity 8 років тому

      Marius Schär it is possible to have solid boosters that pressurize themselves as they combust, the thing is, and I'm oversimplifying this, when you burn things in air there is pressure (oxygen is not necessarily necessary) but without the pressure, you cannot get a chain reaction causing repeated combustion.
      In a vacuum, when you burn things, the molecules that combust fly away/lose their heat too fast to supply enough heat to the next unburnt molecules in order to catalyze the combustion reaction.
      So if you were to take a rocket and essentially plug the bottom in order to create something that acts like an artificial atmosphere, you could get combustion. But obviously there would have to be a solid oxidizer in the mix.
      I am, however unaware of the actual applications, I just know about the theory.

    • @parkersuscavage3298
      @parkersuscavage3298 8 років тому

      Jaden CM Your first point is wrong. A wing works because of pressure differential. There's a higher pressure below the wing then there is above the wing when it is spinning. The rotor blades are just wings mounted in a circular pattern.

  • @NickWarnerMedia
    @NickWarnerMedia 7 років тому +165

    Is it just me or does this seem obvious? Why would someone expect it to fly?

    • @xAdrianHGx
      @xAdrianHGx 7 років тому +9

      NickWarnerMedia yeah i know drones uses air to push itself into the air but if there is no air drone cant push itself up... air haves same effect as water... fishes swim in water like planes and drones fly in air

    • @sadlanod
      @sadlanod 7 років тому +2

      NickWarnerMedia we expected ballon not to fly , because earth is flat . and chamber is to small for experiment , because it propels from the walls.

    • @mlwg9317
      @mlwg9317 7 років тому +5

      You realize no one can understand that gibberish right?

    • @thundermax4759
      @thundermax4759 7 років тому +8

      This is called empirical measurement instead of just filling your head with textbook knowledge. The empirical method is far more effective as a teaching tool.

    • @thundermax4759
      @thundermax4759 7 років тому +3

      It's exactly people like you that write textbooks and tell me that it's gravity that holds the earth atmosphere in place. You take that on blind faith my friend; not a proven fact, only conjecture. Spokesmen for NASA can't prove it either only surmise on what they can measure. It's the best theory that is posited and that is accepted but still based on blind faith and possible explanations. An easy out to explain things away because when you try and bring up an inconceivable vacuum of space against earth's tiny gravitational field in comparison, gravity wins. That's why empiricism is a good approach and one on which most true science is based upon.

  • @Andrew_BIake
    @Andrew_BIake 8 років тому +280

    What would happen if you put a kitten is there?
    People love cat videos after all!

    • @enderblawk5068
      @enderblawk5068 8 років тому

      Andrew Blake
      Oh my god no

    • @salamanca1954
      @salamanca1954 8 років тому +29

      If you make the box opaque, you will have Schrodinger's Cat.

    • @LohJiaHung
      @LohJiaHung 8 років тому +5

      No you won't, the kitten's death is confirmed, not up to literally scientifically random radioactive decay.

    • @lajoswinkler
      @lajoswinkler 8 років тому

      Schrödinger's cat is an analogy to a phenomenon that occurs ONLY on quantum scales. It does NOT work with cats or macroscopical objects. Only things like photons/electrons/other particles.
      Also, putting mammals (or any other animal that is capable of feeling pain and suffering) in vacuum would be an incredibly immoral thing to do. Also a crime that would get him to jail.
      The author did put a fly inside, but they don't experience that, so it's not a problem.

    • @salamanca1954
      @salamanca1954 8 років тому +4

      I know the experiment. I was making a joke.

  • @silverspike1399
    @silverspike1399 6 років тому +6

    You don't even have to test it, aircrafts fly on air, air lifts them, an if it's not there..., that's why most aircrafts can't go above a specific point, because theres not much air left

  • @MrTenad
    @MrTenad 8 років тому +10

    This was a cool demonstration on drone physics!
    Did you notice that you could still use the controller to rotate the drone around it's axis? That particular control mechanism does not require air as it is based on adjusting the speed difference (angular momentum difference) of the CCW and CW rotating motors.
    However, this will not work if there's too much friction between the drone legs and the vacuum chamber floor but I'm guessing that with such smooth surface it would work.

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  8 років тому +2

      +Jouni Knuuttila I didn't know that! That is awesome, I did notice how it still turned slightly!

    • @SquirrelSniper138
      @SquirrelSniper138 8 років тому

      Jouni Knuuttila unfortunately he turned the vacuum off so when the balloon released its pressure the vacuum chamber walls providing something to react against.... Closed universe system... What would happen if, like the drone test the vacuum remained on.... The more negative pressure would snuff any extra pressures present....

    • @andrewssd
      @andrewssd Рік тому

      I know that sound waves can not travel in the vacuum of space. So radio waves can?

    • @MrTenad
      @MrTenad Рік тому

      @@andrewssd Yes - radio waves can travel in the vacuum of space.

  • @Izumi_-de7jl
    @Izumi_-de7jl 8 років тому +12

    I liked the way u tied that balloon with the help of magnets

  • @kmeiswinkle8143
    @kmeiswinkle8143 7 років тому +11

    It appears that the balloon pushes off the walls of the chamber- watch it in slow motion. I think for one to gain anything from this experiment, you would have to redo it and prevent the walls of the chamber from coming into play. As is, it is inconclusive... A simultaneous view of the pressure guage would be nice too. The first part with the quad copter was was interesting.

    • @Justwantahover
      @Justwantahover 3 роки тому

      The drone wasn't forced down by air pressure like flat earthers assurt.

    • @dsmtsi
      @dsmtsi 2 роки тому +3

      The balloon experiment is 100% flawed as it ia releasing pressurized air into the tank and pushing off the walls. For the first half second the Baloo doesn't move at all until more air is released giving the rest of the air something to push on.
      The drone is more accurate of the fact that there is no way for perpulaion to work in space.

    • @shaunigothictv1003
      @shaunigothictv1003 2 роки тому +1

      Excellent point k.

    • @maddy123sir
      @maddy123sir 2 роки тому +1

      I say this too

    • @11cookeaw14
      @11cookeaw14 2 роки тому

      ​@@dsmtsi Nope, even at 0.25x it's clear to me that it starts moving immediately.

  • @naresh8743
    @naresh8743 6 років тому

    Awesome!! It's a great channel for fun and easy learning for kids and adults.. we follow almost every video.

  • @theemikeyboiii2455
    @theemikeyboiii2455 7 років тому +6

    reading these comments makes me think if people are trying to be idiots on purpose

    • @Vajrabrother
      @Vajrabrother 6 років тому

      Yeah, really "almost" !!
      maybe this helps ??
      ua-cam.com/video/m6qJh9upqW8/v-deo.html
      This is some footage .....and rockets even have self destruct procedures when "tilted" too much or off course !!
      Which did not even seem to be case with the "Challenger" disaster !! (O rings)
      or possibly this vid helps with 9/11
      ua-cam.com/video/9eh7hMOMWoo/v-deo.html
      Who knows ?? (the "viewers themselves" !)

  • @rogueshadow_3268
    @rogueshadow_3268 8 років тому +13

    Well heres the answer to your question, can you swim in nothing?

    • @mayhemmike1789
      @mayhemmike1789 8 років тому +2

      Alex Cowie if your nothing then yeah😞

    • @indoorkite651
      @indoorkite651 8 років тому +1

      I came here for the sarcastic comments, and wasn't disappointed...

    • @BeepingSheep
      @BeepingSheep 8 років тому +5

      Alex Cowie It depends how drunk you are

    • @johnklumpp7901
      @johnklumpp7901 8 років тому +5

      Alex Cowie.
      I have indeed gone swimming while wearing nothing at all. One does have much more freedom of movement without the restriction of apparel.
      www.infobarrel.com/media/image/35129_max.jpg

  • @RamyFal
    @RamyFal 8 років тому +16

    try to put a heavy gas in the chamber
    the sulfur-hexaflorid
    and try the helium too
    please

    • @gorgeous2135
      @gorgeous2135 8 років тому +2

      Ramy RDJ what do expect to happen? Because you can't see gas and lower pressure won't do much.

    • @RamyFal
      @RamyFal 8 років тому +1

      He can tries it but without acticvating the pump
      Just filling the chamber , put the drone in it and close it
      I want to see if it will fly more easily or with more difficulty

    • @Geniuseus
      @Geniuseus 8 років тому +5

      It will fly a bit more easily in a heavy gas and much harder if at all in hydrogen.
      G.

    • @rune.theocracy
      @rune.theocracy 8 років тому +2

      sulfur hexafluoride is extremely dense, the helicopter would probably float without even starting the engine.
      hydrogen is a little dense, but not dense enough to carry an RC quadcopter with a plastic frame covering circuitry (wired with conductive metals such as nickel, a bit of chrome, zinc, copper) that may be supported with small steel (iron and carbon) and/or covered/made with zinc.
      no hat plez

    • @johnklumpp7901
      @johnklumpp7901 8 років тому

      -- AtomNyuszi, and if it makes a noise it could sound like Donald Duck (If its helium, that is!)

  • @OMARYassin1
    @OMARYassin1 6 років тому

    Really nice video ❤️
    Thanks

  • @nunyabiznez6381
    @nunyabiznez6381 8 років тому +166

    When I was a young child they were still teaching in grade school science class that there was a mysterious barrier between the atmosphere and space that would prevent space travel from ever being possible. That was after Sputnik but before the first manned Mercury flights. They talked about Russian cosmonauts but a lot of reporters back then pretended that the Russians had perpetrated a hoax. My teacher in first grade insisted that it was a hoax and insisted that in college they taught her that space flight would be forever impossible and was the stuff of science fiction only. Of course within a couple of years she was proven wrong and a couple of years after that we watched men walk on the moon. The truth is, until you actually attempt to do something, theory means squat.

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  8 років тому +15

      +nunya biznez that's funny, people really hope for a good conspiracy

    • @drewgo2828
      @drewgo2828 8 років тому +2

      nunya biznez its called the van allen belt and you can read about it on Nasa's website

    • @Anonymousg64
      @Anonymousg64 8 років тому +4

      was she sold on actual mathematics and evidence based theory or merely conjecture?
      thats the problem with education institutions, theres no formal questioning mechanism that is taught, if they did, the students would quickly realize they can learn better, faster, cheaper from the internet, then university would just be used for their hardware resource and supervision, advanced maker spaces basicly
      if i was elon musk, i would prototype enclosed mars colony's on earth and use them as giant engineer incubators, free living as long as your willing to develop yourself and commit to serving mankind, bring in 12-32 year olds to get a better start on life

    • @johnklumpp7901
      @johnklumpp7901 8 років тому +3

      drewgo2828
      "The Van Allen belts were the first discovery of the space age, measured with the launch of a US satellite, Explorer 1, in 1958." Thus, any school teacher would not be aware of this feature prior to this date.
      Many who refer to the van Allen Belts (there are more than just one) do not understand that these belts of charged particles form "a nearly impenetrable barrier that prevents the fastest, most energetic electrons from reaching Earth". They do not impede solid mater, such as meteors.
      Now, YOU should do some research to understand just what is an electron in transit from our sun.
      Second fact- If one examines any belt, even one that can be worn about the waist, one should notice a large circular hole at the top and at the bottom. If one attempted to restrain a captured prisoner with only a circular fence (but no leg irons) and that prisoner was a good high jumper . . . . how effective is that barrier?

    • @fredhenry101
      @fredhenry101 8 років тому +2

      You are correct, a belt tends to have holes on the top and bottom. However, since we exist in a three dimensional universe, things have a tendency to become spherical a bit more often than in a two dimensional universe. Also, even assuming that they don't, the belt will likely be gathered around the equator, else the charged particles would be rushing to the poles and would form spots instead of belts. Basic magnetism. Issue is, humans live closer to that equator than to the poles, meaning a rocket launched straight up passes through the belts or has to go into a polar orbit and escape trajectory, which is awkward as the moon is not in a polar orbit to the earth, making rendezvous near impossible due to the moon's low gravity.

  • @OmicronChan
    @OmicronChan 7 років тому +30

    This is some serious fundamental science knowledge that children entering their first year of highschool should already know. The difference between a helicopter and a rocket....

    • @ryansteele2446
      @ryansteele2446 7 років тому

      OmicronChan you do understand how rockets and propulsion works right? There must be air to push off of for propulsion to work.

    • @my3dviews
      @my3dviews 7 років тому +1

      +Ryan Steele No air is needed for a rocket to push off of. That is just what uneducated people think. Rockets generate thrust by ejecting fuel that has mass at high velocities. That creates a reaction force that pushed the rocket in the opposite direction of the fuel being ejected. In fact, rockets work better in a vacuum, because they don't have any air resistance in the direction of travel.
      A rocket is not an airplane that pushes against air. I suggest you do some research on the subject.

    • @my3dviews
      @my3dviews 7 років тому

      +Ryan Steele Why would a rocket need air to fly? Please explain. How did all of the satellites get into orbit that are used for weather and satellite TV?

    • @my3dviews
      @my3dviews 7 років тому +1

      +Ryan Steele Can't you make a comment without insults?
      I know a lot about how rockets work, and they don't need air. They do need oxygen, which is why they have oxygen tanks as well as fuel tanks. but they don't push on air for propulsion.
      www.livescience.com/34475-how-do-space-rockets-work-without-air.html

    • @TKZprod
      @TKZprod 6 років тому

      I don't get why there are so many ignorant people in this video comments :O
      How can they know how to read and write but have such a lack of knowledge? And why are they going so fast to insults? Are they from USA? Are there educational issues in your country?
      I'm being serious here, I'm really surprised, I've seen a dozen of them around here like him...

  • @unitedpandalas7229
    @unitedpandalas7229 6 років тому +193

    The moon is flat

    • @hunormagyar1843
      @hunormagyar1843 6 років тому +5

      Was it a joke? 😂

    • @bdamayanti957
      @bdamayanti957 6 років тому +6

      Its cuboidal

    • @thewalrus2859
      @thewalrus2859 6 років тому +13

      How can it be flat if it isn’t real?

    • @rajeshdas6539
      @rajeshdas6539 6 років тому +30

      Pffss.. you believe in the moon?
      It's a hologram set up by the US government during the cold war to trick the Russians
      *_StUpiD_*

    • @Sglaucoss
      @Sglaucoss 6 років тому +10

      The moon is piece of big cheese.

  • @paone2754
    @paone2754 3 роки тому +3

    I could feel the drone crying for air 😭

  • @minciNashu
    @minciNashu 6 років тому +15

    Next, what happens if you take a fish out of the water

  • @dosluke
    @dosluke 8 років тому +13

    -.5 atmospheres... how does that work again? XD

    • @1TW1-m5i
      @1TW1-m5i 8 років тому +2

      Could he be giving amounts of air pressure removed?

    • @HFV_Junkyardin
      @HFV_Junkyardin 8 років тому +2

      Dosluke idk one atmosphere or one bar, is 16psi. So basically -.5 atmospheres would be 8psi.

    • @dosluke
      @dosluke 8 років тому

      you can actually have negative atmospheres?

    • @Joaking91
      @Joaking91 8 років тому +2

      Dosluke idk in physics and engineering they have absolute pressure which cant be less than 0, amd relative pressure which is relative to the atmosphere so it can go down to -1 atm

    • @Joaking91
      @Joaking91 8 років тому

      Dosluke idk its merely a convenient scale sonce most of our machines work under 1 atm of external air pressure so we cancel it out

  • @TreasureByMeasure
    @TreasureByMeasure 6 років тому

    Great experiment! Loved it.

    • @leekelantan618
      @leekelantan618 3 роки тому

      Use the rocket concept. Then re -enter the video recording here. Astronauts do not use drones. Astronauts use rockets. You use drones because you don’t know rockets. You don’t know newton’s third law

  • @joneichelberg6432
    @joneichelberg6432 6 років тому +6

    Sorry but no.
    1. No longer a vacuum once the air is expelled.
    2. Air is reacting against the solid wall of the chamber.

    • @simonshack1
      @simonshack1 5 років тому +3

      Dear Susan, it does indeed appear that he barely ran the compressor (to lower the chamber's air pressure). But you have it upside down: if he had done so (i.e. created a "serious" vacuum in the chamber), the balloon would have expanded very significantly (not shrunk) - and probably burst. Also, it is no wonder that the balloon moved once he removed the magnet: the air it contained, of course, pushed against the wall of the chamber! In space, things are very different: firstly, there are no walls (nor air) to push against. Secondly, no man-made pressurized container (such as rocket fuel tanks) is able to sustain the massive pressure differential between itself and "outer space" (which starts at about 100km of altitude, the so-called "Karman line"). If it even reaches this altitude (hot air balloons stop ascending at about 45km) - in spite of the thinning atmosphere providing ever less "opposite reaction", the rocket will either (1) explode catastrophically or (2) its pressurized fuel will be violently sucked out in a microsecond (according to the well established laws of thermodynamics) and NO force will be applied to the rocket itself (so as to make it continue its ascension up & away from Earth's gravity). In other words: rockets flying around in outer space (and steering / maneuvering / accelerating / braking at will!) are a physical impossibility - and a pure fantasy (exploited by the powers that be). And no, Earth is NOT flat.

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 5 років тому

      @@simonshack1 - The "massive pressure differential" you speak of is an additional 14.7 psi from the lack of surrounding atmosphere and stick a firehose in a vacuum chamber and turn it on if it still flops around rockets work in space

  • @elireloaded
    @elireloaded 8 років тому +6

    Up next: will water make stuff wet?

    • @-danR
      @-danR 8 років тому +5

      Some yes, some no. Some stuff, called 'superhydrophobic', actively _repel_ water.

  • @RahilDogra
    @RahilDogra 6 років тому +3

    The drone flew as high in vacuum as my grades in school

  • @theultimatehunt
    @theultimatehunt 3 роки тому

    OH YEAHHHH! Love the wonders of science!!!!

  • @MultiMatt0202
    @MultiMatt0202 8 років тому +4

    a question that really doesnt need testing lol

  • @homomorphic
    @homomorphic 6 років тому +13

    They weren't guessing and hoping that rockets would work in a vacuum, they knew without question that it would work and they'd actually seen it work in vacuum chambers (they weren't so lame that they created the vacuum chambers to "make sure" that physics was right, they ran them in vacuum chambers to see if there were any mechanical issues they had neglected to consider in the design of the rocket motor).

    • @ChrisCooper312
      @ChrisCooper312 5 років тому +3

      What a lot of people don't take into account (and flat earthers ignore) is that space doesn't just start, it's not just atmosphere then vacuum, it's a gradual pressure decrease. By the time you're at cruising altitude for jets, the pressure is already 1/3 of what it is on the ground. They had plenty of experience of flying aircraft and rockets higher and higher before they managed to get them into space. The V2 was able to reach very close to the Karman Line, which is typically accepted as the boundary of space. At that point air pressure is negligible.

    • @hotheadedjoelhaha
      @hotheadedjoelhaha 4 роки тому +3

      @@ChrisCooper312 Good point but how does any type of Rocket START it's movement WHILE already In Space? That is the Question, not how does it GET to space. Space is Not a chamber.

    • @leekelantan618
      @leekelantan618 3 роки тому

      Rockets, drones, submarines.. Open the video using the rocket concept. Do you know rockets? This is a video for a drone. Astronauts use rockets. Not a drone. The person who made this video didn’t know about rockets
      Submarine technology. In the sea can breathe. Rocket technology for space. Astronauts use rockets. Not a drone. At sea can breathe sitting in a submarine. When we know the method we can live and fly into space
      Experiment
      the rocket moves in a vacuum chamber. Evidence of rockets flying in space
      Use the rocket concept. Then re -enter the video recording here. Astronauts do not use drones. Astronauts use rockets. You use drones because you don’t know rockets. You don’t know newton’s third law
      ua-cam.com/video/GxBRQXxBRic/v-deo.html

    • @leekelantan618
      @leekelantan618 3 роки тому

      @@hotheadedjoelhaha Rockets, drones, submarines.. Open the video using the rocket concept. Do you know rockets? This is a video for a drone. Astronauts use rockets. Not a drone. The person who made this video didn’t know about rockets
      Submarine technology. In the sea can breathe. Rocket technology for space. Astronauts use rockets. Not a drone. At sea can breathe sitting in a submarine. When we know the method we can live and fly into space
      Experiment
      the rocket moves in a vacuum chamber. Evidence of rockets flying in space
      Use the rocket concept. Then re -enter the video recording here. Astronauts do not use drones. Astronauts use rockets. You use drones because you don’t know rockets. You don’t know newton’s third law
      ua-cam.com/video/GxBRQXxBRic/v-deo.html

    • @leekelantan618
      @leekelantan618 3 роки тому

      @@ChrisCooper312 Rockets, drones, submarines.. Open the video using the rocket concept. Do you know rockets? This is a video for a drone. Astronauts use rockets. Not a drone. The person who made this video didn’t know about rockets
      Submarine technology. In the sea can breathe. Rocket technology for space. Astronauts use rockets. Not a drone. At sea can breathe sitting in a submarine. When we know the method we can live and fly into space
      Experiment
      the rocket moves in a vacuum chamber. Evidence of rockets flying in space
      Use the rocket concept. Then re -enter the video recording here. Astronauts do not use drones. Astronauts use rockets. You use drones because you don’t know rockets. You don’t know newton’s third law
      ua-cam.com/video/GxBRQXxBRic/v-deo.html

  • @digitexstudios5634
    @digitexstudios5634 3 роки тому +3

    Interesting how the drone could still rotate around the pitch axis. This is because rotation is done through reaction of the opposite spinning props, as opposed to movement of air.

  • @visi2tirana
    @visi2tirana 6 років тому

    It was interesting to watch . Thanks 👌👌

  • @nlogan1989
    @nlogan1989 6 років тому +6

    Totally plausible argument, assuming the rocket has six walls to thrust against...

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 5 років тому

      Rocket thrust works like a fire hose. The force produced by the hose is not caused by the water hitting air it's caused by the pressure of the water leaving the hose

  • @NeutronicalGaming
    @NeutronicalGaming 6 років тому +5

    Here's a better idea, drone in a pressure chamber. can it fly longer with more dense air? the denser air is harder to move but generates more lift with each propeller rotation.

    • @furynick4541
      @furynick4541 6 років тому

      Yep I was wondering about him saying that as well, since the goal is to achieve zero pressure.

  • @JeshuSavesEndTimeMinistry21C
    @JeshuSavesEndTimeMinistry21C 6 років тому +14

    There are no such phenomena as a *"vacuum in space"*
    The balloon was propelled against the expelled air and
    the barrier in the very confined space of the chamber

    • @elmerfox6872
      @elmerfox6872 5 років тому +8

      You weren't supposed to catch that, much less say anything about it! This video is designed for those incapable of thinking for themselves

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 5 років тому +1

      @@elmerfox6872 - Put a firehose in a vacuum chamber and turn it on if it still flops around rockets work in space

    • @kneedragnr1
      @kneedragnr1 5 років тому +3

      @@PabloGonzalez-hv3td A firehose that is expelling water would be creating it's own medium. Again, bad example.

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 5 років тому +1

      @@kneedragnr1 - What do you think a rocket does?

    • @kneedragnr1
      @kneedragnr1 5 років тому

      @@PabloGonzalez-hv3td It propels. But, it needs a medium to do so.

  • @tusharrawat6259
    @tusharrawat6259 6 років тому

    A very good job my brother...👍🤙

  • @zbyszkokopec1502
    @zbyszkokopec1502 2 роки тому +3

    rockets do not work in a vacuum - The Earth is flat.

    • @Lee.S..B
      @Lee.S..B 2 роки тому

      So a handgun, when fired wouldn't recoil in a vacuum?

  • @ItzTiko
    @ItzTiko 8 років тому +4

    legend says he wont replie

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  8 років тому +9

      +Tiko Pacheco the legends are right...oh wait, I just ruined it!

    • @ItzTiko
      @ItzTiko 8 років тому +2

      Hydraulic Press Action omg

  • @ishandraws8884
    @ishandraws8884 6 років тому +3

    This guy can read you the full harry potter series and it'd still sound boring

  • @Hold_the_Front_777
    @Hold_the_Front_777 2 роки тому

    Thank you I've been looking everywhere for an experiment like this

  • @littleredbowtie2788
    @littleredbowtie2788 6 років тому +16

    Helicopters have a maximum ceiling hight of operation
    No atmosphere no forward are upward motion
    Your balloon had Resistance against the wall of your small vacuum chamber

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 5 років тому

      Rocket thrust works like a fire hose the force produced by the hose is not caused by the water hitting air it's caused by the pressure of the water leaving the hose

    • @Explosivo55
      @Explosivo55 4 роки тому

      @@PabloGonzalez-hv3td yes it does, the density of the air, is enough for the pressure to push onto and create momentum. everything about space is complete science fiction

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 4 роки тому

      @@Explosivo55 Bring a firehose in a vacuum chamber and see for yourself.

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 4 роки тому

      @ Vacuum creates no force. The number you mentioned is just a minuscule pressure between 0 and 1 psi. The atmosphere isn't "pressurized" the pressure is from weight alone like the ocean (15000+ psi at its deepest). It doesn't float into space for the same reason the ocean doesn't - gravity.

  • @LupeVods
    @LupeVods 6 років тому +37

    Quick answer :
    NO

  • @gottogo8675
    @gottogo8675 3 роки тому +4

    There is no outer space

  • @edimarbrito
    @edimarbrito 6 років тому

    Thank you for answering my questions

  • @Josh-rd5dw
    @Josh-rd5dw 7 років тому +23

    The answer is no.... there I saved 3 min of your life

    • @iwannarock101
      @iwannarock101 7 років тому +2

      squishy duck thanks man. Thats a whole cigarette

    • @akashafofo6939
      @akashafofo6939 7 років тому

      yeah but i want to see it for entertaiment so you just spoiled the fun

  • @oimate4201
    @oimate4201 7 років тому +5

    The balloon just flopped around and fell downward to the bottom of the vacuum chamber. The gas that the ballon was expelling also was able to push off of the inside of the chamber wall, much like a rocket pushing off of a launch pad.
    Based on these observations, this was a poorly set up experiment IF the goal was to prove conclusively that rocket propulsion is possible in a vacuum. Watching the balloon's reaction really does more to disprove propulsion in a vacuum than support it from what I'm seeing here with my eyes.
    I imagine it'd be difficult to set up a more accurate experiment that would eliminate the vehicle's ability to push off of the side walls to obtain propulsion, but overall this was a really neat experiment. Thank you for sharing.

    • @nicejungle
      @nicejungle 7 років тому +1

      flattard

    • @Vajrabrother
      @Vajrabrother 6 років тому

      "Yes" sadly balloons flop about ..... (heheheheheh) and rubber as mass is subjected to gravity and do not have their own steering !!
      "Right you are" !

  • @TheFlatEarthChannelcom
    @TheFlatEarthChannelcom 4 роки тому +9

    Thanks for proving space can’t exist.

    • @gregpavitt309
      @gregpavitt309 4 роки тому +2

      On the contrary this video shows that vacuum space does exist
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum

    • @Eatinbritches
      @Eatinbritches 3 роки тому +1

      lmao I'll bite. Explain why this disproves space. Go on.

  • @samcrdx8016
    @samcrdx8016 6 років тому

    Interesting. Nice video😃

    • @leekelantan618
      @leekelantan618 3 роки тому

      Rockets, drones, submarines
      Open the video using the rocket concept. Do you know rockets? This is a video for a drone. Astronauts use rockets. Not a drone. The person who made this video didn’t know about rockets
      Submarine technology. In the sea can breathe. Rocket technology for space. Astronauts use rockets. Not a drone. At sea can breathe sitting in a submarine. When we know the method we can live and fly into space
      Experiment
      the rocket moves in a vacuum chamber. Evidence of rockets flying in space
      Use the rocket concept. Then re -enter the video recording here. Astronauts do not use drones. Astronauts use rockets. You use drones because you don’t know rockets. You don’t know newton’s third law
      ua-cam.com/video/GxBRQXxBRic/v-deo.html

  • @pex_the_unalivedrunk6785
    @pex_the_unalivedrunk6785 6 років тому +105

    Wow, 7.6k thumbs down? Must be a bunch of flat-earthers out there.
    Rockets & balloon fly because they have their own internal force, prop & rotor propelled cannot because they rely on external force.

    • @ToniK-music
      @ToniK-music 6 років тому +2

      No, those was stupid GlobeTards, that think „spaceflight“ is possible in a vacuum.

    • @Zipfreer
      @Zipfreer 6 років тому +4

      Sciencegamer you need to ignite a rockets fuel and will not ignite in a vacuum hence no gases from rocket

    • @Science_Atrium
      @Science_Atrium 6 років тому +7

      @@Zipfreer Yes, the burn of the fuel releases A LOT of gas.

    • @Zipfreer
      @Zipfreer 6 років тому +2

      Sciencegamer How can something burn a vacuum? With no O2 to feed it ? not H20 * autocorrect sucks

    • @Science_Atrium
      @Science_Atrium 6 років тому +15

      @@Zipfreer There is liquid oxigen and fuel inside the rocket, the oxygen burns the fuel inside the propulsors and release gas, you flatters make so many dumb questions... Also that isn's H2O (Water) that burnt things, it's the oxygen (O2), you make it clear and obvious that you are flatters because of lack of knowledge, before humiliating yourself by asking a question like that, research, that's a tip that I give okay?

  • @rattman3975
    @rattman3975 6 років тому +9

    Drones can't fly in a vacuum because of the same reason planes can't fly to space

    • @logiccool
      @logiccool 6 років тому

      This video is for kids. 😂

    • @deoce
      @deoce 6 років тому

      Yeah, because propeller sucks and push air and stuff like that. Im posting this comment at 3.54 AM. I dont know why but why not

    • @abalcells
      @abalcells 4 роки тому

      who can fly in space?

  • @ExelsioHD
    @ExelsioHD 7 років тому +72

    And thats why planes dont fly in Space

    • @Godscountry2732
      @Godscountry2732 7 років тому +10

      And that's why feathers fall at the same speed as a 50 ton tank in a vacuum.

    • @frankfacts6207
      @frankfacts6207 7 років тому

      ExelsioHD nor rockets

    • @HowFromTwitter
      @HowFromTwitter 7 років тому +3

      Actually, rocket fuel is mixed with liquid oxidiser for space travel. So the fuel is able to be ignited.

    • @what9418
      @what9418 7 років тому +6

      Brogle some people think that rockets propell by pushing off air... They are unable to understand that a rocket is pushed because of pressure in the combustion chamber.
      Heck, they don't even know what pressure is as they think a vacuum produces force...

    • @frankfacts6207
      @frankfacts6207 7 років тому

      Danny Sedney if there's a failure in understanding it's because there's been a failure to illustrate (rationally with applicable established principles) nasa claims

  • @Justwantahover
    @Justwantahover 3 роки тому +1

    The drone wasn't forced down by air pressure like many flat earthers assert.

  • @artdestination3009
    @artdestination3009 8 років тому +59

    that's a toy, not a drone

    • @neon4863
      @neon4863 8 років тому +22

      By definition, it's a drone. A toy drone.

    • @artdestination3009
      @artdestination3009 8 років тому +6

      Neon - TC ....no that is toy....want proof?.. drone definition: a remote-controlled pilotless aircraft or missile, that has or/and is operated by an on board camera......his TOY doesnt have a camera.......and language terms.....ROASTED!!!

    • @neon4863
      @neon4863 8 років тому +15

      fuddle128260394 Quadcopters fall under the category of drones, don't they? Also they don't have to hold a camera or be capable autonomous flight. That's just an unmanned aerial vehicle which also falls under the category of drones.

    • @artdestination3009
      @artdestination3009 8 років тому +4

      Neon - TC im done arguing, that 20$ toy is NOT a drone, a real drone is way more expensive and advanced. just becuase u put some propellers of crap doesnt make it a drone.

    • @Nox_Lunatera
      @Nox_Lunatera 8 років тому +28

      quadcopters are drones dumbass.
      it doesnt matter how cheap or tiny it may be.

  • @therealzilch
    @therealzilch 7 місяців тому +2

    Will a drone fly in a vacuum? How many guesses do I get?
    I came here expecting to see lots of "rockets need air to push off of" comments by flat Earthers, and I was not disappointed. What puzzles me, though, is that they are slumming around UA-cam, when they could all be Nobel Prize winners for disproving Newton.

  • @kalimjabari3397
    @kalimjabari3397 6 років тому +4

    I'd like to see a balloon that's suspended in a larger vacuum chamber, so there's no possibility to have thrust off a wall.

    • @rays5163
      @rays5163 5 років тому +1

      It would work. I think you’re forgetting that the inside of the balloon is a “wall”

  • @alifajmi9699
    @alifajmi9699 5 років тому +3

    1900 : there wil be a flying car in the future
    2019: unflying drone