Jaw-dropping Science Toys/Gadgets 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 149

  • @physicsfun
    @physicsfun  4 місяці тому +3

    04:28 Challenge-1: why does the
    larger disk (giraff) move
    faster than the smaller
    (monkey)?
    07:44 Challenge-2
    I want you all to answer. Don't worry about getting it right or wrong. Just answer!

    • @PG-uq5lq
      @PG-uq5lq 4 місяці тому +8

      The disks spin at the same speed. The giraffe disc has a larger circumference, which is why it goes faster (more distance at each turn)

    • @hanuraj9796
      @hanuraj9796 4 місяці тому +2

      because the circumference is different

    • @ezlus
      @ezlus 4 місяці тому +2

      1 the greater circumference causes the disk to move more quickly 2 the magnesium is less dense than the tungsten

    • @Tenshihan-Quinn
      @Tenshihan-Quinn 4 місяці тому +4

      C1-A: It's not JUST that the larger disk has more surface area, ...that's definitely part of it, but the reason is HOW it uses that surface area - as more of it comes "in contact" with the top, transferring more kinetic energy due to 'friction & drag'. The smaller one does NOT have the contact needed to keep it's own spin up.

    • @Tenshihan-Quinn
      @Tenshihan-Quinn 4 місяці тому +1

      C2-A: Magnesium's Atomic number is just "12" = Atomic mass: 24.305 u - therefore less dense material, ...whereas Tungsten's Atomic number is "74" (Atomic mass of 183.3 u) making it far more dense (heavier).

  • @beastpunisher421
    @beastpunisher421 4 місяці тому +3

    4:28 the larger disk has a larger surface area, so it has more friction and rotational force from the top.
    8:03 Tungsten(W) is one of the densest metals out there. Which means you need less Tungsten to equal an equivalent weight of a less dense (i.e. lighter) metal such as Magnesium(Mg)

  • @JonMurray
    @JonMurray 4 місяці тому +5

    These were awesome! Really nice background music too. Super chilled.

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому +1

      Glad you like them!
      I love science because it is the only thing that makes sense of this world.

    • @JonMurray
      @JonMurray 4 місяці тому

      @@physicsfun could not agree more :)

  • @NeilCrouse99
    @NeilCrouse99 3 місяці тому +5

    LOL, ... That popsicle sticks bomb was something I did with my cousins back in 1972 when I was 6 yrs old. My cousin, my age, showed me how to make them and we'd fire them at each other playing war games... (I know, ... it's ALL fun and games until someone loses an eye), ... *: )*

    • @nywrep
      @nywrep 3 місяці тому

      we made them in 1956 when I was six years old.

    • @mournblade1066
      @mournblade1066 Місяць тому

      @@nywrep Well WE made them in 1826 when I was six years old.

    • @A._Meroy
      @A._Meroy Місяць тому

      @@mournblade1066 You were six years old in 1826? This means you're 204 years old in 2024? Geez, you're really old.

    • @mournblade1066
      @mournblade1066 Місяць тому

      @@A._Meroy Yeppers!

  • @TheVIPain
    @TheVIPain 4 місяці тому +4

    "Kunst bin ich, Wissenschaft sind wir"; 4/5
    THX for the impressions! ^^

  • @duomaxwell1210
    @duomaxwell1210 4 місяці тому +40

    Clickbait - no sparks between magnets! 🤨

    • @samarthFI
      @samarthFI 4 місяці тому +1

      hello respected friend
      he do it so that you click his video so that one can relax, one can get knowledge of science, leads to get our fear of science vanishes, the way he presents makes us aware that in everthing there is science, so that one can get knowledge about science concepts, also he do made his thumnail in such a way so that one can imagine beyond their thoughts by seeing the thumnail, so that one can create a innovative mindset, so that one can get curious about those toys, how they are working, how can these concepts used to solve world problems, so that one get their heart fall in love with science rather than scaring, so that you can get interest in engineering, in physics in science and so that one day you create that revolutionery thing for the world, for the humanity, my english vocablury is not that good i will improve it, i hope you got what i am trying to say my friend
      i noticed a lot of people saying him why he creates his thumnail that way, atleast he is not wasting your time by making useless videos, the music used in background help you relax and the knowledge he gives in almost 8 minutes we dont get it in our old schools, the way he give challenges increase ones curosity about that
      Thank you respected people outthere :)

    • @newtoncooper4085
      @newtoncooper4085 4 місяці тому +4

      Read the title, ignore the AI thumbnails.

    • @samarthFI
      @samarthFI 4 місяці тому +1

      hello respected friend
      he do it so that you click his video so that one can relax, one can get knowledge of science, leads to get our fear of science vanishes, the way he presents makes us aware that in everthing there is science, so that one can get knowledge about science concepts, also he do made his thumnail in such a way so that one can imagine beyond their thoughts by seeing the thumnail, so that one can create a innovative mindset, so that one can get curious about those toys, how they are working, how can these concepts used to solve world problems, so that one get their heart fall in love with science rather than scaring, so that you can get interest in engineering, in physics in science and so that one day you create that revolutionery thing for the world, for the humanity, my english vocablury is not that good i will improve it, i hope you got what i am trying to say my friend
      i noticed a lot of people saying him why he creates his thumnail that way, atleast he is not wasting your time by making useless videos, the music used in background help you relax and the knowledge he gives in almost 8 minutes we dont get it in our old schools, the way he give challenges increase ones curosity about that
      Thank you respected people outthere
      :)

    • @DoNotPushHere
      @DoNotPushHere 4 місяці тому +2

      Because plugging each magnet to a mains line would be somehow dangerous to say the least :P
      Jokes aside, yes, I agree with you but I stick to this channel for the quality within.
      It also gets me mad when the "wait for it" countdown starts but in the end,nothing truly different happens. It just keeps spinning or keeps bolting or keeps levitating... whoa? Yes, but, I already saw it

    • @danielbaker8647
      @danielbaker8647 4 місяці тому +2

      You are the real mvp

  • @timacrow
    @timacrow 4 місяці тому +4

    I remember making popsicle stick bombs as a kid (I am in my 60s now)!

  • @metern
    @metern 4 місяці тому +3

    Using almost the same flywheel as the one at 4:46, we machined grooves on the side of it so we could use an airblower to spin it up at high speed. That one lasted more than 30 min. And it was almost impossible to move because of the centrifugal force 😉.

    • @metern
      @metern 4 місяці тому +1

      Be warned. It is a really dangerous thing to doo. The speed can really hurt you if your finger gets between the weel and frame when it spins aat high speeds.

  • @pauls5745
    @pauls5745 4 місяці тому +4

    The plasma cups were pretty cool.

    • @NoNo_mine
      @NoNo_mine 3 місяці тому

      They got one thing wrong with the "neon" plasma cups, ionized neon glows bright orange but the cups plasma is blue so it's most likely xenon or argon which both glow blue.

  • @gbm9115
    @gbm9115 4 місяці тому +2

    Cool thank you 👍

  • @jtc1947
    @jtc1947 3 місяці тому +2

    "WAIT FOR IT (on the Magnetron) Wait for what???

  • @samarthFI
    @samarthFI 4 місяці тому +9

    Challenge 1 answer - I think thats cause of its bigger size means its higher circumference, due to its higher circumference giraff travels more distance on that surface. Its angular velocity increases cause of increased circumference (i mentioned all the points that came in my mind)
    Challenge 2 answer - Although it seems weird/cool that small part of cube is equal to thhat big part thats happening because that small part is made up of tungsten metal and bigger one with magnesium and small part has equal mass in less volume as compared to that big part, this is because tungsten(small part) metal has very high density and its atom consists more number of protons and neutrons than that of magnesium(larger part), magnesium metal has very less density as compared to tungsten, so its all game of density and to the one who made a perfect size cube in such a ratio that both have equal masses but in different volume cause of density
    i am sorry i may have over ellaborated things, i will improve it
    Thank you :)

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому +3

      You are intelligent ❤️
      50/50 Cube: a handheld study in material density contrast. This precision machined block is comprised of equal 200g masses of the metals tungsten (W) and magnesium (Mg)- however the volume of magnesium is 11 times that of the very dense tungsten! One must hold and manipulate this simple sculpture for greatest impact. W: 19.25g/cm3 Mg: 1.74g/cm3

  • @knife-wieldingspidergod5059
    @knife-wieldingspidergod5059 4 місяці тому +2

    This is like the ultimate museum store.

  • @alanaldpal950
    @alanaldpal950 4 місяці тому +4

    Tungsten is evidently 7 times more dense….. which is why it is used in tank rounds

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      You are intelligent
      Yes! 50/50 Cube: a handheld study in material density contrast. This precision machined block is comprised of equal 200g masses of the metals tungsten (W) and magnesium (Mg)- however the volume of magnesium is 11 times that of the very dense tungsten! One must hold and manipulate this simple sculpture for greatest impact. W: 19.25g/cm3 Mg: 1.74g/cm3

  • @piggysister01
    @piggysister01 2 місяці тому

    The music starting at 5:55.. What IS it?! It sends me into a complete bliss-out state. 5 out of 5!

  • @jdb79jdb79
    @jdb79jdb79 4 місяці тому +4

    FYI @0:44 There is no such thing as a "golden magnet" Gold is not magnetic and does not attract or repel magnetic fields. It's gold coated, so it's just for looks and is irrelevant in any other way. It may seem to be a pedantic observation but this is a physics channel so..

  • @seanp2k617
    @seanp2k617 4 місяці тому +1

    track that comes in @5:51 goes hard… def a 5

  • @asilva781
    @asilva781 4 місяці тому +1

    Very nice video. Music 5.

  • @samarthFI
    @samarthFI 4 місяці тому +5

    I ❤ Science !

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому +2

      ♥️♥️always first

    • @samarthFI
      @samarthFI 4 місяці тому +2

      @@physicsfun ❤cause sir you are my inspiration and i wanna meet you once and take away some of your toys also ;)

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому +1

      ❤️❤️ anytime :D

  • @mijan94
    @mijan94 3 місяці тому

    shilpo holam ami...biggan hocche amra

  • @Regoriroger
    @Regoriroger 4 місяці тому +3

    I'm still waiting for it..

  • @zenonbiusz
    @zenonbiusz Місяць тому

    Świetne efekty, bardzo widowiskowe. Podoba mi się. Oczywiście wiadomo, że wolfram ma gęstość 19.3 g.cm3 (jak złoto), a magnez jest znacznie lżejszy od aluminium i ma gęstość ok. 1.7 g/cm3 :)

  • @catserver8577
    @catserver8577 4 місяці тому +2

    The most amazing things about these devices and videos is in the question: Why are these things not being explored on a large scale basis to make everything more efficient and possibly solve many issues in our world? I'd say I assume they are, but it sure doesn't seem to be spilling over from whimsy to practical applications very quickly. If at all.

    • @tornagawn
      @tornagawn 4 місяці тому +3

      They are often whimsical demonstrations of practical concepts

    • @troywhite6039
      @troywhite6039 4 місяці тому

      The military owns(seizes) all the good patents.

    • @LinksQuest
      @LinksQuest 4 місяці тому +1

      The military hasn’t seized any of the ideas from this video, all the physics stuff and engineering shown in these toys are already general knowledge that either just isn’t a very practical use for on a large scale that is more efficient and cheaper than what we already have or we already use some of the ideas from this stuff already. Give an a ample of a patent of something for this video that has been seized by the military or maybe just not go stating things as a fact if you don’t really know exactly what you are talking about

    • @LeonFelixRusso
      @LeonFelixRusso 4 місяці тому

      @@troywhite6039
      #DunningKrugerGenius

    • @frankyanish4833
      @frankyanish4833 4 місяці тому

      Most of these only work on small scales.

  • @EspiritX360
    @EspiritX360 4 місяці тому

    Challenge 1- Giraff vs Monkey disk
    Short answer: Gear ratios.
    The disks work In the same way that bicycle gears work (or any gear system). The smaller the gear (monkey disk in this case) the less it will rotate compared to the power gear (the spinning top in this case). Where the larger the gear (giraff gear) will rotate more.
    Challenge 2- Tungsten vs Magnesium
    Short answer: Size dose not equal Mass (Tungsten is heavier)
    Tungsten is a very heavy metal and by comparison although the two are different in size, with Tungsten being smaller then the Magnesium, their weight is the same due to the density of the metals.

  • @dorfsteen
    @dorfsteen 4 місяці тому +3

    The popsicle stick bomb I used to make those when I was a kid but we used to throw them and they went like a frisbee they fly like a Frisbee and then they explode when they hit the ground

    • @jimnelsen2064
      @jimnelsen2064 4 місяці тому

      When they hit "the ground". He says, trying to get us to believe he and his friends never threw them at each other.

    • @dorfsteen
      @dorfsteen 4 місяці тому

      @@jimnelsen2064 I don't remember throwing mad each other😵‍💫

    • @jimnelsen2064
      @jimnelsen2064 4 місяці тому

      @@dorfsteen Then clearly you lived a cleaner youth than I did. kudos! lol

  • @smartinro.
    @smartinro. 4 місяці тому +1

    "El arte es yo... La ciencia es nosotros"

  • @ak-cm5ni
    @ak-cm5ni 4 місяці тому

    Only a bad teacher can make physics boring.
    I love science because it is the only thing that makes sense of this world. ❤❤❤

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      ❤️ nice dp

    • @adamkrizek7596
      @adamkrizek7596 4 місяці тому

      But only a very good teacher can make it fun.

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      ❤️❤️
      I love science because it is the only thing that makes sense of this world.

  • @1.4142
    @1.4142 4 місяці тому +2

    Why does the plasma arch curve along the glass like a fractal?

    • @justinmorgan2126
      @justinmorgan2126 4 місяці тому

      Trying to find the path of least resistance which is constantly altering as the charges change across the surface of the glass. It's not fractal just random.

  • @ophelayebistouflaye3838
    @ophelayebistouflaye3838 4 місяці тому

    L'art c'est MOI....La science c'est NOUS

  • @DevibriBnuuy
    @DevibriBnuuy 4 місяці тому

    1:14 haha thing at top go BRRRRRRRR

  • @Kpocc_1928
    @Kpocc_1928 4 місяці тому +1

    Мне нравится наука

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому +1

      Наука - прекрасный подарок человечеству
      Наука - это ключ к нашему будущему.

  • @ErnestMorris-p6g
    @ErnestMorris-p6g 4 місяці тому +1

    The giraffe disk has a greater circumference than the monkey so it travels further each revolution. i know this because i put low profile tyres on my old vdub, and now the speedo's out!

  • @NiMareQ
    @NiMareQ 3 місяці тому

    Can you pour a drink in the plasma cup at 0:17 and 6:56 and still get the effect?

  • @ADude-f3z
    @ADude-f3z 4 місяці тому

    We used to make the “ popsicle stick bombs” in elementary school during lunch…

  • @YCIGAFSN
    @YCIGAFSN 4 місяці тому

    The atomic mass of Tungsten is 7.5638757457 times higher than Magnesium in it's purest form.
    Tungsten - Atomic Mass [u] 183.84, Atomic number 74
    Magnesium - Atomic Mass [u] 24.305, Atomic number 12
    They made the Tungsten slightly smaller that 1/8 of the cube and the Magnesium slightly bigger than 7/8 to make up for the difference in density to volume ratio.

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      You are intelligent :D
      50/50 Cube: a handheld study in material density contrast. This precision machined block is comprised of equal 200g masses of the metals tungsten (W) and magnesium (Mg)- however the volume of magnesium is 11 times that of the very dense tungsten! One must hold and manipulate this simple sculpture for greatest impact. W: 19.25g/cm3 Mg: 1.74g/cm3

  • @markoursic2685
    @markoursic2685 4 місяці тому

    ah with those stuff you are boring in 10 minutes, but with my neighbors never, always something interesting and funny come out😁

  • @martin_racz_a_szerelo
    @martin_racz_a_szerelo 4 місяці тому

    5:14 "Az alkotás az csak én, viszont a tudomány mi vagyunk."

  • @TesserId
    @TesserId 4 місяці тому +3

    The giraffe runs faster because it has longer legs. 😁😁😁

  • @leonardostil977
    @leonardostil977 4 місяці тому

    9999/10 :)

  • @diogeneskoolaid8437
    @diogeneskoolaid8437 4 місяці тому

    man I would have LOVED to have some of these toys back when I was in college in the "hazy days" of the 70's...

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      Thanks for sharing
      ❤️

  • @AWizardAndaMouse3432
    @AWizardAndaMouse3432 4 місяці тому

    Art is I… Science is WE!

  • @notnull5878
    @notnull5878 4 місяці тому

    Given two circles spun at some tangent t, the circle with the larger diameter will have a greater angular velocity, this is because given the same rpm, an arbitrary point has to move over a longer distance to arrive at the same relative location. Since distance s is given by the function v*t, for a given same time interval t, the object with the greater velocity will travel a greater distance.
    This was the harder question, the easier is the second one, the answer is because they have different densities.
    Magnesium is the least dense metal, with a density of about 1.7 grams per cm cubed, whereas tungsten is one of the most dense, with a density of 19.3 grams per cm cubed. You would think then that the magnesium cube would be 10 times larger, but this is not so. In fact this means that one tungsten cube weighs the same as 10 magnesium cubes, if we get the cube root of 10, we get around 2.2, so the magnesium cube would be ~2.2 times bigger than the tungsten one. Given that we know the mass of the cubes, which we round down to 100 we know that the magnesium cube is has dimensions of around 3.7x3.7x3.7cm and the tungsten one around 1.7x1.7x1.7 cm, which indeed follows our guess of around a 2.2 increase in size. EDIT: I meant 2.2 times bigger in dimensions, not in volume, volume is a cube function, so with a 2.2x increase in dimensions the volume would be around 10 times larger indeed.

  • @ritafarris
    @ritafarris 4 місяці тому +1

    I give the background music a 1. I was a little annoyed to be honest.

  • @catkeys6911
    @catkeys6911 23 дні тому

    1:20 As I'm watching the mini "steam engine" spinning, I can't help wondering where the hell is the steam? Does anyone see steam? Think steam locomotive- you see a video of one of those magnificent things, you *always* see steam- it doesn't disappear into the engine somehow.

  • @Patrocloide
    @Patrocloide 4 місяці тому

    "El Arte es YO, la Ciencia es NOSOTROS "

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      Lo más hermoso que podemos experimentar es lo misterioso. Es la fuente de todo verdadero arte y ciencia.

  • @CurseMaster_YT
    @CurseMaster_YT 4 місяці тому

    Challenge (50|50 Cube):
    because it has a higher density

  • @lidluser55
    @lidluser55 9 днів тому

    Emmm, are those plasma cups really neon? Neon would give off orange light, bluish one might be argon or something.

  • @frederipochard8892
    @frederipochard8892 4 місяці тому

    The tungesten volumetric mass density is 7 times the magnesium one?

  • @tinkerbooks2609
    @tinkerbooks2609 4 місяці тому

    50/50 Cube: The magnesium block is bigger because tungsten is much denser, or has higher mass, or weight per volume.

  • @icecreamtruckog3667
    @icecreamtruckog3667 4 місяці тому

    Tungsten(W) has a greater density than Magnesium(Mg), that is why they are the same weight but have different volume.

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      You got it right!
      50/50 Cube: a handheld study in material density contrast. This precision machined block is comprised of equal 200g masses of the metals tungsten (W) and magnesium (Mg)- however the volume of magnesium is 11 times that of the very dense tungsten! One must hold and manipulate this simple sculpture for greatest impact. W: 19.25g/cm3 Mg: 1.74g/cm3

  • @aleksandr9412
    @aleksandr9412 4 місяці тому

    в начале не понел что за левитация в постоянном магнитном поле, а там парамагнетики в узком зазоре.
    п.с. прикольный принцип у карусели

  • @capwkidd
    @capwkidd 4 місяці тому +1

    Answer to the cube question: The atomic weights are different…

  • @leonardfibigerlewis
    @leonardfibigerlewis 4 місяці тому

    Afrikaans: Kuns is Ek…Wetenskap is Ons.

  • @ll7868
    @ll7868 4 місяці тому

    My cat Jabberwocky likes watching these videos, the spinning things in particular. She might be a science nerd.

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      ❤️❤️❤️Glad to hear that
      Thanks for sharing

  • @ChrstphreCampbell
    @ChrstphreCampbell 4 місяці тому +1

    It seems like that tiny, candle driven steam engine would produce a much, much greater amount of electricity than a solar cell of that same volume,if you powered it with focused solar light ?

    • @midimidori4699
      @midimidori4699 4 місяці тому +1

      Under load, it probably wouldn't turn much at all. It's all speed and no torque

    • @troywhite6039
      @troywhite6039 4 місяці тому

      combine enough of them to build up torque

    • @midimidori4699
      @midimidori4699 4 місяці тому

      @@troywhite6039 if you were to use gears to create torque, but the time it has enough to turn the generator, it would be moving negligibly slow.

  • @tamfang
    @tamfang 3 місяці тому +1

    Less repetitive generic music, more explanation.

  • @GoatRefueling
    @GoatRefueling 4 місяці тому

    7:15 Somebody make a bong out of that please.

  • @VishwanathSK
    @VishwanathSK 4 місяці тому +1

    ಕಲೆ ನಾನು, ವಿಜ್ಞಾನವು ನಾವು

  • @Mr_Chris3250
    @Mr_Chris3250 4 місяці тому +1

    Τεχνη είναι ΕΓΩ.....επιστήμη είναι ΕΜΕΙΣ.....

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      Η επιστήμη είναι ένα όμορφο δώρο για την ανθρωπότητα
      Η επιστήμη είναι το κλειδί για το μέλλον μας.

  • @AbstractcurvesSoftware
    @AbstractcurvesSoftware 4 місяці тому

    Искусство это я, наука это мы

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      Самое прекрасное, что мы можем испытать, - это таинственное. Это источник всего настоящего искусства и науки.

  • @christinelight264
    @christinelight264 4 місяці тому +1

    music is a 5

  • @ulyssesk7325
    @ulyssesk7325 4 місяці тому +1

    yes its fields but if you see bad you have to imagine 2 dynamic lowest ths is why einsten is better

    • @ulyssesk7325
      @ulyssesk7325 4 місяці тому

      the candle splitts a time layer the fields start to expand emmit osscuilations and shockwaves, their are simpler formulars to describe this, the relative frozen air has moe static as the freed feidls and stay at theground...

    • @ulyssesk7325
      @ulyssesk7325 4 місяці тому

      its insane hard to imagien this and keep this in mind

  • @franktuckwell196
    @franktuckwell196 4 місяці тому +1

    I always thought the gyroscope was a brilliant bit of kit, had one when i was about ten. Then later on i had an Euler's disk. Alas i gave that away as a present.

  • @BACKFIREFUR
    @BACKFIREFUR 4 місяці тому +1

    I have the flywheel spinner. I’ve gotten on average 1 hour 30 on a good spin. Rely cool.

  • @Janne1Hirmu
    @Janne1Hirmu 3 місяці тому +1

    Horrible music

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  2 місяці тому

      Sorry for the music.
      Thanks for feedback I will definitely work on it.

  • @mfields66
    @mfields66 3 місяці тому

    tungsten is denser than magnesium.

  • @07ring07
    @07ring07 4 місяці тому

    👍❤

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      Science is a beautiful gift to humanity
      Science is the key to our future.
      ❤️❤️

  • @Petri547
    @Petri547 4 місяці тому

    Minä olen taide, me olemme tiede. 🇫🇮

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому +1

      Kaunein asia, jonka voimme kokea, on salaperäinen. Se on kaiken todellisen taiteen ja tieteen lähde.

  • @user-sandeep13
    @user-sandeep13 4 місяці тому

    Tungsten is heavy metal

  • @karinaruvalkaba2179
    @karinaruvalkaba2179 2 місяці тому

    Arte soy yo... Ciencia nosotros
    Is Art is I... Sience We

  • @100nanay
    @100nanay 4 місяці тому

    The tungsten is more dense

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      You are intelligent
      50/50 Cube: a handheld study in material density contrast. This precision machined block is comprised of equal 200g masses of the metals tungsten (W) and magnesium (Mg)- however the volume of magnesium is 11 times that of the very dense tungsten! One must hold and manipulate this simple sculpture for greatest impact. W: 19.25g/cm3 Mg: 1.74g/cm3

  • @waynesinclair9746
    @waynesinclair9746 4 місяці тому

    1

  • @johnglielmi6428
    @johnglielmi6428 4 місяці тому

    The atomic weight of Tungsten is roughly 7.5 times that of Magnesium. there for Tungsten is a denser material and you need less for the same mass.

  • @cmax522769
    @cmax522769 4 місяці тому

    SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!

  • @a.kryptonitemoorsblow4326
    @a.kryptonitemoorsblow4326 4 місяці тому

    50/50 block size difference is because of the density of each one tungsten is 10x more dense than magnesium.

  • @dalmatianlife
    @dalmatianlife 4 місяці тому

    Rwy'n dod yn gelfyddyd. Rydyn ni'n dod yn Wyddoniaeth.

  • @mikerhonevich481
    @mikerhonevich481 2 місяці тому

    Earned my thumbs down! Get rid of the stupid drama music. Learn to talk and give some details, explanations, etc

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  2 місяці тому

      Sorry for the music.
      Thanks for feedback I will definitely work on it.
      Please read video description for details.

  • @sourdoughbornsourdoughbred4712
    @sourdoughbornsourdoughbred4712 4 місяці тому

    Liar

  • @TechsScience
    @TechsScience 4 місяці тому +4

    The tungsten is more denser

    • @physicsfun
      @physicsfun  4 місяці тому

      You got it right!

    • @asrcav8r
      @asrcav8r 4 місяці тому

      "More denser"...