WG would be under a lot of pressure to add a high tier Brit CV that doesn't s#ck, as the amount of complaints that they would have received about how pathetic Audacious is would be enough to move even WG staff into action, hence the Malta... however, from what you have shown us, I think it is better than Audacious and roughly as strong as Midway / German T10 CVs but not as strong as Rus / Jap T10 CVs or FDR in terms of dpm... i know we all hate CV when playing anything else, but lets put this ship in perspective... it is nothing new in terms of effectiveness and not by the standards of it's peers overpowered, though frankly I fear this will get nerfed because the haters will come out in force to pressure WG to ensure that the Brits do not get a competitive carrier. You got 160-140k games not 250k to 300k games, this isn't overpowered, but like all CVs could be quite irritating to play against in the hands of a good player like yourself.
Offspring of a Kaga and Enterprise. Decent HP +speed, a lot of reserves, very low restoration times, consistent bombs good against anything that is not dd or submarine, great torpedoes, decent rockets. What is the weakness supposed to be???
A vulnerabel citadel like other bri'ish CV's have cuz thicc deck armor but horrible belt armor but yeah you ain't gonna reach a scumbag sadly. Even on a sub cuz why not implementing auto ASW if more than half of the cv community has mental disorder to think and breathe at the same time?🤣🤣🤣🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
planes and torps are slow, ap dp not good re dd or v Jap / Russ cv due to their heavily armoured decks, rockets have low pen, basically this is an average T10 CV, better than audacious and roughly as strong as Midway / German T10 CVs but not as strong as Rus / Jap T10 CVs or FDR in terms of dpm... i know we all hate CV when playing anything else, but lets put this ship in perspective... it is nothing new in terms of effectiveness
What am im missing?! Why go back to carrier efter just one drop each time? Isnt that a lot of time just wasted flying out new squadrons? Seems like you could have killed a lot of ships with m,ore follow up strikes. Specially in a CV that prints new planes by the seconds.
The most ridiculous thing is that players in particular servers expect a CV player to work like a flawless individual.. one single mistake and they keep throwing "Noob CV" attribute.. happens in random battle, even if that player did very good job and died in the middle of a fight.
I'm between Malta and Moskva. I'm also almost with almost RB points to get Ohio/Slava. I want good ships for ranked matches, so what you guys recomend me? I have Marceau, F. Sherman and Yoshino.
Premium only? Vampire would be my pick for RB points (or Ohio). If you have Daring, I would go for Ohio. Slawa is only good once your enemy is bad - Ohio is always good. Regarding Moskwa vs. Malta: Moskwa is prone to get citadeled, but if you play well, it's a good ship with useful equipments. Malta is a CV and because of that, it shouldn't be played. In a ranked CV match the game is massivly dominated by a good CV player. Since CV matches are rather rare in ranked, it's highl likely that you see a good/better CV player but also have to wait long for a match. Because of that, my pick would be the Moskwa.
Wouldn't get Moskva since Petro is just the better ship in any aspect. Ohio is better than Slava imo since its more consistent. If you are not interested in any other coal ship I would just get Malta since it's atleast different than Audacious. Petro is Moskva+++ but "free to get" She is more flat, less superstructure, better concealment, better guns...
@@doug683 If it's better than Petro depends on playstyle. If you want gun power and Survivability, Petro is the way to go. Deck got a bit nerfed but the overall Survivability is still far better with its Ice breaker, small silhouette, slim citadel, small superstructure and 360 Turrets. The only downside is the turret Survivability
For T10 ranked matches, the best battleships are Kremlin, sometimes Schlieffen, and Ohio. As for destroyers, you can go with 4 main picks, smaland, marceau, kleber and vampire. If you don't have them, daring and halland will work. As for cruisers, petro or stalin pick one. If you're willing to gamble on the map, DM and Salem are extremely good. Lastly, for CVs you either want Haku, Midway, or Malta. Russian Cvs can get easily spawnsniped, German CVs are too weak against DDs, and Audacious is just bad.
They not invulnerable !! AA in this game work like this: over 3.5km, your shooting both Flaks and Machine cannons (Continuos damage), inside 3.5km, only Machine cannons !! And as you can imagine, the damage inside 3.5km is weak as hell if your ship did not have Defensive AA consumable ! Tried to eat some Flak before you start the attack, enemy's Machine cannons will kill your plane before they can drop !! Or more simple, try to strike a ships which have DefAA, your plane will drop like flies !
every time I'am thinking about returning to game but when I see your videos mate... :) it's not good for my mentality 😀 time by time this game becoming more toxic
Deleted it last night after (trying) ranked again. How those people walk and breathe at the same time is a mystery. Was staring at the result screen after an hour of muppetry and thought nope, delete.
@@nigelmilne3503 🤣🤣 can't afford to lose while you make too much things for your team... And so many broken CV's, subs etc. İf you make payment you can have fun 😊 tech tree ships crushed by premium and super ships 😣
Suprised they didn't make it so carriers had point defense systems to shoot down shells comming at them automatically like everything else, anti sub bullshit, anti fire bs too
Been waiting on this video.. new prem carrier.. tier X.. Player who DISPISES CV's... wants to name a clan how they hate CV's.. We all knew the bitchn and complainin was a commin!!
that completely random, totally unrelated coincidence that most effective way to play CV is to cycle one around squad drop. fact that russian cvs are designed this way is totally unrelated, pure chance of random choice
Just Had a Game in a minotour, a so called AA Cruiser with a supposed AA Rating of 98...enemy Malta focused me and I was gone before i even got any enemy ship spotted in my range....
tbh, looks just average, that kremlin pushed too much and was going to survvie if not were for the thunderer spamming he and the cv spamming planes, actually survived so much.
It's because it's mostly being played by more skilled players as they're the most invested to spend doubloons on it, the stats will likely go down when it's been available for coal for a few months, still going to be strong as a T10 CV.
@@booblizard104 True Big Booba Bowser, it will go down when it will be avalaible for Coal. But it will mentain some of this performance, watching it feels like an consistent MvR, and it kinda scares me.
The Hindenburg went from full health to less than half of citadel (unhealable) damage in 1 strike. Those planes have the ability to strike 3 times each.
@@killjoy5535 tbf I can blap a Hindenburg in a BB from like 15-20km with some aiming aswell ^^ Sure CVs are annoying but I guess every class can be annoying aswell ^^
@@killjoy5535 have you have seen a Nakhimov smack a hindi with his skip bombers? ain't pretty... this ship has some teeth but it is a long way from soviet style op
Malta need anerf on ap bombs, they hit way too hard. Got recked in 2 volley on my grober at a end of a game tonight. -30k in 2 volleys. Damn. Cannot dodge or do anything against this shit.
@@jean-philippemorin1176 Ah you meant that ship. Yeah Malta can hit really hard but tbf I find the Torps quite bad with these drop angles so I guess there is atleast a compensation for that in her Bombers. But Großer Kurfürst has extreme weaknesses against AP in my opinion. You may get citadelled rarely but you eat full pens every time and with these bad gun angles you can't really angle without loosing your rear turrets firepower. I still like GK but it's not that good against all these new ships
GK takes a lot of damage from all CV frankly in my GK any attack from a Nakhimov is usually especially character building as they get a full drop off before they lose any planes... I know you want to nerf all CV, but if they nerf the malta's ap it won't be worth buying
its a bs ship. I was in one against another malta with my gearing and it spotted me in 40 seconds and killed me in 1 minute, no matter what I did to run, smoke, hide. didn't get one shot off.
I still watch your videos because your one of my favorite content creators for wows but I don't play anymore because game is trash. But I will still watch because one your a good creator but secondly I like seeing how wargaming keeps destroying there game for there excuse given because it's all about diversity lol.
well that amount of damage for a tier 11 ships isn't that "bad". I mean 176k in a tier 11 cruiser is a good result, why should the tier 11 CV do any less? However those Hindenburg penetrations are quite scary.
@@plasot Battle performance or battle impact? In this specific game, Trenlass hasn't impacted the game that much, he killed the Yamato, which is like free damage in most cases anyway, almost nuked Hindy and took a third of hp from Zao and Bourgonne. Yes he did 170k damage to them, but its like expected from a player of his caliber to do those figures on a tier 11 ship, is it not? So particularly this game, in my opinion, is not the best example.
@@plasot Well if you are dealing 50k damage in a tier 8+ cruiser, then your are barely impacting the game at all. For a tier 9-11 cruiser those numbers are quite tragic, unless the majority of this damage came from destroyers. So here is when we go to specific. Your performance in game may be 50r on BBs, then you have little impact. But if those 50k are farmed on DDs, its a massive impact. You get the difference? All in all, as already mentioned, 170k-140k on a tier 11 ships is a good, solid damage, but nothing to brag about, specially for a SU player like Trenlass.
Answer is - how much damage ranks you post game. Apparently in edgy game as this one he was 2nd in his team with "nothing to brag about" so I would rather support Trenlass in his opinion about that ship is OP
Looking forward to this ship! I hoped Malta would be added to the game. Looks promising. 140k seem okish, below normal BB and cruiser damage. Hoping to do 200k + games with her.
second game was 140k btw. I really dont understand how they can add these really dumb ships...
Same bro...
but it is what "the community" asked for.....................
@@donnybrook23 you mean the silent majority hahaha
Money. I think the Malta admiral pack is over £100? Madness.
WG would be under a lot of pressure to add a high tier Brit CV that doesn't s#ck, as the amount of complaints that they would have received about how pathetic Audacious is would be enough to move even WG staff into action, hence the Malta... however, from what you have shown us, I think it is better than Audacious and roughly as strong as Midway / German T10 CVs but not as strong as Rus / Jap T10 CVs or FDR in terms of dpm... i know we all hate CV when playing anything else, but lets put this ship in perspective... it is nothing new in terms of effectiveness and not by the standards of it's peers overpowered, though frankly I fear this will get nerfed because the haters will come out in force to pressure WG to ensure that the Brits do not get a competitive carrier. You got 160-140k games not 250k to 300k games, this isn't overpowered, but like all CVs could be quite irritating to play against in the hands of a good player like yourself.
WG does believe that the imbalance between classes is a feature of WOWS that sets it apart from other games.
I believe that he did not lose any aircraft during the attacks, AA became more and more inoperative. GG for this 1st game
"CVs are fair and balanced"
Wargaming (possibly)
btw ijn will also have a super cv soon. more and more parasite ships like this.
Can't wait to get this for coal.
10:09 priceless
Offspring of a Kaga and Enterprise. Decent HP +speed, a lot of reserves, very low restoration times, consistent bombs good against anything that is not dd or submarine, great torpedoes, decent rockets. What is the weakness supposed to be???
A vulnerabel citadel like other bri'ish CV's have cuz thicc deck armor but horrible belt armor but yeah you ain't gonna reach a scumbag sadly. Even on a sub cuz why not implementing auto ASW if more than half of the cv community has mental disorder to think and breathe at the same time?🤣🤣🤣🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Concealment
Its team, once in a while when you get a bad one. Otherwise no real weakness..
planes and torps are slow, ap dp not good re dd or v Jap / Russ cv due to their heavily armoured decks, rockets have low pen, basically this is an average T10 CV, better than audacious and roughly as strong as Midway / German T10 CVs but not as strong as Rus / Jap T10 CVs or FDR in terms of dpm... i know we all hate CV when playing anything else, but lets put this ship in perspective... it is nothing new in terms of effectiveness
nothing wrong with carrier dmg done, you should be able to spank ships that dont react to planes in coming, problem is AA does nothing
why the first premature drop? do your planes become faster? I don't get it...
Unrelated, but how the F are u supposed to play Shokaku when double uptiered(T8 vs T10)? Those planes melting like ice cream on a summer noon.
Thing is a straight cash grab. Tier X for doubloons. CV at that. Outstanding. I've absolutely already seen my share of whales.
What am im missing?! Why go back to carrier efter just one drop each time? Isnt that a lot of time just wasted flying out new squadrons? Seems like you could have killed a lot of ships with m,ore follow up strikes. Specially in a CV that prints new planes by the seconds.
because in a lot of scenarios you wont get a second drop of and just waste planes
What you do to finish attack so fast ? I mean you start attacking a ship and at once you are returning to CV.
After you attack, you press F and return
The most ridiculous thing is that players in particular servers expect a CV player to work like a flawless individual.. one single mistake and they keep throwing "Noob CV" attribute.. happens in random battle, even if that player did very good job and died in the middle of a fight.
I'm between Malta and Moskva. I'm also almost with almost RB points to get Ohio/Slava. I want good ships for ranked matches, so what you guys recomend me?
I have Marceau, F. Sherman and Yoshino.
Premium only? Vampire would be my pick for RB points (or Ohio). If you have Daring, I would go for Ohio. Slawa is only good once your enemy is bad - Ohio is always good. Regarding Moskwa vs. Malta: Moskwa is prone to get citadeled, but if you play well, it's a good ship with useful equipments. Malta is a CV and because of that, it shouldn't be played. In a ranked CV match the game is massivly dominated by a good CV player. Since CV matches are rather rare in ranked, it's highl likely that you see a good/better CV player but also have to wait long for a match.
Because of that, my pick would be the Moskwa.
Wouldn't get Moskva since Petro is just the better ship in any aspect.
Ohio is better than Slava imo since its more consistent.
If you are not interested in any other coal ship I would just get Malta since it's atleast different than Audacious.
Petro is Moskva+++ but "free to get"
She is more flat, less superstructure, better concealment, better guns...
@@nicz7694 Moskva has better dpm, better deck armor, and a longer duration radar, it's better than Petro just harder to play.
@@doug683 If it's better than Petro depends on playstyle. If you want gun power and Survivability, Petro is the way to go. Deck got a bit nerfed but the overall Survivability is still far better with its Ice breaker, small silhouette, slim citadel, small superstructure and 360 Turrets.
The only downside is the turret Survivability
For T10 ranked matches, the best battleships are Kremlin, sometimes Schlieffen, and Ohio. As for destroyers, you can go with 4 main picks, smaland, marceau, kleber and vampire. If you don't have them, daring and halland will work. As for cruisers, petro or stalin pick one. If you're willing to gamble on the map, DM and Salem are extremely good. Lastly, for CVs you either want Haku, Midway, or Malta. Russian Cvs can get easily spawnsniped, German CVs are too weak against DDs, and Audacious is just bad.
10:08 trenlass calm down dont die pls!! xd *balance*
Kannst du ein aktuelles CV Ranking machen? :)
And of course the aircraft gain invulnerability when they start to attack as well, not one was shot down during attacking.
During missile drop and such yes but if you attack with a large squad the AA will shoot down your remaining planes and not the one's who attack
Brit cv planes are slow but have big health pools so shooting them down without multiple ship AA or a flak hit isn't quick
They not invulnerable !! AA in this game work like this: over 3.5km, your shooting both Flaks and Machine cannons (Continuos damage), inside 3.5km, only Machine cannons !! And as you can imagine, the damage inside 3.5km is weak as hell if your ship did not have Defensive AA consumable !
Tried to eat some Flak before you start the attack, enemy's Machine cannons will kill your plane before they can drop !! Or more simple, try to strike a ships which have DefAA, your plane will drop like flies !
every time I'am thinking about returning to game but when I see your videos mate... :) it's not good for my mentality 😀 time by time this game becoming more toxic
Deleted it last night after (trying) ranked again. How those people walk and breathe at the same time is a mystery. Was staring at the result screen after an hour of muppetry and thought nope, delete.
@@nigelmilne3503 🤣🤣 can't afford to lose while you make too much things for your team... And so many broken CV's, subs etc. İf you make payment you can have fun 😊 tech tree ships crushed by premium and super ships 😣
Audacious really is the most balanced CV in game huh
Crazy how the weakest CV is the only Balanced CV
But i'd argue that MvR is also balanced
@@caa4118 Bearn fighter build is kinda cool too
this youtuber name sounds familiar , is this the dude who only played cv games on his channel back in the rts days
Suprised they didn't make it so carriers had point defense systems to shoot down shells comming at them automatically like everything else, anti sub bullshit, anti fire bs too
Yes Trenlas. If you play CVs you can broke S key
As a CV player this makes me moist. Could be worse though.
That Hindy damage, should be a law against that.
I'm getting the Malta on friday, I'm surprised they add another op aircraft carrier
You were surprised?
Everyone expected WG to release OP carrier
Been waiting on this video.. new prem carrier.. tier X.. Player who DISPISES CV's... wants to name a clan how they hate CV's.. We all knew the bitchn and complainin was a commin!!
that completely random, totally unrelated coincidence that most effective way to play CV is to cycle one around squad drop. fact that russian cvs are designed this way is totally unrelated, pure chance of random choice
Nayy look you got killed! Clearly it's not strong enough!
👏.
Crying about CV ? Nice.... just bOught it =D
Just Had a Game in a minotour, a so called AA Cruiser with a supposed AA Rating of 98...enemy Malta focused me and I was gone before i even got any enemy ship spotted in my range....
201,000 coal with coupon
what a baby lmao
What nation is that?
britain
CV nation
tbh, looks just average, that kremlin pushed too much and was going to survvie if not were for the thunderer spamming he and the cv spamming planes, actually survived so much.
I havent played for almost a month. After watching this, I didn't feel any compulsion to play.
when they fix dropping trops from high shy not explode immediately 😂😂😂
I did my research, Malta has by biggest dmg output from all t10 CVs, somehow players have more average dmg then FD R, niaaaaniiiiii????!!!
It's because it's mostly being played by more skilled players as they're the most invested to spend doubloons on it, the stats will likely go down when it's been available for coal for a few months, still going to be strong as a T10 CV.
@@booblizard104 True Big Booba Bowser, it will go down when it will be avalaible for Coal. But it will mentain some of this performance, watching it feels like an consistent MvR, and it kinda scares me.
Reasons I no longer play WOWS...
definately not the same ship on any account.
the aa just dont want to hit you on attacking.
so unfair hidden buffs made by wargaming.
Can not agree that it is overpowered. Elite playes don't like anything that can kill them.
The Hindenburg went from full health to less than half of citadel (unhealable) damage in 1 strike. Those planes have the ability to strike 3 times each.
@@killjoy5535 tbf I can blap a Hindenburg in a BB from like 15-20km with some aiming aswell ^^
Sure CVs are annoying but I guess every class can be annoying aswell ^^
@@killjoy5535 have you have seen a Nakhimov smack a hindi with his skip bombers? ain't pretty... this ship has some teeth but it is a long way from soviet style op
Malta need anerf on ap bombs, they hit way too hard. Got recked in 2 volley on my grober at a end of a game tonight. -30k in 2 volleys. Damn. Cannot dodge or do anything against this shit.
What is a grober?
@@nicz7694 german bb grober kurfurst
@@jean-philippemorin1176 Ah you meant that ship.
Yeah Malta can hit really hard but tbf I find the Torps quite bad with these drop angles so I guess there is atleast a compensation for that in her Bombers.
But Großer Kurfürst has extreme weaknesses against AP in my opinion. You may get citadelled rarely but you eat full pens every time and with these bad gun angles you can't really angle without loosing your rear turrets firepower.
I still like GK but it's not that good against all these new ships
GK takes a lot of damage from all CV frankly in my GK any attack from a Nakhimov is usually especially character building as they get a full drop off before they lose any planes... I know you want to nerf all CV, but if they nerf the malta's ap it won't be worth buying
Another op carrier. They are all op. So glad i quit
its a bs ship. I was in one against another malta with my gearing and it spotted me in 40 seconds and killed me in 1 minute, no matter what I did to run, smoke, hide. didn't get one shot off.
Enemy carrier was right there and you turned around and bomb something else. You're terrible at this game.
funny that you say it, but these bombs cant pen its deck :) that why I didnt go for him, if you want to insult someone atleast use a valid argument :)
All kinds of broken shit in game no one bats an eye and runs to it giggling a CV everyone loses their mind
I still watch your videos because your one of my favorite content creators for wows but I don't play anymore because game is trash. But I will still watch because one your a good creator but secondly I like seeing how wargaming keeps destroying there game for there excuse given because it's all about diversity lol.
well that amount of damage for a tier 11 ships isn't that "bad". I mean 176k in a tier 11 cruiser is a good result, why should the tier 11 CV do any less? However those Hindenburg penetrations are quite scary.
On battle performance CVs are lot higher that BB's & CL/CA's (second best are DD's).
@@plasot Battle performance or battle impact? In this specific game, Trenlass hasn't impacted the game that much, he killed the Yamato, which is like free damage in most cases anyway, almost nuked Hindy and took a third of hp from Zao and Bourgonne. Yes he did 170k damage to them, but its like expected from a player of his caliber to do those figures on a tier 11 ship, is it not? So particularly this game, in my opinion, is not the best example.
@@arsk5127 Did not impacted and still grabbed over 140 k of damage. Well, when I'm not impacting game I can count on 50 k in BB or cruiser.
@@plasot Well if you are dealing 50k damage in a tier 8+ cruiser, then your are barely impacting the game at all. For a tier 9-11 cruiser those numbers are quite tragic, unless the majority of this damage came from destroyers. So here is when we go to specific. Your performance in game may be 50r on BBs, then you have little impact. But if those 50k are farmed on DDs, its a massive impact. You get the difference? All in all, as already mentioned, 170k-140k on a tier 11 ships is a good, solid damage, but nothing to brag about, specially for a SU player like Trenlass.
Answer is - how much damage ranks you post game. Apparently in edgy game as this one he was 2nd in his team with "nothing to brag about" so I would rather support Trenlass in his opinion about that ship is OP
Looking forward to this ship! I hoped Malta would be added to the game. Looks promising. 140k seem okish, below normal BB and cruiser damage. Hoping to do 200k + games with her.
This was his second game in it. 140k is great. You're comparing your absolute best games to his 2nd game in the ship.