First time he went to jungle that's bcoz of keeping his father's promise, so he moved out. This time being a king he can't run away from duties and responsibilities. He is not like us who are just self centered beings. That's why that avatar suffered to show people that, no matter what in life Dharma has to be uplifted
Ramayana is the saddest story in history, it is full of sadness, separation, sacrifice, loss of kinghood, loss of wife, loss of father, loss of sons etc full of sacrifices and compromises , all ONLY because it was the right and examplery thing to do - the best example of dharma and karma a human can do, a father can do, a son can do, a king can do, a husband can do, always for righteousness, no matter how hard, how sad how heart breaking it may be, he controlled his senses and did the right thing, that why Rama is worshipped as God, no human can do such deeds and loose so much...
Guru Gobind Singh ji had similar story of loss. His little sons were sacrificed. I have heard he was Surya bansi, so somewhere from Sri Rams family tree.
No no no you are learning the different version of ramayan No one is perfect in the world Agnipariksha and sita banishment is fake These stories are created to destroy the glory of lord ram Actually there are many different versions of ramayan some people tell agnipariksha never happened Some people will say agnipariksha happened to prove sita mata character Some people get angry on this agnipariksha concept See agnipariksha never happened I read all concepts I read the untold story of sita mata this book is amazing A thousand seeds of joy Agnipariksha never happened
I think it's important for the current generation to actually read Valmiki Ramayana and then ask questions..It's just heart wrenching what Rama went through.One should also understand why there was a Ramavatara.
Agniparishka never happened You have to go through meditation Kindly read a thousand seeds of joy In that book gidess lakshmi tells about the Agniparishka concept Agniparishka never happened She tells this thing to a devotee
You would want a king like that but you wouldn't want your daughter to marry a man like him, knowing that her life will hold little value in camparision to this kingdom.
With all due respect Duryodhana was at fault and had committed crimes whilst Sita was innocent and punished for no fault of her own . Nor was she given any explanation as to why she was left in the jungle. No doubt Lord Rama was an exemplary ruler and loving husband and he remained equanimous throughout all the storms life threw at him. This situation could have been handled differently and logically . He could have upheld his trust in his own wife on a public platform and opened up a path for his subjects to follow and look into.
dude you have sort of half cooked knowledge ....real Sita wasn't there when Raavan abducted her it was Sita Saaya or a sort of doppelganger . Sometime in initial days of vaanvas Ram gave sita to Aagni dev to be protected and took Sita maa Saya with him and when he freed Sita maa from Raavan . Sita gave Aagni Pariksha and Ram got real Sita from Aagni dev to him .
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
@ojasgirdhar7049; Girdharji, Satyemeva Jayete, Sri Ram, as a person with feelings, did no wrong, but it does not elevate him worthy of worship as an avatar of Vishnu. He, in Rage and revenge, murdered Ravan and Khumbhkaran for Sita haran with the help of Hanumanji, a flying monkey with a flaming tail, failed to pluck out the shrubs growing on the parvat, yet it broke apart the parvat. LOL, Hanumanji flew across Bharath carrying the parvat like an airplane to light a fire to Lanka to burn its inhabitants, including women and children, committing the World's first GENOCIDE for KATIL Ram. Aeronautically and biologically, JHOOT and bakwas. Giridhanji, The pivotal Hindu dharm granth, Bhagwat Gita, claims to contain the verbal discourse Krishna supposedly gave Arjun during the Mahabharath war between the Pandavas and their cousins, 100 Kauravas, sons of ONE couple, blind Dhritarashtra and Gsndhari, which is biologically and statistically JHOOT and BAKWAS. Girdharji, FYI, Sri Krishna was born in 3228 BCE,>2000 years after the Mahabharath war of 5561 BCE. The TALES of Krishna assisting Arjun as his charioteer while verbally narrating Bhagwat Gita is the TAIL of LIES/ JHOOT/ MITHYA. Facts lead to the truth missing in Hinduism/Sanatan dharm.
@@thehunterthehunter5447don't agree this man talk about sita exile.If anyone raped one girl .she is not criminal but she is victim. People Don't rights to blame victim. Ram also don't have any rights to gave agni pariksha. Ravan kidnap sita without her permission. So chances more he rape without her permission . This is very wrong . God test victim .it is right. Next I came to this man point . Ram send sita to valmiki ( brother)ashramThen what is this reason know only ram sita people talking rumors about sita .after this incident people strongly in her accusations about sita . Many more bad things spread about sita . Ram make sita is criminal infront of society. People believe ram Is incarnation ofKing ram is lord . Lord can do any injustice for any living organisms. So ram give extra sorrow for sita and inborn twins ( lava, kusa) . He spoiled child dignity .Next valmiki original name is ratnakar .actually he is theif before see ram and after see ram .he is devotee of her and ram give the name valmiki to her. Later period he wrote ramayan .he not brother of seetha ok. She is daughter of bhooma devi . ram didn't accept sita and her child still during last period ofshe living in this world she call her mother ( booma devi) and go with her . She proved her virgin the way of suicide. The reason is ram don't accept her child because of their political image.suppose he sent to brother home why he can't accept her child and she go her mother womb .next question is why luv and kush fight for ram action (sita exile) to ram and his brothers . Ram don't know her child or see her child after sitas delivery . Suppose he sent to her brother home then why he don't know who is her child .onematter is Clearly know ram give punishment to sita .not send her brothers house ok . If he save from people accusation then why he didnt sent sita to mithila *( mother home of sita ) that is palace all facilities in there but valmiki asram nothing equal to mithila . So don't hear this interviewer words please think this types of ways . ram all did for sita is save their own image from people. Or her prestige . He did for some in dhobhi wife. Dhobhi is not king of any kingdom. So it is not raj dharma also . Sugriva wife also kidnapped by vaali but he doesn't doubted his wife and he accepted his wife and he don't gave agni pariksha to hear rumor of people. Sugriva also king of one place. He has also have raj dharma ok.
Vishnu was cursed by Vrinda for tricking her so Shiva can kill Jalandhar. She said in one lifetime he will also live without his beloved wife/ partner like she is now without her partner. So Vishnu as Ram fulfilled her curse by living without Sita. Ram never married . He loved Sita only . He lived till end without the love of his life. Vishnu and Shiva doesn’t care what these people think. They performed their duties. Karma is bigger than anything even Gods are bound with laws of Karma.
when rama was sent on exil, there was no expectations on Sita to follow him in the Jungle and go through all the things she went through. HOWEVER, WHEN THERE WAS AGNIPARIKSHA she sat alone on it. He was not a good husband and i agree to the young man when he says he had to showoff to his people. often when i take darshan at temples and come across Ram and Sita. i always pray to Sita to give me the strength to lead in life by my choice and if ever i come across a Rama as compagnon make sure i leave his side if ever he leaves me on the "agnipariksha". EVERYBODY PRAISE RAMA but they omit and deny to give the due respect to Sita SHE WAS A PRINCESS IN HER FATHER'S LAND. HE DEFINETLY WAS NOT A GOOD HUSBAND AS HE LEFT HIS WIFE SIDE WHEN SHE WAS PUT AT TEST while she was a good wife by walking at his side on his exile - and yes he had a choice since Bharat was ruling in his absence HE JUST TOOK HIS WIFE FOR GRANTED and it was not him to send Sita to the forest she left with respect and never turned back even when Ram came to visit luv and kush and requested her to come back she refused
After he sent her away, he provided her with nothing, was she sent any helpers, knowing that she is pregnant, he did it for his people's sake, he should have left her where she was instead of taking her to one hell to another, at least she had 2 sons, without a dad, sounds like the typical men of today
What do you want from modi ??? He is elected to serve the nation ... You want him to put his self interest first(self interest in narrow sense)??? Are you a brainless idiot??? For a good king his people is the first thing,....and how do you know that Sita was all alone in jungle??? He is the king he might have someone to look after her ....just don't look for assumption.. this is not your motherfucking small family... Even to do household task you keep fighting with your husband/wife and you are judging Ram who has to look after his kingdom??? For any king his son comes first but for a good king his people comes first ... because there are people so he is a king .... That means you will sacrifice entire Kingdom who made you king for your self interest??? Your self interest is very narrow,,,is not it?? For a king his self interest is his kingdom his self interest is broader , for selfish people his/her self interest is his/her wife, his/her children ,his/her wealthy life, his /her standard of living....your self interest might be exclusive but for a king his self interest is inclusive,he has to work for the people.... And this is not your family with 4-5 people he has to run a kingdom with millions of people....he has his dilemma between his self interest in broader sense (which is his kingdom) vs self interest in narrow sense (which is his beloved wife and son who will be the next king)
@mihirkeesra508; Mihirji, Satyemeva Jayete, I hope you are not visually blind, then open your mind to Ram's friend, Hanuman was a monkey that could not fly as it had No wings, nor could light a fire with its flaming tail as it would have roasted Hanuman ready by lunch. Ram could have been the son of Dashrath Maharaj, but because of Hanuman, a flying monkey with a flaming tail, Ramayan is a mythology. Mihirji Bhagwat Gita, the pivotal Hindy dharm granth, is claimed to contain the verbal discourse Krishna supposedly gave Arjun during the Mahabharath war between the Pandavas and the 1000 Kauravas in 5561BCE. Mihirji, Sr Krishana was born in 3228 BCE, >2000 years AFTER the mahabharath war of 5561. TALES of Krishna assisting Arjun as his charioteer while giving verbal discourse is the TAIL of LIES/ JHOOT/ MITHYA. Kauravas being 100 sons of blind Dhritarashtra and Gandhari biologically and statistically FALSE and ABSURD. Facts lead to the truth, and the truth shall set you free, Not Hindu mythological tales. Use common sense, discard mythological Hinduism/ Sanatan dharm, and replace it with worshiping a loving and jivit Parmeshwar.
Bharath was ruling the kingdom before Ram returned, if ram had given the throne to bharath, he could have lived with his wife happily and would not have heard such disturbing things about Sita maiya.
He's saying that Ram left sita because his people don't like a woman who has been with another man for a long time. But everybody knows that only for the sake of his ego that evil man kept a goddess like sita in his custody. The thing is that, then why did Ram gone so far to bring her back? Only to leave pregnant women in the jungle who always loved him and never given a chance for another man in her heart. Just to please some people. It felt very bad.
@@brisingr12 don't agree this man talk about sita exile.If anyone raped one girl .she is not criminal but she is victim. People Don't rights to blame victim. Ram also don't have any rights to gave agni pariksha. Ravan kidnap sita without her permission. So chances more he rape without her permission . This is very wrong . God test victim .it is right. Next I came to this man point . Ram send sita to valmiki ( brother)ashramThen what is this reason know only ram sita people talking rumors about sita .after this incident people strongly in her accusations about sita . Many more bad things spread about sita . Ram make sita is criminal infront of society. People believe ram Is incarnation ofKing ram is lord . Lord can do any injustice for any living organisms. So ram give extra sorrow for sita and inborn twins ( lava, kusa) . He spoiled child dignity .Next valmiki original name is ratnakar .actually he is theif before see ram and after see ram .he is devotee of her and ram give the name valmiki to her. Later period he wrote ramayan .he not brother of seetha ok. She is daughter of bhooma devi . ram didn't accept sita and her child still during last period ofshe living in this world she call her mother ( booma devi) and go with her . She proved her virgin the way of suicide. The reason is ram don't accept her child because of their political image.suppose he sent to brother home why he can't accept her child and she go her mother womb .next question is why luv and kush fight for ram action (sita exile) to ram and his brothers . Ram don't know her child or see her child after sitas delivery . Suppose he sent to her brother home then why he don't know who is her child .onematter is Clearly know ram give punishment to sita .not send her brothers house ok . If he save from people accusation then why he didnt sent sita to mithila *( mother home of sita ) that is palace all facilities in there but valmiki asram nothing equal to mithila . So don't hear this interviewer words please think this types of ways . ram all did for sita is save their own image from people. Or her prestige . He did for some in dhobhi wife. Dhobhi is not king of any kingdom. So it is not raj dharma also . Sugriva wife also kidnapped by vaali but he doesn't doubted his wife and he accepted his wife and he don't gave agni pariksha to hear rumor of people. Sugriva also king of one place. He has also have raj dharma ok.
What most people don't know that he did not just leave Sita in the forest while she was pregnant, he left her at an ashram which belonged to Sita's brother and he wanted people to stop questioning Sita's character but he still wanted to continue his duty as a king
Why would they care about Sita ji? I am beginning to think that he brought back Sita ji not for her but for his pride , because even today if my wife is taken away by another man, i must need to bring her back to save my pride
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
The life of Lord Ram is a lesson for all of us... It's a simple theory of karmic cycle... Lord Ram asked Mata Sita to leave the kingdom for the sake of his obligation to uphold the law of his land... In his next incarnation he didn't get to be with the woman whom he loved with all his heart... His kingdom was destroyed...He couldn't get to live with his original parents... His complete life was a tragedy... So it's a lesson that when it comes to karma even the supreme personality is also not forgiven we are just mere human beings so we should say and do things which won't hurt us in future when they come back at us
No wonder women have to fight their own battle after being royal n going with ram in exile for 14 yrs she is thrown in fire infront of him is it justified
I think shri Rama is a person who should be idol for everyone. HOWEVER IN MY OPINION AGNIPARIKSHA CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED. That era was of King and kingdom.... today we have government and people. My countering question for sadhguru ji remarks at 1:31 is that ordinary people even today says that girls are also in fault when rape happens, many says that those girl are of not good character or they are not wearing proper cloths etc so should our government should also punish rape victim girl just because ordinary people think so (just like shri ram punished sita mata). I can not agree with it and I can not agree with agnipariksha. AGAIN NO DISRESPECT TO RAMJI. HE MUST HAVE DONE TRILLIONS OF GOOD DEEDS. I JUST THINK AGNI PARIKSHA AINT ONE OF THEM
What is the question of her character? She was kidnapped. How can you tell someone to prove her character if she was kidnapped?? She did not go with someone by choice. Even gor the kingdom sake this action was unfair, unfair to ladies in Kingdom and future generations, that if a man kidnap a lady then her family should abandon her blaming her character?? This action was not right for the people of Kingdom also because in people of Kingdom there are women too. We have to respect our Lord Ram for so many things but also we have to accept that this action was unfair.
It is mentioned in Valmiki Ramayana. He said he did all because of Kul Pratishtha. Please read Ramayana. Problem is no body read Ramayana and just provide comments.
Sadguru is just glorifying Rama, I mean it's okay to accept whatever it is. The questions were legit and today's life this explanation does match at all. Forget for a moment Rama as a persona nd consider him doing the same thing today to his wife, how many people will support this? Kuch b
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
@@atharalimaan8509have you ever read the original valmiki ramayan ?? Or r u just passing judgements based on a vedio clip ? Sita never gave Agni pariksha , its not mentioned in Valmiki Ramayan. Plzz read your original scriptures before passing comments on something hypothetical.
Actually, it is not that comparable today because we don't have Kings anymore. But few centuries earlier we can draw comparisons. A kings duty is first as a King and then any personal relationships. And it should always be that way, because the security of his citizens and kingdom depends on it. Now in democracy we can elect someone else, then it wasn't the case. Eg, If Prithviraj Chauhan didn't have a beef with his cousin, he wouldn't have been betrayed and maybe not have lost his kingdom. If Maharana Pratap would have taken his role as a family man first, he would have never allowed his children to live in some forest with no security instead of a palace with the luxery a royal would enjoy. But his duty to his Kingdom came first. Even today, a soldier is a soldier first, a son second. Or else he would always choose a different career especially if he is an only child. Am I saying Sita should have been punished? No!! But Rama's intension were not of someone who thought of his wife as an object, but a King who made a personal sacrifice for his Kingdom.
@@geisha-1212don't agree this man talk about sita exile.If anyone raped one girl .she is not criminal but she is victim. People Don't rights to blame victim. Ram also don't have any rights to gave agni pariksha. Ravan kidnap sita without her permission. So chances more he rape without her permission . This is very wrong . God test victim .it is right. Next I came to this man point . Ram send sita to valmiki ( brother)ashramThen what is this reason know only ram sita people talking rumors about sita .after this incident people strongly in her accusations about sita . Many more bad things spread about sita . Ram make sita is criminal infront of society. People believe ram Is incarnation ofKing ram is lord . Lord can do any injustice for any living organisms. So ram give extra sorrow for sita and inborn twins ( lava, kusa) . He spoiled child dignity .Next valmiki original name is ratnakar .actually he is theif before see ram and after see ram .he is devotee of her and ram give the name valmiki to her. Later period he wrote ramayan .he not brother of seetha ok. She is daughter of bhooma devi . ram didn't accept sita and her child still during last period ofshe living in this world she call her mother ( booma devi) and go with her . She proved her virgin the way of suicide. The reason is ram don't accept her child because of their political image.suppose he sent to brother home why he can't accept her child and she go her mother womb .next question is why luv and kush fight for ram action (sita exile) to ram and his brothers . Ram don't know her child or see her child after sitas delivery . Suppose he sent to her brother home then why he don't know who is her child .onematter is Clearly know ram give punishment to sita .not send her brothers house ok . If he save from people accusation then why he didnt sent sita to mithila *( mother home of sita ) that is palace all facilities in there but valmiki asram nothing equal to mithila . So don't hear this interviewer words please think this types of ways . ram all did for sita is save their own image from people. Or her prestige . He did for some in dhobhi wife. Dhobhi is not king of any kingdom. So it is not raj dharma also . Sugriva wife also kidnapped by vaali but he doesn't doubted his wife and he accepted his wife and he don't gave agni pariksha to hear rumor of people. Sugriva also king of one place. He has also have raj dharma ok.
@@kavitharamesh8384tell this nonsense in your missionary halls as a individual Lord Ram doesn't have any right to give Agni Pariksha to Sita but as a future king and Sita the future queen of Ayodhya it is his duty to show his people that he and his wife are pure , go and read Ramayan properly where Shri Ram clearly tells that I want to show Sita the queen of Ayodhya is pure to all worlds here no one is testing the victim and also please learn that if Rama really doubt sita why would he accept luva and kusha he would easily abundant three of them and marry another woman and also you should know that during the ashwamedha yaga he placed Golden statue of Sita(as wife presence is compulsory) this clearly shows his devotion towards his wife ,dhobi is not king of any Kingdom but you should know that Dhobi is the citizen of Ayodhya and kings Prime duty is to bound to his citizens (you will understand when you consider role of a king as a responsibility instead of authority), yes Sugriv wife is also with Vali and Sugriv is a king but you should know Sugriv is Vanar and Vanar public dosent mean this issue pls read Ramayan properly
We worship Shri Ram...but is that really justified ki.. ek pregnant women ko sacrifice krdya??? Wo khud se apne baccho ko paali...is that true?? If yes toh kya sekhna chahiye Hume???
@@vivekjaiswal6733 is it justified for old person to marry teenager? Is it justified for only men to rule and women to cook? Is it justified for people of one caste to not touch other? Is it justified to believe in superstitions? All these things happened in old eras irrespective of justified or not
The point here is men always considered women as a thing In Ramayan One person Ravan kept sita to proof her power Second person Ram ask her to go away in pregnant condition Why didn't they do DNA test that time itself to proof who's kids they were Why only women needs to provide proof , did anyone ask Ram , if he had done something with other female during his vanvas , it is because only women have got something for being pregnant there is no proof for men to show up the same thing If nobody knows anything why we are workshiped him How can we say , the same guru is saying in last all is written only , there is no proof for that too.
As a king when he heard the rumor at least he would've asked the responsible oerson tonout out her statement amd verdict is delivered rather in court than not in midnight silently...
He could have renounced the throne to his brother Bharat who by the looks of it would have made a good king too. At the end of the day maybe it's about priorities in his role as a king and husband and he assumed that of the former 🤷🏻♀️
Budha Not left his family, after getting enlightenment. he came back and met them and considered them as disciples and later those followed the same practice to spread peace and love in public
The dobby who passed comment on mother seetha was born as Tasagan during Sri krishna times. Sri krishna bangs him to down to earth. Do karma plays role in sri rama times. The hunch back lady in ramayan, comes as kubja in sri krishna Time.
I don't see any contradiction here King and Queen should be acceptable to common people people rejected sita as they thought she lived with other man for 14 years, obviously in those days future heirs of the throne will have some suspicion which is not good for Kingdom, Ram also wanted to renounce and go with Sita however none of the brothers or nobles allowed that hence he chose raj dharma over vyakti dharma, for the love of sita he never remarried even though he was pressurized since it was his personal choice. Some kind of Validation of heirs in terms of looks and prowess was needed which happened after lav and kush were born during aswamedha hence he accepted and annointed them this is all very clearly raj dharma King is always and always answerable to people period
still it was too much to send a pregnant woman to jungle that is after she proved her purity through agnipariksha. she was his responsibility and i do not think there any thing to do with praja if lord Rama to marry Sita or not i mean in that era there kings who had many wifes, and after considering the fact Sita had to go through agni pariksha to prove her purity and pass it and still be sent to jungle because of fellow citizen, i dont think it is justified in any way, i dont want to sound bad but i think people should not be biased in this topic i mean Lord Rama was a great person but still i think he failed in this part. and also Sita was also Lord Rama praja after marrying her. so failed to give his citizen justice too i guess, i know will be getting many hate comments, correct me if am wrong in any thing or you want to share your perspective, if you being biased and replyig you lost your stand .
i agree.. but we need to understand that ramayan is not a story of god. its a story of a human whom we see as a god due to his idealistic character in that time period which is some thousand years back. Did you watch the anime naruto ? if u did remember itachi. None of us blamed him for killing his own clan for the sake of konoha. We see his pain and understood the circumstances and hence refer him as "god itachi ". We should understand the circumstances due to which rama did what he did .Rama is a human and when his life ended he carried some achievemnts ( like being a righteous leader ) some hardships ( like battle with ravana for sita ) some guilts and failures ( like sita agnipariksha , and sending her to jungle , killing vali etc ) . when we look into his story isnt it how our human lives are ? we face situations where we need to take hard decisions even when it pains us deeply? we struggle to satisfy and give justice to everyone.he is a human may be he made mistakes.. lets know the story of a great king who once lived on this earth... he might be flawed just like everyone of us..but still he is something.
@@that__thing7417 I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAID , I AM FULLY AWARE THAT IN BOTH THE CASES FOR ITACHI AND LORD RAMA, THE PURPOSE FOR THEIR DEED WAS NOBLE BUT THE WAY WAS WRONG, EVEN THOUGH IT MAY BE THE ONLY OPTION , A WRONG DEED IS A WRONG DEED, I DON'T THINK LORD RAMA OR ITACHI WOULD JUSTIFY THEMSELF BY THINKING THE WAY TO DO IT WAS RIGHT, THEY BOTH KNEW IT WAS A WRONG PATH TO TAKE , I MEAN THEY WERE DOING SOMETHING BAD TO THEIR LOVED ONES, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS NECESSARY. MY POINT WAS THAT HE FAILED IN THIS PART. AND LORD RAMA WAS THE AVATAR OF LORD VISHNU, HE IS TYPICALLY A GOD
@@warriortayang4515 ya he failed thts is my point too.. and yeah rama is an avatar of vishnu ... but rama is not a god he is human. he told this himself that he came to earth to live as human and die as human and experienced joy and sorrow just like any other human being. just for ur reference ... yudhksnd Sarg 117, Shloka 11 "आत्मानं मानुषं मन्ये रामं दशरथात्मजम् " rama said these himself that he is a human I mean.. he is god before the avatar and after the avatar but during the avatar he is a human.
@@that__thing7417 LORD RAMA IS A GREAT KING INDEED , THERE IS NO QUESTION ABOUT IT BUT MA SITA WAS HIS LOVE HIS LIFE , HOW CAN HE DO IT, HE IS THE KING AND I MEAN MA SITA LITERALLY STOOD FOR LORD RAMA , SHE LEFT HER KINGDOM AND SPEND HER LIFE IN JUNGLE EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS A PRINCESS. SHE DID WRONG TO MA SITA. AND IT WAS WRONG.
@@warriortayang4515 he didnt leave her some where in the jungle to live her own life. he kept her at valmiki maharshi ashram who is equivalent to her brother. By doing this he 1) erased the negativity on sita. Bro just think.. ramayan happend thousands of years back and till today no one is blaming sita everyone blamed rama for leaving her . That is exactly what ram wanted. he shifted the negativity towards him and it worked till date. I didnt see this kind of supreme love. If he didnt do it that way some way or other some random guy some idiot in the present world would have said " sita is wd some stranger and ram kept her wd him again " for sure. But ram didnt want even the slightest negativity over his pyaar sita 2) re established the trust in people. Those days a king is meant to be a person who had no blackmark.( unlike the politician now 🥲). Its soo important for a king to keep his people trust as a priority . We have to understand that.
Uttarakhand is not a part of Valmiki Ramayana which is called the original source of it... And it is mentioned in Ramcharitmanas that Sita Maa gave Agnipariksha to get her real form back... The Sita Maa that was abducted by Ravana Was actually Chaya Sita, the real Sita Maa secured herself at Agni Dev's shelter as soon as she realised She was about to be abducted... That's the whole story 🙏❤️ JaiSiyaRamHanumanji 🙏❤️ OmShriParvatiShivayaNamah 🙏❤️
It truly troubles to see that people are questioning the ethics of Bhagwaan Ram.. He is an idealistic king who lives in our hearts, So we worship him.. Thanks to the western people, such ideologies have surfaced...
@@5-june when did u ever see me question Allah or Jesus.. i dont know about them, so i cannot question them.. so stop generalising all hindus.. less than 2% hindus disrespect other religions..
@@gaurangkulkarni4357 Be unbiased for one second and listen, questioning is important, questioning has always been important , because of questioning, analysing and criticising, lot of stupid practices have been abolished be it Sati, Sex slavery , concubines, child marriages ,racism , Misogyny, and the list goes on and on , I know these things are not 100% finished ,but only because of questioning these things have been diminished to minute , Be unbiased for a sec and think, Questioning objectionable things and practices is very important for the advancement of the society in a good direction
Bro ram sent sita to valmiki ashram in forest.. Valmiki is sitas brother....when people in ramrajya called sita badly and blame her and they doesn't want sita to become their queen... Ram decided to leave kingdom with sita and go to forest or giving his brothers the kingdom or another option is sent sita to the forest.. But the brothers don't want to rule the kingdom and also they don't want their brother and brother's wife to go in jungle... Ram asked sita, sita doesn't want ram to lose his kingdom, so she requested ram to kindly hear her opinion she herself go to the Forest without ram.. Ram accepted her request and with tears and then he sent sita to the banks of river near valmiki ashram...here ram did dharma for the people and as a husband... Ram is maryadhapurushothaman... Jai shree ram🙏
Thank you . People need to read Ramayan in detail before questioning. Also it’s not their fault at the same time as Ramayan was summarised and told without reasons. There should be a Ramayan series in detail.
@@thehunterthehunter5447don't agree this man talk about sita exile.If anyone raped one girl .she is not criminal but she is victim. People Don't rights to blame victim. Ram also don't have any rights to gave agni pariksha. Ravan kidnap sita without her permission. So chances more he rape without her permission . This is very wrong . God test victim .it is right. Next I came to this man point . Ram send sita to valmiki ( brother)ashramThen what is this reason know only ram sita people talking rumors about sita .after this incident people strongly in her accusations about sita . Many more bad things spread about sita . Ram make sita is criminal infront of society. People believe ram Is incarnation ofKing ram is lord . Lord can do any injustice for any living organisms. So ram give extra sorrow for sita and inborn twins ( lava, kusa) . He spoiled child dignity .Next valmiki original name is ratnakar .actually he is theif before see ram and after see ram .he is devotee of her and ram give the name valmiki to her. Later period he wrote ramayan .he not brother of seetha ok. She is daughter of bhooma devi . ram didn't accept sita and her child still during last period ofshe living in this world she call her mother ( booma devi) and go with her . She proved her virgin the way of suicide. The reason is ram don't accept her child because of their political image.suppose he sent to brother home why he can't accept her child and she go her mother womb .next question is why luv and kush fight for ram action (sita exile) to ram and his brothers . Ram don't know her child or see her child after sitas delivery . Suppose he sent to her brother home then why he don't know who is her child .onematter is Clearly know ram give punishment to sita .not send her brothers house ok . If he save from people accusation then why he didnt sent sita to mithila *( mother home of sita ) that is palace all facilities in there but valmiki asram nothing equal to mithila . So don't hear this interviewer words please think this types of ways . ram all did for sita is save their own image from people. Or her prestige . He did for some in dhobhi wife. Dhobhi is not king of any kingdom. So it is not raj dharma also . Sugriva wife also kidnapped by vaali but he doesn't doubted his wife and he accepted his wife and he don't gave agni pariksha to hear rumor of people. Sugriva also king of one place. He has also have raj dharma ok.
No. no the king should be openly give punishment. Sita is the countrys praja. The king should give punishment after the culprits statement. And the guilty should be must be proved Without any proof how can a king give judgement as per his wish.
Can I Say plz ''This is a ritual Matalab ek taraf se agni agniparikhsha jaruri thi isliye sita mata ne kiya That doesn't mean that ram ji doesn't believe in Siya He belives in Siya So that he tested sita for agnipariksha Or jab sab Sita mata ke khilaf the One Sadhu tell to ram ji ki Dil se socho wah kya kehta hai So, Ram ji ka dil janta tha sita aisa nhi kar sakti Lekin sita ne samjaj ke liye ram ji ko chod ke chli gyi because sab sochte na ki ram ji ne aabhi bhi sita ko apne paas rakha hai samjaj ke belive ke liye ram ji ne sita ko swear lene ko kaha lekin sita ko laga ki ram ji ko Vishvas nhi hai isliye wah dharti mata ke paas chli gyi But....... Ram ji ne chodha todhi na unhone kya kya karne par gussa huye ki main puri duniya ko kuch kar dunga lekin Jo other god the undone ram ji ko samjhaya ki next janm mein sita hi aapki Patni hogi Example:vishnu lakshmi to Unka gussa shant hua or luv kush ke sath rhe That's why hameine suna hi hai ki saccha prem Har Janmashtami ke liye hota hai dusre janm mekn mil gye ❤❤ Siya pati Ram chadr ji ki jay To unko bishwas tha❤Never say that unko nahi tha
People talk of jungle? Mahrishi Valmiki's ashram was in the jungle like vana (वन).... Nowadays , people go on vacation and find solace in a nature stay. Why can't your imagination reach that level. In the dialog in the cart with Lakshmana, Sita herself declares her love for jungle and her desire to go to jungle when she was pregnant. Ram sends her to Valmiki's ashram thinking of her state and what best could be done at that moment. When have you all become so great to find the god's mistake? And the era is Ramayana- Treta yug which was approx. some 8000-10000 yrs back. May god bless you all.
Let me ask u something, sita was prisoned by ravan for 14 years and after whole these years she didn't even let ravana to took her purity and ram rescued her and tested her to know if she's pure or not just imagin a women waited for her whole life for her man and he doubted u imagine how mentally traumatized she is and he even proceed to abandone her after getting pregnent how crual u can be huh how can a wife live without her husband all this time sita was the one suffered not ram he is the worst human ever existed
king dassrath promises crowning of rama. He fails. He sends rama to forest. Dasarath kills a boy of disabled parents, and curse goes that he will die due to his son. So things go like that to maintain dharma. So to maintain dharma, once mother seetha tested on fire, rama has no right to punish her. So she goes into earth leaving rama
Sadhguru Maharaj , There is something to add about KARMA . 1 . When Sita was a young teenager , 2 parrots came to visit her . They died . One of them was reborn as the Dhobi of Ayodhya . 2 . A golden deer caught her fancy ! She was yet to overcome lust and greed . 3 . Lakshman Rekha is a symbol of obedience and discipline , the trespass unwarranted . 🙏🇮🇳🙏.
Just ask the guy if the guy next to him steals his girlfriend and keeps for a decade and then the audience questions him fighting for her bringing her back, what he would do to set an example.
Those who don't have read any literature and how different things used to happen in different times in human civilization are asking stupid questions comparing from this times.
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
No one are perfect in the world Respect everyone But I can say from my heart My lord ram and sita mata never done agnipariksha I love lord ram a lot Some people tell spirtual stories Some people support lord ram he is a king it's his duty to obey people Some people get angry on lord ram actions They keep on judging lord ram On basis of agnipariksha No on basis of UA-cam and media that's all See if billions of people believe in agnipariksha or sita mata banishment I read many comments I watched many serials Nowadays UA-cam is the best book I watched many youtubers discussing about lord rams agnipariksha some people tell lakshmanarekha is also fake Some people tell uttar ramayan is fake Some people say no uttar ramayan is part of valmiki ramayan only Who is correct Then you have to go through meditation I read a thousand seeds of joy Godess Lakshmi and Godess Saraswati Teachings In that the author also ask to godess Lakshmi did you went through fire test No I repeat again no there is only love no fire test Did ram leave you She explains all doubts all mysteries about ramayan And in the untold story of sita mata In that book also actual ramayan story is different After ravan death When sita mata see lord ram fire comes out of her body which is her power So godess Lakshmi explains people and authors misunderstood about this concept and created agnipariksha story Even Author tulsidas he is none other than sage valmiki Even he mentioned agnipariksha concept But what I read he forgetted some of his previous incarnation incidents and moments In the untold of sita Ravan used to give bad dreams for sita mata then godess Parvati mata comes and rescue sita mata Please do meditation on lord ram that's all I will take care of you After ravan death Lord ram thought to heal his wounds because sita mata didn't have any food So she fainted on lord ram They both took rest and served food Then the author asked then why did you go to forest Because to teach their sons about spirtual and make their sons better everyday the used to go to Ashram with their mother again they used to go back to kingdom Actually lord Narayan had a curse godes Lakshmi and Narayan should separate they both got separated only once that too when ravan kidnapped sita mata That's all They both lived happily Godess Lakshmi tells some authors wrote agnipariksha and sita banishment because of godess like me thrown out of my house so normal women dont do adultery mistakes Lord ram always supported women Ok No one is greater than hanuman Please chant hanuman chalisa or chant ram Then you will know the actual truth of ramayan
I mean, it was stated that it happened 10 million years ago. Obviously, you wouldn't have proof point is to take moral of that.. it's not about its real or not
@@_philosopher_00 let’s face the facts: this is not based on any real historical fact but purely mythical. How can you explain the monkey god? A god who is a monkey?
@@MyHopeSide when you consider all life is equal just the tools they have is different, and with will and dedication anything can transcend to new heights. then you will understand it...
@@MyHopeSide Sanatan dharma teaches every life has potential to transcend the limits that nature set on them. that is the philosophy .. if you believe the rest or not it's up you... gods and stories are like hope and guidance on how to behave and be in the time of need
Sri Rama killed Vaali. 1st mistake. Result, that vaali came as zara in next birth and sri rama came as sri krishna. Zara sent arrow on sri feet ending sri krishna life or made sri krishna to leave this earth. Mother seetha was made to walk on fire in sri lanka. Which prooved her chastity. Again he cannot be test her, and he knew that. Sri Rama made 2nd mistake sending her in pregency to forest. Once she esablished dharma on fire, rama has not right to punish her for same doubt 2nd time. So she refused when sri rama went. And she went into earth, because rama failed to observe dharma which is much higher than kingdom or people of that country. Dharma is greatest than the whole world or people of that country. Dharma is collapsing nearing end of kaliyuga. Rama should have gone along with her to forest for rest of his life. Guru does not know the deapth of dharma. You know he rared chickens and ran poultry. Divine man cannot do this. Same Guru had wife who died or made story as samadhi. But guru did not pass on the information of his wife death to his fatherinlaw, who fell in great sorrow. Anyone can see real gurus of past, never had anything, any attachment, no pomp abd show. Take 63 nayanmars of bgavan shiva or 13 alwars of sri vishnu. All of them lead abandoned life. Even recent, diamond merchant pattinathar, abandoned and went as begger. Nava Koti narayana 9 crores merchant of those days purander doss, walked away bear handed. He is telling inner engieering and twisting.
Yo chill guys y r u guys blaming lord Rama with no knowledge of their previous history . Lord Vishnu was cursed tht in his next life he wld live far frm his beloved m that's wt happnd Whn he took the birth as rama. He stayed away frm the one he loved and never married smone else . so pls . everything hppns for a reason . Sita knew all these and full filed her duty . staying with her brother valmiki during exile. It is said thr was nt a day rama Slpt without carrying the pain of sita in his heart . and once rama got his children he lost sita . hence his life was never easy to sit and judge. Not just sita went thru difficulties even rama did , his entire life . both didn't deserve wt they went thru
You have to know everything from meditation Only Read sundarakanda Agniparishka never happened Even sitas abandon too Read a thousand seeds of joy Where godess lakshmi tells about Agniparishka concept it fake Clearly she explained it
You have to know everything from meditation Only Read sundarakanda Agniparishka never happened Even sitas abandon too Read a thousand seeds of joy Where godess lakshmi tells about Agniparishka concept it fake Clearly she explained it And even the untold story of sita Please read
stupid answer by sadhguru. a good leader doesn't just blindly listen to whatever anyone says and give in to rumours. a good leader can make their own judgements and decisions. and a good leader isn't someone who betrays their own family members just to maintain their position. that's an opportunist.
What is a husband s responsibility on his wife according to so called sanathana?. Through out history people like sadguru try to misslead peopl ,and kept in darkness to survive the sanathana . They people will find so many guilt in Lord Buddha,but a single in rama and Krishna and other sanathanic god men .this is really funny
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
What a preposterous reasoning that defies the natural human sense of justice, logic and common sense. I am stunned by the insensitivity of Sadhguru to the suffering and feelings of Sita. And the applause from the audience at the end is frightening.
Sadguru is a sexist ....he is always been like that....in one video he said men should be careful about what kind of women they are are bringing home!!! What a nonsense statement so women should be dumb while choosing men? We are not some object which can be taken to someone's place....anyways Sadguru is also a human with flaws!!!
The spoilt kids are actually not reading the Ramayan, they are reading different perspectives of mind about Ramayan. Idiots should think, either Ramayan is fake then all perspectives about it becomes pointless, or if that is true, before reading perspectives go and read the scriptures first. May be if you read the scriptures, these evil perspectives and mindset would appear illogical to you
I think abandoning a wife like Sitaji is nowhere to be justified..... you are doing so because you know that your faith would be at stake and you are or never be ready to accept the harsh reality of Ramji
In Tulsi Ramayan, Ravan abducted Sita’s shadow. Lord Ram had asked Sita ji to stay hidden in Agni . So to bring her back after victory, he had to ask Agni Dev to give her back. Lord Ram never left Sita. It is a myth . Period
That's much fictional is in it...TulsiDas Heard Ramayan from Bir Hanuman , about this rahasya of keeping sita with agnidev that Ram told to lakhman in privately then how Hanuman knows that . If he knows then At the time of agni pariksha everybody should know about this secret of Chaya/Maya sita, so there will be no questions at all . -- if I am wrong please correct me with reference because I am also victim of this secret of agni pariksha. Searching the write meanings with reference. *What was the secret & why agni pariksha* Jay Siya- Ram
Its not that Goddess Sita meant a lot to him, its that he knew that SHE is the real power. The same fetus he put Sita thru tests wrote his ending and probable hell for loser Rama
@@keefefoster387412don't agree this man talk about sita exile.If anyone raped one girl .she is not criminal but she is victim. People Don't rights to blame victim. Ram also don't have any rights to gave agni pariksha. Ravan kidnap sita without her permission. So chances more he rape without her permission . This is very wrong . God test victim .it is right. Next I came to this man point . Ram send sita to valmiki ( brother)ashramThen what is this reason know only ram sita people talking rumors about sita .after this incident people strongly in her accusations about sita . Many more bad things spread about sita . Ram make sita is criminal infront of society. People believe ram Is incarnation ofKing ram is lord . Lord can do any injustice for any living organisms. So ram give extra sorrow for sita and inborn twins ( lava, kusa) . He spoiled child dignity .Next valmiki original name is ratnakar .actually he is theif before see ram and after see ram .he is devotee of her and ram give the name valmiki to her. Later period he wrote ramayan .he not brother of seetha ok. She is daughter of bhooma devi . ram didn't accept sita and her child still during last period ofshe living in this world she call her mother ( booma devi) and go with her . She proved her virgin the way of suicide. The reason is ram don't accept her child because of their political image.suppose he sent to brother home why he can't accept her child and she go her mother womb .next question is why luv and kush fight for ram action (sita exile) to ram and his brothers . Ram don't know her child or see her child after sitas delivery . Suppose he sent to her brother home then why he don't know who is her child .onematter is Clearly know ram give punishment to sita .not send her brothers house ok . If he save from people accusation then why he didnt sent sita to mithila *( mother home of sita ) that is palace all facilities in there but valmiki asram nothing equal to mithila . So don't hear this interviewer words please think this types of ways . ram all did for sita is save their own image from people. Or her prestige . He did for some in dhobhi wife. Dhobhi is not king of any kingdom. So it is not raj dharma also . Sugriva wife also kidnapped by vaali but he doesn't doubted his wife and he accepted his wife and he don't gave agni pariksha to hear rumor of people. Sugriva also king of one place. He has also have raj dharma ok.
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
Very funny explanation.. Then what about the people's screeming when he was sending vanavasa. There people dont have any value😂😂. Similar explanations from some other pandit jis ,make much fun.
Instead of sending sitha to jungle .Rama should have gone along with sitha after making Bharatha as the king .
True
bharat refused .
First time he went to jungle that's bcoz of keeping his father's promise, so he moved out. This time being a king he can't run away from duties and responsibilities. He is not like us who are just self centered beings. That's why that avatar suffered to show people that, no matter what in life Dharma has to be uplifted
Ramayana is the saddest story in history, it is full of sadness, separation, sacrifice, loss of kinghood, loss of wife, loss of father, loss of sons etc full of sacrifices and compromises , all ONLY because it was the right and examplery thing to do - the best example of dharma and karma a human can do, a father can do, a son can do, a king can do, a husband can do, always for righteousness, no matter how hard, how sad how heart breaking it may be, he controlled his senses and did the right thing, that why Rama is worshipped as God, no human can do such deeds and loose so much...
Guru Gobind Singh ji had similar story of loss. His little sons were sacrificed. I have heard he was Surya bansi, so somewhere from Sri Rams family tree.
Agree 💯
Had this happened in our life?
We would have committed suicide.
We wouldn't have tolerated.
Agniparishka never happened
There was only love
Kindly read a thousand seeds of joy and untold story of sita
No no no you are learning the different version of ramayan
No one is perfect in the world
Agnipariksha and sita banishment is fake
These stories are created to destroy the glory of lord ram
Actually there are many different versions of ramayan some people tell agnipariksha never happened
Some people will say agnipariksha happened to prove sita mata character
Some people get angry on this agnipariksha concept
See agnipariksha never happened
I read all concepts
I read the untold story of sita mata this book is amazing
A thousand seeds of joy
Agnipariksha never happened
I think it's important for the current generation to actually read Valmiki Ramayana and then ask questions..It's just heart wrenching what Rama went through.One should also understand why there was a Ramavatara.
Agniparishka never happened
You have to go through meditation
Kindly read a thousand seeds of joy
In that book gidess lakshmi tells about the Agniparishka concept
Agniparishka never happened
She tells this thing to a devotee
You would want a king like that but you wouldn't want your daughter to marry a man like him, knowing that her life will hold little value in camparision to this kingdom.
True!
With all due respect Duryodhana was at fault and had committed crimes whilst Sita was innocent and punished for no fault of her own . Nor was she given any explanation as to why she was left in the jungle.
No doubt Lord Rama was an exemplary ruler and loving husband and he remained equanimous throughout all the storms life threw at him.
This situation could have been handled differently and logically . He could have upheld his trust in his own wife on a public platform and opened up a path for his subjects to follow and look into.
dude you have sort of half cooked knowledge ....real Sita wasn't there when Raavan abducted her it was Sita Saaya or a sort of doppelganger . Sometime in initial days of vaanvas Ram gave sita to Aagni dev to be protected and took Sita maa Saya with him and when he freed Sita maa from Raavan . Sita gave Aagni Pariksha and Ram got real Sita from Aagni dev to him .
Real Sertha was ot there means how it showed. As per the story Ravan took Seetha
Agniparishka never happened
Kindly read a thousand seeds of joy and untold story of sita
@@madurgqmadurga8818it happened
But who is Ram to take decisions on
Sita's behalf?
Her husband
And she is his wife so what?
This was more than 5000 years ago. Please understand the time and context.
i love ramji i have no doubt on his actions but i need proper knowledge so that i can silent the haters of ramji
jai shri ram ❤❤❤
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
@ojasgirdhar7049; Girdharji, Satyemeva Jayete, Sri Ram, as a person with feelings, did no wrong, but it does not elevate him worthy of worship as an avatar of Vishnu. He, in Rage and revenge, murdered Ravan and Khumbhkaran for Sita haran with the help of Hanumanji, a flying monkey with a flaming tail, failed to pluck out the shrubs growing on the parvat, yet it broke apart the parvat. LOL, Hanumanji flew across Bharath carrying the parvat like an airplane to light a fire to Lanka to burn its inhabitants, including women and children, committing the World's first GENOCIDE for KATIL Ram. Aeronautically and biologically, JHOOT and bakwas. Giridhanji, The pivotal Hindu dharm granth, Bhagwat Gita, claims to contain the verbal discourse Krishna supposedly gave Arjun during the Mahabharath war between the Pandavas and their cousins, 100 Kauravas, sons of ONE couple, blind Dhritarashtra and Gsndhari, which is biologically and statistically JHOOT and BAKWAS. Girdharji, FYI, Sri Krishna was born in 3228 BCE,>2000 years after the Mahabharath war of 5561 BCE. The TALES of Krishna assisting Arjun as his charioteer while verbally narrating Bhagwat Gita is the TAIL of LIES/ JHOOT/ MITHYA. Facts lead to the truth missing in Hinduism/Sanatan dharm.
Sita asked Ram to leave her in Jungle at Valmiki ashram. She told him that his praja comes first.
@@thehunterthehunter5447don't agree this man talk about sita exile.If anyone raped one girl .she is not criminal but she is victim. People Don't rights to blame victim. Ram also don't have any rights to gave agni pariksha. Ravan kidnap sita without her permission. So chances more he rape without her permission . This is very wrong . God test victim .it is right. Next I came to this man point . Ram send sita to valmiki ( brother)ashramThen what is this reason know only ram sita people talking rumors about sita .after this incident people strongly in her accusations about sita . Many more bad things spread about sita . Ram make sita is criminal infront of society. People believe ram Is incarnation ofKing ram is lord . Lord can do any injustice for any living organisms. So ram give extra sorrow for sita and inborn twins ( lava, kusa) . He spoiled child dignity .Next valmiki original name is ratnakar .actually he is theif before see ram and after see ram .he is devotee of her and ram give the name valmiki to her. Later period he wrote ramayan .he not brother of seetha ok. She is daughter of bhooma devi . ram didn't accept sita and her child still during last period ofshe living in this world she call her mother ( booma devi) and go with her . She proved her virgin the way of suicide. The reason is ram don't accept her child because of their political image.suppose he sent to brother home why he can't accept her child and she go her mother womb .next question is why luv and kush fight for ram action (sita exile) to ram and his brothers . Ram don't know her child or see her child after sitas delivery . Suppose he sent to her brother home then why he don't know who is her child .onematter is Clearly know ram give punishment to sita .not send her brothers house ok . If he save from people accusation then why he didnt sent sita to mithila *( mother home of sita ) that is palace all facilities in there but valmiki asram nothing equal to mithila . So don't hear this interviewer words please think this types of ways . ram all did for sita is save their own image from people. Or her prestige . He did for some in dhobhi wife. Dhobhi is not king of any kingdom. So it is not raj dharma also . Sugriva wife also kidnapped by vaali but he doesn't doubted his wife and he accepted his wife and he don't gave agni pariksha to hear rumor of people. Sugriva also king of one place. He has also have raj dharma ok.
Vishnu was cursed by Vrinda for tricking her so Shiva can kill Jalandhar. She said in one lifetime he will also live without his beloved wife/ partner like she is now without her partner. So Vishnu as Ram fulfilled her curse by living without Sita. Ram never married . He loved Sita only . He lived till end without the love of his life. Vishnu and Shiva doesn’t care what these people think. They performed their duties. Karma is bigger than anything even Gods are bound with laws of Karma.
when rama was sent on exil, there was no expectations on Sita to follow him in the Jungle and go through all the things she went through. HOWEVER, WHEN THERE WAS AGNIPARIKSHA she sat alone on it. He was not a good husband and i agree to the young man when he says he had to showoff to his people. often when i take darshan at temples and come across Ram and Sita. i always pray to Sita to give me the strength to lead in life by my choice and if ever i come across a Rama as compagnon make sure i leave his side if ever he leaves me on the "agnipariksha". EVERYBODY PRAISE RAMA but they omit and deny to give the due respect to Sita SHE WAS A PRINCESS IN HER FATHER'S LAND. HE DEFINETLY WAS NOT A GOOD HUSBAND AS HE LEFT HIS WIFE SIDE WHEN SHE WAS PUT AT TEST while she was a good wife by walking at his side on his exile - and yes he had a choice since Bharat was ruling in his absence HE JUST TOOK HIS WIFE FOR GRANTED and it was not him to send Sita to the forest she left with respect and never turned back even when Ram came to visit luv and kush and requested her to come back she refused
Ram was weak - honourless and he left the woman who loved him desolate.
This man is a people pleaser..
Supporting another people pleaser- Ram
I can clearly see Ghor Kalyug starting to surface .
After he sent her away, he provided her with nothing, was she sent any helpers, knowing that she is pregnant, he did it for his people's sake, he should have left her where she was instead of taking her to one hell to another, at least she had 2 sons, without a dad, sounds like the typical men of today
What do you want from modi ??? He is elected to serve the nation ... You want him to put his self interest first(self interest in narrow sense)??? Are you a brainless idiot??? For a good king his people is the first thing,....and how do you know that Sita was all alone in jungle??? He is the king he might have someone to look after her ....just don't look for assumption.. this is not your motherfucking small family... Even to do household task you keep fighting with your husband/wife and you are judging Ram who has to look after his kingdom??? For any king his son comes first but for a good king his people comes first ... because there are people so he is a king .... That means you will sacrifice entire Kingdom who made you king for your self interest??? Your self interest is very narrow,,,is not it?? For a king his self interest is his kingdom his self interest is broader , for selfish people his/her self interest is his/her wife, his/her children ,his/her wealthy life, his /her standard of living....your self interest might be exclusive but for a king his self interest is inclusive,he has to work for the people.... And this is not your family with 4-5 people he has to run a kingdom with millions of people....he has his dilemma between his self interest in broader sense (which is his kingdom) vs self interest in narrow sense (which is his beloved wife and son who will be the next king)
Jai Shree Ram Jai Hanuman ji Jai Mahadev Jai SitaRam Jai Srimannarayana 🙏 💙 ✨ ❤ 💖 😊 🙏 💙 ✨ 🕉🕉🕉🕉🕉
@mihirkeesra508; Mihirji, Satyemeva Jayete, I hope you are not visually blind, then open your mind to Ram's friend, Hanuman was a monkey that could not fly as it had No wings, nor could light a fire with its flaming tail as it would have roasted Hanuman ready by lunch. Ram could have been the son of Dashrath Maharaj, but because of Hanuman, a flying monkey with a flaming tail, Ramayan is a mythology. Mihirji Bhagwat Gita, the pivotal Hindy dharm granth, is claimed to contain the verbal discourse Krishna supposedly gave Arjun during the Mahabharath war between the Pandavas and the 1000 Kauravas in 5561BCE. Mihirji, Sr Krishana was born in 3228 BCE, >2000 years AFTER the mahabharath war of 5561. TALES of Krishna assisting Arjun as his charioteer while giving verbal discourse is the TAIL of LIES/ JHOOT/ MITHYA. Kauravas being 100 sons of blind Dhritarashtra and Gandhari biologically and statistically FALSE and ABSURD. Facts lead to the truth, and the truth shall set you free, Not Hindu mythological tales. Use common sense, discard mythological Hinduism/ Sanatan dharm, and replace it with worshiping a loving and jivit Parmeshwar.
Bharath was ruling the kingdom before Ram returned, if ram had given the throne to bharath, he could have lived with his wife happily and would not have heard such disturbing things about Sita maiya.
Osho is right about ram ... He was no lord ...he was just a gentle man... He Lacks revolution
He's saying that Ram left sita because his people don't like a woman who has been with another man for a long time. But everybody knows that only for the sake of his ego that evil man kept a goddess like sita in his custody. The thing is that, then why did Ram gone so far to bring her back? Only to leave pregnant women in the jungle who always loved him and never given a chance for another man in her heart. Just to please some people. It felt very bad.
it is. people should accept this just as a story from another time. all religions are powergames as well. we need to throw out a lot of bathwater.
@@brisingr12 don't agree this man talk about sita exile.If anyone raped one girl .she is not criminal but she is victim. People Don't rights to blame victim. Ram also don't have any rights to gave agni pariksha. Ravan kidnap sita without her permission. So chances more he rape without her permission . This is very wrong . God test victim .it is right. Next I came to this man point . Ram send sita to valmiki ( brother)ashramThen what is this reason know only ram sita people talking rumors about sita .after this incident people strongly in her accusations about sita . Many more bad things spread about sita . Ram make sita is criminal infront of society. People believe ram Is incarnation ofKing ram is lord . Lord can do any injustice for any living organisms. So ram give extra sorrow for sita and inborn twins ( lava, kusa) . He spoiled child dignity .Next valmiki original name is ratnakar .actually he is theif before see ram and after see ram .he is devotee of her and ram give the name valmiki to her. Later period he wrote ramayan .he not brother of seetha ok. She is daughter of bhooma devi . ram didn't accept sita and her child still during last period ofshe living in this world she call her mother ( booma devi) and go with her . She proved her virgin the way of suicide. The reason is ram don't accept her child because of their political image.suppose he sent to brother home why he can't accept her child and she go her mother womb .next question is why luv and kush fight for ram action (sita exile) to ram and his brothers . Ram don't know her child or see her child after sitas delivery . Suppose he sent to her brother home then why he don't know who is her child .onematter is Clearly know ram give punishment to sita .not send her brothers house ok . If he save from people accusation then why he didnt sent sita to mithila *( mother home of sita ) that is palace all facilities in there but valmiki asram nothing equal to mithila . So don't hear this interviewer words please think this types of ways . ram all did for sita is save their own image from people. Or her prestige . He did for some in dhobhi wife. Dhobhi is not king of any kingdom. So it is not raj dharma also . Sugriva wife also kidnapped by vaali but he doesn't doubted his wife and he accepted his wife and he don't gave agni pariksha to hear rumor of people. Sugriva also king of one place. He has also have raj dharma ok.
What most people don't know that he did not just leave Sita in the forest while she was pregnant, he left her at an ashram which belonged to Sita's brother and he wanted people to stop questioning Sita's character but he still wanted to continue his duty as a king
@@Giganigga417 first read my commentthen you raisethe same question again
@@kavitharamesh8384 who gave this right to judge someone. Then you are against even your parents and everyone idiot grow up do sadhnapada
As a husband Ram is a perfect example of patriarchy of society.
Bt what about Sita and her self-respect?
Why would they care about Sita ji? I am beginning to think that he brought back Sita ji not for her but for his pride , because even today if my wife is taken away by another man, i must need to bring her back to save my pride
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
The life of Lord Ram is a lesson for all of us... It's a simple theory of karmic cycle... Lord Ram asked Mata Sita to leave the kingdom for the sake of his obligation to uphold the law of his land... In his next incarnation he didn't get to be with the woman whom he loved with all his heart... His kingdom was destroyed...He couldn't get to live with his original parents... His complete life was a tragedy... So it's a lesson that when it comes to karma even the supreme personality is also not forgiven we are just mere human beings so we should say and do things which won't hurt us in future when they come back at us
No wonder women have to fight their own battle after being royal n going with ram in exile for 14 yrs she is thrown in fire infront of him is it justified
Unfortunately the story is right...there was a dhobi who made Sri Ram think about all this bullshit about mata sita
Yeah yeah people, blame the victim and give them more pain, why don't you!
Support the accused and say he is human and don't kill him.
I think shri Rama is a person who should be idol for everyone. HOWEVER IN MY OPINION AGNIPARIKSHA CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED. That era was of King and kingdom.... today we have government and people. My countering question for sadhguru ji remarks at 1:31 is that ordinary people even today says that girls are also in fault when rape happens, many says that those girl are of not good character or they are not wearing proper cloths etc so should our government should also punish rape victim girl just because ordinary people think so (just like shri ram punished sita mata). I can not agree with it and I can not agree with agnipariksha. AGAIN NO DISRESPECT TO RAMJI. HE MUST HAVE DONE TRILLIONS OF GOOD DEEDS. I JUST THINK AGNI PARIKSHA AINT ONE OF THEM
What is the question of her character? She was kidnapped. How can you tell someone to prove her character if she was kidnapped?? She did not go with someone by choice.
Even gor the kingdom sake this action was unfair, unfair to ladies in Kingdom and future generations, that if a man kidnap a lady then her family should abandon her blaming her character?? This action was not right for the people of Kingdom also because in people of Kingdom there are women too. We have to respect our Lord Ram for so many things but also we have to accept that this action was unfair.
It is mentioned in Valmiki Ramayana. He said he did all because of Kul Pratishtha. Please read Ramayana. Problem is no body read Ramayana and just provide comments.
Sadguru is just glorifying Rama, I mean it's okay to accept whatever it is.
The questions were legit and today's life this explanation does match at all. Forget for a moment Rama as a persona nd consider him doing the same thing today to his wife, how many people will support this? Kuch b
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
@@atharalimaan8509have you ever read the original valmiki ramayan ?? Or r u just passing judgements based on a vedio clip ? Sita never gave Agni pariksha , its not mentioned in Valmiki Ramayan. Plzz read your original scriptures before passing comments on something hypothetical.
Actually, it is not that comparable today because we don't have Kings anymore. But few centuries earlier we can draw comparisons. A kings duty is first as a King and then any personal relationships. And it should always be that way, because the security of his citizens and kingdom depends on it. Now in democracy we can elect someone else, then it wasn't the case. Eg, If Prithviraj Chauhan didn't have a beef with his cousin, he wouldn't have been betrayed and maybe not have lost his kingdom. If Maharana Pratap would have taken his role as a family man first, he would have never allowed his children to live in some forest with no security instead of a palace with the luxery a royal would enjoy. But his duty to his Kingdom came first. Even today, a soldier is a soldier first, a son second. Or else he would always choose a different career especially if he is an only child. Am I saying Sita should have been punished? No!! But Rama's intension were not of someone who thought of his wife as an object, but a King who made a personal sacrifice for his Kingdom.
@@geisha-1212don't agree this man talk about sita exile.If anyone raped one girl .she is not criminal but she is victim. People Don't rights to blame victim. Ram also don't have any rights to gave agni pariksha. Ravan kidnap sita without her permission. So chances more he rape without her permission . This is very wrong . God test victim .it is right. Next I came to this man point . Ram send sita to valmiki ( brother)ashramThen what is this reason know only ram sita people talking rumors about sita .after this incident people strongly in her accusations about sita . Many more bad things spread about sita . Ram make sita is criminal infront of society. People believe ram Is incarnation ofKing ram is lord . Lord can do any injustice for any living organisms. So ram give extra sorrow for sita and inborn twins ( lava, kusa) . He spoiled child dignity .Next valmiki original name is ratnakar .actually he is theif before see ram and after see ram .he is devotee of her and ram give the name valmiki to her. Later period he wrote ramayan .he not brother of seetha ok. She is daughter of bhooma devi . ram didn't accept sita and her child still during last period ofshe living in this world she call her mother ( booma devi) and go with her . She proved her virgin the way of suicide. The reason is ram don't accept her child because of their political image.suppose he sent to brother home why he can't accept her child and she go her mother womb .next question is why luv and kush fight for ram action (sita exile) to ram and his brothers . Ram don't know her child or see her child after sitas delivery . Suppose he sent to her brother home then why he don't know who is her child .onematter is Clearly know ram give punishment to sita .not send her brothers house ok . If he save from people accusation then why he didnt sent sita to mithila *( mother home of sita ) that is palace all facilities in there but valmiki asram nothing equal to mithila . So don't hear this interviewer words please think this types of ways . ram all did for sita is save their own image from people. Or her prestige . He did for some in dhobhi wife. Dhobhi is not king of any kingdom. So it is not raj dharma also . Sugriva wife also kidnapped by vaali but he doesn't doubted his wife and he accepted his wife and he don't gave agni pariksha to hear rumor of people. Sugriva also king of one place. He has also have raj dharma ok.
@@kavitharamesh8384tell this nonsense in your missionary halls as a individual Lord Ram doesn't have any right to give Agni Pariksha to Sita but as a future king and Sita the future queen of Ayodhya it is his duty to show his people that he and his wife are pure , go and read Ramayan properly where Shri Ram clearly tells that I want to show Sita the queen of Ayodhya is pure to all worlds here no one is testing the victim and also please learn that if Rama really doubt sita why would he accept luva and kusha he would easily abundant three of them and marry another woman and also you should know that during the ashwamedha yaga he placed Golden statue of Sita(as wife presence is compulsory) this clearly shows his devotion towards his wife ,dhobi is not king of any Kingdom but you should know that Dhobi is the citizen of Ayodhya and kings Prime duty is to bound to his citizens (you will understand when you consider role of a king as a responsibility instead of authority), yes Sugriv wife is also with Vali and Sugriv is a king but you should know Sugriv is Vanar and Vanar public dosent mean this issue pls
read Ramayan properly
Then why the hell he fought raavan if in the end he was to abandon sita he would have told sita to marry ravan instead
May be Rama didn't think that people in his kingdom would be so toxic!
Why did Gobind Singh fight Mughals if in the end he went to meet the emperor Aurangzeb?
If you want to understand Ram then you need to deep down in the character and situation of Raja Ram ...then only you can answer all these question....
We worship Shri Ram...but is that really justified ki.. ek pregnant women ko sacrifice krdya???
Wo khud se apne baccho ko paali...is that true??
If yes toh kya sekhna chahiye Hume???
Thinking in 5000 BC was very different than today
All tradition and etiquettes are same...just way has been changed
@@vivekjaiswal6733 literally nothing is same even from 1000 AD which is 1000 yrs back. Here we are talking of 6000 years back!
@@Raut-warrior just a simple question satug ho ya kalyug is this justified to leave a pregnant woman in the jungle ??
@@vivekjaiswal6733 is it justified for old person to marry teenager? Is it justified for only men to rule and women to cook? Is it justified for people of one caste to not touch other? Is it justified to believe in superstitions?
All these things happened in old eras irrespective of justified or not
The point here is men always considered women as a thing
In Ramayan
One person Ravan kept sita to proof her power
Second person Ram ask her to go away in pregnant condition
Why didn't they do DNA test that time itself to proof who's kids they were
Why only women needs to provide proof , did anyone ask Ram , if he had done something with other female during his vanvas , it is because only women have got something for being pregnant there is no proof for men to show up the same thing
If nobody knows anything why we are workshiped him
How can we say , the same guru is saying in last all is written only , there is no proof for that too.
What dna test 5000 years ago ? What are u on ?
And understand the context before yapping . Both rama and sita experienced injustice throughout their life
Wrongly said . No trust in his wife
Sita left everything for ram but when it came to justify he opted rajya over sita
Cause duty comes over personal comforts... If you read valmiki Ramayan Rama also renounces Lakshmana for his duty
As a king when he heard the rumor at least he would've asked the responsible oerson tonout out her statement amd verdict is delivered rather in court than not in midnight silently...
The king who can't protect his own lady how can he protect the kingdom. It shows his inability. Sorry Guruji it is my opinion.
He could have renounced the throne to his brother Bharat who by the looks of it would have made a good king too. At the end of the day maybe it's about priorities in his role as a king and husband and he assumed that of the former 🤷🏻♀️
He actually asked Bharata to that which bharata flatly refused he was even about to curse him for that
Budha Not left his family, after getting enlightenment. he came back and met them and considered them as disciples and later those followed the same practice to spread peace and love in public
Drishtarashtra and Rama....both situations were entirely different...Drishtarashtra stands with wrong...But what was done with sita was wrong...
The dobby who passed comment on mother seetha was born as Tasagan during Sri krishna times. Sri krishna bangs him to down to earth. Do karma plays role in sri rama times. The hunch back lady in ramayan, comes as kubja in sri krishna Time.
Person cannot leave wife just because someone will be happy. If he has to choose between family vs state
I don't see any contradiction here King and Queen should be acceptable to common people people rejected sita as they thought she lived with other man for 14 years, obviously in those days future heirs of the throne will have some suspicion which is not good for Kingdom, Ram also wanted to renounce and go with Sita however none of the brothers or nobles allowed that hence he chose raj dharma over vyakti dharma, for the love of sita he never remarried even though he was pressurized since it was his personal choice. Some kind of Validation of heirs in terms of looks and prowess was needed which happened after lav and kush were born during aswamedha hence he accepted and annointed them this is all very clearly raj dharma King is always and always answerable to people period
still it was too much to send a pregnant woman to jungle that is after she proved her purity through agnipariksha. she was his responsibility and i do not think there any thing to do with praja if lord Rama to marry Sita or not i mean in that era there kings who had many wifes, and after considering the fact Sita had to go through agni pariksha to prove her purity and pass it and still be sent to jungle because of fellow citizen, i dont think it is justified in any way, i dont want to sound bad but i think people should not be biased in this topic i mean Lord Rama was a great person but still i think he failed in this part. and also Sita was also Lord Rama praja after marrying her. so failed to give his citizen justice too i guess,
i know will be getting many hate comments, correct me if am wrong in any thing or you want to share your perspective, if you being biased and replyig you lost your stand .
i agree.. but we need to understand that ramayan is not a story of god. its a story of a human whom we see as a god due to his idealistic character in that time period which is some thousand years back. Did you watch the anime naruto ? if u did remember itachi. None of us blamed him for killing his own clan for the sake of konoha. We see his pain and understood the circumstances and hence refer him as "god itachi ". We should understand the circumstances due to which rama did what he did .Rama is a human and when his life ended he carried some achievemnts ( like being a righteous leader ) some hardships ( like battle with ravana for sita ) some guilts and failures ( like sita agnipariksha , and sending her to jungle , killing vali etc ) . when we look into his story isnt it how our human lives are ? we face situations where we need to take hard decisions even when it pains us deeply? we struggle to satisfy and give justice to everyone.he is a human may be he made mistakes.. lets know the story of a great king who once lived on this earth... he might be flawed just like everyone of us..but still he is something.
@@that__thing7417 I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAID , I AM FULLY AWARE THAT IN BOTH THE CASES FOR ITACHI AND LORD RAMA, THE PURPOSE FOR THEIR DEED WAS NOBLE BUT THE WAY WAS WRONG, EVEN THOUGH IT MAY BE THE ONLY OPTION , A WRONG DEED IS A WRONG DEED, I DON'T THINK LORD RAMA OR ITACHI WOULD JUSTIFY THEMSELF BY THINKING THE WAY TO DO IT WAS RIGHT, THEY BOTH KNEW IT WAS A WRONG PATH TO TAKE , I MEAN THEY WERE DOING SOMETHING BAD TO THEIR LOVED ONES, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS NECESSARY.
MY POINT WAS THAT HE FAILED IN THIS PART. AND LORD RAMA WAS THE AVATAR OF LORD VISHNU, HE IS TYPICALLY A GOD
@@warriortayang4515 ya he failed thts is my point too.. and yeah rama is an avatar of vishnu ... but rama is not a god he is human. he told this himself that he came to earth to live as human and die as human and experienced joy and sorrow just like any other human being.
just for ur reference ... yudhksnd Sarg 117, Shloka 11
"आत्मानं मानुषं मन्ये रामं दशरथात्मजम् "
rama said these himself that he is a human
I mean.. he is god before the avatar and after the avatar but during the avatar he is a human.
@@that__thing7417 LORD RAMA IS A GREAT KING INDEED , THERE IS NO QUESTION ABOUT IT BUT MA SITA WAS HIS LOVE HIS LIFE , HOW CAN HE DO IT, HE IS THE KING AND I MEAN MA SITA LITERALLY STOOD FOR LORD RAMA , SHE LEFT HER KINGDOM AND SPEND HER LIFE IN JUNGLE EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS A PRINCESS. SHE DID WRONG TO MA SITA. AND IT WAS WRONG.
@@warriortayang4515 he didnt leave her some where in the jungle to live her own life. he kept her at valmiki maharshi ashram who is equivalent to her brother. By doing this he 1) erased the negativity on sita. Bro just think.. ramayan happend thousands of years back and till today no one is blaming sita everyone blamed rama for leaving her . That is exactly what ram wanted. he shifted the negativity towards him and it worked till date. I didnt see this kind of supreme love. If he didnt do it that way some way or other some random guy some idiot in the present world would have said " sita is wd some stranger and ram kept her wd him again " for sure. But ram didnt want even the slightest negativity over his pyaar sita
2) re established the trust in people. Those days a king is meant to be a person who had no blackmark.( unlike the politician now 🥲). Its soo important for a king to keep his people trust as a priority . We have to understand that.
❤❤❤
People who have similar doubt's, kindly take your time to learn about anand Ramayan by maharshi Valmiki
Throw Away??? Ram Ji sent Maa Sita to Valmiki ji ( her brother as both were born from earth )
Uttarakhand is not a part of Valmiki Ramayana which is called the original source of it... And it is mentioned in Ramcharitmanas that Sita Maa gave Agnipariksha to get her real form back... The Sita Maa that was abducted by Ravana Was actually Chaya Sita, the real Sita Maa secured herself at Agni Dev's shelter as soon as she realised She was about to be abducted... That's the whole story 🙏❤️ JaiSiyaRamHanumanji 🙏❤️ OmShriParvatiShivayaNamah 🙏❤️
What are those twin prince who were born in jungle...what wrong they did..
people will again raise questions does children belongs to ravana too
It truly troubles to see that people are questioning the ethics of Bhagwaan Ram.. He is an idealistic king who lives in our hearts, So we worship him.. Thanks to the western people, such ideologies have surfaced...
Why we should not .. does woman doesnt deserve respect ..entire stupid society is Patriarchal. .Nothing specific about Hinduism
When you people question others religion then its okay but when the world questions your bhagwan then its not okay wow hypocricy on next level
@@5-june when did u ever see me question Allah or Jesus.. i dont know about them, so i cannot question them..
so stop generalising all hindus.. less than 2% hindus disrespect other religions..
@@gaurangkulkarni4357
Be unbiased for one second and listen, questioning is important, questioning has always been important , because of questioning, analysing and criticising, lot of stupid practices have been abolished be it Sati, Sex slavery , concubines, child marriages ,racism , Misogyny, and the list goes on and on , I know these things are not 100% finished ,but only because of questioning these things have been diminished to minute , Be unbiased for a sec and think, Questioning objectionable things and practices is very important for the advancement of the society in a good direction
@@atharalimaan8509 hindism also practice this
Bro ram sent sita to valmiki ashram in
forest.. Valmiki is sitas brother....when
people in ramrajya called sita badly and
blame her and they doesn't want sita to
become their queen... Ram decided to leave
kingdom with sita and go to forest or giving
his brothers the kingdom or another option
is sent sita to the forest.. But the brothers
don't want to rule the kingdom and also they
don't want their brother and brother's wife to
go in jungle... Ram asked sita, sita doesn't
want ram to lose his kingdom, so she
requested ram to kindly hear her opinion
she herself go to the Forest without ram..
Ram accepted her request and with tears
and then he sent sita to the banks of river
near valmiki ashram...here ram did dharma
for the people and as a husband... Ram is
maryadhapurushothaman... Jai shree ram🙏
Thank you . People need to read Ramayan in detail before questioning. Also it’s not their fault at the same time as Ramayan was summarised and told without reasons. There should be a Ramayan series in detail.
@@thehunterthehunter5447don't agree this man talk about sita exile.If anyone raped one girl .she is not criminal but she is victim. People Don't rights to blame victim. Ram also don't have any rights to gave agni pariksha. Ravan kidnap sita without her permission. So chances more he rape without her permission . This is very wrong . God test victim .it is right. Next I came to this man point . Ram send sita to valmiki ( brother)ashramThen what is this reason know only ram sita people talking rumors about sita .after this incident people strongly in her accusations about sita . Many more bad things spread about sita . Ram make sita is criminal infront of society. People believe ram Is incarnation ofKing ram is lord . Lord can do any injustice for any living organisms. So ram give extra sorrow for sita and inborn twins ( lava, kusa) . He spoiled child dignity .Next valmiki original name is ratnakar .actually he is theif before see ram and after see ram .he is devotee of her and ram give the name valmiki to her. Later period he wrote ramayan .he not brother of seetha ok. She is daughter of bhooma devi . ram didn't accept sita and her child still during last period ofshe living in this world she call her mother ( booma devi) and go with her . She proved her virgin the way of suicide. The reason is ram don't accept her child because of their political image.suppose he sent to brother home why he can't accept her child and she go her mother womb .next question is why luv and kush fight for ram action (sita exile) to ram and his brothers . Ram don't know her child or see her child after sitas delivery . Suppose he sent to her brother home then why he don't know who is her child .onematter is Clearly know ram give punishment to sita .not send her brothers house ok . If he save from people accusation then why he didnt sent sita to mithila *( mother home of sita ) that is palace all facilities in there but valmiki asram nothing equal to mithila . So don't hear this interviewer words please think this types of ways . ram all did for sita is save their own image from people. Or her prestige . He did for some in dhobhi wife. Dhobhi is not king of any kingdom. So it is not raj dharma also . Sugriva wife also kidnapped by vaali but he doesn't doubted his wife and he accepted his wife and he don't gave agni pariksha to hear rumor of people. Sugriva also king of one place. He has also have raj dharma ok.
No. no the king should be openly give punishment. Sita is the countrys praja. The king should give punishment after the culprits statement. And the guilty should be must be proved Without any proof how can a king give judgement as per his wish.
I have read Rmayan many times. But i cant digest Rams this action. how one can follow Ram to be a good person
your above story is not believanle if Ram wants to send his wofe for delivery why cant he tell opemly. Is it right to a kin g
Can I Say plz
''This is a ritual Matalab ek taraf se agni agniparikhsha jaruri thi isliye sita mata ne kiya That doesn't mean that ram ji doesn't believe in Siya
He belives in Siya So that he tested sita for agnipariksha
Or jab sab Sita mata ke khilaf the
One Sadhu tell to ram ji ki Dil se socho wah kya kehta hai
So, Ram ji ka dil janta tha sita aisa nhi kar sakti
Lekin sita ne samjaj ke liye ram ji ko chod ke chli gyi because sab sochte na ki ram ji ne aabhi bhi sita ko apne paas rakha hai samjaj ke belive ke liye ram ji ne sita ko swear lene ko kaha lekin sita ko laga ki ram ji ko Vishvas nhi hai isliye wah dharti mata ke paas chli gyi But....... Ram ji ne chodha todhi na unhone kya kya karne par gussa huye ki main puri duniya ko kuch kar dunga lekin Jo other god the undone ram ji ko samjhaya ki next janm mein sita hi aapki Patni hogi Example:vishnu lakshmi to Unka gussa shant hua or luv kush ke sath rhe
That's why hameine suna hi hai ki saccha prem Har Janmashtami ke liye hota hai dusre janm mekn mil gye ❤❤
Siya pati Ram chadr ji ki jay
To unko bishwas tha❤Never say that unko nahi tha
Dhritarashtra becomes possessive for son and all decision in favour of his son which is wrong
People talk of jungle? Mahrishi Valmiki's ashram was in the jungle like vana (वन).... Nowadays , people go on vacation and find solace in a nature stay. Why can't your imagination reach that level. In the dialog in the cart with Lakshmana, Sita herself declares her love for jungle and her desire to go to jungle when she was pregnant. Ram sends her to Valmiki's ashram thinking of her state and what best could be done at that moment.
When have you all become so great to find the god's mistake? And the era is Ramayana- Treta yug which was approx. some 8000-10000 yrs back. May god bless you all.
Let me ask u something, sita was prisoned by ravan for 14 years and after whole these years she didn't even let ravana to took her purity and ram rescued her and tested her to know if she's pure or not just imagin a women waited for her whole life for her man and he doubted u imagine how mentally traumatized she is and he even proceed to abandone her after getting pregnent how crual u can be huh how can a wife live without her husband all this time sita was the one suffered not ram he is the worst human ever existed
0:27 This happens when you haven't read Anand Ramayan bhy Valmiki
king dassrath promises crowning of rama. He fails. He sends rama to forest.
Dasarath kills a boy of disabled parents, and curse goes that he will die due to his son. So things go like that to maintain dharma.
So to maintain dharma, once mother seetha tested on fire, rama has no right to punish her. So she goes into earth leaving rama
Questioning is very correct answer or totally wrong
जय श्री राम। 🕉
Agnipariksha never happened
Please go though a thousand seeds of joy and the untold story of sita.
Sadhguru Maharaj ,
There is something to add about KARMA .
1 . When Sita was a young teenager , 2 parrots came to
visit her . They died . One of them was reborn as the Dhobi
of Ayodhya .
2 . A golden deer caught her fancy ! She was yet to overcome
lust and greed .
3 . Lakshman Rekha is a symbol of obedience and discipline ,
the trespass unwarranted .
🙏🇮🇳🙏.
Just ask the guy if the guy next to him steals his girlfriend and keeps for a decade and then the audience questions him fighting for her bringing her back, what he would do to set an example.
Those who don't have read any literature and how different things used to happen in different times in human civilization are asking stupid questions comparing from this times.
King duty is teach good things to people but ram is ram is bad example for people ok. Blood is blood whats the era
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
No one are perfect in the world
Respect everyone
But I can say from my heart
My lord ram and sita mata never done agnipariksha
I love lord ram a lot
Some people tell spirtual stories
Some people support lord ram he is a king it's his duty to obey people
Some people get angry on lord ram actions
They keep on judging lord ram
On basis of agnipariksha
No on basis of UA-cam and media that's all
See if billions of people believe in agnipariksha or sita mata banishment
I read many comments
I watched many serials
Nowadays UA-cam is the best book
I watched many youtubers discussing about lord rams agnipariksha
some people tell lakshmanarekha is also fake
Some people tell uttar ramayan is fake Some people say no uttar ramayan is part of valmiki ramayan only
Who is correct
Then you have to go through meditation
I read a thousand seeds of joy
Godess Lakshmi and Godess Saraswati
Teachings
In that the author also ask to godess Lakshmi did you went through fire test No I repeat again no
there is only love no fire test
Did ram leave you
She explains all doubts all mysteries about ramayan
And in the untold story of sita mata
In that book also actual ramayan story is different
After ravan death
When sita mata see lord ram fire comes out of her body which is her power
So godess Lakshmi explains people and authors misunderstood about this concept and created agnipariksha story
Even Author tulsidas he is none other than sage valmiki
Even he mentioned agnipariksha concept
But what I read he forgetted some of his previous incarnation incidents and moments
In the untold of sita
Ravan used to give bad dreams for sita mata then godess Parvati mata comes and rescue sita mata
Please do meditation on lord ram that's all I will take care of you
After ravan death
Lord ram thought to heal his wounds because sita mata didn't have any food
So she fainted on lord ram
They both took rest and served food
Then the author asked then why did you go to forest
Because to teach their sons about spirtual and make their sons better everyday the used to go to Ashram with their mother again they used to go back to kingdom
Actually lord Narayan had a curse godes Lakshmi and Narayan should separate they both got separated only once that too when ravan kidnapped sita mata
That's all
They both lived happily
Godess Lakshmi tells some authors wrote agnipariksha and sita banishment because of godess like me thrown out of my house so normal women dont do adultery mistakes
Lord ram always supported women
Ok
No one is greater than hanuman
Please chant hanuman chalisa or chant ram
Then you will know the actual truth of ramayan
It show it a human nature.
Men made story.
But good story god and evils
Isn’t all this mythological? Why sweat over this story to begin with? There’s no historical record that the story of Rama and Sita ever took place.
I mean, it was stated that it happened 10 million years ago. Obviously, you wouldn't have proof point is to take moral of that.. it's not about its real or not
@@_philosopher_00 let’s face the facts: this is not based on any real historical fact but purely mythical. How can you explain the monkey god? A god who is a monkey?
@@MyHopeSide when you consider all life is equal just the tools they have is different, and with will and dedication anything can transcend to new heights. then you will understand it...
@@MyHopeSide i mean u think god has to be in shape of human..?
@@MyHopeSide Sanatan dharma teaches every life has potential to transcend the limits that nature set on them. that is the philosophy .. if you believe the rest or not it's up you... gods and stories are like hope and guidance on how to behave and be in the time of need
Sri Rama killed Vaali. 1st mistake.
Result, that vaali came as zara in next birth and sri rama came as sri krishna. Zara sent arrow on sri feet ending sri krishna life or made sri krishna to leave this earth.
Mother seetha was made to walk on fire in sri lanka. Which prooved her chastity. Again he cannot be test her, and he knew that. Sri Rama made 2nd mistake sending her in pregency to forest. Once she esablished dharma on fire, rama has not right to punish her for same doubt 2nd time. So she refused when sri rama went. And she went into earth, because rama failed to observe dharma which is much higher than kingdom or people of that country. Dharma is greatest than the whole world or people of that country. Dharma is collapsing nearing end of kaliyuga.
Rama should have gone along with her to forest for rest of his life.
Guru does not know the deapth of dharma. You know he rared chickens and ran poultry. Divine man cannot do this. Same Guru had wife who died or made story as samadhi. But guru did not pass on the information of his wife death to his fatherinlaw, who fell in great sorrow.
Anyone can see real gurus of past, never had anything, any attachment, no pomp abd show. Take 63 nayanmars of bgavan shiva or 13 alwars of sri vishnu. All of them lead abandoned life. Even recent, diamond merchant pattinathar, abandoned and went as begger. Nava Koti narayana 9 crores merchant of those days purander doss, walked away bear handed. He is telling inner engieering and twisting.
Yo chill guys y r u guys blaming lord Rama with no knowledge of their previous history . Lord Vishnu was cursed tht in his next life he wld live far frm his beloved m that's wt happnd Whn he took the birth as rama. He stayed away frm the one he loved and never married smone else . so pls . everything hppns for a reason . Sita knew all these and full filed her duty . staying with her brother valmiki during exile. It is said thr was nt a day rama Slpt without carrying the pain of sita in his heart . and once rama got his children he lost sita . hence his life was never easy to sit and judge. Not just sita went thru difficulties even rama did , his entire life . both didn't deserve wt they went thru
Muhammad nobody can dare to question him.
lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
He is not even worth of questioning 😂...
He is the kind of trash that we will have to question about any good values he had if any
You have to know everything from meditation
Only
Read sundarakanda
Agniparishka never happened
Even sitas abandon too
Read a thousand seeds of joy
Where godess lakshmi tells about Agniparishka concept it fake
Clearly she explained it
You have to know everything from meditation
Only
Read sundarakanda
Agniparishka never happened
Even sitas abandon too
Read a thousand seeds of joy
Where godess lakshmi tells about Agniparishka concept it fake
Clearly she explained it
And even the untold story of sita
Please read
Arey carry bhaiya!? 😂
This guru can twist. But dharma is there
Ram didn't sent sita to agnipariksha... Seetha herself did that
Indirectly he sent
stupid answer by sadhguru. a good leader doesn't just blindly listen to whatever anyone says and give in to rumours. a good leader can make their own judgements and decisions. and a good leader isn't someone who betrays their own family members just to maintain their position. that's an opportunist.
What is a husband s responsibility on his wife according to so called sanathana?.
Through out history people like sadguru try to misslead peopl ,and kept in darkness to survive the sanathana .
They people will find so many guilt in Lord Buddha,but a single in rama and Krishna and other sanathanic god men .this is really funny
Not a great answer
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
What a preposterous reasoning that defies the natural human sense of justice, logic and common sense. I am stunned by the insensitivity of Sadhguru to the suffering and feelings of Sita. And the applause from the audience at the end is frightening.
Sadguru is a sexist ....he is always been like that....in one video he said men should be careful about what kind of women they are are bringing home!!! What a nonsense statement so women should be dumb while choosing men? We are not some object which can be taken to someone's place....anyways Sadguru is also a human with flaws!!!
The spoilt kids are actually not reading the Ramayan, they are reading different perspectives of mind about Ramayan.
Idiots should think, either Ramayan is fake then all perspectives about it becomes pointless, or if that is true, before reading perspectives go and read the scriptures first.
May be if you read the scriptures, these evil perspectives and mindset would appear illogical to you
I think abandoning a wife like Sitaji is nowhere to be justified..... you are doing so because you know that your faith would be at stake and you are or never be ready to accept the harsh reality of Ramji
But 56 Year old man marrying 9 year old is to be justified?
Sadhguru is right. These 3 jackals are taking it too literally. Most of hinduism is symbolic
In Tulsi Ramayan, Ravan abducted Sita’s shadow. Lord Ram had asked Sita ji to stay hidden in Agni . So to bring her back after victory, he had to ask Agni Dev to give her back. Lord Ram never left Sita. It is a myth . Period
That's much fictional is in it...TulsiDas Heard Ramayan from Bir Hanuman , about this rahasya of keeping sita with agnidev that Ram told to lakhman in privately then how Hanuman knows that . If he knows then At the time of agni pariksha everybody should know about this secret of Chaya/Maya sita, so there will be no questions at all .
-- if I am wrong please correct me with reference because I am also victim of this secret of agni pariksha. Searching the write meanings with reference. *What was the secret & why agni pariksha* Jay Siya- Ram
Its not that Goddess Sita meant a lot to him, its that he knew that SHE is the real power. The same fetus he put Sita thru tests wrote his ending and probable hell for loser Rama
Heh?
@@keefefoster387412don't agree this man talk about sita exile.If anyone raped one girl .she is not criminal but she is victim. People Don't rights to blame victim. Ram also don't have any rights to gave agni pariksha. Ravan kidnap sita without her permission. So chances more he rape without her permission . This is very wrong . God test victim .it is right. Next I came to this man point . Ram send sita to valmiki ( brother)ashramThen what is this reason know only ram sita people talking rumors about sita .after this incident people strongly in her accusations about sita . Many more bad things spread about sita . Ram make sita is criminal infront of society. People believe ram Is incarnation ofKing ram is lord . Lord can do any injustice for any living organisms. So ram give extra sorrow for sita and inborn twins ( lava, kusa) . He spoiled child dignity .Next valmiki original name is ratnakar .actually he is theif before see ram and after see ram .he is devotee of her and ram give the name valmiki to her. Later period he wrote ramayan .he not brother of seetha ok. She is daughter of bhooma devi . ram didn't accept sita and her child still during last period ofshe living in this world she call her mother ( booma devi) and go with her . She proved her virgin the way of suicide. The reason is ram don't accept her child because of their political image.suppose he sent to brother home why he can't accept her child and she go her mother womb .next question is why luv and kush fight for ram action (sita exile) to ram and his brothers . Ram don't know her child or see her child after sitas delivery . Suppose he sent to her brother home then why he don't know who is her child .onematter is Clearly know ram give punishment to sita .not send her brothers house ok . If he save from people accusation then why he didnt sent sita to mithila *( mother home of sita ) that is palace all facilities in there but valmiki asram nothing equal to mithila . So don't hear this interviewer words please think this types of ways . ram all did for sita is save their own image from people. Or her prestige . He did for some in dhobhi wife. Dhobhi is not king of any kingdom. So it is not raj dharma also . Sugriva wife also kidnapped by vaali but he doesn't doubted his wife and he accepted his wife and he don't gave agni pariksha to hear rumor of people. Sugriva also king of one place. He has also have raj dharma ok.
😂😂😂 What A Stupid Answer 🤣
He did wrong, Period . There was absolutely no fault of Sita ji , absolutely zero , but she still paid for it , I don't care about the praja , because there are certain responsibilities of husband and certain responsibilities of a King, Obama didn't leave his wife to fulfill his duty as the president of the nation , i know this is Hindu's aastha , but Sita ji absolutely didn't deserve to go through Agni pariksha, and she didn't deserve to be abandoned , yes he brought her back from ravana but that doesn't give him the license to abandon her, congratulations to Rama ji , I can say he was the greatest king that ever lived but sorry he wasn't the greatest husband that ever lived , he wasn't at all .
Dumbest explanation ever heard about Sita jii exile
Very funny explanation..
Then what about the people's screeming when he was sending vanavasa. There people dont have any value😂😂.
Similar explanations from some other pandit jis ,make much fun.