Sita's chastity was questioned while Rama was walking on earth. If he did not make these harsh decisions, it would have continued beyond his time on earth. But, because he did what he did, not a single person has ever again questioned Sita's chastity. All the fingers that then pointed at Sita now point at Rama. Sita, went in history as a woman of unquestionable chastity, and Rama, despite all the suffering he endured to uphold Dharma, all his achievements, is still criticized for abandoning Sita. That was Rama's dedication for Sita.
Waah !! Also Rama's decision was ryt just imagine a who suffered all those hardships was now made an object of people's dirty rumors and court politics how hurtful must had it been for her ,so putting aside his heavy heart he let Sita get her freedom just so she doesn't become a broken marionette...
@@DieNetaDie Talks have initiated between India and Sri Lanka recently but not much has been finalised. On the other hand, India and Nepal had already signed the agreement.
@@SunilMeena-do7xn Thankfully, our common history is all around us and cannot be dinied. The only thing remaining seems for us Nepalies to do our part and return our country to being a Hindu Kingdom. :)
To the point with references. We cannot answer such questions until we understand the nuances of emotions going through his mind at that moment as a King.
Lord Rama loves Sita maa always. Even today everyone questions lord Rama decision and degrades him down just like this boy abhilash is doing ,going to everyone's comment section and replying with same words - reputation, etc etc.
@@82abhilash Who wants reputation? Does the God almighty who created everyone on earth want reputation? Your choice doesn't make any sense. God does not want reputation because God doesn't care about reputation. He only cares about the well-being of his creation, and that too, only for the good people; everyone else can go to hell for their karma. That's why God is always great and will always be great for eternity. Hail God almighty Rama.
I m 61 year old, I have learnt our Sanatani culture and Dharma FROM project shivoham, praveen Mohan, j sai deepak, Dr. Anand , Sri Ram Chakradhar, vinod Anna of String, I bow down to them.
@@papaRodanbecause the god you have talked about have given us a choice that we are allowed to pray to anyone as long as we do what is right and never go on the oath of wrongness
Even today, the other religion people troll many of the hindu Gods but no one says a single word against the character of sita... This was the actual intension of Srirama... He always wanted to safeguard her reputation...
She is actually protected by rama.. Questioning character of woman is just killing woman with no weapon.. This thing is understood by Lord Ram... He knows that she is fire and nothing can burn her.
@@ranirathi3379tell me one thing. If he wanted, he can enjoy with 100 s of virgin girls daily in his kingdom. But why did he fought for Sita and gathered army and built ramasethu for seetha even he don't know about her virginity?? He became villain for that then if he went kingdom without seeta he can enjoy as he wants
Actually he is doing his part in destroying it. Before people had confusion about his actions. Now that they know the release reason, they will have more reasons to dislike Rama.
@@82abhilash Nobody can dislike Lord Rama after reading the original Ramayana aka Valmiki Ramayana. It is literally impossible to dislike Rama especially after realising the fact that Lord Rama suffered because of us i.e humans.
@@jaydutta7711 Lord Rama suffered because he believed it lead him to greatness. It did not. Everyone knows that. Ultimately he committed suicide in shame.He did not suffer because of us. He suffered for the sake of his reputation. He was a slave of his reputation. He would have even sold his own mother for his reputation if it came to that. He certainly drove his brothers, his wife, his father and his devotees to suicide.
And as always thanks for uploading "Doc Film". Thats what i have been crying about since last 6-7 doc films.. this is what we look for in your documentaries. No rightist movement, no chellenges to Leftists.. Just pure and simple slap on the face of misunderstandings and misconceptions through Scriptures "As it is". i know from my heart deep down, "Buddhi" will become a socurce to go to for generations to come.... Bravo.. Your die hard fan.. UD....
The problem lies not only with those not reading the scriptures and understanding their essence,we have a leader who follows Gandhian idealogy which took us to the brink saying unabashedly what is there in the murthis and stones.? We are being pushed in to the same situation which led to the partition of this great country.
Jai Shree Ram. Whatever hardships that came his way, he always dealt it in a controlled manner, to spread Dharma. Shree Ram is a perfect role model for everyone.
Efforts are indeed commendable. Even though he does not realize it, he just proved what a loser Rama is. He abandoned his wife to protect his reputation and lost both wife and reputation. So, double loser.
@@82abhilash Mind your language 😡 How dare you to call an AVATAR of the Supreme God Vishnu a loser!!! ?? Lord Rama is a super Victorious Hero and he will always be for the eternity. If anyone read the original Ramayana aka Valmiki Ramayana, they cannot stop themselves from loving Lord Rama from the bottom of their heart. Hail Lord Rama 🙏
@@jaydutta7711 Sorry, he is not a loser. He is a double loser. He abandoned his wife to preserve his reputation and lost both his wife and his reputation. Finally he committed suicide, so triple loser. He is not an Avatar, he is not a supreme lord, he is a fake hero. Valmiki Ramayana reveals just as much. The only bigger losers are his devotees.
@@marymurphysinha9370 No sister. The video explains nothing. It is the same old pattern repeatedly mindlessly and without thought. Reading the Ramayana makes civilized people rightly disturbed. Because people don't actually believe that a married woman loses her chastity if she is raped. Do you believe that a married woman loses her chastity if she is raped?
Creating the Buddhi Playlist is indeed very commendable!👏 Thank you for this kind of a reference guide which will prove helpful to the current and future generations as well! Respect to you 🙏
I feel really bad for sita no matter what reasons you give that why ram left sita. Sita had suffered a lot. First without home, then without safety, then without husband and having 2 kids without her family. I hope her soul is fine!!
Ikr. No matter how much they say "Shri Ram felt very bad that he left sita in forest" Blah blah, it still doesn't justify the fact that mata sita had to endure so much torture both physically and mentally. A princess who had to endure manual work all her life after marriage 🙇🙌.
I understand. It is therefore I am told that to this day, parents do not name their newborn daughter child as Sita, fearing that she may face difficulties later in life. But Sita's story in itself is that of commitment (spent 14 years along with her husband in exile and in isolation in Lanka), motherhood (bringing up twins on her own) and sacrifice (not reuniting with her husband but letting the earth consume her mortally to return where originally she was found as child) . Many woman who have faced personal difficulties in their own life have drawn strength from that story to face them.
Waah !! Also Rama's decision was ryt just imagine a who suffered all those hardships was now made an object of people's dirty rumors and court politics how hurtful must had it been for her ,so putting aside his heavy heart he let Sita get her freedom just so she doesn't become a broken marionette...
*@pikachue602* Excuse me, Miss pikachue602. Don't judge Lord Rama by listening to the ranndom commentary from the internet. Do more research about Valmiki Ramayana before getting into your conclusion... Because according to Valmiki Ramayana Lord Rama never listened to any lies of people. Hence Lord Rama never questioned his wife i.e Sita's chastity. It was the people around Sita who raised question on her chastity because she was going to be a Queen of Ayodhya. And Lord Rama knew that Sita would understand, because, She as the queen has also got the responsibility of the state. Once, there is an image tarnishing question from the public, she cannot play deaf and continue being their queen. Even if the layman's question was answered by Rama and put an end there, there's no guarantee that the same question of Sita's chastity wouldn't arise in the future. Maa Sita understood that the only solution was to give Agnipariksha to prove her right because she knew that the God Vishnu will save her from the fire 🔥 obviously. And thus the fire test was Sita’s decision, not Rama’s. Lord Rama just saved her From the fire. And Sita's last sacrifice was also not for her own self respect, she was not that weak and helpless wóman that she'll sacrifice herself for the sake of her own self-respect. Sita sacrificed herself for not being able to tolerate the insult of her husband in front of her what he was witnessing from the thankless people of Ayodhya. That's what triggered Mata Sita to volunteer exist from her life to her eternal abode Vaikuntha. Don't forget Sita was an embodiment of a Goddess.
మీరు తెలుగు వారు అయినందుకు చాలా గర్వంగా ఉంది. మన తెలుగు వారు ఇంత లోతుగా శోధించి, మన హిందూ వాగ్మయాన్ని ప్రపంచానికి సరి అయిన రీతిలో, ఏ ఒక్క సూక్ష్మ లోపానికి తావు ఇయ్యక, సరళంగా అందరికీ అర్థం అవులాగున తయారు చేస్తున్నందుకు....పాదాభివందనాలు.
These aren't just stories, these are documentaries of life of that time and all the difficulties and personal crisis that came with maintaining the stability and integrity of that era so everyone can prosper.
No one prospers in a land where there is no justice for women. Read Ramayana till the end. Rama and his followers committed mass suicide. No one lived in Ayodhya city for a long time after that.
@@82abhilash Lord Rama is Supreme God Vishnu himself, and Vishnu can never fall from grace, regardless of his actions, as everything is created and governed by Vishnu. Therefore, I can confidently say that even though Uttarakhand is not authentic as it is not a part of Valmiki Ramayana, it played a crucial role in garnering more respect for Lord Rama. The individual who authored the Uttarakhand for Ramayana was undoubtedly in favor of Lord Rama and was a devoted follower of him.
This is what the God Rama wanted. He completely achieved his mission as a Great Husband and as a great Lover. God Rama has completely wiped out the blames on Sita Devi , instead, he created a sympathy on her by making Sita do Agni Pariksha and by sending her to the Valmiki ashram in the forest that he took all the blames on him which is actually happening right now that we are all pointing our fingers on Rama even after all these years as Ramayana was happened some lakhs of years ago, we're still blaming Rama but not Sita. Ram's mission achieved. Absolutely no doubt nobody could have loved Sita Devi so much as Ram did.Can't hold my tears anymore.
The people of Ayodhya didn't have any way to confirm that the blood line carried by Maa Sita is pure.....from their position the inheritor of Rama is going to become their King and they have a right question the purity of blood line as it was the only criteria to become a King and those times King was the fulcrum on which the whole society revolved.....the all powerful King
I watched Uttara ramayanam video both in English and Telugu. According to me it is the best documentary on Sri Valmiki Ramayanam with facts. Once again Thank you sir for encouraging me to Study Sri Valmiki Ramayanam, I'm currently in Kishkinda Kanda, Sir I request you to make a video on Kishkinda Kanda 40-43 Sarga. It describes the geography of the world at that time. I'm curious that are those places still exist today?? i'm trying to find out but I have limited resources and lack of sanskrit Knowledge to view another scripture. If you have time please do consider my request.
RAVAN kidnapped duplicate SITA MATA only as per TULSIDAS RAMAYANA GODDESS SITA MATA is a reincarnation of MAHAKALI MATA RAM RAJYA lasted for 11000 years as per BALMIKI RISHI….SITA MATA was never sent to forest again and was always with SHREE RAM….PRABHU RAM left with SITA MATA after 11000 years on their own decision….. Further TULSIDAS has written in his UTTARKAND RAMAYANA, that MULTIVERSE exists… multiple different AYODHYAS in various earth like planets, but only one SHREE RAM
@@rajeshkumar98769 oh God I don't want to argue whether Uttara Ramayanam is written by Valmiki Maharishi or not check his documentary then you will be clear or else even if you read Bala Kanda of Valmiki Ramayanam then you will get to know.
Uttara ramayanam is the reason that Rama fell from grace. It is not part of Tulasi Ramayan precisely because this truth had to be concealed. By the time of Tulasi Das, Ramayana was already unpopular. He revived it by writing in the local language and leaving the last book out.
My football coach used to take all the criticism of players performance on himself just to protect them from all the scrutiny from people.. My point is, Rama did exactly that to protect Ma Sita.. People now saying whatever they want to say to Rama, but no one is saying anything to Ma Sita.
There are some neo Buddhists who are started talking against sanatan Dharma. Plz make to Doc about to show the similarities between Sanatan Dharma & Buddhism.
In addition to my previous comment, it also reflects that the whole narrative is very emotionally made decision. Just like how many of us, who intend to be righteous and idealistic in nature, believe we are in the right path n this is how it will be right. But, while walking that path, we hurt a lot of those who are not on the same page even if they are right . May be in the assumption and presumption of us always trying to prove to be right, we too make mistakes. And sometimes really costly mistakes unaware of what to actually do! We are always forced to believe rama is a good boy and he listens to people n follows dharma. How can a good leader just be a listener. Shouldn’t be also carry his own opinions and influence people the right way to think and direct them towards growth? Similar examples are there in many stories, Like, Shakuntala Devi and her husband (how she was abandoned), Later, in Jodha Akbar (idk the exact factual info, but through the movie n some references, how Jodha was questioned and she left home n then Akbar went back to get her when he realised), So it’s always about a man committing a mistake in haste, or in the fear of society’s failure of judgement that a woman is questioned and punished! For a man to re-realise her worth n purity? It’s probably the repeated pattern n mistake . May be it’s time to advocate the righteousness by actually giving a direction to the society on how to judge, how to not fear society’s judgement, how to not misguide women to bear the wrath of all the patriarchal forces for her to still prove her innocence! It needs a severe change before propagating more on how it was righteous at all. May be the take away could just be, “A man like rama has also committed a mistake, and one must learn to not repeat the same pattern. Atleast rise up and be more bold to face the world together rather than making harsh self made decisions in the name of righteousness!
Rama was spineless enough to not show the true dharma to the public. Already Sita had done agnipariksha and the public still is questioning her chastity. The public will never learn and will gossip however much Rama do anything about it. Because that's how public are, they gossip and poke into things. And to implore further, imagine Sita was raped and to take it more further, imagine she got pregnant from that. Can Rama be the real Puroshottama and show to the people that it was not her fault. Even if her 'purity' is gone, it's not her fault and we must take care of the weak and the victims and not push them off like garbage. He could have showed a new and improved Dharma for his people. As Dharma keeps changing according to time and place, Dharma doesn't have to be a static entity. Rama was a coward and a fool. Coward for not doing the right thing. Fool for taking gossip among public seriously than teaching them about truth, critical thinking and empathy. End of story.
@@slowdown7276 I agree. I wouldn’t like to ill speak or call names. But it’s just not righteous from all the stories we have been listening to. This story always invokes the idea that only when a woman is put through misery from an external place, a man is willing to do whatever n sail oceans. But if it’s because of him? Is he willing to take the charge? That’s the only answer I’m waiting to know if this story has anything more to offer. If not, it’s not right.
your comments relieved me…yes why to get into that thinking of choosing between praja and wife. Why womens character is always in question. You being so powerful and enormous god couldnt save your wife from Ravan and later question her chastity. It hurts my heart..if a man like lord Ram couldn’t save Sita Ma ..then its better to be self reliant like Sita Ma who lived alone in Valmiki ashram and become self dependent..thats my take from Ramayan❤
Namaskaram Sir for the entire content, the new playlist titled "Buddhi" and your vast knowledge of exact studies and research explained in most simple loud-n-clear manner. Such inputs are most required for many like us to understand our basics well hence thank you and best wishes for your future endeavors JaiSreeRam
What very few people do not understand is that Sita-Rama together are the Supreme Personality of Godhead. You can't separate the two. Can you separate the sun from the sunshine? Lord Rama is Shakti-man and Mother Sita is Shakti, you can never separate them from each other. From our distorted perspective, it may appear that Lord Rama has separated from Mother Sita, but in reality it is not possible. From our perspective it may seem that the sun is born from the sea, but in reality the sun is far away and untouched by the sea. Hare Krishna! 🙏
Bringing our historical and cultural heritages with easy to follow narratives including proper sloka references, Commendable Job, Hats off to you. Please continue with your great work
The morality of the story is that a Ruler should serve the interests and the demands of its people first, Just like a President or a PM. And this is why Rama has to turn back Sita to meet the disapproval and suspicions of his people. The story revolves around Raj Dharma, If Rama as a King didn't banish Sita, he would have lost all respect and dignity in the society as a Ruler. What is the Duty of a King to serve the interests and the demands of his people first, not to be self-centered and become a family man.
Sir, one clarification: when someone comments on the queen, is it not the king's duty to explain what has actually happened instead of going by what was commented. In general, kings needs to analyze the statement made by any person ( sita, in this context) and rama needs to explain it to the person who commented. If he punished sita by hearing some words by a random person, then it may prove that the person who commented is right. I am just thinking that the king could have gone as per dharma by proving/disproving the statement in the court before taking the decision.. please help me to understand this concept
See, from what I understand, politically there are some rules that a ruler must follow for the dharma to function properly, it's not as simple as just proving his point and moving on. Rama is a king, not a commoner. For instance, if you look at this scenario from today's point of view, why do we think our government doesn't accept the women back who were forced to join ISIS, but have now realized and want to return. The women's parents still plead our government to bring them back. Why do you think our government doesn't consider their pleas? They are brain washed people, they may pose a threat to the country in the future. It's for the safety and security of the country. Similarly, maa Sita was in captivity with the enemy country as well. The women who were in captivity in Syria were common people. But, in Rama's scenario, Maa Seeta was going to become queen and rule the country, probably a major part of the earth, back then. How serious should a king be about this? After the abduction of Seeta, it's become a political thing now, no more a personal issue for Rama. She is his dear wife and he knows very well about her, but there's nothing personal for a ruler who puts his life before his country. Another point in my understanding is, it's not good for the king to have emotional weaknesses any time in his life. It's very dangerous and there's 100% chance for the enemy countries to take advantage of this. So, it's very important for Rama to prove to his citizens that he has no personal weaknesses, and his country's well being is his foremost responsibility. It's the personal sacrifice a king has done for his dharma as a ruler of a country. Rama is dharma personified, that's the greatness of our Rama.🙏
RAVAN kidnapped duplicate SITA MATA only as per TULSIDAS RAMAYANA GODDESS SITA MATA is a reincarnation of MAHAKALI MATA RAM RAJYA lasted for 11000 years as per BALMIKI RISHI….SITA MATA was never sent to forest again and was always with SHREE RAM….PRABHU RAM left with SITA MATA after 11000 years on their own decision….. Further TULSIDAS has written in his UTTARKAND RAMAYANA, that MULTIVERSE exists… multiple different AYODHYAS in various earth like planets, but only one SHREE RAM
I think i might have a good enough explanation...at least something which satisfies me and makes sense. After the war, lord rama and maata sita were coronated king and queen. There was celebration all around in Ayodhya! And the epic of lord ram's battle against raavana spread like wildfire. And of course people, i assume, got to know about maata sita's agni-pravesha which was proof enough of her chastity and purity. But you see my friend, we live in a society and so did the people at that time. Gossip is not something one can really fight against, it's a coward of an enemy, but unkillable all the same, immortal even. And people gossiped, in-spite of the truth. And the dhobi was just more vocal than your average citizen but even he ,I assume, would falter and curse himself for saying what he did if he actually met lord rama and maata sita in person. Lord rama heard about the way the public talked about his wife, the queen and questioned her chastity. How do you think he felt about it? for a man who had been through so much suffering, even going as far as to indirectly make maata sita, his love, his wife, his very life undergo an agni-pravesha just for the sake of his people so that they never doubt her, this must've been absolutely heart wrenching. Rama failed. The scion of ikshvaku, the very incarnation of Mahavishnu, the preserver, was defeated. Now, could he have given an explanation? absolutely so! punished the dhobi and whoever else for talking ill about the queen? i mean Rama would never have even thought about it but you know how cruel kings can be! But one must realize that the agni-pravesha was the absolute pinnacle of proof and nothing could top that. So rama did the one thing only he could. He sent maata sita away. And look at all the hate he gets even now for what he did. Does anyone ever question maata sita's chastity now in modern times? No. But do some people absolutely abhor lord ram? Yes , and so did i for a long time now! That is how great Lord rama is! Some might say he failed as a husband, but i think not. if anything he failed in love, he couldn't be with his beloved but he made sure that her honour was intact and he beared the brunt of misfortune. It has taken me literal years to understand our lord's actions. JAI SHRE RAM!
@@achyuthanand5006 Yes, Rama did not fail. Atleast for maa Sita, Rama is never a failure, and Rama knows that. But, inspite of sacrificing so much, the society still judges him. As far as his love for his wife is concerned, who are we as a society to judge. This society never understands. Rama after he orders Lakshman to leave her in the forest, also makes sure that she's left nearby Rishi Valmiki's ashram so she'd be taken care of. People don't recognize these gestures and still judge his love towards his wife. One can understand Rama only by reading Valmiki Ramayan. Even I used to argue a lot with my mother when young. But now I understand that people need to have lot of maturity to understand both "Raja Ram" and "Sita Ram".
Sir, great job . Crystal clear explanation, very much needed now a days. Mee prayathnam ,, mee khushi vela kattalenidhi . Awareness is important 👏 thank u for Buddhi
Despite everything being explained well in the video, people are still asking stupid questions. Many times the circumstances are such where the difference between righteousness and unrighteousness becomes very less, in that situation Shri Ram took a decision which a common man can never take. If today's young generation is so stupid that they cannot understand this, then it is not the fault of Shri Ram. (The respect for Shri Ram has increased in my heart) I don't know whether Ramayana is true or not, I maintain a neutral viewpoint between theists and atheists. But after reading Ramayana from beginning to end, there is no doubt left in my mind about the character of Lord Rama. I respect Shri Ram and will always do so.
Nuvvu “ Kaarana Janmudavu “ naayana. You were sent to this God’s green Earth for a reason and you are truly making an impact. There are no words to thank you for what you are doing and what you have done so far to bring the eternal knowledge of our Santana Dharma to the fore and educate millions of people. Kudos Shri Gurubhyo Namaha
A salute to your analysis of Ramayana. Rama was Dharmatma and he followed Raja dharma and abandoned Sita who was pregnant without even telling her. This act of Rama was not an injustice to Sita? If Rama loved Sita so much why didn't he sacrificed the throne and went with Sita???
Instead of blaming us, human, who unknowingly accused Sita just because words from that washman and it's the real reason of why she's banished, we blame Rama, how irony... And I said this as a 21 y.o. Thai girl who struggling on learning India culture but at least really into it. Plus I love Ramayana since I was a little child.
Uttar kand (referred to here as Uttar Ramayan) is not part of original Valmiki Ramayan. It has been added later to satisfy the questions and curiosities of people. The style of the shlokas in Uttar Kand added in Valmiki is also very different to all other kands. It genuinely only appears in Tulsi Ramayan.
Thanks to this channel I had the motivation of reading a Critical Translation in English of the Valmiki Ramayana. I just finished the first two Kandas: Bala Kanda and Ayodhya Kanda. Going to the source has been an eye opener on Rama's personality, all the people around him and important events that happened in these two first parts. This topic about leaving Sita is quite contentious, because of the historic context when it happened. I'm looking forward to read everything myself to come to my own conclusions, based upon the values of Sanatana Dharma, my own knowledge and the ancienct wisdom of Bharat. Thanks for another great short docu.
@@nalinakshitr5424 Namaste! I'm not a bro, I'm a sis 😂. I'm reading Valmiki Ramayana with the translation by Bibek Debroy from the Sanskrit Critical Edition.
This series ' Buddhi ' is something will be a game changer for your channel , it should be focused towards breaking myths and bringing the sanatanis of all castes together , Sadhuvaad to the punyaaatma within you
If Sita had to do Agni Pareeksha, Ram should have joined Sita as well. Just like when they were married, when they were tied together and circled Agnideva for their everlasting love. If people questioned Sita's character, did they not question Ram's character as well. Even he was without Sita for the same amount of time, his purity could also be questioned. If we consider Ram ji as the ideal human, then how come he is falling in the trap of "Chaar log kya kahenge"? Women have been suppressed so much for so long and even now we are not questioning our beliefs bases. I have seen your other works. Thank you so much for educating the masses with our Dharma. Hopefully we all find our Paramaatman!
Rama's character is not questioned because he had already put in enormous effort in travelling across lands and in crossing the sea to find Sita and then putting his life in danger in a battle to rescue her. Do you think that a man who had a slept with another woman in his wife's absence would do that ? Is so, then you are not in reality. Secondly, it is not about an individual worrying about what "Chaar log kya kahenge". Rama was a king bearing responsibilities of the Kingdom on his shoulder and he wanted to fulfill that with the trust of the people of his kingdom that loved him dearly.
A really important subject you are discussing here. This is simply something outstanding. Please keep this effort up to make the PROGRESSIVE HINDUs (as they explain and think themselves uselessly) understand that they are far far far behind the real knowledge of SANATAN DHARMA.
Bro please do a video on earth shape in hindu scriptures and planets described by Hindu scriptures. Difference between the words. 1) bhugol- sphere 2) bhumandal- circular plane 3) bhulokh- plane of existence or dimension. Each word is used in different places of our scriptures So please do a video on earths shape in Hinduism.with scripture references Please clarify this
Raam never leaved ma sita. All ramayna written before 11th ce doesnt have last kand its complated after raam return to ayodhya. Oldest ramayna found is belonge to 6th ce which doesnt have last kand and also all expart axcept that baal kand and uttar kand were add after and not the part of original valmiki ramayna. If u buy valmiki ramayna today and open first page 3 page its written that all expert says that baal kand and uttar kand were not the part of original ramayna and the give many example for that. Writting were completly drifrent and cant be written by sage valmiki. Many example given in first 3 pages of valmiki ramayna even today eara any body can read it.
Lord Rama knew fully well Sita Devi was virtuous. He cared more about his image with rumor mongers than his duty to his wife and his wedding wows. Nevertheless, Rama is beloved for his far greater virtues.
See the movie young Victoria. In the movie while going in horse carriage with husband people comment that he husband is waste. Hearing that she goes back to palace and gives him portfolio to upkeep museums. So this happens even in modern times. I understood site being left behind only after seeing that movie.
I don't think uttar kanda was originally part of Valmiki Ramayana. It was added later even Gita press publication mentions this as disputed among scholars . Which means Valmiki Ramayana ends with Lanka kand .
First of all, Shri Ram never left her in Forests as many people claim, his order was clear that she should be sent at the hermitage of Valmiki ji, and as per Anand Ramayan he discussed with Sita's parents to live with her in and take care of her, he clearly ordered to make all the arrangements for her so that she doesn't have to face any discomfort, yet he took all the blame on himself. This is how loving husband Shri Ram is❤
Thanks for your videos sir 🙏🙏🙏 Please do a very detailed video on Sundarakanda. . I want to listen on a regular basis and want to apply in my daily life both in personal and professional contexts. Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏🙏
Few people say that Maa Sita was under the protection of Agni dev and Ravana had kidnapped Maya Sita. How far is this true? If yes, what is the supporting text?
@@rajeshkumar98769 but Valmiki Ramayan is more authentic and don't think there is a mention. Also if you read about Vedavati, she had cursed Ravana that a woman will be reason of his downfall. And it is said she took rebirth as Mata Sita
the easiest way one could understand the thing is... a female cant be accepted if she's been with another guy... back then.. those 1600 girls were kidnapped n forcefully married to a demon.. when krishna killed the demon.. n freed those women.. society wasnt ready to accept them... so krishna accepted them as his part of life ( not exactly wives) but to live n spend lives together woih him.. its not 16k its 1600..
Thank you sooooo much for addressing this in your video's; I have been asking this question to family for years, right. I cannot believe that you could/would watch your spouse, whom you are devoted to burn to death in front of your very eyes. Regardless of Dharma, it is hard to comprehend, they had satvic powers through years of meditation etc., so, I believe, that Lord Rama would have known deep down within, that Ma Sita was completely innocent and utterly devoted to him. Makes me cry just thinking about it, so sad, truly. I will definitely be subscribing to your other channel. Namaste from the UK & JSR!
Jai sitaram Both are one Like lord shiva Parvathi Sri Rama loves Sita matha more than anyone Today everyone are pointing on the great Lord Ram No one can be lordram We all believe Sita mata as great godess Great women Though Lord ram is great today some people are pointing Lord Ram decisions He is one ,he is great He killed Ravana and brought sitha matha back No king would do this thing When Ravana kidnaped Sita mata Lord ram cried a lot If Lordram is a judgemental person towards Sita mata Then he don't cry and search for Sita mata Then only he leaves Sita mata But no Lord ram is great he killed Ravana and protected his wife According to valamiki ramayana LORD RAM IS GREAT HUMAN AND GREAT KING We all should know our hindu stories too Purananas too each and every purana Dasavataram Mathya avatar Karma avatar Varahaa avatar Narshimha avatar Parasurama avatar Vamana avatar Sri Rama chandra avatar Sri krishna avatar Buddha avatar Kalki avatar If you study Dasavataram stories Then you can understand the greatness of lordram and his decisions towards Sita mata Lord Ram is Lord Vishnu avatar Godess sita is Godess lakshmi God is great Lakshminarayana Sitaram As a king he took that decision to send Sita mata to forest But as a husband he cried more more more for Sita mata He love Sita mata Sita mata loves Ram They both are one Even while performing yagna He brought a golden statue of Sita mata That is greatness of lordram Just some people are pointing on lordram Without knowing the truth The God Love The god play The god ideas There is a big reason behind it Some people see Lord ram as human and a great king Some people see Lord ram as god He is absolutely god The great lordram By watching some movies or some serials People started to judge even Lordram How foolish is it He is our Lordram One and only one Whatever lordram does Is absolutely right If he didn't take agniparishka decisions and sending sita mata to forest even still today also People Jude Sita mata purity At Ramayana time there is no TV or internet to understand and show the agniparishka to each and every citizen Even Lord ram didn't take the decisions towards Sita mata Even today also we all judge sita mata character But without any doubt We all praise Sita mata as maha pathivratha We all feel sad about her Because she suffered a lot We all judge Lordram for his decisions But we never judge Sita mata So please try to understand There is one and only one great king Great human Great Husband Great god Lord Ram Sri Rama chandra prabhu Jai ho Sri Rama chandra Prabhu ki Jai Jai Jai sitaram
I still strongly object to Rama's decision. The main question is not whether he loved Sita but if he was indeed a righteous king at all in this context. He knew very well that Sita was chaste, but his subjects were suspicious of her character. So, as a wise king, he should have called a public meeting and have it declared explicitly that Sita was chaste (repeating this exercise if needed), thus putting an end to the rumors. He should have also made it clear that even if Sita did sit on Ravana's thighs (or did anything that questioned her character), that would have been under coercion and thus would not qualify as a situation for judging her character. If he had pressed that conviction, he would have set a very good example of a king working as a social reformer. But alas, he "feared" speaking to his extremely loyal subjects and undertook this very anti-heroic action of exiling his wife (and eventually regretting it).
Can you explain this to todays public by talking... Suppose you are at a very high position and your wife goes through same allegations...then??? Do you think you will explain people that she is chaste and more to it will they believe?? Do you really think so ?? I don't think so... Yes it was a very harsh descision but he had no option...
@@hedwig6643 My wife's charcater is no one else's business. Only mine. Mine alone. What any one else has to say does not matter. Jashodaben may or maynot be a whore, Narendra Modi is judged only for his performance.
Thank you. Your efforts to provide us with a straightforward meaning of this event in Ramayanam is much appreciated. Hoping people will understand the meaning of "righteousness".
THANK YOU...SIR... AGAIN...!!! I, the continuous learning student, wrote a comment about that important Question for your previous lecture. But in summary : It was the duty of the SHRI RAMAN TO FULLFILL THE DHARMAM... AND MA- SITA WAS HIS OTHER PART...TO BE THE TOOL TO HELP HIM TO DO THAT...!!! Therefore both are in it... and they are ONE... Completing eachother...!!! THANKS AGAIN...!!!
I think we need to change the perpective of seing thing..anything that written by our ancestors does not only have one meaning..it have internal meaning The whole ramayan was about human soul reaching back to the eternal god 1.rama-the god 2.sita-human soul 3.laksmana-awareness 4.ravanan - ego 5.14 years of exile-symbolism of when a soul and body is togather--human,the life is full of problems 6.the golden dear-maya 7.agni pravesham-when u soul(sita) is capture by ego(ravana), the soul need to get rid of the impurities and god only accept our pure soul back,agni is said to be pure in ancient The whole story of ramanyan is telling u when a soul takes a human body,it will go through hurdles ( suffering),when a human get attracted by maya(gold deer),there is where god goes out(rama went out)and ego(ravana) start to creep in..yet our awareness( lakshmana protection) will try to protect us,but still the soul will be attracted by maya...in order to let go ego and maya, a person need to undergo a big process(war) and strong faith in god(how sita have faith in rama,only think of rama)..still after the war, u soul will be testify for purity ( agni praksha) Hope this doesnt hurt anyone and just a small sharing and look at our ancestor view different...
What do you mean by "pure". Are you talking about purity in body or mind? Sita was not raped. Sita was pure in body and mind, still Rama abandoned her because she was suspected of having an impure body, not an impure mind. Is that enough reason to abandon your wife. Let us assume that she has an impure body. Is the impurity because of rape of adultery. If it was adultery, then she had both impure body and mind. But the purity of her mind was never in question. So it was always about her body. Let us assume that she was actually raped. She will have an impure body but a pure mind. Enough reason to abandon?
It just pains me to know My Shri Ram had to suffer like that because of the society. And Mata Sita I don't how she felt about this whole blame game by stupid people. I have never read or Heard anything about her opinion. Still they both suffered.🤧😭💔
@@sneed1764 dharma isn't a set of rules... It varies from person to person... Yet the karma of a being decides the future... As a king, ram choose dharma.. even knowing that his karma gonna cost him everything.. but yet for the sake of Kingdom n societies he choosed what was the most right thing that time..
@@sneed1764 n see the most profound impact of ramayan on societies n civilization of bharat is that... If one couple marries they tend to live eachother for rest of their lives.... Yes it seems opposite to the karma of sri ram but not the values addressed by Sri ramayan
Sir the reason of shri ram leaving sita while she was pregnant is mentioned in Padam puran, Patalkhand, adhyay 125, Page no: 518,519,520 (geeta press gorakhpur) Here it is told that mata sita was cursed by a parrot the she will have to bear the pain of separation from her husband during her pregnancy as she was forcefully trying to keep that parrot in same situation.
Sita's chastity was questioned while Rama was walking on earth. If he did not make these harsh decisions, it would have continued beyond his time on earth. But, because he did what he did, not a single person has ever again questioned Sita's chastity. All the fingers that then pointed at Sita now point at Rama. Sita, went in history as a woman of unquestionable chastity, and Rama, despite all the suffering he endured to uphold Dharma, all his achievements, is still criticized for abandoning Sita. That was Rama's dedication for Sita.
Well said 🙏🕉☀
Waah !! Also Rama's decision was ryt just imagine a who suffered all those hardships was now made an object of people's dirty rumors and court politics how hurtful must had it been for her ,so putting aside his heavy heart he let Sita get her freedom just so she doesn't become a broken marionette...
😭
❤
True said
Hi from Nepal.
That is why Ram Rajya is Ram Rajya..
OM
And so happy about Bhagwan Ram's temple at his birthplace.
There is also Remayana Circuit being developed at India-Nepal border.
@@SunilMeena-do7xn
That sounds nice. And is Sri Lanka included?
🙏
@@DieNetaDie Talks have initiated between India and Sri Lanka recently but not much has been finalised. On the other hand, India and Nepal had already signed the agreement.
@@SunilMeena-do7xn Thankfully, our common history is all around us and cannot be dinied. The only thing remaining seems for us Nepalies to do our part and return our country to being a Hindu Kingdom. :)
To the point with references. We cannot answer such questions until we understand the nuances of emotions going through his mind at that moment as a King.
No nuances. He just wants reputation. That too only his, everyone else can go to hell.
Lord Rama loves Sita maa always. Even today everyone questions lord Rama decision and degrades him down just like this boy abhilash is doing ,going to everyone's comment section and replying with same words - reputation, etc etc.
@@82abhilash Who wants reputation? Does the God almighty who created everyone on earth want reputation? Your choice doesn't make any sense. God does not want reputation because God doesn't care about reputation. He only cares about the well-being of his creation, and that too, only for the good people; everyone else can go to hell for their karma. That's why God is always great and will always be great for eternity. Hail God almighty Rama.
I m 61 year old, I have learnt our Sanatani culture and Dharma FROM project shivoham, praveen Mohan, j sai deepak, Dr. Anand , Sri Ram Chakradhar, vinod Anna of String, I bow down to them.
why not bow to only one almighty? why do we bow to every god, lord or avatars of God. why not just GOD. please answer
@@papaRodanbecause the god you have talked about have given us a choice that we are allowed to pray to anyone as long as we do what is right and never go on the oath of wrongness
@@arjun_aashu where did he said this may i know any verse from veda or puran?
boycott adipurush. how shamelessly the film is insulting our culture, raavan is made to look like a cringe tiktoker. no words
Even today, the other religion people troll many of the hindu Gods but no one says a single word against the character of sita...
This was the actual intension of Srirama... He always wanted to safeguard her reputation...
safeguard her REPUTATION, not HERSELF? nice.
@@ranirathi3379 HER reputation was an important part of HERSELF... Even Sita cared about Lord Rama's reputation. It was a mutual decision.
I think for women or men their character and reputation is highest
She is actually protected by rama.. Questioning character of woman is just killing woman with no weapon.. This thing is understood by Lord Ram... He knows that she is fire and nothing can burn her.
@@ranirathi3379tell me one thing. If he wanted, he can enjoy with 100 s of virgin girls daily in his kingdom. But why did he fought for Sita and gathered army and built ramasethu for seetha even he don't know about her virginity?? He became villain for that then if he went kingdom without seeta he can enjoy as he wants
thank u for reviving our culture and history
Actually he is doing his part in destroying it. Before people had confusion about his actions. Now that they know the release reason, they will have more reasons to dislike Rama.
@@82abhilash Nobody can dislike Lord Rama after reading the original Ramayana aka Valmiki Ramayana. It is literally impossible to dislike Rama especially after realising the fact that Lord Rama suffered because of us i.e humans.
@@jaydutta7711 Lord Rama suffered because he believed it lead him to greatness. It did not. Everyone knows that. Ultimately he committed suicide in shame.He did not suffer because of us. He suffered for the sake of his reputation. He was a slave of his reputation. He would have even sold his own mother for his reputation if it came to that. He certainly drove his brothers, his wife, his father and his devotees to suicide.
@@user-zo9jc2ng6f You have no IQ to destroy. So you just copy paste emoticons.
@@82abhilashbausdike tere baap ne suicide commit,Kiya hoga na kyuki teri ma ne terko kuch sikhaya nahi
And as always thanks for uploading "Doc Film". Thats what i have been crying about since last 6-7 doc films.. this is what we look for in your documentaries. No rightist movement, no chellenges to Leftists.. Just pure and simple slap on the face of misunderstandings and misconceptions through Scriptures "As it is". i know from my heart deep down, "Buddhi" will become a socurce to go to for generations to come.... Bravo.. Your die hard fan.. UD....
The problem lies not only with those not reading the scriptures and understanding their essence,we have a leader who follows Gandhian idealogy which took us to the brink saying unabashedly what is there in the murthis and stones.? We are being pushed in to the same situation which led to the partition of this great country.
Who's that leader?
@@naraendrareddy273 Hindu hriday samrat.
@@hanumanthji Don't beat around the bush...be clear! Have guts to name the name, unless you are fearful of the shame.
Why insulting sita, who is she did anyone know..she itself God . ..she will destroy bad karma.she is the mother of all creatures on earth.
Dear Moron, If that's so, why is he worshipping at every temple?
Jai Shree Ram. Whatever hardships that came his way, he always dealt it in a controlled manner, to spread Dharma. Shree Ram is a perfect role model for everyone.
@minni5503 I agree.
Your efforts are commendable, really how naive we are, lacking knowledge about our own culture. Kudos sir 👏 🙌
Efforts are indeed commendable. Even though he does not realize it, he just proved what a loser Rama is. He abandoned his wife to protect his reputation and lost both wife and reputation. So, double loser.
@@82abhilash Mind your language 😡 How dare you to call an AVATAR of the Supreme God Vishnu a loser!!! ?? Lord Rama is a super Victorious Hero and he will always be for the eternity. If anyone read the original Ramayana aka Valmiki Ramayana, they cannot stop themselves from loving Lord Rama from the bottom of their heart. Hail Lord Rama 🙏
@@jaydutta7711 Sorry, he is not a loser. He is a double loser. He abandoned his wife to preserve his reputation and lost both his wife and his reputation. Finally he committed suicide, so triple loser. He is not an Avatar, he is not a supreme lord, he is a fake hero. Valmiki Ramayana reveals just as much. The only bigger losers are his devotees.
@@82abhilashThis is what happens when no one reads Ramayana. Everything has been explained in this video, still you are talking nonsense.
@@marymurphysinha9370 No sister. The video explains nothing. It is the same old pattern repeatedly mindlessly and without thought. Reading the Ramayana makes civilized people rightly disturbed. Because people don't actually believe that a married woman loses her chastity if she is raped. Do you believe that a married woman loses her chastity if she is raped?
Creating the Buddhi Playlist is indeed very commendable!👏 Thank you for this kind of a reference guide which will prove helpful to the current and future generations as well! Respect to you 🙏
I feel really bad for sita no matter what reasons you give that why ram left sita. Sita had suffered a lot. First without home, then without safety, then without husband and having 2 kids without her family. I hope her soul is fine!!
Ikr. No matter how much they say "Shri Ram felt very bad that he left sita in forest" Blah blah, it still doesn't justify the fact that mata sita had to endure so much torture both physically and mentally. A princess who had to endure manual work all her life after marriage 🙇🙌.
I understand. It is therefore I am told that to this day, parents do not name their newborn daughter child as Sita, fearing that she may face difficulties later in life. But Sita's story in itself is that of commitment (spent 14 years along with her husband in exile and in isolation in Lanka), motherhood (bringing up twins on her own) and sacrifice (not reuniting with her husband but letting the earth consume her mortally to return where originally she was found as child) . Many woman who have faced personal difficulties in their own life have drawn strength from that story to face them.
The amount of clarity you provide is impeccable. Continue the good work 👏👏👏
No clarity. Just a tired old talking point.
Waah !! Also Rama's decision was ryt just imagine a who suffered all those hardships was now made an object of people's dirty rumors and court politics how hurtful must had it been for her ,so putting aside his heavy heart he let Sita get her freedom just so she doesn't become a broken marionette...
*@pikachue602* Excuse me, Miss pikachue602. Don't judge Lord Rama by listening to the ranndom commentary from the internet. Do more research about Valmiki Ramayana before getting into your conclusion... Because according to Valmiki Ramayana Lord Rama never listened to any lies of people. Hence Lord Rama never questioned his wife i.e Sita's chastity. It was the people around Sita who raised question on her chastity because she was going to be a Queen of Ayodhya. And Lord Rama knew that Sita would understand, because, She as the queen has also got the responsibility of the state. Once, there is an image tarnishing question from the public, she cannot play deaf and continue being their queen. Even if the layman's question was answered by Rama and put an end there, there's no guarantee that the same question of Sita's chastity wouldn't arise in the future. Maa Sita understood that the only solution was to give Agnipariksha to prove her right because she knew that the God Vishnu will save her from the fire 🔥 obviously. And thus the fire test was Sita’s decision, not Rama’s. Lord Rama just saved her From the fire.
And Sita's last sacrifice was also not for her own self respect, she was not that weak and helpless wóman that she'll sacrifice herself for the sake of her own self-respect. Sita sacrificed herself for not being able to tolerate the insult of her husband in front of her what he was witnessing from the thankless people of Ayodhya. That's what triggered Mata Sita to volunteer exist from her life to her eternal abode Vaikuntha. Don't forget Sita was an embodiment of a Goddess.
@@jaydutta7711when did she sacrificed herself?
this is very much needed in our time and age. a moral dilemma about duty is fundamental to understand these stories
No moral dilemma. What Rama did was highly immoral. Future generations will do abhisheka of his murthy in their own urine.
@@82abhilash communists ka 14
This man really needs more subscribers and need to gain more reach ....share his channel to ur frnds and make him grow my frnds
మీరు తెలుగు వారు అయినందుకు చాలా గర్వంగా ఉంది. మన తెలుగు వారు ఇంత లోతుగా శోధించి, మన హిందూ వాగ్మయాన్ని ప్రపంచానికి సరి అయిన రీతిలో, ఏ ఒక్క సూక్ష్మ లోపానికి తావు ఇయ్యక, సరళంగా అందరికీ అర్థం అవులాగున తయారు చేస్తున్నందుకు....పాదాభివందనాలు.
🕉️🚩
@project shivoham please colloborate with team prachyam...you can make wonders🙏🏻❤️🇮🇳
These aren't just stories, these are documentaries of life of that time and all the difficulties and personal crisis that came with maintaining the stability and integrity of that era so everyone can prosper.
No one prospers in a land where there is no justice for women. Read Ramayana till the end. Rama and his followers committed mass suicide. No one lived in Ayodhya city for a long time after that.
@@82abhilash Lord Rama is Supreme God Vishnu himself, and Vishnu can never fall from grace, regardless of his actions, as everything is created and governed by Vishnu. Therefore, I can confidently say that even though Uttarakhand is not authentic as it is not a part of Valmiki Ramayana, it played a crucial role in garnering more respect for Lord Rama. The individual who authored the Uttarakhand for Ramayana was undoubtedly in favor of Lord Rama and was a devoted follower of him.
This is what the God Rama wanted. He completely achieved his mission as a Great Husband and as a great Lover. God Rama has completely wiped out the blames on Sita Devi , instead, he created a sympathy on her by making Sita do Agni Pariksha and by sending her to the Valmiki ashram in the forest that he took all the blames on him which is actually happening right now that we are all pointing our fingers on Rama even after all these years as Ramayana was happened some lakhs of years ago, we're still blaming Rama but not Sita. Ram's mission achieved. Absolutely no doubt nobody could have loved Sita Devi so much as Ram did.Can't hold my tears anymore.
The people of Ayodhya didn't have any way to confirm that the blood line carried by Maa Sita is pure.....from their position the inheritor of Rama is going to become their King and they have a right question the purity of blood line as it was the only criteria to become a King and those times King was the fulcrum on which the whole society revolved.....the all powerful King
This is a really good point that people fail to see
@@ashgoku6966proves how dumb those people were didn't even know about DNA 😂😂😂
I watched Uttara ramayanam video both in English and Telugu. According to me it is the best documentary on Sri Valmiki Ramayanam with facts. Once again Thank you sir for encouraging me to Study Sri Valmiki Ramayanam, I'm currently in Kishkinda Kanda, Sir I request you to make a video on Kishkinda Kanda 40-43 Sarga. It describes the geography of the world at that time. I'm curious that are those places still exist today?? i'm trying to find out but I have limited resources and lack of sanskrit Knowledge to view another scripture. If you have time please do consider my request.
Watch Nilesh nilkanth oak video on it and also on Mahabharat geography
@@nishantketu1174 Can you please share the link?
RAVAN kidnapped duplicate SITA MATA only as per TULSIDAS RAMAYANA
GODDESS SITA MATA is a reincarnation of MAHAKALI MATA
RAM RAJYA lasted for 11000 years as per BALMIKI RISHI….SITA MATA was never sent to forest again and was always with SHREE RAM….PRABHU RAM left with SITA MATA after 11000 years on their own decision…..
Further TULSIDAS has written in his UTTARKAND RAMAYANA, that MULTIVERSE exists… multiple different AYODHYAS in various earth like planets, but only one SHREE RAM
@@rajeshkumar98769 oh God I don't want to argue whether Uttara Ramayanam is written by Valmiki Maharishi or not check his documentary then you will be clear or else even if you read Bala Kanda of Valmiki Ramayanam then you will get to know.
Uttara ramayanam is the reason that Rama fell from grace. It is not part of Tulasi Ramayan precisely because this truth had to be concealed. By the time of Tulasi Das, Ramayana was already unpopular. He revived it by writing in the local language and leaving the last book out.
My football coach used to take all the criticism of players performance on himself just to protect them from all the scrutiny from people..
My point is, Rama did exactly that to protect Ma Sita..
People now saying whatever they want to say to Rama, but no one is saying anything to Ma Sita.
Btw there is ram mandir and not Sita mandir that says it all.
@@geetashishir ummm ever went to nepal ?
Doing great job Project Shivoham 👍!!!!
Keep up the good work Project Shivoham 💪💐
There are some neo Buddhists who are started talking against sanatan Dharma. Plz make to Doc about to show the similarities between Sanatan Dharma & Buddhism.
In addition to my previous comment, it also reflects that the whole narrative is very emotionally made decision.
Just like how many of us, who intend to be righteous and idealistic in nature, believe we are in the right path n this is how it will be right.
But, while walking that path, we hurt a lot of those who are not on the same page even if they are right .
May be in the assumption and presumption of us always trying to prove to be right, we too make mistakes.
And sometimes really costly mistakes unaware of what to actually do!
We are always forced to believe rama is a good boy and he listens to people n follows dharma.
How can a good leader just be a listener. Shouldn’t be also carry his own opinions and influence people the right way to think and direct them towards growth?
Similar examples are there in many stories,
Like, Shakuntala Devi and her husband (how she was abandoned),
Later, in Jodha Akbar (idk the exact factual info, but through the movie n some references, how Jodha was questioned and she left home n then Akbar went back to get her when he realised),
So it’s always about a man committing a mistake in haste, or in the fear of society’s failure of judgement that a woman is questioned and punished! For a man to re-realise her worth n purity?
It’s probably the repeated pattern n mistake . May be it’s time to advocate the righteousness by actually giving a direction to the society on how to judge, how to not fear society’s judgement, how to not misguide women to bear the wrath of all the patriarchal forces for her to still prove her innocence!
It needs a severe change before propagating more on how it was righteous at all.
May be the take away could just be, “A man like rama has also committed a mistake, and one must learn to not repeat the same pattern. Atleast rise up and be more bold to face the world together rather than making harsh self made decisions in the name of righteousness!
Rama was spineless enough to not show the true dharma to
the public. Already Sita had done agnipariksha and the public still is questioning her chastity. The public will never learn and will gossip however much Rama do anything about it. Because that's how public are, they gossip and poke into things.
And to implore further, imagine Sita was raped and to take it more further, imagine she got pregnant from that. Can Rama be the real Puroshottama and show to the people that it was not her fault. Even if her 'purity' is gone, it's not her fault and we must take care of the weak and the victims and not push them off like garbage.
He could have showed a new and improved Dharma for his people. As Dharma keeps changing according to time and place, Dharma doesn't have to be a static entity.
Rama was a coward and a fool.
Coward for not doing the right thing. Fool for taking gossip among public seriously than teaching them about truth, critical thinking and empathy.
End of story.
@@slowdown7276 I agree. I wouldn’t like to ill speak or call names. But it’s just not righteous from all the stories we have been listening to.
This story always invokes the idea that only when a woman is put through misery from an external place, a man is willing to do whatever n sail oceans. But if it’s because of him? Is he willing to take the charge? That’s the only answer I’m waiting to know if this story has anything more to offer. If not, it’s not right.
your comments relieved me…yes why to get into that thinking of choosing between praja and wife. Why womens character is always in question. You being so powerful and enormous god couldnt save your wife from Ravan and later question her chastity. It hurts my heart..if a man like lord Ram couldn’t save Sita Ma ..then its better to be self reliant like Sita Ma who lived alone in Valmiki ashram and become self dependent..thats my take from Ramayan❤
जय श्री राम ♥️
This project will bring all lineage together
Namaskaram Sir for the entire content, the new playlist titled "Buddhi" and your vast knowledge of exact studies and research explained in most simple loud-n-clear manner. Such inputs are most required for many like us to understand our basics well hence thank you and best wishes for your future endeavors JaiSreeRam
What very few people do not understand is that Sita-Rama together are the Supreme Personality of Godhead. You can't separate the two. Can you separate the sun from the sunshine? Lord Rama is Shakti-man and Mother Sita is Shakti, you can never separate them from each other. From our distorted perspective, it may appear that Lord Rama has separated from Mother Sita, but in reality it is not possible. From our perspective it may seem that the sun is born from the sea, but in reality the sun is far away and untouched by the sea. Hare Krishna! 🙏
জয় শ্রী রাম।
जय श्री राम।
Jai Shree Ram.
జై శ్రీ రామ్
Respect Anna !! Love all the videos and the amount of research that goes into making each one of these...
Research? This is the same tired talking point that everyone else is saying.
Excellent work🙏🙏.
The last part where the shankh blows is goosebumps.
People of India need this.
🙏🏻🏵️🙏🏻 सीताराम 🙏🏼🏵️🙏🏼
Brave 👍
Jai shri ram🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
Bringing our historical and cultural heritages with easy to follow narratives including proper sloka references, Commendable Job, Hats off to you. Please continue with your great work
The morality of the story is that a Ruler should serve the interests and the demands of its people first, Just like a President or a PM. And this is why Rama has to turn back Sita to meet the disapproval and suspicions of his people.
The story revolves around Raj Dharma, If Rama as a King didn't banish Sita, he would have lost all respect and dignity in the society as a Ruler.
What is the Duty of a King to serve the interests and the demands of his people first, not to be self-centered and become a family man.
can you please make a entire series of ramayanam it would be a blessing comming from you
Sir, one clarification: when someone comments on the queen, is it not the king's duty to explain what has actually happened instead of going by what was commented. In general, kings needs to analyze the statement made by any person ( sita, in this context) and rama needs to explain it to the person who commented. If he punished sita by hearing some words by a random person, then it may prove that the person who commented is right. I am just thinking that the king could have gone as per dharma by proving/disproving the statement in the court before taking the decision.. please help me to understand this concept
valid point you have there
See, from what I understand, politically there are some rules that a ruler must follow for the dharma to function properly, it's not as simple as just proving his point and moving on. Rama is a king, not a commoner. For instance, if you look at this scenario from today's point of view, why do we think our government doesn't accept the women back who were forced to join ISIS, but have now realized and want to return. The women's parents still plead our government to bring them back. Why do you think our government doesn't consider their pleas? They are brain washed people, they may pose a threat to the country in the future. It's for the safety and security of the country. Similarly, maa Sita was in captivity with the enemy country as well. The women who were in captivity in Syria were common people. But, in Rama's scenario, Maa Seeta was going to become queen and rule the country, probably a major part of the earth, back then. How serious should a king be about this? After the abduction of Seeta, it's become a political thing now, no more a personal issue for Rama. She is his dear wife and he knows very well about her, but there's nothing personal for a ruler who puts his life before his country.
Another point in my understanding is, it's not good for the king to have emotional weaknesses any time in his life. It's very dangerous and there's 100% chance for the enemy countries to take advantage of this. So, it's very important for Rama to prove to his citizens that he has no personal weaknesses, and his country's well being is his foremost responsibility.
It's the personal sacrifice a king has done for his dharma as a ruler of a country. Rama is dharma personified, that's the greatness of our Rama.🙏
RAVAN kidnapped duplicate SITA MATA only as per TULSIDAS RAMAYANA
GODDESS SITA MATA is a reincarnation of MAHAKALI MATA
RAM RAJYA lasted for 11000 years as per BALMIKI RISHI….SITA MATA was never sent to forest again and was always with SHREE RAM….PRABHU RAM left with SITA MATA after 11000 years on their own decision…..
Further TULSIDAS has written in his UTTARKAND RAMAYANA, that MULTIVERSE exists… multiple different AYODHYAS in various earth like planets, but only one SHREE RAM
I think i might have a good enough explanation...at least something which satisfies me and makes sense. After the war, lord rama and maata sita were coronated king and queen. There was celebration all around in Ayodhya! And the epic of lord ram's battle against raavana spread like wildfire. And of course people, i assume, got to know about maata sita's agni-pravesha which was proof enough of her chastity and purity.
But you see my friend, we live in a society and so did the people at that time. Gossip is not something one can really fight against, it's a coward of an enemy, but unkillable all the same, immortal even. And people gossiped, in-spite of the truth. And the dhobi was just more vocal than your average citizen but even he ,I assume, would falter and curse himself for saying what he did if he actually met lord rama and maata sita in person. Lord rama heard about the way the public talked about his wife, the queen and questioned her chastity. How do you think he felt about it? for a man who had been through so much suffering, even going as far as to indirectly make maata sita, his love, his wife, his very life undergo an agni-pravesha just for the sake of his people so that they never doubt her, this must've been absolutely heart wrenching.
Rama failed. The scion of ikshvaku, the very incarnation of Mahavishnu, the preserver, was defeated.
Now, could he have given an explanation? absolutely so! punished the dhobi and whoever else for talking ill about the queen? i mean Rama would never have even thought about it but you know how cruel kings can be! But one must realize that the agni-pravesha was the absolute pinnacle of proof and nothing could top that.
So rama did the one thing only he could.
He sent maata sita away. And look at all the hate he gets even now for what he did. Does anyone ever question maata sita's chastity now in modern times? No. But do some people absolutely abhor lord ram? Yes , and so did i for a long time now! That is how great Lord rama is! Some might say he failed as a husband, but i think not. if anything he failed in love, he couldn't be with his beloved but he made sure that her honour was intact and he beared the brunt of misfortune. It has taken me literal years to understand our lord's actions. JAI SHRE RAM!
@@achyuthanand5006 Yes, Rama did not fail. Atleast for maa Sita, Rama is never a failure, and Rama knows that. But, inspite of sacrificing so much, the society still judges him. As far as his love for his wife is concerned, who are we as a society to judge. This society never understands. Rama after he orders Lakshman to leave her in the forest, also makes sure that she's left nearby Rishi Valmiki's ashram so she'd be taken care of. People don't recognize these gestures and still judge his love towards his wife. One can understand Rama only by reading Valmiki Ramayan.
Even I used to argue a lot with my mother when young. But now I understand that people need to have lot of maturity to understand both "Raja Ram" and "Sita Ram".
Sir, great job . Crystal clear explanation, very much needed now a days. Mee prayathnam ,, mee khushi vela kattalenidhi . Awareness is important 👏 thank u for Buddhi
This is not an explanation. This is just a talking point. No one can justify what Rama did because it is wrong.
Despite everything being explained well in the video, people are still asking stupid questions. Many times the circumstances are such where the difference between righteousness and unrighteousness becomes very less, in that situation Shri Ram took a decision which a common man can never take. If today's young generation is so stupid that they cannot understand this, then it is not the fault of Shri Ram. (The respect for Shri Ram has increased in my heart)
I don't know whether Ramayana is true or not, I maintain a neutral viewpoint between theists and atheists. But after reading Ramayana from beginning to end, there is no doubt left in my mind about the character of Lord Rama. I respect Shri Ram and will always do so.
Brilliant ❗ ❗ wata "killer" finishing line.. let's arm 'up' ourselves against the scavengers.. Jai Jai Shree Ram 🙏💪
Jai shree rama
మీ వీడియోలు అన్నిటిలో వుత్తర రామాయణం వీడియో చాలా విలువైనది నిడివి ఎక్కువ ఐనా ప్రతి విషయం అలాగే వివరించండి.❤❤
What an awesome voice you have. The shlokas come alive when spoken by you😊😊❤
Nuvvu “ Kaarana Janmudavu “ naayana. You were sent to this God’s green Earth for a reason and you are truly making an impact. There are no words to thank you for what you are doing and what you have done so far to bring the eternal knowledge of our Santana Dharma to the fore and educate millions of people. Kudos Shri Gurubhyo Namaha
It seems our Twitter loving Indian people existed even during Ramayana and they protested against Rama and Rama gave in .
A salute to your analysis of Ramayana. Rama was Dharmatma and he followed Raja dharma and abandoned Sita who was pregnant without even telling her. This act of Rama was not an injustice to Sita? If Rama loved Sita so much why didn't he sacrificed the throne and went with Sita???
Education teacher Telugu, hindi also it history to Store but people elders anchors it's another pension dimension. thank you❤
Instead of blaming us, human, who unknowingly accused Sita just because words from that washman and it's the real reason of why she's banished, we blame Rama, how irony...
And I said this as a 21 y.o. Thai girl who struggling on learning India culture but at least really into it. Plus I love Ramayana since I was a little child.
Thanks alot for the information. You're doing an amazing work.
Uttar kand (referred to here as Uttar Ramayan) is not part of original Valmiki Ramayan. It has been added later to satisfy the questions and curiosities of people. The style of the shlokas in Uttar Kand added in Valmiki is also very different to all other kands. It genuinely only appears in Tulsi Ramayan.
Thanks to this channel I had the motivation of reading a Critical Translation in English of the Valmiki Ramayana. I just finished the first two Kandas: Bala Kanda and Ayodhya Kanda. Going to the source has been an eye opener on Rama's personality, all the people around him and important events that happened in these two first parts. This topic about leaving Sita is quite contentious, because of the historic context when it happened. I'm looking forward to read everything myself to come to my own conclusions, based upon the values of Sanatana Dharma, my own knowledge and the ancienct wisdom of Bharat. Thanks for another great short docu.
Which book of ramayana you're reading bro...???
@@nalinakshitr5424 Namaste! I'm not a bro, I'm a sis 😂. I'm reading Valmiki Ramayana with the translation by Bibek Debroy from the Sanskrit Critical Edition.
This series ' Buddhi ' is something will be a game changer for your channel , it should be focused towards breaking myths and bringing the sanatanis of all castes together , Sadhuvaad to the punyaaatma within you
Jai shri Ram 🙏
Thank you for the playlist. The most needed in current times I would say. Lots of love to you.
Appreciate your sincere efforts
Good.
If Sita had to do Agni Pareeksha, Ram should have joined Sita as well. Just like when they were married, when they were tied together and circled Agnideva for their everlasting love. If people questioned Sita's character, did they not question Ram's character as well. Even he was without Sita for the same amount of time, his purity could also be questioned.
If we consider Ram ji as the ideal human, then how come he is falling in the trap of "Chaar log kya kahenge"?
Women have been suppressed so much for so long and even now we are not questioning our beliefs bases.
I have seen your other works. Thank you so much for educating the masses with our Dharma. Hopefully we all find our Paramaatman!
Rama's character is not questioned because he had already put in enormous effort in travelling across lands and in crossing the sea to find Sita and then putting his life in danger in a battle to rescue her. Do you think that a man who had a slept with another woman in his wife's absence would do that ? Is so, then you are not in reality. Secondly, it is not about an individual worrying about what "Chaar log kya kahenge". Rama was a king bearing responsibilities of the Kingdom on his shoulder and he wanted to fulfill that with the trust of the people of his kingdom that loved him dearly.
Namaskaram Project Shivoham, Sri Gurubhyo namaha, Wishwa Guru Bharatha matha ki Jayaho.
Simply great!iin kannada Hindi etcit was so exciting that the meaning of some of the sanskrit words are clearly known
Finally you made this video...great.. good explanation...Jai Sri Ram..🙏🚩
A really important subject you are discussing here. This is simply something outstanding. Please keep this effort up to make the PROGRESSIVE HINDUs (as they explain and think themselves uselessly) understand that they are far far far behind the real knowledge of SANATAN DHARMA.
Woman can be punished based on rumor for the crime of having their bodies violated. That is Sanathan Dharma.
@@82abhilashChal ja re rice bag
Bro please do a video on earth shape in hindu scriptures and planets described by Hindu scriptures.
Difference between the words.
1) bhugol- sphere
2) bhumandal- circular plane
3) bhulokh- plane of existence or dimension.
Each word is used in different places of our scriptures
So please do a video on earths shape in Hinduism.with scripture references
Please clarify this
Absolutely amazing bro 😍🔥🔥😍🔥🙏
Great bro chala Manchiga explain chesthunav 👏👏
Jai shree Ram
Keep the channel in English, so it could reach global audience, Jai Shree Ram ❤
God Bless🙏
Ramchandra never left Sita according to Valmikis Ramayana
There is also the curse of Bhrigu. Bhrigu had cursed Lakshmi Narayana with Seperation. Lord Vishnu respects the curse.
Thank you very much
Thank you🙏
Raam never leaved ma sita.
All ramayna written before 11th ce doesnt have last kand its complated after raam return to ayodhya. Oldest ramayna found is belonge to 6th ce which doesnt have last kand and also all expart axcept that baal kand and uttar kand were add after and not the part of original valmiki ramayna. If u buy valmiki ramayna today and open first page 3 page its written that all expert says that baal kand and uttar kand were not the part of original ramayna and the give many example for that. Writting were completly drifrent and cant be written by sage valmiki. Many example given in first 3 pages of valmiki ramayna even today eara any body can read it.
Lord Rama knew fully well Sita Devi was virtuous. He cared more about his image with rumor mongers than his duty to his wife and his wedding wows. Nevertheless, Rama is beloved for his far greater virtues.
Namaskaram ji thank you. Jai shree Ram
See the movie young Victoria. In the movie while going in horse carriage with husband people comment that he husband is waste. Hearing that she goes back to palace and gives him portfolio to upkeep museums. So this happens even in modern times. I understood site being left behind only after seeing that movie.
Excellent, superb, hatsoff to u sirji, god bless u
Very good review of a highly noble personality. Thank you so much for the share.
Very nice work sir jay shree ram ❤
Sri ram never left mata sita
I don't think uttar kanda was originally part of Valmiki Ramayana. It was added later even Gita press publication mentions this as disputed among scholars . Which means Valmiki Ramayana ends with Lanka kand .
Yes, all ramayna corbon dated before 11th ce doesnt have uttar kand. Oldest one belonge to 6th ce. Utar kand found in 13th ce ramayna not before that.
uttar kanda was certainly added later. But does that make it fiction?
First of all, Shri Ram never left her in Forests as many people claim, his order was clear that she should be sent at the hermitage of Valmiki ji, and as per Anand Ramayan he discussed with Sita's parents to live with her in and take care of her, he clearly ordered to make all the arrangements for her so that she doesn't have to face any discomfort, yet he took all the blame on himself. This is how loving husband Shri Ram is❤
Thanks for your videos sir 🙏🙏🙏 Please do a very detailed video on Sundarakanda. . I want to listen on a regular basis and want to apply in my daily life both in personal and professional contexts. Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏🙏
Few people say that Maa Sita was under the protection of Agni dev and Ravana had kidnapped Maya Sita.
How far is this true? If yes, what is the supporting text?
Yes it’s true…please check TULSIDAS RAMAYANA….also called SHRI RAM CHARITAR MANAS
@@rajeshkumar98769 but Valmiki Ramayan is more authentic and don't think there is a mention.
Also if you read about Vedavati, she had cursed Ravana that a woman will be reason of his downfall. And it is said she took rebirth as Mata Sita
anna can you please make a video on 16000 wives of sri krishna. And these days people are taunting us on 1000 apsaras thing....please do enlighten us
1000 apsaras already debunked, false translations spread by others... very soon 16000 will be debunked ..
the easiest way one could understand the thing is...
a female cant be accepted if she's been with another guy... back then..
those 1600 girls were kidnapped n forcefully married to a demon..
when krishna killed the demon.. n freed those women.. society wasnt ready to accept them...
so krishna accepted them as his part of life ( not exactly wives) but to live n spend lives together woih him..
its not 16k its 1600..
Yes but shri krishna accepted them because no one would accept them.
Thank you sooooo much for addressing this in your video's; I have been asking this question to family for years, right. I cannot believe that you could/would watch your spouse, whom you are devoted to burn to death in front of your very eyes. Regardless of Dharma, it is hard to comprehend, they had satvic powers through years of meditation etc., so, I believe, that Lord Rama would have known deep down within, that Ma Sita was completely innocent and utterly devoted to him. Makes me cry just thinking about it, so sad, truly. I will definitely be subscribing to your other channel. Namaste from the UK & JSR!
The simplest answer is...
It's a canon event it will happen in every kalchakra and every ramayan in every universe. It is just meant to be. That's it
Jai sitaram
Both are one
Like lord shiva Parvathi
Sri Rama loves Sita matha more than anyone
Today everyone are pointing on the great Lord Ram
No one can be lordram
We all believe Sita mata as great godess
Great women
Though Lord ram is great today some people are pointing Lord Ram decisions
He is one ,he is great
He killed Ravana and brought sitha matha back
No king would do this thing
When Ravana kidnaped Sita mata Lord ram cried a lot
If Lordram is a judgemental person towards Sita mata
Then he don't cry and search for Sita mata
Then only he leaves Sita mata
But no Lord ram is great he killed Ravana and protected his wife
According to valamiki ramayana
LORD RAM IS GREAT HUMAN AND GREAT KING
We all should know our hindu stories too
Purananas too each and every purana
Dasavataram
Mathya avatar
Karma avatar
Varahaa avatar
Narshimha avatar
Parasurama avatar
Vamana avatar
Sri Rama chandra avatar
Sri krishna avatar
Buddha avatar
Kalki avatar
If you study Dasavataram stories
Then you can understand the greatness of lordram and his decisions towards Sita mata
Lord Ram is Lord Vishnu avatar
Godess sita is Godess lakshmi
God is great
Lakshminarayana
Sitaram
As a king he took that decision to send Sita mata to forest
But as a husband he cried more more more for Sita mata
He love Sita mata
Sita mata loves Ram
They both are one
Even while performing yagna
He brought a golden statue of Sita mata
That is greatness of lordram
Just some people are pointing on lordram
Without knowing the truth
The God Love
The god play
The god ideas
There is a big reason behind it
Some people see Lord ram as human and a great king
Some people see Lord ram as god
He is absolutely god
The great lordram
By watching some movies or some serials
People started to judge even Lordram
How foolish is it
He is our Lordram
One and only one
Whatever lordram does
Is absolutely right
If he didn't take agniparishka decisions and sending sita mata to forest even still today also
People Jude Sita mata purity
At Ramayana time there is no TV or internet to understand and show the agniparishka to each and every citizen
Even Lord ram didn't take the decisions towards Sita mata
Even today also we all judge sita mata character
But without any doubt
We all praise Sita mata as maha pathivratha
We all feel sad about her
Because she suffered a lot
We all judge Lordram for his decisions
But we never judge Sita mata
So please try to understand
There is one and only one great king
Great human
Great Husband
Great god
Lord Ram
Sri Rama chandra prabhu
Jai ho Sri Rama chandra Prabhu ki
Jai
Jai Jai sitaram
I still strongly object to Rama's decision. The main question is not whether he loved Sita but if he was indeed a righteous king at all in this context. He knew very well that Sita was chaste, but his subjects were suspicious of her character. So, as a wise king, he should have called a public meeting and have it declared explicitly that Sita was chaste (repeating this exercise if needed), thus putting an end to the rumors. He should have also made it clear that even if Sita did sit on Ravana's thighs (or did anything that questioned her character), that would have been under coercion and thus would not qualify as a situation for judging her character. If he had pressed that conviction, he would have set a very good example of a king working as a social reformer. But alas, he "feared" speaking to his extremely loyal subjects and undertook this very anti-heroic action of exiling his wife (and eventually regretting it).
@minni5503 that is what Dharma means, apparently.
Dharma = injustice 😂
@@smarathe301 yes. And it is no laughing matter.
Can you explain this to todays public by talking... Suppose you are at a very high position and your wife goes through same allegations...then??? Do you think you will explain people that she is chaste and more to it will they believe?? Do you really think so ??
I don't think so...
Yes it was a very harsh descision but he had no option...
@@hedwig6643 My wife's charcater is no one else's business. Only mine. Mine alone. What any one else has to say does not matter. Jashodaben may or maynot be a whore, Narendra Modi is judged only for his performance.
Can this content be obtained in Hindi?
Thank you. Your efforts to provide us with a straightforward meaning of this event in Ramayanam is much appreciated. Hoping people will understand the meaning of "righteousness".
Righteousness means listening to people lie about your wife and then punishing your wife for their lies.
THANK YOU...SIR... AGAIN...!!!
I, the continuous learning student, wrote a comment about that important Question for your previous lecture.
But in summary :
It was the duty of the SHRI RAMAN TO FULLFILL THE DHARMAM... AND
MA- SITA WAS HIS OTHER PART...TO BE THE TOOL TO HELP HIM TO DO THAT...!!!
Therefore both are in it... and they are ONE... Completing eachother...!!!
THANKS AGAIN...!!!
VERY VERY VERY NICE AND THANKS FOR BRIEF OF RAMAYAN
I think we need to change the perpective of seing thing..anything that written by our ancestors does not only have one meaning..it have internal meaning
The whole ramayan was about human soul reaching back to the eternal god
1.rama-the god
2.sita-human soul
3.laksmana-awareness
4.ravanan - ego
5.14 years of exile-symbolism of when a soul and body is togather--human,the life is full of problems
6.the golden dear-maya
7.agni pravesham-when u soul(sita) is capture by ego(ravana), the soul need to get rid of the impurities and god only accept our pure soul back,agni is said to be pure in ancient
The whole story of ramanyan is telling u when a soul takes a human body,it will go through hurdles ( suffering),when a human get attracted by maya(gold deer),there is where god goes out(rama went out)and ego(ravana) start to creep in..yet our awareness( lakshmana protection) will try to protect us,but still the soul will be attracted by maya...in order to let go ego and maya, a person need to undergo a big process(war) and strong faith in god(how sita have faith in rama,only think of rama)..still after the war, u soul will be testify for purity ( agni praksha)
Hope this doesnt hurt anyone and just a small sharing and look at our ancestor view different...
Copying Sri Rama Chakradhar babu?
@@slowdown7276 who is Sri Rama Chakradhar Babu?
People ever will think, the same, some so and some so, as Sita was pure, she must stay with Rama ❤❤
What do you mean by "pure". Are you talking about purity in body or mind? Sita was not raped. Sita was pure in body and mind, still Rama abandoned her because she was suspected of having an impure body, not an impure mind. Is that enough reason to abandon your wife. Let us assume that she has an impure body. Is the impurity because of rape of adultery. If it was adultery, then she had both impure body and mind. But the purity of her mind was never in question. So it was always about her body. Let us assume that she was actually raped. She will have an impure body but a pure mind. Enough reason to abandon?
It just pains me to know My Shri Ram had to suffer like that because of the society. And Mata Sita I don't how she felt about this whole blame game by stupid people. I have never read or Heard anything about her opinion. Still they both suffered.🤧😭💔
Shree ram left sita for dharma
But what is dharma??
for Sri Ram his dharma was to become a true and rightful king.... kingdom is before self
@@captainvenom7252 won't taking action against the petty remarks that may arise be more rightful
Afterall ma sita was both his wife and his subject
@@sneed1764 dharma isn't a set of rules...
It varies from person to person...
Yet the karma of a being decides the future...
As a king, ram choose dharma.. even knowing that his karma gonna cost him everything.. but yet for the sake of Kingdom n societies he choosed what was the most right thing that time..
@@sneed1764 n see the most profound impact of ramayan on societies n civilization of bharat is that...
If one couple marries they tend to live eachother for rest of their lives....
Yes it seems opposite to the karma of sri ram but not the values addressed by Sri ramayan
Sir the reason of shri ram leaving sita while she was pregnant is mentioned in
Padam puran, Patalkhand, adhyay 125,
Page no: 518,519,520 (geeta press gorakhpur)
Here it is told that mata sita was cursed by a parrot the she will have to bear the pain of separation from her husband during her pregnancy as she was forcefully trying to keep that parrot in same situation.