Why did Ram send Seeta Away? Jay Lakhani| Hindu Academy|
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 жов 2024
- Visit: www.hindu-acade... for more information. Join our Whatsapp Broadcast Group by sending a Whatsapp message to: +447717884792 or click this link: jo.my/hinduacademy
Hindu Academy aims to promote a Comprehensive and Rational vision of Hinduism incorporating ideas of Religious Pluralism, Spiritual Humanism, and resonance between Science and Spirituality. It operates with the education establishments by working with schools colleges and universities as well as in the mainstream media.
The role and relevance of Hinduism in contemporary society
Hinduism has a great deal to contribute towards the spiritual health of the modern world. Its inherent pluralistic teachings offer the best resolution to how people of different religions can co-exist peacefully in a multi-faith society. Hinduism even allows for spirituality to be explored in non-religious modes, making teachings relevant and interesting for the youth of today. Family values promoted by Hinduism can foster more stable family units and better community cohesion. The reconciliation between the truth claims of a science-oriented worldview and a religiously oriented worldview is obligatory in this century. The Hindu Academy invokes findings at the cutting edge of modern sciences to promote this reconciliation.
Please Like and Share our videos and subscribe to our UA-cam Channel: / hinduacademy
You can also join the conversation on our social media channels:
Facebook: / hinduacademy
Linkedin: / jay-lakhani-spiritual-...
Twitter: / hinduacademy
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Please watch: "Advaita"
• ADVAITA | Jay Lakhani ...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
#hinduism #jaylakhani #hinduacademy
#JayLakhani #HinduismExplained #HinduAcademy
Thank you Lakhani hi for this enlightenment. Was wondering all my life, why did Ram send Sita away and why Sita maa had to endure the pain even after agni pariksha.
Please share this video with others on facebook and whatsapp to raise Hinduism awareness.
Just to satisfy other you can't leave your loved ones. Doesn't make sense. And not a normal person but The perfect man
he was a king....even if he stood by sita ma the people would have left dissatisfied...he sacrificed sita ma for the state and people of kosala
When you are a king you have to do this but you won't get it and that's why you ain't at a higher position as well.
@@koraiemon do you think you are at high position? What are the criteria for being at high level? And are you sure you know everything?
I completely agree with you, and this crap that he was a king hence he did it, there have been thousands of kings came and lived in the world and then didn't abandon their wives , husband has different responsibilities and king has different responsibilities each to be fulfilled
@@atharalimaan8509 it was the reason why today you are cursing him , is the reason he made sita mata leave , ramaayana is a history , not a story , he further tells in ramayana that in future everybody will always blame me but no one will question sita's purity , and that is what today's happening, we curse lord rama for his deed and nobody of us doubts about sita mata's purity. Thats why he was RAM
What if this twist in the story is actually meant to inspire our own sense of morality?
Ram is revered as the one who is most ethical. But at the end his choice is something we cannot morally agree with.
Perhaps this leads us to think about morality for ourselves, and not blindly follow the footsteps of others, even teachings from God.
It also shows that the standard of morals change with the passage of time. So what was right before may not be right today.
I think the twist adds to the story - if Ram was perfect the whole time it may grow dull. But the ending allows us to ponder and debate what is truly moral? And thus the story is passed on, and the quest for true morality continues.
Ram loved seeta like no one.. if not, why would he go all the way to srilanka and fight with ravan he could have left her that time itself and married some other women..and ram din say Sita to give agnipariksha for him self he is king he has to take care of people more then his own family that's what kings dhàrma is...otherwise he would have become ordinary..seeta never complained about it because she must knew about her husband very well that's the reason she stood with him for all his work..😊 till today see we all call seeta ram😊😊
Because his male pride was being decimated by the abduction.
Kya fayeda usse...lord krishna is a lot bigger person than ram..I would rather idolize lord krishna than som e mere mortal
A great injustice was done with Sita mata.She is ours National God.She must be worshiped in the whole World.
This is what the God Rama wanted. He completely achieved his mission as a Great Husband and as a great Lover. God Rama has completely wiped out the blames on Sita Devi , instead, he created a sympathy on her by making Sita do Agni Pariksha and by sending her to the Valmiki ashram in the forest that he took all the blames on him which is actually happening right now that we are all pointing our fingers on Rama even after all these years as Ramayana was happened some lakhs of years ago, we're still blaming Rama but not Sita. Ram's mission achieved. Can't hold my tears anymore.
Jai shree ram❤️🙏
surely it's more 'damaging to the fabric of society' to have marriages of bondage, where there is no equality, respect or freedom for the female partner. surely patriarchy and 'toxic masculinity' is what is most 'damaging to the fabric of society'! I hate it when men rationalize and defend a misogynist story, dismissing the very valid feelings of upset that women feel when hearing this deeply troubling tale.
It was a questionable decision for sure. But, come on, u can't just call it a misogynist tale.
Also, it was a very difficult decision for Lord Ram himself. The most difficult decision of his life. He himself never doubted her for a second. But a good king must respect public opinion.
Now was it fair for Maa Sita? Absolutely not.
But the end result of it all , was that from that point on no person has ever doubted Maa Sita's purity. The same public which was doubting Maa Sita was left regretful and ashamed when she was consumed by mother earth.
Not everything in Ramayan is an example of ideal behaviour. Somethings are lessons for what not to do in future.
Hello sir, please make a reasonable comparison, sita matha has not gone to other man but was kidnapped by other man(Ravana), so here keeping sita matha as queen doesn't change the moral into a woman can start living men nor thier change partners...
Both the situations are different...
He is talking about society he is not comparing he is telling the society thinking at that time
@@dishabelwal393 well he is justifying leaving mata Sita because she was abducted by another man against her will. And this similar mindset of society gives men the right to treat women beneath them, so lord Ram should have stood for the rights of women.
@@shikshasharma6121 lord Rama never doubted mata sita as a husband .But as a king it was his duty that he is accountable to the people . Mata Sita was also the queen .Both of them have the responsibilities on their shoulder to answer the society . Lord Rama was protecting mata sita character by proving her purity he never questioned her chastity .
@@madhumitachatterjee9439 hello boomer king life and his actions are example to people. He teach wrong example to people. he is worst husband and worst king
Wokes will be very unhappy with your explanation Sir 😂😂🙏🚩🚩Jai Shri Ram
Log kya sochenge yeh chakkar mai ne apni wife ko ghar seh nikal diya ...yahi hai na bhai😂
Koi sense hai iss baat ki ? I told my wife, whose livelihood entirely depends on me, to leave my house and live on her own just becuz someone said that she is not pure...idolize Krishna❤ who married 10000 woman captured by a rakshash not some fake myth character
Why listening to others? He could have sermoned others like Buddha and make them enlightened. This is not fair at all. Was he for the society , he should never have married sita. I never respect his decision
He was a king, the responsibly of the nation is what a king considers most important. Sita was a Queen, the same responsibility lies on her.
@@rushi6130 he should’ve stood by her no matter what world thinks. Sita Maa was pure and If Ram ji knew she is pure then he shouldn’t have let her suffer. Agar woh Sita Maa ko suffer nahi hone dete aur unka saath dete bhale he uske baad log unko king nahi mante lekin fir bhi woh Sita Maa ka saath dete toh bohat acha message jata aaj kal ke logo ke liye. It would have raised the moral values of today’s people.
@@GauravMehta6 ram was king of people even if he stood by Mata the people would not have been satisfied....ram sacrifice sita ma for the state of kosala and its people... people's king
@@prakharaditya8493 Well what greater good can come from sacrificing an innocent pregnant woman? And his queen is the first amongst his subjects who deserved justice and it was the responsibility of the man for whom she had left everything to stand besides her when she needed him. And how does punishing a sinless person bring stability in society? What lord Ram did was a crime against all women. Even after having 0 fault in what happened to her, she suffered. As a result even today if a woman is harassed by men, she is the one who is blamed.
Buddha? The one who left his son and wife sleeping just get his answers?
Why was indian society so wierd at that time?
Is it better now? 🤔
Much better
thats why sati came into practice.Thanks to Rajaram mohan roy
.
Sati is personal choice not mandatory
KALI SHE WHO HAS SANSKRIT NAMES LOTUS LAKSMI- SATI- SITA-DURGA- PARVATI-GAURI- RADHA. SHE IS AMAVASYA (SHE WHO IS NEW MOON). SHE IS ALLAH! AND NOW SHE WILL STAND ON THE DEAD BODY OF HER HUSBAND AND DESTROY EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE! SHIVA! SELFSAME KRSNA RAMA! SO THERE ! LA ILA HA ILA LA HU!