Deadly Mistake #6: Getting a BAD PATENT from a patent attorney
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 сер 2024
- To get the whole 7 Deadly Mistakes That Inventors Make™ video series, go to TheInventorsJourney.com/deadly...
The 7 Deadly Mistakes That Inventors Make™ is a free video series that stops you from making the mistakes that inventors have been making for decades. It is also a preparatory tool for The Inventor's Journey™. Here are the list of The 7 Deadly Mistakes:
Deadly Mistake #1: Using an Invention Development or Promotion Company: TheInventorsJourney.com/deadly...
Deadly Mistake #2: Getting a Bad Patent Search: TheInventorsJourney.com/deadly...
Deadly Mistake #3: Trying to License your invention Too Early: TheInventorsJourney.com/deadly...
Deadly Mistake #4: Ordering Units Too Early: TheInventorsJourney.com/deadly...
Deadly Mistake #5: Paying for Expensive Services before getting a proof of Principle: TheInventorsJourney.com/deadly...
Deadly Mistake #6: Getting a BAD PATENT from a patent attorney: TheInventorsJourney.com/deadly...
Deadly Mistake #7: Not MASTERING THE ART of invention: TheInventorsJourney.com/deadly...
You can get The Inventor's Journey™ Starter Pack at:
TheInventorsJourney.com
Go On Your Journey™!
I have been looking for someone that make sense since the late 80's and all I seem to have found was crooks. I have watched many ideas I have eventually come to past because I didn't see much reason to trust. You have said many things that brings me to want to work with you. I have some ideas I'm putting together and when I get to a certain point I will be reaching out. Keep up rhgood work.
looks like i'll being reaching to them also
teop Did you use/work with SD Inventors? How are they?
shit man!
wish i knew all this b4....
I am going to see my patent lawyer today, i will video blog it....
im bricking it!!!
been working on my invention for 4 years and finally got it right!
I don’t know UK patent law but in the USA if you are positive you will be filing for a patent in other countries the following won’t work long term, unless there is another loophole, but if not you can prevent your patent from being published until it is granted, if it is granted, simply by requesting to the USPTO it not be published before being granted and in the mean time nobody you talk to about licensing it knows what exactly you patented unless you tell them. Just show them your prototype and say the patent is pending and if they demand to see your patent application tell them drop dead and leave. Then they will have to risk that they will design around an unknown, hard to do, and risk infringement and loss of their investment in trying to design around it, or pay up. If you later decide to file a patent in another country too you have 45 days after you file there to tell the USPTO you filed and then they will publish your patent soon if the 18 months from your priority date has passed. I’ll bet it is considered malpractice for an attorney filing in the USA not to request the patent not be published initially upon filing regardless of intentions to later file in other countries.
Mark Pope I bet having a prototype gets the prospective investor/licensee’s interest up, but how far would you get if you didn’t show/have proof of an actual patent pending or granted?
Wouldn’t they just flag you off?
I’m very new to this/curious
Why would anybody wait till their patent is granted to try to get someone to license it? It takes years to get a patent granted and you can file your provisional patent up to a year before filing for your patent. How is the company you market it to going to see your patent before it is published so how are they going to be able to determine they can design around something they can’t even read yet? If the brush up guy didn’t know that you are supposed to write claims for multiple embodiments of your invention then he did not do his homework before deciding what attorney to hire. I talked to a patent attorney that a friend had paid and recommended and told him I had spent 100-200 hours studying patents and despite telling him this I still knew over 90% of what he told me in a 1 hour free phone conversation in which he was trying to make a good impression.
Cleaning “element” vs cleaning “apparatus” is a big mistake not a “typo” and should have been a red flag that if this was actually written by a patent attorney that they are incompetent. Using different wording in different parts of a patent for the same thing is widely known that it can result in a granted patent being successfully challenged for failing to clearly teach how to make the invention
Jethro i cant get to your web site via this link or Shine link
Hi. Please try this one for now:
theinventorsjourney.com/7deadlymistakes.html
With regards,
Jethro L Bennett
Captain of SHIINE® ENTERPRISE
Creator of The Inventor's Journey™ ( www.TheInventorsJourney.com )
Inventor, Professional Product Designer, Elite Patent Specialis
Can't find #7 :(
Regardless of who you pay you need to stop being lazy and educate yourself to the fullest extent possible so you can tell if the the person you hire is competent. If you don’t you better hope you are lucky. How can you understand what you invented or explain it to someone else like a lawyer or patent illustrator if you don’t know anything about patent law? If you had to hire a lawyer that only speaks French if would be cheaper if you learn some French before talking with them. If you don’t you will spend a lot of money having the lawyer teach you what you could learn in a book or in a YT video. The University of Pennsylvania at Philadelphia law school has all 26 of their lectures on patent law on UA-cam. Read a good NOLO Patent book first, watch those videos and others and read some patents and their claims and then hire someone.
Hulk lazy. Hulk BAAAAAAAASH!!!!!!!