1885 Dimancea: A Revolver With Sprockets

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 сер 2019
  • / forgottenweapons
    Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! shop.bbtv.com/collections/forg...
    Patented in 1885 by Romanian military officer Haralamb Dimancea, this revolver is actually a true hammerless design. Instead of simply shrouding a hammer inside the frame, Dimancea used a pair of rotating sprockets to cock and release a striker and act as hand and stop for the cylinder. The Gatling Arms Company of Birmingham England produced a run of 1,000 of the guns, which were used in Romanian military trials, and also tested by the French as a replacement for their 1873 revolver. Neither country ended up adopting the gun, though.
    A .45 caliber 5-shot version was apparently made in small numbers, but the standard pattern (like this example) is a .38 caliber, 6-shot model. The barrel, crane, and cylinder pivot 90 degrees to the left to extract empty cases and reload. While Dimancea's design was innovative, is really did not provide any benefit over a traditional revolver, and is considerably more complex to manufacture. It fires in double action only, with no mechanical way to manually cock the action for a "single action" shot.
    Contact:
    Forgotten Weapons
    PO Box 87647
    Tucson, AZ 85754

КОМЕНТАРІ • 836

  • @The666knives
    @The666knives 5 років тому +588

    I'm romanian and I have never heard of this revilver. Haven't seen it in the National Military Museum either. Thank you for the video!

    • @growndown3358
      @growndown3358 Рік тому +35

      I wonder if it's because not many might be left of if the communist and present authorities weren't / aren't that keen on letting the public know that gun ownership and design used to be a thing in Romania.

    • @cs-rj8ru
      @cs-rj8ru Рік тому +27

      Well, 99.9% of Romanians have never heard of a firearm beyond a Kalashnikov...You're just not "gun" people. What's your firearm ownership rate there? 2.5%?

    • @growndown3358
      @growndown3358 Рік тому

      @@cs-rj8ru Even less. It's 0,7% / 100 people, and of those around half are non-lethal guns. The communists did a "good job" of turning Romanians into gun fearing people.

    • @Mad_Cris41
      @Mad_Cris41 Рік тому +23

      Yes something between 2.5 and 3.0%. But regular people can only own lethal hunting weapons which can only be used for hunting and non lethal self defence weapons which can only be used for self defence. If you are a collector the weapons must be rendered unable to fire.

    • @bombardier6033
      @bombardier6033 Рік тому +46

      @@cs-rj8ru hey, that's not true! we know all of the guns from CS 1.6

  • @oniboi9629
    @oniboi9629 5 років тому +770

    Looks like the revolver i use to draw back when i was a kid

    • @Cacowninja
      @Cacowninja 5 років тому +35

      I guess you were an accurate artist then since this revolver actually exists.

    • @robosoldier11
      @robosoldier11 5 років тому +8

      Quite blocky to be sure.

    • @stevematson4808
      @stevematson4808 5 років тому +6

      A kid designed it

    • @JoeDutchman
      @JoeDutchman 4 роки тому +6

      Han Solo shot first

    • @tarstakars
      @tarstakars 3 роки тому

      I think "Fearless Fosdick" carried one of those...

  • @emeralddragongaming2930
    @emeralddragongaming2930 4 роки тому +98

    The inventor of this gun was a genius I would say. To think all this working complexity is really something.

    • @alecustoica
      @alecustoica 4 роки тому +33

      19th Century Romanian bourgeoisie, the ones that were actually competent, had a lot of time on their hands. Couple that with speaking English, French and/or German just for the sake of going to studies abroad, they really had a lot of wacky ideas.

    • @kevinedwards7079
      @kevinedwards7079 4 місяці тому

      Now that's not true how to define genius is an attempt by a fool to measure his own knowledge

  • @SpacePatrollerLaser
    @SpacePatrollerLaser 5 років тому +504

    I told them "Use Cogswell's cogs: Not Spaceley's sprockets"

    • @hanskc3302
      @hanskc3302 5 років тому +4

      Sounds like the line from The Men That Will Not Be Blamed For Nothing song.

    • @baker90338
      @baker90338 5 років тому

      Cl Lyman why not Garret’s Gubbins?

    • @Tobascodagama
      @Tobascodagama 5 років тому +26

      @@baker90338 Because Garret's Gubbins wasn't in The Jetsons. :)

    • @FishHeadly1
      @FishHeadly1 5 років тому +8

      CI Lyman is using the way-back machine to find that special episode of The Jetsons.

    • @iwishyouhappinnes1125
      @iwishyouhappinnes1125 5 років тому +3

      Hans KC it is from the jetsons, if you did not know.

  • @thedevilinthecircuit1414
    @thedevilinthecircuit1414 3 роки тому +74

    Designed by a clockmaker. The sear and stop operate exactly like the pawl and wheel on a clock's escapement.

  • @kenwheeler3637
    @kenwheeler3637 5 років тому +170

    The late 1800's was such a hotbed for interesting and innovative firearms design tech.

    • @hamm6035
      @hamm6035 5 років тому +11

      I was bitten by the change from muzzle loading to self contained cartridge. Over a lot of years I obtained a 1876 Peabody Martini from the Providence Tool co. in .43 Spanish, a 1888 45/70 Trapdoor Springfield, last was a .577 1875/80 British Snider. 2 of these you have to reform cases to shoot them. The rest of my collection for the Era are modern reproductions. I'm writing all this to inspire you and others for this era. It is fascinating and "shootable" originals are affordable. A lot of safe queens and wall hangers are coming on the market. It is the most interesting time. I'll stop. ;)

    • @oneproudbrowncoat
      @oneproudbrowncoat 5 років тому +1

      Punctuated equilibrium.

    • @oneproudbrowncoat
      @oneproudbrowncoat 5 років тому

      @@patrickglaser1560 we've gone as far as we can *with existing materials*. The next advance will involve propellant material or projectile composition.

    • @oneproudbrowncoat
      @oneproudbrowncoat 5 років тому

      @@patrickglaser1560 I'm not arguing against the point that we're close to the limit. As I see it, the material science is the problem. We both know that the means of energy transfer (kinetic, electromagnetic, or other) will each have advantages and disadvantages.

    • @GrannyBender
      @GrannyBender Рік тому

      It seems that in a lot of fields the late 1800s were a wild time for everything involving engineering.
      I collect and document cameras and around the same period, you've got a wild explosion in terms of cameras.
      It's when we went from "wet" glass plates (aka, the plates had to be coated with the photo sensitive chemicals right before taking your shot) to dry plates (aka, you can easily store or buy pre coated plates).
      And so, we went from big studio cameras to more compact smaller cameras you could more easily pack with you; so, a wild explosion of manufacturers and unusual designs.
      It was a wild time for makers and engineers!

  • @zupperm
    @zupperm 5 років тому +89

    -That’s a nice revolver.
    -Thanks! It has sprockets.

  • @Aushul
    @Aushul Рік тому +142

    I think the man that invented this revolver was a genius. To think at all this parts, with al this parts of the parts... He had no computer, the concept was in his mind only until he put it on the paper.
    Quite genius!

    • @catalintimofti1117
      @catalintimofti1117 Рік тому +11

      Its hard with a computer as well you need to know what you want

    • @ginkamikaze2
      @ginkamikaze2 Рік тому +2

      @@catalintimofti1117 I think he meant you had no way of visualizing the mechanism apart from drawing it yourself on paper, which if you suck at drawing, it can be quite the task :))

    • @catalintimofti1117
      @catalintimofti1117 Рік тому +1

      @@ginkamikaze2 i mean yeah speed up things but its still hard as shit

    • @c.s.4273
      @c.s.4273 Рік тому

      Simplicity is geniunity. This is just mindfuck. For a good reason this revolver was no success at all.

    • @Aushul
      @Aushul Рік тому

      @@c.s.4273 Said this to your phone. Is anything but simple.

  • @SkyWriter25
    @SkyWriter25 3 роки тому +8

    Legend has it that the fellow assigned to clean the gun after the Romanian military trials is still trying to reassemble it to this day.

  • @mokeimusic
    @mokeimusic 3 роки тому +41

    The machining that went into making that gun is intense.

  • @AustinScottHoffman
    @AustinScottHoffman 4 роки тому +212

    Despite it's complicated design it really is an innovation for its time. It's basically a semi-automatic revolver. It's a shame that it wasn't accepted. If only a simpler version was made. It really is an engineering marvel

    • @bca-biciclindcuaxel7527
      @bca-biciclindcuaxel7527 Рік тому +7

      In 1885 Romania was a German Kingdom with a German King. Ofcourse everything was over complicated and over engineered :))

    • @craigiefconcert6493
      @craigiefconcert6493 Рік тому +2

      Semi-automatic revolver? Pretty much every revolver since the percussion cap era is semi-automatic

    • @bca-biciclindcuaxel7527
      @bca-biciclindcuaxel7527 Рік тому +2

      @@ChillYeti 1885 Kingdom of Romania. King was Carol I de Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen and around one million germans were living in Romania. You have free acces at internet, is no reason to be ignorant ..

    • @bca-biciclindcuaxel7527
      @bca-biciclindcuaxel7527 Рік тому

      @@ChillYeti Just because Romania was CREATED and was ruled by a German King, our schools were in German, we had catolic churches and a huge german population and also german was our lingua franca like English is today...ofcourse Romania was not a ''german kingdom '' :))) Romania became independent and a real country ONLY because our German King dedicated his life to warfare, Carol was personally in the battlefied and he WON the war !

    • @bca-biciclindcuaxel7527
      @bca-biciclindcuaxel7527 Рік тому

      @@ChillYeti Romania BECAME and independent European Country because CAROL 1st ( Romania's German King, that was an excelent strategist ) won the WAR OF INDEPENDENCE against Ottoman Empire 1878. I am not even good at history and I know when ROmania was created and how it was created !

  • @donweatherwax9318
    @donweatherwax9318 2 роки тому +41

    Here's Ian in a French gallery, showing us a revolver, designed by a Romanian, patented in the UK, and also manufactured there (for an American machine-gun company) . . . and packed full of Swiss complexity. How cosmopolitan can you get?

  • @CrescentGuard
    @CrescentGuard 5 років тому +53

    The whole time he was explaining how it worked I had a look of confusion on my face like I'd just walked in on a group of monkeys playing Twister while discussing quantum mechanics.

  • @totoianugheorghelucian488
    @totoianugheorghelucian488 3 роки тому +13

    I'm romanian and i never knew about this gun until now, thank you for the video!!

  • @spazmonkey2131
    @spazmonkey2131 5 років тому +147

    There's a waterwheel in your revolver

  • @brumby92
    @brumby92 5 років тому +28

    Its gorgeous. Thats a huge amount of machining, especially the one piece barrel/ front.

  • @HappisakVideos
    @HappisakVideos 5 років тому +110

    Another Star wars blaster, a scope and some odd metal widgets on it it would be perfect. :D

  • @mitchhill9450
    @mitchhill9450 5 років тому +197

    An engineering dream a soliders stripping nightmare..

    • @aserta
      @aserta 5 років тому +12

      It's sealed. You wouldn't have to take it apart. It's a trade off i'd accept.

    • @paulwolf2775
      @paulwolf2775 5 років тому +12

      Definitely not "soldier proof".

    • @NPFeifman
      @NPFeifman 5 років тому +10

      As a mechanical engineer, I concur. Really interesting. Not elegant, but interesting.

    • @TheScotsalan
      @TheScotsalan 5 років тому +4

      @@NPFeifman Lots of parts, but all actually easy to make on a bridgeport and a lathe. Even the gears can be done on a mill with a dividing plate. Really clever design. Great to see.

  • @lanedexter6303
    @lanedexter6303 5 років тому +11

    There is a time, early in the development of a technology, be it automobiles, guns, aircraft, etc., when a great MANY inventors are trying a great MANY things. Then it all sort of settles down to “this is the way we do things.” But that time of wild and sometimes crazy inventiveness is fascinating. 😃. Thanks, Ian.

  • @Outlaw_Deadman1996
    @Outlaw_Deadman1996 5 років тому +34

    As someone who is half Irish and half Romanian it's finally nice to see Romanian firearms covered.

    • @MladenSpasinoviciMusicLibrary
      @MladenSpasinoviciMusicLibrary Рік тому +6

      Well in this video the Romanian firearms aren’t covered. They are literally exposed 😂

    • @HadrianTAZ
      @HadrianTAZ Рік тому +7

      ​@@MladenSpasinoviciMusicLibrary exposed for the beauty they are

    • @Jorjgasm
      @Jorjgasm Рік тому +1

      That's a combo I never heard of. I bet you can drink!

  • @cptreech
    @cptreech 5 років тому +6

    This is one of those actions that could use an animation a la C&Rsenal. One wonders if, with serious development, there were any features or advantages to this concept that might have been realised.

  • @laurianmoga8708
    @laurianmoga8708 4 роки тому +25

    Kudos to you, Ian, for getting the pronunciation
    just about right (except for the very last
    syllable). In Romanian, the name "Dimancea" sounds more or less like "Deemunchah", with the last syllable pronounced like the Cha-Cha dance.

  • @RangeTeaGaming
    @RangeTeaGaming 5 років тому +28

    Looks like a pistol from the star wars early years. Great video ian!

  • @DjDolHaus86
    @DjDolHaus86 5 років тому +10

    What I really like about revolvers is their mechanical simplicity...

  • @Redchrome1
    @Redchrome1 5 років тому +24

    I can tell how much work went into this video, based on the number of times you repeat yourself. You must have done a *lot* of takes on this.
    Keep up the good work - but make sure you get some rest in too!

  • @HadrianTAZ
    @HadrianTAZ Рік тому +3

    This is one of the coolest and rarest revolvers that I have seen on your channel! Haven't seen it in a museum yet but would be amazing to see upclose. Great video and the designer of this revolver was nothing short of a genius. It gives us something to admire all these years later.

  • @badnewsbruner
    @badnewsbruner 5 років тому +10

    Really love how this one disassembles! Also, the fact that the ENTIRE grip is solid wood is super epic! Great video Ian, as usual :)

  • @kirkmooneyham
    @kirkmooneyham 3 роки тому +43

    I think the mechanical engineering that was done in those days was amazing. Extremely complicated in many cases, but still amazing nonetheless.

  • @PaulP999
    @PaulP999 Рік тому

    Thanks for that - it brought the description in my Ian Hogg book into full clarity, I now look at the photo and "see" what's inside (like many others he has featured and you have shown me!).

  • @RaduB.
    @RaduB. 5 років тому +21

    Dee-mantcha. This is the right pronunciation.
    Interesting gun!
    Greetings from Romania.

  • @andywood6376
    @andywood6376 5 років тому +10

    I'm gonna need one of those C&Rsenal animations to understand this revolver.

  • @Mamurai
    @Mamurai 5 років тому +5

    Wow! Interesting places you're getting access to. This is really cool, and I hope to see more crazy firearms

  • @megapangolin1093
    @megapangolin1093 3 роки тому +3

    Totally impressed by your ability to take a gun apart like this. Fascinating.

  • @ionut1422
    @ionut1422 Рік тому +3

    I've never seen a gun so unique as this. True genius the man who invented it. He had vision. Great video. You really bring out guns that are forgotten and special. As a romanian I feel very proud to know about this revolver. I hope you will do videos about romanian forgotten wepons. Thank you. You are awsome.

  • @Arcelux
    @Arcelux Рік тому +3

    Nice, also Romanian here. First time hear of and see this gun! Thanks Ian!

  • @dp-2835
    @dp-2835 5 років тому +355

    I misread it as a revolver with rockets

    • @Raph584
      @Raph584 5 років тому +42

      i read "with pockets". that seemed practical

    • @LUR1FAX
      @LUR1FAX 5 років тому +25

      @@Raph584 I read "with sockets" haha.

    • @imm0rtalfury
      @imm0rtalfury 5 років тому +20

      The Volcanic revolver does sort of shoot rockets.

    • @ThatGuy-nv2wo
      @ThatGuy-nv2wo 5 років тому +19

      "With lockets", a revolver for her

    • @robertkowzan3145
      @robertkowzan3145 5 років тому +11

      i read "sprockets" but i didn't know what that is

  • @JamesFromTexas
    @JamesFromTexas 3 роки тому +5

    Looks like something I'd think I could fix and then realize how screwed I am after I pull it apart.

  • @M60E3MG
    @M60E3MG 5 років тому +131

    I don’t like to be *that* person, but it’s not a sprocket. A sprocket drives a chain or other flexible component with holes (e.g. film cameras have a sprocket to move the film). Cog would be the most accurate description, I believe.

    • @ForgottenWeapons
      @ForgottenWeapons  5 років тому +93

      Good point.

    • @M60E3MG
      @M60E3MG 5 років тому +44

      It’s what happens when you like mechanical things but have a degree in English.

    • @xx_mysticwolf_xx1492
      @xx_mysticwolf_xx1492 5 років тому +2

      Thomas Carlson I wouldn't think a degree in English would give such knowledge maybe one in mechanical engineering might though I'm sure that degree doesn't go over every single definition in the language ?

    • @MrHws5mp
      @MrHws5mp 5 років тому +37

      I suspect that 'ratchet' would be the best term for it, the trigger group performing the role of the 'pawl'.
      Of course, a whippersnapper well-versed in modern slang might find other reasons to describe it as 'ratchet'...

    • @burntorangeak
      @burntorangeak 5 років тому +4

      Sprag.

  • @AlexNaanou
    @AlexNaanou 5 років тому +70

    Interesting, the two hexagonal "stars" appear to be assemblable in two different ways (via the square peg), are they keyed in any way to prevent them from being put together out of timing?

  • @richardkirka5977
    @richardkirka5977 4 роки тому +8

    A lot of good-looking machine work and milling, even if the gun is a complicated, over-designed mechanism. I'd love to own one, just to admire the machining and crafstmanship.

  • @Flederratte
    @Flederratte 5 років тому +1

    Great mechanics :)
    Thanks for the video and for fumbeling with all the loose parts to show us how it works.

  • @almarnordby2034
    @almarnordby2034 5 років тому +31

    Thats a wierd firearm, love it.
    You did a great job explaining it though

  • @carliprofr
    @carliprofr 5 років тому +1

    Yan, une super vidéo, comme toujours. MERCI !!!

  • @jerryjohnsonii4181
    @jerryjohnsonii4181 5 років тому +1

    Very interesting revolver Ian. Thanks for showing it Sir

  • @ashleysmith3106
    @ashleysmith3106 4 роки тому +6

    With that operating system you could put a crank handle on the side and turn it into a Gatling-style machine pistol - it's even manufactured by the right company !

  • @johngraesser4911
    @johngraesser4911 5 років тому +4

    All the parts on rear facing rails instead of side mounted pins and screws, it actually came apart easier than some revolvers that I have seen where you have to fiddle the hand and trigger to get them both in and working together. No coiled mainspring in the grip that needs a pin to take tensioner off before it could be removed, and woe to anyone who wasn't shown the trick of putting a paper clip into the hole to pin the spring. I can feel kinship with the inventor of this gun, it would be the same sort of mechanism that I would end up with if I invented one. I could imagine someone looking at a stoner ar10 back in the 50's who asked, and there are just two pins holding this together? That take all the recoil, and using steel in aluminum to take all that recoil?

  • @therugburnz
    @therugburnz 4 роки тому

    The opening-locking mechanism is quite interesting and it's a revolver. I'm liking this episode.
    Thanx Ian

  • @sogerc1
    @sogerc1 5 років тому +2

    A striker fired revolver, now I've seen everything!

  • @alexandruianu8432
    @alexandruianu8432 5 років тому +59

    That's a damn odd and rare piece. BTW, it's pronounced close to Dimancha in Spanish.

    • @h-6191
      @h-6191 5 років тому +5

      1 week ago??

  • @laheu
    @laheu 5 років тому +15

    Despite the complex internals it seems like one of the simpler of revolver designs despite the very strange internals

    • @rhaynesify
      @rhaynesify 5 років тому +1

      laheu I agree it looks quite simplistic, just expensive for the machining side.

    • @Josh-gg6ct
      @Josh-gg6ct 5 років тому +2

      No it really doesn't if you want simple you want something like some of nagants revolvers ~4 moving parts including the cylinder and one spring.

  • @MikJ132
    @MikJ132 5 років тому +173

    Nice! Since you've done the PSL and this revolver, think you can also cover the Romanian Orita SMG?

    • @HereticalKitsune
      @HereticalKitsune 5 років тому +7

      At least in video form! www.forgottenweapons.com/romanian-orita-smg/

    • @eleminot2011
      @eleminot2011 5 років тому +4

      www.forgottenweapons.com/romanian-orita-smg/

    • @51WCDodge
      @51WCDodge 5 років тому +3

      Looks like the eqivalent of the Royal Navie's Humgrumit, or possibly the Flogol toggle? ( Those of a certain age in the UK will know exactaly what I mean)

    • @onik_dovah4354
      @onik_dovah4354 5 років тому +1

      Maaaa netrebnicule

    • @onik_dovah4354
      @onik_dovah4354 5 років тому

      Is voevode barbu mi au dat ban pe discord si acu nu mai is pe rpr poti sa mi dai link pls :)))

  • @aserta
    @aserta 5 років тому +8

    Whilst i can see why it was not accepted, i can't really fault the design. It's sturdy in all the right places and presents a very solid "wear" form. I mean, let's face it, whenever stuff like this pops out, it's made with tin and wire. This at least presents itself as a chunky weapon.

    • @ADiamandi
      @ADiamandi 7 місяців тому

      Yes quite chunky and revolver pawl, revolver lock and pivot axis that wear down on the usual revolvers are hard wearing due to the sproket design inmho, springs are better. This is 1885 and you have an easy to load and unload 38 cal revolver that I d love to see it fired in a C Rsenal trial.

  • @Taeerom
    @Taeerom 4 роки тому +7

    This looks more like a proof of concept for his trigger and striker mechanisms than a serious attempt at a military revolver. Considering the time, it could have been a very serious contender for a system that goes into a rifle destined to the trenches. While it is complicated, it is very well contained and depending on how it is integrated with the rest of the gun, this system might have survived the dirt and mud of ww1.

  • @wesleytownsend8214
    @wesleytownsend8214 5 років тому +1

    What unique looking revolver. Beautiful! I am so glad you do this.
    All the best to you and yours!

  • @CountForsycula
    @CountForsycula 5 років тому +32

    NOW IS THE TIME ON SPROCKETS WHEN WE REVOLVE!

    • @Thug_Nuts1
      @Thug_Nuts1 5 років тому +5

      SunshineCamo NOW IS THE TIME ON SPROCKETS WHEN WE MAKE AN OVERLY COMPLICATED REVOLVER
      (Btw favorite snl skit ever)

    • @thatguynameddan2136
      @thatguynameddan2136 5 років тому +2

      NOW IS THE TIME ON SPROCKETS WHEN WE DANCE.

    • @rooseveltbrentwood9654
      @rooseveltbrentwood9654 5 років тому +3

      SunshineCamo ja every time i go to eurotrash disney I make sure to visit otto the diseased bear.....

    • @MakeMeThinkAgain
      @MakeMeThinkAgain 5 років тому +3

      I was going to go for NOW IS THE TIME ON SPROCKETS WHEN WE SHOOT.

    • @Redmenace96
      @Redmenace96 3 роки тому +1

      Zee time on Shproh-kets.....

  • @azkrouzreimertz9784
    @azkrouzreimertz9784 5 років тому +134

    the concept of the gun isnt a complete waste but the finished product is a failure. too bad though because this could have been pretty intriguing.

    • @kenibnanak5554
      @kenibnanak5554 5 років тому +6

      Picture how much money the inventor wasted by not letting go of a poor concept.

  • @jb2186
    @jb2186 5 років тому +1

    Love your videos Ian very informative 🐺

  • @billbolton
    @billbolton 5 років тому +1

    Great video, truly a forgotten weapon, the weirder the better.

  • @Pcm979
    @Pcm979 5 років тому +2

    I really like it. I'd never want to use it, but I really like it.
    Which I say quite a lot on this channel now I think about it.

  • @phillipsullivan3400
    @phillipsullivan3400 5 років тому +3

    So the trigger and sprockets work together like the escapement in a clock. I wonder if that's where the inventor got the idea.

  • @jenavevesnowolf13
    @jenavevesnowolf13 5 років тому +2

    Really interesting design, but truly an answer to a question nobody asked; A solution in search of a problem, as it were.

  • @glockerbob
    @glockerbob 5 років тому +1

    Love it. Really like seeing strange revolvers and pistols.

  • @etherospike3936
    @etherospike3936 3 роки тому +2

    French: I will create an intricate revolver !
    Dimancea: Hold my tzuica !

  • @loquat4440
    @loquat4440 5 років тому +15

    I will give credit to the factory that was actually able to do the machining work for that revolver and make IIRC 1000 of them. Must have been very expensive to make considering all of the machining required. The only thing it does better than many of the designs in current use was you could in theory open the gun to eject all six and quickly reload. Looks like it was drop safe and with those large sprockets to never wear out assuming proper heat treatment. Very thick cylinder walls in the .38 chambering. It was certainly a beast of a revolver.

    • @observed00
      @observed00 5 років тому +6

      Looking at this as a gunsmith I think Ian has it wrong. Normal revolvers then and now have more parts, and the parts are very complex to manufacture. This revolver, with all its linear movement, has parts with straight lines, which are way easier and faster to make.

    • @loquat4440
      @loquat4440 5 років тому +2

      @@observed00 Some of the final revolvers of the 1870-90's seem simpler. But my major comment was about the amount of machining it was to make that Dimancea; it was a lot. The total number parts might not be more.
      Envision yourself Nick trying to duplicate that in your shop. When you are actually going in side of a block of steel to hollow it out. It is a lot of work. I have a belgium made 9,4 dutch military revolver that does look simpler to make.
      It is possible it was not so difficult due to welding the machined pieces together afterwards.
      Note I am not a machinist, But I have watched a gunsmith/manufacturer set up computer control equipment to make specific guns parts. Often making a new gun can be almost as challenging as designing the prototype was.

  • @connerymilne6466
    @connerymilne6466 4 роки тому +3

    I find it always so fascinating to learn about alternatives to traditional firearms technology, regardless of its complexity it is do cool so see outside the box thinking

  • @partypat2599
    @partypat2599 5 років тому +8

    They should add this to Red Dead. Always love strange revolvers

  • @Omnihil777
    @Omnihil777 5 років тому +7

    Love the patent, something entirely new, and that workmanship, looks awesome. I wanna feel the almost polished metal surfaces of the inner parts. Seems more like a swiss / german idea. Wonderful! I imagine the idea behind this was to get a smoother DA trigger pull and I might guess when it's sufficiently oiled / greased, it could fulfill that, kind of. The striker doesn't move very far and with good tolerances it should be lighter then moving a whole hammer around. There's room for improvement / simplification IMO, but sadly this idea hasn't evolved that much after this, has it?

  • @eugeneslagle7935
    @eugeneslagle7935 5 років тому +1

    Looks like the top block that is just above the striker is the actual cylinder stop because the cylinder has the square cuts for it to have the block slip forward into it.

  • @viewsandreviews180
    @viewsandreviews180 3 роки тому +2

    Good presentation and thank you for sharing this interesting firearm. You said no one adopted this pistol. I’m assuming the Elbonian Army wasn’t contacted.

  • @lolroflpmsl
    @lolroflpmsl 5 років тому

    I love these nitty-gritty teardown videos :D

  • @jaredanderson682
    @jaredanderson682 5 років тому +7

    Legend has it that Ian is still trying to hold all the pieces together to show the audience how it all works

  • @skooter21108
    @skooter21108 5 років тому +5

    I feel like the designer got half way through this project, realized it was gonna be impractical, then decided to go through with it anyway since he was too invested at that point.
    A risky strat to be sure; looks like it didn't pay off.

  • @andyd2960
    @andyd2960 5 років тому +2

    It always amazes me how complicated some of these older guns are.

  • @PhillyRacer121
    @PhillyRacer121 5 років тому +1

    Thinking about it from a machinists perspective. What a pita to make but very interesting. They didnt have fancy milling machines then, they had lathes and shapers and slotters.

  • @aceman1126
    @aceman1126 5 років тому +5

    While Ian did a great job explaining how this revolver works, I feel like a 3D animation would be immensely helpful for truly understanding it.

  • @mopar_dude9227
    @mopar_dude9227 5 років тому +1

    Just before you said it, I was thinking “wow, a striker fired revolver”. Love these strange firearms.

  • @LOUDcarBOMB
    @LOUDcarBOMB 5 років тому +1

    Ian is finally looking at guns in Paris. I bet Ian is loving that.

  • @henryrodgers7386
    @henryrodgers7386 5 років тому +10

    If he tried to sell this as a revolving rifle, I'd buy it. It really does look like an early automatic rifle frame attached to a revolver front.
    Being fairly modular, you could probably do quite a lot with this action, just slide on a different front bit and grip!
    I have ideas.

    • @michaelrizea3108
      @michaelrizea3108 5 років тому +2

      Romanian engineering.... European Engineering in general they test a lot of new Concepts Firearms down the line in history aren't really new technology they are just slightly more refined because the concepts themselves of the early Firearms were more just of a test bed

  • @j.sagiechode
    @j.sagiechode 5 років тому +3

    Beautifully Unique! kinda steam punk.. looks like it has more in common with some of the early machine guns.

  • @Full_Otto_Bismarck
    @Full_Otto_Bismarck 5 років тому +9

    When i seen "with sprockets" i was kinda hoping for more mike myers as Dieter.

  • @mottee
    @mottee 5 років тому +1

    Doing a trigger job for this would be a nightmare, a total of six sears to work with.

  • @edwalmsley1401
    @edwalmsley1401 5 років тому +10

    Was the swing out cylinder concept still covered by a patent when he designed this weapon ? It ended up doing the same function pretty much just was more complex,large and heavier so cant see why he would bother unless he was trying to work around some patent or something

  • @lucianene7741
    @lucianene7741 4 роки тому +3

    It's actually cool, it would look good in a Victorian crime drama or something of the sort.

  • @edwardburns24
    @edwardburns24 5 років тому +54

    But my question, is it hard to hold all the prices together to show how they work?

  • @IrenMasot
    @IrenMasot 3 роки тому +1

    I LOVED the lack of editing at 7:30, your hesitation and repeating yourself really drove home just how difficult this mechanism is overall. There's really no good way to parse it, is there?

  • @BV-fr8bf
    @BV-fr8bf 5 років тому +3

    It's an assault revolver. Thus the HUGE size.
    You can beat someone senseless when you run out of ammo.

  • @meade6291
    @meade6291 5 років тому +15

    When you're done filming a sticky/stuck firearm do the owners ever opt to take that moment to oil and maintain the piece before you reassemble it?

    • @Redmenace96
      @Redmenace96 3 роки тому +3

      I know it is valuable, but.... a little oiling, cleaning? carefully, ok.

  • @ggsound4492
    @ggsound4492 5 років тому

    7:24 editing mistake
    I love you mate!! You are like my uncle but he prefers wine at shooting videos

  • @WhiteNowa1
    @WhiteNowa1 Рік тому

    Thanks for the video!

  • @sejembalm
    @sejembalm 5 років тому +2

    "Dig that crazy, mixed-up plumbing." -This Island Earth (1955)

  • @matthayward7889
    @matthayward7889 5 років тому +3

    Cool and forgotten? Perfect!

  • @thomasborgsmidt9801
    @thomasborgsmidt9801 3 роки тому

    This reminds me of some math teachers that suggest a very complicted integral - and in 20 minutes twist and turns in formulas - and show it is really a very simple function, that could have been solved by a high school student in 5 minutes. But it shows off that the teacher is really great.

  • @JasonLihani
    @JasonLihani Рік тому

    Wow that is bonkers for the time period. It's so cool.

  • @browndd
    @browndd 5 років тому +7

    Man, that thing is weird as hell. I'm half surprised it even uses a trigger to fire.

  • @StrangerOman
    @StrangerOman 5 років тому

    Gusts of wind made this video a little bit more cozy than usual.

  • @Guysm1l3y
    @Guysm1l3y 5 років тому +1

    So it's kind of a striker fired revolver? Fascinating!

  • @gonzalez519
    @gonzalez519 5 років тому

    Way ahead of its time 👍👍

  • @yuryyanin7967
    @yuryyanin7967 Рік тому +4

    Too many ideas, thoughts and labor in every detail of it, resulting in a rather usual revolver, which could be much simpler. Ian was plying as kinda detective to understand all that and succeeded once again! Congrats!

  • @johnwoods3184
    @johnwoods3184 5 років тому +2

    Ok men, You're going to disassemble and assemble this blindfolded. And you're going to do it in 60 seconds!

  • @lukerickert5203
    @lukerickert5203 5 років тому +85

    What a cool revolver! That said it might be one of the worst examples of design for manufacturing and service ever created. It must have cost a fortune to produce, never mind being completely impractical the price would have doomed it alone.