Airbus Launches Airline, Route News & Airbus Order,
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 сер 2024
- Airbus has been given the green light to launch its freight airline with older Beluga aircraft. Meanwhile, EVA Air has finalised a landmark deal for the A350-1000 and A321neo as it enters a new era. Additionally, South African Airways is flying to Australia once more with an Airbus A340!
🔔 Become a member: bit.ly/DjsMemb...
🖥️ Visit the website: djsaviation.net
Connect with Dj's Aviation
🐦 X (Twitter): / djsaviation
👥 Facebook: / djsaviation
💬 Discord: / discord
💻 Patreon: / djsaviation
🌐 GlobeTrotting: bit.ly/Subscri...
BUSINESS ENQUIRIES
📧 Email: contactdjsaviation@gmail.com
CHECK OUT THE PODCAST
🎙️ Spotify: bit.ly/DjsAvia...
🎙️ Apple: bit.ly/DjsPodc...
ℹ️ MORE INFORMATION ℹ️
creativecommon...
Licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.0
-
-
-
-
-
🎵 OUTRO TRACK 🎵
Krys Talk - Fly Away [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.
• Krys Talk - Fly Away |...
Free Download / Stream ncs.io/flyaway
A sincere thank you to all the patrons, channel members and the wider community for your support.
#aviation #news #flight #aircraft #avgeek #airplane #airlines #airport #planespotting #airbus #boeing
In the absence of the Antonov Mrya, the Beluga venture is a smart move from Airbus.
It may have a nice volume but it can't even nearly be loaded as heavy or fly far
@@humongousballs It can carry things an average cargo aircraft can't carry, and it doesn't have to be something heavy. Range is not an issue because they can always land to refuel.
The two are not even comparable. An225 was a true heavy lifter. Beluga is more of a bulk lifter.
@@EdgyNumber1 People keep trying to state the obvious to me. I'm well aware of what the AN-225 is. The whole point I'm making is based on cargo size, not cargo weight.
W SAA for A340 Expansion. Hope this does provide more profit for the airline with good demand to Australia
Meanwhile Boeing management is learning how to tighten bolts 😂
Thanks for the updates DJ
I’m a big Boeing fan, but got to hand it to Airbus for looking at new sources of revenue with the Belugas
and other new cargo plane in the works is A350F.
plane manufacturers have fans? that's wild lol
I had always wondered about this because these giants have mileage left in them and I never believed Airbus would simply scrap them.
Airbus is a Plane maker... Boeing is a Blame maker
Vietjet Air pilot here. We have seen the Beluga at Danang airport in Vietnam a few times in the last few months. Could it be a route demo flight for its certification?
I agree with sainnt. It looks like airbus wants to start an Antonov Airlines - like operation of their own. If it succeeds I wonder what they will do with an A380.
Good for the companies & better & safer for the passenger
Thank you.
Listen DJA Airbus is getting orders and lots of them. It’s because they are reliable, test and certify properly AND don’t over sell their products. The deals made by ALL aircraft manufacturers are ALWAYS going to happen. Airbus has also building their products in multiple locations and countries and hence deliveries are being made from them. Airbus’ Business Model is streets ahead of Boering’s. Not just for Aircraft but ALL products and services.
So if they deliver non internal freight to and from the US how would they get around the airmail act of 1934? As far as I'm aware the act that forbid Aircraft Manufacturers from both making the aircraft and operating a commercial freight business from being the same entity is still in effect. I'd think they would have to exclude any US bound goods in this case. Even then it is possible if they change their nomenclature from a simple internal disposition to an actual freight line it would impact their own company to company parts distribution to the US if they use this for that purpose.
I agree
Are you going to cover Turkish Airlines confirming thier launch of Melbourne?
He did on his website
Boeing actually doesn’t have a great replacement for the 777-300ER anymore. The 777-8 is of a similar size yet has barely picked up any orders. The A350-1000 started off slowly but is really beginning to gain some momentum within the market. Maybe the 777-8 can do the same.
The A350-1000 is benefiting from the delay of the 777-9. While the 777-8 is more of a replacement for the 777-300ER, I think a high gross weight 787-10 will take over that role and that 777-8 airframe will be more successful as a freighter
@@sainntI'm sceptical about this so called 'high gross weight' 787 10, especially as 787 10 was intended for high density, Trans continental routes as opposed to long haul. 777 8 will be handy for Boeing as it will provide them with an ultra long haul aircraft to compete better with A350 types, as 787 falls short of range, as our national airline is finding out. Yes, granted, ultra long haul is a tiny market, but with 777 8, Boeing will have it covered
Flew BKK-DOH-LHR with Qatar the other day, coincidentally in a 777-300ER then an A350-1000. Obviously there is a big age difference that explains it but the difference in aircraft comfort/quality was pretty astounding.
@@dfgndfghdfghdfgh It would be just as astounding if you went from a 777 to a 787-9. That A350 was probably new.
@@sainnt did 787-9/777-300ER on the way out, the 777s are reallllllly showing their age now.
@DjsAviation I’m seeing the section 2:14-2:16 and am wondering whether the objects shown are used for alignment purposes. Are you aware of it? Could you please tell me a bit more about it and what they are called? Thanks!
A bit of a knee-jerk thought but why can't a Beluga size twin engine plane not be used for passengers? It's volume would allow possibly as many seats as the 380 - just an idea.
The airbus a320 has a lot of backlog because of many orders. Solution meybe is onother facility to take some backlog
They already have 4, Hamburg alone has 4x FAL’s and 2 in Toulouse. And ultimately when these orders get replaced by the A320 replacement they’ll all have to be converted
What's Up DJ?
Is the Beluga going to take up the slack from the antonov 225 ?
Some of it. The Beluga’s cargo hold is even a bit larger than the An-225s, but payload is greatly reduced at 53t vs 190t. Beluga also only has a fraction of the range. Both of those factors make the customer list rather short. Still better for Airbus than having them sit around though.
@@mrjakobt thank you for this information
Qantas A330 refurbishments
Love your channel mate, and so glad I found it.
Can I ask if you could do a post on Russian aviation ? We see that Russia didn’t return planes on loan from ‘rental companies’ (or whatever they are called) and that due to global restrictions, in Russia they cannot get new parts and take apart other planes.
Genuinely interested mate in what that means for aviation in an evil and sanctioned state, and I know you always do honest and balanced content.
Cheers…… Peace, Love & Reality x
A Virgin Atlantic Airbus plane has made an emergency landing at Manchester Airport after pilots reported "dense acrid smoke" in the cockpit. Weird MSM in America didn't cover this. Or the missing Airbus fasteners/plane swap, same day.
Flight VS77 had taken off from Manchester Airport Barbados this afternoon, but was forced to return after declaring an emergency over the Irish Sea around 20 minutes into the journey.
Why would US media cover a UK registered aircraft from a UK airline taking off from a UK airport? And the aircraft with missing fasteners would be a maintenance issue as the plane has been in service for 12 years, not 12 weeks old
Or Air Belgium retiring the A330 neo due to recurring engine issues..or the China Airlines A330 declaring an emergency due to pressurization issues,at cruising altitude, but it's Airbus, so it's a non news event.
The reason they ordered the Airbus A350. Is because Starlux Airlines ordered them.
a321
Guess Airbus would be wanting them 380s from emirates when they become life expired there if this plan of theirs works out
YAY
Boeing is suffering for their excess of accountants coupled with lack of engineers.... and a dodgy quality assurance system...
WHY DONT airbus build another facility in Wales? Their backlog is starting to get embarrassing. I have thought for a long time that Airbus does need another facility and a large injection of cash (now that cash to the steel works is stopped) from the British government would help no end; plus it would provide jobs in an area desperate for jobs.
They are adding FAL’s to Alabama and Tianjin. They just completed a new FAL in Toulouse
Since the UK is no longer part of the EU, it is no longer as easy for Airbus to transport parts back and forth as it used to be, as these components have to be treated like any other goods shipped between the UK and the EU. It is therefore very unlikely that an additional plant in Wales will cause any more stress. Brexit has consequences everywhere. And do you really believe that the government has money to spare for this? There was nothing for the steelworks either.
Airbus operating their own airline?
Isnt that a conflict of interest?
No, it has it's own AoC
A FREIGHTER AIRLINE
@@thisiskevin1000Ok. There are MULTIPLE CARGO OPERATORS AROUND THE WORLD.
So my question stands.
Antonov did that for decades.
Conflict of interest in which case exactly?
Oo
Why can't Boeing just behave?
Boeing causing more headaches for Airbus.
First
... your that perosn
not a competition
How is this legal? Boeing was forced to spin off its airline (United) but Airbus gets to start a new one??? This sounds like it might result in a sanction.
That restriction is only there in the USA, no problem as long as Airbus/AIBT doesn't carry freight to/from the USA. And if the USA wants to play the sanctions game, the EU can do the same, just better (mandatory inspection of every USA Boeing because of safety).
@apveening don't threaten me with a good time! Forcing 100% inspection? That would result in requiring airbus to do the same (since they currently do not, nor have they ever).
@@iggy2677 Doesn't matter, pretty soon the USA will be isolated.
My friend, the world does not revolve around the USA. It's a law in the US and only there. It's hard to believe, but there are more than a handful of other countries. And the plan to make the Belugas available for freight hire has been known for some time. And with Boeing's attitude of always trying to throw a spanner in the works, they would have been shouting and complaining loudly here too.
@iggy2677 mate that law is only in the us the world doesn't revolved around the o so good concerningly obese united states
Airbus are a victim of thier own success.. Good news for Boeing
Boeing have plenty of there own problems.
😂 this should be a Boeing order.
Why would anyone want to expand to handle a surge of orders and then have to turn around and contract when the order book shrinks? Better to manage deliveries to a sustainable level.
Can you please explain the thought processes behind this strange statement?