15 Incredible FUTURE Planes
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
- Ever since the Wright Brothers first took flight in 1903, humanity has been looking to the skies as our favorite means of fast travel. But the world of aviation has come a long way since and isn’t showing signs of slowing down anytime soon. From bigger passenger planes to supersonic private jets for the rich and famous, there will always be something on the horizon just waiting to blow our minds. So join us for today’s video, where we look at 15 of the most incredible concept planes!
#planes #future #top15
Several segments are licensed under creative commons
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
For more video information, please visit our website.
The Top Fives show brings you informational and entertaining top five videos! Join us and subscribe for more.
Follow Josh on Instagram! Founder and producer of the Top Fives show. Stay up to date with the channel and everything UA-cam and business related! / joshuajosephbaker
Follow us on Facebook!
/ topfivesyoutube
Contact us via the email form here: ua-cam.com/users/topfivesabout
Note: The videos featured on the Top Fives channel are for educational and informational purposes. If you have a good idea for a video, leave us a comment! We try to read each and every comment made. - Розваги
Thank you Top Fives video brilliant compliment.
Bot
I dreamed one time that I was in the year 2122 and the luxury planes at that time are ridiculously massive, space capable, and even contain escape pods. They're like flying towns.
Wake-up from dream !
2122 too early maybe in the 3000s or more
@@nickname5268 by the 3000s, we would've found a way into our neighboring solar systems and would have started cities on the (sort of) earth-like planet of TOI 700, it's not totally like earth but it could be habitatual if we wore suits outside protecting ourselves from harmful rays, otherwise we would have to live inside of specifically protective buildings. But it's not dangerously hot or with poisonous atmosphere like Venus, where we wouldn't be able to live in any way whatsoever.
But there is the even more earth-like planet of Kepler 452 which is very similar to earth in almost every way, atmosphere, weather, etc., and it would be safe to go outside just like here on earth. Except it's 1,700 light years away, so moving to and living there won't happen by the 3000s since no rocket can be built to travel as fast as light speed.
That's interesting.
See my above reply to @nickname5268.
@@iwanttolearnmore1467 It's ok to dream sometimes
They look very good designs.I would love another Concorde,with similar
design to be made.
These eco-designs are neat and all. But they're not cost effective...at all. Imagine how much it will cost to replace or maintain solar panels, high-capacity batteries, etc. The world's already suffering an economic crisis.
Exactly I wonder the cost it would be to fly with one of these so called future planes ✈️
Many designers of all-wing or wing/body or lifting fuselage volume planes have designed specifically to use only contemporary materials and avionics.
A lifting fuselage body like the '70s Boeing model 754 saves instant 30%+ fuel burn, but because it looks funny and because Boeing hates "not invented here" lifting fuselage volumes, they're not using it.
All makers from Russians to Airbus to Boeing & Lock-Mart and NASA all say it can have less empty weight and cost.
As this article starts off saying: "If it looks right it'll fly right" is a hard and fast rule permitting of no exceptions.
¹
Vhabw
@@JFrazer4303 I mean that's mostly true. But some jets are still too expensive to run despite "looking right". The Concord was a great jet, but had issues running at such high speeds and the ticket cost was exorbitant.
Fantastic and Perfect as Always, Thank You
Perfect? REALLY?
How would wind turbines on an aircraft make sense?
10:00 Your video is great !! Modern machines have helped us humans a lot at work
After ship videos its good idea making videos where is planes, futuristic planes are so interesting and i cant wait to see what we see in the future. That video's thumbnail's Air Europe plane looks amazing like a flying city but not realistic. Ireally like Eads voltair plane and Seastolvlj plane and Progress eagle too. Ps will you do video where is futuristic helicopters?🔥🔥
Great video!
Awesome Video
I like futuristic stuff
This video is so good ı like it
if the plane in the thumbnail was actually real then wow
(for starship point to point rocket travel - spiral/shuffle everyone in with window seats, flight attendants buckle you back in after your zero-g experience)
cant we just appreciate our current plane designs, these are too much for the future
I understand, but back then, people didn’t have these modern designs. They saw our current design as impossible. All im saying is sometimes, we need to exceed out expectations so we can have a better future.
🐼 Big Bear Hugs from a 68 yr old grandma in Kirby, Texas, USA 🐼 ❤ 🎀 ❤ 🎀 ❤ 🎀
The Monster Jumbo would be cool, and I do seethe Flying V becoming a reality.
Who else searches these things? Especially when they don’t exist
Bring on that new sleek Concorde version....nice!
A better title for this video: 15 Incredible Future Planes Which Will Never Exist
So true.
Will one dy,,fr sr
Top incredibles to exist in real life.
Nah, these are almost all very feasible, some likely in a few years.
@@aauwhatitdo1582 Don't hold you breath waiting for these pipe dreams to materialize.
Gravity is like a top centrifuges give energetic forces to deny g forces. How fast you wanna go is double AC thru a compression pulsed current neg ions push
15 incredible future planes that probably not happen
I can hope some of these designs are commercially viable in my lifetime. I admittedly would love to take a flight on something like the Progress Eagle.
0
Me too. If I'm still around in 30 years (am 47 now), I wonder how many of these aircrafts will be a reality by then
yea thats one very awesome looking airplane
what about Antonov An-325 Mriya (upgraded Mriya, new the biggest one aircraft)??
It isn't the design of planes that will speed things up. What will improve things are new, improved airports.
I've never been in a jumbo jet before
14:11 as long as we have the futuristic version of DC-10/KC-10/MD-11
Bro just gave us 16
Kindly give credits to original animation creators
Never seen or heard of the first plane, hopefully Airbus doesn't say it's an original design since the B-2 already exists
B2 wasn't even the first "in-wing" design either.
@@juangalton999 well it is the first reliable and operation one.
B-2 isn't reliable, it costs ~$500k+ per hour, can only be flown by military officers or test pilots and only in ejection seats because it relies entirely on expensive complexity to even stay in the air and if that complexity fails it's a death trap. (being operated by somebody with deep pockets and willing to throw gobs of money at it, isn't really a successful design).
Nobody has made a reliable user-friendly plane with out fins.
Meanwhile many all-wing planes with fins have flown, some remarkably well -better than "normal" planes.
The airbus maveric is not at all like the B-2, beyond that it doesn't have a tail carried on a static-drag tube fuselage.
And before we devolve into who made he first all-wing, it was Dunne in 1908 (Etrich with a manned glider in 1906). It was not only reliable and stable, it was too stable for the military. Needed as much room to turn as a plane 5x its size, but it would not stall. (The Dunne and the Etrich had fins, the Dunne's fins being on the swept wing-tips.)
@@JFrazer4303 What are you talking about. Of fucking course, the B2 is expensive and flown by military, it is the greatest fucking military aircraft in the world.
We are talking about how the design isn't new, because the military has already made this design on their B2. The B2 may not be the first researched flying wing, but it was the first developed and operational flying wing.
@@aauwhatitdo1582 I repeat: "being operated by somebody with deep pockets and willing to throw gobs of money at it, isn't really a successful design"
other than that they can say it is.
12:09 "... unlike anything we ever seen before"
Showing the most _Thunderbird 2_ resembling aircraft of all.
AND IN POUNDS!
You know, my great granddad was IN the R.A.F., and he ACTUALLY helped BUILD the Concord, he worked on the breaks
Epik
The airbus sounds good, but people expect a plane to look like they’re used to and to SEE out the window. I hope it works though..
I want to fly on the sky titanic
Very nice invention for future. KHB Lahore
It will take other three years for the as2 come in the market
The cruise plane got me ded
ผมชอบรูปแบบและดีไซน์ลำดับที่ 15 ผมอยากให้มีในอนาคต โดยเฉพาะในประเทศ ไทยแลนด์ สุดยอดทันสมัย
❤❤❤❤
Helium is cool lol but if you’re hanging out up there for awhile. Don’t loose track of reentry speeds it does heat up a bit . It’s. Potential energy is understood It at 144 atm is liquid
I like planes. I really would like to start some airline and aircraft companies. I like to travel by plane or car. I do not like trains that much. I only like trains during scenic routes like through wine country in Napa valley or through the mountains. I really like cruises that are peaceful with the right people. I really like the water and houses by the water.
The thumbnail was just the smallest most casual Emirates plsne
Hero zero is a pipe dream as batteries are so heavy to produce enough power to just move a car 300 miles think what they need for a plane.
Bro had a party of the video look like the Leo and stich airship
You know why the plane on the thumbnail would not fly?
It’s not aerodynamic.
first airplane looks like the pokémon Togekiss
Eviation Alice and Boom Supersonic are the only existing non traditional planes on the horizon.
Что с балансировкой аппарата Hero zero ?😮
The fact that everyone has a yt channel
Didn't know charlie sheen had so much interest in concept planes 👀
the thumbnail plane is probably bigger than the airport
cool
To make hydrogen requires a lot of energy and fossil fuels usually fits the bill so hydrogen + oxygen yield a tremendous amount of emissions. That is what is wrong with hydrogen power.
But if you use enough solar panels you will have enough power to make hydrogen power emission-free
@@abiesagimus4235 If you use solar panels, that means you can't use the ground under the solar panel to grow food and plants.
I meant on the wings
Boy!
Space liner is just a rocket that supposed to glide but how deos it deal with the fir is it really built for that
…It’s 2023 now one of the planes now exists
The thumbnail looks like something from Star Wars lol
That's the "sky cruise" an concept of an flying cruise ship
None of the wide wingplanes like the maverick will ever pass the 90 second emergency evacuation test. Till they find something like Bond-style ejector seats they will stay sci-fi.
Please tell me about accessibility for wheelchair users on airplane flights and ride and reusable airplanes in future
Oh my gosh that’s not possible
Its 2024 the futuristic Concorde is definitely not coming😂😂😂
❤I. Wish. To. See. U
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
i would fly on the boom and the xlr
I bought a jet for $2.8 billion.
So as usual, we shoot down simple approaches to vastly more efficient travel with no further consideration than "If it looks right, it'll fly right", and "My grandaddy didn't fly in planes like this so I aint gonna fly in it".
Or rather, what some talking heads and marketing execs think we're going to say or what should be said about it.
That said, the maveric needs to go back to the early 2000s Airbus VELA studies, which were more like the older Tu-404, with the fins inboard on the body instead of on the wingtips.
This has been holding us back since the late '30s, when Burnelli was supposed to get the contract that would become the A-20.
See the '70s Boeing model 754-759 lifting fuselage body designs they were trying to sell to operators like Cargolux, Husky, Emirates and the military. By their numbers; with the same engines & fuel load (and entirely contemporary well-known technologies) it would get x2+ the range/payload, onto shorter runways.
The Burnelli estate said they'd be happy to let it be license-built, and it came to the attention of Boeing brass and they hastily dropped it and have said that they have no interest and will not ever build to a lifting fuselage volume (despite it being an instant drastic jump in performance).
Also the recent Lock-Mart "hybrid wing/body" which is also entirely well-known 'tech, and much better performance.
While nobody is making any more jumbo liners, the idea of a plane that could if needed carry lots of people is still good for operators that fly mixed-use planes. A radical looking plane that uses no radical technology but will still offer efficiency is as simple as the Burnelli BG-177
If Airbus A380 is being retired can you explain the economics of a plane that is designed to carry 1400 passengers?
The eods volt air looks like a blimp
16. teleport plane
The Maverick, great in the design trying to omit turbulence, but I doubt no design can really eliminate this altogether and where are the windows? We should be seeing bigger windows if anything, if you cannot look out to appreciate what the gift of flight offers then I'm out in this respect as a passenger
Boeing TTBW, higher altitude usually equates to a smoother flight and its other attributes are appreciable
Hero 0, nothing wrong with the goals of this
Flying V, similarly good goals with this concept
Volt Air, Interesting concept visually but may be limited by its capacity
A350H, powerplants sound interesting, not sure about how practical the design and its other aims are though
Seastall VLJ, maybe..maybe not?
Synergy Aircraft, umm an aircraft that can be outpaced by a car and yet is likely to be easily way more expensive than one? Might just work in respect to its attributes otherwise in some niche markets though...
Monster Jumbo, may have a market if indeed it proves operationally economical
Progress Eagle, Who knows maybe it'll prove possible? The windows are all but useless though other than allowing light in as the design means you'd be looking out at nothing but fuselage, unless you're literally in the nose panorama, where I suspect only those who can afford that will be?
Spruce Whale, this seems to have the window related impairments of the Progress Eagle. Airships, if this turns out to be such a thing offered incredible views out, this will not.
AS2, I hope we can see the return and indeed betterment of former supersonic commercial air travel. It's literally embarrassing that the past bettered today in this respect... best of luck to them!
The Boom, it's heartening to know that there are companies striving to fill the gap Concorde left and that they aim to apply todays technology and the experiences of those times to have a new generation of faster than sound aircraft take off!
Airbus A321 XLR, not really a game changer, just what can be expected as things move on... I would hope that passengers would be spending less time in transit by taking air travel as things progress. Personally I wouldn't object to a slight premium if it meant I could board a supersonic aircraft, especially if that plane also offered a more open interior ambience with great views out by virtue of much larger windows in an airframe that also helped to mitigate turbulence rather than be faced with a long haul drag onboard something that really isn't giving much, passenger wise, over a jet plane of the last 4-5 decades had to give...
Spaceliner, likely only ever to be a privilege for the few, until anti-gravity systems are a generalised matter
We really need those electric airplanes ASAP to help the real problem, Global Warming!.
Well it's dreams for all and everyone
Lufthansa using hydrogen shows my older concept of a passive fuel system in its use but we need a motor with no moving parts. Expect the future to be wild and on it in space too
i wait cool 1
OLÁ AMIGOS PROPRIETÁRIA By, Niceli 😇🌞.
Ohhh This Generation...😤😤😤
WHY DOES EADS VOLT AIR LOOK LIKE A NUKE WITH WINGS
I like 6
The flying wing design for passenger liners are a non starter. Unless you ok with a lot of sick puppies and spilt coffee every time the plane banks! Could work well as a freighter.
This is always brought up, and always overstated.
People who fly go on to drive fast cars on curving roads, and they don't puke or die.
Some of them may die on ski slopes, but they're not bothered by odd G forces.
6
Saving fuel maybe attractive to the airline owners, but flying faster may not. Dreamliner used to be able to design the plane with 20% faster speed but with the cost of increase in fuel consumption, airline owners didn't like it. They'd rather to save some money on fuel cost than to get to the destination 20% faster.
Hi
You know if big planes have many engiens will retired
thinking
Ill keep my feet on the ground
King space yachts patent today 2023
Spruce whale is emirates smallest plane
also skycurise
Hope you’re thinking harder too
don't tell me nothing about the future that look depressing already
The Wright brothers were not the first to fly.
We not kids anymore bruh
Thr wings wud have to be longer n flexible
Youd want thrm folding itd be more practical on the ground .
Thrn ther are to many engines or thr wong type biuld thrt like a seaplane thrn you cud have a bubble of helium in thr top cabin to cause better lift at slower speed .
Thr one on thr cover story yea
Cud be done
Those look like air disasters
Better title 15 PLANES I MADE TO MAKE KIDS WATCH MY VIDEOS AND GET PAID
CRUISE PLANE? CRUSE SHIP MAKES MORE SENSE
You know nothing about aviation and these will probably never be built let alone used for passenger flying
Part
What a clickbait!!! I clicked on this video just to see an artist made a giant whale like and on each wings has 10 engines. Looks amazing in design & reminds me of the movie the Avengers flew and stood on top of the craft. Can’t remember the name of that plane.
Found it. It’s looks like the Helicarrier”
Thumbnail? Stopped watching when it's not on here.
Yeah fuel planes won’t be available in the future
F 11:32
Al Quran tofan herumurti