Concorde is to small to be brought back the USA did team with the Russian Tupolev which was bigger but needed full AB Reheat to go super-sonic severely limiting it's range, however in this US Russian project they gave the Tu-144 the engines from the Tupolev Tu-160 Blackjack to give the Concordski super-cruise ability it was just research
The concord was the first of its kind. Just because it was not the final answer doesn't mean that it could not evolve into something more suitable for commercial use.
I've been in the aerospace industry for 40 years and I've heard "this will change air travel forever" a thousand times, I can tell you now.... no it won't....
Seriously a very good channel. Lots of very interesting material presented in a terrific format with expert voice over. Thanks for posting. Its much appreciated.
People don't want to travel to airfields, large or small, to be herded on to planes. They want to travel city centre to city centre and the high speed train is a comfortable alternative that takes little or no longer from departure to arrival. The technology already exists.
None of the designs considered escape mechanisms for passengers and crew before an unavoidable crash. Only combat attack planes and bombers have escape seats. It is time to design something to save lives on civilian passenger airliners before a crash. It will cost millions extra but lives have infinite value. Thanks.
Personally, I'd rather ride a ginormous helium filled diridgible powered by solar cells embedded it its skin. Talk about green! Quiet! Spacious. It's a no-brainer!
I makes me hopeful that there are so many possible solutions, and some that aren't too far from commercial reality. I think long haul may have to just look at being as efficient as they can with jet fuel. Although the synthetic fuel being developed for F1 might be an option.
It's always interesting to see how technology is evolving and to anticipate the impact of change. One issue raised scares me--a potential trade war between Boeing, Airbus, and the new Chinese/Russian aircraft company. At present, industrial espionage is an ongoing problem. Throw in LawFare as global tech companies sue each other in order to gain total control over the market--monopoly power requires government force. It's not acknowledged, but direct action in the form of industrial sabotage, campaigns to slander corporate rivals, even extortion of executives takes place now. In the past piracy was used to drive off rival corporations. When anything goes because "it's just business," expect everything.
@@robertdragoff6909 I totally agree. 100% I do still want constant testing and progress with energy storage tech though. A bunch of little baby steps coming together over time is always the answer.
@@oldmanuserphan but it's not more green than petroleum. There's a science Channel that explains it in plain language why current EV technology will never be as green as petroleum.
At the rate of change were seeing at the moment, it will be many many years before we see a change in configuration. Bums on seats trumps canard wings every time.
As long as greed does not not take over, hope the airlnes flying the passenger versions of these aircrafts offer roomy seats with good leg space to their long-suffering customers ! 🤗
Well you won’t be able to fly soon in your 15 minute city. At least the rest of the world will be able to move around, your western masters will be whipping your sad arse into submission.
The one thing people who talk about electric or hydrogen powered vehicles never talk about is where do you get the electricity or hydrogen. If either were more efficient or less polluting, industry would have already adopted it. In most cases, we would burn the fuel on the ground to charge the batteries, then claim that the aircraft is zero emissions. This is just a shell game.
I also saw a solar hovercraft concept that can do 2machs at most and have 500max capacity. it has 2 floors and 1 bridge at the front tip. it looks like the ISS ship of Star Trek but smaller and "raw"-er. It looks like a cargo craft.
Electric flight is not economical with Lithium batteries. There are new battery technologies like Aluminum Graphene by GMG, and Sodium ion Graphene by CATL, which have 3 times the capacity and can be charged 17 times faster than Lithium Ions. They are in trial testing and will be available for sale next year and 2026 respectively.
If you use solar cells to power the on board electronics, it will not result in a massive reduction in fuel use, because they don't require much electricity. Also they wouldn't work at night, so you'd need heavy batteries. The speaker sure says a lot of weird stuff. Like the Russian aviation market being relevant, or claiming they could use Western engines.
You quote decades and multiple decades.. you simply won't believe how vastly different your life will be by 2030. Let's just say, this might not age well.
10:06 That's what happens when there is a gesigner, but no one with a slight idea of a center of mass and a lifting force. It's like a kid's picture. Fun, but totally impossible.
there are plenty of us who will be willing to pay for a 3hr flight plus it could change the way private owned jets are used. "the rich" could uber fly with planes like the boom plane.
Sorry, not sorry to burst the bubble, but almost none of these concepts will ever fly commercially. Only the ones that are economically feasible and able to cram as much passengers as possible on a given flight. That's how airlines make money. Not by flying ridiculous 3-story monstrosity 🤣 Even much more 'reasonable' A380 is not hugely profitable. To all those delusional commenters here, aviation tech is hard. Really hard. So don't fool yourselves 🤣
Didn't Rolls Royce flat out ditch Boom Supersonic? Their involvement was crucial to that airplane. Boom Supersonic may very well be doomed. As for that Sky Whale; it'll likely remain a concept design. Never mind we've already reached the size practical limits with A380.
@@masterfranklin1938 Sorry to disturb you, it seems I mistook your gender through your profile picture. I find woman with long hair very fascinating, and the longer it is the more beautiful it is to me. I do apologize for my mistake so I'll bid you farewell and you have a good life.
@@masterfranklin1938 Take my passion for them however you like, but ladies with Rapunzel length hair are far more attractive, and if they casually smoke even more so.
Much of this video assumes that CO2 is a pollutant but in reality it's simply plant food! If you care about having a green planet then you should want more of the nutrition called CO2 in the atmosphere!
Are you a 5th grader? Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that traps the sun's heat in the atmosphere and is gradually warming the planet. We are dumping far more CO2 into the atmosphere than all the plants and oceans can dispose of -- especially with destruction of the rain forests. Global warming will melt the ice caps and lead to catastrophic sea level rise. Humanity absolutely must work to LOWER CO2 in the atmosphere if we want to survive global warming.
@@markmh835 please show me non government funded peer reviewed evidence that CO2 is a green house gas! The earth is actually cooling right now not warming! Thanks to CO2 the earth is 15% greener then it was two decades ago and the northern hemisphere has significantly more trees then it did 100 years ago!
They should bring the concord back who else agrees?
Re invented: Oudated Technologies - Electronics - Materials, Engine Eficiency etc.: ua-cam.com/video/5pr5kCa2QfI/v-deo.html
Concorde is to small to be brought back
the USA did team with the Russian Tupolev which
was bigger but needed full AB Reheat to go super-sonic severely limiting it's range, however in this
US Russian project they gave the Tu-144 the
engines from the Tupolev Tu-160 Blackjack to give
the Concordski super-cruise ability
it was just research
Nope, too much noise, too much pollution
No one who has lived under its flight path.
The concord was the first of its kind. Just because it was not the final answer doesn't mean that it could not evolve into something more suitable for commercial use.
I've been in the aerospace industry for 40 years and I've heard "this will change air travel forever" a thousand times, I can tell you now.... no it won't....
Hi. love your videos but chapters would be a great help.
Bravo Upload..
Mind Blowing..
Wright Brothers Must Be Smiling..
Excellent documentary, for the New future.
God bless you all fellas,.🙏.
Seriously a very good channel. Lots of very interesting material presented in a terrific format with expert voice over. Thanks for posting. Its much appreciated.
Thanks for watching Joe!
Marry Christmas 🎄
And a hippy new year!
First and merry Christmas to you
People don't want to travel to airfields, large or small, to be herded on to planes. They want to travel city centre to city centre and the high speed train is a comfortable alternative that takes little or no longer from departure to arrival. The technology already exists.
Great presentation but you missed LILIUM
This guy doesn't seem to know that Embraer also designs and manufactures its own planes and is the third largest aircraft manufacturer in the world.
Super boulot, très intéressant. Merci à toi, à bientôt
interesting ideas
None of the designs considered escape mechanisms for passengers and crew before an unavoidable crash. Only combat attack planes and bombers have escape seats. It is time to design something to save lives on civilian passenger airliners before a crash. It will cost millions extra but lives have infinite value. Thanks.
Personally, I'd rather ride a ginormous helium filled diridgible powered by solar cells embedded it its skin. Talk about green! Quiet! Spacious. It's a no-brainer!
SureFly!!!!!! Ever heard of Ehang??
Nuclear power is the best way to run these airplanes.
Oooo... Coal powered airplanes!
The electricity doesn't just magically appear. And battery manufacturing is VERY environmentally unfriendly.
Don't worry, Coal Power is being replaced by sustainable power everyday
I makes me hopeful that there are so many possible solutions, and some that aren't too far from commercial reality. I think long haul may have to just look at being as efficient as they can with jet fuel. Although the synthetic fuel being developed for F1 might be an option.
Yeah, right :D
I bet, in 40 years we'll still be flying in tubes with wings. Fuel might be different, but i'm sure shape will stay the same
Craig? You'll never catch me on one of those...
It's always interesting to see how technology is evolving and to anticipate the impact of change.
One issue raised scares me--a potential trade war between Boeing, Airbus, and the new Chinese/Russian aircraft company. At present, industrial espionage is an ongoing problem. Throw in LawFare as global tech companies sue each other in order to gain total control over the market--monopoly power requires government force. It's not acknowledged, but direct action in the form of industrial sabotage, campaigns to slander corporate rivals, even extortion of executives takes place now. In the past piracy was used to drive off rival corporations. When anything goes because "it's just business," expect everything.
They all say battery powered, that isnt green until you say how those batteries are powered. I doubt its 100% green energy.
More green than petroleum is still a win. It's not an all or nothing concept.
Batteries, no….
But Hydrogen has potential.
It can't be with the materials needed to create the batteries. MUCH harder on the environment than any oil drilling.
@@robertdragoff6909 I totally agree. 100% I do still want constant testing and progress with energy storage tech though. A bunch of little baby steps coming together over time is always the answer.
@@oldmanuserphan but it's not more green than petroleum. There's a science Channel that explains it in plain language why current EV technology will never be as green as petroleum.
Tyler Mac we want air Canada with Toronto maple leafs colors
Embraer and Otto aren't mentioned because...?
At the rate of change were seeing at the moment, it will be many many years before we see a change in configuration. Bums on seats trumps canard wings every time.
As long as greed does not not take over, hope the airlnes flying the passenger versions of these aircrafts offer roomy seats with good leg space to their long-suffering customers ! 🤗
What do you think fuels innovation, the end goal of every plane shown is gobs and gobs of profit.
You forgot about Virgin Galactic. Their goal is a low earth orbit space liner.
"In a world where..." made me laugh for some reason.
A lot of SNL spoofs start like that.
Anyone here watch Simple History? Narratior sounds awfully familiar.
„ … clearly influenced by those being made by Boeing and airbus …“ Well or by aerodynamics and similar necessities?
The Cr929 no one that matters will want it
Well you won’t be able to fly soon in your 15 minute city. At least the rest of the world will be able to move around, your western masters will be whipping your sad arse into submission.
06'53"
Moog Incorporated?
So, it is a flying synthesizer?
Eviation:
I'd rather see an e-Osprey?
Interesting, but pass on the China/ Russia jv, thank you 😅
The one thing people who talk about electric or hydrogen powered vehicles never talk about is where do you get the electricity or hydrogen. If either were more efficient or less polluting, industry would have already adopted it. In most cases, we would burn the fuel on the ground to charge the batteries, then claim that the aircraft is zero emissions. This is just a shell game.
50 years plus to catch up with Concorde's 1960s tech. The Tupolev famously crashed at the Paris airshow.
because a French jet came to close trying to take photo
I think he missed one. Boom is also working on a HYPER sonic passenger jet that will go at Mach5.
I also saw a solar hovercraft concept that can do 2machs at most and have 500max capacity. it has 2 floors and 1 bridge at the front tip. it looks like the ISS ship of Star Trek but smaller and "raw"-er. It looks like a cargo craft.
I, can't wait to fix their engine and fly them.
Barriers are far from green ever google how a battery for an electric car is made u will chg ur mind on all the electric bs pretty quick
Electric flight is not economical with Lithium batteries.
There are new battery technologies like Aluminum Graphene by GMG, and Sodium ion Graphene by CATL, which have 3 times the capacity and can be charged 17 times faster than Lithium Ions.
They are in trial testing and will be available for sale next year and 2026 respectively.
I agree electric planes don't seem economical at scale
@@topfives I think hydrogen hybrid electric will come on top in aviation and big trucks.
If you use solar cells to power the on board electronics, it will not result in a massive reduction in fuel use, because they don't require much electricity. Also they wouldn't work at night, so you'd need heavy batteries.
The speaker sure says a lot of weird stuff. Like the Russian aviation market being relevant, or claiming they could use Western engines.
While battery electric is fine for small airplanes; there's more of a future for hydrogen with larger models.
Is all of this from alien 👽 technology?
You quote decades and multiple decades.. you simply won't believe how vastly different your life will be by 2030. Let's just say, this might not age well.
America needs highspeed rail..
Solar powered blimps for long trips and E planes for shorter trips.
Aren't blimps really bad for the environment with how the gas needs to be handled?
ion prop in space? ok
Ion prop in the atmosphere??? ah ah ah ah ah ah ...
10:06
That's what happens when there is a gesigner, but no one with a slight idea of a center of mass and a lifting force.
It's like a kid's picture. Fun, but totally impossible.
8:16 where engine?
there are plenty of us who will be willing to pay for a 3hr flight plus it could change the way private owned jets are used. "the rich" could uber fly with planes like the boom plane.
🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️
Sorry, not sorry to burst the bubble, but almost none of these concepts will ever fly commercially. Only the ones that are economically feasible and able to cram as much passengers as possible on a given flight. That's how airlines make money. Not by flying ridiculous 3-story monstrosity 🤣 Even much more 'reasonable' A380 is not hugely profitable. To all those delusional commenters here, aviation tech is hard. Really hard. So don't fool yourselves 🤣
Where is the plane in the thumb nail?
Need a mach prop 4 the electrix
Didn't Rolls Royce flat out ditch Boom Supersonic? Their involvement was crucial to that airplane. Boom Supersonic may very well be doomed.
As for that Sky Whale; it'll likely remain a concept design. Never mind we've already reached the size practical limits with A380.
I’ll never ride of made in China passenger plane.
China tops the list for an innovative idea of a regular airliner based on airbus and using GE engines... WHAT!?!?!?!
You can’t change travel when something’s so ridiculous, it’s never going to happen, waste of time and energy.
Hi
Fantastic picture, happen to be a lady with very long hair? I find that quite attractive, please describe it?
@@danielobrien1571 what in the Sam Hill are you talking about?!?
@@masterfranklin1938 Sorry to disturb you, it seems I mistook your gender through your profile picture. I find woman with long hair very fascinating, and the longer it is the more beautiful it is to me. I do apologize for my mistake so I'll bid you farewell and you have a good life.
@@danielobrien1571 ok… that’s a bit weird, but fair well.
@@masterfranklin1938 Take my passion for them however you like, but ladies with Rapunzel length hair are far more attractive, and if they casually smoke even more so.
yeah, get efed Boeing and airbus !!!
People could say and what they think but I would never go in an electric plane, EVER
How bout when the plane is takin a nose dive toward earth ? Would you still want a plane whos wings are loaded to tons of fuel in them?
I wouldnt fly on a CRAIC airliner ever.
People need electric jet engines for going to space the world might flood.
that voice uuuurgghhhhh
ничего интересного и перспективного не показано.
looks like a toy
NOTHING NEW SINCE TW0 DECADE ALWAYS REPEATING
Much of this video assumes that CO2 is a pollutant but in reality it's simply plant food! If you care about having a green planet then you should want more of the nutrition called CO2 in the atmosphere!
It kinda is at the rate we are going. Do some research
Are you a 5th grader? Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that traps the sun's heat in the atmosphere and is gradually warming the planet. We are dumping far more CO2 into the atmosphere than all the plants and oceans can dispose of -- especially with destruction of the rain forests. Global warming will melt the ice caps and lead to catastrophic sea level rise. Humanity absolutely must work to LOWER CO2 in the atmosphere if we want to survive global warming.
@@markmh835 please show me non government funded peer reviewed evidence that CO2 is a green house gas!
The earth is actually cooling right now not warming!
Thanks to CO2 the earth is 15% greener then it was two decades ago and the northern hemisphere has significantly more trees then it did 100 years ago!
Democrat claptrap.
Use kerosene. Its cheap, supply is virtually limitless and it's environmental impact is negligible.
Or not.