15 Never-Built Commercial Planes we nearly got

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 чер 2024
  • NEW CHANNEL:
    • Launched from the bigg...
    Discord: / discord
    My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @foundandexplained
    Patreon:
    / foundandexplained
    Chapters:
    0:29 - Hawker-Siddeley HS141 (VTOL passenger jet)
    1:10 - Lockheed L-500 (triple-decker cargo plane)
    2:31 - Boeing 747X (Boeing's large cargo/passenger plane)
    3:48 - McDonnell-Douglas MD-12 (their version of a jumbo jet)
    4:43 - Lockheed-Martin Very Large Transport (really big cargo plane in a second video)
    5:20 - Aerocon Dash 1.6 Wingship (big Ekranoplane)
    6:03 - Boeing Sonic Cruiser (almost supersonic transport)
    6:42 - Sukhoi KR-860 (large passenger plane with folding wings)
    7:22 - FMA IA 36 Condor (engines inside the main hull)
    8:16 - Saab 1073 (baby widebody plane)
    9:00 - 728 Jet (50-100 passenger plane)
    9:34 - Plane train (plane propulsion while riding on or hanging from rails)
    10:03 - Boeing 7J7 (propfan planes, efficient but loud)
    10:53 - Tupolev Tu-404 (It's big. Not not that big, bigger. Bigger than that!)
    Chapters by @toddkes5890

КОМЕНТАРІ • 598

  • @amandanewport9483
    @amandanewport9483 4 місяці тому +35

    8:16 the baby widebody plane is so adorable, so I agree with you

  • @wormyboot
    @wormyboot Рік тому +553

    Every time a cool idea dies because it was too loud, I yell "THEN MAKE IT A CARGO PLANE!"

    • @KnightRanger38
      @KnightRanger38 Рік тому +72

      Often the biggest issue is not the noise inside the plane - but the noise outside it.

    • @rolflandale2565
      @rolflandale2565 Рік тому +7

      Bombers had fantastic movie thriller debunk safety features. They were intended far more critical handling supply, so they are great for classic revive & approval, EVs & passengers services. With new ⛽ & 🔋mods.

    • @Reason077
      @Reason077 Рік тому +26

      Cargo planes still often need to fly into regular city airports, and many are very sensitive about noise. So the same noise regulations apply.

    • @markfox1545
      @markfox1545 Рік тому +7

      Really? Wow, that must be mildly embarrassing if you're in a supermarket or a meeting at work or at a funeral. I'm sorry you have this affliction.

    • @RadioMan2023
      @RadioMan2023 Рік тому +2

      @@markfox1545
      Lmao

  • @Hammerhead547
    @Hammerhead547 Рік тому +183

    Fun Fact:
    The MD12 was actually featured as a purchasable aircraft in Toei Interactive's 1993 airline business simulation AeroBiz Supersonic.

    • @SAUBER_KH7
      @SAUBER_KH7 Рік тому +5

      That's cool!

    • @HC-cb4yp
      @HC-cb4yp Рік тому +6

      I LOVED that game. Is there a modern equivalent?

    • @SAUBER_KH7
      @SAUBER_KH7 Рік тому +3

      @@HC-cb4yp not that I'm aware of. There are two games that are similar come to mind: The first one is sim airport. Although that one focuses on you building an airport in addition to hosting flights. Another one is transport fever 2. Although that one is more than just planes. You can pick a starting date anywhere between 1850 and 2000, though the earliest aircraft are available In 1920 onward. You can progress through the ages and unlock newer vehicles. Either one would be a good choice in my opinion.

    • @revaholic
      @revaholic Рік тому +3

      Given the safety record of the DC-10 and MD-11 I don't know if I would have trusted that company to pack even more lives into their planes.

    • @Hammerhead547
      @Hammerhead547 Рік тому +1

      @@revaholic
      From what I remember of the game (I haven't played it in 25 years) one of the trade offs of buying the MD12 was that it had a higher chance of crashing if you didn't lavish it with maintenance money.

  • @SomeOrdinaryJanitor
    @SomeOrdinaryJanitor Рік тому +195

    the Boeing 2707 is the only never built passenger aircraft i wish was completed, even if only for a museum.

    • @nenuu91iscool
      @nenuu91iscool Рік тому +4

      it's a really beautiful aircraft

    • @vf-31tomcatters
      @vf-31tomcatters Рік тому +6

      Theres a mock up in some storage somewhere and if a museum acquired it, we had something similar tonthat

    • @Darakusillygoober
      @Darakusillygoober Рік тому

      It was too ahead of its time

    • @johnjmcknightiii2964
      @johnjmcknightiii2964 Рік тому +2

      Just the front section of the 2707-300 exits sadly the remaining sections of the mockup deteriorated

  • @toddkes5890
    @toddkes5890 Рік тому +252

    Chapters:
    0:29 - Hawker-Siddeley HS141 (VTOL passenger jet)
    1:10 - Lockheed L-500 (triple-decker cargo plane)
    2:31 - Boeing 747X (Boeing's large cargo/passenger plane)
    3:48 - McDonnell-Douglas MD-12 (their version of a jumbo jet)
    4:43 - Lockheed-Martin Very Large Transport (really big cargo plane in a second video)
    5:20 - Aerocon Dash 1.6 Wingship (big Ekranoplane)
    6:03 - Boeing Sonic Cruiser (almost supersonic transport)
    6:42 - Sukhoi KR-860 (large passenger plane with folding wings)
    7:22 - FMA IA 36 Condor (engines inside the main hull)
    8:16 - Saab 1073 (baby widebody plane)
    9:00 - Dornier 728 (50-100 passenger plane)
    9:34 - Plane train (plane propulsion while riding on or hanging from rails)
    10:03 - Boeing 7J7 (propfan planes, efficient but loud)
    10:53 - Tupolev Tu-404 (It's big. Not not that big, bigger. Bigger than that!)

  • @TechGroupF430i
    @TechGroupF430i Рік тому +62

    Regarding the FMA IA 36 Condor, specifically at 7:42, I'm pretty sure there was no plan to have *anyone* sitting in that part of the plane. I mean beyond the rear doors (only accessible when the engines are off of course), it seems far more realistic that that part of the cabin would've been exclusively for luggage.

    • @ecurtis5615
      @ecurtis5615 4 місяці тому +2

      Indeed! Also I don't see that heat would've been an issue, since the exhaust would have been directed out of the rear & away from the fuselage...

  • @poodlescone9700
    @poodlescone9700 Рік тому +169

    An ekranoplane for Trans Pacific or Trans Atlantic routes makes the most sense. It takes much less gas to fly tens of feet above the water.

    • @bongodrumzz
      @bongodrumzz Рік тому +33

      The Ekranoplane for the Trans Pacific route would have been perfect, especially as its speed would allow it to outrun potential weather issues, high wave fronts etc. Lagoons built at various way stations in the Pacific in Tonga, Samoa and the Cook Islands for example, as well as Hawaii and the Philippines would clearly have been a way to bring tourism and its benefits to an ever growing economy there too, what's not to like?

    • @SethMethCS
      @SethMethCS Рік тому +18

      @@bongodrumzz and the plane can be designed to fly (albeit very inefficiently) in the event there’s a undetected cargo ship in the flight lane.

    • @facuufernandezz5070
      @facuufernandezz5070 Рік тому +45

      the problem with that are the waves. that design only works for lakes or some rivers

    • @rizkidary837
      @rizkidary837 Рік тому +12

      @@facuufernandezz5070 or ocean with small wave height (example : Java sea)

    • @mikes8155
      @mikes8155 Рік тому +6

      Even taking into account the increased drag from the surface of the water due to surface tension?
      Either the craft would be slower or would need larger engines at least

  • @keithad6485
    @keithad6485 9 місяців тому +23

    The Aerocon Dash featured in this vid, is clearly inspired by the Soviet 1960s era Ekranoplan or Caspian Sea Monster as it was nicknamed - Which was actually built and used by the Soviets.

    • @stanleybuchan4610
      @stanleybuchan4610 2 місяці тому +2

      Only for use in the Caspian. It couldn't fly over oceans because of the large waves.

    • @marhawkman303
      @marhawkman303 22 дні тому

      @@stanleybuchan4610 That was the basic flaw yea. the surface effect needs a FLAT surface. Hitting a wave at speed would be catastrophic.

  • @Marylandbrony
    @Marylandbrony Рік тому +34

    The 7J7 would make a perfect commuter plane beyond Japan actually. Think Washington D.C to New York or London to Paris.

  • @Joannes808
    @Joannes808 Рік тому +13

    The Ahrens AR 404 and Baade 152 had always been my picks for abandoned airliner projects. Like the FMA IA 36, I just always loved seeing such unexpected things coming up from the left field nations.

  • @ronriesinger7755
    @ronriesinger7755 Рік тому +6

    The MD-12 was physically the most attractive of this list.

  • @martykarr7058
    @martykarr7058 6 місяців тому +13

    The L-5100 isn't the only time they pitched a commercialized version of a military plane. The B-29, B-36, and YB-49 had civilian spinoffs, with the first two prototyped. And North American, as part of their pitch for the XB-70 offered an entry into the SST competition based on the Valkyrie.

    • @Truex007
      @Truex007 5 місяців тому +2

      dude, a civilian Valkyrie would have been SICK!

  • @FormulaOneLeclerc
    @FormulaOneLeclerc Рік тому +27

    I just love the fact that the Lockheed was so big that the company literally just called it "Very Large"

  • @jimsvideos7201
    @jimsvideos7201 Рік тому +35

    The Tu-404 is interesting in its engineering but apart from maybe hauling liquid fuel it'd be hard to make effective use of it.

    • @Shoorit
      @Shoorit Рік тому +5

      Flying gulag

  • @86hix
    @86hix Рік тому +20

    Yes, please, do a video about the never-built commercial supersonic planes ! Your 3D planes always look great; can't wait to see the SST Lockeed !

    • @rolflandale2565
      @rolflandale2565 Рік тому +3

      Yeah more 3D spec performance. Also, put them ALL in a contest with the Microsoft Simulator as the Ump!

  • @robrepass2179
    @robrepass2179 Рік тому +4

    For me I think the 747x and MD-12 deserved a spot in the Aviation industry

    • @Sjkho7901
      @Sjkho7901 Місяць тому

      So Boeing 747X Didn't Exist in 2024

  • @WyvernApalis
    @WyvernApalis Рік тому +15

    *Shows TU-404 being a massive aircraft*
    Ace combat: WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN

  • @WisnuAditya-cc5ux
    @WisnuAditya-cc5ux Рік тому +15

    Great vid as always
    Now we need the military version of this Never-Built series as well

  • @serge7633
    @serge7633 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for sharing mate. Keep up the good work. 👍

  • @shatter5593
    @shatter5593 Рік тому +3

    The Saab 1073 looks like one of those toy airplanes I would play with as a kid.

  • @jonathanriddle3465
    @jonathanriddle3465 Рік тому +8

    I would love to see a video just like this talking about the super sonic airliners we lost such as the Concorde.

  • @balcy129YT
    @balcy129YT Рік тому +6

    Great Vid Keep it up watching from Australia

  • @repairman22
    @repairman22 Рік тому +14

    Excellent video friend. I also make 3D videos on engines and cars but with solidworks, not with blender. I will have to start using it. Great video again!

  • @rsookchand919
    @rsookchand919 7 місяців тому +2

    I like to think there’s a alternate timeline where these were in service

  • @darrenwest9319
    @darrenwest9319 Рік тому +11

    There was a 767 double decker concept that never made it to production. That would make an interesting video. :)

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  Рік тому +6

      Your right the 767x…

    • @Abirdguy
      @Abirdguy 3 місяці тому

      Wouldn’t that just be a A380? But with 2 engines

  • @CarlosConsorcioCastellanoPerez

    The Lockheed VLT should have been built IMO.

  • @hawkmoon419
    @hawkmoon419 Рік тому +3

    Thanks for the cool video. Could have mentioned the Convair 37 which was the proposed airliner version of XC-99 transport.
    Would definitely like a video about SSTs that were never built.

  • @theorangeoof926
    @theorangeoof926 Рік тому +7

    Oh if only we had those planes flying around today…anyways great work.

  • @merafirewing6591
    @merafirewing6591 Рік тому +8

    Pretty sad that the 747X and MD-12 and Lockheed's Very Large Transport never got the chance to take off.

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 2 місяці тому

      probably range, cost fuel, cost operation and other things. tbh these 3 planes has to be my favorite

  • @CaptKak1954
    @CaptKak1954 Рік тому +4

    I am so disgusted and offended that they betrayed my boy Saab 1073 😢

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 2 місяці тому +1

      too small, short range and problems that is what i was thinking

  • @hungarianlad9734
    @hungarianlad9734 Рік тому +5

    You guys should do one for fighters, that would be super interesting

    • @nolesy34
      @nolesy34 Рік тому

      A fighter commercialised now that would be a sweet ny york to london

  • @FajarRizkiBachsinar
    @FajarRizkiBachsinar 4 місяці тому +1

    I like both the 747X, MD 12, & the KR 860

  • @stickynorth
    @stickynorth 8 місяців тому +5

    The HS141 I think is the most fascinating because VTOL aircraft are still some of the most difficult to design and operate and yet when they do offer the most versatile operations possible especially in nations like Canada where most people live in very dense increasingly mega-sized cities spread out across vast distances... And yes please make a second video focusing on just SST projects both Commercial and Private as both have had their dizzying share of concepts all unbuilt thus far...

  • @TomCrippsTrains
    @TomCrippsTrains 3 місяці тому +2

    Sonic Cruiser honestly looks like something from my wildest dreams, such a stunning 'could have been'

  • @Raul1971xxx
    @Raul1971xxx Рік тому +2

    The 728 looks very cute.. 🙂👍🇪🇸

  • @ChessMasterNate
    @ChessMasterNate Рік тому +7

    We need a video on possible future eVTOLs. There are apparently more than 100 startups, but most will probably never make anything. There are a number of interesting prototypes though. Probably a lot of work to make such an episode, as you have to make at least 4 CGI models.

  • @georgehernandez4079
    @georgehernandez4079 Рік тому +1

    I’m in love with the 747X!!

  • @sigurdurmarolafsson4183
    @sigurdurmarolafsson4183 7 годин тому

    The thought of a tail strike on the Condor is super scary.

  • @blackhawk69100
    @blackhawk69100 Рік тому +3

    A great collection. Super sonic version would be great

  • @ChristoAbrie
    @ChristoAbrie Місяць тому

    Gotta say, that Lockheed VLT looks insane

  • @Chimpunk729
    @Chimpunk729 Рік тому +3

    Great video...su kr860 is my favorite

  • @SethMethCS
    @SethMethCS Рік тому +15

    IMO the FMA IA 36 Condor and SAAB 1073 have solid niches that could make a program successful if the designs were picked up by someone with the same determination as the Founder of Boom supersonic. The best part is being able to adapt existing tech instead of developing novel tech for the critical aircraft systems.

    • @farhanatashiga3721
      @farhanatashiga3721 Рік тому

      Unfortunately people with those kinds of ambition and determination are more inclined to chase novel ideas such as supersonic travel than the simple regional jet transport.

  • @DJAYPAZ
    @DJAYPAZ Рік тому +5

    Interesting video. I would like to see a video about full scale mock-ups like the one that was built for the American competitor for the Concorde. It never made past the mock-up stage.

  • @kendallfleet
    @kendallfleet 7 місяців тому +1

    The last one is like a kids idea of a “dream jet”

  • @jimsvideos7201
    @jimsvideos7201 Рік тому +3

    BAe 146: Has four engines because six wouldn't fit.
    HS 141: Lol, noob.

  • @stangundam01
    @stangundam01 Рік тому +3

    some of the planes that really should get another look are the lockeed very large transport, boeing super pelican, lockeed L-500 & aerocon

  • @richardbriansmith8562
    @richardbriansmith8562 4 місяці тому

    Awesome Video 😊

  • @eolay903
    @eolay903 Рік тому +2

    The Boeing sonic cruiser should have been built, it sucks how we don’t have many interesting commercial airliners nowadays

  • @shakawhenthewallsfell8570
    @shakawhenthewallsfell8570 Рік тому +3

    I think there was a Boeing Blended Wingbody concept. It was smaller than the Tu-404 and would be powered by three (I think) GE-90 engines on inverted pylons at the back.

  • @Mr_oof_blox
    @Mr_oof_blox 8 місяців тому +1

    8:09 Thank you for flying Ryanair, last year over 90% of our gear broken

  • @leezinke4351
    @leezinke4351 Рік тому +2

    Boeing sonic cruiser look very gorgeous!

  • @mauretaniafan1133
    @mauretaniafan1133 Рік тому

    why do i love the look of double-decker planes so much?

  • @colinboneham7387
    @colinboneham7387 Рік тому +1

    VC10 double decker got missed of the list imo, it would have been the only T Tail double decker ever.

  • @Zreknarf
    @Zreknarf Рік тому

    ground effect planes are so cool, hope someone builds one some day

  • @DEP717
    @DEP717 Рік тому +6

    The Argentine Airliner might have been able to use asbestos as both heat and sound insulation, but they would need a lot of it. The Boeing 727, and L-1011 pulled similar stuff off. Granted that was with engines of a later generation.
    Argentina's shift makes me think, they could have gotten into the position Brazil got into with Embraer. Of course, the question is if the tech and market conditions could have lined up for them in that time frame as opposed to Embraer's. The Argentine jet was designed by Kurt Tank, who had designed the FW-200 Condor and the FW-190 Fighter in the 1930s and 40s.

  • @roaling
    @roaling 8 місяців тому +2

    Bro that 404 is fricking massive how is that only 1000 passengers 1000 singapore first class passengers?

  • @ACNordstrom
    @ACNordstrom Рік тому +1

    An acronoplane passenger jet would be cool

  • @biohazardia4608
    @biohazardia4608 Рік тому +1

    I think that the Boeing Sonic Cruser as well as the Sukoi KR-860 are the best concept aircrafts. The first one for speedtravelling, better than Concorde, the KR-860 for comfortabe transport of lots people and a great cargo amount.

  • @aristeidislykas7163
    @aristeidislykas7163 Рік тому +4

    01:17 "...civil version..." What a pity they did not build it! Every airplane should also come in a more gentle, civil version!

    • @infernaldaedra
      @infernaldaedra Рік тому +1

      If you've ever been inside a c-5 galaxy it's straight fckn mind bogglingly huge in the cargo bay

    • @CarlosConsorcioCastellanoPerez
      @CarlosConsorcioCastellanoPerez Рік тому +1

      @@infernaldaedra bro yeah I just remember being amazed how high the roof was, things are like flying apartment blocks.

    • @infernaldaedra
      @infernaldaedra Рік тому

      @@CarlosConsorcioCastellanoPerez almost enough room to play football in there lol

  • @pepitolevrai2255
    @pepitolevrai2255 Рік тому +1

    More of this with cargo plane pls

  • @dangerotterisrea
    @dangerotterisrea Рік тому +3

    A WIG commercial aircraft would be awesome

  • @Bucketroo
    @Bucketroo 2 місяці тому +1

    Astounding how you manage to talk about the Aerocon Dash 1.6 Wingship without ever uttering the word "ekranoplan", WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT IT IS!
    10:16 - It sounds like you're saying "prop-fed technology". These types of engines were known as "unducted fans" at the time, and some did enter service.

  • @trainglen22
    @trainglen22 Рік тому +1

    Holy crap, the Flying wing is huge!

  • @patrickracer43
    @patrickracer43 4 місяці тому

    Lockheed-Maritn, designing the VLT: "look, we all might not like each other, but I need your help with this plane"
    Boeing and Airbus: "lmao no, we won't help you with your pipe dream cargo plane"

  • @Egyptstudio1919
    @Egyptstudio1919 Місяць тому

    The wingship looks like something i would see in aviation dreamcore

  • @LeftistUprising
    @LeftistUprising Рік тому +2

    0:05 - I want my planes to ALWAYS be the most boring thing ever.

  • @MrTaxiRob
    @MrTaxiRob Рік тому +3

    A passenger version of the AN-225 would have been amazing. China was going to develop one under license from Antonov before the bottom fell out of the industry.

  • @ChessMasterNate
    @ChessMasterNate Рік тому +4

    Oh, could you do one on the quad-chopper version of the Osprey?

  • @smurftums
    @smurftums 4 місяці тому

    Aurora D8 comes to mind. A video on that would be interesting. :)

  • @newhank21
    @newhank21 Рік тому

    You should explore one of the craziest seaplane concepts, the Saunders Roe Queen, a 1000 passenger flying boat designed to fly to Australia.

  • @warrenwattles8397
    @warrenwattles8397 Рік тому +2

    Fairy Rotodyne would have been a crazy passenger aircraft

    • @paulmcgown7504
      @paulmcgown7504 Рік тому

      Crazy yes and a fuel pig that would have no commercial application today. Designed for city to city market it would also have been unpopular due to the noise for take off. Saying that, US marines insisted of reinventing the wheel with the Osprey V-22, even more complicated and with the embarrassing tendency to fall out of the sky.

  • @bobbysenterprises3220
    @bobbysenterprises3220 Рік тому

    In the late 80s early 90s Cadillac had bodies for the Alante built in Italy and flew them over to Michigan on 747s. I can't remember how many the did at a time but they were only mostly finished bodies so we're not loaded as finished vehicles with fluids.

  • @TrailRat2000
    @TrailRat2000 Рік тому +2

    I'd definitely like to learn more about supersonic aircraft. And possibly see a video about scram jet tech.

    • @goldthree9964
      @goldthree9964 Рік тому

      It’s Scramjet actually it’s all one word it’s a common mistake dude

    • @TrailRat2000
      @TrailRat2000 Рік тому

      @@goldthree9964I'm not sure it's entirely important for the sake of a UA-cam comment but while we're discussing proper language etiquette...
      "Scramjet, dude, all one word."
      But thank you for bringing my error to my attention. I shall endeavour to remedy this issue going forward.

  • @antontsau
    @antontsau Рік тому +1

    big planes (double and even triple deckers) all have the same problem - if something happens you have to transport corpses by dump tracks. No one will be able to jump out in time (90sec!) before it turns to fire and smoke grave. Its the reason why A380 was never made in single-class configuration with about 700 passengers onboard, even it required only seat reconfiguration.

  • @antoinepepin1892
    @antoinepepin1892 Рік тому +1

    The Condor looks amazing! Of course, the Lockheed-Martin Very Large Transport is a beauty with a massive sci-fi look but the Condor really does it for me! Thank you, Found And Explained for this video!

  • @kimboost9686
    @kimboost9686 Місяць тому +1

    12:00 I love the music

  • @monkee-remig.
    @monkee-remig. 2 місяці тому

    the first shot of the video was in my dream

  • @sevcankaya3157
    @sevcankaya3157 Рік тому

    Thank you

  • @yungphan9273
    @yungphan9273 4 місяці тому +1

    Good video!😃👍

  • @Dedyouth
    @Dedyouth 3 місяці тому

    anyone else notice, when the commentator says subscribe, the subscribe button lights up? pretty cool feature

  • @richardlionheart3965
    @richardlionheart3965 2 місяці тому

    The book "Stuck on the drawing board" is great for more info on the British vstol airliners and lots of other UK designs that never made it for economic or political reasons.

  • @audacity60
    @audacity60 Рік тому

    The double deck Vickers VC-10 spin off from 1965. The Airbus A300-600 rebuilt as a A330-100. The BAE Avro RJX.

  • @arypramana6154
    @arypramana6154 Рік тому +1

    A lot of these is just
    Plane: haha me big
    Fuel: *bonjour*

  • @Duvstep910
    @Duvstep910 Рік тому +1

    i love the soviets' larger-than-life thinking

  • @Ravenous1369
    @Ravenous1369 Рік тому +2

    This may sound weird but I'm still not over the loss of the Sonic Cruiser. It was one of the first concept aircraft I learned about while it was in development after catching some Discovery Channel special about future planes back in '01 and to me it still looks way cooler than any conventional aircraft we've gotten since. Course that's exactly the sort of reason why it didn't pan out, still I'm on the lookout for a nice model to own and hope that some flight sim developer somewhere has decided to put that beauty into their game for weirdos like me.

  • @JerlDabucol
    @JerlDabucol Місяць тому

    The McDonnell Douglas Md-12 was an Airbus A380 competitor.

  • @Nucleon-7
    @Nucleon-7 Місяць тому

    That war robots background music is fire🔥

  • @HAYAOLEONE
    @HAYAOLEONE Рік тому +1

    Like the SAAB and the one from Argentina.

  • @edmundschultz6648
    @edmundschultz6648 Рік тому

    Airplanes like the L500 (high wing) would have a difficult time getting certified for extended fights over water. Think about where the fuselage would be if the plane ever had to ditch aka miracle on the Hudson.

  • @tony13joes74
    @tony13joes74 4 місяці тому

    8:17 the sab 1708 is literally a atl-98 but with engines

  • @dxutube
    @dxutube Рік тому

    Also issues with noise & emergency escape procedures

  • @user-yc2oz8kc5k
    @user-yc2oz8kc5k Місяць тому

    (6:02) The Boeing Sonic Cruiser to me has the look of the future generation of jetliners. Airbus is also testing a small scale model of a similar looking aircraft. For these reasons I am convinced this is the look their later jetliners are going to adopt. The technology to build these is already available.

  • @artfrontgalleries1818
    @artfrontgalleries1818 Рік тому

    I'm filing this under "dumb but fun." Thanks. I just completed a flight from Milan to Newark 9.5 hours plus the 6 hour time difference. It will take me days to recover

  • @draggonsgate
    @draggonsgate Рік тому

    The Saab is so cute!

  • @noahbowie5985
    @noahbowie5985 Рік тому +1

    The problem with the sonic cruiser is that it was neither fast nor fuel efficient enough. Concorde worked bc it was fast enough to offset the fuel inefficiency

  • @craze5001
    @craze5001 Рік тому

    You earned a subscriber!

  • @Thrust-or-Bust
    @Thrust-or-Bust Рік тому

    5:00 looks like one of the thunderbirds

  • @user-lz4zm8fl7s
    @user-lz4zm8fl7s 5 місяців тому

    Wish u could make one video on Aeroslider transportation system.

  • @user-kq2gz2vp3q
    @user-kq2gz2vp3q 8 місяців тому +1

    Do the Antonov 2000, Concorde, Boeing 777, and Airbus 350

  • @syngabes
    @syngabes 7 місяців тому +2

    dude i really dont know why the saab 1073 failed. it is so damn cute bro

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 6 місяців тому

      size were too small