‘Ludicrous robes’: Anti-monarchists justify stance to Piers Morgan

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 205

  • @rossilavery
    @rossilavery Рік тому +334

    Stop having deserving and intelligent adversaries on to debate if you are terrified of letting them speak and make a valid point.

  • @d00risk1
    @d00risk1 Рік тому +112

    Disappointed for the first time the way you acted in an interview, Morgan.
    You did not allow them to put their point across, you keep cutting them off in every turn. BS interview. get over yourself and if you invite others to debate a subject, they should be given time to do so and not jump in every time they open their mouth just because you disagree with their point of view. We the audience are rubbed to hear both side.
    I guess if Jordan Peterson watched this interview, would have called you a narcissist and a bigot.
    As I said, disappointing

    • @merrickforrester5238
      @merrickforrester5238 Рік тому +1

      You never heard the fat tw t do this before? He cannot stand to hear another person speak. The worlds worst interviewer.

    • @poppinc8145
      @poppinc8145 Рік тому +20

      Morgan always does this. He's just hell bent on not listening. I agree with him 70% of the time, but he's wrong 30% of the time.

    • @s80rlmx9
      @s80rlmx9 Рік тому +15

      really? this is the first time for you?

    • @castaholic8665
      @castaholic8665 Рік тому +8

      For the first time? Sounds like cope to me 😂

    • @gjbsarmeri3957
      @gjbsarmeri3957 Рік тому +1

      And even with the little they said, they still completely destroyed him. "I have information and facts that prove royal family doesn't affect tourism"
      Pierce: "I disagree."

  • @theuser810
    @theuser810 Рік тому +57

    I am quite dissapointed with Piers' conduct on this occasion.
    1. Anti-monarchists state that they believe that the monarchy is undemocratic, corrupt, low quality leadership and gives too much power to one person. Piers replies asking about how the monarchy have a popular global image, but this does not address the republicans' original concerns.
    2. The republicans claim that few British people care about the monarch. Piers replies about how royal events represent Britain in a positive light to the world, implying that global perception is of great importance, but again, this does not address the claim of low domestic popularity,
    3. The republicans respond about how a few events do not justify the monarchy's scandals, and about how Piers fiercely criticised MPs spending public money on their own extravagance, while the monarchy does the same. Piers responds about how the monarchs deserve that money because they give that money to charity. However, this did not convince me because that money could have just not been taxed, helping poor people. The republicans also respond about how they could give charity as a private citizen.
    4. Piers states that they need wealth to be a royal family to keep up the "magic". Piers did not explain why something "magical" needs millions of pounds annually.
    5. They then argue about robes, which was kinda funny.
    6. In terms of tourism, the republicans argue that the monarchy do not bring much money, while Piers does. It's very much one's word against another's, but the republicans were able to give specific examples, like Cheshire zoo.
    7. Piers talk about William's campaign against homelessness, the republicans suggest that the monarchy money could be diverted to help homeless people, but piers uses ad hominem to suggest that they dont care about the homeless.
    8. The republicans claim that a monarchy is not required to solve problems, and piers calls them "negative" people, and that they should "ignore" it. However, the reason Piers invited them was because of their anti-monarchist views, so he could discuss them.
    9. piers then states that the monarchy is purely ceremonious, but he does not prove why, and does not address a lot of the earlier concerns.
    10. They bet £10 at the end, that was also pretty funny.
    I do find Piers morgan and his interviews interesting, but he did not really convince me of his side this time.

  • @DiHiongTan
    @DiHiongTan Рік тому +99

    I love how Pires respectfully listens instead of talking over his guests whose assigned role was to prove him wrong through argumentative points; giving them a deserving opportunity to “prove him wrong”.

    • @josiahsmith7059
      @josiahsmith7059 Рік тому +6

      he didnt do that this debate lol

    • @DiHiongTan
      @DiHiongTan Рік тому +28

      @@josiahsmith7059 it was sarcasm 🤣

    • @cincyaadi
      @cincyaadi Рік тому +4

      I loved that he didnt interfere after every sentence.

    • @DiHiongTan
      @DiHiongTan Рік тому +2

      @@cincyaadi hahaha yea. Not at all. He is such a respectful and attentive listener.

  • @endodouble6691
    @endodouble6691 Рік тому +65

    They really thought this was a good idea?
    Piers Morgan isn't a particularly bright individual, he's just loud.
    He couldn't take on one of them if they were drunk, let alone both at the same time.

  • @harryfranklin1263
    @harryfranklin1263 Рік тому +45

    It's fascinating to watch Piers say completely meaningless points with the confidence of someone who is delivering a debate-ending zinger

  • @rons4345
    @rons4345 Рік тому +93

    07:11
    Alex: Piers, that's the most ludicrous thing you've said on the show and that's saying a lot.
    Piers: The bar is low I agree.
    Did Piers just self-roast? Or is he too dense to realise that he self-roasted?

    • @areyousrsrightneowbro
      @areyousrsrightneowbro Рік тому +12

      What he meant was: if THAT was the most ludicrous thing he has said, then the bar for his most ludicrous statement is quite tame. He’s claiming that his claim is not actually ludicrous, and using this claim to get back at the opposition and turning it into a compliment, as this would imply all his prior statements could never get worse than such a tamely ludicrous statement. Regardless of whether or not his claim is ludicrous or not, it was definitely not a self roast as his intention was not in that direction

    • @Tabaluca911
      @Tabaluca911 Рік тому

      ​@@areyousrsrightneowbro It surely wasnt his intend. But he also doesnt intend being the dumbass he is so whats your point?

  • @thebestofnations
    @thebestofnations 9 місяців тому +4

    Those disliking Piers’ conduct, this is how he ALWAYS debates an opposing view to his own. You just don’t realise it because you’re usually blinded by favour of his view. Now you disagree.

  • @dreinhard52
    @dreinhard52 Рік тому +33

    Piers if you have people on your show , let them talk stop always interrupting.

  • @nicksap4234
    @nicksap4234 Рік тому +59

    The royals own massive land, fishing, mineral and oil rights in England, along with a large portion of its treasures, which all should be returned to the people who were abused to get it.

    • @NoWindNoSunNoPower
      @NoWindNoSunNoPower Рік тому +2

      Who are these people who were abused and how were they abused?

    • @jariwa7479
      @jariwa7479 Рік тому +16

      @@NoWindNoSunNoPowereveryone

    • @MrGwandrin
      @MrGwandrin Рік тому +10

      @@NoWindNoSunNoPower Nigeria for example

    • @Halal_Lettuce
      @Halal_Lettuce Рік тому

      Then I think we should dissolve the country of Mongolia because Genghis Khan began to massacre newly conquered peoples of the Mongol Empire.
      The future is now old man.

    • @arturincdh4095
      @arturincdh4095 Рік тому +7

      ​@@NoWindNoSunNoPowerthe irish, welsh, english, scotts, south africans, namibians, nigerians, irakis, indians, and the list goes on and on

  • @chisle25
    @chisle25 Рік тому +23

    Morgan wakes up every day thinking "which is it gonna be today: Meghan or trans people?"

  • @sylwiapro2791
    @sylwiapro2791 10 місяців тому +5

    Piers is definitely not afraid to look stupid, I'll give him that...

  • @rashedalmazi3343
    @rashedalmazi3343 Рік тому +54

    You know Graham and Alex have a valid point. We should think about it

  • @enclave6285
    @enclave6285 10 місяців тому +11

    “So you don’t like the homeless.”
    “So you don’t like the homeless.”
    “So you don’t like the homeless.”
    -Piers, afraid to actually listen because he’s got no good arguments

  • @clairerobin6207
    @clairerobin6207 Рік тому +30

    GB is stuck 1,000 years in the past. It's not preserving tradition, it's a failure to move into the future. Of course PM defends the Monarchy, he's all about that nose in the air superiority and "I'm never wrong about anything." Do you want to know why PM is always right? Because he says so.

    • @NoWindNoSunNoPower
      @NoWindNoSunNoPower Рік тому +2

      Yet the monarchy is very different to 1000 years ago.

    • @clairerobin6207
      @clairerobin6207 Рік тому +4

      @@NoWindNoSunNoPower Did you watch the coronation, they talked about how many of the rituals were traditional from hundreds of years ago? The people are different, the buildings they live in are merely refurbished, the paintings are original, the furniture is about as old fashioned as it gets. The way they see us and the world is very similar to the past. How is it VERY different. Their everyday clothes are new and their food, everything else is the same as hundreds of year ago. The monarch is not very different from the distant past, it's why Princess Diana didn't fit in.

    • @arturincdh4095
      @arturincdh4095 Рік тому +1

      ​@@NoWindNoSunNoPowerif you like them so much, why dont you pay the £50 million out of your own pocket🤡?

    • @ieuanclouter8494
      @ieuanclouter8494 9 місяців тому

      ​@@clairerobin6207We are the most hypocritical country on this earth, second would probably be China.

  • @deanna6472
    @deanna6472 Рік тому +25

    I'm Canadian and I believe it should be abolished. Here in Canada even if we buy our own property, it's still not ours the land still belongs to the King. They've gotta go
    They can commit any crime and can not be charged, they pay no taxes while the rest of us do. What are they good for.
    If not abolish, then let England have them and release Canada from the common wealth.

    • @NoWindNoSunNoPower
      @NoWindNoSunNoPower Рік тому

      Not true.

    • @Halal_Lettuce
      @Halal_Lettuce Рік тому +1

      1. Canada is a fully sovereign state that leave or remain in the Commonwealth should they wish to.
      2. The Canadian and British Monarchy are two separate institutions, it just so happens that both institutions are led by the same person.
      3. The Monarch and Royal Family do pay taxes.
      4. Private property is not Royal property.
      5. You don’t pay taxes to the Monarchy, you pay them to the Government.
      Are there any other false information you’d like me to correct for you?

    • @arturincdh4095
      @arturincdh4095 Рік тому

      ​@@helsby1797yes it is🤡. Royals are scum. Theyve been before and they still are. The fact that the rats are hiding in the sewers foesnt mean there are no rats at all

    • @arturincdh4095
      @arturincdh4095 Рік тому

      ​@@Halal_Lettucethe royal fammily isnt required to pay taxes🤡 and yes, every bit of land inside the commonwealth belongs to the royal fammily, and they can legally take it anytime they want. And noww youre gonna say "uuuuh, but they dont really do that" which is completely irrelevant; nobody should have that kind of power, be it de facto or on paper. And yes, they ARE inmune to the law, as we could clearly see with diana's "accident" or that pedophile andrew

    • @SoroushTorkian
      @SoroushTorkian Рік тому

      I'm Canadian and the King's role in our government is ceremonial, as much as it's ceremonial in other commonwealth countries. I have made this comparison before when I made a teenager only to find out it was false.

  • @webleydevelopment
    @webleydevelopment Рік тому +48

    Its remarkable Piers morgan is still relevant.

  • @Tatticoram
    @Tatticoram Рік тому +34

    Piers refuses to listen to anybody. He will never learn anything if he doesn’t listen!

  • @dapawap
    @dapawap Рік тому +7

    Listen to the noisy bossy Piers talk over everyone. In Australian we don’t want this old feudal class system

  • @Cellular1880
    @Cellular1880 11 місяців тому +3

    We are in the hole for 20 million but the Monarchy are worth every penny ?
    Tell that to the people who que outside my flat every friday for the food bank

  • @nataliagraziowska3422
    @nataliagraziowska3422 11 місяців тому +4

    They definitely proved Piers wrong, even though he was trying very hard not to let them speak their minds. And, as usual, Piers Morgan was very disrespectful for his guests.

  • @grilledsleaze
    @grilledsleaze Рік тому +29

    As an American I can confirm that I view the royal family’s costumes as gawd damn hilarious 🤡🤡

  • @mickmorrison
    @mickmorrison Рік тому +2

    We don’t know the security cost for the Windsors. There is a court case running just now and the argument is it could cause a security breach if potential attackers knew the how much this security cost. The taxpayers are entitled to know that figure as we pay for it.

  • @beck0n527
    @beck0n527 Рік тому +4

    Yes, Piers, no other countries have traditions or tourism. Brava. Excellent maneuver.

  • @CreatingChaos
    @CreatingChaos Рік тому +18

    I hate Piers too much to watch this.. thumbs down

  • @-Neutron-Star
    @-Neutron-Star Рік тому +7

    Piers Morgan lives in such a bubble; He needs to get his butt off that chair and go and visit Indian and Caribbean and ask them people about the Monarchy!

  • @lennonation
    @lennonation 9 місяців тому +2

    India loves the British monarchy? Is this guy high or something??! XD bro I am Indian and generations have starved to death and overcome 200 years of slavery under British empire.....Piers morgan is living in a fantasy world lol

  • @harveyzorawar7739
    @harveyzorawar7739 Рік тому +10

    Piers looked stressed in this debate lol

  • @dapawap
    @dapawap Рік тому +2

    A class system can never be any good!

  • @jackieledger7695
    @jackieledger7695 9 днів тому

    Christ sake , Piers won’t let them talk !!!
    Rude and one sided ! Disgusting and clearly Piers is blinkered !

  • @Teezy_Ty
    @Teezy_Ty 6 місяців тому

    I can tell you as a South African no one gives a toss about the Royal Family

  • @beircheartaghaistin2332
    @beircheartaghaistin2332 9 місяців тому +1

    And this is a real world example of why anti-theism exists

  • @leslieblake9
    @leslieblake9 Рік тому +4

    from the outset, you can pin point the moment Piers says in his head 'Shiiiiiiiiiit! he has a brain, eh, "what have you got against the monarchy?" *phew, stopped him before he said something academic*

  • @BigJuggles
    @BigJuggles 9 місяців тому +1

    Peirs’ notes preparing for an interview: “knockdown straw men and yell over everyone”.

  • @sirdino4t7
    @sirdino4t7 16 днів тому

    Piers' best arguments where either "You're wrong" or "no."

  • @gjbsarmeri3957
    @gjbsarmeri3957 Рік тому +2

    "I have information and facts that prove royal family doesn't affect tourism"
    Pierce: "I disagree, you're just haters."
    Sums up Pierce Morgan's interviews in a nutshell

  • @CorrespondentMedia
    @CorrespondentMedia Рік тому +5

    Graham is brilliant in explaining how democracy works

  • @eoinoconnor5783
    @eoinoconnor5783 Рік тому +2

    “God save him”
    Very out of character for you Alex 😅

  • @Niaulc-sx1nl
    @Niaulc-sx1nl Рік тому +2

    This was a typical Morgan interview - Morgan speaks 90% of the time.

  • @vuzzler1
    @vuzzler1 Рік тому +2

    I think piers is infatuated with someone in the royal family.

  • @ralphsimpson5230
    @ralphsimpson5230 8 місяців тому

    Of course every family needs Nine Palaces and maintained by their Serfs.

  • @xXxXxX-x-XxXxXx
    @xXxXxX-x-XxXxXx Рік тому +1

    I think piers used a goofy sound to cut the anti-monarchist in a funny/ironic way.
    It makes it funnier, that he was the one who got cut by it.
    lol

  • @josuenavarro9897
    @josuenavarro9897 Рік тому +1

    What is the point of having a time limit if you're not willing to let them explain their point, this man is a joke

  • @retrosuperbox8434
    @retrosuperbox8434 Рік тому +2

    Pires normally switched in, but got seriously rattled by these two. This "new" segment was not what it promised. Instead it was just Pires shouting and interjecting for 9 minutes

  • @justicebeske5704
    @justicebeske5704 9 місяців тому

    What kind of debate is this? Is there an audience that votes on who wins? No, you’re trying to convince a guy who’s basically payed to have this opinion and has control of the broadcast. It’s also too gamified to be a discussion.

  • @stormhawk3319
    @stormhawk3319 8 місяців тому

    Piers interrupts every time they try to make their point.
    Bad manners from a suck up to the establishment.

  • @TheYeetusLord
    @TheYeetusLord 7 місяців тому

    Piers is "denial" personified XD What a clown

  • @KimChapman-ko3hz
    @KimChapman-ko3hz Рік тому +11

    Im Australian and many of us dont want the Commonwealth

  • @ignaciogonzales7341
    @ignaciogonzales7341 Рік тому

    Do they see the money back in the economy?? Or is it that just want they spend??

  • @NigerianBeautyQueen
    @NigerianBeautyQueen 2 місяці тому

    I missed the parts where the guests were actually allowed to complete a sentence 😅
    Piers is a mess

  • @florencehildebrand8823
    @florencehildebrand8823 Рік тому +2

    Thank you

  • @kevincasey3603
    @kevincasey3603 5 місяців тому

    Condo-ize Buckingham Palace!

  • @ignaciogonzales7341
    @ignaciogonzales7341 Рік тому

    P.s nobody cares after we go about our days😂😂😂 just put them in regular clothing🤷🏻‍♂️🤣

  • @louisstone7525
    @louisstone7525 Рік тому

    What a dumpster fire

  • @petrbokotej6196
    @petrbokotej6196 Рік тому

    Royal clauns paid by people

  • @nigelgunson1025
    @nigelgunson1025 7 місяців тому

    An absolutely terrible interviewer.

  • @kiandrah8517
    @kiandrah8517 Рік тому +2

    EYE ROLL.

  • @Givemeliberty30
    @Givemeliberty30 Рік тому +2

    What if England keeps a monarchy but let the people vote on who that should be. Maybe not serve more than a 2 year term and then you're out and have to give someone else a turn.

    • @a.a9021
      @a.a9021 Рік тому +5

      What you are describing is not a monarchy. That would be a republic, which is what these guys are advocating for.

    • @Givemeliberty30
      @Givemeliberty30 Рік тому +3

      @@a.a9021 yes that was my point.

    • @a.a9021
      @a.a9021 Рік тому +3

      @@Givemeliberty30 Oh thank god

  • @lousyacrobat
    @lousyacrobat Рік тому +2

    what about andrew!!!!? pierce so obsessed w megan markle but andrew is actually a member of the royal family. also the queen paid off his accuser.

  • @robb1761
    @robb1761 Рік тому

    There privileged cartoons with no real power

  • @raymondbedborough8522
    @raymondbedborough8522 Рік тому +1

    How many people watch Piers because its car crash TV? Probably Britain's biggest bigot . Can someone do a Venn diagram with flat earthers. Apologies to flat earthers 😅

  • @prashantpawar00
    @prashantpawar00 Рік тому

    3.37 Absolute spot on. I had some respect for Piers before I watched this.

  • @michaelhoc9248
    @michaelhoc9248 Рік тому +9

    It's not just England but the whole commonwealth. Stop thinking of just yourselves it's for all of us. Good call Piers.

    • @basicallytouche4079
      @basicallytouche4079 Рік тому

      I live in NZ and no one here except my Grandmother respect the monarchy or have any positive views of it. Everyone I talk to (apart from my Grandmother of course) either can't stand the idea of a monarchy or just think its a little bit silly.

    • @jacon454
      @jacon454 9 місяців тому

      A lot of commonwealth don't like them, they represent colonisation

  • @ferngrant6234
    @ferngrant6234 Рік тому +1

    yadda yadda yadda. I am so tired of this debate

    • @avatarmufasa3628
      @avatarmufasa3628 Рік тому

      i mean, it can end once the royal family stop having positions of power

  • @papageno2696
    @papageno2696 Рік тому +3

    The guest on the left is the physical incarnation of the expression "smart Alec"

    • @peter0010
      @peter0010 Рік тому

      Just makes points about it being outdated. Valid points.

    • @jacon454
      @jacon454 9 місяців тому

      Smart Alex* 🤣

  • @johngrass5888
    @johngrass5888 Рік тому

    The problem is when these people were at school & college, no teacher explained to them of how in today's modern world the UK's Head of State became the people's backstop stopping MP's from taking over complete control over what is a very wonderful country that is tolerant, caring, loving & an endearing part of the Free World, no matter what politician's or newspapers say & bearing in mind how lazy, wasteful & unhelpful most of today's MP's are, it's a blooming good job the UK still has a Head of State. This backstop the people of UK have to keep their country free, combines with the truth that most folk in the UK are neither of the left nor of the right, but are of the Centre Ground. They know the left is crap & the right is crap. how many countries in the World have such a backstop, few & to most folk living on these Islands the Head of State in the UK is worth all the money in the World. Understand that & you'll come to understand the majority of people UK & what the UK has become & all that the people here need now is to turn the House of Lords into an elected representative chamber that can investigate anything they want to look into. This would be very healthy for democracy in the UK. We have the tools so stop shouting & get on with what is best for everyone in the UK.

  • @cababyboomerq6012
    @cababyboomerq6012 Рік тому +5

    I visited Britain in 2015, I wanted to see all the Royal stuff! All the guards, Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle. You name it, I wanted to see it. And I spent Plenty of money while there!

    • @merrickforrester5238
      @merrickforrester5238 Рік тому +17

      And those things will all still be there after we ditch the royal perverts.

    • @cababyboomerq6012
      @cababyboomerq6012 Рік тому

      @@merrickforrester5238 Really? Why would they? The Royal Guards? Guarding who it what? Sounds like allot of sour grapes to me. It’s history…. And you are the only one who has it like that. We come to see living history. You just don’t get it.

    • @Sebbir
      @Sebbir Рік тому +15

      @@cababyboomerq6012 Versailles is still an insanely popular tourist attraction longer after all the french royals are gone. It makes no difference to have a royal family hidden inside. You are not going to see them anyway. In fact, now it’s an even better attraction because you actually get to go inside instead of just standing outside

    • @cababyboomerq6012
      @cababyboomerq6012 Рік тому

      @@Sebbir I see your point. But it just isn’t the same. The English didn’t behead their Aristocracy. They survived, despite all the odds. History……. It is part of the draw for tourists in my opinion. It was for me. Although I did go to where Anne Boleyn got beheaded…. But again, history….. the Kings and Queens of England run through centuries of history. Who else has one like Britain? No one. Everyone knows they are just a figure head. They have no real power.

    • @avatarmufasa3628
      @avatarmufasa3628 Рік тому +3

      @@cababyboomerq6012 You could still hire those people to act as the appearance of what this would look like, but you dont need a royal family to justify that.
      Unless Im mistaken, you didnt actually see the royal family and the guards role would just be to protect those said locations, rather than locations + royal family.
      And again, all the royal stuff will cost us money. even if you specifically want to see that, i doubt thats the case for most people. And again, this still isnt really the point. The main point is that they shouldnt be an official office based purely on their birth, rather than their competency. Just because Elizabeth did good doesnt mean her successors will be, and in fact probably wont be.

  • @jakubvalenta7803
    @jakubvalenta7803 Рік тому

    Piers is right me and my slassmates were watching the funeral and coronation instead of school classes because those events are once in life time and you can not put pricetag on them. I am not even from GB and I feel offended by those morrons.
    Long live the king and whole Britain

    • @dapawap
      @dapawap Рік тому +2

      Maybe you should go back to school & lean grammar & spelling .It is my classmates and I!

    • @ConstantDerivative
      @ConstantDerivative 11 місяців тому +2

      this just seems like you want the monarchy to stay so you have a better chance of skipping classes

    • @jakubvalenta7803
      @jakubvalenta7803 11 місяців тому

      @@ConstantDerivative yeah totaly true :-)

    • @jacon454
      @jacon454 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@dapawaplean grammar? 🤣🤣 Oh the irony. But aside from that I agree with your point

  • @Azimkhan-rx1nj
    @Azimkhan-rx1nj Рік тому

    We need monarchy

    • @jacon454
      @jacon454 9 місяців тому +1

      Did you even watch the video?

  • @allykatharvey
    @allykatharvey Рік тому +1

    I agree in principle with the Republicans but they leave out the essential ingredient, which is that a monarch unites us all as a nation but politicians divide us. I didn’t like the gaudy Coronation. I hate all the virtue-signalling but I am a patriot and the strength of our unity matters more than the irritations about the the unfairness of monarchy.

    • @TheWunder
      @TheWunder Рік тому +1

      Clearly it doesn't unite royalists and anti monarchists.

    • @LTC366
      @LTC366 Рік тому

      Why didnt previous european monarchs not unite their people ?

  • @tracymcardle1236
    @tracymcardle1236 Рік тому +1

    Good for Piers, of course its worth the money

    • @peter0010
      @peter0010 Рік тому

      Nope

    • @jacon454
      @jacon454 9 місяців тому

      Not true, did you even watch the video?

  • @Manly2003
    @Manly2003 Рік тому +1

    Sunak? Johnson? Who care about them? By the way I am not a british and I love UK because of The Queen Elizabeth II.

    • @Manly2003
      @Manly2003 Рік тому

      @@KarmaGoodDeeds her legacy is forever alive

  • @Tabaluca911
    @Tabaluca911 Рік тому

    Piers is really the best guy to be running a talk show

  • @Manly2003
    @Manly2003 Рік тому

    Royal Family is identity of UK, otherwise sorry yo say, UK is no differences with Singapore, Malaysia South Africa, Iran, who care about them? British Royal is a very strong identity

  • @florencehildebrand8823
    @florencehildebrand8823 Рік тому +4

    We need a little bit of fantasy ❤

    • @thebillryan
      @thebillryan Рік тому +3

      It's their fantasy. You don't get to live in it.

    • @peter0010
      @peter0010 Рік тому

      That's what a film is there for. This little brand called Disney makes tons of the things about Kings, Queens, Princesses etc.

    • @jacon454
      @jacon454 9 місяців тому

      But we shouldn't have our taxes on fantasy

  • @salvatoredinunzio4137
    @salvatoredinunzio4137 Рік тому +4

    The royals family is represented the history of the English monarchy and its commonwealth in England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 and the royal family represents the history of the British country…. The royal family is a institution that has always stood for English heritage…. The prime minister’s office charges every election 🗳️ and the royal family remains the same. Shame on those young liberals who don’t understand how great the system of British system it is…. Those young people who’s liberal views are nauseous and sick…. Incredible how much they don’t know about their country.
    God’s Save the King 👑

    • @avatarmufasa3628
      @avatarmufasa3628 Рік тому +2

      The British did a lot of things in the past (a lot of them not good). Those ideas more often than not belong in a museum.
      But indeed its nice to know that you support an indiviual who can literally get away with murder. Their page online says they promise not to, but I could also promise not to murder. The point is, if I actually did murder someone, I would be sent to prison. With Charles, this isnt the case, hes just allowed to kill people if he wants to.
      Also, I dont agree with the king/queen having more influence over the prime minster, with regular meetings.
      I support democracy. And being a monarchist essentially denies you of fully supporting this system.
      If the king/queens want to be celebrities, then fine. But make them regular private citizens that have to follow the same rules as the rest of us mortals, with no additionals legal powers/benefits.

  • @cyrusvaldes5001
    @cyrusvaldes5001 Рік тому +5

    LEAVE THE ROYAL FAMILY ALONE

    • @jacon454
      @jacon454 9 місяців тому +1

      They should leave our taxes alone

  • @nerdbane9376
    @nerdbane9376 Рік тому +2

    The monarchy is one of the very few Great things GB has left.
    It's the main reason one day I'll go to GB.
    From Aus.

    • @childfreegamer8840
      @childfreegamer8840 Рік тому +1

      If you think that's the best we have then you know nothing about us.

    • @nerdbane9376
      @nerdbane9376 Рік тому

      @@childfreegamer8840 Maybe I should have said 'special' or something to that effect. To each their own.

  • @nioengland
    @nioengland Рік тому +2

    it's always the ugly ones.. ugly on the outside means ugly on the inside

  • @NoWindNoSunNoPower
    @NoWindNoSunNoPower Рік тому +1

    Hilarious! Graham Smith is clueless and Alex J. O’Connor is just plain thick.

    • @jacon454
      @jacon454 9 місяців тому +1

      You mean piers Morgan is thick

  • @ErikWw
    @ErikWw 6 місяців тому

    The shape shifting lizards most be defended at all cost!

  • @leejentaylor6195
    @leejentaylor6195 Рік тому +1

    schwab's minions all at work in the comments I see...he did hire 1000s of them to sway opinion - his harry andmeghan attempt failed hey

    • @Oliver-b7j
      @Oliver-b7j Рік тому +1

      Your king is literally a WEF affiliate