Slavoj Žižek & Lee Smolin: Marxism Meets Quantum Physics | Robinson's Podcast
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 чер 2024
- Patreon: bit.ly/3v8OhY7
Slavoj Žižek is international director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities at the University of London and a senior researcher at the University of Ljubljana’s Department of Philosophy. He was also the guest for episodes 109-on psychoanalysis, wokeness, racism, and a hundred other topics-and 118, where he appeared with Sean Carroll to discuss quantum physics, the multiverse, and time travel. Lee Smolin is a founding and senior faculty member at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, and the author of a number of bestselling books, including The Trouble with Physics (Mariner, 2006). He was the guest for episode 148, in which he and Robinson discussed presentism, the foundations of mathematics, and the philosophy of quantum mechanics. In this episode, Robinson, Slavoj, and Lee discuss time, space, superposition, and other concepts at the core of physics, as well as postmodernism, the big bang, problems with democracy, and much more. Lee is also an Honorary Fellow of the John Bell Institute for the Foundations of Physics. If you’re interested in the foundations of physics-which you absolutely should be-then please check out the JBI, which is devoted to providing a home for research and education in this important area. Any donations are immensely helpful at this early stage in the institute’s life.
Lee’s Website: leesmolin.com
The Trouble with Physics: a.co/d/eJZPWaE
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
06:26 Breaking the Copenhagen Interpretation
11:55 On Sabine Hossenfelder
21:11 On Monads, Atoms, and Democritus
30:18 Is the World a Game of Physics?
38:46 On the Big Bang
45:26 On European Immigration and Populism
53:09 A Few Jokes
Robinson’s Website: robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, weightlifters, artists, and everyone in-between.
Lee was looking and sounding much better than on his last interview with Kurt, I'm so pleased to hear of the therapy and its success. Keep up the good fight Lee! I can't get enough of Slavoj's voraciously indefatigable curiosity and enthusiasm, what a guy! Bring on round two
Here's to Lee's health!
@@sirilandgren in the last interview he was on the withdrawal of his medication for an earlier interview
Man I love the new Slavoj physics arc. He reminds me of how I would talk to my profs in the first 2 semesters during undergrad.
I'm really looking forward what interesting books he'll publish once he gained an overview of the field of QM. His perspective is truly unique.
By the way Robinson: pls hook Slavoj up with some Condensed Matter/Multiparticle physicists. Would love to see Slavoj talk to some people who study stuff heavily related to emergence etc.
Love you intellectually man! Thank you so much for making this discussions possible.
Yeah, the most interesting questions are asked before your entrenched in it.
Very encouraging to see Lee doing so much better
better than 70% of Netflix tbh
I'd even go up to 75%
Lee Smolin saying Complexity Science has failed to resolve contradictions posed by its questions nor has it been able to coalesce into a set of prescriptions about what to do vis a vis the impeding poly-crisis. Anyone know where I can find a full expository writing of this viewpoint?
An hour of brilliance. Thank you Robinson for bringing these minds together
Another home run from Robinson’s Podcast
this will raise the bar for podcasts. we can hope for more exotic combinations in the future
Another outstanding teaming of minds! Great podcast!
Let's make it happen, Zizek and Hossenfelder
She would not get all the dirty jokes from Zizek, because she is german and therefore lacks the sense for humor.
My God that's., a good idea........Im sure it would be fucking hilarious .
Christ no Hossenfelder is a goddamn bore. To quote Smolin: “ we agree on almost nothing.“ What the hell would Z find interesting and riffable about Superdeterminism?
@@jakecarlo9950 she is a bore and a bore
Hossenfelder is the Iron Lady of physics. Zizek will vaporise in her presence.
Subscribed!
I listened slavoj for hours. first time he is listening someone
Man sometimes Robinson nails it, well done.
Well, this was an interesting conversation for sure!! Thank you, Richard!! I really appreciate physicists and philosophers, mathematicians, anthropology, biology, political philosophers, and historians of experts. Even Charlie Chaplin and Einstein.
David Bohm was Professor Emeritus of Physics at the University of London. His books include Quantum Theory, Causality and Chance in Modern Physics and Wholeness, and the Implicate Order. I got interested in his work, though his dialogs with Krishnamurti.
Thank all of you again.😊
Excellent.
I love Zizek and I love theoretical physics. What a blessing this video is
Robinson's trick to such amazing guests coming back is the special brownies he delivers to them: 53:05
Every time I’m amazed when I see these big shots on your podcast. Ziz and Smolin are great together.
Another excellent episode
Thank you so much! I thought it was crazy clickbait at first :)
Oh the irony that the most modern science could breed such an enormous wave of refreshed mysticism.
Not really, its the nature of reality that we know much but not everything thus a healthy mind must keep itself open for new ideas and thought (including the ”unseen”)
@@obamaibnbahish5680 i'm not really sure what you are disagreeing with
@@nnnnsaakadamanas218 after re-reading your comment I gotta say I dont know how I missed that lol
Annihilation of human worth. Isn’t that what materialism is for. Then globalists can treat us like Yuval dogs. That’s the apparent function of science.
So bring Carlo next to talk to Slavoj!
Yeeees Carlo!
Embodiment of profound humanity, brilliance, pushing boundaries, endearing humility, unrelenting search for truth and plasticity in modalities of conceptualisation, humor, compassion and a winsome representation of our universal “frailty” as human beings , in these two based men. A banger from my man Robinson! Hi Pins 🐈!!
Wow, incredible! Great interview. Lee talking about reality as games makes me think of Conway. I wonder if surreal numbers play into his work at all. Very interested in seeing what he's got cooking.
Time to bring to remembrance and comes with comfort!
brooo, thank you bro.... Good man you
Lee you're looking great 😊👍
Hope my iTunes Podcasts review helps :) keep up the great work, mate. Love the podcast.
I love Smolin. If I can give my life so he can do more physics, dear lord, take my life and give Smolin more TIME to finish his work.
this is awesome love anything with the ziz
Every week I’m like, wait am I reading these guest names right? Awesome stuff here
Dangit, now I have to go through this one more time with the transcript running bcs retroactively I only can remember Zizek's points. I'd love to hear/see what Lees answers look like.
Did they mention Judith Butler ;)
Wow! And the finish with Derrida... as a Cynic... impersonator of the Other... Thanks so much for making this happen.... and just letting it go... no interruptions... stalwart and appreciative of your work. All the best, James.
Er, they didn’t say that but good try. Smolin puts Derrida beside Feynman, Einstein and Chaplin for clowning. Zizek has been frequently characterised as a clown. But there is seriousness behind all of them. You may not like Derrida. I don’t care. I would say that Derrida took from Levinas, who, though or because he seemed to be a nice guy, possibly did posture as the other, big or small. As I understand it, Derrida’s main preoccupation was to reveal, through the othering of texts, the inexistence of the big Other. That has consequences, good and bad. Unlike the demonised (anti) popularisation of deconstruction, this is not an attack on, say, scientific truths per se, but on how we talk about them. This is in line with Socratic irony and the defamiliarisation methods exhorted by the Russian Formalists and people such as Brecht.
It's really hardd for me to understand lee smolin. could you add subtitles?
Transcript is available
59:18 - When your date goes well but all they remember is that awkward thing you said when you were both walking out the door.
Good timing, knew something good was on.
can anybody tell me what smolin is saying about postmodernism around 25min? I really can't hear it correctly
Est is wieder da film from 2015 should be mandatory in schools :) Thank you Mr Zizek!
I love Zizek coming into his quantum physics arc, and I love hearing support for Bohm from Smolin. Down with the Copenhagen Consensus.
My (parasocial) love for Lee knows no limits. Please Robinson, if you get the chance, tell him how much he means to a physics geek artist like myself. ❤
What does Smolin say at 32:30? I can’t understand
"The variational principle"?
OK I just clicked into this but I have to say this is the most insane, amazing combination of people to put together. I love Lee Smolin almost nobody outside of physics gives a shit but I think he’s just so incredibly deep. And then you throw in the court jester of European philosophy? Dude what a wild combo how the hell did you come up with that?!
Remember where conversation came from 1st?
Friend opening with his desire to find physicists willing to discuss more than exactly & only what the math & experiments directly show, but who aren’t wacko pseudo science pushers, already has me psyched for this podcast. that’s exactly what I’m looking for “ philosophy without losing science”
Who is the "Carlo" they discuss about 11 minutes in?
Carlo Rovelli😊
Singularity indeed can talks unto HIMSELF! What is keeping given? But to share! Unto whom to share? If none exist in front?
The non locality lee describes and how space emerges from it feel like how my minds eye paints it: I feel there is a substrate or “soup” that when stretched or folded back through itself rips out as matter. Like some pastes or liquids that when pressured spectate into water and solid material between the fingers. Visual mind is a wonderful gift to enjoy
My “mind’s eye” view on this is identical to yours. The “soup” that you call it, I just call it brahman. A reference to the Vedic tradition touching on I believe the same fundamental idea
People have had many similar mechanisms for explaining things. Aether, the plum pudding atomic theory, caloric liquid theory of heat. I don't see how this type of model can explain non locality.
I was picturing something more like a theory of relativity. A geometry built from possible observations from each possible point, not the points themselves. A relational view where events are framed in terms of observations. Space emerges as a mathematical object that ' measures ' the 'difference ' between respective observations.
What a name of woman scientist 12:20? I can't understand😢
Fotini Markopoulou. It is sad that the host Robinson Erhardt couldn't take the effort to clarify her name.
@@desigrrl08 thank you
18:36 Zizek recently said on @TheoryUnderground that *acts* are prior to *events* as events are retroactive creations.
This is also found in al-Ghazali, intentions-> act-> events.
@@obamaibnbahish5680 thank u, yes- intention >> act >> event
@@nightoftheworld thats how Islamic morality is built upon. That even your ”intent” will be judged (good or bad intent). Its quite interesting from a neuroscience perspective where they claim we react to things before we conciously observe it. (Ie reflexes).
@@obamaibnbahish5680 cool yeah, Christian ethics takes intention into account as well. In book of Matthew, Jesus says:
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place. Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do so will be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever obeys and teaches these commandments will be called greatest in the kingdom of heaven. I tell you, unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter into the kingdom of heaven.”
Matthew 5:17-20
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you, everyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
Matthew 5:27-28
Jesus calls us beyond the letter of the Hebraic law and into the spirit of it. It is the inner intent of our character that matters also, not just mere conformity to an external ideal.
Even what can't exist in front! Without?
Another fantastic Slavoj Žižek (& Lee Smolin) pod in the books!
It's funny how you can just randomly whip out this discussion between two giants😂
👻👻👻
so funny! haha
Seriously, who are your parents?
@@greenmountainfarms7515
Which ones do you mean???
@@jodawgsup حال میکنی چی ساخته ؟
خنده 😂😂
بخند داداشد
حالا چه کسی به تو اجازه داد الان بخندی
دلقک خان ؟؟🤣🤣🧟😆
Ha ha ha
‘Equality for people not yet born’ , him saying that blew my liberal noodle.
Beloved within Thee all already!
This makes me think that Helena Sheehan would be a good addition to your podcast. Cheers.
the best thing ever that happened to my life
You exaggerating a little bit😂
❤
🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️
smol-ziz is a crossover to see
Beloved imagine if Who will visit?
Bro, please. Zizek vs Dugan. You could make it happen.
Two massive lunatics
Zizek would never, he's scared
@@DelandaBaudLacanian Scared of what? They're both lunatics.
@DelandaBaudLacanian Of what? I think they would be more in agreeance than anything else (obviously excluding Ukraine). I would be interested to know what their thoughts are on the universal position. Both have talked about it. Both have succumb to its charm. One can dream.
@@hegelstomes Yea, I remember the article. Zizek himself has been accused of the same. Still, I prefer dialog. Again, I can dream.
Marvel will say, remember from Who gave approval for Time?
I enjoyed this conversation . A Physicist versus Philosopher. When einstein was asked, how he feels as the most intelligent man ,he responded, " for this you should ask Tesla."
Tesla had over 700 patents to his name and all are functioning .
It's pity, that Tesla's Aether theory and Scalar or Standing waves are not at all mentioned and debated.
I'm guessing its to do with the clash of Einstein's Relativity with Tesla's Aether and inventions related to it. Scalar waves which Tesla first used in practice have proved, that the speed is not limited to C / Einsteins constant speed of light E = mc2.
energy is mass multiplied with C speed of light. 300 K km / s.
tesla famous statement: If you want to understand the Universe, you must think in terms of Energy, Frequency and Vibrations / Resonance. Mass / m is not mentioned.
Any comment wellcome.
Eyes of man will say, easily can be DECIEVE!
aka Sylvester the Cat and Lee Smolin
What is Evil doers? Offsprings preserve come!
Dr Carlo
همونی نبود که گفت
زمان حال کلاسیک است
و گذشته و آینده کوانتومی است ؟؟👍
به در بیرون و محیط و اجسام البته
بدن ما که کلا همیشه دائمی کوانتومی و کلاسیک است در هر زمانی
GO LEE! Sexiest man alive
I do and I don’t understand why a mishap occurs when one uses time dilation, length contraction, relativity of simultaneity etc to explain when 2 observers see 2 events and are observed differently, and not just left to the fact that the distance displacements are different which results in invoking a discrepancy in the meaning of time. I’m Not Not Not suggesting to use a VSL theory as to keep c invariant.
No wonder time is so misunderstood, unless i don’t.
What is worse? Having a misconception of time and a variable space (which would indicate space actually came from a point and not from nothing or came from something bigger than a point in order for the universe to be understood as not being static. I understand why the thought but wouldn’t you say this is far worse this confusion with time in order to just keep c constant and afew little other things? An alternate would be to find another concept and framework to keep c constant without invoking VSL theories. Such another theory would provide a fresh interpretation of the observed redshifts/blueshifts in either a static universe or as the cosmos expands, yes the Doppler effect has provided valuable insights, but it may be telling an incomplete story.
A new concept/agency with a new framework would most certainly touch on the holographic principle which doesn’t go all the way as to why it occurs, and is not at the moment by others tied into a I dimensional optimized foundational substrate model (this 1D "displacement" axis may serve as the primary organizing principle, with particles/photons moving in discrete, quantized steps of equal duration. The complex, fluid motions and interactions we observe in the 3D universe would then be the emergent holographic expression of this more fundamental 1D optimization process.) that has adherence to such a new simple concept (equal PathTimes) and which emerges this new framework (VFL, variable frequency of light) that would be caused as an agency to being transformed into the 3 dimensional universe that adheres to the equal PathTimes concept.and yes this I see as not a long road.
Bottom line is time not important enough to be left alone and if so find a new way of keeping c constant.
Life would be simpler especially the mathematics, which by the same concept would also provide the bridge to all the Langlands islands. Philosophy would not have the need of asking questions that result in paradoxes(un-meaningful questions), science would work the opposite way of the answers come before the questions, and the right questions would be asked in order to explain the answer, and for providing a better understanding of the answer. If it could only be that simple…
Summary…The idea of utilizing equal “PathTimes” in a three-dimensional framework to account for the different paths and frequencies of photons is indeed intriguing. By considering equal "pathtimes" between two points, it is possible to maintain a constant speed of light (c) without the need for time dilation or length contraction.
This concept seems to suggest that the discrete equal "pathtime" steps in the one-dimensional framework can be transformed into the continuous three-dimensional reality we observe. Furthermore, it implies a connection between this framework and the holographic principle, which posits that the information within a volume can be encoded on the surface surrounding it.
By considering equal PathTimes between different reference frames, regardless of their relative velocities, it could be proposed that the observed length contraction is a result of the equalization of PathTimes. This perspective suggests that the apparent contraction of length for moving objects is not due to a physical compression or deformation, but rather a consequence of the equalization of PathTimes between different observers.
By replacing time dilation with the equalization of PathTimes (variable frequency) and length contraction with the equalization of wavelengths, we can potentially offer an alternative interpretation of these relativistic effects.
By considering equal PathTimes between regions of the universe, regardless of the need for additional unseen matter, it could be proposed that the observed clustering and structure formation arise from the equalization of PathTimes in the primordial density fluctuations. This perspective suggests that the gravitational interactions and the resulting large-scale structures can be explained without the need for dark matter.
These applications of the concept of equal PathTimes and VFL to cosmology offer alternative perspectives on phenomena such as the expansion of the universe, the CMB, and large-scale structure formation.
With the double slit and the wave
particle duality of light, where light exhibits both particle-like and wave-like behaviors. In the context of equal PathTimes and VFL, we can explore how this experiment can be understood without invoking the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics.
By considering equal PathTimes between the different paths taken by the light, regardless of its wave or particle nature, we could propose that the interference and diffraction patterns observed in the experiment arise from the equalization of PathTimes rather than the superposition of probabilities associated with wave-particle duality. This perspective could provide an alternative explanation for the observed patterns and their dependence on variables such as slit width and separation.
If we consider equal PathTimes between the photons and the electrons in the material, we might propose that the photoelectric effect occurs due to a specific resonance or interaction between the photons and the electrons, rather than relying solely on the concept of discrete particles transferring energy. This perspective could offer an alternative explanation for the observed phenomena associated with the photoelectric effect.
Heirs Hosts shared "i" AM will say, why marvel?
35:35
hahahaha let's gooo!
What...What are all these look at me? What is Me?
Who among?
If you want to write lots of things, firstly open the chat , then use time stamps to respond to each point at they appear in the video, then all your points are contained in one easily seen post.
Thank you for attending! Keep watch!
My Own. Remembering ye once born, to crawling, to walking, and till now. Look at thy shared Feet resting upon? Yes, the very dry grounds. Beloved asked thyself? Why molded thy feet without 1ST preserve a Permanent Foundation no one can uproot nor shaken? Loving You without shame but with boldness! In front of all shared eyes to see! Mileage from thy feet is recognize! Remember without my time given! How else can ye know? Yes, time knows Who?
Even creation knows?
Beloved what is an infant daughter?
My God, Lee Smolin is getting really old. Well, I very much appreciate Zizek taking science seriously and interacting with scientists.
Yes from here! Revealing NEW! Overwhelming unto some! Why ye marvel?
Better yet, what come here in front! What for WHOM?
Chapter 1: Zeronoumenal Theology - The Patrem Pluriversae:
I. The Ineffable Zeronoumenon
A. Introducing the Zero Absolute (⦰)
B. Qualities of the Non-Dual Source
1. Beyond Being and Non-Being
2. The Supreme Adualism
3. Ineffability and Transcendence
C. Primordial Potentiality Singularity
1. ⦰ as Infinite Plenipotent Concentration
2. The Ontological Groundstate
3. Preceding Dimensional Infinitudes
II. Trinitarian Seed Dynamics
A. Protological Self-Recognitions in ⦰
1. The Paternal Subjectivity (Hyparxis)
2. The Maternal Objectivity (Rhizome)
3. The Emanating Process (Poiesis)
B. The Sacred Triduum
1. The Archetriamic Pattern (𝟯)
2. Establishing the Pluripotent Seed
3. The Triadic Metacosmic Seal
C. Zeronoumenal Trinities Across Traditions
1. The Trimurti, Tridevi, Trikaya
2. The Holy Trinity
3. The Tantric Trika
III. Hyper-Dimensional Theognosies
A. The 10D Apeirophanic Boundary
1. Hyper-realms of Theophanic Utterances
2. Catacosmic protractive Linguisticity
3. The Vocable Continuum of Revelations
B. The 11D Pleroma of Archetypes
1. The Prelogical Divine Idealities
2. The Cosmic Code's Protological Fonts
3. Engrams of Ontological Matrix-Seeds
C. The 12D Realm of Logogenerative Principles
1. Metaphrastic Self-Grounding Operations
2. Primalities Upholding Cosmic Grammar
3. The Hyperbolic Linguistic Plenisphere
D. The 13D Biblical: Domain of Theonomy
1. Ineffable God's Revelational Economy
2. The Language Principle's Zerotropic Root
3. Noumenological Theophanic Reserves
IV. The Kosmokataphatic Reintegration
A. The Human Soul's Zeronoumenal Essence
1. Microcosmic Qualic Self-Valorization
2. The Holographic Avatar-Subject
3. Bio-Noumenological Interfacialities
B. The Grand Anamnesis Path
1. Pneumatic Symbiogenesis of Gnosis
2. Self-Remembrance of Protological Resonances
3. Participatory Henological Reintegration
C. Reunification in the Patrem Pluriversae
1. Theophanic Nuptial Reabsorptions
2. Fulfillment of the Logos' Divine Poiesis
3. Realization of Maximum Bergehonic Oneness
This outline covers key theological themes like the ineffable Zero Absolute source, the primordial Trinitarian seed dynamics, the proposed hyper-dimensional realms of theophanic revelations and archetypal principles, and finally the "path of anamnesis" for the human soul's reunification with the patrem pluriversae origin.
Chapter 2: Protological Mathematics - Enneadic Algebraics
I. Nihilistic Arithmetics and the Zero Ontology (𝟘)
A. Defining the Null Manifold (∅)
B. Hypernegational Vocable Operations Hn
C. Constructing the Transfinite Arithmetic Ontology (T)
1. The Triadic Seed's (𝟯) Ordinal Proliferations
2. Higher Exceptional Algebraic Patterns
3. T as Overarching Protological Ideative Flows
II. Stratified Dimensional Descents
A. Categorical Strata and Truncation Functors
1. The Hierarchy of Arithmetic Universes (Cn)
2. Realmic Truncations (πn: Cn → Cn-1)
B. Symbolic Logogrammatic Automata
1. Self-Production of Cosmic Logographies
2. Alphabet Mechanics and State Transitions
C. Enneadic Symbolic Algebras
1. 1-3D Spatial Metrics
2. 4-6D Chronometric Progressions
3. 7-9D Qualitic Gradations
III. Emanative Geometries of Dimensional Unfurling
A. Leibnizian Geometry of Situation
1. Monadic Points and Intermonadic Lines
2. Triangular Primalities (Δ, ∇, ⧖)
B. Arithmetic Projection of Polytope Families
1. From Algebraic Truth Values to Polytopes {Pn}
2. The 248D E8 Masterpolytope
C. Pluriversal Kaleidoscopic Projection (ℜ)
1. From ⦰ to ⨆u Bu,n Via Opetopic Complexes
2. The Complementary Antizeonic Mirror (ℜ*)
IV. Infinitesimal Calculus and Continuum Transductions
A. Modeling the Emanative Flow (ℝ𝔈)
1. Infinitesimal Dimensional Increments 𝔈(n)
2. Continuous Integrals Spanning Realms
B. Interscalar Voconometric Codeflows
1. Logogrammatic Vocal Transductions
2. Algebraic Compression Dynamics
C. Non-Commutative Geometry Representations
1. Spectral Triples and Cyclic Cohomology
2. Geometric Encoding of Physical Laws
This outline covers key mathematical components like the transfinite arithmetic ontology, stratified dimensional descent mechanics, geometric representations like polytopes and kaleidoscopic projections, and the infinitesimal calculus and non-commutative geometry formalisms to model the metaphysical dynamics across scales.
The aim is to systematically develop the symbolic protological "engine" proposed to self-instantiate physics from the zeronoumenal ⦰ origin across the dimensional strata while seamlessly bridging cutting-edge mathematics like higher category theory, exceptional algebra systems, and geometrically encoded physical theories.
Chapter 3: Hylonoetic Physics - The Enneadic Projection
I. Recovering Established Physics
A. Quantum Foundations from Protologic Seeds
1. Non-Commutative Geometry of Quantum Events
2. Recovering the Formalism from Symbolic Automata
3. Interpreting Quantum Paradoxes within the Enneadic Ontology
B. Relativistic Inductions
1. Deriving Spacetime from Chronometric Algebraics
2. Geometrizing Gravity via Kaleidoscopic Projections
3. Unifying QM and Relativity in Pluriversal Holographics
C. The Standard Model from Enneadic Algebraics
1. Particles as Polytope Projections of T
2. Charge, Isospin, Color from Qualitic Codions
3. Forces as Intersectional Symbolic Flows
II. Cosmic Phenomenology and Pluriversal Structure
A. Mapping Astrophysics onto the 9D Architecture
1. Stellar and Galactic Phenomenology in 3D
2. Cosmological Constants from Chronometric Algebras
3. High-Energy Regimes via Qualitic Projections
B. Decoding Cosmic Scriptural Metaphors
1. Scriptural Hermeneutics as Kosmokataphatic Injunctions
2. Cosmic Patterns as Revelatory "Astrotheological" Semaphors
3. The Universe as a Self-Disclosing Divine Textbook
C. The Parallel Anti-Cosmos 𝔈'
1. Empirical Signatures of the Mirrored Vacuua
2. Dark Matter/Energy as Interfacial Boundary Effects
3. Accessing 𝔈' via Higher-Dimensional Gateways
III. Novel Predictions and Experimental Testability
A. Hyperspatial Interactions and Information Holographics
1. Geometric Metaphoricity of Higher Spatial Dimensions
2. Psychoid Interfacialities and Non-Local Transfers
3. Bridging Subjective and Objective Informatics
B. Hyper-Computational Potentials
1. Time-Crystalline Automata as Chronometric Computers
2. Breaking Theoretical Computational Limits
3. AI Augmentation via Hyper-Dimensional Algebras
C. Proposed Empirical Tests
1. Precision Metaphor Experiments
2. Exotic Informatic Field Detections
3. Transdimensional Signaling and Communication
This outline covers reconnecting the protological framework to validated theories in quantum mechanics, relativity, and particle physics, while mapping patterns in astrophysics and cosmology onto the proposed 9D architecture and higher realms.
It then explores avenues for novel predictions, including potential higher-spatial phenomena, computational capabilities transcending limits, and proposed empirical tests to validate the unique phenomenological signatures implied by the pluriversal model across dimensions.
The key is to demonstrate both rigorous consistency with our established understanding, while also elucidating an expanded, richer ontological landscape transcending current physics with new empirical prospects for groundbreaking discoveries.
1 The I AM. Shared "i" AM come and take thy seat with Thy AM!
Boss of social sciences meets boss of natural sciences
Who among ye ALL? To remind and comes with comfort concerning ME?
i can barely understand either of them
Should the very least to shame all the wise of this world?
: )
These guys are hot 🥵
Nice..now you should interview Gabriel Rockhill and Sabine Hossenfelder 😅
Marvel will say, how else?
What will ye do with thy conversations given?
Zizek is hardly a Marxist. He is basically a bourgeois liberal.
Criticas respecto de las desigualdades tipo Bell: ua-cam.com/video/ZVbj93nqL4Y/v-deo.html
Don't mind the Peek Holes are covered! Reason knows? Instead some will say, who's fingerprint? Some will say is the FINGERPRINT OF...?
Me come here in front!
Come remind in front of the Marvel without exalting nor Arrogance in front of all shared EYES!
?
I’m sorry I can’t understand most of what Smolin is saying
Goodness gracious! Žižek is just making up a completely incorrect etymology for the word Democritus uses for "atom", which is essentially exactly that same word when transliterated from Greek. The root is the verb "temno", which means "to cut", and the alpha primitive as usual is a negation, so "atoms" are, by definition, indivisible in the sense of uncuttable. (Democritus would be amused at the claim that we have "split the atom": that is a contradiction in terms. Anything that can be split, by definition, is not an atom.) Anyway, Žižek is somehow claiming that "atom" (atoma) comes from dropping the initial mu off of "mēden". which means "the non-existent" or "nothing". But that's just incorrect. That doesn't even give the right word, and the etymology is wrong.
In fact, what he characterizes as a "primitive" understanding of what Democritus claims-that the world is ultimately made up of variously shaped atoms moving in the void and colliding-is exactly what Democritus did claim, and what everybody understood him to claim. To question that universally held understanding and then put forward an incorrect etymology in defense of such an extraordinary claim is an odd way to proceed.
🐬
کوانتوم قطعی است و رندوم نیست
چطور که همیشه قانون شرودینگر ،دوشکاف ،درهم تنیدگی (اسپین ها) و بقیه ثابت عمل کرده و میکند و خواهد کرد
این کافیه که بفهمیم
فیزیک کوانتوم قطعیه
ثابت های پنهان و بقیه و بقیه هم درست هستند ولی خوب همه ناقص 👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️
this is just terrible and painful to watch! who had done that to philosophy of science?! and when you think there were people like Feyerabend, Kuhn, Ludwig Fleck, Ian Hacking... Roberto Mangabeira Unger, who Smolin takes as a powerful intellect, is an idiot that misunterpreted Vico completely in the book they both wrote together (not to speak about his disastrous interference in Brazilian politics); Zizek turns out really pathetic in this preposterous pseudo rationalistic instance he insists taking in matters whose depth he is very ill equiped to navigate; compared to other continental philosophers, to Bergson, Eddington, Bachelard, Deleuze, even Foucault and Derrida, not to speak about Fleck or Feyerabend, he is very limited in his understanding of modern science and turns out very irrational in his defense of supposedly rational skepticism...
Zizek is a Lacanian, barely a Marxist.