5 CRITERIA for a CALIPH + Political Theory in Early Islam
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 кві 2024
- Join our Annual Program package (Subscription $10) and discover two of the most dynamic centuries within Muslim History, through regular (bi-weekly ) installments in our exclusive series:
(1) The Umayyad Kingdom | A Study of Islam's First Dynasty
(2) Shadow History | A Review of the Muslim World in the 20th Century
➤ Find out more about the Courses & Programs www.historyun.com/
𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐌 𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘𝐔𝐍
➤ Courses & Programs www.historyun.com/
➤ Documentaries on Patreon / historyun
➤ Book Club on Telegram t.me/AdabBookClub
➤ Instant Notifications on Whattapp tinyurl.com/HistoryunWA
➤ Follow us on TwitterX / historyuntweets
➤ Follow us on TikTok tiktok.com/@Historyun
___________________________________
#Historyun #IlmFilm #ShadowHistory #IslamicHistory #History #MuslimHistory 'UmayyadKingdom
𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐌 𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘𝐔𝐍
Unlock 200 years of Islamic History with our dual-package annual program for only $10.
➤ +24 hours of exclusive content in our growing video library (past lessons)
➤ Regular live and interactive seminars hosted every 2 weeks
➤ Join a global community of Islamic History students and enthusiasts
➤ Access to our exclusive App and Learning Platform
Find out more about the courses and register to unlock over +24 hours of exclusive content and resources and register for only $10 (monthly subscriptions)
➤ Official Website: www.historyun.com
➤ Register on Patreon: tinyurl.com/38neehx4
Hello everyone from Alabama; i am a non-muslim and have great respect for many Muslims around the world, Blessed Be.
thank you from the u.k.
Read Quran brother and listen to commentaries of the verses, also listen to lectures of Shia scholars, you will see God never left us alone without guidance as we have infallible imams and their examples their books and guidance and rulling ETCETC.
Oh sorry man, lol, I thought u needed help and tips about Islam. I Apologies. And may God bless u and ur loved ones
I can safely say that almost all of the Arab dictators miss the 2 most important factors mentioned in the video:
- they’re incompetent
- they ain’t trust worthy
Brother, I appreciate your knowledge and time you put in your research
FULL HAIDTH : You should obey your leader even if he is habashi but on the condition that he calls you towards ALLAH and His Rasool.
YESS
Why does it even need to be stated what they are? Clearly there’s an issue there? Or they were ill received?
@@JayKahns it clearly to stay away from racism
@@JayKahns the Abyssinians in recent history had marched to destroy the Kaabah, so there was tension between them and the Arabs.
This was telling them to obey the leader regardless of race as long as they call towards Allah.
Pretty racist
Rebellion against unjust rulers is allowed there is no restriction against it
Shaikh Al-Islām Abu ʿUthmān Ismāʿeel As-Sābooni (died 449H) stated: “Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah do not hold that it is permissible to revolt against them (the rulers) even if they see from them abandoning justice and replacing it with tyranny and injury…” He ended his treatise with, “These sentences which I have affirmed in this chapter were the Creed of all of them (i.e. the scholars of Ahlus-Sunnah). None of them differed regarding it with each other. Rather, they agreed by ijmāʿ with it all.” (See ʿAqīdatus-Salaf As-hābul-Hadeeth, p. 32)
@@cOnfidentialcOrponly paid imams at the time abolished rebellion against unjust tyrannical leaders. Allah makes it clear with the story of pharaoh.
If you don’t rebel you will never create the kingdom of heavens on earth
@@cOnfidentialcOrp there is no ijmaa
There are some revivalist movements that have delved very deep into this discussion alhamdulillah and I think its much needed. A revival is taking place and understanding these key discussion is vital for this ummah to move forward. Living within the ststus quo has only made things worse. We must broaden our thining as to what gave this ummah 'izzah (honour).
Keep posting clips like these brother, maybe in the form of UA-cam shorts so the word can spread.
It's of no use unless people don't do justice to Ahlul Bayt Alaihisalam.
@@servantofthemerciful3511 Of course it's of use dear brother/sister. We have to break out of that mindset. The only time the ummah was united was under an islamic leadership and we need to recognise that and move on.
Very appreciated
Please do a video on the ibadis!!!
As an African Muslim he should do that first about ibadis but kharidjis would be way better but he is not that deep
JazakAllah kheir. Which series/module was this clip taken from?
This is from the Umayyad Kingdom, unit U02 (3 hours)
Barakallahu Feekum
Can you release a longer version of this video where u mention the Shia school and the kharijite school
Is there full videos in you tube?
I read that a correct traslation should be that his 'hair is like dried raisin' because it is refering to that which is attached to the head.
Please talk about the Ibadis and the history of Ahlu haqq wa istiqama
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Can you make a video on the Qureshi part?
Do you have the full video of this
These are brief extracts from the annual program available via our website www.historyun.com
Live sessions are held every fortnight (3 hours each) with currently over 24 hours of on-demand video content from past lectures.
Who are the xabash exactly ? Is it just the Christian abysinnians or does it include Cushitic nations like Somalis and afar?
The Habesha are the Tigray, Amharic and Oromo peoples
No Somalis AND AFAR are not HABESHa the word HABESHA literally means mixed people Somalis and anfars were known as belatal Berber from Berbera
@@Sa7biUK I am sorry to break it to you but oromo are not HABESHa they are Cushitic and are a recent arrival there ancestors home is from lake tana and only moved into middle of Ethiopia in the 1700 so HABESHa is only the semetic speaking people of the horn I am. Somali from Somaliland so I know what I am talking about read futuj al habes then you will know oromo are new to the Highlands
Habash includes Ethiopia Eritrea Somalia Djibouti Comoros Mayotte Madagascar Kenya Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe Uganda Rwanda Burundi Botswana South Africa it includes Cushitic countries and Bantu countries as well Zanj was a part of Habash as well
When you can find ,,can you make a video about sahabe Ali rh and his rules of government, where he had even for grammar a position that been given to a sahabe
why does the video end with an AD? wtf?? and where is the complete video?
Left us hanging...whats missing ? where is part 2 or full lecture ?
Im guessing that the one thing missing from the list is military strength?
Please do a video on Abu bilal mirdas RH
Sahih al-Bukhari 7142
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "You should listen to and obey, your ruler even if he was an Ethiopian (black) slave whose head looks like a raisin."
Please talk about the suffryia khawarij
Does anyone know what is missing from the list?
Kharidjis or ibadis ?lmao
That he be "ahlu bait"
That is a condition for the shiates but not the sunnis
@@nin1269 The Shia are just making loud noise about it but in reality, even they won't allow someone from the prophet (saw) family look at Iran.
Thanks akhi can you recommend 3 Islamic books to gain wisdom
Read tafseer of Quran...
So what was it that was missing 😂?
Correct me if i am wrong but according Maliki, Hanbali, Shafi and Zahiri a Caliph must be from Quraysh otherwise it won't be accepted.
Only the Hanafi allowes a non-Arab to be a Caliph.
One criteria that missing from Sunni perspective, is : HE HAS TO BE A DESCENDANT OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD SAW.
Everyone could be a Caliph, whether he has direct lineage with the Prophet or not.
what is missing from the list is that the ruler must apply the islamic law strictly, if he doesn't do that then he doesn't have the juridiction to rule over Muslims no mather what other positive criterias he has.
How did Shiism move from a political affiliation to a theological school of thought?
Muawiya literally breaks two conditions. One probity, two he made turned khilafa into a dynasty
Wrong, Muawiya fits all conditions
@@karimmezghiche9921 No, he doesn't. Read
@@muhammadedwards8425
Read your Shia propaganda?
No thank you.
@@karimmezghiche9921 I'm maliki, but you clearly have no argument, only emotions
@@muhammadedwards8425
Sure you are
piousness,piety
The most powerful people in the world are above all those who practice their ancestral spirituality their mother tongue culture and ancestral tradition Without wanting to develop The paradigms of other foreign peoples
lies
Salaam brother, could you please make a video on Sheikh Abaadir Umar Al-Rida(Hejazi Saint), a legend who impaced Harar and somalia, one who united people to islam. His descent and story. Barakallahu Feekum.
❤❤❤
❤
Having a caliph father.
Justice is missing from the list!
💯
@@HISTORYUN how ironic is it that they made quraysh a condition but not justice which is basically applying the sharia! I gusss this suited the Umayyads Abbasid tyrants
@@ImamZaydInstituteto be fair the Zaydis made being a Sayyid a requirement which is also tribalistic. Wheras the Ibadis say whoever is the most pious/ learned and competent should be the Imam (leader)
where is the fucking full video??
Shiism is fully a theological current which is not only based on the succession of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) but finds its foundations in the Koran and tradition. Ignoring what Shiism is does not allow you to repeat like a parrot the absurdities told for centuries by the enemies of the Prophet and his family (peace be upon him and his purified family).
Brother i must correct you. Shia and Sunni Muslims disagree on the method of choosing a Caliphate. Sunnis see it as a political appointment (ie Muslims get to decide their ruler) while Shia believe the Caliph is strictly divinely appointed. Claiming it's just politics and not religious is either ignorant at best or dishonest at worst.
Or it could be an interpretation that you are not familiar with. Not everything that opposes your own understanding has to be misguided or ignorant. Mature a little
As’Salaam Alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakaatuh “Abyssinian” was eponym for the black race in classical Arabia of the period. And the term was not geographical in Arabian etymology; it did not mean a foreign adversarial state. And it certainly did not mean a slave, even though many dark skinned people had slave lineage. There are narrations of Abyssinian fighters training in the Prophet’s (SAW) masjid, while Aisha (RAA) looked on from behind him. We have to be careful in these elaborate exegeses, so that we do not impute our own derivations into the narration.
The stipulation of being a quraishi means the individual should have some link to the quraish, and the first ottoman othman married the daughter of his sheikh who was from from a syed background. Sheikh adibe.
Islam (and Arabic culture) is strictly patrilineal, Jewish culture is the one that recognises matrilineal heritage.
Muawiyah doesn’t have Adaala this assertion is from ibn Khalduns nasibi background within the ummayid caliphate in Spain.
By unanimous consent, Mu'awiyyah's reign was objectively the most successful up until his time. He was also the only governor to reign under multiple Rashidun Caliphs without once having been removed from his post.
He fulfilled the condition of Adala and was entrusted by Al-Hassan as a result.
Further details of the normative Sunni position (from a historical perspective) is covered in depth as part of the complete module on this topic.
We should be careful with certain statements, Ibn Khaldun was by no means not alone in his judgement and commentary in this regard
Barakallahu Feekum
Exactly and a sahih hadith mention it well ,,sahabe Ali rh is the door ,prophet Muhammed sav the way and Muaviye rh the heart of islam @@HISTORYUN
@@HISTORYUN what was the missing condition that you cut out at the end? Is it to be from the lineage of the Prophet (saas)?
@@sucrecalderonthat sounds like a fabrication to be honest. We only have 2/3 Sahih Ahadith from Sayyidna Mu'awiyyah and there are related by him, they are nothing close to what is claimed here.
Can you send a reference/citation for this supposed Sahih Hadith, it would be very valuable knowledge for us
Barakallahu Feekum
@@HISTORYUN i am not at home but tomorrow i guess i am able to send it
3:12 The Abyssinians were enemies with the Arabs? The Prophet pbuh did send his companions to Abyssinia. And then the pagan Arabs send “diplomats” to Nejashi, for him to deliver the companions to the pagans. So which Arabs were enemies with the Abyssinians at that time?
Why specially say an “Ethiopian/abyssinian” and not just say a person with a raisin head?
It is the equivalent of telling Chinese soldiers to obey a Japanese commander. And the Aksumite empire has attempted to march upon Makkah and demolish the Ka'bah only 60 years prior, so it's not difficult to understand why the Arabs would have some level of enmity towards them. Yes, the Negus helped the early Muslims migrants, but that was the exception not the rule, the Aksumite empire has conquered Yemen and were considered colonisers by Arabs in general
A person with a raisin head only touches upon one of the key points (that of a disability or physical ailment), not the others (i.e. lack of freedom as a slave and political rivalry as an Abyssinian).
It would be the equivalent of telling the American senate to pledge their loyalty to Mullah Omar when he was alive
"Be patriots by pledging loyalty to the president even if he were a one eyes Afghan prisoner of war"
It's Hyperbole, a rhetorical device used to draw the immediate attention of the listener and to etch a message in their memory. Not to be taken literally
@@HISTORYUNUmar was Abyssinian on his father’s side. Bilal was Abyssinian on his mother’s side. Our prophet was breastfed by an Abyssinian. Only Negus of Ethiopia accepted the letter sent to the three kings. The prophet said specifically not to attack Abyssinia. So much more evidence… they aren’t enemies of the Arabs. Yemen and Ethiopia were having disputes about Judaism and Christianity, that’s why Abyssinians invaded. And Allah gave them victory for 100 years. The thing they did wrong was attack the Ka’ba. Not to mention that Abyssinians were waiting for the prophet in Medina and knew about him. The prophet even referred to them as Jews.
@@Nobody-yq9fk that sounds pleasant however it is wishful thinking and not based in reality.
Everything you have cited it coming from early Muslim interactions and very specific instances that did not and do not represent the general sentiment held by Arabs as a whole.
The fact of the matter is that Arabs in general still curse the grave of Abū Righāl, he was an Arab who cooperated with Abraha. The bitter sentiment of his betrayal still remains to this day as people pelt the site where is he buried.
If you want further evidence, ask the Yemeni about the Akhdaam, the descendents of the Ethiopians who remained in Yemen following the Abyssinian retreat. To this day, they are marginalised and the enmity remains as a result of the Ethiopian presence on the continent.
There are many more examples but there isn't sufficient space nor enough time to waste on a topic that is so evident and clear.
And there is nothing wrong with the Arabs having a bitter aftertaste considering the fact that they were colonised and also on the verge of having their most sacred site totally desecrated and annihilated. It's got nothing to do with race, everything to do with the history and experience
The same would apply to the modern Chinese vis-a-vis the Japanese occupation....
@@HISTORYUN You’re right about the first two paragraphs, but I’m not debating that. I’m debating the fact that “Ethiopians are enemies to Arabs”. Abraha was a collaborator with Roman psuedo Christian trinitarian pagans. When the Quran mentioned ‘nasara’ he was mentioning the Nazarene Christian’s who were in Abyssinia, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Arabia, and greater Sham. Little by little they dwindled but the majority of believing Muslim Nasara were in Abyssinia. They still pray like Muslims in Lalibella to this day. The Arabs would’ve never learned about Christianity or even Judaism if it wasn’t for Ethiopians, Iraqis, and Syrians. Even Roman’s. This is a long discussion. Ethiopians and Arabs aren’t sworn enemies. Arabs and Abyssinians have been trading and marrying together since the time of the kingdom of Saba and the queen who met Sulayman. Maybe I’m being biased because I’m Abyssinian, but the reason why two orphans who are breastfed by the same person aren’t able to marry is because they become brothers by DNA. Hamza and Muhammad saw were brothers because breastmilk carries dna that shapes your face and your bones. This is a proven fact. Allah would never humiliate his most beloved creation by being breastfed by an enemy. But… I understand where you’re coming from. There is just a lot of nuance and context to these bland statements and of course I understand that these podcasts would be 5 hrs long if you had to explain all of it. I just want the people in the comment section to understand that statements have nuance and meaning that may seemingly contradict, but might both be true at the same time.
@@HISTORYUN Al Akdam are not all Abyssinian. the Mahri or Al Mahra is the same as Am (Al in proto Semitic language) as Amhara. There are Yemenis and Abyssinians all over Yemen and Abyssinia. I don’t understand how you can call yourself a historian and you don’t understand conquests and migration. How do you think there are millions of central Asians and Turks in Turkey today? Or Persia? Or wherever else they invaded and settled. This isn’t as cut and dry as you say.
Its funny how this guys uses warriors picture as kharijite.
We shouldn't try to interpret this, unless we have something from the Prophet or an explanation from the Companions or those after them or go to the scholars and see what their qiyas is and even then we should say the opinion of fulan, fulan and leave it at that ! And you have to understand that they knew what he meant so it was clear to them !
shia or sunni, who rules or not rules, but what they had done to Hassan, Husain is not at all acceptable.
even during caliph of Abubakkar, if they had hurt Fatima rali allahu anha, then its also crime.
Remember the hadith, some of the known companions will not be allowed to drink from hawl al kawther even though Prophet sallahu alahi waslam says i know them....
Abu Bakr didn't hurt Fatimah Alaihisalam Hussain Alaihisalam did made dua for Abu Bakr Radi'Allahu Anhu Omar Radi'Allahu Anhu. He was pleased with their reign. Read the full letter of Hussain Alaihisalam to peace of Basra. Problem started actually from Mawviya. The three khulafa are innocent of accuse including Aisha Radi'Allahu Anha
Even he said he raised her house when stating the three things he regretted during his life while in his deathbed
Biggest lie ever told after the wafat of Rasulallah (swas) is, Leadership belongs to Quraish only. Allah sent His messenger to unite people by destroying any discrimination on the basis of blood, color, tribe or nationality and make them worship one God only. But people after prophet (swas) lied in the name of the prophet, buried his body without Janazah and established Quraish later on Arab supremacy.
All of Africa was called Habash, including the Somalis who controlled all the coasts of East Africa. How did the sahabas enter Ethiopia without crossing Somalia first 🇸🇴?
Facts Ethiopia has no access to water, they surely had to pass through somalia
Ditect lineage with the Prophet pbuh
Muawiya failed at probity.
Also there are two more conditions, the Caliphate CAN NOT be a dynasty. And a difference of opinion, can not be a Hashemite out of fear for the first condition
1. Mu'awiyyah was the ONLY governor who served under ALL the Khulapha Rashidun and was never removed from his post, ever.
2. There are only 5 conditions stated by the scholars of the Sunni school, there are no 6th conditions other than in the Shi'a or Kharijite schools (as covered in the full lecture here).
@@HISTORYUN By later Sunni scholars yes, but we should also listen to the demands of the previous caliphs (as the maliki school does) who had a condition of dynastic succession being haram. The faults of Yazid is on Muawiya who gave him that power on relation and not piety. Also there is ijtihad on quraishi condition being haram as well (Ali was particularly stern with this). Both of those were likely influenced by Ummayyads to justify their rule
Agreed, however the Sunni school is pragmatic and has had to adapt political theory to actual reality with the advantage of retrospective knowledge (something that the earlier schools didn't have)
Political theory has been shifted with the advent of Umayyads and the arrival of the Mongols.
In an ideal world, the list would be more comprehensive and certainly more prescriptive, however the reality does not give much room and the fear of Sunni scholars is that having too prescriptive a set of rules could lead to endless cycles of revolution and rebellion (because most kings fell short of the ideal standard set by Islam anyway). It's an interesting discussion nevertheless
We've had an endless succession of failed monarchies instead. We should choose to learn. The Ulamah failed in its ijtihad except for those who stayed true to meritocracy. "Khilafa" Dynasties are haram and the next will not be Quraish or a tyrant
Qurayshi lineage Abrogated? This is the view of the jumhur, how could something be abrogated without any nusūs?
The same way cutting the hand of the thief was suspended during the year of Famine in Madinah. Baqillani explained why this condition was no longer practical in his day and age (and the video is clear in that when the condition is reinstated, so is the rule)
@@HISTORYUN the issue I have is the term *abrogated* sure you could say that the condition wouldn’t apply in this case (although I disagree) but to say abrogated is falsehood
@@abelo2305 We will have to agree to disagree. The text says abrogated and it has been conveyed as such, context was provided following the statement. Barakallahu Feekum
@@HISTORYUN wa feek
Are you saying muslims uprise are because of poverty, needing more freedom or due to bad/un islamic governance, lawlessness?
Well brother, historical facts can't be denied through own bias and quoting zaeef ahadees. Few questions for you, hope you would think and try stopping yourself from misleading simple souls.
1. You quoted a Zaeef hadees. Okay, for your concern let's consider it right for a while. Did Muaviyah followed the Muslim ruler of his time or did he conspire?
2. Probity! Just few selected events from the life of Muaviyah
a. Declaring Ziyad son of Sumaayah as his illegitimate brother ( check ahadees on the matter)
b. Originating Amarat in Islamic ruling claiming to be competing Romans (against the teachings of Prophet PBUH)
c. Killing of Shaba in cold blood while in his custody (Hazrat Hair Bin Adi and his companions)
d. Starting cursing tradition on Hazrat Ali Karam Ullah Wajhoh in Friday sermon, the filthy tradition that continued for decades.
e. Killing of Hazrat Hasan R.A (being clarified through many resources)
f. Not fulfilling any of the conditions of Sulah with Hazrat Hasan R.A (what more Yiu want of probity)
g. Putting forward Yazeed knowing he is the worst of choices and putting all ummah in fitnah
h. Killing of thousands of sahaba in wars against rightful Caliph Hazrat Ali R.A
3. As for knowledge, he initiated the wicked politics which involves all immoral acts in order to fortify ones rule. So yes we can say that he set an evil example and constituted ways and means being followed by all oppressors in todays world.
4. As for fitness, it's written in history books that he was abnormally obese due to his eating habits as a result of Prophet's baddua written in revered Ahle sunnah ahadees books
5. As for your definition, Namrood, Firaun were quite competitive. Check history, they had such a control over masses, they were wealthy and caused progress in their ears, however they questioned Allah's authority, SA e for Moaviah
* Plus you misquoted being intellectually dishonest when you said that Shia movement was just political in beginning. Shias, have lots of references including Ghadeer where Prophet delivered clearly (Man Kunto Maula Fahaza Aliun Maula), being a continuous hadees!
Many books could be written however I have just provided some references to research oriented minds. So brother, it's an advice to stop imposing wrong history and interpretation upon simple souls
Regards
M6 van Marokko voldoet aan alle voorwaarde om de islamitische wereld te leiden.
Did you just say that the Quraish don’t exist?
Yes. They do exist. Many muslims have hatred for them
0:31
Not true unfortunately shia raised the twelve imams to the level even beyond the prophethood
It was clearly mentioned that the Tashayyu' of that epoch was purely political and not yet theological. Many Sahabah took the political position of supporting Ali, so they were Shiat Ali from that standing.
It's grossly anachronistic to apply what the 12er Shi'a believe today - back onto those alive during the lifetime of Imam Ali ('Aleihi Salaam).
There is no obedience if the ruler is corrupt or tyrant or unjust
It has never been abrogated that the requirement for caliphate is to be from Quraysh. Muslims just decided to disobey the prophet. That’s why we live as humiliated people. Muslims today are like those who argued about the rulership of Talut.
There is no requirement that he must be of Quraish.
@@nasrhussain9126 The Hadith are so clear on this I know you don’t know anything about what you’re talking about. The last few Hadith are talking about you and the people that gave birth to you.
"Islam will continue to be triumphant until there have been twelve Caliphs, all of them from Quraysh." (Muslim)
"Verily this matter [of rule] shall [remain] in Quraysh so long as when they are asked for mercy, they show mercy, when they rule, they are just, and when they distribute, they are equitable, so whoever from them does not do this, then upon him is the curse of Allah, the angels and all of humankind, and compulsory acts and voluntary acts will not be accepted from him" (Ahmad, al-Bazzar, al-Tabrani with trustworthy narrators as cited in Majma al-Zawa'id (5:193))
Allah's Messenger (saw) said to Quraysh, "Verily this matter [of rule] shall [remain] among you and you shall remain in charge of it, until you innovate actions [that deprives you of Allah's support], and when you do this, Allah shall impose upon you the worst of His creation which will tear you apart just as a stick is torn apart." (Ahmad, al-Tabrani, Ahmad)
Sahih al-Bukhari 7140
Narrated Ibn `Umar:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "This matter (caliphate) will remain with the Quraish even if only two of them were still existing."
Sahih Muslim 1821 d
It has been narrated on the authority of Jabir b. Samura who said:
I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say: Islam will continue to be triumphant until there have been twelve Caliphs. Then the Prophet (ﷺ) said something which I could not understand. I asked my father: What did he say? He said: He has said that all of them (twelve Caliphs) will be from the Quraish.
“People are subservient to Quraysh in this matter: the Muslims among them [being subservient] to the Muslims among them, and the disbelievers among them [being subservient] to the disbelievers among them.” (Sahih Muslim)
"This matter will remain in Quraysh, so long as two of them remain" (Muslim, Volume 9, Book 89, Number 254)
'This matter (of the caliphate) will remain with the Quraish, and none will rebel against them, but Allah will throw him down on his face as long as they stick to the rules and regulations of the religion (Islam).'" (Muslim, Volume 9, Book 89, Number 253)
It was narrated that Jaabir ibn Samurah said: I entered upon the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) with my father, and I heard him say: “This matter will not end until there have been among them twelve caliphs.” Then he said something that I could not hear, and I said to my father: What did he say? He said: “All of them will be from Quraysh.” Narrated by al-Bukhari (no. 7222); Muslim (no. 1821).
(al-Bukhaari) it says: “There will be twelve rulers.” Then he said something I did not hear, and my father said that he said: “All of them will be from Quraysh.”
Sahih Bukhari 4.56.704:
…Beware of such hopes as make the people go astray, for I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘Authority of ruling will remain with Quraish, and whoever bears hostility to them, Allah will destroy him as long as they abide by the laws of the religion.’ “
Abu Bakr: “The Arabs (in general) they will not submit regarding this affair except to this group of Quraysh.”
Nuaym bin Hammad Kitab Al Fitan 25
Hudhayfa: The Hour will not arise until you kill your imam, draw your swords, and the evilest of you inherit this world
“The Hour will not come until Allah takes away the. best people on earth; only the worst people will be left”
Nuaym bin Hammad Kitab Al Fitan 500-501
Abt Bakr b. Hazm??: The Prophet said: “This world will not go until it belongs to an idiot son of an idiot.”
Hudhayfa: The Prophet said: “The Hour will not arise until the most felicitous of the people is an idiot son of an idiot.”
@@nasrhussain9126 there is. The fact that you don’t know this is an example of why this current Muslim umma is being humiliated. The Shia argued that he should be from Ali. There was always consensus even from the first Shura council of Abu Bakr that it has to be from Quraysh. Even the ansar understood this. That’s why the first non Qurayshi to ever claim any type of rulership over Muslims was a Turkic. You are probably a Turk. All of the Hadith about this are mutawatir how don’t you know this
@@Nobody-yq9fk Can you provide one authentic Hadeeth requiring this?
@@nasrhussain9126 I already did
Who are the Quraish today?
Royal House of Morocco & Jordan
@@HISTORYUNso you believe it is likely that the Mahdi is Moroccan or Jordanian?
False inference, fallacious conclusion....
"Chinese mothers gave birth to children, Obama is somebody's child.... therefore his mother was Chinese!"
The Mahdi will be from Madinah. It's possible to be an Ashraf and from Quraish without being a descendant of the Moroccan or Jordanian dynasty
@@HISTORYUNplease examine this narration from a book called Asratu Sa’at.
Translation:
الصحيح في صفاته أنه آدم، ضرب من الرجال ربعة أجلي الجبهة، أقني الأنف أشمه أزج أبلج، أعين أكحل العينين، براق الثنايا، كث اللحية في كتفه علامة النبي صلي الله عليه وسلم أذيل الفخذين لونه لون عربي و جسمه جسم إسرائيلي في لسانه ثقل و إذا أبطأ عليه الكلام ضرب الأيسر بيده اليمني، ابن أربعين سنة و في رواية ما بين الثلاثين إلي للأربعين
What is correct about his characteristics is that he is black, a type of man with a four-pointed forehead (broad forehand) a pointed nose, a prominent nose, dark-coloured eyes, shiny contours, a thick beard on his shoulder, a sign of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, gap on the thighs (broad thighs big/long bones), an Arab color (dark complexion) and his body is an Israeli body, and his tongue has heaviness.
When his tongue gets heavy and his words became slow (to speak), he hits his left thigh with his right hand.
Son of forty years old, (classical Arabic way of saying he is of that age son of..) and according to a narration, he is between thirty and forty.
The Kalifah is chosen by Ahlul 'ilm, and the requirements of the Kalifah are more than 5 conditions.
The Hadith you mentioned is interesting, there is also one in Muslim, where the Prophet Muhammed, salalahu aleyhi wa salam, said, If a black slave with a mutilated nose is appointed to govern you, and he leads you according to the Book of Allah, then listen to him and obey.
It highlights the importance of obeying the ruler regardless of his appearance.
When the fitnah occurred between the Noble Companions, radiyallahu anhuma, you have one group that wanted the killers of Uthman to be brought in to justice and one group which is Ali, wanted to wait becouse of the fitnah but both of them agreed to bring the killers of Uthman into justice, however, they differed in to when.
The first sect that appeared in Islam, was the khawarij, then from them came shia out. Abdullah ibn saba, the founder of shiism, claimed Ali was god, and he cast aspersion against the 3 khulafa rashidiin, Ali, told them to repent, they refused, he burned them alive, however, Abdullah ibn saba fled to another country and spread his disease.
ruling according to the book of ALLAH that is important, rest and all is not important. that's what Prophet sallahu alahi wasalam wants to stress.
@@mshafimd what he said is fake .
Why are you spreading fake information if you don't know don't misinform. The narrative you are presenting is given by Nasbi which is lie . You will be answerable to Allah Azzawajal for sharing false information. Fear Allah Azzawajal. Audhubillah.
Killing someone by burning them alive isn't permissible in Islam. It's not possible that Imam Ali would have gone against the rulings of Islam to punish a man.
There isn't enough historical evidence to support the tale of Abdullah ibn Saba. He was first mentioned by Sayf ibn Umar who lived around a century after the supposed ibn Saba's lifetime and about whom many scholars including Abu Dawud said was unreliable.
Just
I’m unsure why we feel the need to only single out that Shi’ism as a theological school was a later development? This seems like sectarian bias since you’ve neglected to mention that Sunnism as a theological school is also considered a later development both by non-Sunni Muslims and by academia. Just as an example the idea of the four Rashidun caliphs became solidified as a doctrine primarily through Ahmad b. Hanbal.
What’s the most authentic Shia book?
@@IamfsalyI’m not Shia but the most authentic book of the Shia is the Musad of imam Zayd RH. That of the Zaydi school.
@@AllAboutIslam_True The book is not authentically attributed to imam zaid ibn Ali because the sanad goes back to amr bin Khalid Al-Wasiti and many scholars accused him of lying about like Ali al-daraqutni - ibn aljawzi - Ahmed ibn muhammed alshaibani and he is the only one who narrated those ahadith , and no one else narrated it alongside him, and strange thing is that Imam Muhammad Al-Baqir, who is the brother of Zaid bin Ali, did not see any of it, even though their fathers, Ali bin Al-Hussein and Muhammad Al-Baqir, are twenty-four years older than Zaid, as he was born in the year 56 Hijri and died in 118 hijri!
@@Iamfsaly and I’m sure the Shia would say the Hadiths in bukhari and muslim arn’t correctly attributed to Muhammad ﷺ. The sects go on and fight for themselves.
@@Iamfsaly the Zaydis say what you have said is lies, and you say what they say are lies. Allah knows best between you.
Shias is the leader
There is no difference of opinion being from Qurashite descent, the ahadith are clear, no one rejects this but a heretic or infidel.
Their is no requirement he is from Quraish. The hadeeth stated a factual statement not a requirement.
Ideally. Whether the imaan is strong enough for Arabs to submit to a non-Arab leader today.
Saba/sheba>sabbeans>qatanti>Arab=Islam racist
Khilafat has nothing to do with Islam
That is untrue
Well it is not obligatory as individual, but it is communal responsibility
Muawiyah was not adil. He waged war against two caliphs, broke the treaty with al-Hassan, established a culture of cursing Ali, has the blood of each of the first four caliphs' sons on his hands (just one example is Muhammad bin Abu Bakr), and he did not take the caliphhood in an appropriate and just way. His father raised his sword against the Prophet, his son raised an army against Hussain, and he raised an army against Ali and Hassan. His actions are inexcusable and unforgivable.
You are wrong, u r shia , you are not among us Muslims
He's a Muslim nonetheless, cry.
Fear Allah speaking ill and slandering a sahaba with no daleel
@@sj-to3edHe is speaking haq he killed Muhammad bin AbuBakr A.S son of Hazrat AbuBakr A.S and sewn his body in donkey skin and burned him.
@@asadhussain995 bring the daleel
Salaam brother, in regard to the raisin head hadith can you go into detail about that!
I was confronted about that by someone that claimed prophet muhammed was a racist and i did not have the knowledge to counter that ? Please brother can you take out the time for this inshAllah
Wa Aleikum Salam
Certainly.
وَأَطِيعُوا وَإِنِ اسْتُعْمِلَ عَلَيْكُمْ عَبْدٌ حَبَشِيٌّ كَأَنَّ رَأْسَهُ زَبِيبَةٌ "
Firstly, it wasn't a general statement (as often intimated by enemies of Islam) towards all black people, rather it was a Hyperbolic statement intended to stress the importance of obeying a ruler EVEN if he had qualities that were otherwise not allowed
1. Physical disability/impairment (this is where the description of a raisin is relevant, it highlights a disability/abnormality)
2. A Slave cannot rule anyone, but in this Hadith it mentions "even if a slave". Again, it's Hyperbolic and intended to reinforce a command in the extreme (but not literal form)
3. He is described as Abyssinian (emphasising his Culture and tribal identity and NOT his ethnicity/race/colour). The Abyssinians were the same people who in their recent history had marched to destroy Makkah, the Arabs naturally had some level of enmity towards Abyssinians as a result (which is perfectly normal, which nation loves their coloniser?)
When you consider all of this, the key Takeaway is that Prophet Muhammad ﷺ is addressing his own followers and stressing the importance of being obedient to a Muslim ruler EVEN if he embodies virtually all the prohibited attributes for being a leader (breaking the 5 conditions outlined in the video).
It's not a description of Africans neither an insult but actually endorsement and a command to obey such a person.
In practical terms, prophet Muhammad ﷺ did indeed elect a young Black man (16) to lead the entire Muslim army shortly after that (Usamah Ibn Zayd) and some people had an issue with this, but they did as they were told and obeyed him.
He didn't have any disability, he wasn't a slave but he was black.
Prophet Muhammad ﷺ practiced what he preached, so it wasn't just rhetoric and idealism. His disciples also implemented his teachings as they were told to.
This is the correct and proper context for this incident. A beautiful and empowering lesson
Bilal(ra) stood on top of the Kaaba and gave the adhan. Imagine a black African, standing on top of the Kaaba, looking down at Arab society and calling the prayer? Pretty breathing taking to think of.
The prophet(saw) suckled from a black woman. The depiction of Musa(as) when the prophet(saw) went on the night journey was that he was completely black.
Also.. name me any society today where a poor, downcasted, prisoner of war/ indentured servant could one day be a caliph of a Muslim nation? Not even in 2024 in any nation/religion in the world.
@@shahid8545We all know the humiliation and disrespect Obama and his wife endured while he was president. From cartoons of his wife being a Monkey, accused of being a man with makeup and not to mention the endless childish taunts of him being an illegal migrant without a valid passport.
In fact, there's still a video of a senator brazenly calling him a Liar in his face.
This was the perfect example of a people being deliberately disrespectful and insubordinate to their leader, purely because he was (half) Black!
They would not have behaved this way had they learned the Hadith in question and applied it !
The irony of such nations pointing a finger towards Islam and misquoting this beautiful Hadith as evidence of racism.
They have absolutely nothing to teach anyone about anything when it comes to treating people with respect regardless of race. They may argue that at least they had a Black president but the sad reality is that NOT EVEN their Black President was safe from open racial harassment and bullying, so much more for the unknown citizen....
No leader in the history of mankind has called for racial equality more sincerely and openly than prophet Muhammad ﷺ, and definitely not from the other major religious traditions of the world.
@@HISTORYUN Well said akhi. Absolutely right. One could even suggest racism is getting worse in the west overall. With the colonialization project immigrants are fleeing for safety and of course many of them flee to the western world. With the sudden influx of immigrants the racism is absolutely rife here and if allowed to be fully expressive it would be suffocating.
Actually this hadith is the most anti-racist statement that can be made. Obey him and treat him as your leader even if he looks like the darkest raisin.
Adala includes justice