Just to clarify, the sw210 definitely does NOT have a date and there is no ghost date position on this watch. The sw215 has a date, that’s the equivalent of the 210 but with the added date complication. If I remember rightly Eddie platts is not fond of using things like date movements in no date watches.
Thanks for this, I got the impression because when I use my finger nail to engage the crown, I got to a "first" position, where the seconds does not hack. Another firm pull causes the seconds to hack. Given there is no ghost date as you mentioned, and how consistently I'm encountering the same issue (I went to check after your comment), it is most likely because part the thread on the stem are rough and keep catching on to the same parts of the groove.
Just to clarify, the sw210 definitely does NOT have a date and there is no ghost date position on this watch. The sw215 has a date, that’s the equivalent of the 210 but with the added date complication. If I remember rightly Eddie platts is not fond of using things like date movements in no date watches.
Thanks for this, I got the impression because when I use my finger nail to engage the crown, I got to a "first" position, where the seconds does not hack. Another firm pull causes the seconds to hack.
Given there is no ghost date as you mentioned, and how consistently I'm encountering the same issue (I went to check after your comment), it is most likely because part the thread on the stem are rough and keep catching on to the same parts of the groove.
Nice one.
Thanks for watching man.