Your commentary was incredibly entertaining and made this video interesting to watch despite how a research journal is typically "boring". I hope you do more of these in the future
this is excellent . Please continue im doing a masters afer 30 years of not studying and you are helping me. I love your no nonsense style .... please keep this up
Thanks! I felt like I was watching a suspense movie towards the end LOL. Unfortunatelly I would've missed the selection of the sample :-/ Anyway, this been a really good incentive for reading papers with a more critical view. I really need to get a lot of experience to come up with the same conclusions. Thanks again and keep them coming Dr Patwari!
Would you mind explaining relative risk ratio and odds ratio. How to read them in the study. Also would like to learn more on what is beta coefficient. Also reduced risk.
Dr Patwari, in the case os clinical apraisal of a negative study, namely a study that show no difference in intervention, how to interpret using the c.i.? Is correct to say that the "not-significant" cross of the "no effect" line interpretation is lost?
the control groups would inform the GI Doctors that they have some coffee intolerance and it causes them to have tummy aches ,there's no reason for them to hide it, but it's mentioned no where in the study..so not sure how u drew this conclusion..also if it was really this "flaw" in the study, the peer review would detect it and not let false biased scientific claims get published in such prestigious journal.
Your commentary was incredibly entertaining and made this video interesting to watch despite how a research journal is typically "boring".
I hope you do more of these in the future
Thanks. I hope to... but got a couple of others to do first.
Wow thanks. You put it in simple way and easy to understand
this is excellent . Please continue im doing a masters afer 30 years of not studying and you are helping me. I love your no nonsense style .... please keep this up
Thanks! I felt like I was watching a suspense movie towards the end LOL. Unfortunatelly I would've missed the selection of the sample :-/ Anyway, this been a really good incentive for reading papers with a more critical view. I really need to get a lot of experience to come up with the same conclusions. Thanks again and keep them coming Dr Patwari!
Very interesting - I am binge watching your videos. Thank you for this knowledge.
Thanks a lot... You really made it look so easy..
this video is so useful for those who just go for their postgraduate studies! thanks~
Can you keep up with your wonderful way of reading analyzing, i learned a lot
Very much informative
Learned lot thanks
Thanks alot for this simplefied and perfect way to learn us .
Would you mind explaining relative risk ratio and odds ratio. How to read them in the study. Also would like to learn more on what is beta coefficient. Also reduced risk.
Very informative. Just curious what software you are using for capture and annotation of the presentation? Thanks!
Good video, although in the doctors defence, they did not bluntly write that there was a causal relationship, although it was suggestive.
Dr Patwari, in the case os clinical apraisal of a negative study, namely a study that show no difference in intervention, how to interpret using the c.i.? Is correct to say that the "not-significant" cross of the "no effect" line interpretation is lost?
Can you make any videos on how to read drug advertisements? Its a huge issue for USMLE students like ME :(
the control groups would inform the GI Doctors that they have some coffee intolerance and it causes them to have tummy aches ,there's no reason for them to hide it, but it's mentioned no where in the study..so not sure how u drew this conclusion..also if it was really this "flaw" in the study, the peer review would detect it and not let false biased scientific claims get published in such prestigious journal.