Budget Magic: Dubious Challenge (Pioneer)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 жов 2024
  • How many turn three Worldspine Wurms does it take to win a game of Pioneer? Let's find out!
    Today's video is brought to you by Card Kingdom. You can pick up some cards and support the show at www.cardkingdo...
    ► Read more about this deck (full article): www.mtggoldfis...
    ► View this deck with the latest prices: www.mtggoldfis...
    ◼ Purchase this deck (paper): mtg.fish/NX7iY
    ◼ Purchase this deck (Magic Online): mtg.fish/FIjsA
    Match 1: 5:16
    Match 2: 20:48
    Match 3: 31:21
    Match 4: 42:54
    Match 5: 55:59

КОМЕНТАРІ • 169

  • @silverfist727martin4
    @silverfist727martin4 4 роки тому +100

    First opponent had to have just been blazed out their mind

    • @Jandau85
      @Jandau85 4 роки тому +34

      Are you implying that someone named Magicmann420 would ever smoke the Devil's Lettuce?

    • @silverfist727martin4
      @silverfist727martin4 4 роки тому +32

      @@Jandau85 Good sir, I am implying that perhaps they were simply reviewing their Scriptures studies and emulating Moses, and consulting the Burning Bush and we're distracted enough to punt the match

    • @carter9449
      @carter9449 4 роки тому

      "why is he main phasing his collected companies"

    • @Kryptnyt
      @Kryptnyt 4 роки тому +3

      Hey, stupid people are allowed to play Magic too, you know.

  • @monoblack542
    @monoblack542 4 роки тому +76

    Many still claim the stop is still set on Seth's draw step to this day

  • @aaronnava5656
    @aaronnava5656 4 роки тому +39

    Seth: *Punts occasionally*
    Opponents playing against Dubious Challenge: Hold my beer

  • @lucaslahlum6331
    @lucaslahlum6331 4 роки тому +100

    Seth: let’s dubious challenge our opponents
    Opponents: let’s dubiously give Seth wins because we don’t understand the card.

    • @riccardocalosso5688
      @riccardocalosso5688 4 роки тому +4

      I guess they thought challenge revealed 2 cards for Seth to add in hand, nobody expect them straight to the battlefield!

  • @zacharymccutcheon8607
    @zacharymccutcheon8607 4 роки тому +49

    Nice Zacama you have there...

  • @Jesin00
    @Jesin00 4 роки тому +117

    You don't have Zacama in your deck, only Zetalpa!

    • @Adam-pc2cm
      @Adam-pc2cm 4 роки тому +13

      That was the wrong giant dinosaur!

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +43

      Zacama, Zetalpa. These dinosaur names...

    • @jebooiii6462
      @jebooiii6462 4 роки тому +9

      @@MTGGoldfish potato tomato

    • @jonathanstudentkit
      @jonathanstudentkit 4 роки тому +3

      @@jebooiii6462 these vegetable names :-D

  • @mcintyre0591
    @mcintyre0591 4 роки тому +107

    Is the interface that bad that everyone seems to take nothing off of dubious challenge?

    • @silviolopar6587
      @silviolopar6587 4 роки тому +1

      nop, they just dont read the cards and press ok.

  • @lijahh1846
    @lijahh1846 4 роки тому +26

    Anyone else just over here living vicariously through the pummeler player that just said "screw it" and punched the wurm?

  • @abheekpandya8717
    @abheekpandya8717 4 роки тому +28

    Take a shot every time Seth calls Zetalpa Zacama

  • @chuckstevens4985
    @chuckstevens4985 4 роки тому +63

    Bant spirits playing lumbering falls tilted me. Edit: ok everything they did hurt my head lol.

    • @MidgarMerc
      @MidgarMerc 4 роки тому +4

      @@dirty_mac when you have like 6 one drops probably not ideal

    • @DimT670
      @DimT670 4 роки тому +2

      Magicmann420 punting? Gee I wonder why ;)

    • @rpglover5955
      @rpglover5955 4 роки тому +2

      Honestly, the most egregious thing about the list is calling it bant at all. It literally only splashes green for Coco (with most lists running 12 shock lands + the 4 Green Fast lands that can tap for green), everything else is UW spirits. I'd rather it be called Spirits Company for the pioneer version, Modern at the very least has around 33% of its non-land cards be green, and it being called bant spirits makes sense.

  • @thomassugg9856
    @thomassugg9856 4 роки тому +1

    I watch many of these videos and the concept of this deck has and your play-style/opponent's lack of knowledge have brought much enjoyment as I watch this one! Thanks for the original and enjoyable content, Seth!!! Some of my favorite on UA-cam!

  • @Krossfyre
    @Krossfyre 4 роки тому +68

    Lol, match 1 game 1 the opponent must have been thinking, "Why the heck am I playing Coco when I could be cheating out fatties for the same cost?"
    Although as I'm watching it just appears they don't know MODO very well or might be pretty new in general.

    • @Diotialate
      @Diotialate 4 роки тому +7

      Some of his choices were pretty dubious.

    • @ShiningSpear
      @ShiningSpear 4 роки тому +19

      "Magicmann420"
      You know, I think there might be another potential explanation for those plays

    • @wasted4satan390
      @wasted4satan390 4 роки тому +3

      @@ShiningSpear my thoughts exactly

    • @canismajor1186
      @canismajor1186 4 роки тому +1

      I think they were new. Probably trying out a friends account.

    • @poopoo9797
      @poopoo9797 4 роки тому +11

      Na I was just pretty hi and playing after an all nighter I didn't even read his cards lol but it's coo it was just a. 2 player quene for practice no one plays the deck in a real tournament but I punted like crazy and still won a game so it was fun 😁

  • @lifeiaskedfor
    @lifeiaskedfor 4 роки тому +17

    Seth: dramoka is good against control.
    Also seth: *is confused why they didn't try to counter the uncounterable dragon*

    • @TheQueerLeaf99
      @TheQueerLeaf99 4 роки тому

      SloaTheDemon lol

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +17

      For some reason I was thinking it just kept you opponent from casting spells on your turn, but it's uncounterable too!

  • @fenixdiegorodriguez
    @fenixdiegorodriguez 4 роки тому +9

    Hey Seth, quarantine days have been rough, thanks for keep uploading videos

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +4

      Glad they are helpful :) Stay well!

  • @dizzybuttons
    @dizzybuttons 4 роки тому +21

    New idea for a series:
    Combine all the titles of your series.
    Against the Budget about Nothing.
    Its expensive decks that don't do much.

    • @JMSginoclave
      @JMSginoclave 4 роки тому +5

      Every single proxy EDH match then

    • @TheEdgedCarbine
      @TheEdgedCarbine 4 роки тому +1

      Seth, please listen to this viewer!

  • @79awinkler
    @79awinkler 4 роки тому +1

    Tha k you for your videos right now. My world is turned upside down right now and it is nice to have some mtg to watch. Thank you

  • @bigtimetimmyjim6486
    @bigtimetimmyjim6486 4 роки тому +13

    The play from your first opponent was highly...dubious.

  • @ErasMcras
    @ErasMcras 4 роки тому +3

    I remember your first dubious challenge list. When I was playing modern humans someone cast glimmer point stag and I them predicted them with meddling mage on dubious challenge later on the messaged me about it. It was great

  • @Bobal27
    @Bobal27 4 роки тому +14

    1:04:45 Why not pick two charming princes? Also, in other games, why not seal away during combat, after attacks have been declared, to prevent the damage?

    • @scottyboy76567
      @scottyboy76567 4 роки тому +6

      The seal away is probably because he's hoping that the opponent will play something in second main and not hold up mana for a counterspell.

    • @Bobal27
      @Bobal27 4 роки тому +1

      Scott Crawford For some of the games, and times, I get that. But against the energy deck?

    • @VictorTheLegend
      @VictorTheLegend 4 роки тому +5

      Getting 2 princes is not so bad for the 4 mana investment

  • @fateweaver9
    @fateweaver9 4 роки тому +12

    Confusing that silly flappy bird Zetalpa for the almighty ZACAMA(!). SMH
    LOL

  • @YayapLives
    @YayapLives 4 роки тому +25

    I like how you're freaking out about having two princes in your hand because that'll make it less likely that you hit them with dubious challenge...
    But there's no reason you can't just play the princes _after_ the dubious challenge. Just casually take the 15 and you're fine.

    • @YayapLives
      @YayapLives 4 роки тому +6

      Though if you had wanted to be safe. There was that point where you could have played the two princes then you can do a prince bounce combo where you have one prince exile the other prince which will then exile the other prince which will then exile the other prince basically giving you the option to have a prince trigger at the end of every turn. then when you cast dubious challenge it doesn't matter if you wiff because no matter what they take the prince comes back.

    • @dankurach5340
      @dankurach5340 4 роки тому

      What a coward.

    • @joshhupp
      @joshhupp 4 роки тому +1

      One, two, princes held before you
      That's what I said, now
      Princes, Princes who scry for you
      Just go ahead, now
      One has Worldspine in his pockets
      That's some Wurm, now
      This one, said he wants to bounce Dromokas
      Ain't in his head, now

  • @Atmapalazzo
    @Atmapalazzo 4 роки тому +6

    The seth numeric system:
    1, 17, a million, infinite

    • @derek61806
      @derek61806 4 роки тому

      Atmapalazzo best Seth comment of the month.

  • @violet_broregarde
    @violet_broregarde 4 роки тому +4

    I like how honest you are about your opinion of the deck. You're such a good commentator :D

  • @matthewmcgreal4646
    @matthewmcgreal4646 4 роки тому +2

    I could easily see Ikoria printing a devastating big baddie for this deck

  • @marcagel
    @marcagel 4 роки тому

    I have been brewing some really fun jank with Dubious Challenge and Homeward Path. Works pretty well!

  • @freeejazzz
    @freeejazzz 4 роки тому

    The commentary during the Bant Spirits match is hilarious.

  • @goat666db
    @goat666db 4 роки тому

    So fun. We need the non-budget version of this now

  • @Beefman.0
    @Beefman.0 4 роки тому +2

    Call me crazy, but I can definitely see some version of Dubious Challenge becoming an upper tier deck

  • @RTSK-be2pm
    @RTSK-be2pm 4 роки тому +6

    Ngl, when I saw Dubious Challenge in the title I defaulted to thinking it was an Against the Odds deck until I opened up the vid

  • @DavyMcWavy
    @DavyMcWavy 4 роки тому +6

    I feel like MTGO is broken here because the card says, “Opponents chooses a creature, the rest go under your control”. So how are you getting both creatures of the opponent is supposed to choose one specifically for their control? Edit: after seeing a few opponents actually get their creature, I realize it’s not broken. How the hell do you screw that up? Lol

  • @aarlavaan
    @aarlavaan 4 роки тому

    actually trying to put a dubious challenge deck together. looks super fun!

  • @colecarmichael5724
    @colecarmichael5724 4 роки тому +2

    Everytime you make a dubious challenge deck i dont know why I just get as giddy as a school girl 😂

  • @bradwhiteuk
    @bradwhiteuk 4 роки тому

    You could try Rhonas the Indomitable as your Ferocious enabling 3 drop. Gives you a bit more game if you're drawing all your dorks and no Challenges or Unwrittens too.

  • @AndukeMTGEDH
    @AndukeMTGEDH 4 роки тому +4

    What dose the prompt from the dubious challenge trigger look like? How can someone get it so wrong and just give you both?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +1

      I'm pretty sure you just get a pop up with two creatures and you click on the one you want. It's actually pretty easy :)

  • @Loxim_
    @Loxim_ 4 роки тому

    That first opponent had some... interesting game plans.

  • @thewildmage36
    @thewildmage36 4 роки тому +1

    I clicked as soon as I saw the name of one of my favorite weird cards: dubious challenge

  • @jerrymcdaniel6643
    @jerrymcdaniel6643 4 роки тому +7

    Lol, surprised you haven't tried a inspiring statuary deck yet

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +5

      Ohh, we should do that.

    • @jerrymcdaniel6643
      @jerrymcdaniel6643 4 роки тому

      @@MTGGoldfish totally, there's so much you can use you can even use Fay if wishes and pull it from the sideboard or use Karn you could play eldrazi and started dropping ulamog Turn 5 lol

  • @totalcoward
    @totalcoward 4 роки тому

    Match 5 Game 1 had Seth looking like Druid Tribal

  • @paolomigliorati6141
    @paolomigliorati6141 4 роки тому +3

    I'm a simple man: I see Dubious Challenge, I press Like

  • @FergyB20
    @FergyB20 4 роки тому +1

    Yaaay more dubious challenge!

  • @coreypatrick18
    @coreypatrick18 4 роки тому

    What would you change for a non budget build of this? Temple gardens and better creatures?

  • @trulmbthedire307
    @trulmbthedire307 4 роки тому +1

    Note that trostani yoinks herself back

  • @marshall4439
    @marshall4439 4 роки тому

    At 1:04:30 you chose Elf Elf instead of Prince Prince. Doesn't Prince Prince mean you end up with two princes and a scry 2? Is that not better than both of you getting an elf? Great deck, though. I am definitely playing Dubious Challenge in both Modern and Pioneer now thanks to your videos!

  • @johannesschubert7739
    @johannesschubert7739 4 роки тому

    The art is so on point

  • @elliotthood1719
    @elliotthood1719 4 роки тому +3

    Homeward path is a great land for this deck

  • @stephenhousman6975
    @stephenhousman6975 4 роки тому +1

    30:00 I don't see a Zecama in the deck list do you mean zetalpa?

  • @Afrothoz
    @Afrothoz 4 роки тому

    Z-E-T-A-L-P-A!
    Zacama is a whole different lizard xD

  • @MrTandtrollet
    @MrTandtrollet 4 роки тому +1

    Game 1 if why I hate magic sometime. Opponent playing terribly not reading a single card doing everything wrong. Still manages to win...

  • @WarFan40k
    @WarFan40k 4 роки тому

    I feel like that's the first time I have seen the Bant spirits deck not have the Spell Queller. And not even any of the times.

    • @sutfolsemaj
      @sutfolsemaj 4 роки тому +2

      I feel like there's a secret rule by WotC that says bant spirits can play 12 copies of queller.

  • @riccardocalosso5688
    @riccardocalosso5688 4 роки тому

    Would you consider shock and checklands instead of the non basic you use an upgrade overall?

  • @DarkX64
    @DarkX64 4 роки тому

    I'm curious what the upgraded version would look like. I loved dub challenge in modern, and it looks even better in here where there is a bit less broken shit to mess up it's day.

    • @Krossfyre
      @Krossfyre 4 роки тому

      Maybe Fabled Passages, some shocks? Maybe Gilded Goose? Or Sylvan Caryatids, those are like 7 dollars a pop. In a deck like this it might be better to just go with beefier blockers because resolving a threat overwhelms them and eliminates the need for chip damage to kill most of the time.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      Mostly you get better mana and some upgraded finishers (like Emrakul the Promised End and Ulamog the Ceaseless Hunger).

  • @bakyra4683
    @bakyra4683 4 роки тому

    Hey Seth! On the last game, could you not have used princes to reset the counters on the big things? this for sure wins more time than double elves!

    • @michaelwatt291
      @michaelwatt291 4 роки тому +1

      No he cant. Prince is weird because of it saying "creature you own" instead or "creature you control" allowing it to work with dubious challenge, but you otherwise cant target opponents stuff with it, just creatures you "own"

  • @imcohencohen
    @imcohencohen 4 роки тому

    Also, would you say this has an edges over GR rhythm monsters? Having playing challenge in pioneer I can say it is a lot riskier

  • @clyr8386
    @clyr8386 4 роки тому

    Seth, if you were to make this not budget, what would you change/upgrade?

  • @imcohencohen
    @imcohencohen 4 роки тому +2

    23:18 Beard-Scratching ASMR

  • @moontorment
    @moontorment 4 роки тому +1

    Would gideon of the trials be a good sodeboard option, its on curve and shutsdown unfair combos

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      I've been playing Gideon's Intervention in the sideboard slot to fight unfair decks, but Gideon of the Trials is good there too.

  • @Suprschwizr
    @Suprschwizr 4 роки тому +1

    Looks like i have a new favourite Pioneer Deck xD when do you play a nonbudget Version for a League?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      I'm down with playing it some more (with upgrades), I think it's actually pretty decent.

  • @kartoffelnpommesgut
    @kartoffelnpommesgut 4 роки тому

    What would you change for the nonbudget version? Better Eldrazi?

  • @flossedinparadise1759
    @flossedinparadise1759 4 роки тому

    Seth, am I wrong in thinking that the "double Charming Prince" scenarios were still not bad? Since u would have gotten both anyway? It was an option both times I saw you wiff and it did not seem to be on your radar. asking for a friend. I don't have friends rn btw.
    thanks
    thanks

  • @Jshmoor
    @Jshmoor 4 роки тому

    Zetalpa is very different from Zacama, Seth we love you

  • @shanehof1022
    @shanehof1022 4 роки тому +1

    LETS GO DUBIOUS CHALLENGE

  • @R3ach4Th3Sky
    @R3ach4Th3Sky 4 роки тому

    I was in an 8-man draft pod that had 5 dubious challenges in it. Very, very odd

  • @Uzotrups
    @Uzotrups 4 роки тому

    I get so sad that my boy Zetalpa doesn't get the respect he deserves..."a strong lizard?? Must be Zacama, I will call it Zacama just in case "

  • @tomssadovskis607
    @tomssadovskis607 4 роки тому

    41:50 Is it possible to gift play points? Could opponent give 5 play points just to throw you off?

  • @sorafowler4497
    @sorafowler4497 4 роки тому +3

    If Oracle gets banned, this might be a tier 2 deck. Maybe tier 1

  • @Nrdyco
    @Nrdyco 4 роки тому +2

    Okay.. Why did you wait to take the dmg before using the seal away? Why not just use it on attack before blockers are announced so you're not taking the dmg..

    • @VargonDraxar
      @VargonDraxar 4 роки тому +1

      I think the mindset was to hope the opponent tapped out in second main phase to guarantee that the seal away resolves

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +2

      Yeah, that was the main hope.

  • @colby3896
    @colby3896 4 роки тому

    Opponent game one was probably thinking “dubious challenge is basically just a better, sorcery speed CoCo...”

  • @Drrgy
    @Drrgy 4 роки тому

    What would the non-budget version of the deck look like? Just a better manabase or some other changes aswell?

    • @Torty007
      @Torty007 4 роки тому

      Take a look at the description 😉

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      There's a list in the article. It's mostly better mana, some different finishers (like an Emrakul and an Ulamog) and some sideboard changes. www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/budget-magic-dubious-challenge-pioneer

  • @joelputon3756
    @joelputon3756 4 роки тому

    I'm new to mtg so sorry if it is a stupid question. If my oponent choses a creature to summon and one is left for me, he does summon it first. Does the effect of the creature putted in the battlefield (when summoning does this or that) resolve before i summon my creature, or i summon right away putting the effects on a stack causing my creature effect to come first?

    • @somedudeontheinterwebs45
      @somedudeontheinterwebs45 3 роки тому

      Both creatures enter the battlefield at the same time. That’s why Charming Prince can flicker the creature the opponent takes.

  • @imakuni67
    @imakuni67 4 роки тому

    Was that Bant Spirits player also drinking spirits?

  • @zasshulad2619
    @zasshulad2619 4 роки тому

    Seth I have a jund build of See the Unwritten with DL Kolhagan and Atarka world render to 24 an opponent the turn you cast See the Unwritten. If you'd like a look.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      Nice! Do you have a list?

    • @zasshulad2619
      @zasshulad2619 4 роки тому

      @@MTGGoldfish List currently is kinda jank as I don't frequently build non commander decks but I figured playing the thoughtsize kill your stuff plan was better than the lanowar elves plan.
      Anyway here is the list: www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2846713#paper

  • @KebbieG
    @KebbieG 4 роки тому

    For Modern? You mean Pioneer right Seth?

  • @brunnun
    @brunnun 4 роки тому

    Am I the only one that is mad Wizards made Zetalpa and the blue one "dinosaur" type when the animals they are based on are not dinosaurs?

  • @dirtydeeds4free553
    @dirtydeeds4free553 4 роки тому +2

    Anyone else watch seth at 2 times speed while drinking vodka? Corona is also eggceptable

    • @Bobal27
      @Bobal27 4 роки тому +2

      No! Stay away from the Corona! Wash your hands, and don’t talk to anyone! Oh, and I prefer 1.75 with my vodka.

  • @TheBigPenguu
    @TheBigPenguu 4 роки тому

    "Zacama."
    Zetalpa.
    "Zacama."
    ZeTALpa
    "Zacama."
    ZETALPA
    "Zacama."
    ZEEEETAAAALPAAAAA

  • @kashiffarees881
    @kashiffarees881 4 роки тому

    I wonder if it's possible to play this type of deck in commander. Just make friends with someone and let them hold on to your creatures until it's down to 2v2 and then just taking it all back.

    • @infinitedm5396
      @infinitedm5396 4 роки тому +1

      Just run Trostani as your commander, and Dubious Challenge all day erryday

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      It's a lot harder in Commander just because you only have one copy of Dubious Challenge, so your odds of drawing it aren't that high. Dubious Challenge probably is good if Trostani is your Commander though.

  • @messypeter397
    @messypeter397 4 роки тому

    Jeez those 2 first opponents were........im sure they tried their best

  • @tbomb5016
    @tbomb5016 3 роки тому

    How would you update this without a budget and with new cards?

    • @somedudeontheinterwebs45
      @somedudeontheinterwebs45 3 роки тому

      Shocklands, better/more efficient dubious challenge targets (maybe emrakul/ulamog), better sideboard and manabase.

  • @aretwodeetoo1181
    @aretwodeetoo1181 4 роки тому

    Opponents are dubiously challenged 😂

  • @klowngaming4507
    @klowngaming4507 4 роки тому

    why no eldrazi displacer?

  • @juancobos8724
    @juancobos8724 4 роки тому

    good video men!

  • @foxyr4bbit
    @foxyr4bbit 4 роки тому +1

    magicman420 was probably just really high

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      That would explain some of the choices :)

  • @Optimator7
    @Optimator7 4 роки тому

    54:12 Those aren't houses those are cathedrals. 15/15

  • @edanlove3031
    @edanlove3031 4 роки тому

    sylvan caryatid for paradise druid

  • @miketate3445
    @miketate3445 4 роки тому +2

    Dubious opponent...

  • @KingNothing191
    @KingNothing191 4 роки тому +1

    I shifted the likes from 420 to 421. I'M SORRY SETH!

  • @Tobi1Kanobi93
    @Tobi1Kanobi93 4 роки тому

    This deck seems busted until the opponents read what dubious challenge actually does.

  • @kallinblackburn717
    @kallinblackburn717 4 роки тому

    Zetalpa Seth not zacama. Silly seth

  • @jackpabich763
    @jackpabich763 4 роки тому

    Seth. Zetalpa. NOT Zecama. Different Dino

  • @spacekrill
    @spacekrill 4 роки тому

    "Zacama"

  • @FergyB20
    @FergyB20 4 роки тому

    Zetalpa no zacama

  • @bastienclarke1810
    @bastienclarke1810 3 роки тому

    Fun

  • @blueredlover1060
    @blueredlover1060 4 роки тому

    I came to watch Pioneer, his boards say not quite modern.

  • @weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee360
    @weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee360 4 роки тому

    Ze-tal-pa

  • @alexmaragh7766
    @alexmaragh7766 4 роки тому

    ZEPLALTA NOT ZECAMA you have disrespected my son Seth, he is best massive random beater

  • @noofdavy
    @noofdavy 4 роки тому +1

    Outside of magic zero is not even, so it needs to be specified.

    • @alexb9677
      @alexb9677 4 роки тому

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity_of_zero

  • @sorafowler4497
    @sorafowler4497 4 роки тому +1

    ZELTAPA, ZELTAPA, NOT ZACAMA, ZELTAPA

    • @Bobal27
      @Bobal27 4 роки тому +3

      It’s Zetalpa, I’m only correcting you since you’ve now set your autocorrect incorrectly if you’re on mobile. But I agree with the sentiment, COME ON, SETH!

  • @jessievohsen6686
    @jessievohsen6686 4 роки тому

    Eventually your gonna have to stop saying "better known as saffronolive"

    • @Kurogetsu1
      @Kurogetsu1 4 роки тому +2

      To be fair, he says "probably better known as" which means it isn't necessarily true

    • @TheQueerLeaf99
      @TheQueerLeaf99 4 роки тому

      Heh

    • @SabeJones
      @SabeJones 4 роки тому +2

      Didn't he try that once? The comments had a fit.

  • @ishimarumakot0
    @ishimarumakot0 4 роки тому

    Reading cards is too hard.