It seems like it's improving latency when you're GPU limited (hence AMD testing at 4k with max settings), and being GPU limited is known to impact latency.
i have a 7800x3d and a 7700xt which means i'm GPU limited. i'm a faceit lvl 10 player and i don't feel any difference.. kinda feels worse, but could be the game since it feels bad either way
AMD created a feature that benefits only single player games 😳so while not universally a benefit 🤯it still has a benefit for some……. like me who is a single player gamer 🙂↕😉
It only helps in GPU bound scenarios, where the GPU buffers multiple frames. This most often happens when the GPU hits 96-100% usage, depending on the game. Turning on anti lag will reduce the frame buffer, so there will always be 1 frame max buffered, so the CPU always can deliver frames the fastest to the GPU without the GPU having to halt.
I love that AMD's "turn down settings" anti-lag feature is open source! They are absolute legends! :) Terrific video as always, and thanks for all the effort you put into these. Also great to see your amazing latency tester being put to such good use!
CS2 FPS Benchmark New AMD or PRO Edition 22.Q4/24.Q2 driver - higher frames per second, more stable and better latency despite in-game FPS limits to refresh the monitor. Red drivers are still bad for CS2
OMG THIS IS why my csgo2 feels super laggy after update..disabled it and won all games after loss all the time, DIDN'T EVEN KNOW IT WAS ON!! Horrible for csgo2 feels like it lags for 0,5 sec before shooting /enemy peaking *with anti lag 2.0 on!!
Errr...not actually. Any high end gpu can get 400-500 FPS on CS2 even on 1440p. Mostly of the time you are CPU bound in CS 2 with a 7900XT/XTX or 4080 Super/4090.
@@victorromano4889 I know you are CPU bound, but nobody is running 1440p in any kind of competitive scene for a reason. There are still benefits to playing in 1080p for the competitive scene.
@@victorromano4889 Who the hell is buying those GPUs? nonetheless there is still a benefit to 1080p gaming in competitive scenarios, whether the CPU is your primary bottleneck or not. For the same reason settings are turned down in competitive gameplay despite being CPU limited. CPU bottlenecks and vice versa are not a linear phenomenon and we tend to talk like they are in the non competitive scene world. I am very much CPU bottlenecked in Valorant and still get a good fps boost in 1080p.
@@victorromano4889 For the same reason you can be CPU limited and upgrade GPUs all the way up the stack and still get fps gains and performance improvements, albeit not as dramatic.
@@MartinMlBanic most people play 1280x960 also pro players. I mean who play on high res and care about latency? People that care about it play low res so this video need to be executed on low res. Sorry for my English
It seems like it's improving latency when you're GPU limited (hence AMD testing at 4k with max settings), and being GPU limited is known to impact latency.
i have a 7800x3d and a 7700xt which means i'm GPU limited. i'm a faceit lvl 10 player and i don't feel any difference.. kinda feels worse, but could be the game since it feels bad either way
@@azo0ownz i have 99% sure u dont have GPU Limited...maybe u dont know what is that mean
@@azo0ownz u're NOT GPU limited
@@patstr96 pretty sure i am when the GPU is maxed out at 99%/100% usage
AMD created a feature that benefits only single player games 😳so while not universally a benefit 🤯it still has a benefit for some……. like me who is a single player gamer 🙂↕😉
I would love to see you test this on professional player settings, 1280x960 res, which is what most pro players use.
It only helps in GPU bound scenarios, where the GPU buffers multiple frames. This most often happens when the GPU hits 96-100% usage, depending on the game.
Turning on anti lag will reduce the frame buffer, so there will always be 1 frame max buffered, so the CPU always can deliver frames the fastest to the GPU without the GPU having to halt.
Very informative as always. Great content keep up the amazing work
Thank you for this video!
I love that AMD's "turn down settings" anti-lag feature is open source! They are absolute legends! :)
Terrific video as always, and thanks for all the effort you put into these. Also great to see your amazing latency tester being put to such good use!
except you get to keep the good graphics...
Can confirm game feels almost 2x more responsive, I hit shots more often and can't feel any lag whatsoever
the real question for your statement is: what is Your gpu? :) And how much frames You get?
@@patstr96 7800xt, I get around 300fps on highest settings.
Did u turn it off
In summary for cs2 if You have good GPU turn everything OFF, if Your gpu is weak and You're playing on 100fps or something similar then turn this ON.
CS2 FPS Benchmark New AMD or PRO Edition 22.Q4/24.Q2 driver - higher frames per second, more stable and better latency despite in-game FPS limits to refresh the monitor.
Red drivers are still bad for CS2
OMG THIS IS why my csgo2 feels super laggy after update..disabled it and won all games after loss all the time, DIDN'T EVEN KNOW IT WAS ON!! Horrible for csgo2 feels like it lags for 0,5 sec before shooting /enemy peaking *with anti lag 2.0 on!!
Will this improve inout lag games like apex legends and fortnite
So you get the same low latency WITHOUT the need to hinder the graphics and you find it laughable?
your videos are the best
Testing CS2 in 1440p is absurd as it defeats the entire premise of fps gaming and latency reduction...
Errr...not actually. Any high end gpu can get 400-500 FPS on CS2 even on 1440p. Mostly of the time you are CPU bound in CS 2 with a 7900XT/XTX or 4080 Super/4090.
@@victorromano4889 I know you are CPU bound, but nobody is running 1440p in any kind of competitive scene for a reason. There are still benefits to playing in 1080p for the competitive scene.
@@victorromano4889 Who the hell is buying those GPUs? nonetheless there is still a benefit to 1080p gaming in competitive scenarios, whether the CPU is your primary bottleneck or not. For the same reason settings are turned down in competitive gameplay despite being CPU limited. CPU bottlenecks and vice versa are not a linear phenomenon and we tend to talk like they are in the non competitive scene world. I am very much CPU bottlenecked in Valorant and still get a good fps boost in 1080p.
@@victorromano4889 For the same reason you can be CPU limited and upgrade GPUs all the way up the stack and still get fps gains and performance improvements, albeit not as dramatic.
Definitely seems like a feature designed to just make up for the increased latency from frame generation
can someone on this internet understand that people should benchmark in 1280x960 / 1650x1050 / no one plays 2560x1440p -_-
I use 1440:1080 instead lmao
@@MartinMlBanic most people play 1280x960 also pro players. I mean who play on high res and care about latency? People that care about it play low res so this video need to be executed on low res. Sorry for my English
as always with amd: promising feature that was released without much polishing and with a weird game choice. looking forward to fsr 3.1 now
Lower res to 1080p, dont worry about al2
Who plays comp games high res ?
Alt+shift+L tells u the latency too
1440p gang
900p lone wolf here
Here@@rubenel7993