Damn I never thought I'd see nearly 22gb of vram used in a game... I'm using an old 1080ti with 11gb and once it's maxed out the game hitches and stutters like CRAZY You don't run into that issue with the 4090 at all do you!?
@@Shishaholiker I know my hardware is old, but even in the game settings it says if you run out of RAM the game will begin stuttering and hitching...which when my 1080ti RAM allocation gets to 10,500 and above is exactly what starts to happen so it must be hitting that ceiling. Which card do you have and do you see any of these issues on the larger maps like these?
@@tonybailey89 Im using a 4090 and 7950x. no stutters at all. What is your CPU? Instrad of allocating 10,5gb VRAM, try allocating 8-9 only. So set the value in settings to 70 or something. That might result in better performance. The reason for this is that your gpu runs out of memory for other tasks/windows.
@@Shishaholiker on that GPU utilization or allocation slider, yep lower overall framrate is better than a giant hitch causing me to loose a gunfight I could have won lol smh
Are you playing on 4K monitor or are you just playing 2k resolution I’ve noticed on my 4090 if I go to 4K I get an average of 133 but if I put it to 2500 resolution, I get something like 180 190 fps. Oh, the only difference on my computer is I am running a inte; i9 10900kf prossesor. I’ll think later on I’ll upgrade to the same processor you have.
@@jonestown1978 Bro, here I am getting 60-80 fps with my gtx 1650, i5 10300H at high settings(normal textures, and shadow at low) 1080p, and here you are desperate to get even more than 190 fps wtf
almost like they planned on putting raytracing in but said fuck it cause it causes to many issues for their engine but keep the upscalers in, im near 80+fps at 4k with dlaa max settings no need to upscale
Pretty sure he locked that CPU speed at 5.5 ghz using control panel or some external software. No CPU can run at a locked speed like that unless you lock it manually and use a very powerful cooling system so as to not melt it down.
Can anyone tell me. So I have an ultra wide monitor 34 inch. I play on PC. Tonight I was messing with the game settings and feel like I messed something up. So when I’m actually playing the game it takes up the whole entire screen which is what I want. But when I’m on the main menu it’s cut off on the left and right and those areas are black… is that how it’s always been? I coulda sworn the menu took up my entire screen before I messed with the settings but I could be totally wrong. I know it’s not a big issue but it’s been bugging me lol
Ahh man, when i start warzone firstly my settings are completely wrong, then i start a round and its just lagging af. I hate it so much idk why because i have my settings low.
Seriously? You can complain about performance and how the graphics to gamplay ratio is bad as even the gtx 1050 2gb which was performing ready welll with warzone which has 90 % of the graphics but 2x the performance but the graphics ar3 still good though But you vomplain about graphics
@@_mariko791 not only did you fail to read and understand what I had to say, you twisted my words too. I clearly stated "if I HAVE this kind of setup" and "I'M NOT wasting it's potential." It should be crystal clear from these statements that I prefer single player games over WZ2, cause the servers for CoD are in a bad state, there are gameplay issues etc. That is MY opinion. Second, I never hated on the guy who is demonstrating how WZ2 looks like on a high end system. Never did I once discourage the person from doing so. It's his system, his choice. Please read properly before trying to be an internet messiah.
@@AJ-qs4vw it's kinda my bad that i didn't fully read your comment but it's still not called "wasting it's potential" since warzone is quite a heavy game specially when ran at 4k so yeah If i had a 4090 i would also play a lot of single player titles but I wont comment on someone benchmarking the card and say "i won't waste it's potential" Also in what way did I twist your words lol
@@_mariko791 @_Mariko by "wasting it's potential" I meant it's not a good game to be playing, again, I find it has many issues, the base animation speeds in game are slow, everything feels clunky, the servers are bad, and I would rather go back to play single player titles over WZ2, cause it's arguably in a bad state. I know it consumes a lot of system resources, but that is not my point. I don't consider WZ2 to be a good game for me to play it especially IF I owned a high end system. So this is what I meant by "wasting it's potential." It's a ME thing. I hope you understood it clearly now. In no way, shape or form am I insulting the person who is just demonstrating how it runs when you have the best PC on the planet. Again, it was just my personal opinion. And I just typed it and left a comment. Good for you that you won't go around leaving comments like this, but this is my opinion and I simply said what was on my mind. And that too in a non aggressive manner. So I don't really understand what exactly are you being mad about. And when I said you're twisting my words, you said "let people play the game they want" implying that I am being an asshole, and I am hating on the person just because he's playing a game I dislike. That is the picture you were painting of me. It's pretty clear what you were trying to do, intentionally or unintentionally, that is what your statement implies. English Language my friend.
You guys are the same people telling me there's a climate problem, the ones using nuclear gaming PC's and shopping at Ikea ?. Massive fail brah. Get yourself a Amish made gaming desk, those last forever and it's better for the environment because we can plant new trees.
A Pc can do a whole lot more than play games. Also the rendering on warzone, and visual quality at longer ranges is way better than a console. Wouldn’t consider the very high end Pc a waste of money when you can play almost every game at 4k maxed out with 100 plus fps. Also certain games like warzone are horribly optimized, and textures will look bad regardless. Not on the machine that’s on the devs. I would do research before saying a 4090 i9 13900k pc is a waste of money. The series X is a waste of money because a mid range pc outperforms these new gen consoles like a breeze Lol
Wow game is optomized badly. On the small Ashika Island map you get average FPS of 130 FPS which cant even run a 144 Hz monitor. Terrible optomization from Activision.
As always awesome gameplay brother 🔥.
Damn I never thought I'd see nearly 22gb of vram used in a game... I'm using an old 1080ti with 11gb and once it's maxed out the game hitches and stutters like CRAZY
You don't run into that issue with the 4090 at all do you!?
Its just the allocated vram, it's not actually being used.
@@Shishaholiker I know my hardware is old, but even in the game settings it says if you run out of RAM the game will begin stuttering and hitching...which when my 1080ti RAM allocation gets to 10,500 and above is exactly what starts to happen so it must be hitting that ceiling.
Which card do you have and do you see any of these issues on the larger maps like these?
@@tonybailey89 Im using a 4090 and 7950x. no stutters at all. What is your CPU? Instrad of allocating 10,5gb VRAM, try allocating 8-9 only. So set the value in settings to 70 or something. That might result in better performance. The reason for this is that your gpu runs out of memory for other tasks/windows.
thats exactly what i did in warzone 1 with a 6700xt. lower values left more headroom for other tasks which resulted in more performance-
@@Shishaholiker on that GPU utilization or allocation slider, yep lower overall framrate is better than a giant hitch causing me to loose a gunfight I could have won lol smh
Awesome gameplay bro , also i like your videos , love you brodahhhhh ♥♥
My i7 13700k has a much lower temp (combined with a gigabyte 4090) and get higher overall FPS. Glad i choose that over the 13900k.
wow the cpu in this video is super hot tbh it's probably fixable with better cooling tho
i have the 13900k and a 3070 im getting 160-170 fps all settings on high....im not sure why this guy was getting such low fps
@@prozack9225No dlss
@@prozack9225 high isnt max, no dlss, and 4k
@@vyruss6709 pretty sure there isn't an option for max they just go to high
I use a quantum computer to play Warzone, bro. Needs a nuclear power grid, to gun that game at Infinity fps.
My pc started to overheat while watching this video in 4k
God damn ! I wish I can play like that
noice gameplay 🔥🔥. Also the purple skin looks nice....
Cool rig but what monitor you running bruh
I overclock mine +100 on gpu,+1000mem, power limit133%, gpu voltage 100%.....REALLY RUNS GREAT
I feel like u are trying to fly to heaven...
How do I set up the benchmark settings exactly like you with msi + rivatuner ? what options.
Found it out myself, you can edit the text on the navigation, what you want to enable :)
Minha placa de video até esquentou apenas de ver este video.
beautiful move in I LIKED IT TOO MUCH
Which monitor you using?
ASUS ROG Strix 27” 4K HDR 144Hz DSC Gaming Monitor
@@GTX1050TiFireflyGaming ty ty
Is this with raytracing on or off?
Lol, there is no raytracing in this game.
What HDMI and have you thought about purchasing a 990 PRO?
yea, i run 150-160 no problem at 4k with a 7900xtx
Are you playing on 4K monitor or are you just playing 2k resolution I’ve noticed on my 4090 if I go to 4K I get an average of 133 but if I put it to 2500 resolution, I get something like 180 190 fps. Oh, the only difference on my computer is I am running a inte; i9 10900kf prossesor. I’ll think later on I’ll upgrade to the same processor you have.
Is what you have now not good enough lol?
@@RzVids it’s good but good can be better.
@@jonestown1978 Bro, here I am getting 60-80 fps with my gtx 1650, i5 10300H at high settings(normal textures, and shadow at low) 1080p, and here you are desperate to get even more than 190 fps wtf
Super Gameplay
Teammate is knocked
GTX 1050Ti: inspecting looted weapon lol
you have a good PC with potato aim but nice gameplay bro
What were those 3 white dots that surrounded the enemy at 2:29? Also showed range also. It’s not the the reticle from the site either soooooo
Poor me, I play it on a phone on only 10 fps 😂😂 And make accuracy the most important thing that there is no difference between trees and plants
si hay algo que no me gusta de los warzone como la pantallas esta llena de letras enemigos remarcados le quita lo inmersivo del juego
I wish I could play it on max😢😢
bros 1% lows are higher then my avg 💀
How do you get 130fps on 4k? I have a 4080 and on 4k i can only do 80-90 fps if so
Mem Reduct, ISLC, MSI AFTERBURNER, CPU CONTROL
It's 4090 and i9 13900k 😂
bruh, a 4090 is 3x better than a 4080. Sorry to break it to you. But 80-90 fps is 200% enough to play the game and win it too.
1:03 Is that all u got?
4090 130fps is okej?? i see streamers at 240+?, the game Always have problem with fps
his CPU is on fire, look at temps
raise your digital vibe in nvid to make the colors pop out more
What are your graphics settings in the Quality tab?
ultra, as the video suggests
So like, 99 FPS for the big map in 4k?
I use i9-12900hx+rtx3080ti laptop to play this game
Yo dude you cool
whats the build of this pc ?
I wonder how much would the fps be at 1080p ? Thanks for the video, enjoy the most powerfull gpu in the world, congrats.
If your running 1080p you don’t need to spend $2000 on a graphics card
@@Larimuss True, but it was just for curiosity.
@@Larimuss guess your name makes sense after all.
It would probably get bottlenecked by the CPU at that point.
@@jadarhiwilliams8286 LoooL yep i gess.
Blud got the nasa pc
almost like they planned on putting raytracing in but said fuck it cause it causes to many issues for their engine but keep the upscalers in, im near 80+fps at 4k with dlaa max settings no need to upscale
nice snipes lol
Whats the name of that purple camo?
why my warzone graphics is so blurry
looks like my old rtx 6600 tbh
Counter strike Francaise is the real fps game created for everyone. Other fps games are marketing for graphics card and only rich people plays
The poors are posting on UA-cam again...
Every Dad's opinions :
@@rogerdelacruz7551 are they supposed to not post or be able to have an opinion lil bro?
Warzone is free to play dude, even valorant and it does not even require a expensive gpu
Many low-income people pay their computer or console in installments, you can buy another card too, mine is an rx6600m with xeon kit
overkill
this game looks like from 1999
Pretty good graphics for a game from 1999😂
Is there a Ranked mode in Warzone 2.0?
yes
You should upgrade to the 5090ti, this card sucks!
Bro Please Upload more of Call of Duty
That CPU is cookin' 🔥
I mean it is at 5.5 ghz constantly
Pretty sure he locked that CPU speed at 5.5 ghz using control panel or some external software. No CPU can run at a locked speed like that unless you lock it manually and use a very powerful cooling system so as to not melt it down.
how much ur pc costs?
Always surprised me😅😊
Can anyone tell me. So I have an ultra wide monitor 34 inch. I play on PC. Tonight I was messing with the game settings and feel like I messed something up. So when I’m actually playing the game it takes up the whole entire screen which is what I want. But when I’m on the main menu it’s cut off on the left and right and those areas are black… is that how it’s always been? I coulda sworn the menu took up my entire screen before I messed with the settings but I could be totally wrong. I know it’s not a big issue but it’s been bugging me lol
does anyone know when warzone mobile will be released??
I wish to play warzone
looks like ps5
more 500 watts of power consumption my god, so expensive for just play video game
I play in these settings, I like it
Ahh man, when i start warzone firstly my settings are completely wrong, then i start a round and its just lagging af. I hate it so much idk why because i have my settings low.
You need a good GPU, 8 GB DDR4 dual channel RAM(minimum for a smooth gameplay), a CPU which does not bottleneck your GPU, SSD, and not an HDD
play in bloodstrike as you play in warzone 😢
how much for your pc type
Still look bad even when it’s max
youtube looks bad even at 4k
2160p is not 4k
Oh sry idk that
Ashika looks pretty colorful gotta disagree
Seriously? You can complain about performance and how the graphics to gamplay ratio is bad as even the gtx 1050 2gb which was performing ready welll with warzone which has 90 % of the graphics but 2x the performance but the graphics ar3 still good though
But you vomplain about graphics
Looks exactly like on Xbox Series X, and that only costs 500 usd
Pls make a gameplay video on chrome dinosaur in RTX4090 AND INTEL I9 13900k😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
ez win
Time to change channel's name 🙂
I want you to play Escape from Tarkov in full quality
CPU matters more in that game. I agree though.
cpu temperature is very high
i have the same CPU, the same MB but my ram is blocked at 4000 T-T
if I have a 4090 i9 13th PC, I'm not wasting it's potential on WZ2, imma jump straight on to single player titles
it's not really called "wasting it's potential" come on man let people play the game they want with the card they can afford
campaign is crazy, that will put it to the test
@@_mariko791 not only did you fail to read and understand what I had to say, you twisted my words too. I clearly stated "if I HAVE this kind of setup" and "I'M NOT wasting it's potential." It should be crystal clear from these statements that I prefer single player games over WZ2, cause the servers for CoD are in a bad state, there are gameplay issues etc. That is MY opinion.
Second, I never hated on the guy who is demonstrating how WZ2 looks like on a high end system. Never did I once discourage the person from doing so. It's his system, his choice.
Please read properly before trying to be an internet messiah.
@@AJ-qs4vw it's kinda my bad that i didn't fully read your comment but it's still not called "wasting it's potential" since warzone is quite a heavy game specially when ran at 4k so yeah
If i had a 4090 i would also play a lot of single player titles but I wont comment on someone benchmarking the card and say "i won't waste it's potential"
Also in what way did I twist your words lol
@@_mariko791 @_Mariko by "wasting it's potential" I meant it's not a good game to be playing, again, I find it has many issues, the base animation speeds in game are slow, everything feels clunky, the servers are bad, and I would rather go back to play single player titles over WZ2, cause it's arguably in a bad state.
I know it consumes a lot of system resources, but that is not my point. I don't consider WZ2 to be a good game for me to play it especially IF I owned a high end system. So this is what I meant by "wasting it's potential." It's a ME thing. I hope you understood it clearly now.
In no way, shape or form am I insulting the person who is just demonstrating how it runs when you have the best PC on the planet. Again, it was just my personal opinion. And I just typed it and left a comment. Good for you that you won't go around leaving comments like this, but this is my opinion and I simply said what was on my mind. And that too in a non aggressive manner. So I don't really understand what exactly are you being mad about.
And when I said you're twisting my words, you said "let people play the game they want" implying that I am being an asshole, and I am hating on the person just because he's playing a game I dislike. That is the picture you were painting of me. It's pretty clear what you were trying to do, intentionally or unintentionally, that is what your statement implies.
English Language my friend.
Runs well considering how shit the optimization is on this game too. Too bad the card costs more than a car.
You guys are the same people telling me there's a climate problem, the ones using nuclear gaming PC's and shopping at Ikea ?.
Massive fail brah. Get yourself a Amish made gaming desk, those last forever and it's better for the environment because we can plant new trees.
Pity it takes a 4090, games are horribly optimized
Nice but now a test with a real video game plz.
HOW?????I HAVE RTX 4090 I 9 10900KF AND I GET 110 FPS WITH DLSS ON 3840X1440
every thumbnail the same.. creative content you got here...
hhh nice
Hmm, weird, my xtx is averaging 145 fps
How do you have 5000 likes with such low views??!
Wooow... how'd you get so much bots?
0:42 😧
I have rtx 4090 suprim x and i9 13900k i have 200 fps in ashika island full setting extrem for 2k and dlss off
4th like
why only 130 fps? :(
He doesnt know his ram is slow
2:50 bad ass mf
**GTX 1050 TI**
No es por nada pero se ve igual que en Xbox serie s
Wuthering type of bottlenecking am I witnessing
My series X looks just as good. What a waste of money.
A Pc can do a whole lot more than play games. Also the rendering on warzone, and visual quality at longer ranges is way better than a console. Wouldn’t consider the very high end Pc a waste of money when you can play almost every game at 4k maxed out with 100 plus fps. Also certain games like warzone are horribly optimized, and textures will look bad regardless. Not on the machine that’s on the devs. I would do research before saying a 4090 i9 13900k pc is a waste of money. The series X is a waste of money because a mid range pc outperforms these new gen consoles like a breeze Lol
Wow game is optomized badly. On the small Ashika Island map you get average FPS of 130 FPS which cant even run a 144 Hz monitor. Terrible optomization from Activision.
Warzone > 2.0
I play 5k on extreme graphics at neatly 200 fps deal on
Dlss
thats slow , i have 300 fps on 5k
This graphis is the same for the 1080p
hay
This is how RTX 4090 gameplay should be, because it's a waste if you play so dumb on God machines.
COD really just doesn't care about graphics lol
Call of Duty : Warzone 2 RTX 4090 😐😐😐
7483748374837847384738743784738489329832 Hi all. Breathe air. To life. God made everything. His son, Jesus, pardoned all wrongs.
первый
Too much cutting, ruined the gameplay
minha gt730 fazia melhor
The pity is this game is crap. Bring back true cod. Not this live matchmaking bullc r a p.