❤❤ सबसे पहले मैं भार्गव सर का चरण स्पर्श करना चाहूंगा क्या एक्सपीरियंस है वाह सर जी मजा आ गया सुनकर के मैं सोच रहा हूं आप मेरे टीचर होते तो मै दुनिया का सबसे बेहतरीन वकील होता मैं यह लेक्चर खाना खाते समय सुन रहा था लेकिन लेक्चर सुनते सुनते कब लेक्चर खत्म हो गया मुझे पता ही नहीं चल खाना ठंडा हो गया था मैं फिर से गर्म करके खाना खाया हूं ईश्वर से प्रार्थना है कि भार्गव सर की आयु लंबी हो और वह हम सब को इसी तरह से मार्गदर्शन करते रहें जय श्री❤❤
आदरणीय Bhargav sirji & MJ.sirji aapko mera सादर pranam🙏🏻🙏🏻 sirji yh lecture bhut hi स्पष्टORसरल sabdo me smzhaya aap gurujano ne..or bhut hi important knowledge diya..sirji aap gurujano ka bhut bhut dhanywad🙏🏻🙏🏻apki last CJ inrvw ki studnt SUSHILA BAGHEL🎓
माननीय सर समीलात भुमि पिता मां और 4 बचचे कि उम्र 15-13-11-9साल है के नाम पर है उक्त सम्पत्ती पिता अकेले सम्पत्ती को 57-58-59 जुबानी रहन रखा मगर पंजीयन में बिक्री नामा लिखा है! और उस बिक्री नामा 57-58-59 में सभी बच्चे का नाम लिखा है हस्ताक्षर सिर्फ पिता ने( अ )किया है। क्या ये बच्चे का सम्मति में हनन हुआं या नहीं ! इसका जवाब देने कि मेहरबानी करें।( 2) केश 1975 दर्ज में हुआं। की मैं( अ )उक्त सम्पत्ती रहन रखा था मगर( ब)उसने नियत खरब कर हडपन चाहता है ।केश एस डी एम से अ के पक्ष में हुआं मगर कलेक्टर ने ब के पक्ष में पलट दिया ।।केश चलते चलते अ ने अपनी सहयता के लिए अपने दोस्त से कहां आप मुझे साथ दें सामने वाला ब दबंग है दोस्त तैयार हो गया और पुनः केश चलते चलते दोस्त( स) ने 1984-88-89 मे विश्वास में लेकर 18,4 एकड़ का 3भाग में बिक्री पंजीयन करा लिया उसमें भी हस्ताक्षर सिर्फ पिता ने किया । फिर केश चलते चलते दोस्त ने भी सम्पत्ति हड़प लिया है और केश के चलते चलते अ का देहांत 1991, और ब का देहांत 1987 -स का देहान्त 2010 और अ के बच्चे का देहांत 1984-2012-एव 2016 में हुआं । है क्या इस सम्पूर्ण सम्पत्ति में उन 15-13-111-09साल केबच्चों का हनन हुआं है या नहीं जो 1957 58-59मे 3भाग में पंजीयन पिता ने किया है करता वाद चलते चलते पुनः वाद भुमि का पंजीकरण हों सकता है और क्या एक 80-82साल का बुजुर्ग बैगर अपने बच्चों कि सहमति से पंजीयन कर सकते हैं इसका जवाब देने कि मेहरबानी करें मेरा वाट्सएप नम्बर 8817166277
Sir can you please start session for UPPCSJ preparation it will be very helpful for us who cannot afford coachings please sir... You are a very good teacher..
RESPECTED SIR, APKE DWARA SHURU KI GAI YE VIDEO SERIES OR EPISODE, WITH THE HELP OF 30 YEAR EXPERIENCED MAN IS VERY USEFUL FOR US SIR KRIPIYA APP ISE ESE HI JARI RAKHE OR HUM BACHO KO SAHI RAH OR SAHI SAMJH LAW KE BARE ME DETE RHE, APP NHI JANTE KITNE KAMJOR BACHO SAKSHAM KRTE JA RHE HAI. THANK YOU SIR and sorry sir hum bache bahut alsi hote hai me bhi kai bar like krna bhul jate hai ...kripiya app ase hi hum sab sabka marg darshan krte Rhiye ....... Apka Piyara Sahil
Hello Sir, Plaintiff was out of station studying in final year 4th year and was called directly to the court by the head of the family i. e. mother (as father expired) telling that tenant is deceiving, troubling and all have to sign and as there was no time to read and even if at glance, words were in Marathi terminology not understood and undue influence and under coercion as sir said the reason for coercion has to be mentioned. Plaintiff was not staying there but was in a hostel in a professional college in final - 4 th year and was asked to miss one day college. Coercion, undue influence reason was plaintiff being widow with a girl child...gender bias that property was already gifted to plaintiff by her brother ( previously ancestral property) who had got it through partition already taken place between father and his two sons but domination was of mother on all properties like a Hitler. Infact by law, daughters had no right to be coparceners at that time and brother of plaintiff was also studying medical out of station and mother had taken his P. O. A. to take care of fields and his other properties, was overused or misused here in this case, brother of plaintiff being a coparcener in previous partition already held in the family of same generation, not informed and not called by head of family i. e. mother. This property was in litigation in district court in appeal during and since previous generation but dismissed. No idea was given to the advocate about giift deed already on same property. Gift deed was not mutated on property card accordingly and brother' name was there on property card in revenue city survey office. Plaintiff was not interested in that property but coercion was plaintiff had girl child (due to gender bias) and fear of property going in future to the daughter and to the future son in law was there in the mind of head of the family.. i. e. mother. Advocate was not hired by plaintiff but arranged by son in law of mother of plaintiff, taking her along with his wife to his known advocate after his prior discussions with the advocate. It was the son in law of mother of plaintiff had given an idea of partition to the advocate in the absence of plaintiff and the idea of injunction was never in the mind of plaintiff even in her dreams. Bhargav sir was saying why the reason for coercion and undue influence wasn't mentioned, so I've mentioned here. It is difficult to imagine the intensity of coercion faced by the daughters in their houses. Subject in continuation of cancellation of plaint and its decree... The said property being in commercial area was mentionned in the gift deed for the purpose of Pathological laboratory and blood bank to the plaintiff by her brother. Plaaintiff after comong from hostel usef to reside in another bunglow in an residential area which was in her another brother,'s name who had given shelter to the plaintiff) amd pllaintiff's baby-girl when plaintiff was widow at very young age but unfortunately plaintiff's second brother expired afyer twp yeats in am vehiclr accident. The son in law of mother of plaintiff had Mens rea guilty mind greedy behind properties used to fill ears of plaintiff's mother and used to take her to his friendly known advocates assuring her. advocate will solve her problems. He deceived her taking her sign on gift deed of more than six plots in name of his wife telling it to be sale deed and he will pay but did't pay. Later, he along with his wife took plaintiff's mother's signature on some papers during her fractured leg condition before surgery telling them to be bankers will not disclose gold and money if danger yo life during surgery carrying her to registration office. Those papers were will deed papers in which plaintiff's another brother's house bunglow was got written in which plaintiff with her child were residing. After death of plaintiff's mother, son in law plaintiff's mother came with his wife with 6 male and female goons and dragged out plaintiff with her daughter from their residing bunglow telling will deed is in the name of his wife. Will deed written on myth and false injunction case decree untold by plaintiff to the advocate. On the same property number tenant had filed injunction case after three years on same common opponants. This again proves non-factual injunction case an outcome of discussion between advocate and plaintiff's mother's son in law along with his wife. This also proves Mens rea with a guilty mind of plaintiff's brother in law along with his wife. Facts and truth play important role for consideration of validity of will deed or decree, will deed was also under undue influence, not a free will but a pressurised will, the complaint about which plaintiff's mother had given in police station and on stamp paper to the taluka magistrate one and half years before her demise before which she had undergone brain surgery ( just one fortnight before will was got written under deceit)and after that as befote she was staying with the plaintiff and was admitted for 17 to 20 times in hospital by plaintiff including 7-8 times in Intensive Care Unit. During which time, at the advice of the plaintiff's brother in law, his sister in law had filed suit against mother and plaintiff and against thhe said injunction case and its decree telling no partition has taken place and no. Notice of that injunction case was served to them and plaintiff's mother's brain along with that of plaintiff is completely spoiled. This suit was filed by a beneficiary in alliance with other beneficiary at the advice of her brother in law. During this pending case in court decree and injunction case, plaintiff's brother in law went in police with his wife and sister in law in accordance
Continued.. in aaccordance to invalid decree and false invalid will deed and made police to draw notice in accordance to partition and decree during the pending case against decree and injunction csse in court and plaintiff eith daughter dragged out of residing house
Namaste sir,Jesa ki sir ne bataya ki ek vyakti ki or se dusra vyakti bhi vaad la sakta hai or ek example bhi bataya socity bala to sir baha jo 50 vyakti hai unme se koi 2 vyakti vaad laye to usme unn sabhi 50 vyaktiyon ki consent hona jaruri hai ya nahi..... Vaad lane ke liye
Namste sir.... Superp se bhi superp video.... Kyoki cpc bilkul samaj me hi nahi aata tha or ye lecture se bilkul saral ho gaya. Thank you so much bhargav sir, or man mohan Sir..... Cpc ka har video bahot helpful he.... Or sir aapka video dekhte samay book bhi sath rakhti Hu ek ek word book me he..... Sir aapko kese yaad rehta he? Or book bhi banati Hu... Sir God bless you.... And thank you so much....
❤❤ सबसे पहले मैं भार्गव सर का चरण स्पर्श करना चाहूंगा क्या एक्सपीरियंस है वाह सर जी मजा आ गया सुनकर के मैं सोच रहा हूं आप मेरे टीचर होते तो मै दुनिया का सबसे बेहतरीन वकील होता मैं यह लेक्चर खाना खाते समय सुन रहा था लेकिन लेक्चर सुनते सुनते कब लेक्चर खत्म हो गया मुझे पता ही नहीं चल खाना ठंडा हो गया था मैं फिर से गर्म करके खाना खाया हूं ईश्वर से प्रार्थना है कि भार्गव सर की आयु लंबी हो और वह हम सब को इसी तरह से मार्गदर्शन करते रहें जय श्री❤❤
वाद पत्र से संबंधित जानकारियों के लिए आप दोनों विधि विशेषज्ञों का हृदय से आभार
Thanks sir
Thanks you sir. Good give me education sir.
Civil Procedure Court, 1908:
158 Sections & 58 Orders/Rules.
Processes/Stages:-
1. Plaint Preparation
(Order 1, 2, 6 & 7)
2. Place of Suing
(Section 15 to 21)
3. To Summons Defendant
(Section 27 & Order 5)
4. Plea
(Order 6, Rule 1 : Written Statement & Suit letter with Order 8)
5. Effect of Presence and Absence of parties-
(Order 9 Rule 1- Presence of Parties,
Order 1 Rule 2 to 12 - Effect of Absence of Parties)
6. Trail of Parties
(Order 10,
Rule 1a & b)
7. Discovery/Disclosure
(Order 11 Rule 1 to 11: Discovery of Facts &
Rule 12 to rest : Discovery of Documents)
8. Production of Documents
(Order 13 )
9. Framing of Issues
(Order 14)
10. Summons the Facts
(Order 16)
11. Postponement
(Order 17)
12. Recording of Evidences
(Order 18)
13. Judgement
(Order 20)
Orders Total 51 hai 58 nahi
🙏🙏
Very interested
These lectures are the assets...it will educate and help lots of seekers out there for a long time ...🙏
Hello sir आपका लेक्चर बहुत ही प्रभावी है .
मैं ला स्टूडेंट हूँ हिन्दी मीडियम से और हिंदी भाषा का संवाद मेरे लिये बहुत महत्व पूर्ण है |
need continue the CPC procedures and it's legal issues with the right of plaintiff.
Great experience Sir 🙂🙏
Video is in effective correct and balanced language with thorough knowledge.
Sir main 3 saal se vakalt kar raha hoin jitna aap ki video se mujhe fayda hoa itna to aaj tak nahi hoa
आपने बहुत ही उत्तम प्रयास किया है
Thanks sir for information in law👍👍
आदरणीय Bhargav sirji & MJ.sirji aapko mera सादर pranam🙏🏻🙏🏻 sirji yh lecture bhut hi स्पष्टORसरल sabdo me smzhaya aap gurujano ne..or bhut hi important knowledge diya..sirji aap gurujano ka bhut bhut dhanywad🙏🏻🙏🏻apki last CJ inrvw ki studnt SUSHILA BAGHEL🎓
excellent lecture
excellent to u & sr . Bhargava ji
reds
Sir Apne ne bahut ache cpc ko samjhya h ....cpc par or vedio bnaye pls
Experience bolta h sir ka ! Wish he was our teacher. ❤
Sir lots more thanks
Kl mera exam aur aj ye sunn kr bht help ho gyi again again and again lots more thanks
I'm saluting sir... Aapse bhut kuch shikhne ko mil rha h...
Great joshi sir
Perfect bhargav sir.....
I love your conversation 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Heartily thankful to you both, and specially for Bhargav sir, that they share his knowledge and experience which is very useful for us.
माननीय सर समीलात भुमि पिता मां और 4 बचचे कि उम्र 15-13-11-9साल है के नाम पर है उक्त सम्पत्ती पिता अकेले सम्पत्ती को 57-58-59 जुबानी रहन रखा मगर पंजीयन में बिक्री नामा लिखा है! और उस बिक्री नामा 57-58-59 में सभी बच्चे का नाम लिखा है हस्ताक्षर सिर्फ पिता ने( अ )किया है। क्या ये बच्चे का सम्मति में हनन हुआं या नहीं ! इसका जवाब देने कि मेहरबानी करें।( 2) केश 1975 दर्ज में हुआं। की मैं( अ )उक्त सम्पत्ती रहन रखा था मगर( ब)उसने नियत खरब कर हडपन चाहता है ।केश एस डी एम से अ के पक्ष में हुआं मगर कलेक्टर ने ब के पक्ष में पलट दिया ।।केश चलते चलते अ ने अपनी सहयता के लिए अपने दोस्त से कहां आप मुझे साथ दें सामने वाला ब दबंग है दोस्त तैयार हो गया और पुनः केश चलते चलते दोस्त( स) ने 1984-88-89 मे विश्वास में लेकर 18,4 एकड़ का 3भाग में बिक्री पंजीयन करा लिया उसमें भी हस्ताक्षर सिर्फ पिता ने किया । फिर केश चलते चलते दोस्त ने भी सम्पत्ति हड़प लिया है और केश के चलते चलते अ का देहांत 1991, और ब का देहांत 1987 -स का देहान्त 2010 और अ के बच्चे का देहांत 1984-2012-एव 2016 में हुआं । है क्या इस सम्पूर्ण सम्पत्ति में उन 15-13-111-09साल केबच्चों का हनन हुआं है या नहीं जो 1957 58-59मे 3भाग में पंजीयन पिता ने किया है करता वाद चलते चलते पुनः वाद भुमि का पंजीकरण हों सकता है और क्या एक 80-82साल का बुजुर्ग बैगर अपने बच्चों कि सहमति से पंजीयन कर सकते हैं इसका जवाब देने कि मेहरबानी करें मेरा वाट्सएप नम्बर 8817166277
@@siddiqueahmad2370 8
haM app ke roj lekcr sunte h
hmko bahut acche lgate h
Mr Josi you are very INTELEGENT person
Yes
वास्तविक विद्वान्
Sir, we are heartily thankful for your channel, and your Honourable guests, For imparting us the valuable, Knowledge.
Thanks for the Lectures which are very well explained by shree Bhargav sirji.
Acha lga aapka dhanyabad
Bahut achhe trike se sb chije smjhayi jati Hain Sir
Jo ki asani se smjh me a jati Hain
Thank you so much Sir
बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद गुरुजन।।
Sir can you please start session for UPPCSJ preparation it will be very helpful for us who cannot afford coachings please sir...
You are a very good teacher..
Sir aapka speech bahaut hi behatarin hain
Bahut hi acha lecture tha. Thank u both of you
Sir apke lecturer bhut helpfully hai agr dhyan Se sunte hai to pura yad ho jata hai
Thank u so much sir 🙏 my warm regards to u both 🙏🙏
Very helpful lecture to me thanks bhargav sir thanks to joshi sir
Thank uhh sir....
It's truly an honour to get our queries solved by such an eminent judge
Thanx for sharing most imprtant information.....keep it up sir....From Pakistan
Very interesting and important video
Very detail knowledge thank you very much
Thank you sir a lecture baahut achha lga sir esi traha se all law subject pe dete rahen sir thanks sir
Very well explained sir ji
Respected...LK Bhargava sir... very useful for judiciary aspirants...
बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद 🙏
सरल शब्दों में शानदार जानकारी प्रदान करने के लिए बहुत बहुत आभार 🙏
I m literally telling your sir it's was amazing lecture
Thanku honourable js. bhargav sir and mj sir
जोशी सर आप बहुत अच्छे से समझाते हो धन्यवाद
Sir bahut bahut Aabhar
Bahut bahut dhayawaad
बहुत ही बढ़िया सर
शानदार लेक्चर धन्यवाद सर
very awesome
Hello sir I am newly advocate and like both of him
Very very informative . Thanku to both of you sir.
Great.. learning . I thank you sir and you with the bottom of ❤
बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद सर
Very informing and cleary told by senior sir thanks sir ji
bahut accha and interesting tha
very super ....
Bhut bdiya lec. Sir
Bind bolling sir🙏
Bahot bdiya
Sir ne bhut hi Acha clarify kiya hai thank you both of you sir
Thanku sir both of
thank you sir for the excellent lecture
RESPECTED SIR, APKE DWARA SHURU KI GAI YE VIDEO SERIES OR EPISODE, WITH THE HELP OF 30 YEAR EXPERIENCED MAN IS VERY USEFUL FOR US SIR KRIPIYA APP ISE ESE HI JARI RAKHE OR HUM BACHO KO SAHI RAH OR SAHI SAMJH LAW KE BARE ME DETE RHE, APP NHI JANTE KITNE KAMJOR BACHO SAKSHAM KRTE JA RHE HAI. THANK YOU SIR and sorry sir hum bache bahut alsi hote hai me bhi kai bar like krna bhul jate hai ...kripiya app ase hi hum sab sabka marg darshan krte Rhiye ....... Apka Piyara Sahil
Bahut hi Badiya....... ।
Thanks Sir for Plaint
Very Best Sir ji
Sir kin shabdon mein dhanyvad karun you are great sir
Truly very nice & helpful video ... Thank you so much sir
Bahut achchha samjhate ho sir
This lecture is very useful for begineer .great work by you . Sir it is very useful.
भार्गव जी भारी हैं 🙏🙏🙏
Thanks sir bhut hi useful
Excellent sir ji
Sir big fan of ur teaching skills
Really very Nice🌹🌹
U r a good explainer.
बहुत अच्छा ।
Waah guruudev ..
You both are great 🙏🙏
Thankyou so much sir 🙏
And One thing is that Sir plz explained with leading cases..
Good Information given by Judge Saabh..
Hello Sir,
Plaintiff was out of station studying in final year 4th year and was called directly to the court by the head of the family i. e. mother (as father expired) telling that tenant is deceiving, troubling and all have to sign and as there was no time to read and even if at glance, words were in Marathi terminology not understood and undue influence and under coercion as sir said the reason for coercion has to be mentioned. Plaintiff was not staying there but was in a hostel in a professional college in final - 4 th year and was asked to miss one day college. Coercion, undue influence reason was plaintiff being widow with a girl child...gender bias that property was already gifted to plaintiff by her brother ( previously ancestral property) who had got it through partition already taken place between father and his two sons but domination was of mother on all properties like a Hitler. Infact by law, daughters had no right to be coparceners at that time and brother of plaintiff was also studying medical out of station and mother had taken his P. O. A. to take care of fields and his other properties, was overused or misused here in this case, brother of plaintiff being a coparcener in previous partition already held in the family of same generation, not informed and not called by head of family i. e. mother. This property was in litigation in district court in appeal during and since previous generation but dismissed.
No idea was given to the advocate about giift deed already on same property. Gift deed was not mutated on property card accordingly and brother' name was there on property card in revenue city survey office.
Plaintiff was not interested in that property but coercion was plaintiff had girl child (due to gender bias) and fear of property going in future to the daughter and to the future son in law was there in the mind of head of the family.. i. e. mother. Advocate was not hired by plaintiff but arranged by son in law of mother of plaintiff, taking her along with his wife to his known advocate after his prior discussions with the advocate. It was the son in law of mother of plaintiff had given an idea of partition to the advocate in the absence of plaintiff and the idea of injunction was never in the mind of plaintiff even in her dreams.
Bhargav sir was saying why the reason for coercion and undue influence wasn't mentioned, so I've mentioned here. It is difficult to imagine the intensity of coercion faced by the daughters in their houses.
Subject in continuation of cancellation of plaint and its decree... The said property being in commercial area was mentionned in the gift deed for the purpose of Pathological laboratory and blood bank to the plaintiff by her brother. Plaaintiff after comong from hostel usef to reside in another bunglow in an residential area which was in her another brother,'s name who had given shelter to the plaintiff) amd pllaintiff's baby-girl when plaintiff was widow at very young age but unfortunately plaintiff's second brother expired afyer twp yeats in am vehiclr accident. The son in law of mother of plaintiff had Mens rea guilty mind greedy behind properties used to fill ears of plaintiff's mother and used to take her to his friendly known advocates assuring her. advocate will solve her problems. He deceived her taking her sign on gift deed of more than six plots in name of his wife telling it to be sale deed and he will pay but did't pay. Later, he along with his wife took plaintiff's mother's signature on some papers during her fractured leg condition before surgery telling them to be bankers will not disclose gold and money if danger yo life during surgery carrying her to registration office. Those papers were will deed papers in which plaintiff's another brother's house bunglow was got written in which plaintiff with her child were residing. After death of plaintiff's mother, son in law plaintiff's mother came with his wife with 6 male and female goons and dragged out plaintiff with her daughter from their residing bunglow telling will deed is in the name of his wife. Will deed written on myth and false injunction case decree untold by plaintiff to the advocate. On the same property number tenant had filed injunction case after three years on same common opponants. This again proves non-factual injunction case an outcome of discussion between advocate and plaintiff's mother's son in law along with his wife. This also proves Mens rea with a guilty mind of plaintiff's brother in law along with his wife. Facts and truth play important role for consideration of validity of will deed or decree, will deed was also under undue influence, not a free will but a pressurised will, the complaint about which plaintiff's mother had given in police station and on stamp paper to the taluka magistrate one and half years before her demise before which she had undergone brain surgery ( just one fortnight before will was got written under deceit)and after that as befote she was staying with the plaintiff and was admitted for 17 to 20 times in hospital by plaintiff including 7-8 times in Intensive Care Unit. During which time, at the advice of the plaintiff's brother in law, his sister in law had filed suit against mother and plaintiff and against thhe said injunction case and its decree telling no partition has taken place and no. Notice of that injunction case was served to them and plaintiff's mother's brain along with that of plaintiff is completely spoiled. This suit was filed by a beneficiary in alliance with other beneficiary at the advice of her brother in law. During this pending case in court decree and injunction case, plaintiff's brother in law went in police with his wife and sister in law in accordance
Continued.. in aaccordance to invalid decree and false invalid will deed and made police to draw notice in accordance to partition and decree during the pending case against decree and injunction csse in court and plaintiff eith daughter dragged out of residing house
Sir bhut bhut thankuu bhut achha vedio tha aj ka aise hi or topic hume samjhaiyee 🙏🙏
Thank you sir🙏🙏🙏🙏
Bhut accha laga sri
Nice useful Lecture
Bahut achha lecturar h
Very excellent lecture for judicial exam & civil side practitioner.but use of English language necessary.
Thank-you bhoth of you sir
Thanks you sir ji so much very clear
Very fine sir
Sir please land law k topic bhi send kijiye aap bahut hi acha samjaate ho please sir
Thks sir
Namaste sir,Jesa ki sir ne bataya ki ek vyakti ki or se dusra vyakti bhi vaad la sakta hai or ek example bhi bataya socity bala to sir baha jo 50 vyakti hai unme se koi 2 vyakti vaad laye to usme unn sabhi 50 vyaktiyon ki consent hona jaruri hai ya nahi..... Vaad lane ke liye
Thank you sir
Namste sir....
Superp se bhi superp video....
Kyoki cpc bilkul samaj me hi nahi aata tha or ye lecture se bilkul saral ho gaya. Thank you so much bhargav sir, or man mohan Sir.....
Cpc ka har video bahot helpful he....
Or sir aapka video dekhte samay book bhi sath rakhti Hu ek ek word book me he.....
Sir aapko kese yaad rehta he?
Or book bhi banati Hu...
Sir God bless you....
And thank you so much....