it's hold back but the correction code will work on the same quantum process and to hold the quantum correction code we'll need another and so one.. man this is really complex. what they actually tryin to achieve is that it atleast work ..
Isn't there a problem with interference from...literally any movement within 1/2 mile from the chip? Correct me if I'm misunderstanding something here. I'm not an expert, but as I understand this technology, the problem of someone doing so much as sneezing disrupts these fragile little quantum bits rendering the machine useless. Isn't that the reason the deepmind machines have to be operated at extremely low temperatures? I'm all for a functional improvement in the design of a quantum chip, but...what gives?
Let me get this straight. From original idea of one qubit giving unlimited amount of calculations and possible answers, you made a qubit that has to be corrected by other qubits so that it can be converted to simple 1 or 0. This is quasi quantum computing you are talking about. Why is this video available only to people with link. Can not be found by searching on YT?!
All qubits need error correction if you want the probabilistic predictions they give you to be more accurate. Take a look at this video from here ua-cam.com/video/enfZbv-4mjE/v-deo.html where he starts saying how qubits are very fragile and tend to make errors then talks about a quantum chemistry calculation they did with their 2 qubit system in 2015 which had an error of about 0.5% and in 2017 another group did the same calculation with a system with more quibits but the quality of their qubits wasn't as good so their error was about 5% and their calculation of the energies were 10 to 20 times worse than what they did in 2015 because of that higher error of the qubits. Had their system been like this chip design and had many more qubits providing error correction then the errors their qubits wouldn't have mattered since they would have been... corrected... and instead of their result being 10 to 20 times worse than the 2015 result it would have been better.
No, I have been there, these guys are the one who are working there and in charge of the project. Most of it is funded by UNSW's endowment, not the taxpayer.
![[UA] NAVI vs MOUZ | BO5 | IEM Rio 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CMBYk0cbGoA/mqdefault.jpg)
Doesnt your correcting code would hold back quantum real potential in solving problem?
it's hold back but the correction code will work on the same quantum process and to hold the quantum correction code we'll need another and so one.. man this is really complex. what they actually tryin to achieve is that it atleast work ..
So what about the cooling requirements for the incredibly unstable nature of the qubit? Does this new architecture effect that in any way?
hmm I think it should be mounted and put into operation in Antartida lol...
Amazing. Thanks for sharing ☺️
Isn't there a problem with interference from...literally any movement within 1/2 mile from the chip? Correct me if I'm misunderstanding something here. I'm not an expert, but as I understand this technology, the problem of someone doing so much as sneezing disrupts these fragile little quantum bits rendering the machine useless. Isn't that the reason the deepmind machines have to be operated at extremely low temperatures? I'm all for a functional improvement in the design of a quantum chip, but...what gives?
Do they have a stock you could buy now?
brilliant, Kudos!
yes but does it run crysis?
I think not
It might improve some aspects of the game. Such as the a.i. of opponent bots. ;)
good contents, thank you
2018 is now and I havent even see it on the market
Let me get this straight. From original idea of one qubit giving unlimited amount of calculations and possible answers, you made a qubit that has to be corrected by other qubits so that it can be converted to simple 1 or 0. This is quasi quantum computing you are talking about. Why is this video available only to people with link. Can not be found by searching on YT?!
You can read the white paper for more information.
I found it on a Search, maybe you are doing it Wrong...
All qubits need error correction if you want the probabilistic predictions they give you to be more accurate.
Take a look at this video from here ua-cam.com/video/enfZbv-4mjE/v-deo.html where he starts saying how qubits are very fragile and tend to make errors then talks about a quantum chemistry calculation they did with their 2 qubit system in 2015 which had an error of about 0.5% and in 2017 another group did the same calculation with a system with more quibits but the quality of their qubits wasn't as good so their error was about 5% and their calculation of the energies were 10 to 20 times worse than what they did in 2015 because of that higher error of the qubits.
Had their system been like this chip design and had many more qubits providing error correction then the errors their qubits wouldn't have mattered since they would have been... corrected... and instead of their result being 10 to 20 times worse than the 2015 result it would have been better.
Isn't this simmilar to the "flip-flop" system proposed a while back ?
I would like to give a qubit the right dig he needs.
this looks like ion semiconductor sequencing? am I wrong? its how i learn.. from correcting my ideas from people who know better!
This reminds me of the tower of babal, once the people got to a certain point God confused them so they couldn't understand each other.
You dumbed this down way way too much, what about the single layer diamond mask with the nitrogen inclusions?
China done it before anyone
Goodbye ASICS hello Quantum computer
0:33
I thought he said “pubic hair”
Lmfao
well it's not real quantum computing. Kinda simulation, but no one can assure results got this way will be similar like from real "fragile" qubits
Funny and typical that their Australian engineers are mostly asians.
Bahahaha. These lame actors reading off teleprompter, gesturing to appear smarter. Pathetic to watch. Just another way to get taxpayer's money.
No, I have been there, these guys are the one who are working there and in charge of the project. Most of it is funded by UNSW's endowment, not the taxpayer.
poread.com/reading-lessons-donkey/