Quantum Computers Aren’t What You Think - They’re Cooler | Hartmut Neven | TED

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
  • Quantum computers obtain superpowers by tapping into parallel universes, says Hartmut Neven, the founder and lead of Google Quantum AI. He explains how this emerging tech can far surpass traditional computers by relying on quantum physics rather than binary logic, and shares a roadmap to build the ultimate quantum computer. Learn how this fascinating and powerful tech can help humanity take on seemingly unsolvable problems in medicine, sustainable energy, AI, neuroscience and more.
    If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas: ted.com/member...
    Follow TED!
    X: / tedtalks
    Instagram: / ted
    Facebook: / ted
    LinkedIn: / ted-conferences
    TikTok: / tedtoks
    The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world's leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design - plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.
    Watch more: go.ted.com/har...
    • Quantum Computers Aren...
    TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (or the CC BY - NC - ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy: www.ted.com/ab.... For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at media-requests...
    #TED #TEDTalks #quantumcomputing

КОМЕНТАРІ • 444

  • @drewbie879
    @drewbie879 Місяць тому +52

    If you’re looking for an accessible, logical explanation of how quantum computing works, then this… is not it.

  • @whoslacks
    @whoslacks Місяць тому +103

    Regarding the sunglasses on the head: As a bald guy, I can tell you,he’s preventing the light from gleaming off his head and permanently blinding the audience. A true gentleman.

    • @dave3197
      @dave3197 Місяць тому +7

      Quantum computing could potentially reveal new and better ways to minimize that gleam.

    • @alst4817
      @alst4817 20 днів тому +1

      He’s collecting the quanta of light particles to use later

    • @mcpoulet13
      @mcpoulet13 18 днів тому

      interesting

  • @jme3512
    @jme3512 Місяць тому +51

    He got a PhD and the D stands for drip. My boy styling

    • @GK-qc5ry
      @GK-qc5ry 28 днів тому

      😂

    • @PK-tc2uq
      @PK-tc2uq 9 днів тому

      Is that a post nasal drip.

    • @ErikSanchez-cs1pv
      @ErikSanchez-cs1pv 9 днів тому

      I was thinking the same thing.
      Phat Drip (PhD) 😂

  • @nzoomed
    @nzoomed Місяць тому +54

    Basically a quantum computer is a whole box of schrodingers cats.

    • @joelpichette
      @joelpichette Місяць тому +4

      Basically a quantum co-processor is simply a chip that can use one or many (qbit) analog signal(s) instead of a digital signal, but they can't explain it with those "easy to understand" words because they are well paid, they make conferences and their living $ on the Schrödinger's cat concept and explanations

    • @hemantsharma637
      @hemantsharma637 29 днів тому +2

      This is amazingly correct statement

    • @PierreH1968
      @PierreH1968 26 днів тому +1

      Schrödinger's kittens are either, napping, awake, or have quantum tunneled out of the box...

    • @billyb9089
      @billyb9089 25 днів тому

      @@PierreH1968 “maybe”

  • @fishcadet
    @fishcadet Місяць тому +83

    The sunglasses make him very relatable.

    • @Coktane_
      @Coktane_ Місяць тому +1

      That's right, actual smart people are now seeing through the veil

    • @larryslemp9698
      @larryslemp9698 Місяць тому

      Petty comment..!!

    • @acmelka
      @acmelka Місяць тому

      If he put them down, he'd have that sweet evil genius vibe

    • @Pableras46
      @Pableras46 Місяць тому

      it is just a code. When wearing them like that he lets others know despite all the quantum he is just coming from the rave

    • @anders4621
      @anders4621 Місяць тому +1

      Its so no one can wipe his memory :)

  • @seekerofthemutablebalance5228
    @seekerofthemutablebalance5228 Місяць тому +53

    The real science was the friends we made along the way

  • @thegroke4839
    @thegroke4839 Місяць тому +6

    A much simpler way to describe this, instead of using a many worlds theory, would be to say there is a yes, a no and a maybe or what if state. With his three coins he could have had one on heads, another on tails and the third balancing on it's edge, ready to fall either way when interfered with.

  • @sundaramvenkitarama3956
    @sundaramvenkitarama3956 Місяць тому +170

    Maybe I missed it - does the presenter say anywhere in the video in how many fields you need to get PhD' s before watching this video?

    • @ironeagle4274
      @ironeagle4274 Місяць тому +3

      Yea, I didn't truly understand the explanations and definitions he gave, but I can understand, in a general sense, the importance and purpose of quantum computing. It was definitely perplexing to watch at certain moments.

    • @stevefromsaskatoon830
      @stevefromsaskatoon830 Місяць тому +29

      I'm dumb truck driver from Canada.. the only thing I didn't understand was his outfit 😀

    • @deeliciousplum
      @deeliciousplum Місяць тому +1

      @@stevefromsaskatoon830 The gentleman's coat can be said to be in a quantum superposition. If there is nothing observing it/ measuring it, the item can be claimed to be a coat and a bedding comforter (aka a duvet).

    • @ramireznoy
      @ramireznoy Місяць тому +4

      He didn't do a good job selling the equivalence with a multiverse, magic and wormholes.
      Overall he totally failed to explain the basic principles like superposition, qbit and even quantum computing.
      It is a very bad presentation.
      I guess he think we are too dumb and ended up being dumb himself.

    • @patrickispeppa
      @patrickispeppa Місяць тому +1

      In my opinion he's explaining the concepts way too complicated.

  • @muhammadaqibismaeel631
    @muhammadaqibismaeel631 Місяць тому +15

    0 understanding but 100 curiosity 😂

  • @UFOgamers
    @UFOgamers Місяць тому +262

    Quantum mechanics does not prove multiverse hypothesis, the multiverse hypothesis is just a solution suggested to explain the weirdness of superpositions and collapses. Multiverse hypothesis is not based on an objective truth or testable scientific experiments. He should know better than to give such examples for a large audience, propagating myths like this is not productive.

    • @JessieThorne886
      @JessieThorne886 Місяць тому +33

      He really doesn't seem too worried about making wild, as of yet scientifically unsubstantiated conjectures, what with the whole "we'll be able to expand human consciousness through space and time". However, I like that he's not afraid to think creatively.

    • @SibLondon
      @SibLondon Місяць тому +16

      Nobody understands quantum mechanics. Especially general public at TED talk. Multiverse hypothesis, on the other hand, can be explained pretty simply. So, his explanation is more than OK.

    • @UFOgamers
      @UFOgamers Місяць тому +19

      @@SibLondon nobody understands what happens after death. So is it ok for me to give my version of the truth and present it as a fact ? No it’s not.

    • @christopherallen7549
      @christopherallen7549 Місяць тому +16

      ​@@UFOgamers You're describing what every religion on Earth does everyday.

    • @leahleeds4289
      @leahleeds4289 Місяць тому +1

      @@UFOgamersyou may look into a Course of Miracles if you like this kinda stuff.

  • @jeremyckahn
    @jeremyckahn Місяць тому +4

    I understand quantum computing less after watching this video than I did going in

  • @Its_marcc
    @Its_marcc Місяць тому +3

    Wow it's Dr. Emmet from back to the future - life this guy and his style and knowledge

  • @abdullahunal1108
    @abdullahunal1108 Місяць тому +26

    I think concluding that superposition and quantum properties are signs of a multiverse is far-fetched. It's just that the rules governing things at that scale are different from what we experience. This doesn't necessarily imply that what we observe in the quantum world necessitates the existence of parallel universes.

    • @SuitedPup
      @SuitedPup Місяць тому +3

      That’s a fair assessment, but the many-worlds interpretation is a plausible explanation. It indeed may be the case that quantum computers are performing parallel computing in parallel universes. More likely, it’s just an apt way of describing / modeling whatever is really happening.

    • @sethlamancusa
      @sethlamancusa Місяць тому +4

      Seconding what the other commenter said. Personally I think many worlds sounds far fetched but makes way more sense than your traditional copenhagen interpretation. It's actually the simplest explanation of what we observe, since it doesn't impose wave function collapse. Sean Carrol advocates this argument really well

    • @Michael-ul7kv
      @Michael-ul7kv Місяць тому

      Very far-fetched

    • @sethlamancusa
      @sethlamancusa Місяць тому +2

      @@Michael-ul7kv I agree actually that its unlikely that "many worlds" is the right way of thinking about the entire wave function and its splitting, but I do think it's the closest thing to a philosophically sensible interpretation and the best starting point for continuing to think about foundations of qm, which has been woefully neglected for the past century

    • @notarobot1494
      @notarobot1494 Місяць тому +2

      I think the issue isn’t that he’s presenting the multiverse hypothesis at all, but that he’s presenting it to the public who doesn’t have the information he does. Sure, it might be a useful model, but presumably nobody in the audience understands what’s flawed with this model because he’s presenting it so confidently as fact

  • @rodintoulouse3054
    @rodintoulouse3054 Місяць тому +42

    And this was the easy way to explain it? Maybe in another multiverse 😊

    • @joeloiacono8850
      @joeloiacono8850 Місяць тому

      the processing happens in extra dimensions of spacetime, think of it like a classic mult-thread CPU only those threads are actually extra dimensions of spacetime.

    • @ITrendzI
      @ITrendzI 29 днів тому

      @@joeloiacono8850your explanation doesn’t help. Explain it to us like we’re 10 lol

  • @christineliang4670
    @christineliang4670 Місяць тому +2

    @0:40 "Where does this superpower come from? Quantum computer is the first technology that takes the idea serious that we live in a multiverse. It can be seen as farming out computations to parallel universes." This is David Deutsch's idea !! in his book "The Fabric of Reality".

  • @ralfbaechle
    @ralfbaechle Місяць тому +4

    While the existence of the multiverse is unproven and probably unprovable I learned it to be a great way of explaining things at a popular science level.
    Computer architecture has always been my thing. And so has physics been, so quantum computers are just the next crazy thing I'd love to work on.

    • @scheeenfilmiesgucke
      @scheeenfilmiesgucke Місяць тому

      Hey Ralf kennst du den Gregor

    • @ralfbaechle
      @ralfbaechle Місяць тому

      @@scheeenfilmiesgucke Gregor wer?

    • @scheeenfilmiesgucke
      @scheeenfilmiesgucke Місяць тому +1

      @@ralfbaechle Gregor Baechle...

    • @ralfbaechle
      @ralfbaechle Місяць тому

      @@scheeenfilmiesgucke Jetzt schon. Dank google ;-)

    • @DerekDAngel
      @DerekDAngel Місяць тому

      We may not be able to prove the multiverse theory, but when he mentions a "parallel" universe i believe he's referring to the duality of this universe that we're experiencing today. Our universe is technically two realities, and could potentially be conjoined in a state of superposition with equipment like this.
      We harvest anti-matter, and the existence of anti-matter is sufficient evidence of a parallel universe that's made up entirely of anti-matter.

  • @colton_936
    @colton_936 Місяць тому +26

    Can't wait to see what's possible with quantum AI

    • @ix4564
      @ix4564 Місяць тому +4

      Teleportation and holodeck from star trek

    • @moundagarten69
      @moundagarten69 Місяць тому +3

      Me too. The OTT hype potential will be incredible!

    • @londontrack6099
      @londontrack6099 Місяць тому

      What are some examples?

    • @jurjenbos228
      @jurjenbos228 Місяць тому

      That's nothing. If you also use cold fusion and cyber genetic blockchains, you will get millions (of investment money).

  • @danjo8673
    @danjo8673 Місяць тому +2

    Looks like Skynet is almost here 😀 With these advancements so far, this computer could calculate its own redesign and finish the final four steps in no time. Computers have come a long way, especially since my first computer was an Atari 800XL and a model 1050 5 1/4 inch floppy drive 41 years ago. I still have it, and it still works!

  • @steveb7853
    @steveb7853 Місяць тому +7

    I wanted to listen to this but kept looking at the sunglasses thinking 'why'?

    • @HeatherSZ
      @HeatherSZ 28 днів тому +1

      and the shoes, distracting

  • @uapReX
    @uapReX Місяць тому +21

    Now I want a 'Time Crystal ' :P

  • @MattHabermehl
    @MattHabermehl Місяць тому +3

    If we are exploiting parallell worlds to do quantum computation, does that mean that those worlds also have a quantum computer doing the same thing?

    • @jettrom609
      @jettrom609 27 днів тому

      “Parallel worlds” is more of an analogy in this scenario. We are not actually exploiting other worlds to do computations, but we are doing something similar. Quantum computers can essentially evaluate multiple different possibilities at the same time, collapsing them into a single result.

  • @DerekDAngel
    @DerekDAngel Місяць тому +1

    I'm both enamored and terrified of what these machines will be capable of. I wish Turing, Bohr, Einstein, and Oppenheimer were here to see this. They would be so proud.

  • @Yourmission9
    @Yourmission9 Місяць тому +1

    This was highly interesting, and I enjoyed how he broke it down for the audience. On a side note can I say this gentleman looks like the German version of Bryan Cranston?

  • @VioletWander314
    @VioletWander314 Місяць тому +1

    So fun, I call these pocket dimensions! (All simultaneous possibilities positionally)

  • @djoecav
    @djoecav Місяць тому +1

    Next time get some aviator goggles. With that fit and that dome, you could probably make it work.

  • @JM-us3fr
    @JM-us3fr Місяць тому +3

    Don’t forget about cryptography! Being able to factor integers or computer discrete logarithms instantly breaks many commonly used crypto systems.

    • @CplusO2
      @CplusO2 Місяць тому

      Fully, the first real example of quantum computing may be to hack crypto.

  • @evrenguney1
    @evrenguney1 29 днів тому +1

    Does anyone know what the big step in optimization using Quantum computers is
    ?

  • @plateer42
    @plateer42 Місяць тому +17

    Show some results. Just another pretty presentation.

    • @AI_Image_Master
      @AI_Image_Master Місяць тому

      He's just hitting all the important buzzwords and explaining nothing. As he said he has been working on Goggles Quantum computer for 12 years and basically at this point has nothing really to show.

  • @h.h.c466
    @h.h.c466 Місяць тому +2

    04:10 finding one item in a DB of four cannot be done with one call in traditional instances? How is this meant? It is one query. It is quite strangely worded when referring to the search algorithm behind it. "In a database of four?" Sorry .. it is Big O root of n on average .. so could be 50% of cases 2 calls ... ah he meant Iterative Amplification and then it highlights within the superimposition the one state with high prob. yeah that is then 1.23 iterations , so 1 enough?

    • @h.h.c466
      @h.h.c466 Місяць тому

      For me the Grover Algorithm is like a parallel suspect line: parallel witness checking all suspects simultaneously, where each suspect reacts to the witness's criteria without direct marking. With each iteration, the suspect matching the criteria becomes more prominent, while others feel increasingly overlooked. This repeated process makes the correct suspect stand out more, ensuring they are identified with high probability in the final check .... probably more complicated in the setup with the Repetition of Oracle and Diffusion but for me it helped getting the rough idea understood.

  • @Toughbeard
    @Toughbeard Місяць тому +1

    I would like to see the brute forcing capability of the QC against the current 256Bit encryption. Now he said the processing power is 1 Billion times more at the currect phase and here is a quote "AES-256 encryption is virtually uncrackable using any brute-force method. It would take millions of years to break it using the current computing technology and capabilities."
    My math may not be on par with this guy but I think he said he can brute force the AES-256 in 0.365 days... thats 8.76 hours... so a lack of how many millions of years is the unknown in this equation.
    Am I wrong here? And we are talking phase 2...

  • @mercace156
    @mercace156 Місяць тому +3

    What stocks to buy besides QUBT?

  • @christophessig5686
    @christophessig5686 Місяць тому +6

    Out of all possible multiverses, we live in the one, where he chose this outfit - or maybe he just asked his quantum-computer what 16yos would think looks cool.

    • @mactubex
      @mactubex Місяць тому

      I think they do not know time has passed, they have lived in the lab since 1997

    • @RoySmith-lb9vh
      @RoySmith-lb9vh 26 днів тому

      Where he is from, it is cool

  • @charliesmaker
    @charliesmaker Місяць тому +20

    this guy's fit is unreal... superposition drip 💦💦

  • @tysonfinn1470
    @tysonfinn1470 Місяць тому +1

    After he explained it all perfectly i still didnt understand anything but i think his sunglasses are cool.

  • @mrsquiggles1379
    @mrsquiggles1379 29 днів тому +1

    I couldnt imagine being the lead of a bleeding edge field as this. Mapping consciousness? this is wild

  • @mikewebb1514
    @mikewebb1514 Місяць тому +2

    My basic understanding has been that surfing the multiverse gives the illusion of free will and is the basis of consciousness. Glad to hear that Hartmut Neven had a similar thought. Would love to learn more. I marvel at what leap someone had to have to harness the multiverse in computing. Does it mean that there are a huge number of quantum computers in "many worlds" running the program in parallel? Once a reality splits off from this parallel path do we loose connection to that machine, or is that how the probability is calculated?

    • @lucasinatur2925
      @lucasinatur2925 Місяць тому +2

      This many worlds or multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics is not even testable or provable in any way. I really don't like how he wasn't more clear about his use of metaphors, especially with such a large audience.
      Additionally quantum computers are not normal computers which can run a lot of things in parallel, these things exist already. Quantum computers work fundamentally different and the "parallelization" happening in them is completely different from traditional parallelization.

    • @mikewebb1514
      @mikewebb1514 Місяць тому

      ​@@lucasinatur2925 Lucas,
      I am an artist, one who wanders the labyrinth of scientific discovery, embracing my peculiar nature. As an artist, I strive to decipher the intricate patterns woven into the fabric of what I read. For a scientist, the multiverse theory may hold little utility, for it stretches beyond the confines of our testable reality. This boundary marks the edge of hypotheses, a threshold many are content to honor. I understand and respect this devotion to empirical rigor.
      Yet, as an artist, I am liberated from the shackles of the provable. My imagination embarks on daring voyages through realms of "what if," enthralled by the boundless expanse of possibilities. Scientists unveil their finest theories, and my mind dances with these concepts until they spark a revelation.
      Much of it is fantasy but that's ok for me.

  • @Clover-qz8nl
    @Clover-qz8nl Місяць тому +2

    Thank you for sharing your amazing work with the world ❤️ it’s so inspiring and so important that you share your work with the world as well as the rest of the community to help make this world a safer and better place in the future for everyone 💕 a big thank you and keep it coming my friend and keep up the way you do it 💕 keep going strong 💪 thank youuuu and have an amazing week

  • @h.h.c466
    @h.h.c466 Місяць тому +1

    So it starts with three coins mentioned 01:25 , and some python, how hard in this going to be .. 😊

  • @ripvanstinkle
    @ripvanstinkle 21 день тому

    Two quotes that will now live in my head rent free:
    "Quantum computing is the first technology that takes the idea that we live in a multi-verse seriously. It can be seen as farming out computations to parallel universes."
    "Consciousness is how we experience the emergence of a single classical world out of the many the multiverse is composed of."

  • @eastindiaV
    @eastindiaV 22 дні тому

    So the key is to have an insane ammount of storage space, full of data, that was translated from text to algorithm... and then to code.
    Then, run that through a processor, which has inputs from the user, to achieve different tasks.
    And all that funnels into a display, which can show images of data that has been quantized.
    That's the most basic setup.
    Then the next logical step, is to add machine learning to the storage unit, to further integrate whats been stored.
    Then, youd start feeding more information into the storage unit, for more abilities on the processing and display side.
    And forget computer code.
    The best way is to create algorithms that can translate speech and text, into the computers own language.

  • @brianegendorf2023
    @brianegendorf2023 22 дні тому

    On one hand, he is going for the technical aspects of what Quantum Computing looks like. But I just want to point out...that the best analogy I can give to simplify the advantage of such a computer..think of it this way..Everything our current computers do requires some kind of bandwith of data that is usually distributed across a bus..(a bank of circuit lines set aside for a specific purpose. Like a RAM bus, or I/O bus). Buses get bigger every few generations of computers to handle more data going back and forth in the computer. A single bus can have 64, 128, 256 lanes or more to accomodate all of the digital 1's and 0's passing through them. Like lanes of a highway. Imagine if your local highway had 128 lanes to accommodate all of the traffic driving on it. Now, with q-bits in quantum mechanics, the "1"'s and "0"s are replaced with 0-10*x^27 or something like that as a single digit. Suddenly, all of the traffic in the 128 lane highway fits into a single lane, and there is still a LOT more room for cars before you'd need to create a second lane. Like every car on the planet and THEN a lot more could fit in that lane. And the thing is. because its actually a single "digit" on that quantum board, it doesn't take any longer for a digit of any value of that q-bit to reach the end of its trip. If you put a large number in a standard computer, it takes several clock cycles to fully move that information to the next part of the circuit. In a quantum computer, moving a number that fits in that q-bit range only takes....one clock cycle. Can you imagine how fast those computers will be when they finally start doing practical things? We might actually have to purposely slow the user interface portions of the computer down to make it even usable by humans.

  • @undaware
    @undaware Місяць тому +1

    It could yet be all in their heads.

  • @corwinzelazney5312
    @corwinzelazney5312 Місяць тому +2

    Love the way he pronounces quantum: kw-ant-um.

  • @CrashBashL
    @CrashBashL 14 днів тому

    Thank you for this lecture.
    Now I know how to use my own quantum computer.

  • @AI_Image_Master
    @AI_Image_Master Місяць тому +1

    Many people actually refute the suggestion that they actual computation that they did would take 1 B years for today's fastest super computer to do. It's above my pay grade to explain it, but I have read a lot from reputable sources that their claim is not correct.

  • @sikhathakur8349
    @sikhathakur8349 Місяць тому +3

    Ted's videos are the most informative and excellent ones

    • @JayyyMilli
      @JayyyMilli Місяць тому +1

      Yeah but sometimes a video ends and I can’t remember what I learned Loll

  • @user-sy2ik7pl1w
    @user-sy2ik7pl1w 27 днів тому

    Imagine being able to deliver individual cure if Quantum computers live upto it's promise. I don't understand a word he said, but I can sense the step is in the right direction.

  • @benius42
    @benius42 Місяць тому +27

    The day Google is reading your bloodsugar and smelling your food we are doomed.

    • @fonzdaii
      @fonzdaii Місяць тому +4

      He just talked about potentially expanding your consciousness through spacetime and you're worried about glucose meters?

  • @Laralinda
    @Laralinda Місяць тому +2

    So he must have some kind of theory how this "smartphone-NMR" should work. What is it? How it is supposed to work?

  • @dinarwali386
    @dinarwali386 Місяць тому +2

    Fascinating: What are the biggest challenges to building a large-scale quantum computer?

    • @BarryKort
      @BarryKort Місяць тому +3

      Decoherence is the chief issue to deal with. Entangled qubits tend to decohere for multiple reasons, limiting the number of computational steps that can be completed before decoherence ruins the calculation.

    • @jmanakajosh9354
      @jmanakajosh9354 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@BarryKort
      Thank you! That's enlightening.

    • @corrupted_realm
      @corrupted_realm 28 днів тому

      Noise

  • @ramsenn2680
    @ramsenn2680 Місяць тому +3

    So is QC just replacing current physical silicon/electricity computation with wave conversion of the same threads, thereby allowing almost limitless computation in a short time since you’re not bound by physical elements?

  • @miggle1875
    @miggle1875 Місяць тому +29

    I want to believe him but those weird sunglasses on his head are suspicious 😅

  • @derekroper3168
    @derekroper3168 Місяць тому +1

    If you think that climate change is humanity’s most urgent problem versus a possible looming nuclear war on more than one front you need to rethink things.

    • @EolosMusic
      @EolosMusic 28 днів тому

      Touch some grass ma boy

  • @mcpoulet13
    @mcpoulet13 Місяць тому +28

    Is there a parallel universe where he doesn't have his sun glasses on his head while giving this talk because it would be less distracting.

    • @alexeykulikov5661
      @alexeykulikov5661 Місяць тому +3

      Not sure what you dislike about that. It's a part of his style, he wants it, he wears it.

    • @abhijeet60
      @abhijeet60 Місяць тому

      I hope there should be a parallel universe where you are listening his words rather then watching his glasses

    • @Lootalot
      @Lootalot Місяць тому

      I hope there is a parallel universe where I don’t read this obnoxious comment 🚮

    • @mcpoulet13
      @mcpoulet13 18 днів тому

      @@Lootalot sorry, wrong universe

  • @WanderingWeirdly
    @WanderingWeirdly Місяць тому +4

    3:01 So, Naruto's shadow clone training 🙃

  • @0xsupersane920
    @0xsupersane920 Місяць тому +4

    He's like the Kanye of the Quantum computing world.

    • @Raydensheraj
      @Raydensheraj 24 дні тому

      And Kanye West is just a Xanax version of Farrakhan.

  • @WyFoster
    @WyFoster Місяць тому +15

    Quantum computer, can give you an answer to a yes or no question, and every answer in-between. Extraordinary.

    • @diegoalejandrosanchezherre4788
      @diegoalejandrosanchezherre4788 Місяць тому +1

      actually, is more like explore all the posible path's of a labyrinth at the same time...

    • @Nelo390
      @Nelo390 Місяць тому +1

      That isn't it at all.

  • @AwareOCE
    @AwareOCE 16 днів тому

    Absolutely fascinating! Great video!

  • @Joeofiowa
    @Joeofiowa Місяць тому +1

    Great example of oversimplification essentially making the points meaningless

    • @johnsuede
      @johnsuede 11 днів тому

      What would be the alternative? Respectfully, theoretical physicists have IQ in the top .1%. It would be tough to fill a Ted talk room for this lecture I think. The only alternative is to simplify.

  • @pogothem3526
    @pogothem3526 Місяць тому +2

    bro dripped out beyond belief

  • @mikkel715
    @mikkel715 Місяць тому +1

    There is no evidence proving that quantum computers require parallel worlds.
    This video is a promotion of the 'Many Worlds' interpretation, which is just one of several interpretations of quantum mechanics.

  • @benhammond6717
    @benhammond6717 Місяць тому +1

    So this guy is the main super villain in the next Bond movie right?

  • @raralis
    @raralis Місяць тому +2

    100 qubits?
    Dynex is already reaching 1m qubits

    • @kristianTV1974
      @kristianTV1974 23 дні тому +1

      Well, their marketing department is at least.

  • @user-gk7iq6if9q
    @user-gk7iq6if9q Місяць тому

    Thank YOU 👍
    BRAVO 👏👏👏👏👏

  • @somenygaard
    @somenygaard Місяць тому +1

    Denying the massive evidence for ID is at this point becoming comedic considering the “evidence” for a multiverse is paper thin.

  • @r0d0j0g9
    @r0d0j0g9 Місяць тому +2

    Why we dont use quantum computers to improve AI

    • @hardheadjarhead
      @hardheadjarhead Місяць тому +1

      It’s going to be the other way around. We’ll use A.I. to perfect quantum computing. If we get AGI, it will happen rather quickly.

  • @Bluth53
    @Bluth53 Місяць тому +8

    This talk wasn't impressive - shades worn on the head though, are and will always be, so cool 😎

    • @miggle1875
      @miggle1875 Місяць тому +3

      Uh, wrong lol

    • @acmelka
      @acmelka Місяць тому

      He should have worn them down and owned the evil genius look

  • @uaps28
    @uaps28 Місяць тому

    Oh, baby, the quantum computing revolution has arrived!!!!

  • @noworriesbehappymr.x7681
    @noworriesbehappymr.x7681 Місяць тому +1

    What is he talking about?

  • @4LauraNP
    @4LauraNP Місяць тому +7

    Nurse Practitioner here... wow! Wheels in brain rapidly turning! The applications in healthcare are immeasurable! Awesome! Thanks for what you do

    • @davidnewell3232
      @davidnewell3232 Місяць тому +3

      The wheels in the brain go round and round, round and round...

    • @jurjenbos228
      @jurjenbos228 Місяць тому +2

      Yes, it is pretty good marketing.

    • @seekerofthemutablebalance5228
      @seekerofthemutablebalance5228 Місяць тому

      It's simultaneously cutting edge science and complete bs marketing. Quantum science

  • @rhvre
    @rhvre Місяць тому +4

    This dude isn't what you think - he's cooler!

  • @MGBranco
    @MGBranco 20 днів тому

    Well I start programing with the zx spectrum like what...40,42 years ago? I wonder how it the home computer will be within 40 years? I sure it will be implanted in our brain for sure!

  • @jaseboon6282
    @jaseboon6282 Місяць тому

    What happens when AI is loaded onto a QC ?

  • @reggieziet
    @reggieziet Місяць тому +10

    Well, with that sunglasses, Mr. Neven is even cooler than Quantum Computers.

  • @htmlfortomorrow
    @htmlfortomorrow Місяць тому

    Yeah i like the way they look like but not the endless algorithms it requires only if you don't know

  • @user-pw7up1yd8b
    @user-pw7up1yd8b 14 днів тому

    Its actually impossible but also scaring thinkin about combine AI with this

  • @toi_techno
    @toi_techno Місяць тому +1

    Lock up your undergrads, Hartmut's here

  • @user-hm7xs8qx2f
    @user-hm7xs8qx2f Місяць тому

    Send you “love icon” from Vietnam

  • @ArthurLi-wl7ni
    @ArthurLi-wl7ni Місяць тому

    What’s the implications for bitcoin?

  • @spzize
    @spzize Місяць тому +1

    I saw this title and thought to myself, ''literally!"

  • @erik_carter_art
    @erik_carter_art Місяць тому

    I'm not very familiar with quantum computing, but is it generally expected in the field that it will follow the pattern of progress observed with conventional computing re: Moore's Law?

    • @jmanakajosh9354
      @jmanakajosh9354 Місяць тому

      Moore's law is a trend. QC is bound by physics and if Google decides it's to much of that 90 billion of juicy revenue it makes. Progress could easily slow down.

    • @inflivia
      @inflivia Місяць тому

      Not at all. It was relatively easy to keep making smaller and smaller transistors just by making better lithography equipment and nothing else. Quantum computers start from the beginning with the smallest particles, and that comes with inherent problems like noise, interference, isolation, which at the moment all require very elaborate support system like cryogenics cooling.

  • @mpendulombhele5036
    @mpendulombhele5036 Місяць тому

    *Here on behalf of South Africa*🇿🇦 1:20

  • @PK-tc2uq
    @PK-tc2uq 9 днів тому

    No need to worry about free radicals. James Bond already disarmed them in one of the early Bond movies.

  • @mattfrenden1000
    @mattfrenden1000 Місяць тому

    I guess it'll only get better and smaller from here

  • @yashvardhanpanjiyar4032
    @yashvardhanpanjiyar4032 Місяць тому +6

    It is really Facinating

  • @Manatoro
    @Manatoro 24 дні тому

    Is he suggesting that each person has their own experience of the multiverse? In other words, every conscious being lives in its own universe, tuned from the multiverse. Consciousness is the tuning that travels through every living being across the multiverse. Therefore, consciousness is one, but with different experiences across various universes. Every living being is a fraction of its expression. It may be Existance itself.

  • @LostWolvesNomad
    @LostWolvesNomad Місяць тому +1

    Did he just say these computers will evolve humans?

  • @neilbeni7744
    @neilbeni7744 Місяць тому +1

    This is some trippy $#!+...

  • @kilianlindberg
    @kilianlindberg Місяць тому

    Fantastic talk !
    And some inspiration for whom it may concern:
    I have a sense that cymatics with water and light can be leveraged more and easier than what may have been thought. Resonance and water has some cool properties at certain water molecule resonant frequencies applying frequency modulation and even multiple layers in water body which indeed reflects light for logic operations (computing) .. some will write this off as nonsense others may realize that there are certain cool properties in freezing water and leveraging the waves as a buffer for data; even that certain types of quite “advanced” non-binary computation can be made.. and not requiring extreme conditions; more like access to freezing point, some nice controlled pressure in conjunction with air, wave energizers, sensors and light .. yep, there are cool stuff to discover here 😇🌊 may I suggest some AI boosted resonance research; Aĩr

  • @قصص_شفاء_شيقة_الشفاءمن_السرطان

    اذا كنت مريض ...اخبرني بمرضك لأساعدك بالمعلومه اللتي تفيدك 🔥🔥🔥

  • @moonlightzanelengubane713
    @moonlightzanelengubane713 Місяць тому

    im hoping to be alive to see the revolution of Quantum Computers in my lifetime

  • @susanblackley7065
    @susanblackley7065 Місяць тому +4

    Rabbit holes, here I come!

  • @Comenta-san
    @Comenta-san Місяць тому

    Nice👌This is why I'm subscribed to TED 👏👏👏

  • @mrcakey3704
    @mrcakey3704 Місяць тому +2

    I was terrified. A man pronounced quantum in a quirky way a lot. I'm still terrified.

  • @user-ro8vt4kj6o
    @user-ro8vt4kj6o Місяць тому

    from past few years iim interested in quantum computers but don't know where to learn it from

  • @venugopal1982
    @venugopal1982 Місяць тому

    Interesting definition of consciousness .

  • @akivaprivate595
    @akivaprivate595 Місяць тому +7

    The Quantum Computers has no clothes

  • @danjwalker
    @danjwalker 24 дні тому

    To summarize for all you noobs out there. This is deconjucating passive instances of unicle code aversion techniques. It provides post-computational pragmatic analysis by divding nuberations on a passive scale.

  • @RoySmith-lb9vh
    @RoySmith-lb9vh 26 днів тому

    Observation is what is truly weird

  • @klakkinkittykat
    @klakkinkittykat Місяць тому +1

    I'm a Navajo!