U.S. Marines Has a New Ship-Killing Weapon Can Destroy a Warship 100 Miles Away
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 лип 2023
- The U.S. Marine Corps' top modernization priority is fulfilling the ground-based anti-ship missile capability requirement. The operational requirement for this ship-killing capability is a relatively new development stemming from the Commandant's Planning Guidance and the Corps' Force Design 2030 efforts.
Support us:
UA-cam : @USDefenseNews
Facebook : / usdn.official
Instagram : / us_defensenews
If you have any problems viewing this Video, please report it here: usdn.official@gmail.com - Наука та технологія
It's not "Marine CORPSE".
😆😂🤣
Marine Corps… just add ‘e’… and it is a dead Marine
Marine Corps
Is this just bad text-to-speech?
I hate these computer voices!🤣
I didn't know that a corpse could fire a missile
The Corpse fires the missile remotely!😅
The 100 mile range is significant because that is the approximate width of the Taiwan strait between Taiwan and China.
I wonder how how China plans to get through hundreds of antiship missiles without getting 60% of its fleet sunk the first day
100 miles. That is the distance from Taiwan to the mainland.
This together with Spike NLOS will be a very potent defense for Taiwan against a Chinese invasion force.
Harpoon Auto-bot 😍😍
Given the rapid closeness that is in motion between the armed forces of the US and Peru, it would be super interesting to see if the USMC can share with the Peruvian Navy (MGP) the communication/link technology this mobile unmanned system. The MGP successfully operates a locally developed coastal defense system based on a Volvo 380 truck + MBDA Otomat Mk.2 missile launchers (with a range greater than 100 nautical miles). This combination of technologies would be spectacular for the region.
Ukraine has 20 of these 🤯 nice
Russia already has this too.
Autonomous!
Iv been wanted the US to have some "SORAD" System. Hopefully this will be the start
Nice
We need a middle that converts into a torpedo to avoid anti-aircraft
Ship killing is why we have the biggest Navy in world, bar none. Think back on the invasion of Saipan in June of 1944 when Japan sent out their remaining fleet carriers (the ones with aircraft on them) in an attempt to interfere with the amphibious landings of the 4th and 2nd Marine Divisions on the Island of Saipan. A large part of our carrier force went off and just about destroyed them all. The Leyte Gulf in the Philippines was almost a repeat only the Japaenese were mainly using their surface fleet to try and get among the transports and sink them. Our Navy had something like 13 Fleet Carriers protecting the landing forces for the Saipan. The two aforementioned Marine Divisions in assault and the 27th Army Inf Division in reserve. THAT was their MAIN job and they did it very welll and they still can. Any time the US Marine Corps has to worry about firing on enemy ships offshore with some kind of Katyushka Rocket looking thing then the US NAvy is NOT doing it's job! This whole concept is rediculous and is complete WASTE of Taxpayer money for dozen different reasons!!
I ordered two so I can protect my local lake from the Rooskies.
The off road testing looked like break a heart ranch NATC? I haven't been there since Mr. & Mrs Hodges were alive
The Navy Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System (NMESIS) is great concept but they consider another variant with multi mission capability
They should be look at the heavier LRASM for larger targets as well JASSM-ER. The JTLV can't mount, then use the HIMARS as base
They did one for standard missle 6 SM6
Not air liftable yet either.
For the record, Argentina was the first user in combat of a surface to surface platform called the "Berreta launcher vehicle" in the Falklands war in 1982, armed with 2 Exocet missiles.
The Brits had first combat use of a stinger missile too.
The Bulk of the British Navy at that time? They were standing outside w a Brengun. A .303 top loaded light machine gun. When the HMS got a Carrier in range the game changed. The AV-8 Harrier proved its worth. The fucking plane could stop in mid air as you flew by then lock radar and kill you with a Long range sparrow missile. Stop duck fire
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I'm sure the Brits loved the idea of their ships being destroyed by French weaponry. This shouldn't be allowed amongst NATO members!
I don't get it. Would not the Marines already have sea based platformes controlling the sea all around the beachhead were the Marines had landed. And therefore would be the platform s from which such missiles should be based on?
I think that this maybe horseshit
No, that's the Navy's responsibility. The Marines need this system. The reality is there's a lot of islands and lots of water in between. The Navy will not be able to keep ships off the coast of every island the Marines are placed. This system gives them a say in whether or not the enemy can land his marines.
Look back in history to Guadalcanal. The Navy took off leaving the Marines to fend for themselves.
@@ernestnichols5186 Apparently general idea is to keep the opposing Navy as far away as possible and to give Marines enough punch to take out anything that comes close to shore. Its more cost effective to have these on land and move them randomly place to place in a jungle than to have a ship on station that can be caught by satellite or AWACS. Its not so much of enemy marines but its about using our marines to quickly garrison important areas. Say phils we have signed a new deal for 9 bases there but will only really keep spooks there. China starts acting dumb we deploy the Marines with this and they become a very effective threat to any Navy. Cruise missiles can be used but they are too expensive to make a huge dent in a defense. These things will be randomly moved so good look hitting all the possible locations with 2 million dollar missiles.
Somebody with a clue!! Thanks, I was feeling almost alone here. The NAVY's job is to help the Marines establish and protect a beachhead. These Katyushka Rocket lookijng things are a joke! They aren' practical for ANYTHING at all. Not shore defense or defending against warships. Nothing!
This is so very cool!
Agree with the other comment that it’d be even cooler if it’ll be able to shoot LRASM.
Justification for this is of course Tiawan. I suspect that the Marines know that the next war they fight will be on Tiawan and to win Tiawan, attacking the seaborn supply lines will be critical. While warships present a threat, if you can keep the aggressor off of your shore, or if you can destroy their supply lines, they can't take the island. I think the decision to move away from armor also was geared towards the fight for Tiawan. The Marines know that the terrain in Taiwan is not really favorable to tank warfare and as we have seen in the war for Ukraine, tanks may be far less effective than they used to be because of the well proven missiles like the Javelin. Sadly, should China chose to attack, the war is likely to be similar to the one in Ukraine, with the allies in the theater supporting the Tiawanese defense with an on-going supply of weapons and ammunition. I think China has far more to lose by an attempted takeover of Tiawan.
Imagine being so delusional to think the US can protect Taiwan. China is literally next door, while the US is across the entire Pacific Ocean. Logistically this war will fail. This is not WW2, this is 2023. America has also forgone all of its industrial manufacturing to China. America and Europe are both DOOMED because of their economic and strategic blunders of giving all manufacturing to Asia.
China will never touch Taiwan. Too Expensive and repercussions.
Aaah, ok, I was wondering what purpose this could possibly serve the U.S. military, which already has naval dominance of all its own shorelines, but Taiwan makes perfect sense.
a dozen of those things and targeting drones plus a supply of hundreds will make an invasion impossible those launchers will be impossible to spot and take out
@@eduwino151 I am sure that this is what the Taiwan defense forces are hoping, but the Marines Expeditionary Forces will also face the problem of being able to get through a naval blockade. The Chinese have been growing their naval power specifically for the task of trying to ensure that any US carrier group can't get within air combat radius.
👍👍
I like it... I like it allllot....
About 50 of these would look great in Taiwan...probably the Philippines too come to think of it.
50 of those things working with targetting drones could practically delete half of Chinas navy in a week
Is the main differences between MLRS and Nemesis is size, range, and remote operation?
NMESIS launch cruise missiles that have the ability to guide itself. MLRS are generally rockets that variants can be programmable to hit targets using gps. Those rockets don’t maneuver to hit moving targets. But variant rockets are being developed to do so.
The Ukrainian army would love to have this system.
So would Taiwan
How about they develop their own ? We are not their cash cow .
nah Russians are hanging in sevastapol as it is. hahahq
@@discoverycentaury It's difficult to develop your own weapons when you've been invaded and your manufacturing infrastructure is attacked periodically, that is a very naive and wilfully blind suggesting.
@@thryce82 That will change once the Ukrainians are able to move HIMARS units into range of Sevastopol.
It seems to me that the marine land platformed would be better used to base weapons that are aimed at meeting any incoming inland threat.
The marines who were on Guadalcanal in late 1942 would disagree. They would have love having a way to shoot at the Japanese ships supplying there troops or bombarding Henderson Field.
we are. this weapon is suppose to hide near the beach in areas like the phillipines and destroy Chinese shipping that may try to invade. Marines are good for this strategy since they carry lighter equipment and can be rushed to hot spots quickly. If you want to base someone you would send the army if you want to be flexible you send the Marines.
Of course it would. This is about protecting a beachhead. That's the navy's job!
@@jessicacolegrove4152 What? Why, so they fire back at Japanese Battleships with 14' guns? That's absurd!
@@karlheinzvonkroemann2217 it was not battleships that were the issue, it was the DD's bringing in food and ammo for the Japanese troops. and CA's shelling the base
You should add more weapons on it to for drones attacks madrone tries to blow it up it will have a weapon to neutralize a drone attack on the new platform that use are making to destroy ships.....
so a land launched Quicksnk guided bomb?
This will help ships remain undetected in hostile waters.
Send these to Ukraine for testing!
Why would any serious ship come within 100 miles of the coast?
To perform an attack
heavy equipment. Most tanks large artillery cant be airlifted. If you were to somehow get a bridge head you eventually would have to bring in some ships.
@@thryce82 C-5 can airlift every single piece of military hardware.
Pieces of the puzzle are still coming out. Why the Marines got rid of Tanks? This puzzle piece is nice AND costly (capability of ship fight, w/out ship...sweet). Tanks?...Army's got'm :) . Remote(s) of any kind are costly as well but...Logistics etc of moving/manning/op/maint etc... of a tank, when you have the latest/greatest Electronics at hand is Greater than the tank (pen vs sword).
Marine Corpse Literal Regiments will be equipped with this system...yeah
Wonder if you could set these up on the flight deck of the transports for extra protection.
You could put the box launchers on the ships the transports but its probably not necessary
👍🏼
2:28 Welp, looks like the Chinese figured out how to defeat it
A small nut puncher that fits in a Marines back pocket~ So a smaller MLRS?
Ukraine need it 💙💛
Add another zero to its range and your into a winning formula.
Better yet, a trans ocean anti ship missile would be a game changer.
Especially, if you can launch several hundred at the same time.
Thus totally destroying any battle fleet before it becomes a threat to a nation’s sovereign waters.
This is simply the military industrial complex run amuck.
Ukraine Black Sea needs it …to clear out the Black Sea liquidation campaign
So basically a scaled down MLRS....
I doubt it. Anyone who knows the MIC promises of what something can do and how many versions it will take to get their is SOP for military contractors. 3M earplugs. M16A1. Bradley Fighting Vehicle. I bet civilians think this is amazing though. Ridiculous.
Bradley seems to be doing just fine in Ukraine. A lot better than a BMP. Also I very much doubt you understand what a NSM can do since that is quite classified. So let's see what we actually know. A Ukrainian copy of a Russian copy of a 70s era US missile was able to easily sink the vaunted Russian flag ship. I wonder what a missile made from 2012 tech could do? Probably totaly suck it up huh?
Send to Ukraine
Theu should just have gotten the RBS15 missile, it has over 300 km range
Can we send this to Taiwan like yesterday?
This is not for the Marines. It’s for Taiwan, and is exactly what they need❤❤❤❤❤
No it's not.
corps = CORE.
Is Taiwan buying this system?
Send this to Taiwan.
Compro 400.000 unidades para o exército brasileiro
Sorry antiship weapons with range +300km are many but not in EUA/EU
😊
Till it get GPS jammed
Not trying to be the grammar police, but your title should read U.S. Marines Have....-not Has
Obviously Taiwan and Ukraine needs this weapon
Tserkon can kill destroyers at 1000 km.
Compro 900.000.000 unidades para o exército da Ucrânia
Besides that, 100 miles is way to close..how about 3000 miles?
That's an intercontinental ballistic missle ICBM. I doubt they have one on a remote control. We also have stealth long-range missles for land Sea and I think air
i think we have an antisea version of the Tomahawk? Problem is these missiles have a large warhead and that restricts the range. Also ships are moving so you need to have terminal maneuveribilty. You actually shoot these things to a predicted point and they find the ship by themselves at the final stage and align themselves to strike. Thus cant just send a sleek missile like Atacams that cant turn quiclkly. Also it needs to be small enough to fit in a warship. China says their new hypersonic missiles have extreme range but China is like Russia and they both say quite a lot of things that are likely not true.
The S and the end of Corps, is silent. If your going to do these, get it right. We thank you.
This is great at killing ACVs in water, as well.
Give some to Ukraine for "Field Tests"
You know time is hard when the United States of America is worried about *Protecting the Coastlines* 😐
It’s not the US coastline they want to defend, but instead an Island like Taiwan. Mobile anti-ship systems would be hard to take out with a first strike and would be a disastrous surprise for anyone who tries a aquatic invasion.
@@Hiznogood- Please forgive the guy who makes a comment that he is completely clueless 😂
send them to Ukraine
Excuse my question, but don´t underestimate the strength of disturbers, jamming, intercepting and i worst case using this baby against you by abandoning it. Or am I just paranoid? Right now, you can see examples of disturbers and Jammers on JDAM and HIMARS in the Ukraine.
maybe marine core as opposed to corpse? and a new ship-killing weapon "that" can destroy.........................you're welcome!
Send it to Taiwan yesterday.
Blow up mines with cluster bombs
I say give them to Ukraine & let them try them out on the Russian black sea fleet
👍👍👍👍👍
No need that for ship with 100k fighter jat
So how many do the Ukrainians get?
Learn from Ukraine you need quick powerful protection from sea attacks
Yeah the range is nothing they need to go much farther away then what you are doing now
Its designed for a specifc mission in mind. Somewhere like Taiwan
중국에 줄 선물 ?
The Khinzhal is 1000km + range and it’s hypersonic. This is not that special.
Khinzhal can't fit on a truck and be hidden in the jungle on Asian islands.
Ha,ha,ha! 100 miles only! Take a look at Iranian shore to ship cruise missiles with a range of 1000 km
Taiwan is only 100 miles away from china.
ewe iz a gooder repeeter ov neuz.
Isntt the Navy supposed to destroy ships?? Just askin
This is for an island war with China.
Shore Battery is a ARMY mission. Corruption of the Corps assigned Mission. BS!
Pronounced CORE not CORPSE.
Ehy don't we own a missile that instead of hitting the ship,on top.That it goes in the water about 260 feet before it gets there
GIVE UKRAINE 100 OF THESE WEAPONS
Give them to Taiwan 🇹🇼
I'm not yet 35, please stop making my wife mad at me I'm not interested yet.....
whats the point？ land on China and defend the beach against counter landing？
you would land before hostilies. We are making bases and keeping skeleton crews on them in strategic hotspots across the world. China starts mobilizing forces you send rapid forces out like the Marines with this to secure those locations. Once secured you can pick where to send heavier assets like the air force. I doubt landing on China is the point. You rather are trying to restrict shipping which china relies on. islands restrict key areas in the Pacific and this would be a cost effect solution for that. I would geuss invading a country that has 3 times the population of you and nukes is probably not sth anyone takes seriously.
BS missile didn't even move the ship.
Ngày tận thế của Mỹ và nato đã đến...nga và china sẽ đưa mỹ và nato về với chúa trời 😂
AI self-driving?
Unnecessarily expensive.
.....FYI so your narrator is aware of pronouncing Marine Corps correctly. Thank you.
It's a computer voice....
I would rather not hear what new developments we have at the same time telling the enemy of what we have or doing..Best yet, build something to knock out ICBM's at a distance of safety..
In theory It's supposed to be for deterrence
They can't do anything with the information we gave. Don't worry
They already know, just not everything.
ICBM's? Lasers, advanced SM-6 missiles, and surface speed of the ships. ICBM's are best against targets that can't move.
Woopie! My Marines can zap a ChiCom 🇨🇳 ships 100 miles out. Unfortunately, the ChiComs 🇨🇳 have 1k miles missiles.
We have stealth long-range missles USA
1000 miles is a long way to swim ashore in Taiwan…
This together with Spike NLOS will be a very potent defense for Taiwan's coast against an invading Chinese amphibious force.
Few hundred in Taiwan,driving up and down ,just waiting,waiting xpinger ping has no chance
100 miles isn't that impressive.
A flying torpedo capable of destroying the middle 2/3 of a ship's superstructure at 100 nautical miles is. They are cheap and effective. The system can clearly be bolted onto a truck or the deck of most any ship. It is a certified ship killer on par with the Exocet.
it is small enough to carry 2 on a Humvee which is why it matters. you saw that picture of the system is carry by the V22? that means it can be deployed anywhere and no landing strip is required. which is a big deal. it means for example, in the event of a Taiwan invasion, the Marines can deploy these systems to the tiny islands around Taiwan in a few hours.
Computer narration sucks.
Sent them to Ukraine for free.. tax payers money for Ukraine.
Please bring those to Ilocos Norte Philippines so we can hit Chinese ships.
Make longer range antiship missile's for HIMARS and MLRS for the Army because we will end up on islands anyway so yeah we need to get it done Mr Biden you work for me a Veteran and I said get it done now Mr Biden
Pronounced "Core" like core strength. Dont listen to Obama!
America weapons are wayback russia is far advance