Regarding the law, I think most people who break the unconstitutional laws don't think through that decision well enough. For example, if you're driving from gun friendly Indiana to gun friendly Missouri, but are crossing through Illinois for a few hours, think about if you are more likely going to need to defend yourself, or if you are more likely going to be pulled over for a traffic violation. A traffic violation that could then get you arrested for carrying where your permit isn't legal.
Transporting firearms through a state that are otherwise illegal in said state is legal so long as: - the firearm is legal in the state where you started - the firearm is legal in the state of your destination - the firearm is propperly stored & unloaded in the vehicle - you're not taking any uneccesary stops An example of this would be traveling from New Mexico to Wyoming through Colorado. Colorado restricts magazine capacity to 15 rounds. New Mexico and Wyoming have no magazine restrictions. Therefore, it would be completely legal to transport a firearm with a magazine greater than 15 rounds through Colorado in this situation. This is a federal law, you can look it up because there's more details to it than just this. Especially regarding how the firearm needs to be stored.
@@ShrimpChimps It may be a federal law, but the reality has shown that it is difficult for people to make their case in court, costly and of course also requires you don't stop at all even for gas. The Armed Attorneys talk about this.
@Killer-SeveN THAT'S LITERALLY LIKE SAYING WHY DO U HAVE AIR BAGS AND A SEATBELT; I MEAN WHEN IS THE LAST TIME U USED YOUR AIRBAG....OR... WHY EVEN HAVE SMOKE DETECTORS OR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS IN YOUR HOUSE; DO U REALLY THINK U CAN STOP A FIRE; WHY DO U THINK U ARE A FIREMAN? I MEAN WHEN IS THE LAST TIME U USED YOUR FIRE EXTINGUISHER, OR SMOKE ALARM..... SAME AS, "BETTER TO BE A WARRIOR IN A GARDEN, THAN I GARDENER IN A WAR.... YOU PPL ARE IN A CULT! IF U CAN NOT HANDLE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OWNING A FIREARM OK....... LEAVE US ALONE THAT CAN HANDLE THE RESPONSIBILITY RATHER HAVE IT & NOT NEED IT, THAN NEED IT AND NOT HAVE IT!!!!!! RATHER BE JUDGED BY 12 THAN CARRIED BY 6
I have the MALUS SOL, zero belt, and love these videos. Thanks for putting out great products and publishing genuinely informative content like this that helps us grow as protectors.
Brilliant video! Saved this to hopefully educate some family on this for the day I move to America. On the other hand I'm curious, what soundtrack/song did you use in the video? It sounds really familiar
As someone who grew up with guns for hunting, and only now decades and decades later has moved to CCW and guns for personal protection, I really appreciate the points you make and the subtle differences between safety and politeness you point out. I can think of many instances in which a simple announcement (polite) followed by the proper technique of what was announced (safety) can build immense trust and confidence - both within me and with those I’m with. Great stuff and like so much of the gun world, not necessarily obvious or even intuitive. Thanks 👊
I wanna mention in regards to room clearing/BD6. If at all possible, keep your muzzle more than 1 meter in front of your buddies muzzle for field of fire. In a small room, the number of people should decrease, and so does that distance. This is a great video, man, thanks for putting it out. This stuff isnt rigid, outside of the 5 rules of safe handling. Its fairly nuanced, when you think about it, but you have to think about it lol
phew orange pants @4:25 yea idk lol someone could easily turn around and run back in a line of fire, idk how much distance was between the lanes though, it's important to note your personal safety limits should be respected regardless of the range rules, this wouldn't be an exercise I'd participate in.
" A nation of well informed men who have been taught to know and prize the rights which God has given them cannot be enslaved. It is in the region of ignorance that tyranny begins. " ~Benjamin Franklin
2:10 idk I still disagree, one if someone picks ip the firearm they are now handling it and they are by definition handling it while its pointed unsafely, two stuff happens and mechanical systems fail. I would say always point it in a safe direction even if its sat down on a table or bench.
There's a serious problem in the 2A community when it comes to immaturity and lack of responsibility. It's very unfortunate that this hobby attracts some of the most rude, ignorant, immature, completely lacking self awareness crowd. It's hard to be a professional and not just call them idiots and trash like they are. You did a good job here. Bringing people down is easy but it doesn't build a community. Building people up is hard, but that's what we need to buckle down and do for the future of this culture.
In all fairness, you can say the opposite as well. The vast majority of people I have met over 8 years are great people. We all are trying to grow, and we have no issues trying to help others grow.
@@Osprey1994 That is true, there are some GREAT, very solid dudes doing very good work out there. It's just unfortunate that's stupid people are often louder, and bad ideas are often more easily spread because they require little to no thought. Working in the industry I've encountered thieves, cartel and gang members, and some of the most brain dead stupid people imaginable. I've also had the pleasure of rubbing shoulders with spec ops guys, business owners that actually care, and other genuine good, intelligent people. There's a battle being fought not many are aware of. It's the battle for your mind. I hope the good people come out on top.
It has been found that people who are Concealed Carry Permit holders tend to be more law abiding than Police Officers. You can look it up if you want at the Crime Prevention Research Center. "...In state after state, the data show that permit holders are extremely law-abiding, even relative to police officers. Our annual reports on the number of concealed handgun permits provide detailed information by state. While the Tribune cites last year’s report on the number of concealed handgun permits issued nationwide, they ignore our discussion on how law-abiding permit holders are in other states. In any case, a number of states such as Florida, Michigan, Texas, and Utah have readily available links where they provide this information." So, I'd have to say you're wrong about us.
I blame the marketing from the industry, they are focused on getting firearms in as many hands as possible and not bothering to stress responsible gun ownership, handling, storage, and of course trying to NOT get into a DGU. Frankly with permitless carry I think a lot of well-meaning but lazy people are now carrying when they wouldn't before.
" The CONSTITUTION of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their RIGHT and DUTY to be at All Times ARMED." ~Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Catwright June 5th 1824
i have a holosun 507 comp on my G47 as well.. Looking to get backup irons. What height irons is the guy with the G47 using on his? Figured he's squared away and Tenicor could save me a lot of work.
Well said. All the firearms skills you may have are diminished by a poor attitude or lack of common courtesy. While I care little about others becoming offended, I don't wish to be offensive. I try to conduct myself, armed or not, as though my child is watching and learning. When someone asks a somewhat foolish question in regard to why I carry a firearm daily, I ask them if they have insurance; car, home, whatever. Then I ask them if they want to use it. Of course they say no. I say, but you have it, right?
It's stupid, but it doesn't break the universal gun handling rules. What makes it rude is for someone to start handling his gun around other people without giving anyone a clue of what he's doing. It's like a few years ago when people in Texas were strolling into stores and restaurants with their AKs and ARs in the "ready" position. That wasn't illegal and it wasn't breaking the gun handling rules, but it was rude. I'm sitting having a meal with my family and a guy walks in like that... It's going to put other gun owners into Condition Orange...and it's rude to put people into Condition Orange.
In a CCW I took recently they went over how the 4 rules are taught nowadays: 1. Treat all firearms as if they are loaded 2. Keep the gun pointed in a safe direction 3. Keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to shoot 4. Know your target and its surroundings So a little differently worded than what was taught for a very long time. Also good to note that its pretty difficult to endanger someone without breaking every rule at once
“Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target” now a disclaimer before I ask: I know the rules and understand the spirit of the rules, so maybe I’m just being pedantic, but what about firing from retention?
Yes, you're being pedantic. There are gun handling rules, and there are gunfighting rules. The former apply to administrative usage. The latter apply when someone is trying to kill you.
Great question. Is it “your sights are in the target” or “visually confirming your sights are on the target?” Words matter. If shooting from retention is a known skill, then you know exactly where your sights are even if you aren’t looking through them. So if done correctly, shooting from retention is not a violation.
@@JeffMauActual And always remember, in order for your sights to be useful and effective, you should NEVER remove them from your gun. That would be dumb.
@flyoverkid55 that distinction makes no sense. Refer to James Yeager’s video about administrative gun handling. A gun should be handled with consistency every time. To me, “administrative” gun handling only occurs when the gun is being cleaned or maintained. If it is a loaded weapon, it is handled the same way each time. What part of aiming at a target is “administrative”? I’m just arguing for consistency in wording. Maybe instead of using the words “sights on target” we should refer to it as “AIMED at target” which would allow for valid aiming methods like point shooting, gross sight picture, optic body sight picture, or thumb pectoral index from retention.
@@Katana_Gryphon I use the term " administrative " to describe non combative use of the firearm, i.e. target shooting. You can take your time, be as casual as you like. The comment I responded to asks about shooting from retention. This indicates a use for combative purposes and is therefor not an administrative or casual use. You will note that I made no mention of safety or consistency, that's another subject. Just my 2 cents.
Good video, but he needs to throw that "gun on the table" scenario in the trash. Just because I'm not handling my pistol doesn't make it safe. People pick shit up! They can be nervous, confident, or too confident while they're doing it! THAT SHIT IS UNSAFE, PERIOD!!!
When someone picks it up it enters the realm of being handled and that’s what he’s saying. When the gun is not in anyone’s hands it’s not dangerous but once someone is operating it I.e handling it then the fire arm rules apply
Let me give you another scenario. It's like a few years ago when people in Texas were strolling into stores and restaurants with their AKs and ARs in the "ready" position. That wasn't illegal and it wasn't breaking the gun handling rules, but it was rude. I'm sitting having a meal with my family and a guy walks in like that... It's going to put other gun carriers into Condition Orange...and it's rude to put people into Condition Orange for no darned good reason.
It absolutely NEVER ok to have the barrel pointed at anyone or anything EVEN if the gun is on a table. It could be a P320 and just randomly go off. 😂 who actually buys Sig and thinks it’s a good idea?
" If circumstances should at any time obligate the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of ARMS who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist. " ~Alexander Hamilton Federalist No.28 January 10th 1788
I offer the following change. You are a *human*. You have a right to keep and bear arms. This value, whether you believe it is granted by God or is merely a byproduct of rationality, is an underappreciated pillar of a sustainably free and prosperous society. This is not granted in the Constitution, this is merely a preliminary acknowledgement to the promise - routinely broken - that the United States government will not infringe on that right. Unfortunately, most of the world disagrees. Most of the world, as a result, will suffer when their governments devolve into greater and greater forms of totalitarianism and the people have rejected being peaceful for being harmless. This ties well into knowing the consequences of following the law, as well as not following the law.
OMG, ARE YOU SERIOUS?!? At 4:10 time on the video, you guys are running a scenario close to the targets, draw, fire, then run back 15 feet or so, then shoot again, then run back another 15 feet or so, then fire... The guy next to you is down range of you!?!? You have NO business posting gun safety/rules on UA-cam!!!! I will never watch another video of you!!! Wow!!!
It *literally* is exactly what he said @ 06:15: “To tie the politeness piece back to the gun handling, if I take that gun and place it on a table, that is not unsafe gun handling because I’m not handling the gun. However, it might be rude to take a loaded gun and leave it on a table where a bunch of people are walking by.”
@@tenicorusa I was replying to the person that said that *you* said it was okay to just leave a gun laying around and that leaving a gun laying around was not unsafe. That’s not what was said. You actually said, what you just said in the comment below. I was on your side. I think you misunderstood my comment. Or responded to the wrong person.
Brilliant video! Saved this to hopefully educate some family on this for the day I move to America. On the other hand I'm curious, what soundtrack/song did you use in the video? It sounds really familiar
Thanks for NO Ads!
👍
As if youtube would even monetize this😂
Regarding the law, I think most people who break the unconstitutional laws don't think through that decision well enough. For example, if you're driving from gun friendly Indiana to gun friendly Missouri, but are crossing through Illinois for a few hours, think about if you are more likely going to need to defend yourself, or if you are more likely going to be pulled over for a traffic violation. A traffic violation that could then get you arrested for carrying where your permit isn't legal.
When's the last time your car was searched during a traffic stop?
Transporting firearms through a state that are otherwise illegal in said state is legal so long as:
- the firearm is legal in the state where you started
- the firearm is legal in the state of your destination
- the firearm is propperly stored & unloaded in the vehicle
- you're not taking any uneccesary stops
An example of this would be traveling from New Mexico to Wyoming through Colorado. Colorado restricts magazine capacity to 15 rounds. New Mexico and Wyoming have no magazine restrictions. Therefore, it would be completely legal to transport a firearm with a magazine greater than 15 rounds through Colorado in this situation.
This is a federal law, you can look it up because there's more details to it than just this. Especially regarding how the firearm needs to be stored.
@@destroyerofgear When is the last time you needed to use your firearm while on a roadtrip?
@@ShrimpChimps It may be a federal law, but the reality has shown that it is difficult for people to make their case in court, costly and of course also requires you don't stop at all even for gas.
The Armed Attorneys talk about this.
@Killer-SeveN THAT'S LITERALLY LIKE SAYING WHY DO U HAVE AIR BAGS AND A SEATBELT; I MEAN WHEN IS THE LAST TIME U USED YOUR AIRBAG....OR...
WHY EVEN HAVE SMOKE DETECTORS OR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS IN YOUR HOUSE; DO U REALLY THINK U CAN STOP A FIRE; WHY DO U THINK U ARE A FIREMAN? I MEAN WHEN IS THE LAST TIME U USED YOUR FIRE EXTINGUISHER, OR SMOKE ALARM.....
SAME AS, "BETTER TO BE A WARRIOR IN A GARDEN, THAN I GARDENER IN A WAR....
YOU PPL ARE IN A CULT!
IF U CAN NOT HANDLE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OWNING A FIREARM OK.......
LEAVE US ALONE THAT CAN HANDLE THE RESPONSIBILITY
RATHER HAVE IT & NOT NEED IT, THAN NEED IT AND NOT HAVE IT!!!!!!
RATHER BE JUDGED BY 12 THAN CARRIED BY 6
I have the MALUS SOL, zero belt, and love these videos.
Thanks for putting out great products and publishing genuinely informative content like this that helps us grow as protectors.
Thanks for the support!
Jeff is the guy that corrects everyone in meeting and social settings..."we'll actually...."
You're not wrong.
Well said. I use and love your products.
Brilliant video! Saved this to hopefully educate some family on this for the day I move to America.
On the other hand I'm curious, what soundtrack/song did you use in the video? It sounds really familiar
As someone who grew up with guns for hunting, and only now decades and decades later has moved to CCW and guns for personal protection, I really appreciate the points you make and the subtle differences between safety and politeness you point out. I can think of many instances in which a simple announcement (polite) followed by the proper technique of what was announced (safety) can build immense trust and confidence - both within me and with those I’m with. Great stuff and like so much of the gun world, not necessarily obvious or even intuitive. Thanks 👊
Well put. 👊
100% thanks for the comment
I wanna mention in regards to room clearing/BD6. If at all possible, keep your muzzle more than 1 meter in front of your buddies muzzle for field of fire. In a small room, the number of people should decrease, and so does that distance. This is a great video, man, thanks for putting it out. This stuff isnt rigid, outside of the 5 rules of safe handling. Its fairly nuanced, when you think about it, but you have to think about it lol
phew orange pants @4:25 yea idk lol someone could easily turn around and run back in a line of fire, idk how much distance was between the lanes though, it's important to note your personal safety limits should be respected regardless of the range rules, this wouldn't be an exercise I'd participate in.
Well said 💯
Appreciate it 👍
Unfortunately most gun owners do not understand #5.
The older generation has a significant issue in this department.
Great video
Appreciate the support 🤙
Hey Jeff,
Could yall make some j frame holsters please?? Like a small batch of them.
Thanks,
#1 fan
No plans for J-frame holsters at this time. 🤙
But we would love to do that at somepoint!
Looking forward to it!!!!
Excellent points for gun owners!
Were those clips from Richmond rod and gun club??
✅
4:25 That lady in orange is totally panicking LOL
What about don’t shoot at targets when someone else on your team is in a tent down range like in the Staccato video?
Right. Which isn't a violation of any of these given that context...
That would be in safe gun handling
Which Universal Rule of Firearms Handling did the person in the tent down range violate?
" A nation of well informed men who have been taught to know and prize the rights which God has given them cannot be enslaved. It is in the region of ignorance that tyranny begins. "
~Benjamin Franklin
What is the background music playing around 3:20? I swear I've heard that somewhere before...
Pretty sure Garand Thumb used it in a mountain survival/evasion video.
Quite possible. Everyone on YT pulls music from the same basic sources like Epidemic Sounds 🤷
2:10 idk I still disagree, one if someone picks ip the firearm they are now handling it and they are by definition handling it while its pointed unsafely, two stuff happens and mechanical systems fail.
I would say always point it in a safe direction even if its sat down on a table or bench.
There's a serious problem in the 2A community when it comes to immaturity and lack of responsibility.
It's very unfortunate that this hobby attracts some of the most rude, ignorant, immature, completely lacking self awareness crowd.
It's hard to be a professional and not just call them idiots and trash like they are.
You did a good job here.
Bringing people down is easy but it doesn't build a community.
Building people up is hard, but that's what we need to buckle down and do for the future of this culture.
In all fairness, you can say the opposite as well. The vast majority of people I have met over 8 years are great people. We all are trying to grow, and we have no issues trying to help others grow.
@@Osprey1994 That is true, there are some GREAT, very solid dudes doing very good work out there.
It's just unfortunate that's stupid people are often louder, and bad ideas are often more easily spread because they require little to no thought.
Working in the industry I've encountered thieves, cartel and gang members, and some of the most brain dead stupid people imaginable. I've also had the pleasure of rubbing shoulders with spec ops guys, business owners that actually care, and other genuine good, intelligent people.
There's a battle being fought not many are aware of. It's the battle for your mind. I hope the good people come out on top.
It has been found that people who are Concealed Carry Permit holders tend to be more law abiding than Police Officers.
You can look it up if you want at the Crime Prevention Research Center.
"...In state after state, the data show that permit holders are extremely law-abiding, even relative to police officers. Our annual reports on the number of concealed handgun permits provide detailed information by state. While the Tribune cites last year’s report on the number of concealed handgun permits issued nationwide, they ignore our discussion on how law-abiding permit holders are in other states. In any case, a number of states such as Florida, Michigan, Texas, and Utah have readily available links where they provide this information."
So, I'd have to say you're wrong about us.
I blame the marketing from the industry, they are focused on getting firearms in as many hands as possible and not bothering to stress responsible gun ownership, handling, storage, and of course trying to NOT get into a DGU.
Frankly with permitless carry I think a lot of well-meaning but lazy people are now carrying when they wouldn't before.
We've been surprised at how much pushback and negative response there's been when we've argued people should also be polite 🤷
" The CONSTITUTION of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their RIGHT and DUTY to be at All Times ARMED."
~Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Catwright June 5th 1824
Underrated
🤙
Having a range at my house is how I circumvent silly range rules!
💯
Another video I watched of yours, another video I liked of yours.
🤙
i have a holosun 507 comp on my G47 as well.. Looking to get backup irons. What height irons is the guy with the G47 using on his? Figured he's squared away and Tenicor could save me a lot of work.
Those are Ameriglos: GL-429 XL Tall Black Serrated .315" Front, Flat Black .394"
You shoot at Richmond?
Only when we travel to a Kyle Defoor class.
Well said. All the firearms skills you may have are diminished by a poor attitude or lack of common courtesy. While I care little about others becoming offended, I don't wish to be offensive. I try to conduct myself, armed or not, as though my child is watching and learning.
When someone asks a somewhat foolish question in regard to why I carry a firearm daily, I ask them if they have insurance; car, home, whatever. Then I ask them if they want to use it. Of course they say no. I say, but you have it, right?
Great comment sir. I am going to use this.
@@andershilmo1866 By all means, feel free.
" If we are to guard against ignorance and remain free, it is the responsibility of every American to be informed. "
~Thomas Jefferson
I Am A JACKASS. BUT not with a gun.
Richmond Rod and Gun
There should be NO laws on any and all guns!!!
That seems very reasonable and nuanced 😂😂
Why on earth would you take your gun out, lay it on a table where a bunch of people are walking around? That's not rude, that just f'ing stupid.
It's stupid, but it doesn't break the universal gun handling rules. What makes it rude is for someone to start handling his gun around other people without giving anyone a clue of what he's doing. It's like a few years ago when people in Texas were strolling into stores and restaurants with their AKs and ARs in the "ready" position. That wasn't illegal and it wasn't breaking the gun handling rules, but it was rude. I'm sitting having a meal with my family and a guy walks in like that... It's going to put other gun owners into Condition Orange...and it's rude to put people into Condition Orange.
👽🥃🎱😷🍕
Rule 1 is worded poorly. All guns are not always loaded, but they should be treated as if they are.
"All guns are always loaded" is a statement of belief and it's worded that way intentionally.
@@tenicorusa it's still poorly worded and causes confusion with new shooters.
Rule number 6: Don't be "That Guy"
@@ArizonaGunsDave you should head your own advice.
@@techtrain65 Well I simply pointed you out. Not sure why you’re confused but being as you’re “That Guy” your confusion is understandable!
In a CCW I took recently they went over how the 4 rules are taught nowadays:
1. Treat all firearms as if they are loaded
2. Keep the gun pointed in a safe direction
3. Keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to shoot
4. Know your target and its surroundings
So a little differently worded than what was taught for a very long time. Also good to note that its pretty difficult to endanger someone without breaking every rule at once
“Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target” now a disclaimer before I ask: I know the rules and understand the spirit of the rules, so maybe I’m just being pedantic, but what about firing from retention?
Yes, you're being pedantic. There are gun handling rules, and there are gunfighting rules. The former apply to administrative usage. The latter apply when someone is trying to kill you.
Great question. Is it “your sights are in the target” or “visually confirming your sights are on the target?” Words matter. If shooting from retention is a known skill, then you know exactly where your sights are even if you aren’t looking through them. So if done correctly, shooting from retention is not a violation.
@@JeffMauActual And always remember, in order for your sights to be useful and effective, you should NEVER remove them from your gun. That would be dumb.
@flyoverkid55 that distinction makes no sense. Refer to James Yeager’s video about administrative gun handling. A gun should be handled with consistency every time. To me, “administrative” gun handling only occurs when the gun is being cleaned or maintained. If it is a loaded weapon, it is handled the same way each time. What part of aiming at a target is “administrative”? I’m just arguing for consistency in wording. Maybe instead of using the words “sights on target” we should refer to it as “AIMED at target” which would allow for valid aiming methods like point shooting, gross sight picture, optic body sight picture, or thumb pectoral index from retention.
@@Katana_Gryphon I use the term " administrative " to describe non combative use of the firearm, i.e. target shooting. You can take your time, be as casual as you like. The comment I responded to asks about shooting from retention. This indicates a use for combative purposes and is therefor not an administrative or casual use. You will note that I made no mention of safety or consistency, that's another subject. Just my 2 cents.
Good video, but he needs to throw that "gun on the table" scenario in the trash. Just because I'm not handling my pistol doesn't make it safe. People pick shit up! They can be nervous, confident, or too confident while they're doing it! THAT SHIT IS UNSAFE, PERIOD!!!
When someone picks it up it enters the realm of being handled and that’s what he’s saying. When the gun is not in anyone’s hands it’s not dangerous but once someone is operating it I.e handling it then the fire arm rules apply
I'm still trying to figure out who the hell is all these people just laying their gun on a table, walking away with a bunch of people walking around.
Let me give you another scenario. It's like a few years ago when people in Texas were strolling into stores and restaurants with their AKs and ARs in the "ready" position. That wasn't illegal and it wasn't breaking the gun handling rules, but it was rude. I'm sitting having a meal with my family and a guy walks in like that... It's going to put other gun carriers into Condition Orange...and it's rude to put people into Condition Orange for no darned good reason.
I dont need a permit to carry my weapon.
It absolutely NEVER ok to have the barrel pointed at anyone or anything EVEN if the gun is on a table.
It could be a P320 and just randomly go off. 😂 who actually buys Sig and thinks it’s a good idea?
" If circumstances should at any time obligate the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of ARMS who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist. "
~Alexander Hamilton Federalist No.28 January 10th 1788
Maybe compile everything into one post instead of spamming?
I'm betting that wasn't found anywhere in the musical.
@@Osprey1994 YOUR WELCOME FOR GIVING U SOME KNOWLEDGE TO MEMORIZE.....AND LIVE BY.
@@Osprey1994 PPLS BRAINS ARE BROKEN BECAUSE OF INSTANT GRATIFICATION WITH DUMBPHONES. THEY WILL NOT READ MORECTHAN A PARAGRAPH; MAYBE.
@Osprey1994 DOES MY RETORT SUFFICE, SON.
I offer the following change.
You are a *human*. You have a right to keep and bear arms. This value, whether you believe it is granted by God or is merely a byproduct of rationality, is an underappreciated pillar of a sustainably free and prosperous society. This is not granted in the Constitution, this is merely a preliminary acknowledgement to the promise - routinely broken - that the United States government will not infringe on that right. Unfortunately, most of the world disagrees. Most of the world, as a result, will suffer when their governments devolve into greater and greater forms of totalitarianism and the people have rejected being peaceful for being harmless. This ties well into knowing the consequences of following the law, as well as not following the law.
OMG, ARE YOU SERIOUS?!? At 4:10 time on the video, you guys are running a scenario close to the targets, draw, fire, then run back 15 feet or so, then shoot again, then run back another 15 feet or so, then fire... The guy next to you is down range of you!?!? You have NO business posting gun safety/rules on UA-cam!!!! I will never watch another video of you!!! Wow!!!
🤦♂️
Standard practice for more advanced classes which we explained in the video.
Dude really said it's ok to leave a gun laying around and it is a safe thing to do. INSTANTLY lost all credibility.
Well it won't fire itself, he said its not 'unsafe'.
And he specifically said that it could be rude...
That’s literally not what he said at all lol
It *literally* is exactly what he said @ 06:15:
“To tie the politeness piece back to the gun handling, if I take that gun and place it on a table, that is not unsafe gun handling because I’m not handling the gun. However, it might be rude to take a loaded gun and leave it on a table where a bunch of people are walking by.”
@@tenicorusa I was replying to the person that said that *you* said it was okay to just leave a gun laying around and that leaving a gun laying around was not unsafe. That’s not what was said.
You actually said, what you just said in the comment below. I was on your side.
I think you misunderstood my comment. Or responded to the wrong person.
Brilliant video! Saved this to hopefully educate some family on this for the day I move to America.
On the other hand I'm curious, what soundtrack/song did you use in the video? It sounds really familiar
Thanks for the support!
Not sure on the background music, some track from Epidemic Sounds.