I absolutely am not predominated by mental images. No way. I am a composer however. I don't see mental images at all basically. Now, in NLP, we "learn" that either visual or auditory will predominate in one individual. Using the weaker function is useful in generating trance (hypnosis). You can gauge which a person is based on their words: "I see what you mean", I hear what you're saying" etc. So I don't think it's fair to lump all of this type into visual processors 🤍 what would a predominant auditory processor sound like ? I enjoy your work and its usefulness.
The thing is it's far more difficult to understand Intuition on its own merit, because Jung's description of Intuition is very abstract and it's meaning is up to the reader's interpretation. Its language structure is also very complex and simplifying it just makes it sound ridiculous. I'm currently working on a video script on the side that can explain Intuition to the best of my ability. But to give you a simple breakdown, Intuition is a way of perceiving the world. We all take in information from the world. According to Jung, people take in information through a lens that filters information. Its like that saying, "People only see the things they want to see". Jung's concept of perception is like that. Everyone engages with and takes in information from the reality, the reality is the same, and yet people perceive things differently. People that have Sensing perception, perceive reality for what it is through their senses. Its the simple form of perception. People that have Intuition perception, perceive reality not for what it is but they see it as a bunch of reoccurring patterns that can be broken down by symbols and overarching philosophical ideas.
@@MindMaverick1 Okey thankss... I think I should collect some from these and add to some from other places to form an understanding. But for the best.. I'm also waiting for your video 💙💙
@@MindMaverick1 My compliments on this video. “INTUITION (L. intueri, ‘to look at or into’). I regard intuition as a basic psychological function (q.v.). It is the function that mediates perceptions in an unconscious way. Everything, whether outer or inner objects or their relationships, can be the focus of this perception. The peculiarity of intuition is that it is neither sense perception, nor feeling, nor intellectual inference, although it may also appear in these forms. In intuition a content presents itself whole and complete, without our being able to explain or discover how this content came into existence. Intuition is a kind of instinctive apprehension, no matter of what contents. Like sensation (q.v.), it is an irrational (q.v.) function of perception. As with sensation, its contents have the character of being “given,” in contrast to the “derived” or “produced” character of thinking and feeling (qq.v.) contents. Intuitive knowledge possesses an intrinsic certainty and conviction, which enabled Spinoza (and Bergson) to uphold the scientia intuitiva as the highest form of knowledge. Intuition shares this quality with sensation (q.v.), whose certainty rests on its physical foundation. The certainty of intuition rests equally on a definite state of psychic “alertness” of whose origin the subject is unconscious.” ― C.G. Jung, Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Volume 6: Psychological Types and @ArathiJNair, as MindMaverick2 explains, Intuition is a perceiving function. Perceiving being the key word here. Introverted intuition is a priori knowledge. Knowledge outside of experience, We judge with thinking or with feeling. A priori knowledge is independent from any experience. A posteriori is from Latin ā posteriōrī, which means literally, "from what is later." It describes knowledge based solely on experience or personal observation. 🖖
The sensing type would seem more closely associated directly with the body-ego, intuition the "soul". Even when you take in experience, the raw data only truly has meaning when it is _comprehended at its source._ It goes deeper, and is therefore more real. Sensing is seemingly childish as compared. Oooo sting!...
the most precise explanation on youtube about Ni function congrats
This video is so high production. I like the ai speaker's voice as well. It's also nice to see a mbti youtuber to actually know what they talk about
If there is a UA-camr. Maybe it's only AI.😲
I absolutely am not predominated by mental images. No way. I am a composer however. I don't see mental images at all basically.
Now, in NLP, we "learn" that either visual or auditory will predominate in one individual. Using the weaker function is useful in generating trance (hypnosis). You can gauge which a person is based on their words: "I see what you mean", I hear what you're saying" etc.
So I don't think it's fair to lump all of this type into visual processors 🤍 what would a predominant auditory processor sound like ?
I enjoy your work and its usefulness.
👍🙏❤
What does intuition means before we classify them into introverted and extroverted ???😅
The thing is it's far more difficult to understand Intuition on its own merit, because Jung's description of Intuition is very abstract and it's meaning is up to the reader's interpretation. Its language structure is also very complex and simplifying it just makes it sound ridiculous. I'm currently working on a video script on the side that can explain Intuition to the best of my ability.
But to give you a simple breakdown, Intuition is a way of perceiving the world. We all take in information from the world. According to Jung, people take in information through a lens that filters information. Its like that saying, "People only see the things they want to see". Jung's concept of perception is like that. Everyone engages with and takes in information from the reality, the reality is the same, and yet people perceive things differently. People that have Sensing perception, perceive reality for what it is through their senses. Its the simple form of perception. People that have Intuition perception, perceive reality not for what it is but they see it as a bunch of reoccurring patterns that can be broken down by symbols and overarching philosophical ideas.
@@MindMaverick1 Okey thankss... I think I should collect some from these and add to some from other places to form an understanding. But for the best.. I'm also waiting for your video 💙💙
@@MindMaverick1 My compliments on this video.
“INTUITION (L. intueri, ‘to look at or into’). I regard intuition as a basic psychological function (q.v.). It is the function that mediates perceptions in an unconscious way.
Everything, whether outer or inner objects or their relationships, can be the focus of this perception. The peculiarity of intuition is that it is neither sense perception, nor feeling, nor intellectual inference, although it may also appear in these forms.
In intuition a content presents itself whole and complete, without our being able to explain or discover how this content came into existence.
Intuition is a kind of instinctive apprehension, no matter of what contents.
Like sensation (q.v.), it is an irrational (q.v.) function of perception. As with sensation, its contents have the character of being “given,” in contrast to the “derived” or “produced” character of thinking and feeling (qq.v.) contents.
Intuitive knowledge possesses an intrinsic certainty and conviction, which enabled Spinoza (and Bergson) to uphold the scientia intuitiva as the highest form of knowledge. Intuition shares this quality with sensation (q.v.), whose certainty rests on its physical foundation.
The certainty of intuition rests equally on a definite state of psychic “alertness” of whose origin the subject is unconscious.”
― C.G. Jung, Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Volume 6: Psychological Types
and @ArathiJNair, as MindMaverick2 explains, Intuition is a perceiving function.
Perceiving being the key word here.
Introverted intuition is a priori knowledge. Knowledge outside of experience,
We judge with thinking or with feeling.
A priori knowledge is independent from any experience.
A posteriori is from Latin ā posteriōrī, which means literally, "from what is later." It describes knowledge based solely on experience or personal observation.
🖖
"the function of intuition is to inform intelligence"
Ra Material
The sensing type would seem more closely associated directly with the body-ego, intuition the "soul". Even when you take in experience, the raw data only truly has meaning when it is _comprehended at its source._ It goes deeper, and is therefore more real. Sensing is seemingly childish as compared.
Oooo sting!...